Seed Vacuum VIGS Infiltration: A Complete Protocol for Rapid Gene Function Analysis

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive guide to the seed vacuum infiltration method for Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), a powerful reverse genetics tool that enables rapid, high-throughput functional gene analysis without stable transformation. Tailored for researchers and scientists, we detail the foundational principles of VIGS, present step-by-step optimized protocols for diverse plant species including sunflower, soybean, and Atriplex canescens, and offer extensive troubleshooting for common challenges. The content further covers critical validation techniques and compares seed vacuum VIGS with other inoculation methods, providing a complete resource for implementing this efficient technique in functional genomics and drug discovery research.

Understanding Seed Vacuum VIGS: Principles and Advantages for Functional Genomics

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) is a powerful reverse genetics tool that leverages the plant's innate post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) machinery to transiently knock down target gene expression. As a rapid, cost-effective alternative to stable transformation, VIGS has become indispensable for functional genomics in a wide range of plant species, particularly those that are recalcitrant to genetic transformation [1]. The core mechanism involves sequence-specific mRNA degradation triggered by recombinant viral vectors, leading to observable phenotypic changes that enable gene function characterization. This application note details the molecular underpinnings of VIGS, provides optimized protocols for its implementation, and visualizes the key pathways involved, with particular emphasis on advancing seed vacuum infiltration methodologies.

Core Molecular Mechanism of VIGS

The PTGS Foundation of VIGS

VIGS operates as a refined application of the plant's natural antiviral defense system. When a plant detects viral infection, it initiates PTGS as a defense mechanism to degrade viral RNA [1] [2]. The VIGS technology co-opts this pathway by using recombinant viral vectors carrying fragments of host plant genes, thereby redirecting the silencing machinery toward endogenous cellular mRNAs [1].

The fundamental process involves several key steps:

• Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) Formation: The recombinant virus replicates within host cells, generating dsRNA molecules either as replication intermediates or through host RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR) activity [2].
• dicer-mediated Processing: Cellular Dicer-like (DCL) enzymes, primarily DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4, recognize and cleave these dsRNAs into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of 21-24 nucleotides in length [1] [2].
• RISC Assembly and mRNA Cleavage: These siRNAs are incorporated into an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), where they serve as guides for sequence-specific identification and degradation of complementary mRNA transcripts through Argonaute (AGO) protein-mediated cleavage [1] [2].

Key Differences Between Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Silencing

It is crucial to distinguish PTGS from transcriptional gene silencing (TGS), as they operate through fundamentally distinct mechanisms:

Table 1: Comparison of TGS and PTGS Mechanisms

Feature	Transcriptional Gene Silencing (TGS)	Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS)
Level of Regulation	Transcriptional	Post-transcriptional
Primary Mechanism	DNA methylation & chromatin remodeling	mRNA degradation & translational inhibition
Cellular Localization	Nuclear	Cytoplasmic
Molecular Triggers	RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM)	dsRNA-derived siRNAs
Outcome	Blocked transcription	Degraded mRNA
Stability	Generally stable & heritable	Transient & reversible

Source: Adapted from [2]

Quantitative Assessment of VIGS Efficiency

The effectiveness of VIGS protocols varies significantly based on the plant species, viral vector, and infiltration method employed. The following table summarizes performance metrics across different optimization studies:

Table 2: VIGS Efficiency Metrics Across Plant Species and Methods

Plant Species	Target Gene	Vector System	Infiltration Method	Silencing Efficiency	Key Optimization Factors
Soybean	GmPDS, GmRpp6907, GmRPT4	TRV	Cotyledon node immersion	65-95%	Agrobacterium strain GV3101; 20-30 min immersion [3]
Sunflower	HaPDS	TRV	Seed vacuum infiltration	Up to 91% (genotype-dependent)	6h co-cultivation; genotype selection [4]
Cotton	GhGOLS2, GhFER, GhHLS1	TRV	Seed imbibition (Si-VIGS)	Superior in belowground tissues	Use of reproduced virus sap; radicle wounding during imbibition [5]
Camellia drupifera	CdCRY1, CdLAC15	TRV	Pericarp cutting immersion	~93.94%	Early developmental stage; tissue-specific optimization [6]
Wheat & Maize	PDS, MLO	TRV	Vacuum (germinated seeds)	Whole-plant level silencing	Novel infiltration solution (acetosyringone, cysteine, Tween 20) [7]

Visualization of VIGS Mechanism and Workflow

The PTGS Pathway in VIGS

The following diagram illustrates the core molecular mechanism of Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing as harnessed in VIGS:

Experimental Workflow for Seed Vacuum VIGS

The optimized protocol for seed vacuum infiltration represents a significant advancement for applying VIGS to challenging plant species:

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Successful implementation of VIGS, particularly seed vacuum protocols, requires carefully selected research reagents and materials. The following table details key components and their functions:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS Implementation

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes
TRV Vectors (pYL192/TRV1, pYL156/TRV2)	Bipartite viral vector system	TRV1 encodes replication proteins; TRV2 carries target gene fragment [4] [8]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Vector delivery	Optimized for virulence; requires appropriate antibiotic resistance [3] [4]
Acetosyringone	Vir gene inducer	Critical for activating Agrobacterium virulence genes; typically 200 μM [8] [7]
Infiltration Solution	Delivery medium	Contains MgCl₂, MES, acetosyringone; some protocols add cysteine, Tween 20 [7]
Selection Antibiotics	Selective pressure	Kanamycin (50 μg/mL), gentamicin (25 μg/mL), rifampicin (50-100 μg/mL) [4] [8]
Reference Genes (GhACT7, GhPP2A1)	qPCR normalization	Essential for accurate silencing verification; avoid unstable references like GhUBQ7 [8]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Seed Vacuum VIGS Protocol for Sunflower

This optimized protocol achieves up to 91% infection efficiency in sunflower, with minimal requirements for in vitro culture [4]:

Day 1: Vector Preparation

• Transform recombinant TRV2 vectors (containing 200-300 bp target gene fragments) and TRV1 into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 via electroporation.
• Plate transformed Agrobacterium on LB agar with appropriate antibiotics (kanamycin 50 μg/mL, gentamicin 25 μg/mL, rifampicin 100 μg/mL).
• Incubate at 28°C for 48 hours.

Day 3: Agrobacterium Culture Preparation

• Inoculate single colonies into 5 mL liquid LB with antibiotics and grow overnight at 28°C with shaking (200-240 rpm).
• Dilute the culture 1:50 in fresh LB medium supplemented with 10 mM MES and 200 μM acetosyringone.
• Grow until OD600 reaches 0.8-1.0 (approximately 16-20 hours).

Day 4: Seed Infiltration

• Prepare sunflower seeds by removing seed coats to enhance infiltration efficiency.
• Prepare infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone).
• Mix TRV1 and TRV2 cultures in 1:1 ratio, centrifuge at 5000 × g for 15 minutes, and resuspend in infiltration buffer to OD600 1.0-1.5.
• Subject seeds to vacuum infiltration in the Agrobacterium suspension for 30 minutes.
• Transfer seeds to co-cultivation medium and incubate for 6 hours in the dark.

Day 5: Transplant and Growth

• Transplant treated seeds directly to soil (3:1 peat:perlite mixture).
• Maintain plants at 22°C with 18-hour photoperiod and 45% relative humidity.
• Observe silencing phenotypes 2-3 weeks post-infiltration.

Cotyledon Node Immersion for Soybean

This method achieves 65-95% silencing efficiency in soybean, addressing challenges posed by thick cuticles and dense trichomes [3]:

• Prepare Agrobacterium cultures as described in section 6.1.
• Surface-sterilize soybean seeds and imbibe in sterile water until swollen.
• longitudinally bisect seeds to obtain half-seed explants with intact cotyledonary nodes.
• Immerse fresh explants in Agrobacterium suspension for 20-30 minutes with gentle agitation.
• Co-cultivate on medium for 3 days in the dark.
• Transfer to regeneration medium with antibiotics to eliminate Agrobacterium.
• Monitor GFP fluorescence at day 4 post-infection to verify transformation efficiency.

Critical Factors for Protocol Success

Determining Silencing Efficiency

Multiple approaches should be employed to confirm successful gene silencing:

• Phenotypic Assessment: Monitor for visible markers such as photobleaching in PDS-silenced plants or other expected morphological changes [3] [4].
• Molecular Verification:
  • Quantify mRNA reduction via RT-qPCR using stable reference genes (e.g., GhACT7/GhPP2A1 in cotton) [8]
  • Detect viral presence in both silenced and non-silenced tissues using RT-PCR [4]
• Statistical Analysis: Ensure adequate biological replicates (typically n≥6) and appropriate statistical tests to confirm silencing significance.

Troubleshooting Common Issues

• Low Infection Efficiency: Optimize Agrobacterium density (OD600 0.8-1.2), increase vacuum pressure/duration, or extend co-cultivation time [4].
• Uneven Silencing: Ensure uniform Agrobacterium suspension and consistent seed quality across treatments.
• Plant Genotype Dependence: Test multiple genotypes and select those with higher transformation competence [4].
• Unstable Silencing: Maintain consistent environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, photoperiod) throughout the experiment [1].

The core mechanism of VIGS represents a sophisticated application of the plant's native PTGS pathway, harnessed for precise gene function analysis. Through continued optimization of delivery methods—particularly seed vacuum infiltration—VIGS has become increasingly accessible for functional genomics in recalcitrant species. The protocols and mechanistic insights provided in this application note offer researchers a comprehensive framework for implementing this powerful technology, with specific considerations for advancing seed vacuum VIGS methodologies in both model and non-model plant species. As the field progresses, integration of VIGS with emerging technologies like nanoparticle-mediated delivery and multi-omics approaches will further expand its utility in plant functional genomics and biotechnology.

The delivery of genetic material into plants is a fundamental requirement for both basic research and agricultural biotechnology. However, many plant species, particularly perennial crops and woody plants, remain recalcitrant to stable genetic transformation using conventional methods like Agrobacterium-mediated transformation or biolistic delivery that rely on in vitro tissue culture [9]. These techniques face significant hurdles including genotype dependence, low regeneration efficiency, and the challenges of working with reproductive tissues in species with long life cycles or unsynchronized flowering [9].

Seed vacuum infiltration has emerged as a powerful in planta transformation strategy that effectively bypasses these persistent barriers. By directly delivering genetic cargo—including components for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) and CRISPR-based genome editing—into the air spaces of imbibed seeds, this technique enables researchers to achieve transient or stable genetic modification without the need for tissue culture [10] [11]. This Application Note examines the scientific rationale underlying seed vacuum infiltration, provides optimized protocols for its implementation, and demonstrates its application within a research program focused on VIGS infiltration protocols.

Technical Rationale: How Seed Vacuum Infiltration Overcomes Key Barriers

Physical Principles and Biological Targets

The method leverages the natural architecture of the seed coat, particularly the presence of hourglass cells (osteosclereids) in the sub-epidermal layer of many plant species [10]. These specialized cells create significant air spaces within the seed coat structure. During the vacuum infiltration process, the application of negative pressure evacuates these air pockets. Upon release of the vacuum, the infiltration medium containing the desired genetic material is drawn into the voids, achieving deep penetration into the seed [10]. This mechanism enables direct access to embryonic tissues that will eventually give rise to the entire mature plant, including the germline.

Advantages Over Conventional Transformation Systems

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Transformation Techniques

Transformation Method	Tissue Culture Requirement	Genotype Independence	Transgene-Free Potential	Typical Efficiency	Key Limitations
Seed Vacuum Infiltration	No	High	Yes	Moderate to High (e.g., 15-20% in jute) [11]	Host specificity; vector capacity
Agrobacterium (Stable)	Yes	Low	No	Low to Moderate	Host specificity; somaclonal variation
Biolistics (Stable)	Yes	Low	No	Low to Moderate	Complex DNA integration; high equipment cost
Virus-Induced Genome Editing (VIGE)	No	Moderate	Yes [12]	Variable	Limited cargo capacity; host immunity [12]
Floral Dip	No	Moderate	Possible	Low in monocots [9]	Relies on synchronized flowering

As illustrated in Table 1, seed vacuum infiltration provides distinct advantages by eliminating the tissue culture requirement, which is a major bottleneck for many species. This bypasses associated problems such as somalonal variation, prolonged regeneration timelines, and low efficiency in recalcitrant species. Furthermore, the technique aligns with the growing regulatory preference for transgene-free edited plants, as the transient delivery of editing components can create non-transgenic mutations [12] [9].

Quantitative Optimization Parameters for Seed Vacuum Infiltration

Systematic optimization of physical and chemical parameters is crucial for achieving high transformation efficiency. Recent research provides quantitative data for key variables.

Table 2: Optimized Parameters for Seed Vacuum Infiltration

Parameter	Optimal Range/Type	Experimental Impact	Supporting Evidence
Infiltration Time	Shorter duration favored [10]	Maximizes nanoparticle infiltration	Fluorescent silica NP tracking in soybean [10]
Nanoparticle Surface Charge	Negative [10]	Enhances infiltration efficiency	Fluorescent silica NP tracking in soybean [10]
Nanoparticle Concentration	Higher concentration [10]	Increases infiltration amount	Fluorescent silica NP tracking in soybean [10]
Infiltrate Ionic Strength	Potassium-based salts [10]	Improves infiltration; co-delivers beneficial nutrients	Elemental analysis of seed coats [10]
Bacterial Concentration (OD₆₀₀)	1.0 [13]	Critical for Agrobacterium-mediated delivery	Orthogonal testing in Paeonia ostii [13]
Acetosyringone Concentration	200 μM [13]	Maximizes Agrobacterium virulence	Orthogonal testing in Paeonia ostii [13]
Negative Pressure Treatments	6 cycles [13]	Significantly increases transformation efficiency	Orthogonal testing in Paeonia ostii [13]

Experimental Protocols

Core Protocol: Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Imbibed Jute Seeds

This protocol, achieving 15-20% transformation efficiency in jute, details the essential steps for seed vacuum infiltration [11].

Materials Required:

• Seeds: Corchorus olitorius (tossa jute) or C. capsularis (white jute)
• Agrobacterium strain: GV3101 carrying the binary vector of interest
• Infiltration Medium: Liquid LB or YEP medium with appropriate antibiotics
• Vacuum System: Desiccator connected to a vacuum pump
• Selection Medium: MS medium supplemented with hygromycin-B (50 mg/L)

Procedure:

• Seed Imbibition: Surface-sterilize jute seeds and imbibe in sterile water for 16 hours at room temperature.
• Agrobacterium Preparation: Grow Agrobacterium culture overnight to late log phase (OD₆₀₀ ≈ 1.0). Centrifuge and resuspend in infiltration medium to final OD₆₀₀ of 0.8-1.0.
• Seed Piercing: Mechanically pierce the imbibed seeds at the distal end using a fine sterile needle to create micro-entry points for Agrobacterium.
• Vacuum Infiltration:
  • Transfer pierced seeds to the Agrobacterium suspension.
  • Place the container inside a vacuum desiccator.
  • Apply a vacuum of 400-500 mmHg for 5-10 minutes.
  • Gradually release the vacuum to allow the suspension to infiltrate the seeds.
• Co-cultivation: Incubate infiltrated seeds in the Agrobacterium suspension for 30-60 minutes with gentle shaking. Blot dry on sterile filter paper and transfer to co-cultivation medium for 2-3 days in the dark at 25°C.
• Selection and Regeneration: Transfer co-cultivated seeds to selection medium containing hygromycin-B. Subculture surviving explants every 3-4 weeks until shoots develop.
• Molecular Validation: Confirm transformation events using PCR, Southern blot, or GUS histochemical assay.

Advanced Protocol: Fluorescent Nanoparticle Tracking for Parameter Optimization

This protocol uses fluorescent silica nanoparticles to quantitatively monitor infiltration efficiency, providing a robust method for optimizing parameters across different species [10].

Materials Required:

• Fluorescent Reporters: Rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RITC) or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-tagged silica nanoparticles (50-100 nm diameter)
• Imaging Equipment: Confocal laser scanning microscope
• Seeds: Soybean (Glycine max) or other target species

Procedure:

• Nanoparticle Preparation: Suspend fluorescent silica nanoparticles in infiltration buffer at varying concentrations (e.g., 0.1-1.0 mg/mL).
• Vacuum Infiltration: Subject presoaked seeds to nanoparticle suspension under optimized vacuum parameters (e.g., 500 mmHg for 5 minutes).
• Microscopic Analysis: Section infiltrated seeds and image using confocal microscopy to determine nanoparticle penetration depth and distribution patterns.
• Quantitative Measurement: Use fluorescence intensity measurements to compare infiltration efficiency across different experimental conditions.
• Elemental Analysis: Complement fluorescence data with SEM-EDS analysis of seed coat elements to track co-delivery of beneficial nutrients.

Integration with VIGS and Genome Editing Applications

Seed vacuum infiltration serves as a critical delivery platform for Virus-Induced Genome Editing (VIGE), a transformative approach that uses viral vectors to transiently deliver CRISPR components into plant cells [12]. This combination enables researchers to achieve heritable, transgene-free genome edits in a single generation, bypassing both tissue culture and the need for stable transformation [12].

The workflow diagram below illustrates how seed vacuum infiltration integrates with VIGS and genome editing applications:

Key Integration Points:

• Delivery of Viral Vectors: Seed vacuum infiltration efficiently introduces viral vectors carrying CRISPR/Cas components into plant cells, leveraging the natural infection and systemic movement capabilities of viruses [12].
• Meristem Targeting: Successful infiltration can lead to editing of meristematic cells, enabling the recovery of non-chimeric, heritable mutations in the next generation [9].
• Protocol Synergy: The optimized parameters for seed vacuum infiltration (Section 3) directly enhance the efficiency of VIGE by ensuring robust delivery of viral constructs into embryonic tissues.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for Seed Vacuum Infiltration

Reagent / Material	Function	Application Notes
Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles	Tracking infiltration efficiency and distribution [10]	Use RITC or FITC tags; 50-100 nm optimal for visualization and movement
Acetosyringone	Induces Agrobacterium vir genes for enhanced T-DNA transfer [13]	Critical for Agrobacterium-mediated protocols; optimal at 200 μM [13]
Movement Proteins (MP)	Facilitate cell-to-cell movement of viral vectors [12]	Essential for VIGE applications to achieve systemic spread
RNAi Suppressors	Counteracts plant immune response to viral vectors [12]	Enhances persistence and spread of VIGE constructs
Hygromycin-B	Selection agent for transformed tissues [11]	Standard concentration: 50 mg/L for jute selection [11]
Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles	Delivery vehicle for agrochemicals or biomolecules [10]	Tunable surface chemistry for cargo loading and release

Seed vacuum infiltration represents a paradigm shift in plant genetic engineering methodology, effectively addressing the persistent challenge of transformation recalcitrance across diverse species. By bypassing the tissue culture bottleneck and enabling direct delivery of editing components to meristematic tissues, this technique accelerates both basic research and applied crop improvement programs. The optimized parameters and standardized protocols presented in this Application Note provide researchers with a robust framework for implementing this powerful technology, particularly when integrated with emerging VIGE platforms. As global regulatory frameworks increasingly favor transgene-free edited plants, seed vacuum infiltration stands poised to become an indispensable tool for the next generation of plant biotechnology innovation.

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) is a powerful reverse genetics tool that leverages the plant's innate antiviral RNA interference mechanism to silence target genes. The seed vacuum infiltration protocol represents a significant methodological advancement, enabling highly efficient, whole-plant level gene silencing by introducing Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-based vectors into germinating seeds through a combination of vacuum and co-cultivation. This technique is particularly valuable for studying gene function in non-model plant species and at early developmental stages, bypassing the need for stable genetic transformation.

The core principle involves using Agrobacterium tumefaciens to deliver a TRV vector containing a fragment of the target plant gene. After infiltration and viral replication, the plant's defense machinery processes the viral RNA into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which guide the sequence-specific degradation of complementary endogenous mRNA transcripts, resulting in gene silencing.

The following diagram illustrates the molecular mechanism and workflow of the seed vacuum VIGS protocol:

Key Advantages of the Methodology

Rapid Functional Genomics Analysis

The seed vacuum VIGS protocol significantly accelerates the pace of functional gene characterization compared to traditional genetic transformation. The system typically produces observable silencing phenotypes within 2-4 weeks post-inoculation, enabling high-throughput screening of gene functions.

Table 1: Timeframe for Silencing Phenotype Appearance in Various Species

Plant Species	First Phenotype Observation	Silencing Efficiency	Key Reference
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)	15-21 days post-infiltration	62-91% (genotype-dependent)	[4]
Atriplex (Atriplex canescens)	~15 days post-inoculation	~16.4% (phenotypic)	[14]
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)	During seed germination	Better in belowground tissues	[5]
Soybean (Glycine max)	21 days post-inoculation	65-95%	[3]
California Poppy (Eschscholzia californica)	<2 weeks after infiltration	92% of plants showed silencing	[15]

Whole-Plant Level Silencing

This methodology facilitates systemic silencing throughout the plant, enabling functional analysis in diverse tissues and organs. The TRV vector moves efficiently through the vascular system, reaching meristematic tissues and newly emerging leaves that are often recalcitrant to other transformation methods.

Research in sunflower demonstrates that the vacuum infiltration protocol enables extensive viral spreading, with TRV detected in leaves up to node 9 in infected plants [4]. In wheat and maize, the method produces whole-plant level gene silencing, including typical photo-bleaching symptoms in leaves, making it suitable for studying genes involved in various physiological processes [16] [17].

Applicability to Non-Model and Recalcitrant Species

The technique is particularly valuable for plant species that are difficult to transform using conventional methods. It bypasses the need for in vitro regeneration and stable transformation, which are major bottlenecks in functional genomics of non-model species.

Table 2: Application in Diverse Plant Species

Plant Type	Species	Key Achievement	Infiltration Method
Oilseed Crop	Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)	Overcame transformation challenges; genotype-dependent efficiency	Seed vacuum
Halophytic Model	Atriplex (Atriplex canescens)	Established first VIGS system for stress-resistance studies	Vacuum-assisted (0.5 kPa, 10 min)
Cereal Crops	Wheat & Maize	Whole-plant silencing in monocots; resistance to powdery mildew	Seed vacuum with novel infiltration solution
Woody Species	Populus spp., Olea europaea	Successfully applied in forest trees	Various VIGS methods
Basal Eudicot	California Poppy (Eschscholzia californica)	Effective gene downregulation in basal eudicot	Agroinfiltration

The genotype-dependent response noted in sunflower, with infection percentages varying from 62% to 91% among different genotypes, highlights the importance of protocol optimization for specific species [4]. Nevertheless, the methodology has proven adaptable across a broad phylogenetic range, from basal eudicots like California poppy to monocot crops like wheat and maize [16] [15].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Seed Vacuum VIGS Protocol for Sunflower

This protocol, adapted from recent sunflower research, achieves up to 91% infection efficiency in optimal genotypes [4].

Step 1: Vector Construction and Agrobacterium Preparation

• Clone a 193-bp fragment of the target gene (e.g., phytoene desaturase, PDS) into the TRV2 vector using appropriate restriction sites (XbaI and BamHI)
• Transform recombinant TRV2 and helper TRV1 plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101
• Prepare Agrobacterium cultures by growing single colonies in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8
• Centrifuge bacterial cultures and resuspend in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl₂) to OD600 = 0.8-1.0
• Mix TRV1 and TRV2 Agrobacterium suspensions in equal volumes and incubate at room temperature in darkness for 3-4 hours

Step 2: Seed Preparation and Vacuum Infiltration

• Partially remove seed coats to enhance infiltration efficiency
• Submerge seeds in the Agrobacterium suspension in a vacuum desiccator
• Apply vacuum (0.5-1.0 kPa) for 10-15 minutes, then slowly release to allow thorough infiltration
• For sunflower, optimal parameters include vacuum infiltration followed by 6 hours of co-cultivation [4]

Step 3: Co-cultivation and Plant Growth

• After infiltration, transfer seeds to co-cultivation medium or moist vermiculite
• Co-cultivate for 2-3 days in darkness at 22°C
• Transplant treated seeds to soil mixture (3:1 peat:perlite) and grow under standard greenhouse conditions (22°C, 18-h light/6-h dark photoperiod, ~45% relative humidity)
• Monitor plants for silencing phenotypes beginning at approximately 15 days post-infiltration

Modified Protocol for Monocot Species

For challenging monocot species like wheat and maize, researchers have developed a specialized protocol using a novel infiltration solution [16] [17].

Key Modifications for Monocots:

• Use of an optimized infiltration solution containing acetosyringone, cysteine, and Tween 20
• Infiltration of pre-germinated seeds with radicle length of 1-3 cm
• Vacuum application at 0.5 kPa for 10 minutes
• This system has successfully silenced phytoene desaturase (PDS) genes, resulting in typical photo-bleaching symptoms, and three wheat homoeoalleles of MLO simultaneously, conferring resistance to powdery mildew [16]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Seed Vacuum VIGS

Reagent/Vector	Function/Purpose	Example Specifications
TRV1 Plasmid	Encodes viral replicase and movement proteins	pYL192 (TRV1, Addgene #148968)
TRV2 Plasmid	Carries target gene fragment for silencing	pYL156 (TRV2; Addgene #148969)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	Vector delivery system	Strain GV3101
Infiltration Buffer	Facilitates bacterial infection	10 mM MES, 200 µM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl₂
Acetosyringone	Induces Agrobacterium virulence genes	200 μM in infiltration buffer
Selection Antibiotics	Maintains plasmid selection	Kanamycin (50 μg/mL), Gentamicin (10 μg/mL), Rifampicin (100 μg/mL)
PDS Gene Fragment	Visual marker for silencing efficiency	193-bp fragment for sunflower; 300-400 bp for other species

Critical Factors for Experimental Success

Optimization Parameters

Successful implementation of seed vacuum VIGS requires careful optimization of several parameters:

• Bacterial Density: Optimal OD600 typically ranges from 0.8 to 1.0 for the infiltration suspension [4] [14]
• Vacuum Duration and Pressure: Effective parameters range from 10-15 minutes at 0.5-1.0 kPa [4] [14]
• Co-cultivation Time: A 6-hour co-cultivation period proved most effective for sunflower [4]
• Plant Developmental Stage: Germinated seeds with radicle length of 1-3 cm are generally optimal [14]
• Genotype Selection: Susceptibility to TRV VIGS infection varies significantly among genotypes, with efficiency ranging from 62% to 91% in different sunflower lines [4]

Troubleshooting Common Issues

• Low Infection Rates: Increase vacuum duration; optimize bacterial density; enhance seed coat removal
• Patchy Silencing: Ensure uniform infiltration; optimize co-cultivation conditions
• Plant Stress Response: Monitor environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, light intensity)
• Unspecific Phenotypes: Include multiple controls; verify target specificity of inserted fragment

The experimental workflow from target selection to phenotypic analysis can be visualized as follows:

The seed vacuum VIGS infiltration protocol represents a transformative methodology in plant functional genomics, particularly valuable for its speed, whole-plant systemic silencing, and remarkable applicability to non-model species. By enabling rapid gene characterization without the need for stable transformation, this approach accelerates the pace of gene discovery in agriculturally important crops and phylogenetically significant species. The continued optimization of this protocol across diverse plant taxa will further expand its utility in fundamental research and applied crop improvement programs.

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) using Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) vectors has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional analysis of plant genes. Unlike stable genetic transformation, TRV-VIGS offers a transient silencing approach that circumvents the need for laborious transformation procedures, enabling high-throughput gene function studies even in genetically recalcitrant species [3]. The seed vacuum infiltration protocol represents a significant methodological advancement, allowing for whole-plant level gene silencing starting from early developmental stages. This technique has been successfully adapted for diverse plant species, including monocots and dicots, by optimizing key parameters such as vacuum duration, co-cultivation time, and Agrobacterium concentration [4] [17].

The fundamental principle underlying TRV-VIGS involves engineering TRV vectors to carry fragments of host target genes. When introduced into plants via Agrobacterium-mediated delivery, the recombinant virus triggers the plant's innate post-transcriptional gene silencing machinery, leading to sequence-specific degradation of endogenous mRNA transcripts [18]. The bipartite nature of the TRV genome, consisting of RNA1 (responsible for replication and movement) and RNA2 (engineered to carry host gene fragments), provides a flexible platform for genetic manipulation while maintaining viral viability and systemic spread [19] [20].

TRV Vector Systems and Modifications

Conventional Bipartite TRV Vectors

The standard TRV-VIGS system employs two separate T-DNA binary vectors:

• pTRV1: Contains genes for viral replication (134K and 194K proteins), movement protein (MP), and a silencing suppressor (16K protein) [19] [20].
• pTRV2: Engineered to carry the gene of interest fragment inserted into multiple cloning sites, along with genes for coat protein (CP) and non-structural proteins (2b, 2c) [19].

These vectors are typically co-delivered through Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101, which transfers the T-DNA containing viral genomes into plant cells [4] [3]. The pTRV2 vector has been modified to enhance its utility, with common versions including pYL156 (Addgene #148969) containing restriction sites for convenient insertion of target gene fragments [4].

Advanced Vector Modifications and All-in-One Systems

Recent advancements have addressed the limitation of handling two separate vectors by developing all-in-one TRV systems. The VS2 system incorporates both RNA1 and RNA2 components into a single T-DNA vector, significantly simplifying the Agrobacterium preparation and infiltration process [21]. This unified system maintains silencing efficiency comparable to conventional bipartite vectors while reducing experimental workload.

Further TRV modifications have expanded their functionality beyond silencing:

• TRVe vectors: Engineered for simultaneous expression of two heterologous proteins through gene substitution strategies, enabling systemic co-expression of fusion-free foreign proteins [20].
• Vox vectors: Modified for virus-mediated overexpression (VOX) applications [21].
• Vige vectors: Adapted for virus-induced genome editing (VIGE) using CRISPR/Cas systems [21].

Table 1: Comparison of TRV Vector Systems and Their Applications

Vector System	Key Components	Primary Application	Notable Features	Reference
Conventional TRV	pTRV1 + pTRV2 vectors	VIGS	Bipartite system; Well-established protocol	[19] [4]
All-in-One VS2	Single vector with RNA1+RNA2	VIGS	Simplified handling; High co-delivery efficiency	[21]
TRVe	Modified pTRV2 with gene substitution	Dual protein expression	Systemic expression of two fusion-free proteins	[20]
Multifunctional Toolkit	pVT, pVO, pVE derivatives	VATE, VOX, VIGE	Unified cloning method for multiple applications	[21]

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for TRV-VIGS Experiments

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose	Application Notes
TRV Vectors	pYL192 (TRV1), pYL156 (TRV2), pTRV2-GFP derivatives	Vehicle for delivering target gene fragments	Available from Addgene; pTRV2 derivatives carry gene-specific inserts	[4] [3]
Agrobacterium Strains	GV3101	T-DNA delivery into plant cells	Standard strain for agroinfiltration; compatible with binary TRV vectors	[4] [3] [22]
Antibiotics	Kanamycin (50 µg/mL), Gentamicin (10 µg/mL), Rifampicin (100 µg/mL)	Selection of transformed Agrobacterium	Concentration varies based on resistance markers in vectors and strain	[4]
Infiltration Solutions	Acetosyringone, Cysteine, Tween 20	Enhance Agrobacterium infection efficiency	Acetosyringone induces vir genes; surfactants improve tissue penetration	[17]
Visual Marker Genes	Phytoene Desaturase (PDS), Cloroplastos Alterados 1 (CLA1)	Silencing efficiency indicators	PDS silencing causes photobleaching; CLA1 silencing causes albino phenotype	[4] [18] [23]

Agrobacterium Strains and Cultivation Conditions

The success of TRV-VIGS largely depends on the proper preparation and use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens as the delivery vehicle. The strain GV3101 is predominantly used across multiple studies due to its high transformation efficiency and reliable T-DNA transfer capability [4] [3] [22]. Optimal cultivation involves growing transformed Agrobacterium on LB-agar plates containing appropriate antibiotics (typically 50 µg/mL kanamycin, 10 µg/mL gentamicin, and 100 µg/mL rifampicin) at 28°C for 1.5-2 days [4].

For infiltration, bacterial cultures are resuspended in infiltration buffers containing acetosyringone (200-400 µM), which induces vir gene expression essential for T-DNA transfer [17]. The optimal optical density at 600 nm (OD600) for infiltration varies by species, typically ranging from 0.3-2.0, with studies recommending OD600 = 1.0-1.5 for sunflower and OD600 = 1.1 for walnut [4] [23]. Critical factors affecting Agrobacterium viability and infectivity include:

• Culture age: Log-phase cultures (OD600 ≈ 1.0-1.5) generally show highest infectivity
• Induction time: Acetosyringone induction for several hours enhances T-DNA transfer
• Temperature: Lower temperatures (19-22°C) during co-cultivation improve survival and gene transfer

Plant Materials and Species-Specific Considerations

The application of TRV-VIGS across diverse plant species requires careful consideration of genotype-dependent responses, developmental stages, and growth conditions. Recent studies have successfully established TRV-VIGS in both model and non-model species, including sunflower, soybean, walnut, Lycoris, cannabis, and cereals [4] [3] [18].

Table 3: Plant Materials and Optimization Parameters for TRV-VIGS Across Species

Plant Species	Successful Genotypes/Cultivars	Optimal Infiltration Method	Key Optimization Parameters	Silencing Efficiency
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)	'Smart SM-64B', 'ZS', 'Buzuluk'	Seed vacuum infiltration	6 h co-cultivation; peeled seed coats	62-91% (genotype-dependent)	[4]
Soybean (Glycine max)	'Tianlong 1'	Cotyledon node immersion	20-30 min immersion; bisected seeds	65-95%	[3]
Walnut (Juglans regia)	'Xiangling', 'Qingxiang'	Spray infiltration, leaf injection	OD600 = 1.1; 255 bp fragment length	Up to 48%	[23]
Cannabis (Cannabis sativa)	'MF-219', 'MF-169', 'MF-71'	Vacuum infiltration (superior to syringe)	310 bp PDS fragment from center of mRNA	Limited systemic spread	[22]
Wheat & Maize	'Xiaoyan 22', 'Zhengdan 958'	Vacuum of germinated seeds	Novel infiltration solution with acetosyringone, cysteine, Tween 20	Whole-plant level silencing	[17]
Lycoris (Lycoris chinensis)	Spring-leafed varieties	Leaf tip needle injection	1-2 mL bacterial solution; 15-20 s per leaf	Higher for LcCLA1 than LcPDS	[18]

Species-specific optimization is critical for successful VIGS. In sunflower, genotype significantly influences both infection percentage (62-91%) and silencing spread, with 'Smart SM-64B' showing the highest infection rate (91%) but limited phenotype spreading [4]. For soybean, conventional infiltration methods often fail due to thick cuticles and dense trichomes, necessitating specialized approaches like cotyledon node immersion [3]. Woody species like walnut require extended time for silencing phenotype manifestation (4-6 weeks) compared to herbaceous species (2-3 weeks) [23].

Experimental Workflow for Seed Vacuum VIGS Infiltration

The seed vacuum VIGS protocol involves a coordinated series of steps from vector preparation to phenotypic analysis, with critical optimization points at each stage to ensure efficient systemic silencing.

TRV Vector Construction and Agrobacterium Transformation

The initial phase involves engineering TRV2 vectors to carry target gene fragments and introducing them into Agrobacterium:

• Fragment Selection: Identify optimal 100-300 bp fragment from target gene using siRNA prediction tools (e.g., pssRNAit) to ensure high silencing efficiency [4].
• Vector Assembly: Amplify fragment from genomic DNA or cDNA using high-fidelity polymerase and clone into TRV2 vector (e.g., pYL156) using appropriate restriction sites (XbaI/BamHI) or recombination-based cloning [4] [21].
• Agrobacterium Transformation: Introduce recombinant plasmids into Agrobacterium GV3101 via electroporation or freeze-thaw method, followed by selection on LB plates with appropriate antibiotics [4].

Seed Vacuum Infiltration and Co-cultivation

This critical phase introduces the TRV vectors into plant tissues:

• Bacterial Culture Preparation: Grow transformed Agrobacterium in liquid LB medium with antibiotics to OD600 = 0.8-1.5, pellet cells, and resuspend in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 μM acetosyringone, pH 5.6) [4] [17].
• Bacterial Mixture Preparation: Mix pTRV1 and pTRV2 Agrobacterium cultures in 1:1 ratio, induce with acetosyringone for 2-4 hours at room temperature [3].
• Seed Preparation: For species with hard seed coats (e.g., sunflower), carefully peel seed coats to enhance infiltration efficiency without damaging embryos [4].
• Vacuum Infiltration: Submerge seeds in Agrobacterium suspension and apply vacuum (0.5-1.0 bar) for 2-5 minutes, then slowly release vacuum to ensure thorough infiltration [4] [17].
• Co-cultivation: Transfer infiltrated seeds to co-cultivation medium or moist filter papers and incubate in dark for 12 hours to 6 days (optimal duration varies by species; 6 hours for sunflower) [4].

Plant Growth and Silencing Efficiency Analysis

The final phase involves monitoring and validating silencing effects:

• Plant Growth: Transfer co-cultivated seeds to soil or growth medium and maintain under controlled environmental conditions (typically 22°C, 16/8h light/dark cycle) [4] [23].
• Phenotypic Monitoring: Observe plants for virus infection symptoms (appearing 1-2 weeks post-infiltration) followed by target gene silencing phenotypes (2-6 weeks depending on species) [4] [23].
• Molecular Validation: Quantify silencing efficiency through:
  • qRT-PCR: Measure transcript levels of target genes in silenced tissues compared to controls [18] [23].
  • TRV Detection: Confirm systemic viral spread using RT-PCR with TRV coat protein-specific primers [4] [22].
• Additional Analyses: For functional studies, assess downstream effects including morphological changes, altered metabolite profiles, or modified stress responses [3] [17].

Troubleshooting and Optimization Guidelines

Successful implementation of seed vacuum VIGS requires attention to potential challenges:

• Low Infection Efficiency: Optimize vacuum pressure and duration; ensure seed coats are properly prepared for infiltration; verify Agrobacterium viability and concentration [4] [22].
• Limited Systemic Silencing: Extend co-cultivation period; optimize plant growth conditions post-infiltration; validate TRV movement through molecular detection in upper leaves [4] [22].
• Genotype-Dependent Response: Test multiple genotypes of target species; adjust infiltration parameters for recalcitrant varieties [4] [23].
• Unspecific Phenotypes: Include empty vector controls and multiple biological replicates; confirm silencing specificity through molecular analysis [3] [23].

The TRV-VIGS system, particularly when combined with seed vacuum infiltration, provides a robust platform for rapid gene function analysis across diverse plant species. By carefully selecting appropriate vectors, Agrobacterium strains, plant materials, and optimization parameters, researchers can effectively leverage this technology to accelerate functional genomics studies in both model and non-model plants.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Optimized Seed Vacuum VIGS Protocol

Within the broader research on optimizing seed vacuum infiltration for Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), the construction of the recombinant viral vector is a critical foundational step. The efficiency of the entire VIGS experiment hinges on the successful cloning of a target gene fragment into the delivery vector. The Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-based system, particularly the binary pTRV2 vector, has emerged as a predominant tool due to its wide host range and ability to invade meristematic tissues [24]. This protocol details the methodologies for inserting target sequences into the TRV2 vector, a process essential for enabling subsequent Agrobacterium-mediated delivery via seed vacuum infiltration in non-model plant species [4] [25].

TRV2 Vector Systems and Cloning Strategies

The choice of cloning strategy for the pTRV2 vector impacts the throughput, cost, and efficiency of vector construction. The table below summarizes the key cloning methods developed for the TRV2 vector.

Table 1: Comparison of Cloning Strategies for TRV2 Vectors

Cloning Method	Principle	Key Features	Advantages	Disadvantages
Restriction Enzyme & Ligation [4]	Uses restriction enzymes (e.g., XbaI, BamHI) to open the vector, followed by ligation of the compatible insert.	Traditional method; requires specific restriction sites.	Universally accessible; low cost for small-scale work.	Time-consuming; limited by availability of unique restriction sites; low efficiency for high-throughput work.
Gateway Recombination [26] [24]	Uses site-specific recombination between att sites on the vector and the PCR product.	High efficiency; directional cloning.	Highly efficient; suitable for creating large libraries of silencing vectors.	Requires proprietary enzymes (Clonase), which can be costly [26].
Ligation-Independent Cloning (LIC) [26] [24]	Uses T4 DNA polymerase to create complementary single-stranded overhangs on the vector and insert.	Does not require ligase; uses enzymatic treatment to create sticky ends.	No ligase needed; highly accurate and efficient (can achieve 100% efficiency for correct inserts); cost-effective for high-throughput applications [26].	Requires careful design of LIC adapters and primers.

The following diagram illustrates the general decision-making workflow for selecting and executing a TRV2 cloning strategy, culminating in the final Agrobacterium-ready recombinant vector for plant inoculation.

Detailed Cloning Workflows

Restriction Enzyme and Ligation-Based Cloning

This method is ideal for laboratories beginning with VIGS or working with a limited number of target genes. The following workflow provides a detailed, actionable protocol.

Protocol Steps:

• Fragment Selection and Primer Design: Select a target gene fragment of 300-400 bp using online tools like pssRNAit [4] or SGN-VIGS [25] to ensure high silencing efficiency and specificity. Design primers to amplify this fragment, appending the appropriate restriction enzyme sites (e.g., XbaI and BamHI) to the 5' ends.

  • Example Primer Sequence:
    • Forward: 5'-TAATTCTAGAATGGCATTTTTAGATGGCAGCCC-3' (contains XbaI site)
    • Reverse: 5'-TAATGGATCCTGGAGTAGCAAATACATAAGCATCCCC-3' (contains BamHI site) [4]

• PCR Amplification: Amplify the target fragment from cDNA or genomic DNA using a high-fidelity DNA polymerase.

• Restriction Digestion:

  • Set up separate digestion reactions for the purified PCR product and the pTRV2 plasmid.
  • Reaction Mix:
    • 1 µg DNA (PCR product or pTRV2 plasmid)
    • 1 µL of each restriction enzyme (e.g., XbaI and BamHI)
    • 2 µL 10x Restriction Enzyme Buffer
    • Nuclease-free water to 20 µL.
  • Incubate at 37°C for 2 hours, followed by 80°C for 5 minutes to heat-inactivate the enzymes [4].

• Ligation:

  • Mix the digested and purified vector and insert fragment in a 1:5 molar ratio.
  • Reaction Mix:
    • 50 ng of digested pTRV2 vector
    • Appropriate amount of insert fragment
    • 100 units of T4 DNA Ligase
    • 2 µL 10x Overnight Ligation Buffer
    • Nuclease-free water to 20 µL.
  • Incubate at room temperature or 16°C for several hours or overnight [4].

• Transformation and Screening: Transform the ligation product into competent E. coli cells (e.g., strain dH5α) and plate onto LB agar containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin. Select positive colonies for PCR and restriction analysis to verify correct insertion.

Ligation-Independent Cloning (LIC)

The LIC method is superior for high-throughput projects, offering high efficiency and avoiding ligase.

Protocol Steps:

• Vector Preparation: The TRV2-LIC vector (e.g., pYY13) contains a LIC cassette with a ccdB negative selection gene flanked by LIC adaptor sequences. Digest the vector with PstI to linearize it and then treat with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dATP. This creates specific, complementary overhangs on the vector ends [26].

• Insert Preparation: Amplify the target fragment using primers that have the corresponding LIC adaptor sequences at their 5' ends. Treat the purified PCR product with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dTTP to generate complementary overhangs.

• Annealing: Mix the treated vector and insert fragments. The complementary overhangs will anneal, creating a circular, hybrid molecule that is ready for transformation.

• Transformation and Screening: Transform the annealed product directly into E. coli. The ccdB gene in the non-recombinant vector will kill the host cells, allowing only recombinant colonies with the inserted fragment to grow. This results in a very high (near 100%) efficiency of obtaining correct clones [26].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for TRV2 Cloning

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for TRV Vector Construction and VIGS

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Experiment	Examples / Specifications
Binary TRV Vectors	Core system for delivering silencing fragments into the plant genome via Agrobacterium.	pYL192 (TRV1, Addgene #148968), pYL156 (TRV2, Addgene #148969) [4]; pTRV2-LIC [26].
Restriction Enzymes	Precise cutting of vector and insert for ligation-based cloning.	FastDigest enzymes (e.g., XbaI, BamHI, EcoRI, XhoI) [4] [3].
DNA Ligase	Joins the digested vector and insert fragments.	T4 DNA Ligase [4].
High-Fidelity Polymerase	Accurate amplification of the target gene fragment without introducing mutations.	Tersus Plus PCR kit [4].
Competent Cells	For plasmid propagation and amplification.	E. coli dH5α [4].
Agrobacterium Strain	The final host for the recombinant TRV vectors, used for plant inoculation.	A. tumefaciens GV3101 [4] [3] [25].
Infiltration Buffer	Suspension medium for Agrobacterium during inoculation, enhancing infection efficiency.	10 mM MES, 200 µM Acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl₂, 0.03% Silwet-77 [25].
Selection Antibiotics	Selection of bacterial cells containing the recombinant plasmids.	Kanamycin (for TRV vectors), Rifampicin, Gentamicin (for Agrobacterium strain) [4] [25].

The construction of a functional TRV2 vector by cloning a target fragment is a critical step that determines the success of a seed vacuum VIGS experiment. The choice between restriction enzyme cloning and more modern LIC techniques should be guided by the project's scale, available resources, and required throughput. A meticulously constructed vector ensures high silencing efficiency when combined with optimized seed vacuum infiltration protocols, ultimately accelerating functional gene characterization in recalcitrant plant species.

Within the broader scope of developing a robust seed vacuum Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) infiltration protocol, the preparation of the Agrobacterium suspension constitutes a critical foundational step. The genetic transformation efficiency, and consequently the success of the entire VIGS procedure, is highly dependent on the precise optimization of bacterial culture conditions and the formulation of the final infiltration medium. This protocol details standardized methods for preparing high-quality Agrobacterium cultures and infiltration suspensions, tailored specifically for seed vacuum VIGS applications, drawing on optimized parameters from recent studies in various plant species.

Core Protocol: Culture and Suspension Preparation

Agrobacterium Culture Conditions

Initiate the process from a glycerol stock of the recombinant Agrobacterium strain (e.g., GV3101, GV1301, or EHA105) harboring the VIGS vectors (pTRV1 and pTRV2 with target gene insert) [3] [27].

• Streaking and Plate Culture: Streak the glycerol stock onto a solidified Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plate supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics (e.g., 50 µg/mL kanamycin, 25 µg/mL rifampicin for GV1301; 50 µg/mL kanamycin, 20 µg/mL rifampicin for EHA105) based on the vector and strain resistance [28] [27]. Incubate the plate at 28–29°C for 36–48 hours until single colonies form.
• Starter Liquid Culture: Select a single colony and inoculate it into a small volume (e.g., 4–50 mL) of liquid LB medium with the same antibiotics. Incubate this starter culture at 28°C with constant shaking at 180–200 rpm for approximately 16–24 hours (overnight) [29].
• Secondary Liquid Culture: Dilute the starter culture into a larger volume of fresh, antibiotic-supplemented LB medium. The typical starting optical density at 600 nm (OD600) for this culture is 0.05–0.1 [4]. Continue incubation at 28°C with shaking until the bacterial growth reaches the target OD600 for infiltration.

Table 1: Optimized Agrobacterium Culture Parameters from Recent studies

Plant Species	Agrobacterium Strain	Target OD₆₀₀	Culture Medium	Antibiotics	Citation
Sunflower (Seed Vacuum)	GV3101	0.8	LB	Kanamycin (50 µg/mL), Rifampicin [4]
Soybean (TRV-VIGS)	GV3101	>1.0 (adjusted after resuspension)	LB	Kanamycin (50 µg/mL), Rifampicin [3]
Nicotiana benthamiana (Root Wounding)	GV1301	>1.0 (adjusted after resuspension)	LB	Kanamycin (50 µg/mL), Rifampicin (25 µg/mL) [27]
Broomcorn Millet	EHA105	1.0	LB	Kanamycin (50 mg/L), Rifampicin (20 mg/L) [28]
Arabidopsis (Vacuum Infiltration)	Various	1.2 - 1.8	YEP	Relevant antibiotics [29]

Infiltration Suspension Formulation

The final suspension for plant infiltration uses a defined medium, not the nutrient-rich culture medium, to avoid phytotoxicity and support the transformation process.

• Harvesting Bacteria: When the main culture reaches the desired OD600, pellet the bacterial cells by centrifugation at 5000–6000 × g for 10–15 minutes at room temperature [29].
• Resuspension Medium: Gently decant the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in an infiltration or induction medium. A common and effective base medium is 10 mM MgCl₂ with 10 mM MES buffer, adjusted to pH 5.6–5.7 with KOH [27] [29].
• Adjusting Final Density: Dilute the concentrated bacterial suspension with the infiltration medium to the precise final OD600 required for the specific VIGS protocol. The optimal density varies by plant species and method, as detailed in Table 2.
• Addition of Inducers: To maximize the virulence of Agrobacterium, add acetosyringone to the final suspension. A common working concentration is 150–200 µM [28] [27]. The suspension should be incubated with this inducer for a period, typically 1–3 hours in the dark at 28°C with gentle shaking, before use [27].

Table 2: Optimized Infiltration Suspension Formulations for Different VIGS Methods

Method / Plant Species	Final OD₆₀₀	Infiltration Medium	Acetosyringone	Incubation	Citation
Seed Vacuum (Sunflower)	0.8	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6	150–200 µM	3 hours, dark [4]
Cotyledon Node (Soybean)	Adjusted to target OD	Agrobacterium resuspension solution	200 µM	Not specified [3]
Root Wounding-Immersion	0.8	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6	150 µM	3 hours, dark [27]
Leaf Infiltration (General)	0.4 - 1.5	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6	200 µM	2–4 hours, dark [1]
Hairy Root Induction	0.6 - 1.0	MS Basal Salt Medium	100 µM	Used during co-cultivation [30]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents for Agrobacterium Preparation

Reagent / Solution	Function / Purpose	Typical Working Concentration
LB (Luria-Bertani) Broth/Agar	Standard complex medium for robust growth of Agrobacterium cultures.	As per standard formulation (10 g/L Tryptone, 5 g/L Yeast Extract, 10 g/L NaCl)
YEP Medium	An alternative rich medium for Agrobacterium culture, sometimes used for high-density growth.	10 g/L Yeast Extract, 10 g/L Peptone, 5 g/L NaCl [29]
MES Buffer	A biological buffer used in the infiltration medium to maintain an acidic pH, which is crucial for inducing Agrobacterium virulence.	10 mM [27]
MgCl₂	Provides essential divalent cations, helping to maintain bacterial cell integrity and supporting the transformation process in the infiltration medium.	10 mM [27]
Acetosyringone	A phenolic compound that activates the Agrobacterium Vir genes, essential for efficient T-DNA transfer into the plant cell.	100 - 200 µM [28] [4] [27]
Antibiotics (e.g., Kanamycin, Rifampicin)	Selective pressure to maintain the VIGS vector plasmids in Agrobacterium and prevent contamination.	Strain and vector-dependent (e.g., Kanamycin 50 µg/mL, Rifampicin 25-50 µg/mL) [3] [27]

Workflow and Pathway Visualization

Within the framework of developing a robust seed vacuum VIGS infiltration protocol, the precise optimization of key physical and biological parameters is critical for achieving high transformation efficiency. This protocol details the systematic optimization of three fundamental parameters: vacuum pressure, infiltration duration, and Agrobacterium optical density (OD600). These factors collectively determine the efficacy of Agrobacterium delivery into plant tissues, directly influencing viral vector spread and subsequent gene silencing efficiency. The methodologies and data presented herein provide a standardized approach for researchers to maximize VIGS efficacy across diverse plant species, particularly non-model and recalcitrant species where traditional transformation methods face significant challenges.

Optimized Parameters Across Plant Systems

The optimal combination of vacuum pressure, duration, and Agrobacterium concentration varies significantly across plant species and experimental setups. The table below summarizes the key parameters optimized in various studies.

Table 1: Optimized Vacuum Infiltration Parameters for Different Plant Species

Plant Species	Optimal OD600	Vacuum Pressure	Infiltration Duration	Key Findings	Citation
Ricinus communis (Castor Bean)	1.2	0.09 MPa (≈ 675 mmHg)	20 min, release, then another 20 min	Peak transgene expression at 72 hours; significantly enhanced phloem loading of vectorized agrochemicals. [31]
Nicotiana benthamiana	0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 tested	600 mmHg	3 minutes	600 mmHg for 3 min yielded significantly higher GFP expression than 400 mmHg for 2 min. [32]
Paeonia ostii (Tree Peony)	1.0	Not specified	2 hours (infection)	Six negative-pressure treatments were optimal in an orthogonal experiment. [13]
Juglans regia (Walnut)	1.1	Not specified	Not specified (spray infiltration)	Combined with a 255 bp fragment, this OD600 achieved up to 48% silencing efficiency. [23]
Oryza sativa (Rice)	0.6 - 1.0	-0.08 MPa (≈ 600 mmHg)	10 minutes	Vacuum infiltration of germinated seeds enabled WDV-based VIGS. [33]
Persea americana (Avocado)	0.6	-0.07 MPa (≈ 525 mmHg)	5 min, release, repeated twice	Detached leaf assay; efficiency depended on leaf age and was enhanced by microwounding. [34]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol for Seed Vacuum VIGS in Sunflower

This protocol, adapted from a study that established a simple method for sunflowers, eliminates the need for in vitro recovery and can achieve infection percentages of up to 91% in certain genotypes. [4]

Materials:

• Sunflower seeds (e.g., line 'ZS' or 'Smart SM-64B')
• Recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying pTRV1 and pTRV2-derived vectors
• Infiltration medium (e.g., 10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone)
• Vacuum desiccator and pump
• Growth chamber set at 22°C with an 18/6-h light/dark photoperiod

Method:

• Seed Preparation: Carefully peel the seed coats to facilitate infiltration. No surface sterilization is required. [4]
• Agrobacterium Preparation: Inoculate single colonies of Agrobacterium carrying pTRV1 and pTRV2 into separate LB cultures with appropriate antibiotics. Grow overnight at 28°C with shaking.
• Harvest and Resuspend: Pellet the bacterial cultures by centrifugation and resuspend them in infiltration medium. Adjust the OD600 to a predetermined optimal density (e.g., 0.8-1.2).
• Mix Cultures: Combine the pTRV1 and pTRV2 Agrobacterium suspensions in a 1:1 ratio.
• Vacuum Infiltration: Submerge the peeled seeds in the combined Agrobacterium suspension. Apply a vacuum of approximately 0.08 MPa (600 mmHg) for 5-10 minutes.
• Co-cultivation: Following infiltration, subject the seeds to a 6-hour co-cultivation period in the dark. [4]
• Planting: Sow the seeds directly in a soil mixture (e.g., 3:1 peat:perlite) and grow under controlled conditions. Silencing phenotypes, such as photo-bleaching when targeting PDS, can typically be observed within 2-3 weeks. [4]

Protocol for Parameter Optimization in Castor Bean Seedlings

This protocol provides a systematic approach for optimizing vacuum infiltration parameters, as demonstrated in Ricinus seedlings. [31]

Materials:

• Ricinus communis seedlings (6 days old, endosperm removed)
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying the reporter gene (e.g., eGFP)
• Infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl₂, 200 μM acetosyringone, pH 5.6)
• Vacuum infiltration system

Method:

• Prepare Agrobacterium: Grow Agrobacterium overnight, pellet, and resuspend in infiltration buffer. Prepare suspensions with varying OD600 values (e.g., 0.6, 0.9, 1.2).
• Infiltrate Seedlings: Soak the endosperm-excised seedlings in the Agrobacterium suspension.
• Apply Vacuum: Place the container in a vacuum desiccator. Test different pressures (e.g., 0.07 MPa, 0.09 MPa) and durations (e.g., single 20-min vs. dual 20-min cycles).
• Optimal Condition Identified: The study found that infiltration at OD600 = 1.2, with a dual-cycle vacuum (0.09 MPa for 20 min, return to atmosphere, then another 20 min) yielded strong transgene expression. [31]
• Incubate and Analyze: Transfer seedlings to Hoagland solution and culture. Monitor reporter gene expression (e.g., eGFP fluorescence) over time, with peak expression expected around 72 hours post-infiltration. Use qRT-PCR to quantify expression levels. [31]

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Item	Function/Description	Example Use Case
pTRV1 & pTRV2 Vectors	Bipartite Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-based VIGS vectors. pTRV1 encodes replication proteins, while pTRV2 carries the target gene insert. [4] [1]	The most widely adopted VIGS system for its broad host range and efficient systemic movement. [3] [1]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	A disarmed strain commonly used for agroinfiltration due to high transformation efficiency. [4] [3] [23]	Standard workhorse for delivering TRV vectors into plant tissues.
Acetosyringone	A phenolic compound that induces the expression of Agrobacterium virulence (vir) genes, enhancing T-DNA transfer. [31] [13] [34]	Added to Agrobacterium cultures and infiltration media to maximize transformation efficiency.
Infiltration Buffer (MES/MgCl₂)	Provides a suitable osmotic and pH environment for Agrobacterium during the infiltration process. [31] [34]	Used to resuspend and dilute Agrobacterium pellets to the correct OD600 for infiltration.
Phytoene Desaturase (PDS)	A key enzyme in carotenoid biosynthesis. Its silencing causes a visible photo-bleaching phenotype, serving as a visual marker for VIGS efficiency. [4] [23] [33]	Used as a positive control to optimize and validate new VIGS protocols across species.

Workflow Diagram

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for optimizing critical infiltration parameters, from initial setup to final validation.

Within the broader context of developing a robust seed vacuum VIGS infiltration protocol, the steps taken immediately after agroinfiltration are critical for determining experimental success. The post-infiltration phase—encompassing co-cultivation, plant recovery, and the management of subsequent growth conditions—directly influences the efficiency of viral vector establishment and the initiation of systemic gene silencing. Proper handling during this period ensures optimal plant health, maximizes silencing efficiency, and minimizes experimental variability. This application note synthesizes detailed methodologies from established protocols across diverse plant species to provide a standardized framework for post-infiltration handling, enabling researchers to reliably apply seed vacuum VIGS in functional genomic studies and drug discovery research.

Core Post-Infiltration Workflow

The journey from agroinfiltrated seeds to plants exhibiting systemic silencing involves a series of carefully managed stages. The following diagram illustrates the complete post-infiltration workflow, from initial co-cultivation through to the final observation of silencing phenotypes.

• Co-cultivation Phase: Following vacuum infiltration, seeds are transferred onto a solid medium or kept in a moist environment to facilitate Agrobacterium-mediated transfer of the TRV vector into plant cells [4].
• Recovery & Transplanting: After co-cultivation, plant materials are rinsed to remove excess Agrobacterium and then transplanted to a standard growth substrate (e.g., soil, peat-perlite mixture) for further development [4] [3].
• Managed Growth Conditions: Transplanted seedlings are maintained under controlled environmental conditions (light, temperature, humidity) that are optimized both for plant health and for the replication and spread of the TRV vector [17] [16] [4].
• Phenotype Observation: Silencing phenotypes, such as photobleaching from PDS gene silencing, typically become visible in systemic leaves 2 to 4 weeks post-infiltration, indicating successful VIGS [3] [35].

Detailed Protocols and Parameters

Co-cultivation Conditions

Co-cultivation is a critical step that allows Agrobacterium cells in close contact with plant tissues to transfer the T-DNA containing the VIGS construct into the plant genome. The specific parameters vary depending on the plant species and the developmental stage of the material.

Table 1: Co-cultivation Parameters Across Different Plant Species

Plant Species	Co-cultivation Duration	Temperature	Medium / Conditions	Key Findings / Rationale
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)	6 hours	Not specified	Moist filter paper or directly on medium	Identified as the optimal duration for the most efficient VIGS after testing multiple timepoints [4].
Catharanthus roseus	2 days	22°C	Solid MS medium in the dark	A 2-day co-cultivation in the dark was part of a protocol leading to strong silencing phenotypes in cotyledons [35].
Soybean (Glycine max)	3 days	22°C	Tissue culture medium under a 16/8h light/dark cycle	This co-cultivation period was part of a highly efficient (65-95%) TRV-VIGS protocol via cotyledon node infection [3].
Wheat & Maize	2-3 days	Not specified	Co-cultivation medium in the dark	The vacuum and co-cultivation method enabled whole-plant level VIGS in these monocot species [17] [16].

Recovery and Growth Conditions

After co-cultivation, plants are transferred to conditions that promote recovery from the agroinfiltration stress and support robust growth, which is essential for the systemic spread of the TRV vector.

Table 2: Optimized Growth Conditions for VIGS Plants

Condition	Typical Parameter Range	Protocol Examples & Rationale
Light Cycle	16-h light / 8-h dark [17] [4]	Used for wheat, maize, and sunflower. A different study on Arabidopsis using a geminivirus VIGS vector found more extensive VIGS under short-day conditions (8-h light / 16-h dark) [36].
Light Intensity	~150 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ [17] [16]	Applied for wheat and maize growth post-infiltration.
Temperature	19-22°C [17] [4]	A consistent, moderate temperature is maintained for optimal plant growth and viral spread.
Humidity	~55% average relative humidity [17] [16]	Maintained for standard plant growth. Higher humidity (e.g., 70%) may be used for maintaining pathogens like powdery mildew [17].

The following diagram outlines the strategic management of the growth environment, highlighting how different factors are controlled to ensure successful gene silencing.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The successful implementation of the seed vacuum VIGS protocol relies on a set of core reagents and materials. The following table details these essential components and their functions within the workflow.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Seed Vacuum VIGS

Reagent / Material	Function in the Protocol	Example Specifications / Notes
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	Delivery vehicle for the TRV VIGS vector into plant cells.	Strain GV3101 is commonly used [4] [3] [35].
TRV Vectors (pTRV1, pTRV2)	The bipartite viral vector system. pTRV2 carries the target gene fragment for silencing.	Vectors such as pYL192 (TRV1) and pYL156 (TRV2) are available from addgene [4].
Infiltration Solution	Suspension medium for Agrobacterium during vacuum infiltration.	May contain acetosyringone, cysteine, and Tween 20 to enhance transformation efficiency [17] [16].
Co-cultivation Medium	Solid or moist medium to support plant tissue and Agrobacterium during T-DNA transfer.	Often based on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with agar [35].
Growth Substrate	Medium for plant growth after recovery.	A 3:1 ratio of peat to perlite is used for sunflowers [4]; standard soil mixtures for other species.

The period immediately following the vacuum infiltration of seeds is a deterministic phase in the VIGS pipeline. Meticulous attention to the protocols for co-cultivation, recovery, and the management of growth conditions is not merely a procedural formality but a fundamental requirement for achieving high-efficiency, whole-plant level gene silencing. The parameters and workflows detailed herein, compiled from successful applications in species ranging from monocot cereals to dicot medicinal plants, provide a validated roadmap for researchers. Adherence to these guidelines will significantly enhance the reliability and reproducibility of VIGS experiments, thereby accelerating functional gene validation in the context of crop improvement and drug development.

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional gene analysis in plants, particularly for species lacking efficient stable transformation systems. This post-transcriptional gene silencing mechanism utilizes recombinant viral vectors to trigger sequence-specific degradation of target endogenous plant mRNAs [1]. The technique is especially valuable for studying non-model plants, as it enables high-throughput gene function characterization without the need for stable genetic transformation [37] [38].

Among various viral vectors, the Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-based VIGS system has gained widespread adoption due to its broad host range, efficient systemic movement, mild viral symptoms, and ability to target meristematic tissues [1] [39]. However, successful implementation of VIGS requires extensive optimization of protocol parameters for different plant species, as factors including transformation efficiency, viral mobility, and plant defense responses vary significantly across taxonomic groups [4].

This application note provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of TRV-VIGS protocol variations optimized for three economically important species: sunflower (Helianthus annuus), soybean (Glycine max), and tea plant (Camellia sinensis). By synthesizing optimized methodologies and critical parameters, this resource aims to support researchers in implementing efficient VIGS systems for functional genomics studies in these species.

Comparative Analysis of Optimized VIGS Protocols

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Optimized VIGS Protocols Across Three Plant Species

Parameter	Sunflower	Soybean	Tea Plant
Primary Inoculation Method	Seed vacuum infiltration	Cotyledon node immersion	Vacuum infiltration (whole plant/tepal)
Agrobacterium Strain	GV3101	GV3101	Not specified
Optical Density (OD₆₀₀)	Not specified	0.6	1.0
Co-cultivation Duration	6 hours	20-30 minutes immersion	Not specified
Infection Efficiency	62-91% (genotype-dependent)	65-95%	~85% (tepal)
Key Additives	Acetosyringone (200 µM)	Acetosyringone (200 µM)	Acetosyringone (200 µM)
Silencing Onset	Not specified	21 days post-inoculation	12-25 days post-infiltration
Reporter Gene	HaPDS (phytoene desaturase)	GmPDS	CsPOR1 (protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase)
Genotype Dependency	High (62-91% range)	Moderate (cultivar-dependent)	Not reported
Specialized Steps	Seed coat peeling	Cotyledon bisection for half-seed explants	Inflorescence basal plate injection

Table 1: Summary of optimized VIGS parameters for sunflower [4], soybean [3], and tea plant [37] [38].

The comparative analysis reveals both shared principles and species-specific adaptations in VIGS protocol optimization. Agrobacterium strain GV3101 is commonly employed across systems, and acetosyringone is consistently used as a virulence inducer at 200µM concentration [4] [3] [14]. However, significant variations exist in the primary inoculation methods, reflecting morphological and physiological differences between species.

Sunflower protocols utilize seed vacuum infiltration followed by 6 hours of co-cultivation, achieving infection rates of 62-91% depending on genotype [4]. Soybean optimization addressed challenges posed by thick cuticles and dense trichomes through cotyledon node immersion of half-seed explants for 20-30 minutes [3]. Tea plant VIGS employs vacuum infiltration of whole plants or specific tissues like tepals, with higher Agrobacterium density (OD₆₀₀=1.0) required for effective transformation [37] [38].

Species-Specific Experimental Protocols

Sunflower VIGS Protocol

The sunflower VIGS protocol employs a seed vacuum infiltration approach that eliminates requirements for in vitro recovery or surface sterilization steps [4]. The methodology centers on the following detailed procedures:

Construct Preparation: The phytoene desaturase (HaPDS) gene fragment (193bp) is cloned into the TRV2 vector (pYL156) using XbaI and BamHI restriction sites. Recombinant plasmids are transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 via electroporation [4].

Plant Material Preparation: Sunflower seeds are peeled to remove seed coats, exposing the embryonic tissues for improved Agrobacterium access. The peeling step is critical for enhancing infection efficiency [4].

Agrobacterium Culture Preparation:

• Transformed Agrobacterium colonies are cultured in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics (kanamycin 50µg/mL, gentamicin 10µg/mL, rifampicin 100µg/mL) at 28°C for 1.5 days [4].
• Bacterial suspensions are prepared in infiltration buffer (10mM MES, 200µM acetosyringone, 10mM MgCl₂) to optimal density [4].
• TRV1 and TRV2-HaPDS suspensions are mixed in equal volumes and incubated for 3 hours in darkness at room temperature to activate virulence genes [4].

Vacuum Infiltration:

• Peeled seeds are submerged in the Agrobacterium suspension mixture [4].
• Vacuum is applied at 0.5 kPa for 10 minutes to evacuate air from seed intercellular spaces [4].
• Vacuum release enables suspension infiltration through seed tissues [4].

Co-cultivation and Plant Growth: Infiltrated seeds undergo 6 hours of co-cultivation before transplantation into soil mixture (3:1 peat:perlite). Plants are maintained at 22°C with 18-hour light/6-hour dark photoperiod and 45% relative humidity [4].

Soybean VIGS Protocol

The soybean VIGS protocol utilizes a cotyledon node immersion method optimized to overcome barriers posed by thick cuticles and dense leaf trichomes [3]:

Vector Construction: Target gene fragments (GmPDS, GmRpp6907, GmRPT4) are amplified with specific primers and cloned into pTRV2-GFP vector using EcoRI and XhoI restriction sites. Constructs are transformed into Agrobacterium GV3101 [3].

Seed Preparation:

• Soybean seeds are surface-sterilized and soaked in sterile water until swollen [3].
• Seeds are bisected longitudinally to create half-seed explants, exposing the cotyledonary node for efficient Agrobacterium access [3].

Agroinfiltration:

• Half-seed explants are immersed in Agrobacterium suspension (OD₆₀₀=0.6) for 20-30 minutes with gentle agitation [3].
• Explants are blotted dry and transferred to tissue culture media for recovery [3].

Efficiency Validation: GFP fluorescence is monitored at 4 days post-infection to verify transformation efficiency, with successful transformation showing fluorescence in 2-3 cell layers initially, spreading to >80% of cells [3].

Phenotypic Monitoring: Silencing phenotypes (e.g., photobleaching for GmPDS) typically appear within 21 days post-inoculation, beginning in cluster buds before spreading to other tissues [3].

Tea Plant VIGS Protocol

The tea plant VIGS protocol employs vacuum infiltration for whole-plant transformation or specific tissue targeting, with the CsPOR1 gene serving as a visual reporter instead of PDS [37]:

Construct Design: Target gene fragments (CsPOR1, CsTCS1) are cloned into TRV2 vectors and transformed into Agrobacterium. CsPOR1 silencing produces photobleaching due to disrupted chlorophyll biosynthesis [37].

Plant Material Preparation:

• For whole-plant VIGS, young tea seedlings are selected for infiltration [37].
• For tissue-specific silencing, inflorescence basal plates or detached tepals are used as transformation targets [37].

Agrobacterium Preparation: Bacterial cultures are resuspended to OD₆₀₀=1.0 in infiltration buffer containing 200µM acetosyringone, higher than concentrations used for other species [37] [38].

Vacuum Infiltration:

• Plant materials are submerged in Agrobacterium suspension [37].
• Vacuum is applied to evacuate air spaces, followed by rapid release to facilitate suspension infiltration [37].
• For floral tissue transformation, vacuum infiltration is applied to inflorescence basal plates or individual tepals [38].

Post-infiltration Care: Infiltrated plants are maintained under standard growth conditions (16-hour light/8-hour dark cycle, 25°C). Silencing phenotypes emerge within 12-25 days post-infiltration [37].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Vector	Function/Purpose	Application Notes
TRV Vectors (pTRV1/pTRV2)	Bipartite viral vector system for silencing	pTRV1 encodes replication/movement proteins; pTRV2 carries target gene insert [1]
Agrobacterium GV3101	Delivery vehicle for TRV constructs	Standard strain for plant transformation; requires specific antibiotics [4] [3]
Acetosyringone	Virulence inducer for Agrobacterium	Critical for T-DNA transfer; used at 200µM concentration [14]
PDS/POR Reporter Genes	Visual markers for silencing efficiency	PDS or POR silencing causes photobleaching; validates system functionality [37] [14] [39]
Infiltration Buffer	Carrier solution for Agrobacterium	Typically contains MES, MgCl₂, acetosyringone; pH optimized to 5.7 [14]
Restriction Enzymes	Molecular cloning of target fragments	EcoRI, XbaI, BamHI, XhoI commonly used for TRV2 insertion [4] [3]

Table 2: Essential reagents and their functions for implementing VIGS across plant species.

Workflow Diagram of VIGS Development and Application

The diagram below illustrates the core workflow for establishing and applying VIGS technology in plant species, highlighting critical optimization points and applications.

Critical Success Factors and Troubleshooting

Genotype Dependency: Sunflower exhibits significant genotype-dependent variation in VIGS efficiency, with infection rates ranging from 62-91% across different cultivars [4]. The genotype 'Smart SM-64B' showed highest infection percentage (91%) but lowest silencing phenotype spread, indicating that genotype selection requires balancing multiple efficiency parameters [4].

Environmental Optimization: Consistent environmental conditions post-infiltration are critical for VIGS success. Recommended parameters include 22-25°C temperature, 16-18 hour photoperiod, and 45% relative humidity [4] [37]. Temperature fluctuations significantly impact viral replication and systemic spread, while light intensity influences symptom development.

Viral Mobility Considerations: TRV presence is not always limited to tissues exhibiting silencing phenotypes, as demonstrated in sunflower where TRV was detected in leaves up to node 9 regardless of visible symptoms [4]. Time-lapse observations revealed more active silencing spread in young tissues compared to mature ones, informing optimal tissue selection for phenotypic analysis [4].

Troubleshooting Common Issues:

• Low infection efficiency: Optimize seed preparation (peeling), increase vacuum pressure/duration, verify Agrobacterium viability and density [4] [14].
• Patchy or inconsistent silencing: Ensure uniform infiltration, optimize co-cultivation duration, verify fragment specificity for target gene [4] [37].
• Plant stress or mortality: Reduce Agrobacterium density, shorten co-cultivation period, modify infiltration buffer composition [3] [39].

The comparative analysis of VIGS protocols for sunflower, soybean, and tea plants demonstrates that while TRV-based systems provide a versatile platform for functional genomics, successful implementation requires significant species-specific optimization. Critical variations exist in inoculation methods, with seed vacuum infiltration optimal for sunflower, cotyledon node immersion for soybean, and whole-plant vacuum infiltration for tea plants. Parameter optimization—including Agrobacterium density, co-cultivation duration, and genotype selection—proves essential for achieving high silencing efficiency.

These protocol variations highlight the importance of adapting methodology to plant morphology, transformation efficiency, and viral mobility in different species. The establishment of robust VIGS systems for these economically significant plants enables rapid functional characterization of genes involved in valuable traits, accelerating crop improvement programs and advancing plant functional genomics research.

Troubleshooting Seed Vacuum VIGS: Solving Common Problems and Enhancing Efficiency

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is a cornerstone of plant biotechnology, but its efficiency is often hampered by low infection rates, particularly in complex explants like seeds. The success of genetic transformation hinges on the intricate molecular battle between the infecting bacterium and the host plant's defense systems [40]. For researchers employing techniques such as seed vacuum VIGS infiltration, low transformation efficiency can be a significant bottleneck. This protocol details optimized methods for maintaining Agrobacterium viability and applying strategic seed pre-treatment to override plant defense mechanisms, thereby significantly enhancing infection rates. The principles outlined are derived from proven transformation systems across diverse species, including maize, kenaf, and passion fruit [41] [42] [43].

Core Principles: The Pathogen-Host Interaction

Understanding the molecular dialogue between Agrobacterium and plant cells is essential for diagnosing and overcoming low infection rates. The process is fundamentally a suppression of PAMP-Triggered Immunity (PTI). Agrobacterium senses phenolic compounds from wounded plant tissue, leading to the expression of bacterial virulence (vir) genes and the transfer of T-DNA and effector proteins into the host cell [40].

A key host factor is VIP1, which facilitates the nuclear import of the T-complex. The bacterium then manipulates the host's ubiquitin-proteasome system, using factors like its own VirF protein, to degrade VIP1 and other components, stripping the T-complex and enabling T-DNA integration [40]. Failure in this orchestration, often due to a potent and timely host defense response, results in transient expression or complete transformation failure. The pre-treatments and viability measures described below are designed to tilt this balance in favor of successful stable transformation.

Agrobacterium Viability and Preparation

The physiological state of the Agrobacterium culture is a primary determinant of its infectivity. Proper preparation ensures high viability and the expression of essential virulence genes.

Culture Conditions and Optimal Parameters

• Bacterial Strain Selection: The choice of strain is critical. For seed and hairy root transformation, K599 has demonstrated superior efficiency in multiple species [44] [42]. For embryonic callus transformation, disarmed strains like GV3010 are effective [41] [43].
• Culture Medium and Growth: Grow Agrobacterium in rich media such as YEP or LB with appropriate antibiotics to maintain the plasmid. The culture should be started from a fresh, single colony and grown at 28°C with vigorous shaking (200-250 rpm) to ensure good aeration [41] [42].
• Optical Density (OD600): The bacterial density at the time of infection is crucial. either too few or too many bacteria can reduce efficiency.

Table 1: Optimal Bacterial Density for Different Explant Types

Explant Type	Target OD600	Reported Efficiency	Source
Maize Embryonic Callus	1.0	~44% transient efficiency	[43]
Passion Fruit Hairy Roots	0.6	11.3% stable transformation	[42]
Kenaf Seeds	0.8 (culture)	6% stable transformation	[41]

• Induction with Acetosyringone (AS): AS is a phenolic compound that mimics plant wound signals and potently induces the bacterial vir genes. It should be added to the culture during the final stages of growth and be present in the co-cultivation medium. A concentration of 100-200 µM is commonly effective [42] [43].

Centrifugation and Re-suspension

After reaching the target OD600, pellet the bacterial cells by gentle centrifugation (e.g., 3000-5000 rpm for 10-15 minutes). Re-suspend the pellet in an induction or infiltration medium containing AS, and often macro/micronutrients, to maintain bacterial vitality during the infection process [16] [43]. The use of an infiltration solution containing additives like cysteine and Tween 20 has been shown to enhance whole-plant level transformation in monocots [16].

Seed Pre-treatment Strategies

Seeds present a formidable barrier to Agrobacterium infection due to their hard coat and dormant state. Pre-treatments are designed to soften these barriers and pre-emptively activate the plant's competence for transformation.

Physical and Mechanical Pre-treatments

• Seed Sterilization and Imbibition: Surface sterilize seeds with fungicides (e.g., Benlate) or ethanol/sodium hypochlorite solutions. Following sterilization, imbibe seeds in sterile distilled water for 12-24 hours to initiate germination and soften the seed coat [41].
• Seed Coat Removal and Wounding: For kenaf transformation, carefully removing the seed coat to keep the cotyledons and embryonic axis intact was a critical step [41]. Creating controlled wounds on the hypocotyl or other regions provides entry points for the bacterium, as demonstrated in sugar beet and passion fruit transformation [44] [42].

Biochemical and Enzymatic Pre-treatments

• Cell Wall Weakening: The plant cell wall is a major physical barrier. Pre-treating explants with a mixed lytic enzyme solution can significantly improve transformation efficiency and stability by partially digesting the cell wall, facilitating Agrobacterium access [43].
• Plant Hormone Adjustments: Agrobacterium naturally manipulates host hormone levels to facilitate transformation. Pre-treatment with hormones like auxins can "prime" the tissue, making it more receptive. The success of embryonic callus as an explant is partly due to its endogenous hormone balance and high competence [40] [43].

The following diagram summarizes the core workflow and the logical relationship between the key experimental steps for enhancing infection rates:

Integrated Experimental Protocol

This section provides a detailed, step-by-step protocol for the genetic transformation of kenaf seeds, which can be adapted for other species with appropriate modifications [41].

Table 2: Key Reagents and Solutions for Seed Transformation

Reagent/Solution	Function	Example Composition / Notes
Acetosyringone (AS)	Inducer of bacterial vir genes	100-200 µM in culture and co-cultivation media [42] [43]
Lytic Enzyme Mix	Weakens plant cell wall	Mixed enzymes in solution; concentration requires optimization [43]
Induction/Infiltration Medium	Maintains bacterial viability during infection	May contain MS salts, sugars, AS, and surfactants (e.g., Tween 20) [16]
Selection Antibiotics	Eliminates non-transformed tissue	e.g., Kanamycin for nptII selectable marker gene [41]

Step-by-Step Workflow:

• Seed Sterilization and Preparation:

  • Surface sterilize kenaf seeds using 1 g/L Benlate solution with Tween 20 for 30 minutes.
  • Rinse thoroughly 3 times with sterile distilled water.
  • Imbibe seeds in sterile water for 24 hours.
  • Carefully remove the seed coat to expose the embryonic axis and cotyledons.

• Agrobacterium Preparation:

  • Inoculate a single colony of A. tumefaciens strain GV3010 (harboring the binary vector with the gene of interest and a selectable marker like nptII) into liquid YEP medium with appropriate antibiotics.
  • Grow at 28°C with shaking (200 rpm) until the OD600 reaches 0.8.
  • Pellet the bacteria by centrifugation and re-suspend in an induction medium containing 100 µM acetosyringone to an OD600 of ~0.8.

• Infection and Co-cultivation:

  • Immerse the prepared kenaf seeds in the Agrobacterium suspension for 30 minutes with gentle agitation.
  • Blot the seeds dry on sterile filter paper and transfer them to co-cultivation medium (solidified with agar) containing acetosyringone.
  • Co-cultivate in the dark at 23°C for 2-3 days. This period is critical for T-DNA transfer.

• Selection and Regeneration:

  • After co-cultivation, transfer the seeds to a recovery medium without selection antibiotics for a few days.
  • Subsequently, transfer the plantlets to a selection medium containing antibiotics (e.g., kanamycin) to inhibit the growth of non-transformed plants.
  • Continue sub-culturing developing shoots onto fresh selection media until stable transgenic lines are established.

Anticipated Results and Data Analysis

When successfully implemented, this protocol can lead to a substantial increase in transformation efficiency. For example, in kenaf, this method yielded a 6% stable transformation efficiency, producing flowering plants in approximately 3 months [41]. In maize embryonic callus, optimizing parameters like bacterial density (OD600=1.0) led to transient transformation efficiencies of over 44% and stable transformation rates peaking as high as 94.46% in some experiments [43].

Molecular analysis, including PCR and Southern blotting, should confirm the stable integration of the transgene into the plant genome. Germination tests on selective media (e.g., kanamycin) in the T0 and T1 generations provide a reliable biological confirmation of stable transformation [41].

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Item	Function in Protocol	Specific Examples / Notes
Agrobacterium Strains	DNA delivery vehicle. Strain choice is critical for efficiency.	K599 for hairy roots [44] [42]; GV3010 for seed transformation [41]; Disarmed strains for stable transformation.
Binary Vector System	Carries gene of interest and selection marker between T-DNA borders.	pGreenII [41]; Vectors with visual markers (e.g., eGFP, RUBY) for easy screening [42].
Acetosyringone (AS)	Phenolic signal molecule that activates bacterial vir genes.	Essential for many recalcitrant species. Use in culture and co-cultivation media at 100-200 µM [42] [16].
Lytic Enzyme Solution	Weakens plant cell walls to facilitate bacterial entry.	A mixed solution; composition and concentration must be optimized for each species [43].
Visual Reporter Genes	Enables rapid, non-destructive screening of transgenic events.	eGFP (requires fluorescence microscope) [42]; RUBY (produces red betaxanthin, visible to naked eye) [42].
Selection Agents	Selects for growth of transformed cells and against non-transformed ones.	Antibiotics (e.g., Kanamycin), herbicides. Dose must be determined empirically.

Achieving high infection rates in Agrobacterium-mediated seed transformation is a multifaceted challenge that requires simultaneous optimization of both the biological vector and the plant explant. By ensuring high Agrobacterium viability through precise culture control and the use of virulence inducers like acetosyringone, and by applying strategic seed pre-treatments that overcome physical and immunological barriers, researchers can significantly enhance transformation efficiency. The protocols and data summarized here provide a robust framework for developing and optimizing transformation systems for a wide range of plant species, directly supporting advanced research in functional genomics and molecular breeding.

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful functional genomics tool for rapid gene function validation in plants. However, its application in non-model and recalcitrant species is often hampered by genotype-dependent efficiency, requiring extensive protocol optimization [4]. This challenge is particularly evident in important oilseed crops like sunflower and soybean, where traditional transformation methods face significant limitations. The seed vacuum infiltration protocol for VIGS represents a significant advancement, yet its effectiveness varies considerably across different genotypes within the same species. This application note examines the factors underlying genotype-dependent responses in sunflower and soybean VIGS experiments and provides optimized protocols to enhance silencing efficiency across diverse genetic backgrounds.

Comparative Analysis of Genotype-Dependent VIGS Efficiency

Quantitative Assessment of Silencing Efficiency Across Genotypes

Table 1: Genotype-Dependent VIGS Efficiency in Sunflower and Soybean

Species	Genotypes Tested	Infection Percentage Range	Silencing Efficiency	Key Influencing Factors	Protocol Adaptation
Sunflower	6 commercial cultivars and lines (including 'Smart SM-64B', 'Buzuluk', 'ZS')	62% - 91% [4]	Varying phenotypic spreading patterns [4]	Susceptibility to TRV infection, silencing symptom spread [4]	Seed vacuum technique + 6h co-cultivation [4]
Soybean	Tianlong 1 and others	65% - 95% [3]	Significant phenotypic changes observed [3]	Leaf cuticle thickness, trichome density [3]	Cotyledon node delivery with 20-30 min immersion [3]

Key Insights on Genotype-Specific Responses

The quantitative data reveal substantial variation in VIGS efficiency across different genotypes within both sunflower and soybean. In sunflower, the genotype 'Smart SM-64B' exhibited the highest infection percentage (91%), yet demonstrated the lowest spreading of the silencing phenotype compared to other genotypes [4]. This dissociation between infection efficiency and phenotypic manifestation highlights the complex interplay between viral movement and silencing mechanism efficacy across genetic backgrounds.

In soybean, conventional infiltration methods (misting and direct injection) showed limited effectiveness due to genotype-specific morphological traits such as thick cuticles and dense trichomes, which impede liquid penetration [3]. The optimized cotyledon node method achieved significantly higher efficiency (up to 95% in some genotypes like Tianlong 1) by bypassing these morphological barriers [3].

Optimized Experimental Protocols

Sunflower Seed Vacuum VIGS Protocol

Materials:

• Sunflower seeds (genotypes of interest)
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 harboring TRV vectors (pYL192/TRV1 and pYL156/TRV2 with target insert)
• Vacuum infiltration apparatus
• Co-cultivation medium

Methodology:

• Seed Preparation: Partially remove seed coats to enhance Agrobacterium access without damaging embryos [4].
• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Streak glycerol stocks on LB-agar plates with appropriate antibiotics (gentamicin, kanamycin, rifampicin)
  • Incubate at 28°C for 1.5 days
  • Prepare infiltration suspension (OD600 = 0.6) with acetosyringone (200 µM) [4]
• Vacuum Infiltration:
  • Submerge prepared seeds in Agrobacterium suspension
  • Apply vacuum (parameters optimized for sunflower)
  • Release vacuum gradually to ensure proper infiltration
• Co-cultivation: Transfer infiltrated seeds to co-cultivation medium for 6 hours [4]
• Plant Recovery: Sow directly in soil without in vitro recovery steps [4]

Critical Parameters: The 6-hour co-cultivation period was identified as crucial for maximizing infection efficiency in sunflower. Notably, this protocol eliminates the need for surface sterilization or in vitro recovery, significantly simplifying the process compared to previous methods [4].

Soybean Cotyledon Node VIGS Protocol

Materials:

• Surface-sterilized soybean seeds
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 with TRV vectors
• Half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium

Methodology:

• Seed Preparation:
  • Surface-sterilize soybean seeds
  • Soak in sterile water until swollen
  • Bisect longitudinally to obtain half-seed explants [3]
• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Culture in YM/LB medium (9:1 ratio) with antibiotics
  • Adjust to OD600 = 0.6 with acetosyringone (200 µM) [3]
• Infection Process:
  • Immerse fresh explants in Agrobacterium suspension for 20-30 minutes (optimal duration) [3]
• Recovery and Analysis:
  • Transfer to appropriate growth medium
  • Monitor GFP fluorescence at 4 days post-infection to verify infection efficiency [3]

Critical Parameters: The 20-30 minute immersion time was optimized for soybean cotyledon nodes. The effectiveness of infection can be validated through GFP fluorescence observation, with successful transformation showing fluorescence in 80% of cells in transverse sections [3].

Visualization of VIGS Workflows and Signaling Pathways

Comparative VIGS Workflow: Sunflower vs. Soybean

Diagram 1: Comparative VIGS workflow for sunflower and soybean. The visualization highlights key methodological differences between the two optimized protocols, particularly in explant preparation, infection method, and recovery phases.

Molecular Mechanism of VIGS and Genotype Influence

Diagram 2: Molecular mechanism of VIGS and genotype-dependent influencing factors. The core VIGS pathway (blue) demonstrates the universal silencing mechanism, while genotype-specific factors (yellow) highlight points where genetic variation can impact overall efficiency.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VIGS Optimization

Reagent/Vector	Specific Function	Application Notes	Optimal Usage Parameters
TRV Vectors (pYL192/TRV1 + pYL156/TRV2)	Bipartite viral system for silencing induction	Broad host range; efficient systemic movement [4] [3]	TRV1:Encodes replication proteins; TRV2:Contains target gene insert [1]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Delivery vehicle for TRV vectors	Superior for dicot transformation; compatible with vacuum infiltration [4] [3]	OD600=0.6; 200µM acetosyringone [4]
Phytoene Desaturase (PDS)	Visual marker for silencing efficiency	Photo-bleaching phenotype allows rapid assessment [4] [3]	Fragment size: 100-300bp; high siRNA prediction score [4]
Acetosyringone	Vir gene inducer in Agrobacterium	Enhances T-DNA transfer efficiency	200µM in final infiltration suspension [4]
RUBY Reporter System	Visual marker without need for instrumentation	Betalain pigment production; ideal for recalcitrant species [45]	Especially valuable for species with transformation challenges

The optimization of VIGS protocols for genotype-dependent responses in sunflower and soybean reveals both shared principles and species-specific adaptations. The dissociation between TRV presence and phenotypic silencing manifestations observed in sunflower [4], coupled with the morphological barriers identified in soybean [3], underscores the multifactorial nature of genotype effects. The protocols presented herein provide robust frameworks for functional genomics in these important oilseed crops, with the sunflower seed vacuum method achieving up to 91% infection efficiency and the soybean cotyledon node approach reaching 95% efficiency in optimal genotypes.

Future directions should focus on expanding genotype compatibility through systematic testing of viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) [1], refining vacuum parameters for diverse seed types, and developing standardized phenotypic scoring systems for more quantitative efficiency assessments across genetic backgrounds. The integration of these optimized VIGS protocols with multi-omics approaches will significantly accelerate gene function validation and trait development in sunflower, soybean, and other recalcitrant crop species.

Within the research framework of developing a robust seed vacuum Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) infiltration protocol, precise management of environmental factors is a critical determinant of success. VIGS is a powerful reverse-genetics tool for studying gene function, but its efficacy is highly dependent on the physiological state of the host plant and the replication efficiency of the viral vector [1]. Post-infiltration environmental conditions, particularly temperature, humidity, and photoperiod, directly influence both plant physiology and viral activity, thereby significantly impacting the efficiency and consistency of systemic gene silencing. This Application Note provides detailed protocols and data-driven guidelines for optimizing these environmental factors to ensure high silencing efficiency in seed vacuum VIGS experiments.

Quantitative Effects of Environmental Factors on VIGS Efficiency

Environmental conditions after agroinfiltration significantly influence the efficiency of VIGS by affecting both the plant's physiological response and the virus's ability to spread and induce silencing. The table below summarizes the optimal ranges and effects of key environmental factors, synthesized from recent studies.

Table 1: Optimal Environmental Conditions for Enhancing VIGS Efficiency

Environmental Factor	Optimal Range for VIGS	Observed Effect on Silencing	Supporting Evidence
Temperature	15 °C – 22 °C	Lower temperatures (e.g., 15°C) enhance silencing stability and spread. Higher temperatures can reduce efficiency.	Silencing of PDS and LeEIN2 in tomato was significantly enhanced at 15°C [46]. Greenhouse protocols often maintain ~22°C [4].
Relative Humidity	30% – 45%	Low humidity (e.g., 30%) enhances silencing. High humidity can be detrimental to the process.	A study on tomato showed that 30% relative humidity enhanced VIGS [46]. An optimized sunflower protocol uses 45% humidity [4].
Photoperiod	Long-day conditions (e.g., 16h light / 8h dark)	Longer photoperiods support robust plant growth and metabolic activity, facilitating systemic silencing.	Protocols for sunflower (18h light) and Areca catechu (16h light) utilize long-day photoperiods for successful VIGS [4] [47].
Light Intensity	400 µmol/(m²s)	Provides sufficient energy for plant development without causing light stress, supporting effective silencing.	This light intensity was used in the successful establishment of VIGS in Areca catechu embryoids [47].

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Environmental Optimization

Protocol: Establishing a Low-Temperature, Low-Humidity Regime for Enhanced Silencing

This protocol is adapted from a study that demonstrated enhanced VIGS in tomato under controlled environmental stress [46].

Application Scope: This protocol is suitable for VIGS experiments in Solanaceous species like tomato and pepper and may be applicable to other dicot species where standard conditions yield suboptimal silencing.

Materials:

• Plant growth chambers with precise temperature, humidity, and light control.
• TRV-based VIGS constructs (e.g., TRV1 and TRV2-PDS) in Agrobacterium.
• Target plant species (e.g., tomato, pepper) at the appropriate developmental stage (typically 2-4 leaf stage for vacuum infiltration of seeds or seedlings).
• Humidity-controlling solutions (e.g., saturated salt solutions) if chambers are not available.

Procedure:

• Plant Infiltration & Acclimation: Perform the seed vacuum infiltration or agroinfiltration following your established laboratory protocol [4].
• Initial Incubation: Place the infiltrated plants in a growth chamber set at a standard temperature (e.g., 22-25°C) and humidity (50-60%) for 48 hours to allow initial recovery and Agrobacterium-mediated transfer of the T-DNA.
• Environmental Treatment Transfer: After 48 hours, move one group of plants to the optimized environmental regime:
  • Temperature: 15°C
  • Relative Humidity: 30%
  • Photoperiod: 16 hours light / 8 hours dark
  • Light Intensity: 200-400 µmol/(m²s)
• Control Group Maintenance: Maintain a control group of infiltrated plants under standard growth conditions (e.g., 22-25°C, 50-60% RH).
• Monitoring & Data Collection: Observe plants daily for the development of silencing phenotypes (e.g., photobleaching for PDS).
  • Phenotypic Documentation: Photograph silencing symptoms at regular intervals (e.g., 7, 14, 21 days post-infiltration).
  • Molecular Validation: At the peak of phenotype expression, collect leaf tissue from both control and treated plants for RNA extraction. Perform RT-qPCR to quantify the mRNA levels of the target gene (e.g., PDS) to confirm the enhancement of silencing under low-temperature/low-humidity conditions [46].

Protocol: Humidity Control Using Saturated Salt Solutions

For laboratories without controlled environment chambers, stable humidity levels can be maintained using saturated salt solutions in airtight containers [48].

Procedure:

• Solution Preparation: Prepare saturated aqueous solutions of magnesium chloride (MgCl₂) to maintain 30-32% RH or aluminum nitrate (Al(NO₃)₃) to maintain 60% RH in airtight containers [48].
• Placement: Pour the solution into a tray placed at the bottom of a transparent airtight container.
• Equilibration: Allow the container to equilibrate for several hours before introducing plants.
• Plant Storage: Place pots with infiltrated plants inside the container. Ensure the container is sealed and placed in a growth chamber with the appropriate temperature and light settings.
• Monitoring: Use a digital hygrometer to verify that the relative humidity inside the container remains stable.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

The following table lists essential materials and reagents required for implementing and optimizing the seed vacuum VIGS protocol under controlled environmental conditions.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Seed Vacuum VIGS

Item	Function / Purpose	Example / Specification
TRV Vectors	Bipartite viral vector system for inducing silencing.	Plasmids pTRV1 (encoding replication/movement proteins) and pTRV2 (with MCS for target gene insert) [4] [1].
Agrobacterium Strain	Delivery vehicle for TRV vectors into plant cells.	GV3101 or EHA105 [4] [3] [47].
Antibiotics	Selection for recombinant Agrobacterium strains.	Kanamycin, Rifampicin, Gentamicin [4].
Induction Agent	Activates Agrobacterium virulence genes for efficient T-DNA transfer.	Acetosyringone [47].
Reporter Gene	Visual marker to rapidly assess VIGS efficiency.	Phytoene desaturase (PDS), which causes photobleaching when silenced [4] [3] [47].
Controlled Environment Chambers	Precisely regulate temperature, humidity, and light post-infiltration.	Capable of maintaining 15-22°C, 30-45% RH, and programmable photoperiod [46] [4].

Workflow and Signaling Pathways

The following diagram illustrates the experimental workflow for optimizing environmental factors in a seed vacuum VIGS experiment, highlighting the critical decision points and procedures.

Experimental Workflow for VIGS Optimization

The molecular mechanism of VIGS leverages the plant's innate RNA-based antiviral defense system. The diagram below outlines the key signaling and pathway interactions from vector delivery to observable phenotypic change.

Molecular Pathway of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) is a powerful reverse genetics tool that enables rapid functional analysis of plant genes by leveraging the plant's own RNA interference machinery to silence targeted endogenous genes. The efficacy of VIGS critically depends on the efficient systemic spread of the viral vector throughout the plant, enabling comprehensive silencing beyond the initial infection site. Within the broader context of seed vacuum VIGS infiltration protocol research, achieving consistent and widespread silencing remains a significant challenge, particularly in recalcitrant species. This Application Note synthesizes current research to provide detailed protocols and mechanistic insights aimed at enhancing viral mobility for improved systemic silencing spread, providing researchers with practical methodologies to optimize VIGS efficiency across diverse plant systems.

Key Optimization Parameters for Systemic VIGS Spread

Extensive research has identified several critical factors that significantly influence the systemic spread and efficiency of VIGS. The table below summarizes key quantitative findings from recent studies:

Table 1: Key Parameters Affecting Systemic VIGS Spread and Efficiency

Optimization Factor	Experimental Findings	Impact on Silencing	Reference
Infiltration Technique	Seed vacuum infiltration + 6h co-cultivation in sunflower	Up to 77% infection rate; extensive spread to upper nodes [4]
Plant Genotype	Screening of 6 sunflower genotypes	Infection rates varied from 62% to 91%; differential phenotype spreading [4]
Tissue Developmental Stage	Young vs. mature tissues in sunflower	More active silencing spread in young, developing tissues [4]
Agroinfiltration Method	Cotyledon node immersion in soybean	65-95% silencing efficiency; effective systemic spread [3]
Capsule Developmental Stage	Early vs. mid-stage capsules in Camellia drupifera	~70-91% silencing efficiency depending on stage [6]
Vacuum Parameters	0.8 kPa for 5 min in tea plants	Highest silencing efficiency of 63.34% [49]

Detailed Experimental Protocol: Seed Vacuum VIGS for Enhanced Systemic Spread

The following protocol, optimized for sunflower but adaptable to other species, is designed to maximize initial infection and subsequent systemic spread of the VIGS construct [4].

Materials and Reagents

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Reagent/Vector	Function/Purpose	Key Specifications
TRV Vectors (pYL192 & pYL156)	Binary VIGS vector system	pYL192 (TRV1 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase), pYL156 (TRV2 for insert cloning) [4] [8]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Delivery vehicle for TRV vectors	Virulent strain for plant transformation; contains necessary plasmids for virulence [4] [3]
Acetosyringone	Phenolic inducer of Agrobacterium vir genes	Critical for activating bacterial virulence machinery; typically used at 200 µM [4] [8]
Appropriate Antibiotics	Selection for recombinant plasmids	e.g., Kanamycin (50 µg/mL), Gentamicin (25 µg/mL), Rifampicin (50 µg/mL) [4] [8]
Induction Buffer	Bacterial resuspension medium	10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl₂, 200 µM Acetosyringone; optimizes bacterial readiness for plant infection [8]

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Vector Construction and Agrobacterium Preparation

  • Clone a 100-300 bp fragment of the target gene (e.g., PDS for visual tracking) into the multiple cloning site of the TRV2 vector (e.g., pYL156) using appropriate restriction enzymes (e.g., XbaI and BamHI) [4].
  • Transform recombinant TRV2 and helper TRV1 plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 via electroporation.
  • Streak transformed Agrobacterium from glycerol stocks onto LB-agar plates with relevant antibiotics (Kanamycin, Gentamicin, Rifampicin) and incubate at 28°C for 48 hours [4].
  • Inoculate single colonies into liquid LB medium with antibiotics and 10 mM MES/20 µM acetosyringone. Grow cultures overnight at 28°C with shaking until OD600 reaches 0.8-1.2 [4] [8].
  • Harvest bacterial cells by centrifugation and resuspend in induction buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl₂, 200 µM acetosyringone) to a final OD600 of 1.5. Incubate this suspension at room temperature for 3-4 hours [8].

• Seed Preparation and Vacuum Infiltration

  • Partially peel the seed coats to improve permeability, taking care not to damage the embryo. No surface sterilization or in vitro recovery is necessary [4].
  • Place the prepared seeds in a container with the Agrobacterium suspension (mixed 1:1, TRV1:TRV2).
  • Apply a vacuum of 0.8-1.0 kPa for approximately 5 minutes [4] [49]. The optimal pressure and duration may require species-specific adjustment.
  • Gradually release the vacuum to allow the suspension to fully penetrate the seed tissues.

• Co-cultivation and Plant Growth

  • Following infiltration, subject the seeds to a 6-hour co-cultivation period in the Agrobacterium suspension [4].
  • Sow the treated seeds directly into a suitable soil mixture (e.g., 3:1 peat:perlite). No in vitro recovery step is needed.
  • Maintain plants under controlled environmental conditions: approximately 22°C, 18-hour light/6-hour dark photoperiod, and 45% relative humidity. Keep pots close together without gaps to potentially facilitate viral spread [4].

Mechanistic Workflow of VIGS and Systemic Spread

The following diagram illustrates the key steps of the VIGS process, from vector delivery to systemic silencing, highlighting points that can be enhanced for improved mobility.

Diagram 1: VIGS Workflow and Systemic Spread. Critical optimization points like Seed Vacuum Infiltration and the resulting Systemic Spread are highlighted.

Critical Considerations for Enhancing Viral Mobility

• Genotype Selection: Acknowledge and address genotype-dependent responses. Preliminary screening for susceptibility is crucial. For instance, in sunflowers, genotype 'Smart SM-64B' showed 91% infection rates, though phenotype spread varied [4].

• Tissue Age Targeting: The silencing phenotype spreads more actively in young, developing tissues compared to mature ones [4]. Ensure that the viral vector reaches the meristematic regions and that plants are at an optimal developmental stage during infiltration.

• Viral Presence vs. Silencing Phenotype: Recognize that the presence of the TRV virus, detectable via RT-PCR, is not always limited to tissues showing a visible silencing phenotype [4]. Monitoring should include molecular confirmation beyond visual inspection.

• Environmental Optimization: Maintain consistent post-infection conditions. Factors such as temperature (∼22°C), humidity (~45%), and photoperiod (18h light:6h dark) significantly impact viral replication and movement [4].

Enhancing the systemic spread of VIGS is achievable through a multifaceted approach that optimizes the initial infiltration protocol, selects responsive plant materials, and controls post-infection environmental conditions. The seed vacuum infiltration method, characterized by its simplicity and efficacy, provides a robust foundation for achieving high infection rates and extensive viral mobility. By implementing the detailed protocols and considerations outlined in this Application Note, researchers can significantly improve the reliability and reach of VIGS, thereby accelerating functional genomics studies in a wide range of plant species, including previously recalcitrant crops.

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) is a powerful reverse genetics tool that enables rapid functional analysis of plant genes by exploiting the plant's natural RNA-mediated defense mechanisms. The seed vacuum infiltration protocol represents a significant advancement for applying VIGS to challenging species, particularly sunflower, by combining high efficiency with remarkable simplicity. This method achieves infection percentages of 62–91% across different genotypes without requiring surface sterilization or in vitro recovery steps [4]. However, researchers often encounter two fundamental challenges: complete absence of silencing or confounding non-specific symptoms that obscure phenotypic interpretation. This guide provides systematic troubleshooting methodologies to identify and resolve these issues, framed within the context of seed vacuum VIGS infiltration protocol research.

VIGS Mechanism and Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the fundamental mechanism of VIGS and the sequential steps of the seed vacuum infiltration protocol, highlighting key checkpoints for troubleshooting.

Troubleshooting No Silencing

Complete absence of silencing symptoms indicates a fundamental failure in the VIGS process. The following table provides a systematic approach to diagnose and resolve this issue.

Problem Area	Specific Issue	Diagnostic Method	Solution
Vector Integrity	Incorrect insert cloning or vector degradation	Restriction digest, PCR verification, sequencing	Reclone insert; use fresh glycerol stocks; verify siRNA target region (e.g., 193bp for HaPDS with 11 predicted siRNAs) [4]
Agrobacterium Strain	Low transformation efficiency or plasmid loss	PCR of bacterial culture, antibiotic resistance testing	Use fresh GV3101 transformations; verify antibiotic selection (kanamycin 50μg/mL, gentamicin 10μg/mL, rifampicin 100μg/mL) [4]
Infiltration Parameters	Suboptimal bacterial concentration	Spectrophotometer measurement	Adjust OD₆₀₀ to 1.0-1.5; confirm with viable cell count [4]
	Incomplete vacuum infiltration	Visual inspection of air bubble release	Apply 5-10 minute vacuum until bubbling ceases; ensure seeds are fully submerged [4] [3]
	Insufficient co-cultivation	Time monitoring	Extend co-cultivation to 6 hours; maintain temperature at 22°C [4]
Plant Material	Genotype-dependent resistance	Multiple genotype screening	Test susceptible genotypes (e.g., 'Smart SM-64B' shows 91% infection); consider cultivar-specific optimization [4]
	Seed coat interference	Microscopic examination	Peel seed coats completely; use younger seeds with permeable coats [4]
Environmental Conditions	Non-optimal growth conditions	Environmental monitoring	Maintain 22°C, 45% humidity, 18-h light/6-h dark photoperiod; ensure no gaps between pots [4]

Addressing Non-Specific Symptoms

Non-specific symptoms can obscure true silencing phenotypes and lead to misinterpretation. The table below distinguishes between viral infection symptoms, environmental stress, and true silencing phenotypes.

Symptom Type	Characteristics	Distinguishing Features	Resolution Approach
Viral Infection Symptoms	Leaf curling, mosaic patterns, severe stunting	Systemic, not target-gene specific, appear before silencing window	Purify Agrobacterium stock; use lower OD₆₀₀ (0.8-1.0); include empty vector controls [50]
Hypersensitive Response	Localized necrosis, chlorotic spots	Rapid onset (2-4 dpi), localized to infiltration sites	Reduce bacterial concentration; optimize surfactant concentration; use younger plants [3]
Environmental Stress	Uniform chlorosis, wilting, general growth retardation	Affects entire plant uniformly, not gene-specific	Standardize growth conditions (22°C, 45% RH, 18h light); ensure consistent watering; eliminate pot gaps [4]
Off-Target Silencing	Pleiotropic phenotypes unrelated to target gene	Inconsistent across biological replicates; bioinformatic prediction	Redesign target fragment using pssRNAit (avoid sequences with >4 siRNA predictions in non-target genes); test multiple target regions [4]
True Silencing Phenotype	Specific photobleaching (PDS), developmental defects	Reproducible, gene-specific, correlates with molecular confirmation	Confirm via qRT-PCR (normalized relative expression ~0.01); multiple independent biological replicates [4]

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details key reagents and materials critical for successful implementation of the seed vacuum VIGS protocol.

Reagent/Material	Function	Protocol Specification
TRV Vectors (pYL192-TRV1, pYL156-TRV2)	Viral backbone for silencing construct	pYL192 (TRV1, Addgene #148968), pYL156 (TRV2, Addgene #148969); includes PDS insert as positive control [4]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Vector delivery system	Standard electroporation transformation; glycerol stocks at -80°C [4] [3]
Antibiotics (Kanamycin, Gentamicin, Rifampicin)	Selection of transformed Agrobacterium	LB-agar plates with 50μg/mL kanamycin, 10μg/mL gentamicin, 100μg/mL rifampicin [4]
Infiltration Buffer (MgCl₂, MES, Acetosyringone)	Induction of virulence genes	10mM MgCl₂, 10mM MES, 150μM acetosyringone; adjust to pH 5.6 [3]
Growth Medium (Peat:Perlite)	Plant support and nutrition	3:1 ratio of peat to perlite; maintain consistent batch quality [4]
Restriction Enzymes (XbaI, BamHI)	Vector construction	FastDigest enzymes; 2h incubation at 37°C followed by 5min at 80°C for heat inactivation [4]

Quantitative Data Reference Table

The following table summarizes key quantitative parameters from established VIGS protocols to guide experimental optimization.

Parameter	Optimal Range	Effect on Efficiency	Protocol Reference
Bacterial OD₆₀₀	1.0-1.5	Higher than leaf infiltration (typically 0.3-0.6); critical for seed penetration [4] [3]	Sunflower seed vacuum protocol [4]
Vacuum Duration	5-10 minutes	Until bubbling ceases; insufficient = no delivery; excessive = tissue damage [4]	Sunflower seed vacuum protocol [4]
Co-cultivation Time	6 hours	Shorter periods reduce T-DNA transfer; longer increases overgrowth risk [4]	Sunflower optimization [4]
Silencing Onset	10-21 dpi	Varies by species: tobacco (10d), soybean (21d), tomato (8 weeks) [4] [50] [3]	Multi-species comparison [4] [50] [3]
Infection Percentage	62-91%	Genotype-dependent: 'Smart SM-64B' (91%), 'ZS' (77%), other cultivars (62-84%) [4]	Sunflower genotype screen [4]
Gene Expression Reduction	1% residual expression	Normalized relative expression = 0.01; confirmed by qRT-PCR [4]	Sunflower PDS silencing [4]
Target Fragment Size	100-300 bp	Optimal for siRNA generation; 193bp HaPDS fragment with 11 predicted siRNAs [4]	Sunflower PDS design [4]

Advanced Technical Considerations

Genotype-Specific Optimization

The efficiency of VIGS spreading and symptom manifestation varies significantly across genotypes. Research shows that while 'Smart SM-64B' exhibited the highest infection percentage (91%), it demonstrated the lowest silencing phenotype spread compared to other sunflower genotypes [4]. This highlights the critical need for genotype-specific protocol optimization. When adapting the seed vacuum VIGS protocol to new genotypes, conduct preliminary experiments with PDS as a reporter to establish baseline efficiency.

Viral Mobility and Tissue Specificity

Understanding TRV mobility patterns is essential for interpreting silencing phenotypes. Studies demonstrate that TRV presence is not necessarily limited to tissues with observable silencing events [4]. RT-PCR analysis revealed TRV presence in leaves at the highest node (up to node 9) in sunflowers infected via seed vacuum protocol, indicating extensive viral spreading throughout the plant [4]. This has important implications for phenotyping, as target gene expression should be assessed in specific tissues rather than whole seedlings.

Temporal Dynamics of Silencing

Time-lapse observations demonstrate more active spreading of photo-bleached spots in young tissues compared to mature ones [4]. This developmental stage dependency should guide phenotypic assessment timelines. For sunflowers, optimal silencing observation occurs between 21-28 days post-infiltration, while for soybeans, the TRV-VIGS system shows phenotypes at 21 dpi with efficiency ranging from 65% to 95% [3]. Monitoring silencing progression over time provides more reliable data than single-timepoint observations.

Validating and Comparing VIGS Results: Ensuring Experimental Reliability

This application note details the use of the phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene as a visual marker for validating Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) efficiency. Framed within broader research on seed vacuum infiltration protocols, this document provides standardized methodologies and quantitative data to support phenotypic validation in plant functional genomics.

The phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene encodes a key enzyme in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. Its silencing disrupts chlorophyll synthesis and photoprotection, leading to a characteristic photo-bleached phenotype of white or yellow tissues [49] [24]. This non-lethal, visually discernible effect makes it an ideal positive control marker for optimizing and validating VIGS protocols across diverse plant species [51] [1].

The underlying mechanism involves post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS). When a recombinant viral vector carrying a fragment of the PDS gene is introduced into the plant, the plant's RNA interference machinery processes the viral double-stranded RNA into siRNAs. These siRNAs guide the sequence-specific degradation of endogenous PDS mRNA, leading to a depletion of carotenoids and subsequent photo-bleaching [24]. The logical flow from PDS silencing to the visible phenotype is outlined in the diagram below.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

The following table catalogues the essential reagents and materials required for establishing PDS-VIGS as a visual marker system.

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Example Application
pTRV1 & pTRV2 Vectors	Binary T-DNA vectors carrying bipartite Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV) genome [24] [1].	Systemic viral spread; pTRV2 contains MCS for inserting PDS fragment [51].
pTRV2-PDS Construct	Recombinant VIGS vector with a ~200-500 bp PDS gene fragment from target species [51] [49].	Triggers sequence-specific silencing of endogenous PDS gene.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	Bacterial strain (e.g., GV3101) for plant transformation and vector delivery [51] [5].	Delivers T-DNA containing viral vectors into plant cells.
Inoculation Buffer	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES (pH 5.6), 200 µM Acetosyringone [51].	Suspension medium for agrobacteria; induces virulence.
Antibiotics	Kanamycin, Rifampicin [51].	Selective maintenance of binary vectors in agrobacteria.

Quantitative Phenotypic Data from Model Species

The utility of PDS as a visual marker has been quantitatively demonstrated across a wide range of species. The table below summarizes key phenotypic outcomes and silencing efficiencies from recent studies.

Plant Species	Silencing Efficiency/Phenotype	Key Quantitative Findings	Citation
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)	100% silencing frequency; pale-yellow fruit [51].	Downregulation of carotenoid genes ZDS, CrtR-b2; altered ethylene response genes E4, E8. [51]	[51]
Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis 'QC1')	Up to 63.3% silencing efficiency; leaf yellowing [49].	Optimized vacuum infiltration (0.8 kPa, 5 min); increased theanine content in silenced leaves. [49]	[49]
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana)	~100% photobleaching in young seedlings [52].	Optimal in 2-3 leaf stage seedlings grown under 16-h photoperiod; OD600=1.5 agroinfiltration. [52]	[52]
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)	Effective in germinating seeds & roots via Si-VIGS [5].	Superior belowground silencing vs. leaf injection; enabled functional genomics at early development stages. [5]	[5]
Lily (Lilium × formolongi)	92% plant survival; systemic photobleaching [53].	Significant correlation between phenotype and downregulation of endogenous LhPDS mRNA (P ≤ 0.05). [53]	[53]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol A: Seed Imbibition-Mediated VIGS (Si-VIGS) for Early Germination Stages

This protocol is adapted for functional genomics studies during seed germination, a critical advancement for species with long life cycles [5].

• Step 1: Vector Preparation

  • Transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain (e.g., GV3101) with pTRV1 and pTRV2-PDS vectors separately [51] [5].
  • Culture single colonies in LB broth with appropriate antibiotics (e.g., 25 mg L⁻¹ kanamycin, rifampicin) at 28°C, 300 rpm until OD600 ≈ 0.6 [51].
  • Pellet bacterial cells by centrifugation and resuspend in inoculation buffer (10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 200 µM acetosyringone, pH 5.6) to a final OD600 of 1.0-1.5 [51] [52]. Incubate the suspension for 4-6 hours with shaking.

• Step 2: Seed Imbibition Inoculation

  • Mix the pTRV1 and pTRV2-PDS bacterial suspensions in a 1:1 ratio.
  • For Si-VIGS, immerse dry or pre-wetted seeds directly in the agrobacterium mixture. Apply a brief vacuum infiltration (e.g., 0.8 kPa for 5 minutes) to enhance delivery, then continue imbibition for 4-12 hours [5].
  • Sow the treated seeds directly into sterile soil or planting medium.

• Step 3: Post-Inoculation Plant Management & Phenotyping

  • Grow plants under controlled environmental conditions. For Arabidopsis and many crops, a long-day photoperiod (16-h light) is recommended for higher silencing efficiency [52].
  • The first signs of PDS silencing (photo-bleaching) in newly emerged tissues typically appear 2-4 weeks post-inoculation [49] [5] [24].
  • Document the phenotype photographically and calculate the silencing efficiency using the formula: Silencing Frequency (%) = (Number of plants with visible silencing / Total number of inoculated plants) × 100 [51].

The experimental workflow for this protocol is summarized in the diagram below.

Protocol B: Agroinjection of Detached Fruits

This protocol is optimized for studying gene function in fleshy fruits, such as tomato [51].

• Step 1: Agroinfiltration of Detached Fruit

  • Prepare the Agrobacterium suspension containing pTRV1 and pTRV2-PDS as described in Protocol A, Step 1.
  • Harvest fruits at the desired developmental stage (e.g., mature green for tomatoes).
  • Using a 1-mL syringe, inject the agrobacterium suspension through the carpopodium (fruit stalk) into the detached fruit. Infiltration is successful when the suspension becomes visible in the sepals [51].

• Step 2: Incubation and Monitoring

  • Place the injected fruits in a growth chamber with high humidity (e.g., 70% RH) at 23°C.
  • The pale-yellow silenced phenotype typically develops throughout the fruit surface within two weeks of injection [51].

Critical Considerations and Troubleshooting

• Beyond a Marker: Pleiotropic Effects: PDS silencing can have unintended consequences. In tomato, it acts as a positive regulator of ripening, significantly altering the expression of key ripening genes (RIN, TAGL1, ACO1/3) and ethylene pathways [51]. Interpret silencing data cautiously, as phenotypes may not be solely due to the target gene.
• Optimization is Key: Silencing efficiency is highly dependent on plant age, genotype, and environment. Using younger seedlings (e.g., 2-3 leaf stage) and long-day photoperiods can dramatically improve results [52] [49].
• Molecular Confirmation: Always corroborate the visual phenotype with molecular analysis (e.g., qRT-PCR) to confirm the downregulation of the endogenous PDS gene and, if applicable, your target gene of interest [51] [49].

Within the broader research on seed vacuum Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) infiltration protocols, the confirmation of target gene knockdown is a critical step. This application note details the use of Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) for assessing gene silencing efficiency following VIGS, providing a standardized methodology applicable to various plant species, including Atriplex canescens [14] and sunflower [4]. Accurate quantification of mRNA levels is essential for validating the functional impact of VIGS before proceeding to phenotypic analyses.

Key Principles of RT-qPCR in VIGS Validation

The fundamental principle involves quantifying the relative abundance of target mRNA transcripts in VIGS-treated plants compared to control plants. Successful mRNA cleavage triggered by the RNAi machinery should result in a statistically significant reduction in transcript levels in plants infiltrated with TRV2 vectors containing target gene fragments versus those infiltrated with empty TRV2 vectors [14].

A critical consideration is the potential for overestimating functional mRNA due to the detection of mRNA cleavage fragments by RT-qPCR. After RNAi-mediated cleavage, the resulting 5' and 3' mRNA fragments are degraded by cellular machinery, but undegraded fragments can remain [54]. The 3' fragment, in particular, may still contain the poly-A tail and be reverse-transcribed, leading to its amplification and thus an underestimation of true knockdown efficiency. This issue can be mitigated through strategic primer design and template preparation [54].

Experimental Workflow & Protocol

The following section outlines the complete protocol from sample collection to data analysis.

Sample Collection and RNA Isolation

• Tissue Harvesting: Collect systemic leaves exhibiting silencing phenotypes (e.g., photobleaching for PDS). For sunflower and Atriplex canescens, this typically occurs around 15-20 days post-inoculation [14] [4]. Flash-freeze tissue in liquid nitrogen and store at -80°C.
• RNA Isolation: Use a commercial kit (e.g., RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit) for total RNA isolation, including an on-column DNase digestion step to remove genomic DNA contamination [54].
• RNA Quality Control: Assess RNA integrity and purity using spectrophotometry (A260/A280 ratio ~2.0) and gel electrophoresis.

cDNA Synthesis

Two template preparation paths are recommended:

• Path A (Total RNA): Synthesize cDNA from 1 µg of total RNA using a reverse transcription kit (e.g., SensiFast cDNA Synthesis Kit) with oligo(dT) and/or random hexamer primers [54].
• Path B (Poly-A mRNA): For enhanced accuracy, first purify polyadenylated mRNA from total RNA (e.g., using Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit), then synthesize cDNA. This method excludes the 5' mRNA cleavage fragment from detection, providing a more accurate measure of functional, uncleaved mRNA [54].

Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

• Reaction Setup: Use a SYBR Green-based master mix (e.g., SensiFAST SYBR No-Rox Kit). A standard 10-20 µL reaction contains 1x master mix, gene-specific primers (0.5 µM each), and a cDNA template equivalent to 10-20 ng of original RNA.
• Thermal Cycling: A typical protocol includes an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60-65°C for 30 seconds, concluding with a melt curve analysis to verify amplicon specificity [54].
• Experimental Design: Include technical triplicates for each biological replicate and incorporate negative controls (no-template control).

The following workflow diagram summarizes the entire RT-qPCR process.

RT-qPCR Workflow for VIGS Validation

Primer Design Strategy

Optimal primer design is paramount for accurately quantifying knockdown efficiency. The guiding principle is to design amplicons 5' upstream of the predicted siRNA cut site on the target mRNA [54]. This ensures the amplification of only full-length, functional transcripts and avoids detection of the persistent 3' cleavage fragment, which would lead to underestimation of knockdown.

• Target Region: Clone a 300-400 bp gene-specific fragment from the target gene's open reading frame into the TRV2 vector [14]. Use online tools like pssRNAit or SGN-VIGS to identify optimal silencing fragments and potential siRNA target sites [14] [4].
• Amplicon Location: Design qPCR primers to amplify a 70-200 bp product located 5' to the VIGS fragment insertion site or the primary siRNA cut site.
• Sequence Analysis: Verify primer specificity using BLAST against the host genome to prevent off-target amplification.
• Validation: Test primer efficiency (ideally 90-110%) using a standard curve from a serial dilution of cDNA.

The diagram below illustrates the recommended primer design strategy relative to the VIGS target site.

Primer Design Strategy for VIGS

Data Analysis

Calculation of Knockdown Efficiency

• Normalization: Normalize the Ct values of the target gene to the geometric mean of Ct values from at least two validated reference genes (e.g., eIF2Bγ and βCOP in Drosophila studies; UBQ or EF1α in plants) [54].
• ΔΔCt Method: Use the ΔΔCt method, correcting for primer efficiencies, to calculate the relative gene expression (RQ) in VIGS-treated samples compared to empty vector (TRV2:0) controls [54].
• Efficiency Formula: Calculate the percentage knockdown efficiency using the formula: Knockdown Efficiency (%) = (1 - RQ) × 100 where RQ is the relative quantification of the target gene in the silenced sample versus the control.

Troubleshooting Common Issues

• High Variation: Ensure consistent tissue sampling and RNA quality across biological replicates.
• Low Knockdown: Verify VIGS efficiency through positive control genes (e.g., PDS) and optimize infiltration parameters (e.g., vacuum pressure, Agrobacterium OD600) [14].
• No Amplification/Melt Curve Issues: Re-design primers and check cDNA synthesis.

Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details essential materials and reagents for conducting RT-qPCR validation of VIGS.

Reagent/Kit	Function/Benefit	Example Product
Total RNA Isolation Kit	Extracts high-quality, DNA-free total RNA for initial template preparation.	RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen) [54]
mRNA Purification Kit	Isolates polyadenylated mRNA, enhancing accuracy by excluding 5' cleavage fragments.	Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) [54]
cDNA Synthesis Kit	Reverse transcribes RNA into stable cDNA for qPCR amplification.	SensiFast cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline) [54]
SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix	Provides all components for sensitive and specific qPCR detection.	SensiFAST SYBR No-Rox Kit (Bioline) [54]
VIGS Vectors (TRV1/TRV2)	Engineered viral vectors for delivering target gene fragments to induce silencing.	pYL192 (TRV1), pYL156 (TRV2) [4]
Agrobacterium Strain	Used to deliver the TRV VIGS vectors into plant tissues via infiltration.	A. tumefaciens GV3101 [14] [4]

The table below consolidates key quantitative findings from recent VIGS studies, demonstrating the application of this RT-qPCR validation framework.

Plant Species	Target Gene(s)	Silencing Efficiency	Key Methodological Notes	Citation
Atriplex canescens	AcPDS	40-80% reduction in transcript level	Seed vacuum infiltration (0.5 kPa, 10 min); phenotype at 15 dpi. [14]	[14]
Atriplex canescens	AcTIP2;1, AcPIP2;5	60.3-69.5% knockdown	Validated broad applicability of the VIGS system beyond PDS. [14]	[14]
Sunflower	HaPDS	Normalized expression ~0.01	Seed-vacuum protocol with 6h co-cultivation; high infection rate. [4]	[4]
Drosophila (Cell Culture)	trr, osa, brm, snr1	Highest with 5' primers & mRNA template	Primer position and template type significantly impact detected efficiency. [54]	[54]

In plant biotechnology and functional genomics research, accurately monitoring the presence and movement of viral vectors is crucial for assessing the success of experiments such as virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). Within the context of seed vacuum VIGS infiltration protocol research, two powerful and complementary technologies are employed for this purpose: Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reporter systems, which provide visual confirmation of viral infection and spatial distribution, and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), which offers highly sensitive and specific molecular detection. GFP reporter systems allow for real-time, non-destructive tracking of viral spread in living plant tissues, while RT-PCR provides definitive, quantitative validation of viral presence, even at very low concentrations. This application note details the integrated use of these methods to reliably track viral vectors, such as those based on the Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV), following seed vacuum infiltration.

GFP Reporter Systems for Visual Tracking

Principle and Workflow

The Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reporter system enables direct visualization of viral infection and systemic spread within a plant. When a gene encoding GFP is incorporated into a viral vector, the infected plant cells express the fluorescent protein, which can be detected using specific wavelengths of light. This provides researchers with an immediate, non-destructive method to monitor the efficiency and pattern of viral infection.

A general workflow for tracking viral spread using a GFP reporter system is outlined below.

Key Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Monitoring GFP Fluorescence after Seed Vacuum VIGS This protocol is adapted from established VIGS procedures in plants like soybean and Atriplex canescens [3] [25].

• Vector Preparation: Use a viral vector (e.g., pTRV2-GFP) where the GFP gene is under the control of a strong constitutive promoter, such as the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV) 35S promoter [3].
• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Transform the recombinant pTRV2-GFP vector and the helper pTRV1 vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101.
  • Culture single colonies in YEP liquid medium with appropriate antibiotics (e.g., kanamycin, rifampicin) at 28°C with shaking until the OD₆₀₀ reaches 0.6-1.0.
  • Pellet the bacterial cells by centrifugation and resuspend in an infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 200 µM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl₂) to a final OD₆₀₀ of 0.8-1.0 [25]. Mix the pTRV1 and pTRV2-GFP suspensions in a 1:1 ratio and incubate in the dark for 3-4 hours at room temperature.
• Seed Vacuum Infiltration:
  • Prepare germinated seeds. For some species, decortication (removing the seed coat) may improve efficiency [25].
  • Submerge the germinated seeds in the prepared Agrobacterium suspension.
  • Apply a vacuum (e.g., 0.5 kPa) for 5-10 minutes. Slowly release the vacuum to allow the suspension to infiltrate the plant tissues.
  • Briefly rinse the seeds with sterile water and sow them in a suitable growth medium [4] [25].
• Plant Growth and Visualization:
  • Grow the infiltrated plants under standard greenhouse or growth chamber conditions (e.g., 22°C, 16h light/8h dark photoperiod).
  • Begin monitoring for GFP expression 3-7 days post-infiltration (dpi). Initial expression is often localized near the infiltration site (e.g., cotyledons), with systemic spread occurring in newly emerged leaves over 2-3 weeks [55] [3].
  • Visualize GFP using a hand-held UV lamp, a fluorescence stereomicroscope, or a laser scanning confocal microscope. GFP fluorescence is typically detected with excitation at 395-475 nm and emission at 509 nm.

RT-PCR for Molecular Detection

Principle and Workflow

While GFP provides visual evidence, RT-PCR is used for highly sensitive and specific molecular confirmation of viral presence. This technique is particularly crucial for detecting viruses that do not cause clear visual symptoms or for validating GFP observations. It involves converting viral RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA) followed by amplification of a virus-specific genomic fragment.

The one-step RT-PCR process, which combines reverse transcription and PCR amplification in a single tube, is highly efficient for this application.

Key Experimental Protocols

Protocol: One-Step RT-PCR Detection of Tobamovirus This protocol is based on a validated method for detecting Tomato mottle mosaic virus (ToMMV), which can be adapted for other viruses like TRV by using specific primers [56].

• Sample Collection:
  • Collect leaf tissue (approximately 100 mg) from different parts of the plant (infiltrated leaves, systemic leaves, roots). Tissue can be fresh or stored at -80°C.
• Total RNA Extraction:
  • Grind the tissue to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen.
  • Extract total RNA using a commercial kit (e.g., TRIzol reagent or silica column-based kits) following the manufacturer's instructions.
  • Quantify the RNA concentration and assess purity using a spectrophotometer. High-quality RNA should have an A260/A280 ratio of ~2.0.
• One-Step RT-PCR:
  • Prepare the reaction mix in a single tube. A typical 25 µL reaction contains:
    • 12.5 µL of 2x One-Step RT-PCR Buffer
    • 1 µL of Enzyme Mix (Reverse Transcriptase and Taq DNA Polymerase)
    • 0.5 µL each of Forward and Reverse Primer (10 µM)
    • 1 µL of Template RNA (diluted to ~100 ng/µL)
    • 9.5 µL of Nuclease-Free Water
  • For TRV detection, primers targeting the coat protein (CP) gene are commonly used. For example:
    • TRV-CP-F: 5'-GCTTCTGTCAGGAAGCTAGG-3'
    • TRV-CP-R: 5'-TTCAGAACCCTTCAGCACTC-3' (anticipated product size: ~350 bp)
  • Run the reaction in a thermal cycler with the following program [56]:
    • Reverse Transcription: 50°C for 30 minutes.
    • Initial Denaturation: 94°C for 2 minutes.
    • Amplification (35-40 cycles):
      • Denature: 94°C for 30 seconds.
      • Anneal: 55-60°C (primer-specific) for 30 seconds.
      • Extend: 72°C for 1 minute.
    • Final Extension: 72°C for 10 minutes.
• Detection and Analysis:
  • Analyze the RT-PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis (e.g., 1.5% gel).
  • Visualize the DNA bands under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide or a safer alternative.
  • A clear band of the expected size indicates a positive detection of the virus.
  • For absolute confirmation, the PCR product can be purified and sequenced using Sanger sequencing [56].

Comparative Data and Technical Specifications

The table below summarizes the core characteristics of GFP and RT-PCR tracking methods for direct comparison.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Viral Tracking Methods

Feature	GFP Reporter System	RT-PCR Detection
Principle	Visual fluorescence from expressed reporter protein	Enzymatic amplification of viral nucleic acids
Key Equipment	UV lamp, fluorescence microscope	Thermal cycler, gel electrophoresis system
Sensitivity	Moderate (requires sufficient viral titer and expression)	High (detection limit for ToMMV validated at 0.25 pg/μl total RNA) [56]
Specificity	Moderate (depends on promoter and vector stability)	Very High (determined by primer specificity) [56]
Spatial Information	Excellent (shows tissue-level and cellular localization) [3]	Limited (typically requires homogenization of tissue samples)
Time to Result	Minutes (instant visualization)	Several hours (including RNA extraction and amplification)
Primary Application	Rapid screening, spatial mapping of viral spread	Definitive confirmation, sensitivity validation, quantifying infection

To ensure successful implementation of these tracking technologies, specific reagents and materials are essential. The following table lists key research reagent solutions.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Tracking Viral Spread

Reagent / Material	Function / Description	Application Notes
pTRV2-GFP Vector	Plant viral vector expressing Green Fluorescent Protein.	Allows visual tracking of TRV-based VIGS; used with pTRV1 helper vector [3].
Virus-Specific Primers	Oligonucleotides designed to bind unique sequences in the viral genome.	Critical for RT-PCR specificity; e.g., ToMMV coat protein primers yield a 289 bp fragment [56].
One-Step RT-PCR Kit	Combines reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase in a single master mix.	Streamlines detection workflow, reduces handling error [56].
Infiltration Buffer	MES, Acetosyringone, MgCl₂, Silwet-77.	Facilitates Agrobacterium delivery into plant cells during vacuum infiltration [25].
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Disarmed bacterial strain used for plasmid delivery.	Standard workhorse for delivering TRV vectors into plants [4] [3] [25].

Integrated Application in Seed Vacuum VIGS Research

In the context of a seed vacuum VIGS protocol, GFP and RT-PCR are not mutually exclusive but are best used as complementary tools. A typical integrated workflow involves:

• Rapid Screening with GFP: After seed vacuum infiltration with a TRV-GFP vector, plants are periodically screened with a UV lamp. The appearance of green fluorescence in cotyledons and newly emerged leaves provides the first evidence of successful infection and systemic movement, often within 7-15 days post-infiltration [25].
• Molecular Confirmation with RT-PCR: Leaf samples from GFP-positive plants, as well as non-fluorescent controls, are collected. RT-PCR with virus-specific primers provides molecular confirmation of the viral presence, validating the GFP observations and ruling out false positives.
• Efficiency Optimization: The combination of both techniques allows researchers to quantitatively optimize key parameters of the seed vacuum infiltration protocol, such as vacuum pressure/duration and Agrobacterium density (OD600), by correlating them with both fluorescence intensity and PCR band intensity [4] [25].

This multi-faceted approach to tracking viral spread ensures robust and reliable data, forming a solid foundation for subsequent functional genomics studies, such as analyzing the phenotypic effects of silencing a target gene of interest.

Within the broader scope of thesis research on seed vacuum Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) infiltration protocols, this application note provides a comparative analysis of three prominent Agrobacterium-mediated VIGS delivery techniques. As a reverse genetics tool, VIGS leverages plant antiviral defense mechanisms to silence target genes, enabling rapid functional genomics analysis without stable transformation [27] [57]. The efficiency of VIGS is critically dependent on the inoculation method, which must facilitate effective viral entry, replication, and systemic movement throughout the plant [4] [58]. This document evaluates seed vacuum infiltration, leaf injection, and root wounding-immersion methods, providing structured quantitative comparisons, detailed protocols, and practical guidance for researchers selecting appropriate VIGS approaches for their experimental systems.

Technical Principles and Procedural Characteristics

The three VIGS methods employ distinct physical and biological principles to introduce tobacco rattle virus (TRV) vectors into plant tissues:

• Seed Vacuum Infiltration: This method subjects hydrated seeds or young seedlings to vacuum pressure while immersed in Agrobacterium suspension. The vacuum removes air from intercellular spaces, and subsequent repressurization drives the bacterial suspension into tissues primarily through the seed coat or emerging embryonic tissues [4] [35]. The protocol typically includes a co-cultivation period (e.g., 6 hours) to enhance bacterial infection before transferring plants to growth media [4].

• Leaf Injection (Agroinfiltration): This approach uses a needleless syringe to apply mechanical pressure for forcing Agrobacterium suspension directly into the air spaces of leaf mesophyll tissue through stomata or minor wounds [35]. It relies on creating temporary openings in the leaf epidermis without causing permanent damage, allowing direct access to interior tissues.

• Root Wounding-Immersion: This method combines physical root damage with immersion in bacterial suspension. Approximately one-third of the root length is cut longitudinally before immersion in Agrobacterium suspension for 30 minutes [27] [57]. The wounding creates entry points for the virus, while immersion ensures prolonged contact between the inoculum and damaged tissues.

Comparative Performance Metrics

Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of VIGS Method Efficiencies Across Plant Species

Plant Species	Seed Vacuum Efficiency	Leaf Injection Efficiency	Root Wounding Efficiency	Key Observations
Sunflower	62-91% (genotype dependent) [4]	Not reported	Not applicable	Highest efficiency (91%) in 'Smart SM-64B'; phenotype spreading varied by genotype [4]
Tomato	Not specified	Conventional method [3]	95-100% silencing rate [27] [57]	Root method showed near-complete silencing; leaf injection impeded by thick cuticle/dense trichomes in some species [3]
Soybean	Not specified	Low efficiency due to thick cuticle and dense trichomes [3]	Not reported	Cotyledon node immersion achieved 65-95% silencing [3]
Nicotiana benthamiana	Not specified	Standard method [35]	95-100% silencing rate [27] [57]	Root method highly effective in model species
Catharanthus roseus	Effective in 5-day-old etiolated seedlings [35]	Pinch wounding method available [35]	Not reported	Vacuum infiltration successful where other methods vary

Table 2: Technical and Practical Considerations for VIGS Method Selection

Parameter	Seed Vacuum	Leaf Injection	Root Wounding-Immersion
Optimal Plant Stage	Seeds, germinated seeds, or young sprouts [4] [35]	3-6 leaf stage [58]	Seedlings with 3-4 true leaves (3 weeks old) [27]
Labor Intensity	Moderate (setup required)	High (manual processing)	Moderate (root processing required)
Equipment Needs	Vacuum chamber, pump	Needleless syringes	Containers for immersion
Throughput Capacity	High (batch processing)	Low (individual plants)	High (batch processing)
Typical Inoculation Duration	Vacuum cycles + 6h co-cultivation [4]	Minutes per plant	30-minute immersion [27]
Recovery Considerations	Direct transfer to growth medium [4]	Brief recovery needed	48h dark treatment post-inoculation [27]

Method Selection Workflow

The following decision pathway illustrates the logical process for selecting an appropriate VIGS method based on experimental requirements and plant species characteristics:

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Seed Vacuum Infiltration Protocol

Principle: Utilizing pressure differences to introduce Agrobacterium into seeds and young sprouts [4] [35].

Materials:

• Sunflower seeds (coat partially removed)
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 with pTRV1 and pTRV2 constructs
• LB medium with appropriate antibiotics
• Vacuum infiltration apparatus
• Growth medium (peat:perlite, 3:1)

Procedure:

• Plant Material Preparation: Partially remove seed coats to enhance infiltration. Hydrate seeds if necessary.
• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Streak Agrobacterium from glycerol stocks onto LB agar plates with antibiotics (gentamicin 10 µg/mL, kanamycin 50 µg/mL, rifampicin 100 µg/mL).
  • Incubate at 28°C for 1.5 days.
  • Select 2-3 single colonies to inoculate liquid LB medium with the same antibiotics.
  • Grow overnight at 28°C with shaking (200 rpm) until OD600 reaches 0.8-1.0.
  • Centrifuge bacterial culture and resuspend in infiltration medium (10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 150 µM acetosyringone).
  • Incubate bacterial suspension in the dark at 28°C for 3-4 hours.
• Vacuum Infiltration:
  • Place seeds or sprouts in Agrobacterium suspension.
  • Apply vacuum (pressure and duration optimized for species, typically 0.5-1 bar for 5-15 minutes).
  • Slowly release vacuum to allow infiltration.
• Co-cultivation: Transfer infiltrated seeds to co-cultivation medium for 6 hours [4].
• Plant Recovery: Transfer seeds to growth medium without surface sterilization [4].
• Growth Conditions: Maintain at 22°C with 18-h light/6-h dark photoperiod, approximately 45% relative humidity.

Troubleshooting:

• Low silencing efficiency: Optimize vacuum pressure/duration; verify bacterial concentration; test different co-cultivation times.
• Poor seed germination: Reduce vacuum intensity; shorten infiltration time.
• Bacterial overgrowth: Include appropriate antibiotics in growth medium; ensure proper sterile technique.

Leaf Injection Protocol

Principle: Mechanical introduction of Agrobacterium suspension into leaf mesophyll using needleless syringe [35] [58].

Materials:

• Plants at 3-6 leaf stage
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens with TRV vectors
• Needleless syringes (1-mL volume)
• Infiltration buffer

Procedure:

• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Grow Agrobacterium as described in Section 3.1.
  • Adjust concentration to OD600 = 0.5-1.0 in infiltration buffer.
• Plant Preparation: Select young, fully expanded leaves for injection.
• Infiltration Technique:
  • Place syringe tip against abaxial leaf surface.
  • Gently apply pressure while supporting opposite side of leaf.
  • Infiltrate until liquid spreads through most of the leaf area.
  • Mark infiltrated areas for future reference.
• Post-Inoculation Care:
  • Maintain high humidity for 24 hours.
  • Grow plants at species-appropriate temperatures (20-25°C).

Troubleshooting:

• Leaf damage: Apply less pressure; use younger leaves.
• Limited spread: Ensure infiltration buffer contains acetosyringone; verify bacterial viability.
• Photobleaching only in infiltrated areas: Virus may not be moving systemically; check plant age and growing conditions.

Root Wounding-Immersion Protocol

Principle: Combining physical root damage with immersion to introduce TRV vectors through root system [27] [57].

Materials:

• 3-week-old seedlings with 3-4 true leaves
• Agrobacterium GV1301 with pTRV1 and pTRV2 constructs
• Sterilized soil (peat:vermiculite mix)
• Disinfected leaf knife or scalpel
• Containers for immersion

Procedure:

• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Prepare Agrobacterium cultures as described in Section 3.1.
  • Mix TRV1 and TRV2 cultures in 1:1 ratio.
  • Adjust to OD600 = 0.8 in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES pH 5.6, 150 µM acetosyringone).
• Root Processing:
  • Carefully remove seedlings from soil.
  • Gently wash roots with pure water to remove soil.
  • Using disinfected tool, cut approximately 1/3 of root length longitudinally.
• Inoculation Methods:
  • Concurrent Inoculation: Immerse wounded roots in TRV1:TRV2 mixed solution for 30 minutes [27] [57].
  • Successive Inoculation: Immerse in TRV1 solution for 15 minutes, then transfer to TRV2 solution for 15 minutes.
• Shaking: Agitate containers every 5 minutes during immersion.
• Transplanting: Transfer inoculated seedlings to 50-cell trays with sterilized soil.
• Post-Inoculation Treatment: Maintain plants in dark for 48 hours, then return to normal growth conditions (16-h light/8-h dark at 20-28°C).

Troubleshooting:

• Plant wilting: Reduce root damage; ensure proper hydration after transplanting.
• Low silencing: Verify root wounding extent; optimize immersion time; check bacterial concentration.
• Infection variability: Standardize root cutting method; ensure uniform immersion.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes	Typical Concentration/Usage
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	TRV vector delivery	Preferred strain for VIGS; compatible with wide range of plant species [4] [3]	OD600 = 0.8-1.0 in infiltration buffer
pTRV1 and pTRV2 Vectors	Viral vector system	TRV provides broad host range, mild symptoms, efficient silencing [27] [3]	Equal volumes of pTRV1 and pTRV2 Agrobacterium cultures
Acetosyringone	Inducer of virulence genes	Enhances Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer; critical for efficient infection [27] [3]	150-200 μM in infiltration buffer
Infiltration Buffer	Vehicle for Agrobacterium	Maintains bacterial viability and facilitates plant infection	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6
Antibiotics	Selection pressure	Maintains plasmid integrity in bacterial cultures	Kanamycin (50 μg/mL), rifampicin (25-100 μg/mL), gentamicin (10 μg/mL)
PDS Gene Fragment	Visual silencing marker	Phytoene desaturase silencing causes photobleaching; validates system efficiency [27] [58]	200-300 bp fragment cloned into pTRV2

This comparative analysis demonstrates that VIGS method selection requires careful consideration of plant species, experimental goals, and practical constraints. The seed vacuum protocol offers particular promise for challenging species like sunflowers and medicinal plants, with efficiencies reaching 91% in optimized systems [4]. Root wounding-immersion achieves remarkable 95-100% silencing in solanaceous species and provides unique advantages for root biology studies [27] [57]. While leaf injection faces limitations with thick-cuticled species like soybean, modified approaches using cotyledon nodes achieve 65-95% silencing efficiency [3].

Within the broader thesis context of seed vacuum VIGS protocol research, these findings highlight both the robustness of vacuum-based methods and their genotype-dependent performance, suggesting future optimization pathways. The detailed protocols and comparative data provided herein equip researchers with practical tools for implementing these techniques across diverse plant systems, advancing functional genomics capabilities in both model and non-model species.

ASSESSING SILENCING DURATION AND STABILITY ACROSS PLANT DEVELOPMENT STAGES

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) is a powerful tool for functional genomics, enabling rapid analysis of gene function by silencing target genes post-transcriptionally. The seed vacuum infiltration protocol represents a significant advancement for applying VIGS in challenging species like sunflower, offering a simple and efficient method without requiring in vitro recovery steps [4]. Understanding the dynamics of silencing—its initiation, duration, and stability—across different developmental stages is crucial for experimental design and data interpretation. This application note synthesizes experimental data and protocols to assess these key temporal aspects of VIGS.

QUANTITATIVE SILENCING DYNAMICS DATA

The following tables summarize key quantitative findings on silencing efficiency and dynamics from relevant VIGS studies.

Table 1: VIGS Efficiency and Timing in Different Plant Species and Genotypes

Plant Species/Genotype	Infection/VIGS Efficiency	First Phenotype Observation	Key Experimental Factor	Reference
Sunflower (various genotypes)	62% - 91% (varies by genotype)	Not explicitly stated	Seed vacuum infiltration	[4]
Sunflower ('ZS' line)	Up to 77% infection rate	Not explicitly stated	6h co-cultivation post-infiltration	[4]
Soybean ('Tianlong 1')	65% - 95% silencing efficiency	21 days post-inoculation (dpi)	Cotyledon node agroinfiltration	[3]

Table 2: Dynamics of Silencing Spread and Viral Presence

Observed Phenomenon	Experimental Finding	Implication for Silencing Stability	Reference
Silencing spread in young vs. mature tissue	"More active spreading" in young tissues	Silencing is more dynamic and potent in newly formed organs	[4]
TRV mobility	TRV detected in non-silenced (green) tissues and up to node 9	Viral presence does not guarantee visible silencing; systemic spread is extensive	[4]
Plant developmental timing	Developmental transitions are "growth-dependent," influenced by environment	Silencing duration may vary with plant growth rate and conditions	[59]

DETAILED EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOLS

Protocol 1: Seed Vacuum VIGS Infiltration for Sunflower

This protocol is adapted from the study advancing VIGS in sunflower [4].

• Plant Material Preparation: Use sunflower seeds with seed coats peeled. No surface sterilization or in vitro recovery is required.
• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Transform the required TRV vectors (e.g., pYL192:TRV1 and pYL156:TRV2 containing the target gene fragment) into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 [4].
  • Streak glycerol stocks on LB-agar plates with appropriate antibiotics (e.g., 10 µg/mL gentamicin, 50 µg/mL kanamycin, 100 µg/mL rifampicin) and incubate at 28°C for 1.5 days [4].
  • Inoculate liquid cultures from single colonies and grow to desired density.
• Infiltration:
  • Suspend the Agrobacterium cultures in infiltration medium (e.g., 10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 200 µM acetosyringone).
  • Mix the TRV1 and TRV2 Agrobacterium suspensions in a 1:1 ratio.
  • Subject the peeled seeds to vacuum infiltration in the bacterial suspension.
• Co-cultivation: Following infiltration, co-cultivate the seeds for 6 hours for optimal results [4].
• Plant Growth: Sow co-cultivated seeds directly in soil (e.g., a 3:1 peat:perlite mix) and grow under controlled conditions (e.g., 22°C, 18-h light/6-h dark photoperiod) [4].

Protocol 2: Cotyledon Node Agroinfiltration for Soybean

This protocol describes an efficient TRV-VIGS method for soybean [3].

• Plant Material Preparation:
  • Surface sterilize soybean seeds.
  • Soak them in sterile water until swollen.
  • longitudinally bisect the seeds to create half-seed explants [3].
• Agrobacterium Preparation:
  • Use A. tumefaciens GV3101 harboring the pTRV1 and pTRV2-derived vectors.
  • Prepare bacterial suspensions in a suitable induction medium.
• Infection:
  • Immerse the fresh half-seed explants in the Agrobacterium suspension for 20-30 minutes [3].
  • Explants can be co-cultivated on medium for several days post-infection.
• Efficiency Evaluation: On the fourth day post-infection, excision of part of the hypocotyl under sterile conditions allows for observation of GFP fluorescence under a microscope to confirm infection, with effective efficiency exceeding 80% [3].
• Phenotype Monitoring: Silencing phenotypes, such as photobleaching in GmPDS-silenced plants, can be observed from 21 days post-inoculation onwards [3].

VISUALIZATION OF WORKFLOWS AND RELATIONSHIPS

VIGS Experimental and Assessment Workflow

The following diagram outlines the key stages from plant preparation to the assessment of silencing dynamics across development.

Factors Influencing Silencing Dynamics

This diagram illustrates the core factors that determine the observed stability and duration of VIGS.

THE SCIENTIST'S TOOLKIT: KEY RESEARCH REAGENT SOLUTIONS

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Seed Vacuum VIGS Protocols

Item	Function/Description	Example/Specification
TRV Vectors	Binary viral vectors for VIGS; TRV1 contains replication genes, TRV2 carries the target gene fragment.	pYL192 (TRV1), pYL156 (TRV2) [4]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	Bacterial strain used as a vehicle to deliver the TRV vectors into plant cells.	GV3101 [4] [3]
Antibiotics	Select for transformed Agrobacterium and prevent contamination.	Kanamycin, Gentamicin, Rifampicin [4]
Infiltration Medium	Liquid suspension for Agrobacterium during infiltration, often containing an inducer.	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 200 µM Acetosyringone [4]
Target Gene Fragment	A specific portion of the target gene (e.g., 100-300 bp) cloned into the TRV2 vector to trigger silencing.	e.g., 193 bp fragment of HaPDS [4]

The seed vacuum VIGS protocol provides a robust platform for initiating systemic gene silencing. Assessing the resulting silencing dynamics reveals that it is not a uniform process but is influenced by plant genotype, developmental stage, and tissue type. Key findings indicate that silencing manifests more actively in young tissues and that the virus can spread beyond visibly silenced areas. A comprehensive assessment of silencing duration and stability should therefore integrate phenotypic monitoring with molecular tools like qPCR across multiple developmental stages to build a complete temporal and spatial picture of gene silencing.

Conclusion

Seed vacuum VIGS infiltration represents a robust, efficient, and accessible methodology for rapid gene function analysis, particularly valuable for non-model species and high-throughput screening. By integrating foundational principles with optimized protocols, researchers can achieve high silencing efficiencies exceeding 90% in some systems, as demonstrated in soybean and tomato. The future of this technology lies in its integration with multi-omics approaches and CRISPR-based systems, enabling comprehensive functional genomics studies. For biomedical and clinical research, the principles of efficient macromolecule delivery via vacuum infiltration offer promising parallels for therapeutic agent development, positioning seed vacuum VIGS as a cornerstone technique in modern plant biotechnology with broad implications for agricultural and pharmaceutical sciences.

References

• 1. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) in Functional Genomics [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/11/11/1297]
• 2. Comprehensive Mechanism of Gene Silencing and Its Role ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.705249/full]
• 3. Efficient Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Method for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12115190/]
• 4. Advancing virus-induced gene silencing in sunflower [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-024-01241-z]
• 5. A newly established virus-induced gene silencing method ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926669021008050]
• 6. Development of a robust and efficient virus-induced gene ... [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-024-01320-1]
• 7. Vacuum and Co-cultivation Agroinfiltration of (Germinated) ... [https://www.lifescience.net/publications/1553721/vacuum-and-co-cultivation-agroinfiltration-of-germ/]
• 8. Selection of stable reference genes for accurate reverse- ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-08940-0]
• 9. In planta transformation methods to accelerate the ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1638144/full]
• 10. Vacuum infiltration for priming of soybean seeds [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/sc/d4sc08566c]
• 11. Protocol for imbibed seed piercing for Agrobacterium- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666166723007347]
• 12. Virus-Induced Genome Editing (VIGE): One Step Away ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/10/4599]
• 13. An Efficient Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12388925/]
• 14. based virus-induced gene Silencing in Atriplex canescens [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12330136/]
• 15. Highly Efficient Virus-induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2533598/]
• 16. Vacuum and Co-cultivation Agroinfiltration of (Germinated ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5360694/]
• 17. Vacuum and Co-cultivation Agroinfiltration of (Germinated) ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.00393/full]
• 18. Establishing a Virus-Induced Gene Silencing System ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10346259/]
• 19. US7229829B2 - Tobacco rattle virus vectors and related ... [https://patents.google.com/patent/US7229829B2/en]
• 20. Development of tobacco rattle virus-based platform for dual ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168945222003168]
• 21. An all-in-one plant virus-based vector toolkit ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12365833/]
• 22. Tobacco Rattle Virus as a Tool for Rapid Reverse-Genetics ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8838890/]
• 23. Developing and applying a virus-induced gene silencing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111924009685]
• 24. A Methodological Advance of Tobacco Rattle Virus ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.671091/full]
• 25. based virus-induced gene Silencing in Atriplex canescens [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-025-01427-z]
• 26. A Ligation-Independent Cloning Tobacco Rattle Virus Vector ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2151726/]
• 27. Establishment and application of a root wounding ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1336726/full]
• 28. An optimized protocol for in vitro regeneration and genetic ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11899-x]
• 29. Arabidopsis transformation by vacuum infiltration [https://staceylab.missouri.edu/arabidopsis-transformation-by-vacuum-infiltration/]
• 30. Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated gene ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44372-025-00116-4]
• 31. An efficient overexpression method for studying genes in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8793271/]
• 32. Optimizations of Laboratory-scale Vacuum-assisted ... [https://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=ajbkr.2014.1.14]
• 33. An Efficient Rice Virus-Induced Gene Silencing System ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/5818]
• 34. In-planta transient transformation of avocado (Persea ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11240-022-02436-9]
• 35. A Cotyledon-based Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (Cotyledon ... [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-024-01154-x]
• 36. A VIGS screen identifies immunity in the Arabidopsis Pla‐1 ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5725698/]
• 37. Establishment of a Virus-Induced Gene-Silencing (VIGS) ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/1/392]
• 38. Development and application of virus-induced gene ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030442382300763X]
• 39. Establishment of a Virus-Induced Gene Silencing System ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/2/150]
• 40. Agrobacterium infection and plant defense—transformation ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3866890/]
• 41. Efficient method of seed transformation via Agrobacterium ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926669018300505]
• 42. Establishment of an Efficient Agrobacterium rhizogenes ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12349569/]
• 43. Infection of Embryonic Callus with Agrobacterium Enables ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/2/279]
• 44. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-Mediated Transformation for ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/17/2747]
• 45. Vacuum-Forced Agroinfiltration for In planta Transformation ... [https://www.jove.com/t/66024/vacuum-forced-agroinfiltration-for-planta-transformation-recalcitrant]
• 46. Enhancement of Virus-induced Gene Silencing in Tomato ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1016847823129141]
• 47. Construction and optimization of the TRV-mediated VIGS ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030442382400774X]
• 48. Differential humidity effects on seed viability and oxidative ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12522937/]
• 49. Enhancing virus-induced gene silencing efficiency in tea ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423824007398]
• 50. Application and Expansion of Virus-Induced Gene ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/8/934]
• 51. Silencing of the phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene affects ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6777038/]
• 52. Efficient Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in Arabidopsis - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1557620/]
• 53. Virus-induced Phytoene Desaturase (PDS) Gene Silencing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468014118302516]
• 54. Optimal RNA isolation method and primer design to detect gene... [https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-017-2959-0]
• 55. Frontiers | Viral -based transient expression vector for plant... systems [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1598673/full]
• 56. Validation of a one-step reverse transcription PCR ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1535175/full]
• 57. Establishment and application of a root wounding ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11066161/]
• 58. An Optimized Protocol to Increase Virus-Induced Gene ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3893464/]
• 59. Developmental timing in plants - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10965974/]