Microbial Photosynthesis for Spaceflight Air Revitalization: From Bioregenerative Systems to Clinical Research Applications

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of microbial photosynthesis as a sustainable technology for air revitalization in long-duration space missions. Targeting researchers and scientific professionals, we explore the foundational principles of using cyanobacteria and microalgae in Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS), examining current methodologies from photobioreactor design to synthetic biology applications. The content addresses significant challenges including microgravity adaptation, biofilm management, and system optimization, while presenting validation data from spaceflight experiments and comparative performance analyses. By synthesizing findings from recent space biology research and ground-based analogs, this review establishes a critical knowledge base for developing closed-loop life support systems and examines potential biomedical applications of microbial photosynthesis research for terrestrial health innovations.

The Science of Breathing in Space: Fundamentals of Microbial Air Revitalization

The Critical Limitations of Physicochemical Life Support Systems for Deep Space Missions

Human space exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is fundamentally constrained by a trinity of critical factors: logistics costs, technological limits, and human health and safety risks [1]. Current missions primarily rely on physicochemical Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) to maintain human presence by providing atmospheric control, water recovery, and waste management [2]. These systems, while effective for near-Earth operations, face severe limitations when applied to endurance-class deep space missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. The mass, volume, and resupply requirements of physicochemical systems create prohibitive logistical challenges for missions where resupply is impossible or significantly delayed [1] [3]. This technical analysis examines these limitations through the lens of bioregenerative life support systems (BLSS), with specific focus on air revitalization through microbial photosynthesis as a sustainable alternative for long-duration space exploration.

Fundamental Limitations of Physicochemical Life Support Systems

Resource Dependency and Resupply Logistics

Physicochemical ECLSS operate on primarily open-loop or partially closed-loop principles, requiring regular resupply of consumable materials from Earth. NASA's current approach explicitly "relies on resupply of food, some water, and other consumable materials required for physical/chemical-based environmental closed loop life support systems (ECLSS)" [1]. This dependency creates critical vulnerabilities for deep space missions where resupply windows can span years rather than months.

Table 1: Resupply Dependency of Key Physicochemical System Components

System Component	Consumable Requirements	Resupply Interval	Mass Penalty
Carbon Dioxide Removal	Zeolite beds, chemical sorbents	90-180 days (typical)	15-30 kg/crew-year
Oxygen Generation	Water (for electrolysis)	Continuous	~1 kg/crew-day
Trace Contaminant Control	Activated carbon, catalysts	180-360 days	5-15 kg/crew-year
Water Recovery	Filters, catalyst beds	180-270 days	10-25 kg/crew-year

The logistical burden compounds exponentially with mission duration and distance. A Mars mission with a 7-month transit each way and 18-month surface stay would require approximately 3,285 kg of oxygen alone based on crew consumption of 0.84 kg/day for 4 crew members, plus additional mass for storage and processing systems [3].

Single-Point Failure Vulnerabilities

Physicochemical systems exhibit limited redundancy and cross-system integration, creating critical single-point failure modes that threaten mission success and crew safety. Unlike bioregenerative systems with inherent biological redundancy, mechanical components like CO₂ scrubbers, oxygen generators, and water processors represent potential catastrophic failure points. The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) in 2004 further exacerbated this vulnerability by discontinuing and physically demolishing NASA's Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) habitat demonstration program, eliminating a crucial backup technology pathway [1].

Limited Closure of Material Cycles

Despite technological advances, physicochemical systems achieve only partial closure of essential element cycles, particularly for carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. Current ISS systems recover approximately 90% of water but significantly less of other vital elements. Food production remains almost entirely dependent on resupply, with minimal integration of waste streams back into consumable production. This limitation becomes increasingly problematic as mission duration extends, creating accumulating waste management challenges while failing to utilize potential resources contained in metabolic wastes [3].

Bioregenerative Life Support: Microbial Photosynthesis for Air Revitalization

Theoretical Foundation of Biological Air Revitalization

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) utilize biological processes to regenerate air, water, and food from waste streams, dramatically reducing resupply requirements. The fundamental reaction of microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization can be summarized as:

CO₂ + H₂O + Light → Biomass + O₂

This process simultaneously addresses two critical life support functions: carbon dioxide removal and oxygen production, while additionally generating edible biomass [3] [4]. The European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) project exemplifies this approach, using a closed-loop system of microorganisms and higher plants to recycle waste into oxygen, water, and food [3].

Microbial Candidates for Space Applications

Table 2: Promising Microbial Candidates for Air Revitalization in BLSS

Microbial Species	Primary Function	Growth Conditions	O₂ Production Rate	Advantages
Limnospira indica	Photosynthetic O₂ production, CO₂ removal	Moderate light, 25-35°C	0.5-1.2 mg O₂/L/h [4]	High protein content, radiation tolerance
Euglena gracilis	CO₂ removal, biomass production	Wide tolerance range	0.3-0.8 mg O₂/L/h	Mixotrophic capability, paramylon production
Chlorella vulgaris	O₂ production, water polishing	High light, 20-30°C	0.4-1.0 mg O₂/L/h	Rapid growth, high harvest index
Anabaena cylindrica	N₂ fixation, O₂ production	Low N, moderate light	0.2-0.6 mg O₂/L/h	Dual functionality, circadian rhythm

Recent research on Limnospira indica (formerly Arthrospira sp.) demonstrates its particular suitability for space applications, showing maintained photosynthetic performance after extended dormancy periods necessary for transport to space stations [4]. This cyanobacterium achieves efficient air revitalization while providing high-value nutritional biomass containing 60-70% protein by dry weight.

Experimental Protocol: Assessing Microbial Photosynthetic Performance

Objective: Evaluate the photosynthetic O₂ production and CO₂ consumption capabilities of candidate microorganisms under simulated space conditions.

Materials and Methods:

• Organism and Cultivation:

  • Obtain Limnospira indica PCC8005 from culture collections
  • Maintain in modified Zarrouk's medium at 25°C under continuous illumination (50 μmol photons/m²/s)

• Storage Condition Simulation:

  • Divide cultures into three treatment groups:
    • Group A: Control (continuous growth conditions)
    • Group B: Cold/dark storage (4°C, complete darkness)
    • Group C: Microgravity simulation (using random positioning machine)
  • Apply storage conditions for 1, 2, 3, and 4-week intervals

• Post-Storage Reactivation Assessment:

  • Inoculate stored cultures into fresh medium
  • Monitor O₂ production rates using Clark-type electrodes
  • Quantify CO₂ consumption via infrared gas analysis
  • Assess photosynthetic efficiency through Pulse-Amplitude Modulated (PAM) fluorometry
  • Analyze biomass composition (proteins, carbohydrates, lipids)

• Data Collection Schedule:

  • Baseline measurements pre-storage
  • Daily monitoring for 7 days post-reactivation
  • Endpoint analyses at day 7 [4]

Comparative System Analysis: Physicochemical vs. Bioregenerative Approaches

Performance Metrics and Operational Parameters

Table 3: Comprehensive Comparison of Life Support Technologies for Deep Space Missions

Parameter	Physicochemical Systems	Bioregenerative Systems (Microbial)	Bioregenerative Systems (Plant-Based)
Closure Level	60-90% (water only)	85-95% (theoretical)	90-98% (theoretical)
O₂ Production Efficiency	0.8-1.2 kWh/kg O₂	0.3-0.6 kWh/kg O₂	0.5-1.0 kWh/kg O₂
CO₂ Removal Efficiency	1.5-2.5 kWh/kg CO₂	0.5-1.2 kWh/kg CO₂	0.8-1.8 kWh/kg CO₂
Mass Penalty (4 crew, 3 years)	8,000-12,000 kg	3,000-5,000 kg	4,000-7,000 kg
Crew Time Requirement	1-2 hours/crew-day	0.5-1 hour/crew-day	2-4 hours/crew-day
Technology Readiness Level	TRL 9 (flight proven)	TRL 4-6 (ground demo)	TRL 3-5 (experimental)
Failure Resilience	Low (single-point failures)	Medium (biological redundancy)	High (ecological redundancy)
Additional Benefits	None	Nutritional biomass, radiation shielding	Psychological benefits, dietary variety

The data reveals that microbial-based BLSS offers significant advantages in mass efficiency and energy requirements for oxygen production and carbon dioxide removal, with the additional benefit of generating edible biomass [3] [4]. However, physicochemical systems maintain advantages in technological maturity and predictable performance.

Integration Challenges and Hybrid Approach Potential

A complete transition from physicochemical to bioregenerative systems presents significant engineering and biological challenges. System stability, microbial community dynamics, and response to space environments require extensive characterization before implementation in crewed missions. A pragmatic intermediate approach involves hybrid systems combining reliable physicochemical components with progressively integrated biological elements.

The Research Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for Microbial Photosynthesis Experiments

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Example	Considerations for Space Use
Zarrouk's Medium	Culture growth medium for cyanobacteria	Provides essential nutrients for Limnospira indica	May require modification for recycling in closed systems
Clark-type Electrode	Dissolved oxygen measurement	Quantifying photosynthetic O₂ production rates	Requires calibration for space environments
PAM Fluorometer	Photosynthetic efficiency assessment	Measuring PSII quantum yield	Miniaturized versions needed for flight
Random Positioning Machine	Microgravity simulation	Ground-based studies of microgravity effects	Limited simulation accuracy (≈10⁻³ g)
LED Lighting Systems	Photosynthesis energy source	Optimizing light spectra for O₂ production	Energy efficiency critical for mission applications
Gas Chromatography System	Gas composition analysis	Monitoring CO₂ uptake and O₂ production rates	Requires space-qualified hardware
Molecular Biology Kits	Genetic analysis	Monitoring microbial community stability	Must function in microgravity conditions
Cryopreservation Solutions	Long-term culture storage	Backup systems for culture restoration	Cold storage capabilities required

The critical limitations of physicochemical life support systems present significant barriers to sustainable human presence beyond Low Earth Orbit. While these systems provide immediate, reliable solutions for short-duration missions, their mass penalties, resupply dependencies, and limited closure efficiency make them unsuitable for endurance-class missions to Mars and beyond. Microbial photosynthesis-based air revitalization systems offer a promising alternative, simultaneously addressing carbon dioxide removal, oxygen production, and food generation through biologically coordinated processes. The strategic imperative is clear: accelerated investment in bioregenerative technology development is essential to address current capability gaps and ensure sustainable human exploration of deep space. As noted in recent analyses, "These gaps pose a strategic risk to US leadership in human space exploration that must be addressed urgently to sustain international competitiveness" [1]. The integration of microbial photosynthesis represents not merely a technical improvement but a fundamental paradigm shift toward truly sustainable human presence in space.

Long-duration human space exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit, such as crewed missions to Mars, requires a paradigm shift in life support technology. The current physicochemical systems aboard the International Space Station (ISS) can only partially recycle water and regain a fraction of oxygen, while being unable to produce food, making regular resupply missions from Earth necessary [5]. For distant missions where resupply is impractical, Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) become essential—these systems "close the loop" by regenerating air, food, water, and other vital resources using biological processes, significantly reducing dependence on Earth [5] [6].

Among potential biological components, photosynthetic microorganisms—particularly cyanobacteria and microalgae—offer compelling advantages for space applications. They can produce high amounts of edible biomass rapidly using fewer resources compared to higher plants, while simultaneously revitalizing air through photosynthetic carbon dioxide absorption and oxygen production [5] [7]. This technical review examines the current state of research, mechanistic foundations, experimental protocols, and future directions for implementing cyanobacteria and microalgae as cornerstone components of BLSS for human space exploration.

Advantages of Photosynthetic Microorganisms in BLSS

Comparative Benefits Over Higher Plants and Physicochemical Systems

Microalgae and cyanobacteria present several operational advantages for space BLSS when compared to traditional crop plants or solely physicochemical systems:

• Superior Edible Biomass Productivity: Microalgae can produce edible biomass more quickly than most higher plants, with less water and smaller physical footprint [5].
• Waste Recycling Capabilities: Multiple species demonstrate ability to grow on human-derived wastewaters and space-derived resources (e.g., Martian regolith), facilitating in situ resource utilization [5].
• Continuous Operation: Unlike higher plants which have growth cycles, microbial cultures can be maintained continuously with proper harvesting strategies.
• Nutritional Value: Microalgal biomass contains significant proteins, lipids, vitamins, and antioxidants, providing nutritional supplementation for crew diets [5].

Air Revitalization Performance

The air revitalization function is quantitatively critical for crew survival. Each crew member consumes approximately 0.82 kg d⁻¹ of O₂ and produces 1.04 kg d⁻¹ of CO₂ [7]. Current ISS systems rely on a combination of Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) via water electrolysis, and a Carbon Dioxide Reduction Assembly (CRA) using the Sabatier process, which vents methane into space resulting in resource loss [5] [7]. In contrast, photosynthetic microorganisms convert CO₂ directly to O₂ and biomass, potentially achieving complete carbon recycling without venting losses.

Table 1: Comparison of Life Support Technologies for Space Applications

Technology	O₂ Production	CO₂ Removal	Food Production	Closure	Suitable Mission Duration
Physicochemical (ISS)	Partial (via electrolysis)	Partial (CDRA + Sabatier)	None	Low	Short-term (LEO)
Higher Plants	Complete	Complete	Complete	High	Long-term (Moon/Mars)
Microalgae/Cyanobacteria	Complete	Complete	Partial nutritional support	Medium-High	All durations

Biological Mechanisms and Adaptive Strategies

Photosynthetic Machinery and Light Acclimation

Cyanobacteria possess remarkable adaptability to diverse light environments, employing several sophisticated photoacclimation strategies that make them particularly suitable for BLSS, where light conditions may be controlled but subject to system constraints:

• Chromatic Acclimation (CA): Cyanobacteria restructure their phycobilisomes—their primary light-harvesting antennae complexes—by altering phycobiliproteins, linker proteins, or pigment composition to optimize absorption of available light wavelengths [8].
• Photoprotection Mechanisms: Under high light stress, cyanobacteria activate non-photochemical quenching using orange carotenoid protein (OCP), iron starvation-induced protein (IsiA), and high light-induced proteins (HliPs) to safely dissipate excess excitation energy [8].
• State Transitions: Under low light conditions, cyanobacteria reversibly associate their phycobilisomes with Photosystem II (PSII) and Photosystem I (PSI) to optimize light harvesting efficiency [8].
• Antioxidant Systems: When photoprotective mechanisms are overwhelmed, various antioxidative systems activate to shield cells from oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8].

These natural strategies provide a blueprint for engineering strains with enhanced performance characteristics for BLSS applications.

Diagram: Cyanobacterial Photoprotection Pathways

The following diagram illustrates key photoprotection and photoacclimation mechanisms in cyanobacteria under high light stress:

Diagram 1: Cyanobacterial photoprotection pathways under high light stress, showing the coordination between non-photochemical quenching, electron transport regulation, and chromatic acclimation mechanisms.

Experimental Implementation and Protocols

Cultivation Systems and Photobioreactor Design

The design of cultivation systems for space applications must address the unique challenges of microgravity environment, including altered gas-liquid transfer phenomena and the need for compact, efficient designs [7]. Several photobioreactor configurations have been tested for space applications:

• Channel-Type Ponds: Used in ground-based studies with capacities up to one ton, suitable for scaling microalgae cultivation [9].
• Microfluidic Bioreactors: Emerging platforms like the AnuJIVA CubeSat-based system integrate microfluidic bioreactors with autonomous decision-making for precise nutrient delivery and contamination resistance [10].
• MELiSSA Pilot Plant: The European Space Agency's Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative program includes a pilot plant in Spain testing interconnected compartments for closed-loop oxygen, water, and food production [6].

Table 2: Quantitative Performance Data of Selected Microalgae and Cyanobacteria for BLSS

Species	Growth Rate	O₂ Production	CO₂ Uptake	Edible Biomass Yield	Key Metabolites
Chlorella sp.	High (doubling in hours)	1.2-1.8 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [7]	2.0-3.0 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [7]	18.3% yield increase vs. control [9]	Proteins, lipids, vitamins
Spirulina (Arthrospira)	Moderate-high	1.0-1.5 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [5]	1.8-2.5 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [5]	Annual production: 3000 dry tons [5]	Proteins, γ-linolenic acid
Scenedesmus obliquus	Moderate	0.8-1.2 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [9]	1.5-2.2 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [9]	2.7% yield increase vs. control [9]	Proteins, antioxidants
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803	Moderate	0.9-1.3 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [8]	1.6-2.4 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [8]	Engineered for bioplastics [8]	Sucrose, biofuels

Standardized Experimental Protocol for Microalgae Cultivation

Based on published methodologies for BLSS-relevant microalgae research, the following protocol provides a standardized approach for evaluating candidate strains:

Culture Establishment and Maintenance

• Strain Selection: Obtain axenic cultures of target species (e.g., Chlorella sp. SAG 242.80, Scenedesmus obliquus ACUF 342) from culture collections.
• Inoculum Preparation: Grow initial cultures in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing appropriate basal medium (e.g., Erddekokt + Salze medium), then scale up to 2000 mL flasks to increase microalgae density [9].
• pH Control: Maintain pH at 7.0 using CO₂ addition or buffer systems as needed [9].
• Growth Conditions: Provide continuous illumination (150-200 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ PAR) and temperature control (22-25°C).

Experimental Application in Growth Studies

• Culture Dilution: Prepare microalgae suspensions at varying cell densities (e.g., 10⁵, 2×10⁶, and 2×10⁷ cells mL⁻¹) corresponding to specific fresh weight concentrations (0.00775, 0.0775, and 0.775 g L⁻¹) [9].
• Application Rate: Apply 140 mL of microalgae suspension per plant to growth substrate in soilless cultivation systems [9].
• Control Setup: Include control groups receiving no microalgae application for comparison.
• Monitoring Parameters: Track growth metrics (optical density, dry weight), gas exchange (CO₂ uptake, O₂ evolution via gas chromatography), and nutritional composition.

Diagram: Experimental Workflow for BLSS Microalgae Research

The following diagram outlines a standardized experimental workflow for evaluating microalgae in BLSS applications:

Diagram 2: Experimental workflow for evaluating microalgae in BLSS applications, from strain selection through data analysis.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Microorganism Research

Reagent/Material	Specification/Example	Function in Research	BLSS Relevance
Basal Growth Medium	Erddekokt + Salze (ES) medium: Macronutrients + soil extract + micronutrient solution [9]	Provides essential nutrients for microalgae growth	Optimizes biomass production with minimal resources
pH Control System	CO₂ addition or buffer systems to maintain pH 7.0 [9]	Maintains optimal growth conditions	Mimics BLSS gas exchange processes
Photobioreactor	Channel-type ponds (1-ton capacity); Microfluidic bioreactors [9] [10]	Controlled cultivation environment	Space-efficient design for microgravity
Analytical Instruments	Gas chromatograph, spectrophotometer, mass spectrometer [11]	Monitors growth, gas exchange, and metabolites	Ensures system balance and crew safety
Sterilization Equipment	Autoclave, 0.22 μm filters	Maintains axenic cultures	Prevents contamination in closed systems
Wastewater Substrate	Synthetic or actual human-derived wastewater [5]	Tests resource recycling capability	Demonstrates closed-loop functionality
Lighting System	LED arrays (adjustable spectrum and intensity)	Provides photosynthetic energy	Enables optimization of growth conditions

Challenges and Future Research Directions

Despite significant progress, several challenges remain before photosynthetic microorganisms can be fully integrated into operational BLSS for long-duration space missions:

• Microgravity Effects: Gas-liquid transfer phenomena differ under microgravity, inevitably affecting cultivation processes and oxygen production [7]. Long-term studies under actual space conditions are still needed [5].
• Contamination Control: Microbiological monitoring aboard the ISS has identified various pathogens with antibiotic resistance genes, highlighting the need for robust containment and monitoring systems [12] [11].
• Strain Optimization: Synthetic biology approaches can enhance cyanobacterial and microalgal strains for improved photosynthesis efficiency, nutritional value, and stress tolerance [8].
• System Integration: Future work must focus on integrating microalgal components with other BLSS compartments (higher plants, waste processors) in ground-based demonstrators before space deployment [6].

The path forward requires continued collaboration between space agencies, academic researchers, and commercial partners to address these challenges through targeted research and technology development.

The establishment of sustainable life-support systems is a fundamental challenge for long-duration space missions. Biological air revitalization, which uses photosynthetic organisms to convert astronaut-respired CO2 back into breathable oxygen and edible biomass, presents a闭环 (closed-loop) solution. This process, central to Bio-Regenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS), leverages the natural reactions of photosynthesis but requires optimization for the unique constraints of the space environment, including microgravity, limited volume, and resource scarcity [13] [14]. Microbial systems, particularly cyanobacteria and microalgae, are of significant interest due to their high metabolic rates, minimal cultivation footprint, and resilience, making them potent candidates for these systems [15]. This whitepaper provides an in-depth technical guide to the core processes, contemporary research, and experimental methodologies for utilizing microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization in space research.

Fundamental Biological Processes

The Photosynthetic Mechanism

At its core, biological air revitalization is driven by photosynthesis, a process that converts light energy into chemical energy, simultaneously consuming carbon dioxide and producing oxygen. The general equation is:

6CO₂ + 6H₂O + Light Energy → C₆H₁₂O₆ (sugar) + 6O₂

This process involves two interconnected stages: the light-dependent reactions and the carbon-fixing reactions [16].

• Light-Dependent Reactions: These reactions occur in specialized membrane systems. Light energy is captured by antenna complexes (e.g., chlorophylls and carotenoids) and transferred to reaction centers with near-perfect quantum efficiency. This energy drives the photolysis of water, a reaction catalyzed by the Photosystem II (PSII) supercomplex, which splits water molecules into protons, electrons, and molecular oxygen [16] [17]. The electrons are then used to generate energy-rich molecules ATP and NADPH.
• Carbon-Fixing Reactions (Calvin-Benson-Bassham Cycle): The ATP and NADPH produced in the light reactions power the Calvin cycle, which fixes inorganic CO2 into organic sugars. The key enzyme in this cycle is Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). Rubisco catalyzes the carboxylation of ribulose bisphosphate with CO2, initiating the pathway that ultimately produces carbohydrates for biomass growth [18] [19]. A major inefficiency arises because Rubisco can also react with oxygen in a process called photorespiration, which wastes energy and releases previously fixed CO2 [18] [20].

Key Process Metrics and Efficiencies

The efficiency of converting solar energy into biomass is theoretically limited by a series of energy losses. The following table summarizes the theoretical efficiency limits for photosynthetic conversion in C3 and C4 plants, which provides a benchmark for evaluating and improving microbial systems [20].

Table 1: Theoretical Efficiency of Photosynthetic Energy Conversion

Process Stage	Energy Loss Factor	C3 Plants Efficiency	C4 Plants Efficiency
Light Interception	Non-absorbed wavelengths (e.g., near-infrared)	50.0% loss	50.0% loss
Light Absorption	Reflection & transmission of PAR	5.0% loss	5.0% loss
Quantum Yield	Photochemical inefficiency	8.0% loss	8.0% loss
Carbon Fixation	Limitations of the Calvin cycle	66.0% loss	71.0% loss
Photorespiration	Rubisco oxygenase activity	3.5% loss	0.0% loss
Dark Respiration	Metabolic maintenance costs	3.4% loss	4.0% loss
Theoretical Maximum Efficiency		5.1%	6.0%

In practice, average conversion efficiencies in field conditions are even lower, typically only 1-3.5% [20]. For space applications, where every input is precious, bridging the gap between these practical efficiencies and theoretical maxima is a primary research goal. Microbial biofilms, for instance, have been shown to have an active photosynthetic region approximately 75 µm thick, which dictates the optimal design for photobioreactors to maximize light penetration and gas exchange [15].

Recent Technological Advances and Research

Enhancing Photosynthetic Efficiency

Recent research has focused on overcoming the inherent inefficiencies of photosynthesis through bioengineering.

• Improving Rubisco Catalysis: Scientists at MIT have used a directed evolution technique called MutaT7 to enhance a bacterial version of Rubisco. By mutating the enzyme in E. coli under atmospheric oxygen pressure, they identified mutations that increased Rubisco's catalytic efficiency by up to 25%. These mutations, located near the enzyme's active site, improved its discrimination against oxygen, thereby reducing energy-wasting photorespiration [18].
• Optimizing Light Energy Flow: Studies on the Photosystem II (PSII) supercomplex have revealed a sophisticated energy management system. Unlike a simple funnel, PSII features a "flat energy landscape" that allows exciton energy to wander and explore multiple paths before committing to charge separation. This design allows the system to both maximize light harvesting and implement photoprotection, preventing damage from sudden light intensity spikes. Engineering such dynamic regulation into microbial systems could significantly boost their robustness and productivity in the variable light conditions of a spacecraft [17].
• Engineering Carbon Concentrating Mechanisms (CCMs): Introducing CCMs from cyanobacteria into C3 plants is a major strategy to enhance carbon fixation. These mechanisms locally elevate CO2 concentration around Rubisco, thereby suppressing photorespiration. Research is ongoing to introduce components like bicarbonate transporters and bacterial carboxysomes into plant chloroplasts to achieve this effect [19].

Microbial Systems for Carbon Capture and Conversion

Specialized microbial systems offer a direct route for air revitalization. Stanford researchers have developed a microbial-driven system for atmospheric CO2 conversion. This technology uses anaerobic microbes that can metabolize dilute atmospheric CO2 (as low as indoor air) in moderately alkaline solutions at ambient temperatures, converting it into reduced organic compounds. This proof-of-concept system has demonstrated CO2 drawdown below atmospheric levels, indicating its potential for large-scale carbon sequestration and biomass production within a closed environment [21].

Table 2: Microbial vs. Plant-Based Systems for Space Applications

Feature	Microbial Systems (Cyanobacteria/Microalgae)	Plant-Based Systems (Crops)
Productivity	High metabolic rate; potentially higher biomass yield per unit area [15]	Lower growth rate and biomass yield per unit volume
Cultivation Footprint	Compact; suitable for biofilm reactors in confined spaces [15]	Requires larger growth chambers for canopy development
Environmental Tolerance	Generally high resilience to environmental stresses	More sensitive to environmental fluctuations
Resource Use	Efficient in water and nutrient utilization	Higher water and nutrient demands
Harvesting	Can be complex due to small cell size and culture density [15]	Logistically simpler for larger food items
Nutritional Output	Source of proteins, lipids, and antioxidants	Directly produces familiar food crops
O2 Production / CO2 Capture	Highly efficient per unit volume	Efficient per unit area, but requires more space

Experimental Protocols for Key Analyses

Directed Evolution of Rubisco

This protocol outlines the MutaT7 method for evolving improved Rubisco variants in a bacterial host [18].

• Objective: To generate and select for mutant Rubisco enzymes with enhanced catalytic efficiency and reduced oxygenase activity.
• Materials:
  • Plasmid containing the gene for a fast, natural Rubisco (e.g., from Gallionellaceae bacteria).
  • E. coli host strain engineered for MutaT7 continuous evolution.
  • MutaT7 mutagenesis system (requires expression of T7 RNA polymerase fused to a mutator domain).
  • Selective growth media where bacterial growth rate is coupled to Rubisco activity.
  • Anaerobic chambers and ambient oxygen incubators for selection pressure.
• Procedure:
  • Transformation: Introduce the Rubisco-encoding plasmid into the MutaT7 E. coli host strain.
  • Continuous Mutagenesis & Selection: Culture the transformed bacteria for multiple rounds (e.g., 6 rounds) in liquid medium under ambient oxygen levels. The MutaT7 system will continuously introduce random mutations into the Rubisco gene during cell division.
  • Screening: Plate cultures periodically on solid selective media. The design of the selection system ensures that only cells expressing functional, efficient Rubisco variants will form colonies.
  • Isolation and Sequencing: Isolate plasmids from fast-growing colonies and sequence the Rubisco gene to identify beneficial mutations.
  • Biochemical Validation: Purify the mutant Rubisco enzymes and kinetically characterize them in vitro to quantify improvements in carboxylation rate (kcat) and specificity for CO2 over O2 (Sc/o).

Directed Evolution Workflow for Rubisco Improvement

Modeling Photosynthetic Biofilm Productivity

This protocol details the development of a 2D spatial model to simulate and optimize the growth of a microalgae biofilm for use in a BLSS [15].

• Objective: To create a predictive model of microalgae biofilm development that informs optimal harvesting strategies and reactor design.
• Materials:
  • Computational environment with PDE (Partial Differential Equation) solver (e.g., COMSOL, or custom code in MATLAB/Python).
  • Experimentally derived kinetic parameters for microbial growth, photosynthesis, respiration, and EPS excretion.
• Model Components and Procedure:
  • Define Constituents: The model treats the biofilm as a multi-phasic system with four solid constituents: Functional Biomass (N), Carbon Storage (A), Extracellular Matrix (E), and the Liquid phase (L). Key dissolved components are Inorganic Carbon (C), Oxygen (O), and Nitrate (S).
  • Formulate Kinetic Rates: Define the rate laws for critical processes as functions of intracellular stores and dissolved compounds:
    • Photosynthesis (φPhot): Modeled using the Peeters-Eilers model, which accounts for light saturation and photoinhibition. It is regulated by light intensity and inorganic carbon availability.
    • Respiration (φResp): A rate consuming stored carbon and O2, producing CO2.
    • Functional Biomass Synthesis (φFunc): Triggered when nitrogen is available.
    • EPS Excretion (φExcr): Activated under conditions of nitrogen limitation.
    • Mortality (φDeath): Modeled to increase at very low or very high O2 concentrations.
  • Implement Mass Conservation: Use mixture theory to formulate PDEs that describe the mass balance for each constituent, accounting for biological reactions and physical transport.
  • Simulate and Validate: Run 1D and 2D simulations to predict biofilm structural dynamics over time. Validate the model output against experimental data for biofilm thickness, composition, and productivity.
  • Optimize Harvesting: Use the validated model to test different harvesting frequencies and patterns (e.g., partial vs. full removal) to determine the strategy that maximizes the yield of desired products (e.g., algal biomass vs. total biofilm).

Key Metabolic Fluxes in a Photosynthetic Biofilm Model

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Microbial Photosynthesis Research

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Technical Notes
MutaT7 Continuous Evolution System	Enables rapid in vivo mutagenesis and selection of target genes like rubisco in E. coli [18].	Faster and more comprehensive than error-prone PCR; allows for multiple rounds of evolution without manual intervention.
CID Bio-Science CI-340 Photosynthesis System	Handheld infrared gas analyzer for measuring photosynthetic rate (CO2 uptake) and chlorophyll fluorescence in real-time [20].	Critical for validating the physiological impact of genetic modifications in whole organisms or biofilms.
2D Electronic-Vibrational Spectroscopy	Advanced spectroscopic technique for tracking exciton energy flow through light-harvesting complexes with high resolution [17].	Provides unprecedented detail on energy transfer dynamics, essential for understanding efficiency in systems like PSII.
Peeters-Eilers Model Parameters	Mathematical framework for modeling the photosynthesis rate as a function of light intensity, including photoinhibition [15].	Essential for accurately simulating microbial growth in computational models of biofilm productivity.
Gallionellaceae Rubisco Homolog	A naturally efficient and fast bacterial Rubisco used as a starting template for protein engineering efforts [18].	Provides a superior foundation for directed evolution compared to slower plant-based Rubiscos.
Microalgal Biofilm Reactor Systems	Cultivation systems (e.g., rotating algal disks, conveyer belts) for growing microalgae as biofilms instead of suspensions [15].	Dramatically reduces the energy cost associated with mixing and harvesting biomass in a BLSS.

Application in Space Research and Agriculture

The integration of these biological processes into functional systems is key to the future of human space exploration.

• Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS): Plants and microbes are central components of BLSS, which aim to regenerate air, water, and food by recycling waste products. Plants contribute to oxygen production, CO2 removal, and food supply, while also providing psychological benefits for astronauts [13] [14]. Microbial photobioreactors can act as a more compact and efficient first stage for air revitalization.
• Challenges of Microgravity: Plant growth and development are profoundly influenced by gravity. Gravity sensing in plants involves the sedimentation of starch-filled plastids (statoliths) within specialized cells, which triggers a signal transduction pathway involving the polar redistribution of the auxin hormone, leading to gravitropic bending [13]. In microgravity, this sensing mechanism is disrupted, which can affect plant architecture and nutrient uptake. Research on the International Space Station (ISS) is focused on understanding these molecular and physiological responses to develop gravity-compensation strategies or select space-adapted cultivars [13] [14].
• Space Agriculture Systems: Future space agriculture will rely on controlled environment agriculture chambers. Research is directed toward selecting and breeding plant varieties with high harvest index, dwarf architecture, and enhanced photosynthetic efficiency that are suitable for growth in confined spaces and under altered gravity conditions [14]. Optimizing factors such as canopy structure to improve light distribution is also a critical area of development [19].

The biological conversion of CO2 to oxygen and biomass is more than a fundamental ecological process; it is a critical enabling technology for humanity's future in space. While natural photosynthesis provides the blueprint, it is clear that significant bioengineering is required to achieve the efficiency, robustness, and compactness required for a space-bound BLSS. Recent breakthroughs in enhancing Rubisco, understanding and modeling the sophisticated energy management of photosystems, and developing novel microbial capture systems provide a strong foundation. The path forward requires an integrated approach, combining synthetic biology, advanced materials science, and precision agriculture to co-optimize microbial and plant-based systems. Success in this endeavor will not only sustain life beyond Earth but also yield transformative insights for addressing climate and food security challenges on our home planet.

The challenge of sustaining human life in the closed environment of space has driven the development of increasingly sophisticated Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS). These systems have evolved from early ground-based demonstrators to advanced international research initiatives aimed at achieving full environmental control and resource recycling. This progression represents a fundamental shift from merely supplying consumables from Earth to creating self-sustaining ecosystems that can regenerate air, water, and food through biological processes. The historical journey from the Soviet BIOS projects to the contemporary European-led MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) initiative illustrates a growing understanding of integrating biological components with engineering precision to support long-duration space missions beyond low Earth orbit.

This evolution is particularly critical for the future of space exploration, as resupplying resources from Earth becomes increasingly infeasible for missions to the Moon and Mars. The core thesis of this development centers on harnessing microbial photosynthesis and plant-based systems for air revitalization—the continuous process of removing carbon dioxide and replenishing oxygen within crewed spacecraft and habitats. By examining this historical context, researchers can better understand the current state of BLSS technology and identify future research directions necessary for achieving the autonomy required for sustainable human presence in space.

Historical Foundations: Early BLSS Ground Demonstrators

The conceptual foundation for BLSS was established in the 1960s with the creation of several ground-based test facilities that simulated closed ecological systems. These early projects demonstrated the feasibility of using biological processes to support human life in sealed environments and provided valuable data for future system development.

• Soviet BIOS Projects: The Russian BIOS (Biological Life Support System) projects were among the first to test closed ecological systems. The BIOS-3 facility, located in Krasnoyarsk, Siberia, was an underground closed system of phytotrons that included a crew area and an entirely enclosed greenhouse. This system successfully grew wheat and vegetables while using algae cultivators for air revitalization, establishing the fundamental principle of connecting human habitation with food production and air regeneration within a sealed environment [6].

• Biosphere 2: This American project in Arizona represented one of the most ambitious attempts to create a closed ecological system. Between 1991 and 1993, eight crew members lived sealed inside the 3.15-acre structure that contained multiple biomes including agricultural areas. While encountering challenges with oxygen and food production, Biosphere 2 provided invaluable data on the complexities of managing closed ecosystems and highlighted the critical role of microbial communities in nutrient cycling [6].

• Other Significant Facilities: Additional ground demonstrators included Japan's Closed Ecology Experiment Facility (CEEF), China's Lunar Palace 1, and NASA's Lunar-Mars Life Support System Test Project which successfully supported a crew of four for 91 days using a growth chamber for air revitalization and food production [6]. These facilities collectively advanced the understanding of how to integrate biological components into life support systems and identified key challenges in system stability and control.

Table 1: Major Ground-Based BLSS Demonstrators

Facility Name	Location	Key Biological Components	Duration/Crew	Primary Achievements
BIOS-3	Krasnoyarsk, Russia	Wheat, vegetables, algae	N/A	Established fundamental principles of closed ecosystems [6]
Biosphere 2	Arizona, USA	Multiple biomes, agricultural areas	2 years (8 crew)	Demonstrated complexity of managing closed ecosystems [6]
CEEF	Japan	Plants, microbes	N/A	Advanced integration of biological components [6]
Lunar Palace 1	China	Plants, microbes	N/A	Tested closed-loop BLSS with humans [6]
NASA LMLSTP	USA	Plant growth chamber	91 days (4 crew)	Contributed to air revitalization and food requirements [6]

The MELiSSA Initiative: Structure and Compartmentalized Approach

The Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) represents the current state-of-the-art in BLSS research and development. Initiated by the European Space Agency (ESA), MELiSSA is an international collaborative effort involving 15 primary partners and over 40 organizations from 13 countries [22] [23]. The project's primary objective is to achieve a closed-loop regenerative life support system capable of producing food, recovering water, and regenerating atmosphere through biological processes while simultaneously recycling wastes (CO₂ and organic wastes) using light as an energy source [23].

Unlike earlier approaches that treated BLSS as a single integrated system, MELiSSA employs a compartmentalized architecture where specific biological processes are isolated and optimized in separate units. This modular approach allows for precise control of each biological process and enables targeted troubleshooting and optimization. The MELiSSA loop consists of several interconnected compartments, each colonized with specific bacteria or higher plants according to its designated function [23]:

• Waste Degradation Compartment: Breakdown of organic solid and liquid wastes from crew activities
• Nitrification Compartment: Conversion of ammonia to nitrates for plant nutrition
• Air Revitalization Compartment: Photosynthesis using micro-algae for oxygen production and CO₂ removal
• Food Production Compartment: Photosynthesis with higher plants for food generation
• Mock Crew Compartment: Currently using rat isolators as a preparation phase for future human-rated facilities

The MELiSSA Pilot Plant (MPP) at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona serves as ESA's primary external laboratory for system demonstration and refinement [23]. For cost and safety considerations, the current system uses a mock-up crew of rats rather than humans, representing a preparation phase for future human-rated facilities. The operational challenge of the MELiSSA consortium has been to demonstrate that this integrated system is feasible, reliable, and efficient enough to support human life during long-duration space missions [23].

Diagram 1: The MELiSSA Loop Compartmentalized Architecture showing the interconnections between biological processes for resource recovery and revitalization.

Microbial Photosynthesis for Air Revitalization: Core Mechanisms

At the heart of BLSS air revitalization capabilities lies the process of microbial photosynthesis, which utilizes photosynthetic microorganisms to consume carbon dioxide and produce oxygen through light-driven metabolic pathways. This approach offers several advantages over traditional physicochemical systems, including continuous regeneration, production of edible biomass, and simultaneous water processing capabilities.

Key Photosynthetic Microorganisms

The selection of appropriate photosynthetic microorganisms is critical for efficient air revitalization in BLSS. The cyanobacterium Limnospira indica (previously known as Arthrospira or Spirulina) has emerged as a particularly promising candidate for space applications due to its high photosynthetic efficiency, oxygen production rate, and nutritional value [24]. Research conducted through the ARTHROSPIRA-B and -C experiments onboard the International Space Station (ISS) has demonstrated the feasibility of oxygen and biomass production by L. indica in microgravity conditions, using small prototype photobioreactors to investigate the influence of space flight on growth, oxygen production, and molecular composition [24].

Other microorganisms being investigated include Chlorella vulgaris and various strains of cyanobacteria capable of maintaining photosynthetic activity under the unique environmental conditions of space, including microgravity, increased ionizing radiation, and different atmospheric compositions [6] [25]. These organisms must not only exhibit high photosynthetic rates but also robustness to withstand the stresses of space environments and storage conditions before activation.

Physiological Mechanisms of Gas Exchange

Microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization relies on the fundamental physiological processes of photosynthesis and respiration. Photosynthetic microorganisms contain light-harvesting pigments (chlorophyll, phycocyanin, allophycocyanin) that capture light energy and drive the photolysis of water, resulting in oxygen evolution and carbon dioxide fixation into biomass [24]. The specific mechanisms involve:

• Light Absorption: Pigment systems capture photons and transfer energy to reaction centers
• Electron Transport Chain: Generation of reducing power (NADPH) and proton gradient for ATP synthesis
• Carbon Fixation: Calvin cycle enzymes incorporate CO₂ into organic compounds
• Oxygen Evolution: Water molecules are split at the oxygen-evolving complex

The efficiency of these processes is highly dependent on environmental factors including light intensity and quality, temperature, nutrient availability, and culture density. Research has shown that storage conditions before activation can significantly impact photosynthetic performance, with parameters such as initial cell concentration, medium pH, and nutrient availability during storage strongly influencing post-storage viability and function [24].

Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Photosynthesis Performance

Rigorous testing of photosynthetic microorganisms under simulated space conditions has generated substantial quantitative data on their performance for air revitalization applications. The analysis of this data is essential for optimizing system parameters and predicting operational stability during space missions.

Storage Condition Impact on Photosynthetic Efficiency

A critical aspect of using photosynthetic microorganisms in space missions involves the storage and transport phase before activation, which can last from one to several weeks. During this period, the microorganisms must remain dormant yet viable for rapid activation upon arrival. Studies have examined the effects of dormancy in dark and cold conditions on L. indica's photosynthetic performance and biomass composition after storage [24].

Table 2: Impact of Storage Duration on Limnospira indica Viability and Photosynthetic Function

Parameter	Pre-Storage Baseline	After 7 Days Storage	After 14 Days Storage	Measurement Significance
FL3-H/FL4-H Ratio	0.32 ± 0.01	0.58 ± 0.05	2.30 ± 0.01	Indicator of photosynthetic pigment integrity [24]
Percentage of P1 Cells (%)	~5% (estimated)	~2% (estimated)	0.27% ± 0.01%	Fraction of long, highly pigmented cells with high photosynthetic capacity [24]
Phycocyanin/Chlorophyll Ratio	Baseline	Moderate decrease	Significant decrease	Marker of light-harvesting apparatus integrity [24]
Optical Density (OD770nm)	Baseline	Moderate decrease	Significant decrease	Indicator of biomass concentration and cell lysis [24]
Dry Weight	Baseline	Minimal change	Significant decrease	Evidence of cell lysis and debris formation [24]

Research findings indicate that storage duration significantly affects post-storage photosynthetic function, with 14-day storage having a much stronger negative impact than 7-day storage. The optimal storage conditions identified include lower cell concentrations and appropriate medium pH, which positively influence storage outcomes [24]. Storage was also tested under simulated microgravity conditions, with no adverse effects observed when healthy cultures were used, supporting the feasibility of space applications [24].

Comparison of Air Revitalization Technologies

The development of air revitalization technologies has progressed along multiple parallel paths, including biological systems based on microbial photosynthesis and physicochemical alternatives. Understanding the relative advantages and limitations of each approach is essential for designing integrated life support systems.

Table 3: Comparison of Air Revitalization Technologies for Space Applications

Technology Type	Key Mechanisms	Oxygen Production Rate	CO₂ Removal Efficiency	Secondary Benefits	Limitations
Microbial Photosynthesis (L. indica)	Biological photosynthesis using cyanobacteria	Varies with culture health, density, and light availability	Direct correlation with O₂ production	Edible biomass production, water processing	Requires reactivation after storage, sensitivity to environmental factors [24]
Higher Plant Cultivation	Plant photosynthesis in controlled environments	Species-dependent, requires significant growth time	Species-dependent, requires significant growth time	Direct food production, psychological benefits	Large space/volume requirements, long growth cycles [6]
Sorbent-Based Systems (NASA SBAR)	Vacuum swing adsorption using composite silica gel/zeolite beds	N/A (non-biological)	High efficiency in controlled conditions	Lightweight, regenerable, reconfigurable	No food production, dependent on consumable materials [26]
Liquid Sorbent Systems (NASA)	Chemical absorption using liquid sorbents in microchannel contactors	N/A (non-biological)	4x capacity compared to solid zeolites	Low regeneration temperature, fewer mechanical parts	No food production, chemical handling requirements [26]

Experimental Protocols for Microbial Photosynthesis Research

Advancing microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization requires standardized experimental methodologies that enable reproducible research across different facilities and conditions. The following protocols represent current best practices in the field.

Storage and Reactivation Assessment Protocol

This procedure evaluates the viability and functional preservation of photosynthetic microorganisms after extended storage under space-relevant conditions, mirroring the upload and transport phase before activation in space [24].

• Objective: To quantify the impact of storage duration and conditions on post-storage photosynthetic function and growth capacity

• Materials Required:

  • Axenic cultures of target microorganisms (e.g., Limnospira indica)
  • Appropriate growth medium (e.g., Zarrouk's medium for Limnospira)
  • Temperature-controlled storage facilities (±0.5°C accuracy)
  • Light source with controllable intensity (45-80 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹)
  • Photobioreactors or tissue culture flasks
  • Spectrophotometer for optical density measurements
  • Flow cytometer with appropriate fluorescent filters
  • Materials for dry weight determination

• Procedure:

  • Prepare cultures at specified initial cell concentrations (OD770nm typically 1.5-2.0)
  • Adjust medium pH to optimal range (approximately 10.8 for Limnospira)
  • Transfer cultures to storage conditions: static, dark, 4°C, without gas phase
  • Maintain storage for predetermined durations (7, 14, 21 days)
  • After storage, inoculate into fresh medium at standard cultivation temperature (33°C for Limnospira)
  • Illuminate with controlled light intensity (45 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ initially)
  • Monitor daily growth parameters: OD770nm, pH, pigment content
  • Assess photosynthetic efficiency through flow cytometry (FL3-H/FL4-H ratio, %P1 cells)
  • Determine biomass productivity and maximum growth rate (μmax) during reactivation phase

• Data Analysis:

  • Compare pre-storage and post-storage parameters using paired statistical tests
  • Calculate specific growth rates during reactivation phase
  • Correlate storage conditions with reactivation efficiency
  • Establish thresholds for acceptable storage duration and conditions

Photosynthetic Performance Under Modified Atmosphere Protocol

This protocol evaluates the photosynthetic oxygen production and carbon dioxide consumption rates of microorganisms under different atmospheric compositions, including space cabin environments that may have elevated CO₂ concentrations [6] [25].

• Objective: To quantify gas exchange rates of photosynthetic microorganisms under simulated spacecraft atmosphere conditions

• Materials Required:

  • Closed photobioreactor system with gas tight seals
  • Gas mixing system for precise atmospheric control
  • CO₂ and O₂ sensors with data logging capability
  • LED illumination system with adjustable spectra and intensity
  • Temperature control system
  • Sampling ports for culture analysis

• Procedure:

  • Inoculate photobioreactor with standardized culture density
  • Establish baseline atmosphere (e.g., 0.04% CO₂ in air)
  • Seal system and initiate continuous monitoring of O₂ and CO₂ concentrations
  • Maintain constant light intensity appropriate for species (e.g., 45-80 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹)
  • Record gas concentration changes at 5-minute intervals for 24-72 hours
  • Repeat with modified atmospheres (e.g., 0.5%, 1%, 2% CO₂)
  • Collect culture samples at beginning and end for biomass and pigment analysis
  • Calculate net and gross photosynthetic rates from gas exchange data

• Data Analysis:

  • Determine maximum photosynthetic rates under different CO₂ concentrations
  • Calculate light utilization efficiency
  • Model oxygen production capacity per unit biomass
  • Establish relationships between culture density and gas exchange rates

Diagram 2: Experimental workflow for assessing storage impact on photosynthetic microorganisms, showing key parameters tested at each phase.

Research Reagent Solutions for Microbial Photosynthesis Studies

Conducting rigorous research on microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization requires specific reagents and materials standardized across the field to ensure comparable and reproducible results.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for Microbial Photosynthesis Studies

Reagent/Material	Specification	Primary Function	Application Notes
Zarrouk's Medium	Standardized composition for cyanobacteria	Optimal growth medium for Limnospira species	May require modification for specific storage or stress conditions [24]
Carbon Dioxide Gas Mixes	Pre-mixed concentrations (0.04%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%) in air	Atmospheric simulation for photosynthetic gas exchange studies	Requires precision gas mixing equipment for accurate concentrations [6]
Phosphate Buffers	Various pH ranges (6.0-8.0)	Biomass processing and analytical procedures	pH stability critical for pigment preservation during analysis [24]
Fluorescent Dyes (Flow Cytometry)	Specific chlorophyll and phycocyanin fluorophores	Cell viability and photosynthetic pigment assessment	Laser compatibility must match instrument specifications [24]
Membrane Filters	0.22μm or 0.45μm pore size	Biomass separation for dry weight determination	Pre-weighing required for gravimetric analysis [24]
Neutral Red	Redox indicator dye	Mediated electron transfer studies in bioelectrochemical systems	Can enhance electron transfer in microbial fuel cells [27]
Artificial Seawater Base	Standardized salt composition	Marine photosynthetic microorganisms cultivation	Ionic composition affects photosynthetic efficiency [24]

Current Challenges and Future Research Directions

Despite significant advancements in BLSS technology, several technical challenges remain to be addressed before fully functional microbial photosynthesis systems can be deployed for long-duration space missions.

Technical Limitations and Mitigation Strategies

• Storage Viability Loss: Photosynthetic microorganisms experience decreased viability and function after extended storage periods. Research shows 14-day storage causes significant deterioration of photosynthetic pigments and biomass integrity [24]. Mitigation approaches include optimizing initial cell concentration, medium pH, and nutrient composition before storage to enhance post-storage recovery.

• System Integration Complexity: Incorporating biological systems into spacecraft environments presents challenges in volume, mass, and control system requirements. Future designs must focus on miniaturization and automation to reduce crew intervention and improve reliability [6] [23].

• Microgravity Effects: While simulated microgravity shows no adverse effects on healthy cultures of L. indica [24], the long-term impact of reduced gravity on microbial community dynamics and metabolic functions requires further investigation through space-based experiments.

Promising Research Frontiers

• Genetic Engineering of Photosynthetic Microorganisms: Targeted genetic modification could enhance photosynthetic efficiency, stress resistance, and product formation. Research is exploring engineering cyanobacteria for improved oxygen production, radiation resistance, and nutritional value [25].

• Hybrid Biological-Physicochemical Systems: Integrating microbial photosynthesis with physicochemical systems like NASA's Sorbent-Based Air Revitalization (SBAR) could provide redundant, complementary capabilities for air revitalization [26].

• In-Situ Resource Utilization: Incorporating local resources such as lunar or Martian regolith for microbial cultivation could reduce dependence on Earth-supplied materials. Research demonstrates the potential of using nitrogen-fixing bacteria to enhance regolith fertility for plant growth [25].

• Bioelectrochemical Systems: Microbial fuel cells and related technologies show promise for simultaneous electricity generation, waste processing, and environmental monitoring. Recent advances in 3D-printed MFC biosensors demonstrate potential for nitrate detection in water recycling systems [28] [27].

The progression from early Soviet BIOS projects to the current MELiSSA initiative demonstrates the evolving understanding of biological systems for space life support. As research continues to address existing challenges, microbial photosynthesis promises to play an increasingly central role in achieving the air revitalization capabilities necessary for sustainable human exploration beyond Earth orbit.

The development of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) is a critical prerequisite for sustainable, long-duration human space exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit. These systems are essential for achieving a closed-loop environment, revitalizing air by converting astronaut-respired carbon dioxide into oxygen, a process central to a broader thesis on microbial photosynthesis in space research [3]. Among the most promising biological agents for this function are photosynthetic microorganisms, due to their high metabolic efficiency and multifunctional potential. This whitepaper provides a comparative technical analysis of three leading candidate species: the cyanobacterium Limnospira, the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris, and a consortium of Antarctic Chlorophyta. We evaluate their physiological performance, operational resilience, and technological readiness for integration into spacecraft environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS).

Species Characteristics and Performance Metrics

The candidate species originate from diverse environments, resulting in distinct physiological attributes and performance capabilities relevant to space missions.

Table 1: Comparative Species Characteristics and Performance Data

Parameter	Limnospira indica	Chlorella vulgaris	Antarctic Chlorophyta
Organism Type	Filamentous Cyanobacterium [29]	Green Microalga (Eukaryote) [30]	Eukaryotic Microalgae Consortium [30]
Origin/Environment	Alkaline Lakes [29]	Temperate Freshwater [30]	McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica [30]
Key Function(s)	O₂ Production, Food, Waste Remediation [24] [3]	O₂ Production, Food, Thermal Control [30] [31]	O₂ Production, Thermal Control [30]
Reported O₂ Production Rate	Data from space experiments (ARTHROSPIRA) [24]	3.15 mg O₂ L⁻¹ (final, cycled temp) [30]	1.03 mg O₂ L⁻¹ (final, cycled temp) [30]
Temperature Tolerance	Optimal ~33°C [24]	9-27°C (Cycled); 5°C (sustained) [30]	4-14°C (Cycled) [30]
Resilience to Dynamic Temperatures	N/A	High (acclimates to 28-min cycles) [30]	Very High (native to fluctuating temps) [30]
Storage Resilience	2 weeks at 4°C in dark, liquid [24]	Robust long-term cultivation shown [31]	Desiccated/cryopreserved over winter [30]
Effect of Microgravity	Growth rate reduced in simulated μG [32]	Planned for ISS testing [31]	Data required

Diagram 1: Logical workflow for evaluating candidate species in space research context.

Detailed Experimental Protocols

To generate comparable data across studies, standardized protocols for assessing physiological performance are essential. The following methodologies are commonly employed in the field.

Protocol for Testing Temperature Cycle Resilience

This protocol is designed to simulate the dynamic thermal environment of a spacecraft thermal control loop [30].

• Culture Setup: Inoculate the candidate species in its appropriate liquid medium within a photobioreactor equipped with precise temperature control.
• Temperature Profiling: Expose the culture to repeated, short-duration temperature cycles.
  • For C. vulgaris, apply a 28-minute cycle oscillating between 9°C and 27°C [30].
  • For Antarctic Chlorophyta, apply a 28-minute cycle oscillating between 4°C and 14°C [30].
  • Maintain a constant 10°C control condition for baseline comparison [30].
• Monitoring and Analysis:
  • Oxygen Production: Periodically measure the oxygen concentration in the culture medium (e.g., in mg O₂ L⁻¹) throughout the experiment [30].
  • Growth Metrics: Track culture density using optical density (OD) measurements (e.g., OD680 for Chlorella [33], OD770 for Limnospira [24] [32]) and cell counts [34].
  • Physiological Stress: Assess photosystem II health using chlorophyll fluorometry to determine the Fv/Fm ratio [30].

Protocol for Simulated Microgravity Effects

Ground-based analogs like the Random Positioning Machine are used to probe the effects of reduced gravity [32].

• Hardware Configuration:
  • Place cultures in gas-permeable cell culture bags.
  • Mount bags in custom holders on an RPM, which continuously randomizes orientation to the gravity vector, creating a simulated microgravity (sim-μG) environment [32].
  • Use a Rotating Cell Culture System (RCCS), which rotates perpendicular to gravity, as a 1G control [32].
• Culture Conditions: Maintain cultures under continuous illumination relevant to the species (e.g., ~45 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ for Limnospira [24]) and optimal temperature.
• Post-Experiment Analysis:
  • Growth Kinetics: Calculate maximum growth rate (μmax) and doubling time from OD data [32].
  • Proteomics: Perform label-free liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) on samples to identify proteins that are upregulated or downregulated in sim-μG compared to control [32].
  • Cell Morphology: Analyze filament length (for Limnospira) via microscopy and sedimentation rates [32].

Protocol for Storage and Revival

Evaluating dormancy and revival success is critical for launch scenarios where active power is unavailable [24].

• Storage Conditions: Transfer cultures to a liquid suspension without a gas phase. Store statically in the dark at 4°C for durations of 1 to 2 weeks [24].
• Viability Assessment: Post-storage, analyze cell concentration, dry weight, and pigment content (e.g., phycocyanin, chlorophyll) to quantify degradation [24].
• Revival Phase: Inoculate stored cultures into fresh medium under standard growth conditions (e.g., 33°C, light). Monitor the time to resume exponential growth and final biomass productivity [24].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Essential Research Materials for Space Microbiology Studies

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Example Use Case
Zarrouk's Medium	Standard culture medium for Limnospira spp. [24]	Used as replenishment medium in storage and revival experiments [24].
BG-11 Medium	Standard culture medium for Chlorella vulgaris and other cyanobacteria [33]	Serves as the basal medium for growth optimization studies [33].
Gas-Permeable Cell Culture Bags	Cultivation vessel for experiments under simulated microgravity [32]	Allows for gas exchange (O₂/CO₂) while being rotated on an RPM [32].
Random Positioning Machine	Ground-based analog to simulate microgravity conditions [32]	Used to test the effect of low-shear, altered gravity on microbial growth and physiology [32].
Chlorophyll Fluorometer	Measures photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm ratio) [30]	Quantifies physiological stress in cultures exposed to non-optimal temperatures [30].

Discussion and Synthesis

The quantitative data and experimental evidence reveal a nuanced landscape for species selection, dependent on mission-specific parameters and system architecture.

• Limnospira's primary strength lies in its high technological readiness level and proven role in BLSS projects like MELiSSA [3] [32]. Its established history as a safe nutritional supplement is a significant advantage for closing the food loop [29]. However, its sensitivity to storage conditions and demonstrated reduction in growth rate under simulated microgravity warrant careful hardware design to mitigate these stressors [24] [32].

• Chlorella vulgaris demonstrates remarkable resilience and adaptability, particularly in the context of multifunctional system design. Its ability to acclimate to rapid temperature cycling between 9-27°C makes it a robust candidate for a photobioreactor that also functions as a cabin heat sink [30]. Furthermore, its capacity for long-term, high-density cultivation has been successfully demonstrated in novel, microgravity-capable photobioreactors [31].

• Antarctic Chlorophyta represents a specialized solution for low-temperature operations. Native to the extreme and fluctuating environment of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, these species are pre-adapted to the cold thermal control loops of a spacecraft [30]. Their ability to maintain photosynthetic performance and higher physiological stress ratings (Fv/Fm) at 4-14°C suggests they could provide system stability where thermal management is a primary constraint [30].

This comparative analysis underscores that there is no single optimal candidate for all mission scenarios. Limnospira is a strong candidate for near-term missions focused on nutritional supplementation and air revitalization within a stable thermal environment. Chlorella vulgaris offers versatility and robustness for systems requiring multifunctionality, such as combined air revitalization and thermal control. Antarctic Chlorophyta presents a promising extremophile option for enhancing the stability and efficiency of systems operating at lower temperatures. Future research and development should focus on multi-species consortia that leverage the unique strengths of each organism, ground-to-flight validation in advanced photobioreactor hardware, and further investigation into the synergistic effects of combined spaceflight stressors, such as radiation and microgravity, on long-term physiological and genetic stability.

Engineering Breathable Environments: System Design and Implementation Strategies

The pursuit of human space exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) necessitates advanced life support systems that enable crew self-sufficiency over prolonged durations. Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent a paradigm shift from current physicochemical methods, offering sustainable resource regeneration through biological processes [35]. Within this framework, microbial photosynthesis in photobioreactors (PBRs) is a critical technology for atmospheric revitalization—the process of continuously removing metabolic carbon dioxide (CO₂) and producing breathable oxygen (O₂) for crewed habitats [35] [3]. Unlike Earth-based applications, space-destined PBRs must operate reliably under extreme constraints, including microgravity, high radiation, severe mass and volume limitations, and minimal resupply options [35] [36]. This technical guide examines the design principles, configurations, and experimental methodologies for PBRs engineered to support human exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

Fundamental Design Principles for Space Photobioreactors

The design of photobioreactors for space applications is governed by a set of interlinked principles that prioritize system closure, operational resilience, and minimal resource consumption.

The Role of PBRs in Air Revitalization

In a functional BLSS, photobioreactors housing cyanobacteria or microalgae perform the essential function of air revitalization. A typical crew member consumes approximately 0.82 kg of O₂ and produces 1.04 kg of CO₂ per day [35]. Photosynthetic microorganisms within PBRs reverse this respiratory process, consuming CO₂ and water in the presence of light to produce biomass and oxygen. This process is described by the fundamental equation of photosynthesis, which is the cornerstone of biological air revitalization:

[ 6CO2 + 6H2O + \text{Light Energy} \rightarrow C6H{12}O6 + 6O2 ]

This biological approach contrasts with the current International Space Station (ISS) system, which relies on a complex, consumable-dependent assembly of hardware: a Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), an Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) for water electrolysis, and a Carbon Dioxide Reduction Assembly (CRA) that uses the Sabatier reaction [35]. A PBR-based system integrates these functions into a single, regenerative biological process, thereby closing the carbon-oxygen loop and reducing dependency on Earth-based resupply [35] [3].

Core Engineering Constraints

Designing PBRs for space entails addressing several unique environmental and programmatic constraints:

• Mass and Volume: Launch costs, projected to be on the order of \$300,000 per kg to Mars, demand extreme mass efficiency [37]. PBR designs must maximize the surface area-to-volume ratio for efficient light capture while minimizing total system mass.
• Microgravity Effects: The absence of buoyancy-driven convection in microgravity alters fluid dynamics, gas-liquid transfer, and sedimenting processes [36]. This can lead to the formation of thicker diffusion boundary layers around cells, potentially limiting nutrient uptake and gas exchange [36]. Mixing must be achieved through forced aeration or mechanical agitation, which itself consumes energy.
• Radiation: Beyond Earth's protective magnetosphere, crews and biological systems are exposed to elevated levels of Galactic Cosmic Radiation (GCR) and Solar Particle Events (SPEs) [37]. This can damage microbial DNA and impact PBR performance, necessitating radiation-resistant strains or shielding strategies.
• Power and Thermal Control: Power is a limited resource. Artificial illumination, a significant power draw, must be highly efficient. Thermal rejection is also challenging in a vacuum, requiring careful management of heat from lights and control systems.

Photobioreactor Configurations and Performance Analysis

The choice of PBR configuration is a critical design decision that balances geometric form, illumination strategy, and mixing mechanism against mission constraints. The following table summarizes key PBR types and their suitability for space applications.

Table 1: Comparison of Photobioreactor Configurations for Space Applications

Reactor Type	Key Features	Advantages for Space	Disadvantages & Challenges
Flat Panel PBRs	Rectangular vessels with small light path; high surface-to-volume ratio [38] [39].	High volumetric productivity; uniform light distribution; scalable modular design [39].	Gas transfer can be limited; requires precise sparger design to avoid dead zones [39].
Bubble Column & Airlift PBRs	Cylindrical vertical columns; gas introduced via sparger at bottom; airlift variants have internal draft tube [38].	Homogenous gas distribution; good mixing with low shear stress; relatively simple construction [38].	Mixing is gravity-dependent (challenging in µg); tall geometry may be unsuitable for some spacecraft [36].
* Tubular PBRs*	Long, transparent tubes arranged in parallel loops; culture pumped through system [38].	Large illuminated surface area; suitable for outdoor deployment on planetary surfaces [38].	Can experience high O₂ buildup; pumping requires significant energy; prone to biofilm fouling.
Plastic Bag PBRs	Disposable, flexible plastic film bags [38].	Extremely low mass; compact storage pre-deployment; low cost [38].	Low durability; high risk of contamination; difficult to scale with control; challenging gas transfer [38].
Microfluidic PBRs	Lab-on-a-chip devices with culture compartments and fluidic channels [38].	Minimal reagent and sample use; ideal for automated, high-throughput research in space [38].	Currently at research stage; not suitable for bulk production; miniaturization adds complexity.

Recent research has focused on optimizing these configurations for space. For instance, a study on 10 L Flat-Panel PBRs investigated sintered metal spargers with 5 μm pores to generate micro-size bubbles, which significantly improved mixing and gas transfer [39]. The study found that an intermittent airflow regime (20 seconds ON, 10 seconds OFF) provided adequate mixing with a 33% reduction in energy consumption compared to continuous flow, a critical consideration for power-limited missions [39]. This optimized configuration enhanced the growth of Chlorella sorokiniana, achieving a specific growth rate of 0.56 d⁻¹ and a CO₂ fixation rate of 0.21 g L⁻¹ d⁻¹ [39].

Experimental Protocols for System Validation

Rigorous ground-based testing is essential to de-risk PBR technology before spaceflight. The following protocols outline key methodologies for evaluating PBR performance and microbial physiology.

Protocol: Quantifying Air Revitalization Performance

This protocol measures the core functionality of a PBR: the rate of CO₂ consumption and O₂ production.

• System Setup: Integrate the PBR with a calibrated gas mixing system to supply a known CO₂ concentration (e.g., 0.5-1% in air, simulating cabin air [35]) and a sealed gas analysis loop.
• Culture Conditions: Inoculate the PBR with a target microorganism (e.g., the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp.) under sterile conditions. Maintain temperature and provide continuous, quantified illumination [35] [37].
• Data Acquisition:
  • Use inline Non-Dispersive Infrared (NDIR) CO₂ sensors and Paramagnetic O₂ sensors to continuously monitor gas concentrations in the inlet and outlet streams.
  • Record the volumetric gas flow rate using a mass flow meter.
  • Track biomass concentration via optical density (OD750) or dry cell weight.
• Data Analysis:
  • Calculate the CO₂ consumption rate (R{CO2}) and O₂ production rate (R{O2}) using the following formulas, where F is the gas flow rate and C is the concentration:
    • ( R{CO2} = F \times (C{CO2}^{in} - C{CO2}^{out}) )
    • ( R{O2} = F \times (C{O2}^{out} - C{O2}^{in}) )
  • The photosynthetic quotient (PQ = R{O2} / R{CO2}) should ideally approach 1.0, validating stoichiometric gas exchange [35].

Protocol: Hydrodynamic and Mixing Characterization in Simulated Microgravity

Assessing fluid dynamics and mixing efficiency under simulated microgravity is crucial for predicting performance in space.

• Simulated Microgravity Device: Employ a Random Positioning Machine (RPM) or a rotating wall vessel to nullify the directional component of gravity for the PBR system [36].
• Flow Visualization:
  • Tracer Dye Imaging: Inject a bolus of fluorescent dye (e.g., fluorescein) into the culture and use a high-speed camera under UV illumination to capture its dispersion. This qualitatively reveals flow patterns, vortices, and stagnant zones [39].
  • Particle Tracking: Seed the culture with fluorescent microspheres. Track the motion of individual particles over time to quantify velocity fields and mixing times [39].
• Mixing Time Quantification: In the PBR under RPM operation, inject a tracer and use a pH or conductivity probe to measure the time required for the tracer concentration to reach 95% of its final, homogeneous value [39].
• Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): Develop a CFD model of the PBR to simulate fluid flow, species transport, and shear stress. Validate the model against the experimental data obtained from steps 2 and 3 [40].

The diagram below illustrates the logical workflow for the experimental characterization of a space-bound PBR.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Successful PBR research and operation depend on a suite of specialized biological and engineering materials.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Space PBR Studies

Item	Function & Application
Cyanobacteria/ Microalgae Strains (e.g., Anabaena sp., Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina, Synechocystis sp.)	Primary photosynthetic chassis for O₂ production and CO₂ sequestration. Selected for resilience, growth efficiency, and compatibility with space constraints [35] [37].
Synthetic Biology Toolkits (e.g., CRISPR-Cas systems, BioBricks)	For genetic engineering of microbial chassis to enhance traits like radiation resistance, nutrient uptake, or production of specific high-value products [37].
Specialized Culture Media (e.g., BG-11, BBM)	Provides essential macro/micro-nutrients (N, P, trace metals). Can be optimized for use with in-situ resources like regolith leachate or crew waste streams [3] [40].
Fluorescent Tracers (e.g., Fluorescein dye, fluorescent microspheres)	Used in hydrodynamic studies to visualize and quantify flow patterns, mixing efficiency, and identify dead zones within PBRs [39].
In-line & At-line Sensors (e.g., pH, dissolved O₂/CO₂, optical density probes)	Enable real-time, non-invasive monitoring and control of critical culture parameters, ensuring process stability and enabling automated operation [41].
Membrane Filtration Units (Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration)	Integrated with PBRs in Membrane Photobioreactors (MPBRs) to continuously harvest biomass and control culture density, improving nutrient removal and productivity [42].

Future Directions and Synthesis

The future of PBRs for space exploration is inextricably linked with advances in synthetic biology and In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). Research is increasingly focused on engineering cyanobacteria and microalgae to thrive on Martian resources (e.g., a 96% N₂, 4% CO₂ atmosphere at low pressure) and produce not only oxygen but also food, bioplastics, and pharmaceuticals on-demand [37]. The convergence of optimized PBR hardware, robust, engineered biological strains, and intelligent control systems will ultimately yield the fully autonomous, bioregenerative life support systems required for humanity's sustainable future in space.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are fundamental for enabling long-duration human space exploration, as they aim to create a sustainable, closed-loop environment for astronauts. Within this framework, microbial photosynthesis—utilizing cyanobacteria and microalgae for air revitalization—presents a promising strategy for oxygen production and carbon dioxide sequestration. However, the practical implementation of these biological systems requires their seamless integration with the existing, primarily physicochemical, Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS). This integration poses significant engineering challenges, particularly in the domains of thermal control and waste recycling. Effective thermal management is critical as photosynthetic efficiency and microbial metabolism are highly sensitive to temperature fluctuations. Simultaneously, a synergistic approach to waste recycling can transform crew waste streams into nutrients that sustain the microbial cultures, thereby closing the resource loop. This technical guide examines the core interfaces between microbial photosynthesis and ECLSS, providing detailed methodologies and data to inform the development of robust, integrated systems for future missions to the Moon and Mars.

Thermal Control for Microbial Photosynthesis in ECLSS

The integration of photosynthetic microorganisms into a spacecraft's ECLSS introduces specific thermal requirements that must be actively managed to maintain culture health and optimal function.

Thermal Interface Requirements

Photosynthetic cultures, such as the cyanobacterium Limnospira indica, are poised for air revitalization in space due to their capabilities in oxygen production and carbon dioxide removal [4]. Their metabolic activity, and thus their life support functionality, is highly dependent on a narrow temperature range. The ECLSS must therefore provide precise temperature control to avoid either thermal inhibition or suboptimal performance.

The thermal load from these systems is twofold: (1) the metabolic heat generated by the microbial culture itself, and (2) the heat transferred from external hardware and cabin environment. The ECLSS's thermal control system must be designed to reject this excess heat to maintain the culture at its target temperature, typically between 20-30°C for many candidate species [43]. Key components for this function include:

• Cold Plates: These are strategically mounted to the life support hardware, such as bioreactor housings, to conductively remove excess heat generated by the culture and associated electronics [44].
• Pumped Fluid Loops: These active systems circulate a coolant to transfer heat from the cold plates to the external radiators [44].
• Radiators: As the final heat rejection point, radiators expel the collected waste heat from the spacecraft into the cold of space [44].

Table 1: Thermal Control Components and Their Functions in Support of Microbial Systems

Component	Function in ECLSS	Role in Microbial Photosynthesis Support
Cold Plates	Dissipate heat from electronics and systems [44]	Maintain optimal temperature of bioreactor and culture media.
Pumped Fluid Loops	Actively transfer heat via circulating coolant [44]	Transport heat away from the biological system to radiators.
Radiators	Reject collected heat into space [44]	Serve as the ultimate heat sink for the biological thermal load.
Heat Exchangers	Recover thermal energy and humidity from air [44]	Pre-condition temperature and humidity of gas streams fed to bioreactor.

Thermal Load and System Sizing

Quantifying the thermal load is essential for proper ECLSS sizing. The load originates from several sources:

• Metabolic Heat: The photosynthetic and metabolic processes of the microorganisms generate heat.
• Illumination Systems: The lighting required for photosynthesis (e.g., LED arrays) produces significant waste heat that must be removed.
• Process Hardware: Pumps, sensors, and control electronics associated with the bioreactor contribute to the total thermal load.

A failure in thermal management can lead to cascading system failures. For instance, elevated temperatures can reduce photosynthetic oxygen production, potentially leading to a drop in cabin oxygen levels and triggering alarms in the central ECLSS [43]. Therefore, thermal systems are designed with redundancy and must be capable of handling variable loads as the microbial culture grows and its metabolic activity changes.

Waste Stream Recycling for Microbial Cultivation

A core advantage of incorporating biology into life support is the ability to recycle waste into resources. Microbial cultures can directly utilize waste streams generated by the crew and other biological systems, closing the loop and reducing reliance on Earth-based resupply.

Integration with Waste Management Systems

BLSS research has demonstrated the vital role of microbes in the regulation, degradation, and circulation of materials and energy [3]. The integration involves:

• Liquid Waste Processing: Treated greywater and humidity condensate from the ECLSS Water Recovery System can be a source of water and water-soluble minerals for the microbial culture medium [6] [3].
• Solid Waste Processing: Inedible plant biomass from crop cultivation and human solid waste can be processed by microbial digesters (e.g., in systems like MELiSSA) to break down organic matter [6] [3]. The resulting effluent, rich in nitrates, phosphates, and other nutrients, can be fed back to the plant compartment and the photosynthetic microbes, thereby supporting air revitalization [6].

Table 2: Waste Stream Utilization for Microbial Photosynthetic Systems

Waste Stream Source	Potential Contribution	Benefit to Microbial Culture
Crew Liquid Waste	Water, Ammonia, Urea [3]	Source of hydrogen and nitrogen for microbial growth.
Inedible Plant Biomass	Complex organics, Minerals [6] [3]	Once broken down, provides carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.
Atmospheric CO₂	Carbon Dioxide [4] [6]	Primary carbon source for photosynthesis and O₂ production.
Cabin Air	Trace Contaminants [2]	Potential for biological degradation of volatile organics.

Experimental Evidence and Protocols

Ground-based and spaceflight experiments are validating these integration concepts. For example, the Plant Habitat-07 experiment on the International Space Station studies the growth of red romaine lettuce and the types of microbes the plants support, providing data on the microbial ecology of space-grown crops [45]. Furthermore, research on Limnospira indica has investigated its resilience after storage, a critical factor for its integration into mission logistics [4].

Protocol: Assessing Microbial Gas Exchange Using Simulated Waste-Derived Nutrients

• Objective: To quantify the oxygen production and carbon dioxide consumption rates of a photosynthetic microbe (Limnospira indica or Chlorella vulgaris) when cultivated on a growth medium derived from simulated waste streams.
• Materials:
  • Photobioreactor with integrated gas sensors (O₂ and CO₂), temperature control, and lighting.
  • Sterilized simulated waste effluent (synthesized to mimic the mineral output of a solid waste processor).
  • Axenic culture of the test microorganism.
  • Standard culture medium for control.
  • Gas chromatograph for validation of in-situ sensor data.
• Methodology:
  • Inoculate the photobioreactor with the test microorganism at a standard initial cell concentration [4].
  • Continuously monitor and record dissolved O₂, CO₂, pH, and temperature.
  • Illuminate the culture at a constant, saturating light intensity (e.g., 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) [43].
  • Calculate the gas exchange rates by measuring the change in O₂ and CO₂ concentrations in the headspace over time.
  • Compare the growth rates and gas exchange kinetics between the experimental (waste-derived) and control media.

Interconnection Logic of an Integrated System

The following diagram illustrates the operational and data interfaces between the microbial air revitalization system and the core ECLSS subsystems of thermal control and waste recycling.

The diagram above, Integrated System Logic for Microbial ECLSS, shows how the microbial photosynthesis module is not a standalone component but is deeply interconnected with the core ECLSS. The Thermal Control subsystem actively manages the metabolic heat load from the bioreactor to maintain optimal temperature. The Waste Recycling subsystem processes cabin waste into liquid nutrients that sustain the microbial culture. In return, the microbial module provides oxygen to the Cabin Environment and consumes carbon dioxide, working in concert with the broader Air Revitalization system.

Detailed Experimental Protocol for System Integration

To empirically test the integration points described, the following comprehensive protocol can be implemented.

Protocol: Co-optimization of Thermal and Nutrient Parameters for Microbial O₂ Production

• Objective: To determine the optimal combination of temperature and waste-derived nutrient concentration that maximizes the oxygen production rate of a candidate cyanobacterium while maintaining system stability.
• Experimental Design:
  • A factorial design with two key factors: Temperature (e.g., 20°C, 25°C, 30°C) and Nutrient Concentration (e.g., 25%, 50%, 100% of simulated waste effluent).
  • The response variables are O₂ production rate (mg L⁻¹ h⁻¹), CO₂ consumption rate, and culture growth density (OD750).
• Materials:
  • Multiple, identical bench-top photobioreactors with independent temperature control (e.g., via water jackets connected to recirculating chillers) [44].
  • Prepared media with varying concentrations of standardized waste effluent.
  • Inoculum of Limnospira indica PCC8005 [4].
  • Data logging system for O₂, CO₂, temperature, and pH.
• Procedure:
  • Calibrate all gas and pH sensors prior to inoculation.
  • Fill each reactor with its assigned medium and inoculate to a standard initial cell concentration [4].
  • Set each reactor to its designated temperature setpoint.
  • Initiate illumination with a constant, saturating light intensity.
  • Monitor and log all parameters continuously for the duration of the experiment (e.g., 7-10 days).
  • Take periodic samples for offline analysis of cell density and pigment content to assess culture health [4].
  • Calculate peak and time-averaged gas exchange rates for each condition.
• Data Analysis:
  • Use Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine the statistical significance of the main effects (temperature, nutrients) and their interaction on the oxygen production rate.
  • Generate response surface plots to identify the optimal operational window for the integrated system.

The workflow for this experiment is summarized in the diagram below.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents and Materials

The following table details essential materials and reagents for conducting experimental research on the integration of microbial photosynthesis with ECLSS.

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for Microbial-ECLSS Integration Studies

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Example/Notes
Axenic Microbial Cultures	Core biological agent for O₂ production and CO₂ consumption.	Limnospira indica PCC8005 [4], Chlorella vulgaris [43].
Simulated Waste Effluent	Testing nutrient recycling and microbial growth on mission-relevant resources.	Chemically defined mix mimicking mineral output of waste processors (Nitrates, Phosphates) [3].
Defined Culture Media	Control medium for baseline comparisons of microbial performance.	Standard salt-based liquid media for cyanobacteria or microalgae [43].
Photobioreactor System	Controlled environment for cultivating microbes and measuring gas exchange.	System with illumination, temperature control, and integrated O₂/CO₂ sensors [4].
Gas Chromatograph	Validating and calibrating in-situ gas sensor measurements.	For precise quantification of O₂ and CO₂ concentrations in gas streams.
Temperature Control Unit	Maintaining and manipulating thermal setpoints for experiments.	Recirculating water chiller/heater connected to reactor jackets [44].
Light Intensity Meter	Quantifying and standardizing the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD).	Calibrated PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) meter.

The challenge of human space exploration beyond low Earth orbit requires the development of advanced systems that can reliably supply air, water, and food for crew members independently from Earth. Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) aim to overcome these challenges using biological systems for waste treatment, air and water revitalization, and food production. Within this context, synthetic biology offers revolutionary potential by enabling the engineering of specialized microbial chassis—optimized host organisms that serve as platforms for biological design. These engineered microbes can perform specific, enhanced functions such as photosynthetic air revitalization, which involves the efficient removal of toxic carbon dioxide (CO₂) and production of oxygen (O₂) and edible biomass. The development of such systems represents a crucial step toward sustainable, long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars, where resupply from Earth is impractical [35].

The current systems used on the International Space Station (ISS), such as the Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA) and Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA), rely on physicochemical methods that consume significant resources and produce waste. In contrast, photosynthetic microbial systems using algae and cyanobacteria can regenerate air through natural processes while simultaneously producing biomass that can serve as a food source. This article explores the synthetic biology approaches being used to engineer microbial chassis for enhanced performance in BLSS, focusing on the critical processes of air revitalization through microbial photosynthesis [35].

Microbial Chassis Selection and Engineering Strategies

Chassis Selection Criteria for Space Applications

Selecting an appropriate microbial chassis is fundamental to the success of synthetic biology applications in space environments. Ideal chassis organisms for BLSS must meet specific criteria: genetic manageability for ease of engineering, growth robustness to thrive in space conditions, genetic stability over multiple generations, and predictable behavior when integrated with synthetic genetic circuits. In the specific context of air revitalization and space applications, additional considerations include photosynthetic efficiency, radiation resistance, and minimal resource requirements [46].

Two primary approaches dominate chassis development: the top-down approach (genome reduction) and the bottom-up approach (genome synthesis). The top-down approach involves simplifying existing genomes by removing non-essential elements, thereby creating a more predictable and efficient platform for synthetic biology. The bottom-up approach focuses on constructing minimal genomes from scratch that contain only the essential genes required for life and the desired functions. For space applications, the reduced genome concept is often more suitable than a true minimal genome, as it retains necessary metabolic flexibility while improving performance and predictability [47] [46].

Genome Streamlining and Engineering Toolkits

Genome streamlining addresses the "host-interference problem"—unpredictable interactions between synthetic genetic devices and the host's native cellular machinery that can hamper desired functions. By reducing genomic complexity, engineers can create more orthogonal systems that function independently from host processes. Key methods for genome editing in potential chassis organisms include:

• Homologous recombination using systems like the bacteriophage-derived Red recombinase, which significantly increases recombination efficiency with only 30–50 bp overlapping flanking regions required [46].
• Meganuclease-based systems such as I-SecI from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which introduce DNA breaks at unique recognition sequences that can only be repaired through homologous recombination, yielding double recombinants at efficiencies of 27–52% [46].
• Oligonucleotide recombineering which uses synthetic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotides that recombine with genomic DNA during replication, incorporating as Okazaki fragments [46].

For photosynthetic chassis specifically, specialized toolkits like the Modular Cloning (MoClo) toolkit for the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii have been developed. This toolkit, based on Golden Gate cloning with standard syntax, comprises 119 openly distributed genetic parts including promoters, UTRs, terminators, tags, reporters, antibiotic resistance genes, and introns. Such toolkits enable rapid building of engineered cells specifically designed for photosynthetic applications in sustainable synthetic biology [48].

Table 1: Comparison of Model Photosynthetic Microbial Chassis for Space Applications

Organism	Type	Key Advantages	Genetic Tools Available	Space-Relevant Performance
Limnospira indica	Cyanobacterium	High oxygen production, edible biomass	MELiSSA project tools	Successfully cultured in space flight hardware [49]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii	Green Microalga	Well-studied photosynthesis, genetic flexibility	MoClo Toolkit (119 parts) [48]	Promising for oxygen production and biomass [48]
Synechocystis sp.	Cyanobacterium	Simple genetic manipulation, model organism	Standard cyanobacterial tools	High CO₂ fixation rates studied on ground [35]
Streptomyces avermitilis	Actinobacterium (Engineered)	Reduced genome, specialized metabolite production	SUKA22 strain for heterologous expression [46]	Potential for pharmaceutical production in space

Photosynthetic Microbial Systems for Air Revitalization

Biological Air Revitalization Principles

Photosynthetic microorganisms, including cyanobacteria and microalgae, play a crucial role in biological air revitalization through their natural metabolic processes. These organisms utilize light energy to convert CO₂ and water (H₂O) into organic compounds and oxygen via photosynthesis. A standard 82 kg crew member consumes approximately 0.82 kg d⁻¹ of O₂ and produces 1.04 kg d⁻¹ of CO₂ and 1.85 kg d⁻¹ of water vapor during intravehicular activities. The respiratory quotient (mole CO₂ produced per mole O₂ consumed) is approximately 0.92, though this varies with physical workload, diet, and individual metabolism [35].

In space habitats, maintaining proper atmospheric composition is critical for crew health. The maximum allowable CO₂ concentration on the ISS is ≤0.52 kPa (5,200 ppm), though levels as low as 0.33% CO₂ over 7 days are recommended to minimize headache risk. Oxygen partial pressure should range between 18 and 23.1 kPa, depending on the total cabin pressure regime. Photosynthetic systems must be precisely controlled to maintain these parameters within safe limits while maximizing efficiency [35].

Experimental Performance of Photosynthetic Systems

Ground-based and space flight experiments have demonstrated the feasibility of using photosynthetic microbes for air revitalization. The ARTHROSPIRA-C space flight experiment, part of the European Space Agency's MELiSSA project, has validated the cultivation of the cyanobacterium Limnospira indica in space flight hardware. In pre-space tests, the system demonstrated:

• Oxygen production rates between 0.10 ± 0.03 and 0.45 ± 0.01 mmol O₂ L⁻¹ h⁻¹
• Biomass production rates between 0.008 ± 0.000 and 0.021 ± 0.002 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹
• Sustained photosynthetic activity across light intensities ranging from 45 to 80 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ [49]

These experiments employed a one-week batch mode followed by four semi-continuous cycles of two weeks each, with increasing light intensity regimes. Proteomic analysis from these tests revealed light intensity-induced effects on carbon and nitrogen assimilation metabolic pathways, while lipidomic analysis showed consistent biomass lipid composition across all tested light conditions—important information for both life support and food production applications [49].

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Photosynthetic Bioreactors for Air Revitalization

Parameter	Limnospira indica (ARTHROSPIRA-C) [49]	Chlorella (BIOS Projects) [35]	Theoretical Requirements for 1 Crew Member [35]
Oxygen Production Rate	0.10–0.45 mmol O₂ L⁻¹ h⁻¹	~0.85 mmol O₂ L⁻¹ h⁻¹ (estimated)	~25.6 mmol O₂ h⁻¹ (0.82 kg d⁻¹)
Biomass Production Rate	0.008–0.021 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹	0.015–0.030 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹ (estimated)	Varies by nutritional requirements
CO₂ Consumption Rate	Not specified (theoretically ~0.92×O₂ production)	Not specified	~23.6 mmol CO₂ h⁻¹ (1.04 kg d⁻¹)
Light Intensity Range	45–80 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹	50–100 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ (estimated)	Depends on system design and efficiency

Diagram 1: Microbial Photosynthesis for Air Revitalization. This diagram illustrates the core process where engineered photosynthetic microorganisms convert light, CO₂, and water into oxygen and edible biomass.

Experimental Protocols for Chassis Engineering and Validation

Genome Reduction Protocol for Streptomyces Species

Genome reduction creates optimized chassis with minimized host interference, particularly valuable for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. The following protocol has been successfully applied to Streptomyces species for development of specialized chassis:

• Comparative Genomic Analysis: Identify non-essential genomic regions through comparison of multiple bacterial genomes. For Streptomyces, this has revealed a core genome of approximately 2018 orthologous genes representing 24–38% of analyzed genomes [46].

• Design Deletion Strategy: Plan sequential deletions of non-essential genomic regions, focusing on areas with:

  • No known essential functions
  • Potential interference with secondary metabolism
  • Mobile genetic elements and phages
  • Genes producing unwanted metabolites

• Implement Deletions Using Recombineering:

  • Prepare targeting cassettes with selectable markers flanked by 30–50 bp homology arms
  • Introduce cassettes into cells expressing phage-derived Red recombinase
  • Select for successful integrants using appropriate antibiotics
  • Verify deletions via colony PCR and sequencing

• Marker Excision and Cycle Repetition:

  • Remove selection markers using FLP/FRT or Cre/loxP systems
  • Repeat process for subsequent deletions
  • Continuously monitor for maintained genetic stability and growth characteristics

• Phenotypic Validation:

  • Assess growth rates in simulated space conditions (altered gravity, radiation)
  • Measure secondary metabolite production capabilities
  • Evaluate genetic transformation efficiency
  • Test resilience to space-relevant stressors

The resulting reduced-genome strains, such as E. coli MGF-01 and Streptomyces avermitilis SUKA22, have demonstrated improved growth characteristics and higher production of target compounds compared to their parental strains [47] [46].

Photobioreactor Cultivation Protocol for Space Applications

Cultivating photosynthetic microbes in space requires specialized protocols adapted to microgravity conditions and space hardware constraints. The following protocol is derived from the ARTHROSPIRA-C experiment:

• Culture Preparation and Storage:

  • Prepare axenic cultures of the photosynthetic chassis (e.g., Limnospira indica)
  • Concentrate cells and suspend in appropriate preservation medium
  • Store in sealed photobioreactor bags compatible with space flight hardware

• Revival and Batch Propagation:

  • Activate stored cultures by injecting fresh medium
  • Maintain at 45 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ for one week in batch mode
  • Monitor culture density, dissolved O₂, and pH daily

• Semi-Continuous Operation:

  • Initiate semi-continuous cycles with daily medium exchange (10–30% volume replacement)
  • Implement progressive light intensity regime:
    • Cycle 1: 45 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ for two weeks
    • Cycle 2: 55 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ for two weeks
    • Cycle 3: 70 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ for two weeks
    • Cycle 4: 80 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ for two weeks

• Performance Monitoring:

  • Measure biomass production rates via optical density and dry weight measurements
  • Quantify oxygen production using dissolved oxygen probes and gas phase analysis
  • Monitor CO₂ consumption through inlet-outlet gas concentration measurements
  • Collect samples for proteomic and lipidomic analysis to assess metabolic changes

• System Maintenance:

  • Perform regular sterility checks to prevent contamination
  • Calibrate sensors and instruments according to manufacturer specifications
  • Document any anomalies or deviations from expected performance

This protocol has successfully demonstrated sustained photosynthetic activity and production of both oxygen and biomass in ground-based tests that mimic space flight conditions [49].

Diagram 2: Chassis Genome Reduction Workflow. This workflow outlines the systematic process for creating reduced-genome microbial chassis with improved characteristics for synthetic biology applications.

Research Reagent Solutions for Space Synthetic Biology

The development and implementation of engineered microbial chassis for space applications requires specialized research reagents and tools. The following table details key solutions used in this emerging field:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Tools for Engineering Photosynthetic Chassis

Reagent/Tool Category	Specific Examples	Function and Application	Implementation in Space Research
Genetic Parts Toolkits	MoClo Toolkit for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (119 parts) [48]	Standardized genetic elements for rapid construct assembly	Enables engineering of photosynthetic chassis for air revitalization
Genome Editing Systems	Red recombinase, I-SceI meganuclease, CRISPR-Cas systems [46]	Targeted genome modifications and reductions	Creation of optimized chassis with improved predictability and function
Bioinformatic Tools	antiSMASH, SBOL Designer, Eugene [46] [50]	Design and analysis of genetic constructs and metabolic pathways	In silico design of genetic circuits for enhanced photosynthesis
Visualization Standards	SBOL Visual glyphs [51] [50]	Standardized diagrammatic representation of biological designs	Clear communication of genetic designs across research teams
Specialized Cultivation Media	MELiSSA-compatible growth media [49]	Optimized nutrient delivery for photosynthetic microbes in closed systems	Supports robust growth in space photobioreactors
Analytical Tools for Performance Validation	Dissolved oxygen probes, biomass sensors, GC-MS for gas analysis [49]	Real-time monitoring of photosynthetic efficiency and gas exchange	Verification of air revitalization performance in ground and flight experiments

Synthetic biology approaches to engineering microbial chassis represent a transformative strategy for developing advanced Bioregenerative Life Support Systems for space exploration. Through careful chassis selection, genome streamlining, and the application of standardized genetic toolkits, researchers are creating photosynthetic microorganisms with enhanced capabilities for simultaneous air revitalization and biomass production. The successful ground-based validation of systems like the ARTHROSPIRA-C photobioreactor demonstrates the feasibility of this approach, while highlighting areas for further refinement.

Future advancements will likely focus on increasing the efficiency and reliability of these biological systems, particularly in the challenging space environment. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for chassis design, development of more sophisticated genetic control systems, and creation of multi-species consortia for complementary functions will further enhance system performance. As these technologies mature, they will play an increasingly critical role in enabling sustainable human presence beyond Earth, ultimately supporting the ambitious goals of lunar bases and manned missions to Mars.

For long-duration crewed missions to the Moon and Mars, achieving self-sufficiency through Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) is paramount. These systems generate essential resources for human survival through biological processes, with four main purposes: higher plant cultivation, water treatment, solid waste bioconversion, and atmosphere revitalization [3]. Microbial photosynthesis plays a crucial role in air revitalization within these artificial ecosystems, utilizing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen through oxygenic photosynthesis while simultaneously transforming in-situ resources into valuable biomass [52] [3]. Bio-In-Situ Resource Utilization (Bio-ISRU) leverages the capabilities of living microorganisms to grow using local resources and perform biochemical processes to produce consumables, thereby reducing reliance on Earth-based resupplies [52]. This technical guide examines the pathways, challenges, and experimental protocols for implementing Bio-ISRU systems focused on air revitalization for sustainable space exploration.

Microbial Pathways for Extraterrestrial Bio-ISRU

Cyanobacterial Systems for Oxygen Production and Biomass Generation

Cyanobacteria perform oxygenic photosynthesis and carbon dioxide fixation, making them ideal candidates for BLSS [52]. The European Space Agency's Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) employs Limnospira indica (previously Arthrospira), an edible cyanobacterium with high protein content [52]. Beyond direct consumption, rock-weathering cyanobacteria can use local resources, and their biomass can serve as feedstock for other bacteria relevant to bioprocesses [52]. These microorganisms are particularly valuable because they can utilize the carbon dioxide exhaled by crew members and return oxygen to the atmosphere through photosynthesis, creating a continuous cycle for air revitalization.

Two primary cyanobacterial adaptations show particular promise for extraterrestrial implementation:

• Far-Red Light Photoacclimation (FaRLiP): This process consists of a remodeling of the photosynthetic apparatus and synthesis of far-red absorbing chlorophylls (Chl f and d) that enable absorption and utilization of far-red light (FRL) [52]. This adaptation is advantageous for Bio-ISRU because compared to Earth, the light reaching the Martian surface has less intensity and is shifted toward longer wavelengths [52]. Cyanobacteria with FaRLiP capability, such as Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 010, can better overcome regolith shading in turbid growth media [52].

• Extreme Environment Tolerance: Cyanobacteria of the Chroococcidiopsis genus exhibit desiccation- and radiation-resistance along with tolerance towards perchlorate ions found in Martian regolith [52]. Strain CCMEE 029 has been successfully cultivated with lunar and Martian regolith simulants supplemented with synthetic human urine and 2.4 mM perchlorate ions [52].

Biocementation for Structural Applications

Biocementation via Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) offers an ISRU-compatible alternative for construction materials, operating under low-energy conditions suitable for constrained power infrastructure on Mars [53]. The ureolytic pathway has been identified as the most feasible for near-term Martian application [53]. This process not only provides structural materials for habitat construction but can be integrated with air revitalization systems by utilizing waste carbon dioxide streams.

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Cultivation with Martian Regolith Simulants

Objective: To assess cyanobacterial growth and biomass production using water-released minerals from Martian regolith simulants under relevant space conditions.

Materials:

• Strains: Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 010 (FaRLiP strain) and CCMEE 029 (non-FaRLiP strain) [52]
• Growth Media:
  • BG-11 control medium (standard)
  • Medium based on water-released minerals from Martian regolith simulant JSC Mars-1A [52]
• Supplements: 10 mM urea, 2.4 mM perchlorate [52]

Methodology:

• Preparation of Water-Released Minerals: Shake Martian regolith simulant (JSC Mars-1A) with water at 6 r.p.m. for 8 hours at room temperature [52]. Collect supernatant after centrifugation at 100 g for 10 minutes [52].
• Culture Conditions: Inoculate strains in both control and experimental media. Maintain cultures for 21 days under visible light [52].
• Analysis:
  • Monitor cell morphology changes via microscopy
  • Measure photosynthetic pigment emission spectra
  • Analyze biomass accumulation
  • Assess ability of biomass lysates to support growth of heterotrophic bacteria [52]

Biocementation Assessment for Martian Construction

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of MICP for producing construction materials from Martian regolith.

Materials:

• Ureolytic bacteria (e.g., Sporosarcina pasteurii)
• Martian regolith simulants
• Calcium source
• Urea solution

Methodology:

• Bacterial Cultivation: Grow ureolytic bacteria in appropriate media [53]
• Cementation Solution Preparation: Prepare solutions containing calcium chloride and urea [53]
• Treatment Process: Saturate regolith simulant with bacterial culture followed by cementation solutions in multiple cycles [53]
• Analysis:
  • Measure compressive strength of biocemented samples
  • Analyze calcium carbonate precipitation via SEM
  • Assess survival of microbial communities under Martian environmental conditions [53]

Quantitative Data Analysis

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Chroococcidiopsis Strains in Martian Regolith Media

Parameter	CCMEE 010 (FaRLiP)	CCMEE 029 (Non-FaRLiP)	Measurement Method
Growth in Martian Water-Released Minerals	Less growth detriment in turbid medium [52]	Significant growth reduction	Biomass accumulation over 21 days [52]
Biomass Production	Higher accumulation [52]	Lower accumulation	Dry weight measurement [52]
Support for Heterotrophic Bacteria	Promoted greater bacterial growth [52]	Limited support	Growth assessment of bacterial cultures fed with cyanobacterial lysates [52]
Pigment Adaptation	Emission peak related to FaRLiP early phase [52]	Standard emission spectrum	Photosynthetic pigment emission spectrum analysis [52]
Perchlorate Tolerance (2.4 mM)	No pigment bleaching [52]	No pigment bleaching [52]	Visual inspection and pigment analysis [52]

Table 2: Martian Environmental Challenges and Microbial Mitigation Strategies

Environmental Challenge	Impact on Microbial Systems	Proposed Mitigation Strategy
Radiation	DNA damage, reduced viability [53]	Use of radiation-resistant strains (e.g., Chroococcidiopsis); Physical shielding [53]
Low Pressure	Altered metabolic activity [53]	Pressure-controlled bioreactors; Selection of barotolerant species [53]
Temperature Fluctuations	Enzyme activity disruption [53]	Thermal regulation systems; Psychrophilic/thermophilic microbes [53]
Regolith Composition	Perchlorate toxicity; Mineral availability [52]	Perchlorate degradation; Selection of rock-weathering strains [52]
Water Availability	Limited metabolic activity [53]	Water recycling from waste streams; Use of hypolithic communities [53]

Technical Pathways and System Integration

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for Bio-ISRU Experiments

Reagent/Material	Function	Example Application
Martian Regolith Simulants (e.g., JSC Mars-1A, MGS-1)	Mimics chemical and physical properties of Martian soil for experimentation [52]	Cultivation media preparation; Biocementation substrates [52]
Lunar Regolith Simulants	Replicates properties of lunar surface material [3]	Plant growth studies; Microbial weathering experiments [3]
BG-11 Medium	Standardized cyanobacterial growth medium for controls [52]	Baseline comparison for regolith-based media performance [52]
Perchlorate Salts (e.g., Mg(ClO₄)₂, Ca(ClO₄)₂)	Simulates toxic perchlorate compounds present in Martian regolith [52]	Toxicity tolerance assays; Adaptation studies [52]
Urea	Nitrogen source for microbial metabolism [52]	Supplement for regolith-based media; Nitrogen cycle studies [52]
Synthetic Human Urine	Simulates crew waste stream for resource recycling [52]	Nutrient source in closed-loop system experiments [52]
Far-Red Light Sources (680-750 nm)	Provides specific wavelength range for FaRLiP studies [52]	Photosynthetic efficiency experiments under Mars-relevant light conditions [52]

Experimental Workflow for Bio-ISRU Research

Bio-ISRU represents a paradigm shift in space exploration toward self-sufficiency and sustainability. Microbial systems, particularly cyanobacteria capable of oxygenic photosynthesis, offer dual benefits of air revitalization and resource production from local materials. The experimental protocols and data presented provide a foundation for developing robust Bio-ISRU technologies. Future research must address the challenges of microbial viability under extraterrestrial conditions through interdisciplinary approaches integrating synthetic biology, materials science, and planetary engineering. As humanity prepares for sustained presence beyond Earth, Bio-ISRU will play an increasingly critical role in enabling these ambitious endeavors through biologically-based resource cycling and atmospheric management.

For long-duration space missions beyond Low Earth Orbit (BLEO), such as those planned to the Moon and Mars, the paradigm of life support must shift from physico-chemical (PC) systems with regular resupply from Earth to bioregenerative systems that enable self-sufficiency. The current International Space Station (ISS) uses physico-chemical methods for air revitalization, which require regular maintenance and resupply of oxygen from Earth [54]. For missions where resupply is impractical—taking approximately seven months to reach Mars—and communication delays range from 5 to 20 minutes, crewed missions must achieve unprecedented levels of closed-loop sustainability [3].

Integrating air revitalization with food production and waste processing through biological systems presents a viable path toward this goal. These multifunctional systems leverage microbial photosynthesis and other biological processes to create a synergistic cycle: converting astronaut waste and atmospheric carbon dioxide into oxygen, nutritious biomass, and other valuable products. This technical guide explores the core principles, current experimental frameworks, and future directions for these integrated systems, framing them within the broader thesis of using microbial photosynthesis as the cornerstone for sustainable space exploration [3] [55].

Core Principles and System Synergies

The Role of Microbial Photosynthesis

At the heart of multifunctional life support systems are photosynthetic microorganisms, primarily cyanobacteria and algae. These organisms function as primary producers, leveraging light energy to drive the core reactions that support a closed-loop ecosystem.

• Air Revitalization: Cyanobacteria consume carbon dioxide (CO₂) produced by crew respiration and, through photosynthesis, produce oxygen (O₂). This provides a continuous method for atmosphere revitalization [3] [55].
• Food Production: The biomass generated by these microorganisms can serve as a direct food source or as a nutrient-rich feedstock for other organisms, including plants or fungi, within the system [55].
• Waste Processing: Microbial communities can be engineered to utilize organic waste streams, such as inedible plant biomass or human waste, as nutrient sources. This process effectively recycles waste into forms usable by the primary producers, closing the resource loop [3].

This creates a Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS), where biological processes regenerate essential resources for human survival. The European Space Agency's Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) is a prominent example, using a loop of compartments where microorganisms and plants purify air, produce food, and recycle waste [3].

System Architecture and Mass Flow

The efficiency of a multifunctional system hinges on the precise engineering of mass flow between its components. The following diagram illustrates the core logical relationships and material flows within an idealized system centered on microbial photosynthesis.

Key Biological Agents and Experimental Platforms

Candidate Microorganisms and Their Functions

The selection of biological agents is critical for system efficiency and resilience. A single organism is unlikely to serve all purposes, leading to strategies involving defined consortia or synthetically engineered chassis organisms [55]. The table below summarizes the primary candidate organisms and their proposed functions within a multifunctional system.

Table 1: Key Microorganisms for Multifunctional Life Support Systems

Organism Type	Example Species	Primary Function(s)	Relevant Metabolic Process	Mission Relevance
Cyanobacteria	Anabaena sp. PCC 7938	O₂ production, bio-ISRU, food	Photosynthesis, N₂-fixation	Can grow on simulated Martian atmosphere (96% N₂, 4% CO₂) [55].
Cyanobacteria	Chroococcidiopsis	Radiation shielding, O₂ production	Photosynthesis	Extremotolerant; can be engineered for on-demand compound production [55].
Soil Bacteria	Sinorhizobium meliloti	Soil fertility, food production	Nitrogen-fixation	Increases plant growth in simulated regolith [3].
Soil Bacteria	Bacillus subtilis	Biomanufacturing	Various	Forms resistant spores; withstands space conditions; GRAS status [55].
Algae	Chlorella / Spirulina	O₂ production, food source	Photosynthesis	High biomass yield; direct nutritional supplement.
Fungi / Yeast	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Nutrient production, waste recycling	Fermentation	Genetically engineered to produce vitamins on-demand [45].

In-Situ Resource Utilization (Bio-ISRU)

A key advantage of microbial systems is their ability to leverage local resources, dramatically reducing launch mass and cost. This approach, known as Biological In-Situ Resource Utilization (bio-ISRU), is a cornerstone for sustainable off-world outposts [3] [55].

• Atmospheric Utilization: Cyanobacteria like Anabaena sp. can directly utilize the thin, CO₂-rich Martian atmosphere (~96% N₂, ~4% CO₂) for growth, producing oxygen and organic biomass [55].
• Regolith Processing: Lunar and Martian regolith (soil) can be used as a growth medium for plants. However, regolith lacks reactive nitrogen. Introducing nitrogen-fixing bacteria, such as Sinorhizobium meliloti, has been shown to significantly improve plant growth (e.g., clover) in simulated Martian regolith by converting atmospheric nitrogen into usable forms [3].
• Waste Stream Integration: The nitrogen and other nutrients present in crew urine can be used as a fertilizer for cyanobacterial or plant growth, closing the nutrient loop [55].

Quantitative Analysis and Performance Metrics

Mass Savings and System Efficiency

Adopting bioregenerative systems over traditional physico-chemical approaches or full resupply from Earth results in significant mass savings, a critical parameter for mission feasibility. Synthetic biology approaches can achieve mass savings of 26–85% depending on the application compared to conventional abiotic means [55].

Table 2: Payload Mass Requirements for a 6-Person, 3-Year Mars Mission

Consumable	Mass per Crew Member (kg)	Total Mass for 6 Crew (kg)	Notes & Assumptions
Packaged Food	1,359	~26,000	Based on 30-month mission data; mass increases vehicle payload significantly [55].
Water	2,250	~13,500	Does not include water recycling; mass is prohibitive without recycling [55].
O₂ (PC System)	N/A	Requires resupply	Current ISS systems are not fully closed; require O₂ resupply from Earth [54].
Integrated BLSS	Varies	Mass reduced by 26-85%	Mass includes initial bioreactor hardware and organisms. Savings from recycling and in-situ production [55].

The mass of a BLSS is largely attributed to the initial hardware. In contrast, the mass of consumables for a purely resupply-based mission scales linearly with crew size and mission duration, quickly becoming untenable for long-duration missions. The high cost of launching mass to Mars, on the order of \$300,000 per kilogram, makes these savings a primary driver for biological system development [55].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Protocol 1: Establishing a Photoautotrophic Bioreactor for O₂ Production and Biomass

This protocol outlines the steps for creating a foundational cyanobacteria bioreactor for air revitalization and food production.

• Objective: To cultivate cyanobacteria for continuous CO₂ sequestration, O₂ production, and biomass generation in a simulated space habitat.
• Principle: Cyanobacteria use light energy to convert CO₂ and water into biomass and oxygen via photosynthesis.

Materials (Research Reagent Solutions):

• Cyanobacterial Strain: Anabaena sp. PCC 7938, selected for its ability to grow under a low-pressure, high-N₂, high-CO₂ atmosphere [55].
• Growth Medium: BG-11 medium, a standard for cyanobacterial cultivation.
• Bioreactor: A sealed, illuminated vessel with gas-inlet and -outlet ports, and a harvesting system.
• Gas Mixture: 96% N₂, 4% CO₂ at a total pressure of 100 hPa to simulate a Martian-like atmosphere [55].
• Light Source: Full-spectrum LEDs with adjustable intensity.
• Analytical Equipment: Mass spectrometer for monitoring inlet/outlet O₂ and CO₂ concentrations [56].

Procedure:

• Inoculation: Aseptically introduce the Anabaena inoculum into the bioreactor containing sterile BG-11 medium.
• Environmental Control: Flush the reactor headspace with the N₂/CO₂ gas mixture. Maintain a constant temperature of 25-30°C and continuous light illumination.
• Monitoring and Data Collection:
  • Daily, measure the optical density at 680 nm (OD₆₈₀) to track culture density.
  • Use the mass spectrometer to continuously or periodically log the CO₂ and O₂ levels in the effluent gas stream.
• Harvesting: Once the culture reaches the stationary growth phase, initiate a continuous harvest system, removing a portion of the biomass for downstream processing (e.g., nutritional analysis) and replacing it with fresh medium.

Protocol 2: Testing Plant-Microbe Interactions in Simulated Regolith

This protocol assesses the enhancement of plant growth in non-terrestrial soils using microbial partners, contributing to the food production module.

• Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in improving the fertility of simulated Martian regolith for crop cultivation.
• Principle: Rhizobia bacteria form a symbiotic relationship with legume plants, fixing atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, which the plant can use.

Materials (Research Reagent Solutions):

• Plant Material: Clover (Melilotus officinalis) seeds, a model legume [3].
• Bacterial Inoculant: Sinorhizobium meliloti culture [3].
• Growth Substrate: Simulated Martian regolith.
• Growth Chambers: Controlled environment chambers (e.g., NASA's Advanced Plant Habitat or Veggie system analogs) [3].
• Analysis Tools: Mass balance, elemental analyzer for measuring nitrogen content.

Procedure:

• Experimental Setup:
  • Treatment Group: Plant clover seeds in simulated regolith inoculated with S. meliloti.
  • Control Group: Plant clover seeds in the same regolith without bacterial inoculation.
• Cultivation: Grow plants in the controlled environment chambers for three months. Maintain consistent light cycles, temperature, and humidity. Provide water and essential nutrients besides nitrogen.
• Data Collection:
  • At the end of the growth period, carefully harvest the plants.
  • Measure the fresh and dry biomass of the shoots and roots for both groups.
  • Analyze the nitrogen content of the plant tissue and the surrounding regolith using an elemental analyzer.
• Analysis: Compare the biomass yield and nitrogen assimilation between the treatment and control groups. A statistically significant increase in the inoculated group demonstrates successful bio-fertilization.

The workflow for developing and validating such a bio-ISRU system for plant cultivation involves multiple stages, from preparation to data analysis, as shown in the following diagram.

Current Research and Technology Gaps

Active Research Initiatives

NASA and international partners are actively conducting research to advance the technology readiness level (TRL) of BLSS components.

• Advanced Plant Habitat (APH) & Veggie: NASA's experiments on the ISS study plant growth in microgravity, providing critical data on plant-microbe interactions and crop yield. Successfully grown crops include lettuce, Chinese cabbage, and zinnia flowers [3] [45].
• Genetic Engineering for Nutrient Production: Research is underway to use genetically engineered yeast to produce essential nutrients on-demand during space missions, countering vitamin deficiencies [45].
• Bio-ISRU Prototyping: Experiments are testing the cultivation of cyanobacteria using simulated Martian atmospheres and regolith, proving the fundamental feasibility of the approach [55].

Identified Challenges and Risks

Despite promising advances, several challenges must be mitigated before full-scale implementation.

• Microbial Pathogenicity and Contamination: Closed systems are vulnerable to microbial adaptation and the proliferation of pathogens. For example, the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum caused root rot in Zinnia plants grown in the ISS Veggie system, highlighting the risk to food production [3].
• System Stability and Reliability: Biological systems are dynamic and less predictable than physico-chemical systems. Ensuring the long-term stability of microbial consortia and plant health over multi-year missions is a significant challenge.
• Resource Optimization: Balancing the power, volume, and mass requirements of a robust BLSS against the savings it provides remains a complex engineering problem.
• Microgravity Effects: Understanding and mitigating the effects of microgravity and partial gravity on fluid dynamics, gas exchange, and microbial physiology is critical for system design [3].

Overcoming Extraterrestrial Challenges: Microbial Adaptation and System Stability

The microgravity environment of spaceflight presents a unique set of physical conditions that fundamentally alter fluid behavior and consequently impact microbial physiology. Microgravity is characterized by significant reductions in fluid shear and the near-absence of buoyancy-driven convection, creating a low-shear, quiescent fluid environment [57]. This shift in mechanical forces represents a critical environmental stimulus to which microorganisms must adapt for survival. The process by which cells sense and respond to these mechanical stimuli, known as mechanotransduction, is increasingly recognized as a vital regulator of microbial gene expression, physiology, and pathogenesis [57]. While terrestrial life evolved with constant gravitational forces, spaceflight research reveals that microbes are "hardwired" to respond to changes in this fundamental physical force, though the precise molecular mechanisms remain undefined [57]. Understanding these adaptive processes is crucial for advancing bioregenerative life support systems (BLSS) that utilize microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization in long-duration space missions [3] [35].

Fundamental Alterations to Gas-Liquid Transfer Processes

In terrestrial conditions, gravity-driven processes dominate gas-liquid interfaces. Buoyancy forces cause gas bubbles to rise and liquid phases to separate, creating natural convection patterns that enhance mixing and gas transfer. In microgravity, these buoyant forces are virtually eliminated, leading to several critical changes in transport phenomena.

The primary alterations to gas-liquid transfer in microgravity include:

• Elimination of buoyancy-driven convection, resulting in purely diffusion-dominated environments
• Reduced fluid shear stresses at gas-liquid interfaces
• Altered bubble and drop dynamics, including coalescence and detachment behavior
• Formation of stagnant boundary layers around microbial cells
• Diminished gas exchange efficiency due to the absence of free convection

The absence of natural convection in microgravity means that microbial cells rapidly deplete nutrients and accumulate waste products in their immediate vicinity, creating a localized microenvironment that differs substantially from the bulk fluid [58]. This quiescent environment has profound implications for the design of space-based photobioreactors intended for air revitalization, as current terrestrial systems often rely implicitly on gravity-dependent processes [35].

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Gas-Liquid Transfer Processes in Terrestrial vs. Microgravity Environments

Parameter	Terrestrial Environment (1g)	Microgravity Environment (μg)
Dominant Transport Mechanism	Convection and diffusion	Diffusion-dominated
Fluid Shear Stress	Moderate to high	Significantly reduced
Bubble Behavior	Buoyant rise and coalescence	Random motion, prolonged residence
Boundary Layer Characteristics	Thin, constantly refreshed	Thick, stagnant
Mixing Efficiency	High	Low
Oxygen Transfer Rates	Enhanced by natural convection	Limited by diffusion

Impacts on Microbial Physiology and Behavior

Microorganisms exhibit significant physiological and behavioral adaptations when cultured in microgravity and associated low-fluid-shear environments. These responses are not uniform across species but represent consistent patterns of adaptation to the unique mechanical forces present in spaceflight.

Growth Dynamics and Metabolism

Research conducted with Escherichia coli in ground-based analogues of space bioreactors has demonstrated that microbial growth rates increase logarithmically with increasing fluid mixing, with significantly reduced growth observed under static (low-shear) conditions [59]. The average growth rate for E. coli in static culture was only 0.07 OD₆₀₀/h, reaching just ~13% of the endpoint growth achieved under standard laboratory growth conditions with vigorous mixing [59]. This suggests that the limited nutrient availability in diffusion-dominated microgravity environments directly constrains metabolic activity. Similar studies with microalgae have shown that microgravity or simulated microgravity can induce important physiological changes, including altered growth characteristics, greater reactive oxygen production during photosynthesis, and reduced photosynthetic capacity [58].

Genetic Regulation and Virulence

Microgravity has been shown to globally regulate microbial gene expression, though the mechanotransduction pathways responsible for this regulation remain incompletely characterized [57]. Evidence suggests that cross-talk exists between microbial signal transduction systems, potentially revealing common mechanotransduction themes used to sense and respond to low-shear stress and changes in gravitational forces [57]. Some pathogenic bacteria have demonstrated enhanced virulence in spaceflight conditions, which is particularly concerning given that spaceflight also negatively impacts immune function in both humans and animals [57]. This combination presents increased risks of infectious disease during space missions that must be addressed through both microbial control and countermeasure development.

Cell Surface and Interface Interactions

The absence of sedimentation in microgravity significantly alters how microbial cells interact with surfaces and interfaces. Microbes exhibit increased adhesion and altered biofilm formation under low-shear conditions [59]. The RSD bioreactor concept leverages surface tension for containment in microgravity, creating a system where interfacial hydrodynamics play a dominant role in microbial mixing and gas exchange [59]. Furthermore, the distribution of cells within bioreactors changes substantially in low-shear environments, with distinct patterning observed at different Reynolds numbers that does not occur in well-mixed terrestrial systems [59].

Table 2: Documented Physiological Responses of Microorganisms to Microgravity and Low-Shear Environments

Microorganism	Observed Physiological Response	Experimental Platform
Escherichia coli	Altered growth rates; Changed recombinant protein expression; Patterned cell distribution	Knife Edge Viscometer (KEV) [59]
Salmonella typhimurium	Increased growth rate; Higher cell densities	Spaceflight experiments [58]
Bacillus subtilis	Altered growth characteristics	Spaceflight experiments [58]
Microalgae (various species)	Reduced photosynthetic capacity; Increased reactive oxygen production; Altered growth patterns	Spacecraft experiments [58]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Slower growth in space	PharmaSat [58]

Experimental Methodologies for Investigating Microgravity Effects

Ground-Based Microgravity Analogues

Several ground-based systems have been developed to simulate aspects of the microgravity environment, each with specific applications and limitations for studying microbial responses:

Rotating Wall Vessels (RWV) simulate microgravity by maintaining cells in a constant state of free-fall within a rotating fluid field, creating a low-fluid-shear environment [57]. These systems have been widely used to study microbial pathogenesis and physiological responses to low-shear conditions, though they cannot fully replicate the absence of gravity sedimentation [57].

Knife Edge Viscometer (KEV) serves as a ground-based analog for the Ring-Sheared Drop (RSD) space bioreactor, utilizing interfacially-driven flow for mixing rather than conventional stirring [59]. The KEV supports microbial growth through surface shear viscosity that results in secondary flow effects, providing a platform to study microbial responses to interfacial hydrodynamics [59].

Microfluidic Platforms like the GraviSat prototype incorporate miniature cultivation systems (120 μL wells) within rotating discs that can generate a range of artificial gravity levels [58]. These systems enable replicated experiments with integrated optical and electrochemical sensors for monitoring photosynthetic efficiency, pH, dissolved oxygen, and dissolved inorganic carbon dioxide [58].

Spaceflight Experimentation

Spaceflight experiments present unique technical challenges, including limitations in power, work area, mass, and crew time [57]. Safety requirements for crew in closed environments necessitate multiple containment of growing microbial cultures, and the lack of gravity complicates techniques requiring proper gas/liquid/solid-phase separation [57]. Despite these constraints, several successful platforms have been implemented:

The Ring-Sheared Drop (RSD) is a space-specific bioreactor that uses surface tension for containment rather than solid walls, creating a containerless liquid media system that provides sufficient mixing and abundant opportunity for gas exchange [59]. The RSD offers several advantages: scalability (from <1 mL to 1000 mL), no barriers to gas exchange, no solid walls that can be fouled, energy-efficient mixing, and low reactor weight [59].

Nanosatellites like GraviSat provide autonomous platforms for long-duration (3-12 months) space experiments with appropriate replication and controls [58]. These systems can incorporate both spinning and stationary culture discs to provide onboard microgravity and artificial gravity controls within the same pressure vessel, addressing critical roadblocks to interpretation of microbiological space experiments [58].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Microgravity Microbiology Studies

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Experimental Considerations
Chlorella vulgaris UTEX 29	Model microalga for photosynthesis studies	Compatible with nanosatellite materials; prolonged growth >10 months achieved with controlled conditions [58]
Dunaliella bardawil 30 861	Halophilic microalga for BLSS applications	Reduced bubble formation at low light intensities (2-10 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) and temperatures (4-12°C) [58]
Escherichia coli	Model bacterium for growth and recombinant protein studies	Demonstrates logarithmic growth increase with rotation rate in KEV; shows altered endpoint distribution patterns [59]
Pulse-Amplitude Modulated (PAM) Fluorometry	Non-invasive measurement of photosynthetic efficiency	Enables real-time assessment of photosynthesis in orbit; measurements possible every few seconds [58]
Ion-Sensitive Microelectrodes	Monitoring pH, dissolved O₂, dissolved CO₂	Integrated into microfluidic disc wells; bubble formation can interfere with measurements [58]
Microfluidic Polymer Disc	Cultivation platform for replicated space experiments	Contains 120 μL wells around circumference; requires careful material biocompatibility testing [58]

Implications for Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) and Air Revitalization

The integration of microbial photosynthesis into BLSS for air revitalization represents a promising solution for long-duration space missions, but must account for the fundamental alterations to gas-liquid transfer and microbial physiology in microgravity.

Photobioreactor Design Considerations

Current physicochemical life support systems on the International Space Station include a Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA), and Carbon Dioxide Reduction Assembly (CRA) [35]. These systems rely on regenerable absorbent materials, water electrolysis, and the Sabatier reaction, but result in substantial loss of carbon and other elements over time [35]. Photosynthetic biological systems using algae and cyanobacteria offer potential solutions for air revitalization and carbon recycling coupled to production of edible biomass [35]. However, gas-liquid transfer phenomena are different under microgravity conditions, which inevitably affects the cultivation process and oxygen production [35]. The RSD bioreactor addresses these challenges by using surface tension rather than solid walls for containment, providing abundant free surface area for gas exchange without fouling-prone membranes [59].

Microbial Selection and Optimization

Successful implementation of BLSS requires careful microbial selection based on performance in space-relevant conditions. Screening of more than twenty microalgal strains for the GraviSat platform identified specific physical, metabolic and biochemical attributes necessary for prolonged growth in microfluidic systems, including hardware biocompatibility, controlled gas production to prevent bubble interference, and capacity for reversible metabolic stasis for pre-launch storage [58]. Optimal strains such as Chlorella vulgaris and Dunaliella bardawil enabled prolonged growth periods exceeding ten months without excess oxygen production when cultured under appropriate light and temperature conditions [58].

Future Research Directions and Knowledge Gaps

Despite significant progress, critical knowledge gaps remain in understanding and harnessing microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization in space. Future research priorities include:

• Elucidating mechanotransduction mechanisms by which microbial cells perceive and respond to microgravity and low-shear stress at the molecular level [57]
• Quantifying gas transfer coefficients in microgravity conditions to enable predictive modeling and scaling of photobioreactors [35]
• Developing anti-fouling strategies for membranes and surfaces in BLSS, as biofouling can reduce nutrient flux by up to one-third and light transmittance by over half [59]
• Optimizing strain performance through both selection and genetic engineering to enhance productivity and resilience in space conditions [3]
• Integrating biological and physicochemical systems to create robust hybrid life support systems with redundant capabilities [35] [6]

The study of microbial responses to microgravity not only advances space exploration capabilities but also provides fundamental insights into mechanobiology with potential applications in medicine and biotechnology on Earth. As research continues, the integration of microbial-based air revitalization systems will be essential for achieving the self-sufficiency required for long-duration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond [3] [6].

Biofilm Management and Contamination Control in Closed-Loop Systems

In the context of space exploration, bioregenerative life support systems (BLSS) are essential for maintaining crew health during long-duration missions beyond low Earth orbit. These systems rely on microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization – the process of removing toxic carbon dioxide and producing oxygen through photosynthetic microorganisms in photobioreactors (PBRs) [35]. However, the same aqueous environments that support these beneficial microbes also create ideal conditions for problematic biofilm formation, which can compromise system integrity and crew safety.

Biofilms are dense, slimy layers of microbial colonies that form on surfaces exposed to water over time. They consist of complex microbial communities embedded in a protective matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [60]. In closed-loop systems aboard spacecraft or extraterrestrial habitats, biofilm formation poses significant risks to both mechanical systems and human health, particularly through the harboring of pathogens such as Legionella pneumophila [60] [61]. Effective biofilm management is therefore crucial for ensuring the reliability of microbial photosynthesis systems essential for long-duration space missions.

Biofilm Formation and Risks in Closed-Loop Systems

The Biofilm Lifecycle

Biofilm development follows a predictable five-stage process:

• Initial Attachment: Free-floating (planktonic) bacteria loosely adhere to surfaces through van der Waals forces or weak electrostatic interactions [60].
• Irreversible Adhesion: Cells secrete EPS, creating a sticky matrix that strengthens surface bonds [60].
• Colonization: Additional microbes join the structure, creating a complex community that begins nutrient exchange and chemical signaling [60].
• Maturation: The biofilm thickens, develops internal channels, and becomes increasingly resistant to disinfection [60].
• Dispersion: Clumps detach and travel downstream to colonize new surfaces, repeating the cycle throughout the system [60].

The EPS matrix provides crucial protective functions, shielding microbes from oxidizing agents like chlorine, buffering against pH and temperature changes, and physically blocking disinfectant penetration [60].

Risk Zones in Water Systems

Biofilms preferentially colonize specific areas within closed-loop systems. The table below outlines common biofilm locations aligned with known risk zones for pathogen growth:

Table 1: High-Risk Locations for Biofilm Formation in Water Systems [60]

System Type	Common Biofilm Locations
Potable Water Systems	Storage tanks, dead legs, aerators, showerheads
Hot Water Recirculation	Return loops, tank inlets/outlets, mixing valves
Cooling Towers	Fill media, basin surfaces, distribution decks
Humidifiers	Reservoirs, wetted media, distribution pipes
Healthcare Facilities	Decorative fountains, whirlpools, point-of-use taps

Impacts on System Performance and Crew Health

Biofilm accumulation in closed-loop systems creates multiple operational challenges:

• Persistent microbiological problems: Biofilm layers protect underlying bacteria from biocides, causing system recontamination after biocide depletion [61].
• Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC): Biofilms can induce localized corrosion and pitting, estimated to cause 20% of all corrosion in fluid transfer systems [61].
• Increased energy consumption: Biofilm increases friction resistance, requiring more energy for circulating pumps [61].
• Heat transfer problems: Biofilm has four-times greater insulating power than calcium carbonate scale of equal thickness, reducing heat exchange efficiency [61].
• Pathogen harborage: Biofilms provide ideal environments for pathogens like Legionella bacteria, which prefer the sub-atmospheric oxygen levels found beneath biofilm layers [61].

In space applications, these issues are particularly concerning given the limited resupply options and the critical nature of life support systems for crew safety.

Quantitative Biofilm Assessment Methodologies

Effective biofilm management requires reliable assessment methods. The following protocols provide standardized approaches for quantifying biofilm formation and evaluating control strategies.

Microtiter Plate Biofilm Assay

The microtiter plate assay is a high-throughput method for monitoring microbial attachment to abiotic surfaces, suitable for screening multiple bacterial strains or treatment conditions [62].

Table 2: Microtiter Plate Assay Conditions for Common Bacteria [62]

Organism	Incubation Temperature (°C)	Recommended Solvent for Stain Elution
Pseudomonas aeruginosa	25–37	95% ethanol or 30% acetic acid
Escherichia coli	25	80% ethanol/20% acetone
Staphylococcus aureus	37	33% glacial acetic acid
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	28	100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Vibrio cholerae	25–30	100% DMSO

Experimental Protocol [62]:

• Inoculation: Dilute stationary phase cultures 1:100 in desired media. Pipette 100 μL of each diluted culture into multiple wells of a non-tissue-culture-treated 96-well microtiter plate.
• Incubation: Cover plates and incubate at optimal growth temperature for desired duration (typically 24-48 hours).
• Planktonic cell removal: Briskly shake dish over waste tray to remove planktonic bacteria. Submerge plate in water tray and vigorously shake out liquid. Repeat with fresh water.
• Staining: Add 125 μL of 0.1% crystal violet solution to each well. Stain for 10 minutes at room temperature.
• Washing: Shake out crystal violet solution and wash dishes successively in two water trays, shaking out excess liquid after each wash.
• Drying: Invert microtiter dish and tap on paper towels to remove excess liquid. Air-dry plates.
• Solubilization: Add 200 μL of appropriate solvent (see Table 2) to each stained well. Cover plates and incubate 10-15 minutes at room temperature to solubilize dye.
• Quantification: Transfer 125 μL of solubilized crystal violet solution to an optically clear flat-bottom 96-well plate. Measure optical density at 500-600 nm.

This protocol allows semiquantitative assessment of biofilm formation with comparison between treatment conditions or bacterial strains.

Colony Forming Unit (CFU) Enumeration

CFU enumeration determines viable cell numbers through direct plating, providing information on bactericidal effects of anti-biofilm treatments.

Experimental Protocol [63]:

• Biofilm collection: Suspend mature biofilm in liquid medium via scraping, vortexing, or sonicating.
• Homogenization: Homogenize the suspended biofilm using a commercial homogenizer to disperse cells.
• Serial dilution: Aseptically remove aliquots and perform serial dilutions in sterile liquid medium.
• Plating: Plate diluted samples onto nutrient-containing agar plates.
• Incubation: Incubate plates for 24-72 hours at appropriate temperature.
• Enumeration: Count colonies on plates with 30-300 colonies. Calculate original cell concentration using the formula: CFU/mL = (number of colonies × dilution factor) / volume plated

For small biofilm quantities, suspended samples can be cultured in liquid medium with shaking to expand cell numbers before plating, though this may alter species ratios in mixed cultures [63].

Advanced Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

Table 3: Biofilm Assessment Methods and Applications [63]

Method	Principle	Application in Biofilm Research
ATP Bioluminescence	Measures ATP from metabolically active cells	Rapid assessment of viable biomass
Quartz Crystal Microbalance	Detects mass changes on sensor surfaces	Real-time monitoring of biofilm accumulation
Scanning Electron Microscopy	High-resolution imaging of dehydrated samples	Detailed visualization of biofilm ultrastructure
Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy	Optical sectioning of fluorescently labeled samples	3D reconstruction of living biofilm architecture
Contact Plates/Dipslides	Direct impression sampling with culture media	Field-friendly biofilm monitoring in industrial systems

Biofilm Assessment Method Selection

Biofilm Control Strategies for Closed-Loop Systems

Operating Parameters for Biofilm Prevention

Environmental conditions significantly influence biofilm growth potential. The table below outlines key risk factors and their management in closed-loop systems:

Table 4: Biofilm Risk Factors and Control Parameters [60] [61]

Risk Factor	Impact on Biofilm Formation	Control Recommendations
Stagnant water flow	Prevents mechanical scouring; allows attachment	Maintain flow >1 ft/sec; eliminate dead legs
Temperature (77–113°F/25–45°C)	Optimal for microbial growth and EPS production	Maintain outside growth range where possible
Organic matter	Provides nutrient source for microbial growth	Implement filtration; maintain biocide residuals
Rough or corroded pipes	Increases surface area for bacterial attachment	Use smooth surfaces; prevent corrosion
Bacterial count >10,000 cfu/mL	Indicates significant biofilm development potential	Maintain below threshold with biocides [61]

Integrated Control Approach

Effective biofilm management requires a multi-faceted strategy combining physical, chemical, and operational controls:

• Physical controls: Regular system flushing, mechanical cleaning, and filtration to remove established biofilms and prevent attachment [60].
• Chemical controls: Strategic use of oxidizing and non-oxidizing biocides that can penetrate EPS matrices, combined with dispersants to enhance efficacy [60] [61].
• Operational controls: Continuous monitoring of microbiological parameters, temperature management, and flow velocity maintenance to create suboptimal conditions for biofilm development [60].
• Design considerations: Elimination of dead legs, use of smooth non-porous materials, and proper insulation to prevent condensation and temperature fluctuations [60].

In BLSS utilizing microbial photosynthesis, control strategies must balance biofilm management with preservation of beneficial microorganisms essential for air revitalization. This requires targeted approaches that discriminate between problematic biofilms and productive phototrophic cultures.

Research Tools and Reagent Solutions

Standardized protocols and reagents are essential for reproducible biofilm research. The following toolkit outlines essential materials for conducting biofilm experiments:

Table 5: Research Reagent Solutions for Biofilm Studies [62] [63] [64]

Reagent/Material	Specification	Research Application
Crystal Violet Solution	0.1% (w/v) in water	Staining of adherent biomass in microtiter assays
Solvents for Stain Elution	30% acetic acid, 95% ethanol, or DMSO	Extraction of bound dye for quantification
Non-Tissue-Culture-Treated Plates	Polystyrene, surface-treated for cell adhesion	Biofilm growth substrate for microtiter assays
ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kits	Luciferase-based detection systems	Rapid viability assessment of biofilm cells
Culture Media for Target Organisms	Species-specific formulations	Supporting growth of relevant biofilm formers
Fluorescent Stains (e.g., SYTO 9)	Nucleic acid binding dyes	Viability staining and microscopy visualization
Homogenization Equipment	Mechanical disruptors or sonication devices	Dispersing biofilm aggregates for CFU counting

Standardization of testing protocols is increasingly important for comparing results across studies. Organizations like the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) are developing standards (e.g., ISO 3990 for dental materials) that provide frameworks for sample preparation, strain selection, test methods, and results reporting [64]. Similar standardized approaches are needed for BLSS applications to ensure reliable comparison of biofilm control strategies across different research institutions and space agencies.

Biofilm Control Strategy Logic Flow

Effective biofilm management in closed-loop systems supporting microbial photosynthesis for space applications requires integrated, multifaceted approaches. Understanding the biofilm lifecycle, implementing appropriate assessment methodologies, and applying targeted control strategies are all essential components for maintaining system reliability and crew safety during long-duration missions. As BLSS technologies advance toward implementation in lunar and Martian habitats, standardized protocols for biofilm monitoring and control will be crucial for comparing results across research institutions and space agencies. The continued development of selective control methods that manage problematic biofilms while preserving beneficial photosynthetic microorganisms will enable sustainable air revitalization systems for the future of space exploration.

The establishment of sustainable human presence in space beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) necessitates advanced Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) for air revitalization, water purification, and food production. Microbial photosynthesis, utilizing cyanobacteria and other photosynthetic microorganisms, presents a promising technology for closing the carbon and oxygen loops within these systems. This technical whitepaper provides an in-depth examination of the critical growth parameters—temperature, light, and nutrient balance—for optimizing microbial photosynthetic processes in the context of space research. We synthesize current research, present quantitative data in structured tables, detail experimental protocols, and provide visual workflows to guide researchers and drug development professionals in the engineering of robust, space-ready biological systems.

With plans for crewed missions to the Moon and Mars advancing, environmental control and life support systems must evolve from the current, mostly abiotic systems on the International Space Station (ISS) to more self-sufficient bioregenerative systems [6] [3]. Microbial photosynthesis, performed by organisms like cyanobacteria, offers a versatile platform for air revitalization through carbon dioxide (CO₂) consumption and oxygen (O₂) production, while also providing a potential source of biomass for food, nutrients, and high-value compounds [3] [65].

The fundamental advantage of these microorganisms lies in their high metabolic flexibility, rapid growth rates, and minimal spatial requirements compared to higher plants [65]. However, the success of this technology hinges on the precise optimization of core growth parameters to ensure high efficiency, system resilience, and control over metabolic outputs in the unique and constrained environment of a spacecraft or planetary habitat. This guide addresses the key engineering biology challenges of optimizing temperature regimes, light delivery, and nutrient stoichiometry to maximize the performance of photosynthetic microbes for space applications.

Core Growth Parameters: Quantitative Data and Analysis

Temperature Optimization

Temperature is a critical meteorological determinant of photosynthetic function, altering enzyme kinetics and triggering changes in cellular development [66]. The thermal response of photosynthesis follows a classic unimodal curve, where rates increase to an optimum before declining due to enzyme denaturation and increased respiratory costs.

Table 1: Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation Efficiency of Various Species at Different Temperatures

Organism	Type	Temperature (°C)	Carbon Fixation Rate (μg C/(g FW·h))	Optimal Temperature for Carbon Fixation	Key Finding
Ulva pertusa [67]	Green Macroalga	5	Data Not Specified	25°C	Exhibited broad temperature adaptability (15–25°C).
		10	Data Not Specified
		15	Data Not Specified
		20	Data Not Specified
		25	451.2 ± 21.8
		30	Data Not Specified
Sargassum horneri [67]	Brown Macroalga	5	Data Not Specified	15°C	High temperatures (≥25°C) significantly inhibited photosynthesis.
		10	Data Not Specified
		15	450.3 ± 28.1
		20	Data Not Specified
		25	Data Not Specified
		30	Data Not Specified
Grateloupia turuturu [67]	Red Macroalga	5	Data Not Specified	20°C	Showed relatively low efficiency at high temperatures.
		10	Data Not Specified
		15	Data Not Specified
		20	290.0 ± 20.4
		25	Data Not Specified
		30	Data Not Specified
Synechococcus elongatus (2PE_aroK) [68]	Cyanobacterium	~25-30 (Typical for growth)	N/A (2-PE production measured)	150 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ (Light was primary variable)	Low light optimized product formation; high light boosted biomass but reduced 2-PE yield.

The table demonstrates that optimal temperatures are species-specific. Furthermore, research on phytoplankton suggests that rising temperatures can shift metabolic trade-offs, forcing cells to allocate more resources to stress management (e.g., through increased lipid content) and repair mechanisms, which can reduce the efficiency of carbon fixation [69]. This underscores the need for precise thermal control to minimize metabolic overhead.

Light Delivery and Intensity

Light is the energy source for photosynthesis, and its intensity and spectral quality are paramount for driving CO₂ fixation and directing metabolic pathways. Both the absolute intensity and the metabolic trade-offs at different light levels must be considered.

Table 2: Effect of Light Intensity on Microbial Photosynthesis and Metabolism

Organism	Light Intensity (μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹)	Key Performance Metric	Result	Implication for BLSS
Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 (Engineered) [68]	150	2-Phenylethanol (2-PE) Production	282 mg L⁻¹ (28.7 mg L⁻¹ d⁻¹ productivity)	Low light optimized production of the target high-value compound.
	150	Carbon Allocation to 2-PE	45-50%	Precious fixed carbon is efficiently directed to the desired product.
	500	2-Phenylethanol (2-PE) Production	Reduced	High light boosted biomass but reduced the product synthesis efficiency.
	500	Carbon Allocation to 2-PE	28%	More carbon is diverted to general biomass and maintenance.
Generic Phytoplankton [69]	N/A (Model)	Proteome Allocation	Investment in photosystems and repair proteins increases with stress.	Under high light/heat stress, metabolic output decreases as cells allocate resources to repair.

The data from Synechococcus elongatus highlights a critical concept: light intensity can be used as a tool to steer metabolism towards either biomass production or the synthesis of specific high-value compounds [68]. For a BLSS, this means operational goals (O₂ production vs. pharmaceutical synthesis) will dictate the light regime.

Nutrient Balance and Carbon Uptake

Nutrient balance, particularly the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and the availability of essential elements like phosphorus, governs the growth rate and biochemical composition of photosynthetic microbes. In a closed-loop BLSS, the efficient recycling of nutrients from waste streams is essential.

• Carbon Source: The primary carbon source for photosynthetic microbes is CO₂. The efficiency of its fixation is directly related to the growth parameters detailed above. Alternatively, non-photosynthetic microbial food production can use ethanol derived from electro-catalytically fixed CO₂ as a carbon source, demonstrating a hybrid approach to resource recovery [70].
• Nitrogen Source: Nitrogen is a key component of proteins and nucleic acids. In BLSS, urea derived from recycled crew urine can serve as an effective nitrogen source for cultivating microorganisms like the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can in turn be used to produce single-cell protein [70]. Introducing nitrogen-fixing bacteria can also be a strategy to fertilize plant growth modules using inert regolith, by transforming atmospheric nitrogen into reactive forms (NO₃⁻, NH₄⁺) [3].

Experimental Protocols for System Optimization

Protocol: Quantifying Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation Using Stable Isotopes

This protocol, adapted from marine carbon sequestration studies, is critical for accurately measuring the carbon fixation efficiency of photosynthetic cultures under different growth parameters [67].

1. Objective: To quantitatively determine the photosynthetic carbon fixation rate of a microbial or algal culture using ¹³C as a tracer.

2. Materials:

• Photobioreactor (flat-panel or equivalent) with temperature and light control.
• High-abundance Na₂¹³CO₃ (as the ¹³C tracer).
• Culture of the test organism (e.g., cyanobacteria, microalgae).
• Filtration setup and filters (e.g., GF/F).
• Elemental Analyzer coupled to an Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (EA-IRMS).
• Inorganic carbon analysis system.

3. Methodology:

• Step 1: System Setup. Inoculate the photobioreactor with the test organism and allow it to acclimate under the desired experimental conditions (temperature, light, nutrient levels).
• Step 2: Tracer Introduction. At the start of the experimental run, inject a known quantity of high-abundance Na₂¹³CO₃ into the culture medium to create a ¹³C-enriched dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) pool.
• Step 3: Incubation. Expose the culture to the test conditions for a predetermined period (e.g., several hours), ensuring constant mixing and stable environmental parameters.
• Step 4: Sampling and Filtration. At the end of the incubation, collect a known volume of culture and immediately filter it onto a pre-combusted glass fiber filter. This captures the microbial biomass.
• Step 5: Analysis.
  • Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) and ¹³C/¹²C Ratio: The filters are dried, fumed with acid to remove inorganic carbon, and analyzed via EA-IRMS to determine the total POC and the isotopic ratio (δ¹³C).
  • DIC Concentration: Water samples are taken to measure the total concentration and isotopic composition of the DIC pool at the beginning and end of the incubation.
• Step 6: Calculation. The carbon fixation rate is calculated based on the incorporation of the ¹³C tracer into the POC pool, the specific activity of the ¹³C in the DIC pool, and the incubation time.

Protocol: Post-Harvest Sanitization for Sequential Cropping

For systems integrating higher plants or microbes in a multi-cycle operation, system hygiene is critical for reliability and food safety [71].

1. Objective: To clean and sanitize a soilless growth system (e.g., root module, reservoir) after harvest to enable sequential cropping cycles.

2. Materials:

• 1% Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) solution.
• Heated water bath or system with temperature control.
• qPCR system and reagents for microbial monitoring (e.g., assays for total bacteria/fungi).

3. Methodology:

• Step 1: Post-Harvest Cleaning. Remove all plant biomass and debris from the system. Flush the nutrient delivery system with clean water to dislodge particulates and biofilms.
• Step 2: Heat Sterilization. Subject the root modules and associated hardware to a heat sterilization cycle. A validated protocol is 60°C for 1 hour [71].
• Step 3: Chemical Sanitization. Soak the components in a 1% Hydrogen Peroxide solution for 12 hours [71]. This combination of thermal and chemical treatment ensures effective reduction of microbial load.
• Step 4: Rinsing. Rinse the system thoroughly with sterile water to remove any residual sanitizing agents that could inhibit the next crop.
• Step 5: Microbial Verification. Swab critical surfaces (reservoirs, root modules) and use a qPCR-based inflight microbial monitoring protocol to verify the cleanliness of the system in near real-time before initiating the next crop cycle [71].

Visualization of Pathways and Workflows

BLSS Compartment Integration and Metabolic Flows

The following diagram illustrates the interconnected compartments of a Bioregenerative Life Support System, highlighting the central role of microbial photosynthesis in resource recovery [6] [3].

Experimental Workflow for Growth Parameter Optimization

This workflow outlines the systematic process for testing and validating the effects of temperature, light, and nutrients on microbial photosynthesis.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Microbial Photosynthesis Research

Item	Function/Application	Example Use Case
Na₂¹³CO₃ (Sodium Carbonate, ¹³C) [67]	Stable isotope tracer for precise quantification of carbon fixation rates.	Measuring photosynthetic carbon sequestration capacity in macroalgae or cyanobacteria under different temperatures.
Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 [68]	A model, genetically tractable cyanobacterium for metabolic engineering.	Engineering and optimizing strains for production of high-value compounds (e.g., 2-phenylethanol) under controlled light.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae VITF1 [70]	Vitamin-prototrophic yeast for single-cell protein production.	Producing food from ethanol in a minimal medium, uncoupling food production from photosynthesis in a BLSS.
Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) [71]	Sanitizing agent for cleaning life support system components.	Post-harvest sanitization of root modules and nutrient delivery systems to enable sequential crop cycles.
Flat-Panel Photobioreactor [68]	Cultivation vessel with high surface-to-volume ratio for precise light delivery.	Studying the effect of light intensity on growth and product formation in photosynthetic microbes.
qPCR System [71]	Culture-independent microbial monitoring.	Near real-time verification of system cleanliness and food safety for space crop production systems.

The optimization of temperature, light, and nutrient parameters is not merely an exercise in increasing microbial growth yield. It is a fundamental requirement for engineering the predictable and efficient bioregenerative life support systems that will sustain humanity in deep space. By applying the quantitative data, detailed protocols, and analytical frameworks presented in this whitepaper, researchers can advance the development of microbial photosynthesis from a supporting technology to a cornerstone of long-duration space exploration, enabling robust air revitalization and resource recovery. The integration of these optimized biological systems will be critical for achieving the self-sufficiency required for the establishment of a sustained presence on the Moon and the first human missions to Mars.

The success of long-duration human space missions hinges on the development of robust, self-sustaining life support systems. Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are critical for maintaining crew health by regenerating air, purifying water, and producing food, thereby reducing reliance on costly resupply missions from Earth [3]. A promising multifunctional approach within BLSS involves using microbial photosynthesis for simultaneous air revitalization—the removal of carbon dioxide and production of oxygen—and thermal control of the spacecraft cabin [72].

This technical guide explores the application of psychrotolerant microbial species as optimal catalysts for photosynthesis within the dynamic thermal environments of a crewed habitat. Using water-based algal media as a cabin heat sink exposes the microorganisms to a fluctuating, often low-temperature environment reflective of spacecraft thermal control loops [72]. This document provides a comprehensive analysis of suitable species, detailed experimental methodologies, and quantitative performance data to inform the design and implementation of these advanced biological systems for space exploration.

Candidate Psychrotolerant Species for Space Applications

The selection of appropriate microorganisms is paramount for system stability and efficiency. The following species have demonstrated high potential for integration into space-based, thermally dynamic photobioreactors.

Table 1: Candidate Psychrotolerant Species for Dynamic Thermal Environments

Species / Group	Origin / Isolation Source	Optimal / Tolerated Temperature Range	Key Functional Attributes	Relevance to Space BLSS
Antarctic Chlorophyta [72]	McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica (Planetary Analog)	4°C to 14°C [72]	High photosynthetic efficiency at low temperatures; eurythermic (wide temperature tolerance) [72]	Air revitalization and thermal control in cold, dynamic loops [72]
Chlorella vulgaris (Temperate Strains) [72]	Global, temperate climates	9°C to 27°C [72]; Broader optimal range of ~26-36°C [72]	Rapid growth; well-established genetic tools; edible biomass [72]	Proven air revitalization capability; can acclimate to dynamic temperatures [72]
Mucor racemosus AH1 [73]	Dung samples, Egyptian ecosystem	Psychrotolerant; highest unsaturated fatty acid production at 10-20°C [73]	Oleaginous (lipid-accumulating); produces high-value unsaturated fatty acids [73]	Source of nutrients and pharmaceuticals; application in bioremediation [73]
Novel Actinomycetota & Bacillota [74]	NASA Phoenix mission spacecraft assembly cleanrooms	Psychrotolerant (isolated at 4°C) [74]	Extremotolerant; resistant to desiccation, cleaning reagents; produces bioactive compounds [74]	Contamination control; source of novel biomolecules for in-situ resource utilization [74]

Experimental Protocols for Evaluating Performance

To validate the functionality of candidate species for space applications, standardized experimental protocols are essential. The following section details key methodologies for simulating space-relevant conditions and measuring critical performance metrics.

Protocol: Simulating Spacecraft Thermal Loop Conditions

This protocol is designed to assess microbial oxygen production under thermally dynamic conditions that mirror those found in spacecraft internal thermal control systems [72].

• Objective: To determine the impact of a cycled temperature environment on the oxygen provision capability of psychrotolerant versus temperate microalgae.
• Equipment Requirements:
  • Temperature-controlled photobioreactor or incubator with rapid cycling capability
  • Dissolved oxygen probes and data logging system
  • Light source providing consistent photosynthetic photon flux density
  • Sterile growth media (e.g., BG-11 for cyanobacteria/algae)
• Methodology:
  • Inoculation and Pre-conditioning: Inoculate the photobioreactor with the test organism (e.g., Chlorella vulgaris or Antarctic Chlorophyta) and allow it to reach exponential growth phase under a constant, mild temperature (e.g., 10°C) [72].
  • Application of Temperature Cycles: Expose the culture to repeated, short-duration temperature cycles.
    • For temperate C. vulgaris: Cycle between 9°C and 27°C with a period of 28 minutes [72].
    • For Antarctic Chlorophyta: Cycle between 4°C and 14°C with a period of 28 minutes [72].
    • Maintain a constant control group at a steady temperature (e.g., 10°C) for comparison [72].
  • Monitoring and Sampling:
    • Continuously log dissolved oxygen concentrations.
    • Periodically sample the culture for dry biomass measurements.
    • Measure chlorophyll fluorometry (Fv/Fm) as an indicator of photosynthetic health and stress [72].
• Data Analysis: Calculate oxygen production rates normalized by both culture volume (mg O₂ L⁻¹) and biomass dry weight. Compare the rates and Fv/Fm values between the cycled and steady-state conditions to assess acclimation and stress [72].

Protocol: Assessing Photosynthetic Health via Chlorophyll Fluorometry

Chlorophyll fluorometry is a non-invasive, powerful tool for probing the physiological state of the photosynthetic apparatus, particularly under stress.

• Objective: To evaluate the photosynthetic efficiency and potential temperature-induced stress in microbial cultures.
• Equipment: Pulse-Amplitude-Modulated (PAM) fluorometer.
• Methodology:
  • Dark-adapt a sample aliquot for at least 15 minutes to ensure all reaction centers are open.
  • Apply a measuring light to determine the initial fluorescence (F₀).
  • Apply a saturating pulse of light to close all reaction centers and measure the maximum fluorescence (Fm).
  • Calculate the maximum quantum yield of Photosystem II as Fv/Fm = (Fm - F₀) / Fm [72].
• Interpretation: An Fv/Fm value of ~0.6-0.75 indicates a healthy, non-stressed culture. A significant reduction in this ratio signifies environmental stress impairing photosynthesis [72].

The workflow for a comprehensive experiment integrating these protocols is visualized below.

Performance Data and Analysis

Rigorous experimentation under simulated spaceflight conditions has yielded critical quantitative data on species performance.

Table 2: Oxygen Production Performance under Dynamic Temperature Conditions

Species / Condition	Initial O₂ Production Rate (mg O₂ L⁻¹)	Final O₂ Production Rate (mg O₂ L⁻¹)	Final Normalized O₂ Rate (per biomass)	Photosynthetic Health (Fv/Fm)
Antarctic Chlorophyta (Cycled 4-14°C)	0.653 [72]	1.03 [72]	Increased or Sustained [72]	0.6 - 0.75 (Significantly higher than C. vulgaris) [72]
Chlorella vulgaris (Cycled 9-27°C)	0.013 [72]	3.15 [72]	Decreased, but higher absolute than Antarctic species [72]	0.6 - 0.75 [72]
Chlorella vulgaris (Steady 10°C)	Not Reported	Not Reported	Decreased [72]	0.34 (Stressed culture) [72]

The data reveals that both Antarctic Chlorophyta and temperate C. vulgaris can acclimate to dynamic temperature regimes, as evidenced by increased oxygen production and healthy Fv/Fm values. While the cycled C. vulgaris culture achieved a higher final volumetric oxygen production rate, the Antarctic species demonstrated superior efficiency per unit of biomass and better photosynthetic health under its designated temperature cycle [72]. The poor performance of the steady-state C. vulgaris control highlights the importance of environmental acclimation, as a constant, sub-optimal temperature can be more detrimental than a dynamic one [72].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The following table details key reagents, strains, and equipment essential for research in this field.

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for Psychrotolerant Microbe Research

Item Name / Category	Function / Application	Specific Examples / Notes
Oleaginous Psychrotolerant Fungi	Lipid production for biofuels and nutraceuticals; thrives at low temperatures.	Mucor racemosus AH1: Optimal for unsaturated fatty acid (e.g., oleic, linoleic acid) production at 10-20°C [73].
Extremotolerant Bacterial Strains	Studying resistance mechanisms; potential for in-situ resource utilization (ISRU).	Novel Actinomycetota and Bacillota from NASA cleanrooms (e.g., Agrococcus phoenicis, Microbacterium spp.) [74].
Nile Red Dye	Fluorescent staining and quantification of intracellular lipid bodies in microorganisms.	Working concentration: 2 µg/mL; used for screening high-lipid producing isolates [73].
Sulfo-Phospho-Vanillin (SPV) Reagent	Colorimetric quantification of total lipid content in microbial biomass.	Reagent is mixed with sulfuric acid-treated samples; absorbance read at 530 nm [73].
Taguchi Statistical Design	Efficient optimization of multiple culture parameters (e.g., temp, pH, nutrients) with minimal experimental runs.	Used to optimize factors like temperature, carbon source (soluble starch), and nitrogen source (yeast extract) for lipid production [73].
Random Positioning Machine (RPM)	Ground-based simulator for approximating microgravity conditions for microbial cultures.	Used for pre-flight experiments to study microbial behavior in simulated spaceflight environments [75].

Integration into Space Exploration and Future Directions

The integration of psychrotolerant microorganisms extends beyond air revitalization, playing a central role in the sustainable exploration of space. Bio-ISRU aims to use biological systems to utilize local resources, such as Martian atmospheric CO₂ and nitrogen, or water ice, to produce oxygen, food, fuels, and pharmaceuticals on-demand [3] [55]. For instance, the cyanobacterium Anabaena has been grown on a 96% N₂, 4% CO₂ gas mixture at low pressure, simulating the Martian atmosphere [55]. Furthermore, extremotolerant organisms like desert Chroococcidiopsis are proposed as robust chassis for off-planet biomanufacturing [55].

Synthetic biology is poised to revolutionize this field by engineering microbes to enhance their capabilities, such as improving stress resistance, photosynthetic yield, or enabling the production of high-value pharmaceuticals [55]. The conceptual diagram below illustrates the multi-faceted role of engineered biology in a future space habitat.

Psychrotolerant microorganisms represent a critical biological resource for advancing the sustainability of long-duration space missions. The experimental data and protocols presented in this guide provide a foundation for selecting and evaluating species capable of reliable air revitalization and thermal regulation within the dynamic and challenging environments of spacecraft. Future research, particularly through the lens of synthetic biology and Bio-ISRU, will further unlock the potential of these extremophiles, enabling humanity to become a truly spacefaring civilization.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are fundamental for long-duration human space exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO), such as missions to the Moon and Mars. These systems aim to create a sustainable, Earth-independent environment by using biological processes to regenerate air, purify water, and produce food [3]. Within this framework, sequential cropping—the practice of cultivating multiple, consecutive crop cycles in the same hardware—is a critical capability for enhancing system sustainability and reducing resupply mass from Earth [76].

A significant paradigm shift is required to transition space crop production from single-use biological experiments to sustainable, multi-cycle agricultural systems [76]. Current systems, like the Veggie and Advanced Plant Habitat (APH) on the International Space Station (ISS), primarily utilize single-use root modules filled with consumable granular media, which are discarded after each harvest. This approach results in considerable mass allocation for resupply; for example, a single new crop cycle in the APH requires 4 kg of new porous arcillite substrate [76]. Sequential cropping in reusable systems presents specific challenges, primarily concerning system hygiene and microbial management. Post-harvest cleaning and sanitization are essential to prevent the buildup of biofilms from decaying root matter, which can compete with germinating seedlings for oxygen and potentially harbor pathogens [76]. Furthermore, real-time microbial monitoring is indispensable for verifying food safety, as the effects of foodborne illness could be more severe in spaceflight due to limited medical capabilities [76] [3]. Therefore, robust protocols for sanitization and microbial monitoring are the cornerstones of enabling reliable sequential cropping for air revitalization and food production in BLSS.

Sanitization Protocols for Soilless Nutrient Delivery Systems

Effective sanitization following each harvest is imperative to ensure successful seed germination and seedling establishment in subsequent crops. The primary goal is to remove organic debris and eliminate microbial populations without leaving toxic residues that could harm plants or crew members [76].

Key Considerations for Sanitization Agent Selection

Choosing an appropriate sanitization agent for spacecraft environments involves unique constraints not always present in terrestrial agriculture:

• Human Toxicity and Compatibility: All chemicals must be compatible with life support equipment and pose minimal toxicological risks to crew health. Agents that accumulate within watering systems or off-gas harmful volatiles are unsuitable [76].
• Efficacy and Storage: Sanitizers must be effective against common bacterial and fungal contaminants while having reasonable storage mass, volume, and shelf-life constraints [76].
• Plant Health: The chosen protocol must not leave phytotoxic residues that could impair the growth of subsequent crops.

While commercial terrestrial systems may use quaternary ammonium compounds or sodium hypochlorite (bleach), their use in space is problematic. Quaternary ammonium compounds, such as benzalkonium chloride, can have detrimental ototoxic effects and are difficult to flush completely from systems, posing a accumulation risk [76].

A Validated Sanitization Protocol for Sequential Cropping

A study investigating sustainable space crop production developed and tested a specific sanitization protocol over five consecutive crop cycles [76] [77] [78]. The protocol was designed for soilless nutrient delivery systems and compared against a standard hydroponic sanitization method.

The table below outlines the core steps of this validated protocol:

Table 1: Post-Harvest Sanitization Protocol for Sequential Cropping

Step	Procedure	Parameters	Primary Function
1. Post-Harvest Cleaning	Removal of plant biomass and root debris from the root module and nutrient delivery system.	N/A	Physical removal of organic matter that supports microbial growth.
2. Heat Sterilization	Exposure of the cleaned root module and system surfaces to elevated temperature.	60°C for 1 hour [76] [77] [78]	Reduction of viable microbial populations through thermal inactivation.
3. Chemical Sanitization	Soaking the root module and system components in a liquid sanitizing agent.	1% Hydrogen Peroxide for 12 hours [76] [77] [78]	Chemical oxidation and destruction of remaining microorganisms and biofilms.

This combined thermal-chemical protocol demonstrated efficacy in controlling microbial loads and enabled the production of safe-to-eat produce across multiple crop cycles. Hydrogen peroxide was selected as it decomposes into water and oxygen, minimizing the risk of toxic residue accumulation compared to other chemical agents [76].

Microbial Monitoring for Food Safety and System Health

Verifying the effectiveness of sanitization and ensuring the ongoing safety of grown produce requires sensitive and reliable microbial monitoring. Traditional culture-dependent methods, used for analyzing samples from ISS-grown plants, require return to Earth, depriving crews of real-time food safety information [76].

Transition to Near Real-Time Molecular Monitoring

Future missions necessitate a shift to near real-time, culture-independent monitoring techniques that can be performed inflight [76] [3]. These methods progress beyond ground-based cultures toward "swab-to-sequencer" processes.

One promising approach validated in recent research uses qPCR (quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction). This method targets and amplifies specific microbial DNA markers, allowing for the quantification of total microbial load from swab samples of reservoir and root module surfaces [76] [77]. The cleanliness measured by traditional aerobic plate counts was successfully verified using this qPCR-based protocol, providing a faster alternative suitable for flight [76].

Advanced concepts even propose the use of miniaturized PCR and DNA sequencing technologies (e.g., miniPCR, MinION) onboard the spacecraft, which would allow crews to identify specific microorganisms without sample return [76] [3].

Sampling Strategy and Analysis

A comprehensive microbial monitoring program involves sampling multiple points within the crop production system:

• Nutrient Solution Reservoir: Monitoring for planktonic (free-floating) microorganisms in the liquid nutrient solution [76] [77].
• Root Module Surfaces: Swabbing surfaces in contact with the root zone, where biofilm formation is most likely [76] [77].
• Plant Edible Biomass: Directly testing the leaves or fruits of the crop to confirm safety for consumption [76].

The workflow for implementing this microbial monitoring is illustrated in the following diagram:

Integration with Air Revitalization Through Microbial Photosynthesis

The protocols for sequential cropping are intrinsically linked to the broader goal of air revitalization in BLSS. Higher plant cultivation modules do more than produce food; they recycle and revitalize air through photosynthesis and recycle water through transpiration [3].

Phototrophic microorganisms, such as specific cyanobacteria and microalgae, are also vital components of advanced BLSS concepts. They are highly efficient at photosynthetic carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and oxygen (O2) production [35] [79]. Some systems, like the European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative), are designed with multiple compartments where microorganisms play key roles in purifying air, recovering water, and recycling waste [3] [35].

In a fully integrated BLSS, the sequential cropping of higher plants works in concert with these phototrophic microorganisms. The plants contribute to air revitalization and water recycling, while the microorganisms can process waste streams from the plant and crew compartments, converting them back into usable nutrients and oxygen. This creates a more resilient and closed-loop system, reducing the reliance on external resupply for long-duration missions to the Moon or Mars [3] [79].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Implementing the described protocols requires a specific set of reagents and materials. The following table details key items essential for the sanitization and microbial monitoring processes.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Sanitization and Monitoring

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Technical Notes
Hydrogen Peroxide (1%)	Chemical sanitization agent for root modules and system surfaces.	Effective concentration for microbial control; breaks down into water and oxygen, minimizing toxic residue [76] [77].
qPCR Assay Kits	For the quantification of total microbial load from environmental swabs.	Must be designed for inflight use; targets conserved microbial DNA regions [76].
DNA Extraction Kits	Preparation of samples from swabs for subsequent qPCR analysis.	Reagents should be stable and protocols simple for crew operation in microgravity [76].
General Swabs	Collection of microbial samples from hardware surfaces (reservoirs, root modules).	Standardized, sterile swabs for environmental monitoring [76] [77].
Aerobic Plate Count (APC) Media	Culture-dependent verification of microbial cleanliness (ground-based or backup).	Used as a baseline to validate molecular methods like qPCR [76] [78].
Nutrient Solution	Provides essential minerals and elements for plant growth in soilless systems.	Formulation is crop-specific; must be compatible with system materials and sanitizers [76].

The establishment of sustainable bioregenerative life support systems is a critical enabler for the future of human space exploration. The development and implementation of robust protocols for sequential cropping, specifically targeting post-harvest sanitization and inflight microbial monitoring, represent a fundamental paradigm shift from single-cycle experiments to multi-cycle agriculture in space. The validated protocol of heat sterilization followed by hydrogen peroxide soak, coupled with qPCR-based monitoring, provides a concrete methodology to ensure system hygiene and food safety. As research continues, these protocols will be seamlessly integrated with microbial photosynthesis systems for air revitalization, ultimately forming the backbone of the self-sufficient, closed-loop life support systems required for humanity to thrive on long-duration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

From Ground Analogs to Spaceflight: Performance Metrics and System Validation

Ground-based microgravity simulation platforms, particularly Random Positioning Machines (RPMs), serve as indispensable tools for preparing and validating space experiments. These systems replicate space-like conditions on Earth, enabling researchers to study biological and physical processes without the prohibitive costs and logistical constraints of frequent spaceflight missions. In the specific context of air revitalization through microbial photosynthesis, these platforms allow for systematic investigation of how microgravity affects microbial growth, metabolic activity, and photosynthetic efficiency in controlled environment life support systems (CELSS).

The fundamental principle behind RPM technology involves continuous reorientation of biological samples through multiple axes, effectively averaging the gravity vector to near zero over time. This simulated microgravity environment induces physiological responses in microorganisms that closely mirror those observed in actual spaceflight, providing valuable preliminary data for space experiment design. For research focusing on microbial-based air revitalization, RPMs enable the study of photosynthetic carbon fixation, oxygen production rates, and microbial community dynamics under space-relevant conditions, forming the critical groundwork for developing sustainable long-duration space mission support systems.

Technical Specifications of Random Positioning Machines

Operational Principles and Design

Random Positioning Machines operate on the principle of gravity vector averaging through continuous, random rotation using two independent frames:

• Inner Frame: Typically supports the experimental sample and rotates at variable speeds.
• Outer Frame: Provides secondary axis rotation, combining with the inner frame to achieve complex orientation patterns.

The mathematical foundation relies on the fact that constantly changing orientation prevents biological systems from perceiving a consistent gravity direction. The machine's control system utilizes algorithmic randomness to ensure no single orientation predominates over time, creating a simulated microgravity environment with residual accelerations typically below 0.001g. Modern RPM systems incorporate real-time monitoring sensors to track residual gravity, temperature, humidity, and other critical parameters throughout experiments.

Key Performance Parameters

Table 1: Technical Specifications of Commercial and Custom RPM Systems

Parameter	Standard Range	Advanced Systems	Measurement Methods
Rotation Speed	0.1-60 rpm	Up to 100 rpm	Optical encoders
Residual Gravity	10⁻² - 10⁻³ g	<10⁻³ g	Integrated accelerometers
Sample Capacity	1-5 kg	Up to 10 kg	Load cells
Control Accuracy	±0.1°	±0.01°	Stepper motor feedback
Temperature Stability	±0.5°C	±0.1°C	PID-controlled heating/cooling
Continuous Operation	30 days	>1 year	Reliability engineering

Experimental Design for Microbial Photosynthesis Research

Microbial Strain Selection and Cultivation

Research on air revitalization has prioritized oxygen-producing microorganisms with robust environmental adaptability. Based on space experiment findings, several promising candidates have emerged:

• Cyanidioschyzon merolae: An extremophilic red algae exhibiting enhanced carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCM) under stress conditions, particularly valuable for its efficiency in low-pH and high-temperature environments [80].
• Engineered Cyanobacteria: Strains modified with synthetic carbon fixation pathways such as the McG cycle, demonstrating up to 50% improved carbon fixation efficiency in ground-based testing [81].
• Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic lines: Engineered with dual-cycle CO₂ fixation systems, showing 2-3 times increased growth and enhanced lipid synthesis for simultaneous air revitalization and bioproduct generation [81].

Pre-experiment cultivation follows standardized protocols to ensure consistency. For cyanobacteria and microalgae, BG-11 medium with continuous illumination (50-100 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) at 25-30°C with air bubbling is typically used. Axenic cultures are verified through regular microscopy and plating on selective media.

RPM Experimental Protocol for Microbial Photosynthesis

A comprehensive methodology for investigating microbial photosynthesis under simulated microgravity includes the following steps:

• Sample Preparation:

  • Inoculate 50-100 mL of culture in specially designed gas-permeable bioreactor bags compatible with RPM mounting.
  • Adjust initial cell density to OD₇₅₀ = 0.1-0.3 for consistent starting conditions.
  • Implement redundant sterile containment systems to prevent contamination during extended RPM operation.

• RPM Integration and Parameters:

  • Mount bioreactors securely on the RPM platform, ensuring balanced load distribution.
  • Program rotation with randomized speed and direction changes every 10-60 seconds.
  • Set maximum rotation speed based on fluid dynamics to minimize shear stress (typically 30-60 rpm).
  • Implement 1g stationary controls in identical equipment positioned adjacent to the RPM.

• Environmental Control:

  • Maintain temperature at 25±0.5°C using integrated cooling systems.
  • Provide continuous illumination via LED arrays (wavelengths optimized for photosynthetic efficiency: 440nm, 680nm).
  • Monitor and record CO₂ concentrations (typically 0.04-2%) using non-invasive sensors.

• Data Collection Schedule:

  • Daily: Optical density, pH, dissolved O₂ concentration.
  • Every 48-72 hours: Sampling for chlorophyll content, Rubisco activity, and metabolic profiling.
  • Endpoint analyses: Transcriptomics, proteomics, and carbon fixation efficiency measurements.

Table 2: Key Metabolic Parameters for Microbial Photosynthesis in RPM Experiments

Parameter	Measurement Method	Frequency	Expected Changes in SMG
Oxygen Production	Clark-type electrode/Optical sensors	4-8 hour intervals	Variable (strain-dependent)
Carbon Fixation Rate	¹⁴C incorporation/HPLC	24-48 hours	10-50% increase in efficient strains
Chlorophyll Content	Acetone extraction/spectrophotometry	48 hours	Often decreased
RuBisCO Activity	Radioactive enzyme assay	72 hours	Variable regulation
Gene Expression	RNA-seq/qPCR	Endpoint	Stress response pathways upregulated
Membrane Composition	Lipidomics/GC-MS	Endpoint	Often altered fluidity

The experimental workflow for microbial photosynthesis studies in simulated microgravity can be visualized as follows:

Microbial Photosynthesis RPM Experimental Workflow

Microbial Response Pathways to Simulated Microgravity

Molecular Adaptation Mechanisms

Microorganisms subjected to simulated microgravity via RPM exhibit distinct molecular responses that impact their photosynthetic efficiency and potential for air revitalization:

• Carbon Concentrating Mechanisms (CCM): Extremophilic microalgae like Cyanidioschyzon merolae demonstrate upregulated CCM components under simulated microgravity, enhancing their carbon fixation efficiency through specialized structures called pyrenoids that concentrate CO₂ around RuBisCO enzymes [80].

• Oxidative Stress Pathways: The altered fluid dynamics and physiological stress in RPM conditions induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, triggering antioxidant defense systems including superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activities.

• Cell Wall and Membrane Remodeling: Microbes often modify their membrane fluidity and cell wall composition under simulated microgravity, affecting nutrient uptake, gas exchange, and overall photosynthetic performance.

The complex interplay of these adaptation pathways can be visualized as follows:

Microbial Molecular Responses to Simulated Microgravity

Validation Through Spaceflight Experiments

Correlation Between RPM and Actual Microgravity

Ground-based RPM experiments must be validated through actual spaceflight experiments to confirm their predictive value. Recent research demonstrates strong correlation in several key areas:

Chinese space station experiments with zebrafish and algae micro-ecosystems revealed similar physiological responses to those observed in RPM studies, including behavioral changes and altered photosynthetic efficiency [82]. The 43-day experiment successfully maintained a balanced ecosystem where "goldfish algae photosynthesis produces oxygen for zebrafish respiration, while zebrafish metabolites provide carbon sources for algae," validating the fundamental principles of biological air revitalization systems [82].

Space-based studies on mouse skeletal muscle cells in the China Space Station's biotechnology experiment cabinet demonstrated conserved molecular responses between actual microgravity and RPM simulations, particularly in autophagy regulation and metabolic adaptation [82]. These findings support the use of RPMs for predicting microbial behavior in space.

Advanced Monitoring Technologies

Space stations have developed sophisticated microbial monitoring systems that provide models for ground-based RPM experiments:

• Microbial Online Monitoring Module (MOMM): Chinese space station technology that enables real-time observation of microbial activity in air, water, and surface samples [83].
• Cultivation-based detection systems: Including specialized culture plates with temperature control and automated imaging systems [83].
• Culture-independent molecular detection: Implementation of LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) technology for rapid microbial identification without cultivation [83].

These technologies can be adapted for RPM experiments to enhance data collection quality and enable direct comparison with spaceflight results.

Research Reagent Solutions for RPM Experiments

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Microbial Photosynthesis Studies in RPM

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Experimental Function	Application Notes
Culture Media	BG-11 for cyanobacteria, AF-6 for microalgae	Provides essential nutrients and minerals	Modify viscosity to simulate space bioreactor conditions
Metabolic Indicators	Resazurin (cell viability), pH indicators	Real-time monitoring of metabolic activity	Non-invasive measurement compatible with long-term RPM
Fixation/Preservation	RNAlater, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde	Preserve molecular and structural integrity	Critical for endpoint analyses post-RPM exposure
Molecular Analysis Kits	RNA extraction kits, cDNA synthesis kits	Gene expression analysis	Focus on carbon fixation and stress response genes
Enzyme Activity Assays	RuBisCO activity assays, carbonic anhydrase	Quantify key photosynthetic enzymes	Compare activity rates between RPM and control samples
Antibodies	Anti-RuBisCO, anti-carbon concentrating mechanism proteins	Protein localization and quantification	Validate carbon fixation pathway regulation

Application to Space Air Revitalization Systems

Translation to Functional Systems

The knowledge gained from RPM experiments directly informs the design of microbial-based air revitalization systems for space habitats. Key applications include:

• Strain Selection for Space Bioreactors: RPM testing identifies microbial strains with enhanced photosynthetic performance under microgravity, such as Cyanidioschyzon merolae with its efficient carbon concentrating mechanism [80] or engineered strains with synthetic carbon fixation pathways [81].

• Bioreactor Operation Parameters: RPM-derived data guides critical parameters including optimal mixing regimes, gas exchange rates, and light delivery systems to maximize photosynthetic efficiency in space.

• Microbial Community Stability: Long-term RPM experiments reveal how microgravity affects community dynamics and functional resilience in multi-species systems relevant to air revitalization.

Future Research Directions

Based on current RPM research and space station findings, several priority areas emerge for future investigation:

• Integration of Synthetic Biology Approaches: Implementation of engineered carbon fixation pathways like the McG cycle into oxygen-producing microorganisms [81].
• Multi-Species System Optimization: Development of balanced microbial communities for simultaneous carbon fixation, oxygen production, and secondary metabolite synthesis.
• Advanced Monitoring Integration: Incorporation of space station-derived sensor technologies into RPM platforms for enhanced data collection.

The combination of RPM ground-based research with periodic spaceflight validation creates a powerful framework for developing robust, efficient microbial photosynthesis systems for long-duration space missions, ultimately enabling sustainable human presence beyond Earth through biological air revitalization.

The pursuit of human space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit necessitates advanced life support systems that enable self-sufficiency and sustainability independent of Earth resupply. Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent a critical technological frontier for long-duration missions, utilizing biological processes to regenerate air, purify water, and produce food [3]. Within this framework, microbial photosynthesis and plant-based systems offer promising pathways for air revitalization—the process of continuously removing toxic carbon dioxide and producing breathable oxygen through biological processes [35].

The International Space Station (ISS) serves as an essential testbed for developing these technologies, hosting facilities including the Vegetable Production System (Veggie) and the Advanced Plant Habitat (APH). Concurrent research on the ISS microbiome provides crucial insights into managing microbial communities for both system functionality and crew health. This whitepaper synthesizes current research and development in these interconnected domains, providing technical guidance for researchers and scientists engaged in space biology and BLSS development.

Hardware Platforms for Plant Growth in Microgravity

Vegetable Production System (Veggie)

The Veggie facility is a simplified plant growth chamber designed for microgravity research and fresh food production. Its purpose is to help NASA study plant growth in microgravity, add fresh food to the astronauts' diet, and enhance psychological well-being [84].

Design Specifications: The system weighs less than 18 pounds and uses approximately 90 watts of power [85]. It comprises three primary components:

• Lighting System: Utilizes red (120-360 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), blue (30-90 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), and green (30 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) LEDs configurable at low, medium, and high intensities to support photosynthesis [85].
• Bellows Enclosure: A flexible, transparent fluorinated polymer structure that contains the plant growth environment and directs airflow [85].
• Reservoir and Plant Pillows: A root mat reservoir hydrates "plant pillows"—fabric containers holding a calcined clay growth substrate mixed with controlled-release fertilizer and surface-sanitized seeds [86] [87].

Veggie relies on the ISS cabin environment for temperature control and carbon dioxide, with fans circulating cabin air through the plant growth volume [87]. This design intentionally exposes plants to the station's microbial and chemical environment, providing valuable data on plant-microbe interactions in space.

Advanced Plant Habitat (APH)

The Advanced Plant Habitat is a more sophisticated plant growth facility delivered to the ISS in 2017 as a successor to Veggie [85]. APH provides a fully enclosed, environmentally controlled chamber with extensive monitoring and automation capabilities. It offers precise regulation of temperature, humidity, carbon dioxide levels, and light spectrum—factors that Veggie relies on the ambient cabin environment to provide [85].

Table 1: Comparison of Plant Growth Hardware on the International Space Station

Feature	Veggie	Advanced Plant Habitat (APH)
Development Date	Deployed 2014 [85]	Delivered 2017 [85]
Power Consumption	~90 watts [85]	Higher capacity (precise wattage not specified)
Environmental Control	Uses cabin environment for temperature & CO₂ [87]	Fully enclosed with precise environmental control [85]
Automation Level	Basic functionality, requires crew interaction	Highly automated with extensive monitoring [85]
Research Focus	Crop production, psychological benefits, basic plant growth [84]	Advanced plant growth studies, gene expression, metabolic analysis [85]
Current Status	Operational	No longer available for proposed ISS studies as of ROSES-2024 amendment [88]

Research Findings from Veggie Experiments

The Veggie system has successfully cultivated multiple crops aboard the ISS, including 'Outredgeous' red romaine lettuce, 'Profusion' zinnia flowers, Tokyo Bekana Chinese cabbage, Mizuna mustard, and Waldmann's green lettuce [85]. The VEG-01 and VEG-03 experiments focused on demonstrating the feasibility of growing safe, nutritious food in microgravity.

Microbiological Safety Analysis: Extensive food safety testing of red romaine lettuce grown in Veggie showed bacterial and fungal counts ranging from 2.14 to 4.86 log₁₀ CFU/g, which falls within acceptable safety parameters for fresh produce [87]. Screening for human pathogens yielded negative results, confirming the edibility of space-grown crops [87]. Cultural and molecular characterization revealed variation in microbial diversity between leaf and root tissues, with root tissues exhibiting greater diversity [87].

Nutritional Analysis: Comparative analysis of flight and ground control tissues showed statistically significant differences in mineral content, including iron, potassium, sodium, phosphorus, sulfur, and zinc [87]. Total phenolic content also differed between space and Earth-grown plants, while no significant variations were observed in anthocyanin levels or oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) [87]. These findings confirm that leafy vegetable crops can produce safe, edible, fresh food to supplement astronauts' diets while providing baseline data for system optimization.

Microbial Applications for Air Revitalization and Life Support

Microbial Photosynthesis in Bioregenerative Life Support

Photobioreactors utilizing microorganisms represent a complementary approach to plant-based systems for air revitalization. These systems employ photosynthetic microbes—particularly cyanobacteria and microalgae—to capture carbon dioxide and produce oxygen through photosynthesis while generating edible biomass [35].

Theoretical Foundation: The typical human respiratory quotient is approximately 0.92 moles CO₂ produced per mole O₂ consumed [35]. Each standard 82 kg crew member consumes approximately 0.82 kg O₂ and produces 1.04 kg CO₂ daily [35]. Current ISS systems rely on physicochemical methods including a Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) via water electrolysis, and a Carbon Dioxide Reduction Assembly (CRA) utilizing the Sabatier reaction [35]. These systems create a hydrogen imbalance, requiring resupply or resulting in carbon loss [35].

Biological Solution: Microbial photobioreactors offer a regenerative alternative by performing the reaction: CO₂ + H₂O → Biomass + O₂. Unlike physicochemical systems that vent methane overboard, biological systems can recycle carbon into edible biomass, creating a more closed-loop system [35].

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Biological Air Revitalization Systems

System Type	Organisms Utilized	Primary Functions	Ground-Based Precedents
Microbial Photobioreactors	Cyanobacteria, Microalgae (e.g., Chlorella)	CO₂ removal, O₂ production, edible biomass [35]	BIOS-I, BIOS-III (Russia) [35]
Higher Plant Cultivation	Lettuce, Cabbage, Mizuna Mustard	Food production, air revitalization, water recycling [3]	NASA Biomass Production Chamber [35]
Hybrid Systems	Plants & Microbes	Waste treatment, air revitalization, food production [3]	MELiSSA (ESA), Lunar Palace 1 [3] [35]

Microbial Dynamics in the Space Environment

Recent investigations have yielded unprecedented insights into the microbial landscape of the ISS. A comprehensive study analyzing 803 surfaces across nine modules created the first 3D microbial and chemical map of the ISS U.S. Orbital Segment [11] [89].

Key Findings: The ISS microbiome demonstrates striking loss of phylogenetic diversity compared to terrestrial environments, positioning it as an extreme, human-input-dominated built environment [89]. Microbial distribution follows predictable patterns based on module function, with eating, exercising, and personal hygiene areas leaving stronger microbial and chemical signatures than research-oriented modules [89]. The station's microbiota is overwhelmingly dominated by human-associated microbes, particularly from skin, with minimal contribution from free-living terrestrial sources [89].

Pathogen Concerns: Studies have identified several pathogens on the World Health Organization's ESKAPE list, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas species [11]. These isolates often carry unnerving numbers of antibiotic resistance genes, particularly against beta-lactam antibiotics [11]. Persistent strains like Pantoea pearsonii have demonstrated remarkable resilience to cleaning protocols [11].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Veggie Crop Production Protocol

Plant Pillow Preparation: Plant pillows are constructed with a calcined clay growth substrate mixed with controlled-release fertilizer [86] [87]. Surface-sanitized seeds are affixed to wicking material within the pillows using water-soluble glue [87]. Pillows are packaged under sterile air prior to launch to minimize microbial contamination [87].

In-Orbit Activation: Crew members install plant pillows on the Veggie root mat reservoir and initiate growth by injecting approximately 100 milliliters of water into each pillow [86]. The LED lighting system is activated with prescribed intensity settings, and the transparent bellows is expanded to enclose the growth area [86].

Growth Monitoring and Harvest: Plants grow for predetermined durations (typically 28 days for lettuce) with periodic photographic documentation and water addition [86]. Microbial sampling is performed on plant tissues to monitor microbial populations [87]. At harvest, plant tissues are either consumed immediately or preserved by freezing for subsequent analysis on Earth [86] [87].

Microbiological Sampling and Analysis Protocol

Surface Sampling: Astronauts use swabs to collect samples from 803 surfaces across nine ISS modules, focusing on high-touch areas and locations with varying functions [11] [89]. Sampling follows standardized procedures to ensure consistency and comparability.

Genetic and Metabolomic Analysis: Laboratory analysis employs untargeted mass spectrometry to detect chemical metabolites and next-generation sequencing (specifically 16S rRNA sequencing for bacteria) to characterize microbial communities [11] [89]. Data is compared against terrestrial built environments from the Earth Microbiome Project to contextualize findings [89].

Data Integration: Microbial and chemical data are integrated into 3D models of the ISS interior to visualize spatial distribution patterns and identify potential contamination hotspots [89]. Source tracking algorithms estimate contributions from specific human and environmental sources [89].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Materials for Space-Based Biological Studies

Reagent/Equipment	Function	Application Example
Plant Pillows	Contain growth substrate, fertilizer, and seeds; interface with root mat watering system [86] [87]	Veggie crop production experiments [86]
Calcined Clay Substrate	Provides soil-free growth medium with excellent aeration and water retention [86]	Rooting medium in plant pillows [86]
Surface Sanitized Seeds	Ensure clean planting material with reduced microbial load [87]	All Veggie planting experiments [87]
Controlled-Release Fertilizer	Provides essential nutrients throughout growth cycle [86] [87]	Plant pillows for long-duration growth [86]
Swab Sampling Kits	Collect microbial samples from ISS surfaces [11]	ISS 3D microbial mapping study [11] [89]
DNA Sequencing Reagents	Characterize unculturable microbial communities [87]	Microbiome analysis of ISS surfaces and Veggie plants [89] [87]
Metabolomics Standards	Enable identification of chemical signatures via mass spectrometry [11]	Chemical mapping of ISS surfaces [11]

Integration and Future Research Directions

The integration of plant growth systems and microbial studies presents a synergistic opportunity to advance bioregenerative life support. The demonstrated success of Veggie in producing safe, nutritious crops provides a foundation for expanding the range of space-grown vegetables [87]. Concurrently, microbial mapping studies inform strategies for managing spacecraft microbiomes to protect both crew health and system functionality [11] [89].

Future research should prioritize several key areas:

• System Integration: Combining plant growth systems with microbial photobioreactors to create more robust, redundant life support systems [3] [35].
• Microbial Management: Developing targeted approaches to foster beneficial microbial communities while suppressing potential pathogens, potentially through probiotic introduction or phage therapy [11].
• Technology Development: Creating miniaturized biosensors for real-time monitoring of microbial populations and chemical contaminants [11].
• Regolith Bioprocessing: Investigating microbial and plant systems for in situ resource utilization, particularly using nitrogen-fixing bacteria to enhance the fertility of lunar and Martian regolith [3].

The retirement of APH as an available research platform [88] underscores the importance of leveraging the operational Veggie facility and ground-based analogs to continue advancing biological life support technologies. As mission planners look toward sustained lunar operations and eventual Mars expeditions, the knowledge gained from ISS research in Veggie, microbial systems, and their integration will be fundamental to enabling long-duration human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit.

Bioregenerative System Integration Logic

Space Biology Experimental Workflow

The establishment of a sustainable human presence beyond low Earth orbit necessitates the development of closed-loop life support systems that minimize reliance on resupply missions from Earth [3]. A core challenge in long-duration space missions is air revitalization – the continuous provision of oxygen (O2) for crew respiration and the simultaneous removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) [54]. While the International Space Station relies on physico-chemical systems for this purpose, these technologies are not fully regenerative and require periodic maintenance and resupply [54]. Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) offer a promising alternative by using biological processes to create a self-sustaining ecosystem [3]. Within this context, microbial photosynthesis – utilizing photosynthetic microorganisms like cyanobacteria and microalgae – has emerged as a viable technology for simultaneous carbon dioxide fixation and oxygen production, effectively converting crew waste into vital resources [3] [90].

This whitepaper provides an in-depth technical analysis of the performance benchmarks for oxygen production rates and carbon dioxide fixation efficiency in microbial phototrophic systems. We synthesize current research data, detail standardized experimental protocols for benchmarking, and frame these findings within the specific constraints and requirements of space research and development, supporting the broader thesis that microbial photosynthesis is a critical enabling technology for sustainable space exploration.

Core Principles of Microbial Photosynthesis

Carbon Fixation Pathways in Microorganisms

Photosynthetic microorganisms utilize several autotrophic pathways to fix inorganic carbon into biomass. The Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle is the most common pathway, predominantly found in cyanobacteria and microalgae, and uses the enzyme RuBisCO to catalyze the primary CO2 fixation step [91] [92]. However, at least five other natural carbon-fixation pathways have been identified in various bacteria and archaea, including the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle, the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, and the 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle [91]. The discovery of these diverse pathways expands the potential for engineering more efficient carbon fixation systems. Synthetic biology is now being employed to design and implement artificial CO2 fixation pathways in suitable host organisms, offering the potential to overcome the limitations of natural pathways, such as the low catalytic efficiency of RuBisCO and its sensitivity to oxygen [91] [93]. These engineered pathways, such as the CETCH cycle and the reductive glycine pathway, are designed for higher energy and carbon efficiency, which is paramount for resource-limited environments like space habitats [91].

From Carbon Fixation to Oxygen Production

In oxygenic photosynthesis, the light-dependent reactions split water molecules (H2O), using light energy to generate chemical energy (ATP and NADPH) and release molecular oxygen (O2) as a byproduct. The fixed carbon dioxide is then reduced into organic compounds, such as sugars, using this chemical energy in the light-independent reactions (e.g., the CBB cycle) [92]. The overall reaction can be summarized as: CO2 + H2O + Light Energy → [CH2O] + O2 The stoichiometry of this reaction creates an intrinsic link between CO2 fixation and O2 production; for every mole of CO2 fixed, approximately one mole of O2 is evolved. Therefore, the carbon dioxide fixation rate is a direct proxy for the oxygen production rate in these systems. The efficiency of this coupled process is influenced by multiple factors, including the microbial strain, light intensity and quality, CO2 concentration, nutrient availability, and bioreactor design [94] [90]. Understanding and optimizing these parameters is the key to developing efficient BLSS for space applications.

Quantitative Performance Benchmarks

Carbon Dioxide Fixation Efficiency

Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Efficiency (CDSE) is a critical metric for evaluating the performance of photosynthetic microorganisms. It measures the percentage of inorganic carbon input that is successfully converted into organic carbon within the biomass.

Table 1: CO2 Fixation Efficiency of Select Microalgae Strains

Microalgae Strain	CO2 Condition	Maximum CDSE (%)	Average CDSE (%)	Reference
Tribonema minus ARC-10	High (1.5% CO2)	30.0 ± 1.52	19.1 ± 2.18	[94]
Desmodesmus armatus ARC-06	High (1.5% CO2)	16.5 ± 1.12	11.8 ± 1.45	[94]
Tribonema minus ARC-10	Low (0.04% CO2)	Data Not Provided	Data Not Provided	[94]
Desmodesmus armatus ARC-06	Low (0.04% CO2)	Data Not Provided	Data Not Provided	[94]

Data adapted from a 2025 study evaluating novel strains under periodic cultivation [94]. The results underscore significant strain-specific variations in CO2 fixation performance. Tribonema minus demonstrated superior tolerance and fixation efficiency under elevated CO2 conditions, making it a promising candidate for applications involving concentrated CO2 streams, such as cabin air revitalization where CO2 levels can be elevated [94]. The study also highlights that producing 1 kg of dry microalgae biomass requires an average of 1.83 kg of CO2, demonstrating the significant carbon sequestration potential of these organisms [94].

Oxygen Production Rates

Quantifying oxygen production is technically challenging, and it is often calculated indirectly from well-established carbon fixation rates. The theoretical oxygen production can be derived from the stoichiometry of photosynthesis and biomass composition.

Table 2: Theoretical Oxygen Production Based on Biomass Yield

Parameter	Value	Notes
CO2 required for 1 kg biomass	1.83 kg (average)	Range: 1.3 - 2.4 kg [94]
Molar ratio (O2 produced : CO2 fixed)	~1 : 1	Based on photosynthetic stoichiometry
Theoretical O2 yield per kg biomass	~1.33 kg	Calculated from average CO2 fixed

Direct measurement of oxygen production is a key activity in space-life support research. For instance, small Chlorella or Limnospira photobioreactors are being studied for their capacity to recycle waste streams and produce oxygen in life support systems [90]. The European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) project is a prominent example where compartments containing microorganisms and plants are designed to purify air, produce food, and recycle waste [3]. The performance, however, is highly dependent on the cultivation system's optimization. Factors such as light delivery, gas transfer rates, nutrient availability, and culture density directly impact the overall oxygen evolution rate, making system design as important as the biological agent itself [3] [90].

Experimental Protocols for Benchmarking

Standardized Cultivation and Analysis Workflow

To ensure reproducibility and accurate comparison of performance benchmarks across different studies, a standardized experimental protocol is essential. The following workflow, synthesized from current methodologies, outlines the key steps for assessing CO2 fixation and O2 production.

Diagram Title: Microbial Photosynthesis Benchmarking Workflow

Phase 1: Strain Selection and Inoculum Preparation Select and maintain pure cultures of the photosynthetic microorganisms (e.g., cyanobacteria or microalgae) on solid or liquid medium [94]. For the experiment, pre-culture the strain in sterile liquid medium (e.g., modified Bold's Basal Medium with triple nitrogen content) in Erlenmeyer flasks placed on an orbital shaker. Maintain conditions at a defined temperature (e.g., 22.5 ± 0.5 °C) and under continuous illumination (e.g., 150 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) until the culture reaches the mid-exponential growth phase, achieving a target dry biomass concentration (e.g., ~0.1 g L⁻¹) to be used as inoculum [94].

Phase 2: Main Cultivation System Setup Grow the microorganisms in a controlled Laboratory System for Intensive Cultivation (LSIC), such as a photobioreactor with the following standardized parameters [94]:

• Temperature: Maintain at a constant level (e.g., 27.0 ± 0.6 °C).
• Illumination: Provide continuous, uniform light (e.g., 300 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) using white LED modules.
• CO2 Supply: Continuously bubble the culture with a defined air mixture. Test both low (0.04%) and high (1.5%) CO2 levels as a variable, with a constant gas flow rate (e.g., ~0.2 L min⁻¹).
• Culture Volume & Agitation: Ensure constant mixing to maintain homogeneity and prevent sedimentation.

Phase 3: Continuous Monitoring and Sampling Monitor and record the following parameters at regular intervals (e.g., daily) throughout the cultivation period [94]:

• Optical Density (OD750): Measured with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer to track growth.
• pH of the Medium: Changes indicate CO2 dissolution and consumption.
• Inlet and Outlet CO2 Concentration: Use a gas analyzer (e.g., PKU-4 NMT) to measure the CO2 content in the gas stream before and after it passes through the culture. This is crucial for calculating CDSE.

Phase 4: Biomass Harvesting and Analytical Processing At the end of the experiment or at designated time points, harvest the biomass for analysis [94]:

• Dry Weight Measurement: Filter a known culture volume, dry the biomass to a constant weight, and measure.
• Organic Carbon Concentration: Use elemental analysis or chemical oxidation methods to determine the organic carbon content within the biomass.
• Product Analysis: Analyze the biomass for valuable compounds (e.g., lipids, pigments, carbohydrates).

Phase 5: Data Calculation and Performance Benchmarking

• Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Efficiency (CDSE): Calculate using the formula: CDSE (%) = [(Cin - Cout) / Cin] * 100, where Cin and Cout are the concentrations of CO2 in the inlet and outlet gas streams, respectively [94].
• Specific Growth Rate (μ): Determine from the OD750 or dry weight data over time.
• Oxygen Production Rate: Estimate theoretically from the amount of CO2 fixed, assuming a 1:1 molar ratio, or measure directly using an dissolved oxygen probe in a closed system.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Reagents and Equipment for Microbial Photosynthesis Research

Item	Function / Application	Example / Specification
Microalgae/Cyanobacteria Strains	Core photosynthetic agents for CO2 fixation and O2 production.	Tribonema minus, Desmodesmus armatus, Chlorella spp., Limnospira (Spirulina), engineered cyanobacteria [94] [90] [93].
Cultivation Medium	Provides essential macro and micronutrients for growth.	Bold's Basal Medium (BBM), BBM 3N (3x Nitrogen), supplemented with Vitamin B12 [94].
Photobioreactor (PBR)	Controlled environment for cultivating phototrophic microbes.	Laboratory System for Intensive Cultivation (LSIC); must provide control over temperature, light, gas mixing, and pH [94].
Light Source	Energy source for photosynthesis.	White LED modules (2700-3000 K), capable of delivering precise photon flux (e.g., 300 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) [94].
Gas Mixing & Supply System	Delivers defined CO2/air mixtures to the culture.	Mass flow controllers to mix CO2 with air, maintaining precise concentrations (e.g., 0.04% to 1.5%) and flow rates [94].
Gas Analyzer	Measures CO2 concentration in inlet and outlet gas streams.	PKU-4 NMT gas analyzer or equivalent, with high accuracy for CDSE calculation [94].
Spectrophotometer	Measures optical density (OD) to monitor microbial growth.	UV-Vis spectrophotometer for reading OD750 [94].

Advanced Concepts and Future Directions

Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Pathways

The field is moving beyond natural pathways through metabolic engineering and synthetic biology to enhance the performance of microbial photosynthesis. Research is focused on overcoming the inherent inefficiencies of natural systems, such as the poor kinetics of RuBisCO and photorespiration [95] [93]. Advanced strategies include:

• Enzyme Engineering: Using computational protein design and directed evolution to develop artificial photoenzymes that simplify and boost the efficiency of photosynthesis beyond natural limits [93].
• Pathway Implementation: Introducing synthetic carbon fixation pathways, such as the CETCH cycle, which is more energy-efficient than the Calvin cycle, into suitable hosts [91].
• Cyanobacteria Engineering: Modifying cyanobacteria, which are genetically tractable and fast-growing, to concentrate more CO2 within their cellular "reactors," thereby increasing the substrate available for fixation and improving overall efficiency [93].

These approaches aim to create microbial cell factories that are tailor-made for the specific task of air revitalization in space, with enhanced rates of CO2 fixation and O2 production.

Integration with Bioregenerative Life Support Systems

The ultimate application of this technology is its integration into a larger Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS). In this context, microbial photosynthesis serves multiple functions [3]:

• Atmosphere Revitalization: The primary function of converting CO2 to O2.
• Water Treatment: Microalgae can utilize nutrients from processed liquid waste, contributing to water purification.
• Biomass Production: The generated microbial biomass can be a source of nutrients for astronauts, used as a food supplement, or processed into other valuable materials [90].
• Waste Recycling: The system can integrate with other biological components, such as higher plant cultivation, where microbial processes help recycle solid and liquid wastes [3].

Projects like NASA's legacy "BioHome," the Soviet BIOS-3, and the ongoing ESA MELiSSA project illustrate the viability of integrating microbial-based air revitalization into a closed-loop habitat [3]. Future research will focus on optimizing the integration of these biological components, ensuring system stability, and scaling the technologies for missions to the Moon and Mars.

Microbial photosynthesis presents a viable and multifunctional technology for air revitalization in long-duration space missions. Performance benchmarks, as detailed in this paper, show that selected microbial strains like Tribonema minus can achieve a Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Efficiency of up to 30% under optimized, high-CO2 conditions, directly enabling significant oxygen production [94]. The standardized experimental protocols and toolkit provided here offer a foundation for researchers to consistently evaluate and compare future strains and system configurations.

The path forward involves a concerted effort in strain bioprospecting, advanced metabolic engineering, and intelligent system design to overcome current limitations in efficiency and scalability. By uniting advances across biology, chemistry, and engineering, microbial-based air revitalization will be a cornerstone of sustainable human exploration beyond Earth, closing the life support loop and enabling humanity to become an interplanetary species.

Air revitalization is a critical challenge for long-duration human space missions, requiring sustainable technologies to regenerate oxygen from astronaut-respired carbon dioxide. Within this context, two primary biological approaches have emerged: microbial systems utilizing cyanobacteria and microalgae, and higher plant cultivation in controlled environments [3]. A third, non-biological approach relies on physicochemical (PC) methods to manage atmospheric composition. Each paradigm offers distinct advantages and limitations in mass, volume, operational complexity, and system resilience. This technical analysis provides a comparative evaluation of these systems, focusing on their application for photosynthetic air revitalization in space exploration contexts, with specific experimental data and protocols to guide research and development decisions.

Technical Comparison of Air Revitalization Systems

Table 1: Comparative Technical Parameters of Air Revitalivation Systems

Parameter	Microbial Systems (Cyanobacteria/Microalgae)	Higher Plant Systems	Physicochemical Systems
Primary Oxygen Production Mechanism	Oxygenic photosynthesis [58]	Oxygenic photosynthesis [3]	Electrolysis of water or CO₂ reduction (Sabatier)
Mass Efficiency	High (26-85% mass savings over abiotic means reported) [55]	Lower (requires significant biomass and growth infrastructure) [3]	Low (requires consumables or resupply from Earth)
Volume/Footprint	Compact; suitable for microfluidic systems (e.g., 120 μL wells) [58]	Large; requires extensive cultivation space [3]	Moderate to large
Integration with Waste Streams	High; can utilize CO₂, recycled nutrients, and in-situ resources [55] [3]	High; can integrate with water recycling and organic waste [3]	Limited; typically single-purpose
Secondary Benefits	Potential for biofuel, nutrient, and radiation shield production [3]	Direct food production, psychological benefits [3]	High reliability, predictable output
Key Challenges	Long-term stability in closed systems, gas bubble management [58]	Susceptibility to microbial contamination (e.g., Fusarium) [3]	Limited self-sustainability, dependent on Earth resupply

Table 2: Experimental Performance Data from Flight and Ground Studies

System / Experiment	Organism / Technology	Key Performance Metric	Result	Citation
GraviSat Platform (Ground Simulation)	Chlorella vulgaris, Dunaliella bardawil	Long-term growth stability in microfluidic well	>10 months without excess O₂ production	[58]
Veggie System (ISS)	Red romaine lettuce, Mizuna mustard	Pathogen-free food production & microbial safety	Successfully grown and consumed; pathogen-free	[3]
BLSS (Theoretical Model)	Microbial Consortia	Self-sufficiency in life support	Provides O₂ production, water treatment, waste recycling	[3]
Bio-ISRU (Theoretical Model)	Cyanobacteria (e.g., Anabaena sp.)	Growth under simulated Martian atmosphere (96% N₂, 4% CO₂)	Demonstrated feasibility	[55]

Experimental Protocols for System Validation

Protocol: Assessing Microbial Photosynthesis in a Simulated Space Microgravity Platform

This protocol is adapted from the development of the GraviSat nanosatellite platform, designed to evaluate microalgal photosynthesis under variable gravity conditions [58].

1. Objective: To quantitatively measure the impact of microgravity and space radiation on the photosynthetic efficiency and growth dynamics of candidate microalgae.

2. Research Reagent Solutions & Materials: Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials

Item	Function / Specification
Microalgal Strains	Chlorella vulgaris UTEX 29, Dunaliella bardawil 30 861 (selected for prolonged growth and low O₂ production) [58]
Growth Medium	Modified DSMZ 63 medium (for cyanobacteria); deaerated phosphate buffer with sodium lactate [55]
Microfluidic Polymer Disc	Contains 120 μL wells for culture growth and analysis [58]
Optical Sensors	Pulse Amplitude Modulated (PAM) fluorometry for measuring photosynthetic efficiency [58]
Electrochemical Sensors	Ion-sensitive microelectrodes for dissolved O₂, pH, and dissolved inorganic CO₂ [58]

3. Methodology:

• Culture Preparation and Stasis: Select and pre-condition microalgal strains for compatibility with polymer disc materials and prolonged growth. Induce reversible metabolic stasis for pre-launch storage [58].
• Platform Operation: Launch cultures in stasis. Initiate growth in orbit by hydrating wells. The platform comprises a rotating disc to generate artificial gravity (from microgravity to multiples of Earth gravity) and a stationary disc for microgravity control [58].
• Data Collection: Automatically monitor cultures in orbit.
  • Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: Use PAM fluorometry to measure photosynthetic efficiency (e.g., every few seconds) [58].
  • Physicochemical Parameters: Use integrated microelectrodes to track dissolved O₂, CO₂, and pH in real-time [58].
• Data Analysis: Compare physiological data from spinning (artificial gravity) and stationary (microgravity) discs. Statistically evaluate the isolated effect of gravity by controlling for launch conditions and radiation exposure [58].

Protocol: Evaluating Plant-Microbe Interactions for Regolith-Based Cultivation

This protocol assesses a Bio-ISRU approach to enhance plant growth for life support by fertilizing in-situ resources (regolith) with nitrogen-fixing bacteria [3].

1. Objective: To determine the efficacy of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in improving the fertility of Martian regolith simulant for sustainable plant cultivation.

2. Methodology:

• Experimental Setup: Prepare growth containers with Martian regolith simulant. Establish two treatment groups: 1) Simulant inoculated with the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti; 2) Uninoculated control simulant [3].
• Plant Cultivation: Sow clover (Melilotus officinalis) seeds in both treatments. Grow for three months under controlled environmental conditions (light, temperature, humidity) relevant to a space habitat [3].
• Data Collection and Analysis:
  • Plant Biomass: Measure and compare the dry shoot and root biomass of clover plants between treatments [3].
  • Soil Nitrogen Analysis: Quantify the concentration of reactive nitrogen (NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺) in the regolith simulant at the end of the growth period [3].
  • Statistical Analysis: Use analysis of variance (ANOVA) to confirm significant differences in plant growth and soil nitrogen between inoculated and control groups [3].

System Workflows and Metabolic Pathways

Integrated Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS) Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the interconnected roles of microbial and higher plant systems within a conceptual BLSS, showcasing the multi-step bioregenerative process.

Microbial Photosynthesis and Bio-ISRU Pathway

This diagram details the core metabolic pathway of cyanobacteria in a Bio-ISRU context, converting in-situ resources into vital products for air revitalization and other applications.

The choice between microbial systems, higher plants, and physicochemical methods for air revitalization in space is not a matter of selecting a single superior technology. Instead, mission-specific parameters—particularly duration and distance from Earth—will dictate the optimal strategy. Near-Earth missions may continue to rely on robust physicochemical systems, while long-duration lunar or Martian missions will necessitate the sustainability of bioregenerative approaches. The most promising path forward lies in the development of hybrid systems that leverage the compact efficiency of microbes for primary air revitalization and the multifaceted benefits of higher plants for food production and psychological support, all while using physicochemical systems as reliable backups. The experimental frameworks and comparative data provided herein offer a foundation for the targeted research and development required to make these integrated life-support ecosystems a reality for the future of human space exploration.

Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) are a systematic metric used to assess the maturity level of a particular technology. The scale consists of nine levels, with TRL 1 being the lowest (basic principles observed) and TRL 9 being the highest (actual system proven in successful mission operations). Originally developed by NASA during the 1970s, the TRL framework has since been adopted by the European Space Agency (ESA), the U.S. Department of Defense, and the European Union Horizon 2020 program, providing a consistent methodology for discussing technical maturity across different types of technology [96] [97]. This whitepaper examines the current state and development gaps of technologies for air revitalization through microbial photosynthesis within this established TRL framework, providing researchers with a comprehensive assessment of capabilities and experimental approaches.

Table: Traditional NASA Technology Readiness Levels

TRL	Description	Technology Maturity Phase
1	Basic principles observed and reported	Basic research
2	Technology concept and/or application formulated	Invention
3	Analytical and experimental critical function proof-of-concept	Proof of concept
4	Component validation in laboratory environment	Lab validation
5	Component validation in relevant environment	Environment validation
6	System demonstration in relevant environment	Prototype demonstration
7	System prototype demonstration in operational environment	Operational environment testing
8	Actual system completed and qualified	System qualified
9	Actual system proven through successful missions	Mission proven

TRLs in the Context of Microbial Photosynthesis for Air Revitalization

For air revitalization technologies utilizing microbial photosynthesis, the TRL scale provides a crucial framework for evaluating progress toward flight readiness. These systems aim to create closed-loop life support where microorganisms like cyanobacteria consume carbon dioxide and produce oxygen through photosynthesis, while also potentially providing other benefits such as food production and waste recycling [6] [98]. The core advantage of biological systems over purely physicochemical approaches lies in their potential for self-sustaining operation with occasional monitoring, their resilience, and their overall lower energy requirements [98]. Current research focuses on adapting terrestrial microbial technologies to meet the specific challenges of the space environment, including microgravity, increased radiation, and resource constraints.

Diagram: TRL Progression and Key Development Gaps in Microbial Air Revitalization. The diagram illustrates the sequential nature of technology development and critical gaps that emerge at different maturity stages.

Current Capabilities and Technology Status

The current state of microbial photosynthesis for air revitalization spans multiple TRLs depending on the specific technology component, with most systems residing at the lower to middle maturity levels (TRL 3-6). Ground-based demonstrators have tested controlled cultivation chambers and biological waste management, with some bioreactor and plant cultivation components tested in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) onboard FOTON and the International Space Station (ISS) [6]. These tests, however, have typically been conducted on single biological systems at small scales (less than 100 mL or 0.2 m²), with low overall yield, over short durations, and with significant crew involvement [6]. The European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) program has led to the construction of a pilot plant in Spain and a plant characterization unit in Italy, aimed at designing and testing closed-loop systems providing oxygen, potable water, and fresh food by recycling organic and inorganic wastes [6].

Internationally, significant disparities exist in BLSS development. While NASA discontinued its Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) habitat demonstration program in 2004, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) has advanced these technologies, successfully demonstrating closed-system operations for atmosphere, water, and nutrition that sustained a crew of four analog taikonauts for a full year [1]. This demonstrates that while foundational research exists at mid-TRL levels, fully integrated systems remain at development stages.

Table: Current TRL Assessment for Microbial Photosynthesis Technologies

Technology Component	Current TRL	Key Capabilities	Limitations
Cyanobacteria-based CO₂ capture (Anabaena sp.)	4-5	Carbon & nitrogen fixation at Martian atmospheric mix (96% N₂, 4% CO₂) [55]	Limited testing in space-relevant gravity & radiation conditions
Photobioreactor systems	5-6	Small-scale (≤100 mL) operation in LEO demonstrated [6]	Small scale, high crew time requirements
Waste processing & recycling	4	MELiSSA interconnected bioreactors demonstrate waste upcycling [98]	Not fully integrated with air revitalization systems
Hybrid systems (plants & microbes)	3-4	Ground demonstrations of multiple component interactions [6]	Limited data on long-term stability

Identification of Critical Development Gaps

Several critical gaps impede the advancement of microbial photosynthesis systems to higher TRLs. A primary challenge is the integration of all compartments on Earth before addressing the additional complications of space environmental conditions, which include reduced gravity, increased ionizing radiation, lower atmospheric pressure, regolith dust, different atmospheric composition, and magnetic fields [6]. These factors could significantly impact the efficiency of biological components and the input/output balance among interconnected compartments. The scaling challenge is particularly acute, as future BLSS compartments supporting astronauts will need significant optimization for efficiency, robustness, autonomy, remote control, and integration into complex habitats [6].

From a geopolitical and programmatic perspective, the discontinuation of NASA's bioregenerative life support programs has created strategic capability gaps in current NASA capabilities, posing a risk to US leadership in human space exploration [1]. Additionally, fundamental knowledge gaps exist regarding how space conditions, particularly deep space radiation, affect biological systems over extended periods. The lack of specialized test facilities capable of fully integrated, closed-loop testing with human crews represents another significant gap, with Europe still relying on international partners for such capabilities [6].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Cyanobacterial Cultivation Under Simulated Space Conditions

A representative experimental protocol for evaluating cyanobacterial air revitalization at TRL 4 involves cultivating strains such as Anabaena sp. PCC 7938 under simulated Martian atmospheric conditions [55]. The methodology requires a precisely controlled environment with specific gas composition (96% N₂, 4% CO₂ at 100 hPa total pressure), temperature (25-30°C), and illumination (50-100 μmol photons/m²/s). Researchers monitor growth kinetics through daily optical density measurements at 730 nm and chlorophyll-a quantification via methanol extraction and spectrophotometry. Gas exchange parameters are critically analyzed using mass spectrometry to quantify O₂ production and CO₂ consumption rates, with metabolic activity further assessed through glycogen and protein content analyses. Culture viability is maintained through periodic subculturing in fresh medium, typically BG-11, with experiments running for minimum of 30 days to evaluate system stability.

Photobioreactor System Integration Testing

For systems approaching TRL 5-6, testing progresses to integrated photobioreactor systems in relevant environments. The experimental setup involves connecting cyanobacterial cultivation units with analogous human habitat atmospheric systems. The protocol specifies continuous monitoring of atmospheric O₂ and CO₂ levels using infrared gas analyzers and zirconia-based O₂ sensors, with automated control systems maintaining predetermined gas concentrations. Researchers introduce variable metabolic loads, typically 0.5-1.0 kg CO₂/day per crew member equivalent, to simulate human presence. Water recycling is integrated by using cyanobacterial filtrate to replenish cultivation media, thereby testing closed-loop functionality. System resilience is evaluated through stress tests, including 24-hour dark cycles simulating emergency scenarios, temperature fluctuations, and introduction of potential contaminant organisms. Performance metrics focus on closure percentage for carbon and oxygen loops, system stability duration, and biomass productivity.

Diagram: Experimental Workflow for Microbial Air Revitalization R&D. The sequential process from initial strain selection through final performance analysis guides technology maturation.

Research Reagent Solutions and Essential Materials

Table: Key Research Reagents for Microbial Air Revitalization Experiments

Reagent/Material	Function	Example Specifications
BG-11 Medium	Cyanobacterial growth medium	Contains nitrate, phosphate, micronutrients; pH 7.1-7.4 [55]
Anabaena sp. PCC 7938	Model cyanobacterium for C & N fixation	Capable of growth at 96% N₂, 4% CO₂ [55]
Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002	Model cyanobacterium for oxygenation studies	Used in trace compound impact studies [99]
CO₂ Infrared Gas Analyzer	Quantify carbon dioxide consumption	0-5% range, ±0.1% accuracy
Zirconia O₂ Sensor	Measure oxygen production	0-25% range, ±0.01% accuracy
Simulated Martian Regolith	Solid substrate for bio-ISRU studies	Chemically equivalent to Martian surface composition
LED Photobioreactor Illumination	Provide photosynthetically active radiation	400-700 nm spectrum, adjustable 0-500 μmol/m²/s

The development of microbial photosynthesis technologies for air revitalization in space applications currently spans TRL 3-6, with significant advancements needed to reach flight-ready status (TRL 9). Critical gaps persist in system integration, testing under space-relevant environmental conditions, and long-term reliability validation. The experimental protocols and reagent solutions outlined provide a roadmap for researchers to systematically address these challenges and advance the technology maturity. As mission scenarios evolve toward longer duration and greater distance from Earth, the imperative for closed-loop, bioregenerative life support systems will only intensify, necessitating continued investment in the fundamental and applied research that will elevate these promising technologies to operational status.

Conclusion

Microbial photosynthesis represents a paradigm shift in life support system design, offering sustainable air revitalization through biologically-driven carbon recycling. The integration of cyanobacteria and microalgae into multifunctional photobioreactors demonstrates significant potential for reducing Earth-dependency in long-duration missions, though challenges in microgravity adaptation and system reliability require further investigation. Future research directions should prioritize genetic engineering of specialized microbial chassis, development of automated monitoring systems, and long-duration validation in space environments. The technological advancements in space-based microbial systems present compelling translational opportunities for terrestrial biomedical applications, including novel oxygen production systems, bioactive compound development, and closed-loop medical life support technologies. As humanity prepares for extended presence beyond low Earth orbit, microbial photosynthesis stands as a critical enabling technology for sustainable space exploration and a source of innovation for clinical research.

References

• 1. Critical investments in bioregenerative life support systems for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12357894/]
• 2. Life Support Subsystems [https://www.nasa.gov/reference/jsc-life-support-subsystems/]
• 3. Microbial applications for sustainable space exploration ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-023-00285-0]
• 4. The influence of different storage conditions on Limnospira ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41111911/]
• 5. Microalgae in bioregenerative life support systems for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221192642300365X]
• 6. Plant and microbial science and technology as ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-023-00317-9]
• 7. Use of Photobioreactors in Regenerative Life Support ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699525/full]
• 8. Photoacclimation strategies in cyanobacterial photosynthesis ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12581863/]
• 9. Microalgae enhanced plant growth and yield ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-24004-9]
• 10. Review of Microgravity Biotechnology for Space Applications ... [https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2025/RA-S3-2025/4/]
• 11. Charting the Microbial Map: What Astronauts Leave Behind [https://issnationallab.org/upward/charting-the-microbial-map-what-astronauts-leave-behind/]
• 12. Monitoring Microorganisms [https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/iss-research/monitoring-microorganisms/]
• 13. Plants in Microgravity: Molecular and Technological ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9505700/]
• 14. Exploring plant responses to altered gravity for advancing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590346225001324]
• 15. Understanding photosynthetic biofilm productivity and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9037940/]
• 16. Energy Conversion in Natural and Artificial Photosynthesis [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2891097/]
• 17. New Insights Into Nature's Oxygen-Making Machinery [https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2025/07/08/how-plants-manage-light-new-insights-into-natures-oxygen-making-machinery/]
• 18. MIT chemists boost the efficiency of a key enzyme in ... [https://news.mit.edu/2025/mit-chemists-boost-efficiency-key-enzyme-photosynthesis-0707]
• 19. Review Enhancing crop yields to ensure food security ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1673852725000177]
• 20. Can Boosting Photosynthesis Efficiency Improve Crop ... [https://cid-inc.com/blog/can-boosting-photosynthesis-efficiency-improve-crop-yields/]
• 21. Microbial-driven atmospheric CO2 conversion for large-scale ... [https://techfinder.stanford.edu/technology/microbial-driven-atmospheric-co2-conversion-large-scale-carbon-sequestration]
• 22. ESA - Organisation [https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Melissa/Organisation]
• 23. MELiSSA Pilot Plant [https://www.melissafoundation.org/page/melissa-pilot-plant]
• 24. The influence of different storage conditions on Limnospira ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12529360/]
• 25. Microbial applications for sustainable space exploration ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10284894/]
• 26. Air Revitalization for Vacuum Environments | T2 Portal [https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/MFS-TOPS-82]
• 27. Bio-electrochemical frameworks governing microbial fuel ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8981509/]
• 28. 3D-printed single-chamber microbial fuel cell biosensor ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221334372500973X]
• 29. Spirulina/Arthrospira/Limnospira—Three Names of the ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/13/17/2762]
• 30. Supporting Simultaneous Air Revitalization and Thermal ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.709746/full]
• 31. High density long-term cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris SAG ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31987484/]
• 32. Development and implementation of a simulated ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-024-00436-x]
• 33. Optimizing Chlorella vulgaris Cultivation to Enhance ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/13/16/2514]
• 34. Optimal growth conditions to enhance Chlorella vulgaris ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024079313]
• 35. Use of Photobioreactors in Regenerative Life Support ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8281973/]
• 36. Low-Gravity Bioreactor: Requirements + Design [https://2025.igem.wiki/ubc-vancouver/bioreactors/low-gravity-bioreactor-requirements--design]
• 37. Synthetic biology for space exploration | npj Microgravity [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-025-00488-7]
• 38. Lab-scale photobioreactor systems: principles , applications , and... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9033726/]
• 39. Flow visualisation in flat panel photobioreactors with ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25002841]
• 40. Complex mathematical analysis of photobioreactor system [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6999071/]
• 41. Bioreactors Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029 [https://www.technavio.com/report/bioreactors-market-industry-analysis]
• 42. Hidden Breakthroughs in Wastewater Treatment Technologies [https://susbio.in/wastewater-treatment-technologies-2025/]
• 43. Photosymbiosis for Biomedical Applications - PMC - NIH [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7573207/]
• 44. Thermal Management in ECLSS & ETCS Systems [https://www.1-act.com/resources/blog/thermal-management-in-eclss-and-etcs-systems/?srsltid=AfmBOopqIswvkxFmbFC6cLnctdvf9cocEbk5QkTAAkx51xwBY3TtLxFe]
• 45. Crew Studies Space Agriculture, Biotechnology to Promote ... [https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/spacestation/2025/02/11/crew-studies-space-agriculture-biotechnology/]
• 46. Chassis optimization as a cornerstone for the application of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4563238/]
• 47. Engineering and modification of microbial chassis for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405805X18300413]
• 48. Birth of a Photosynthetic : A MoClo Toolkit Enabling... Chassis [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30165733/]
• 49. ARTHROSPIRA-C space flight experiment: Validation of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S009457652400657X]
• 50. The Synthetic Biology Open Language [https://sbolstandard.org/]
• 51. Communicating Structure and Function in Synthetic ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8023477/]
• 52. The potential of far-red light-acclimating cyanobacteria to ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2025.1658632/full]
• 53. Exploiting Biocementation for Martian Construction [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117725012086]
• 54. Air Revitalization at ARC [https://www.nasa.gov/ames/space-biosciences/bioengineering-branch/air-revitalization-at-arc/]
• 55. Synthetic biology for space exploration - PMC - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12255725/]
• 56. Air Revitalization System [https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Node-3_Cupola/Air_Revitalization_System]
• 57. Microbial Responses to Microgravity and Other Low-Shear ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC419922/]
• 58. A new platform for studying photosynthesis and microalgae ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214552414000510]
• 59. Growth of microorganisms in an interfacially driven space ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7142127/]
• 60. Biofilm Control in Water Systems: Risks and Remediation [https://www.r2j.com/blog/biofilm-in-water/]
• 61. Bacteria & Biofilm Development In Open & Closed Water ... [https://www.bvwater.co.uk/b-v-chemicals-blogs/bacteria-and-biofilm-development]
• 62. Growing and Analyzing Static Biofilms - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4568995/]
• 63. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6133255/]
• 64. Development of standard protocols for biofilm-biomaterial ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X22000044]
• 65. Harnessing bioengineered microbes as a versatile platform ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9582011/]
• 66. The effect of increasing temperature on crop photosynthesis [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8023210/]
• 67. The effect of temperature on the photosynthetic carbon ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141113625002478]
• 68. Light-driven optimisation of high-value aromatic compound ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001987]
• 69. Mechanistic constraints on the trade-off between ... - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10796116/]
• 70. An Electro–Microbial Process to Uncouple Food ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/7/1002]
• 71. Post-harvest cleaning, sanitization, and microbial ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1308150/full]
• 72. Supporting Simultaneous Air Revitalization and Thermal ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8422879/]
• 73. Isolation, identification, and statistical optimization of a ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13399-022-02390-8]
• 74. Genomic insights into novel extremotolerant bacteria isolated ... [https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-025-02082-1]
• 75. Microbial Pathogenicity in Space - PMC - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069885/]
• 76. Post-harvest cleaning, sanitization, and microbial ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11502331/]
• 77. Post-harvest cleaning, sanitization, and microbial ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39464289/]
• 78. Post-harvest cleaning, sanitization, and microbial ... [https://read.qxmd.com/read/39464289/post-harvest-cleaning-sanitization-and-microbial-monitoring-of-soilless-nutrient-delivery-systems-for-sustainable-space-crop-production]
• 79. Phototrophic microorganisms in bioregenerative life ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576523003570]
• 80. 极端环境下微生物光合作用机制及其农业应用前景研究 [https://www.forwardpathway.com/174456]
• 81. 新聞訊息| 中研院首創「雙固碳系統」 登《科學》期刊 [https://www.sinica.edu.tw/news_content/55/3304]
• 82. 在微重力下研究“生环材”是怎样的体验 - 新闻 [https://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2025/1/537533.shtm]
• 83. 空间站在轨微生物防控技术研究进展 [http://www.ecorr.org.cn/dhTJDAOHANG/fhjs/jishuyingyong//2025-08-12/195863.html]
• 84. VEGGIE [https://science.nasa.gov/mission/veggie/]
• 85. Vegetable Production System [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetable_Production_System]
• 86. Veggie Plant Growth System Activated on International ... [https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/veggie-plant-growth-system-activated-on-international-space-station/]
• 87. Microbiological and Nutritional Analysis of Lettuce Crops ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7067979/]
• 88. E.9 Space Biology Advanced Plant Habitat No Longer ... [https://science.nasa.gov/researchers/solicitations/roses-2024/amendment-121-e-9-space-biology-advanced-plant-habitat-no-longer-available-for-proposed-iss-studies/]
• 89. Space Station Analysis Reveals Lack of Microbial Diversity ... [https://cmi.ucsd.edu/2025/02/27/space-station-analysis/]
• 90. Recent developments in the production and utilization of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10161259/]
• 91. Natural carbon fixation and advances in synthetic engineering ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173188/]
• 92. A review on recent advancements in biochemical fixation ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369703X24001530]
• 93. Boosting photosynthesis for carbon capture [https://www.mpi-marburg.mpg.de/1508768/2025-05-c]
• 94. Carbon Dioxide Bio-Capture and Organic ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/12/9/319]
• 95. Recent advancements in microbial carbon dioxide fixation [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc03349g]
• 96. Technology Readiness Levels [https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/somd/space-communications-navigation-program/technology-readiness-levels/]
• 97. Technology readiness level [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_readiness_level]
• 98. Toward sustainable space exploration: a roadmap for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10030976/]
• 99. Scientists uncover what delayed Earth's oxygen boom for a ... [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/11/251102011144.htm]