The Philadelphia Story of Modern Design
Exploring how the Philadelphia Museum of Art transformed from traditional craft repository to avant-garde design leader through Kathryn Hiesinger's research in Collecting Modern: Design at the Philadelphia Museum of Art Since 1876.
Walk through the grand neoclassical facade of the Philadelphia Museum of Artâa building itself conceived as a temple to artistic traditionâand you'll encounter a fish lamp crafted from cardboard and whimsy, a chess set designed by a Surrealist master, and a toilet elevated to artistic statement. This seemingly paradoxical marriage of historical architecture and progressive design forms the central narrative of Kathryn Bloom Hiesinger's seminal work, Collecting Modern: Design at the Philadelphia Museum of Art Since 1876. For over three decades, Hiesinger served as a curator at the museum, spearheading its efforts to document and acquire significant examples of contemporary design 6 .
The Philadelphia Museum of Art's neoclassical building provides a striking contrast to its modern design collections.
Modern design pieces like this challenge traditional boundaries between art and functionality.
The Philadelphia Museum of Art itself emerged from the 1876 Centennial Exposition with a practical mission: to improve industrial design through education, modeling itself after London's South Kensington Museum (now the Victoria & Albert Museum) 7 . Yet, as Hiesinger meticulously documents, this historically conservative institution would gradually transform into a renowned repository of avant-garde design, building bridges between Philadelphia's rich craft traditions and the cutting edge of modern form. Her book reveals how, starting from its late 19th-century origins, the museum consistently acquired important examples of contemporary design and decorative arts, tracking Philadelphia's gradual embrace of modernism through more than 300 color photographs of its impressive collection 6 .
Collecting Modern offers more than just an inventory of acquisitions; it presents a fascinating case study in how institutions evolve alongsideâand sometimes ahead ofâpublic taste.
Through Hiesinger's research, we witness how a museum founded to teach craftsmanship to industrial laborers became the home for luminous vases by Louis Comfort Tiffany, organic chairs by Charles and Ray Eames, and a decidedly anti-establishment fish lamp by Frank Gehry 6 . This article will explore the key concepts, historical turning points, and methodological innovations that Hiesinger identified in the museum's century-long journey to embrace the modern.
Hiesinger's research reveals a fundamental shift in the museum's philosophy. Initially focused on historical craftsmanship and industrial improvement, the institution began recognizing that "modern" design wasn't merely about aesthetic evolution but represented a complete rethinking of form, function, and materiality. The museum's collections gradually expanded to include objects that challenged traditional boundaries between fine art and practical design.
Several major collections propelled the museum's transition toward modernist design. In the 1950s, the museum acquired both the Walter and Louise Arensberg Collectionâincluding many works by Marcel Duchampâand the A. E. Gallatin Collection (also known as The Museum of Living Art), which collectively established the PMA as a major repository of modern and contemporary art 7 .
Perhaps the most telling example of the museum's evolving philosophy is its embrace of Marcel Duchamp's work. The PMA now houses the world's most extensive display of Duchamp's works, including his enigmatic last piece, Ãtant donnés, permanently installed in 1954 4 . This commitment to an artist who consistently challenged conventional definitions of art demonstrates how profoundly the institution had transformed from its craft-oriented origins.
Max Ernst's chess set exemplifies the museum's embrace of conceptual design.
Charles and Ray Eames' furniture represents human-centered modernism.
Frank Gehry's cardboard fish lamp challenges material conventions.
One of the most rigorous methodological frameworks that Hiesinger would have employedâand which the museum continues to practiceâis provenance research. This systematic investigation into the ownership history of artworks functions much like a scientific experiment, with clearly defined procedures, hypotheses, and analytical outcomes. Recent years have seen increased attention to this process, particularly regarding works that changed hands during World War II 1 .
The museum describes provenance research as "an essential component of museum practice" that sheds light on an artwork's "historical, social, and economic context" 1 . For Hiesinger's study of modern design, this methodology would have been crucial to establishing not just authenticity and legal title, but also the cultural pathways through which modernism entered museum collections.
The museum's research into World War II-era provenance provides a template for how this methodological "experiment" unfolds 1 :
Select works created before 1946 and acquired after 1932 that underwent or could have undergone a change of ownership between 1932 and 1946.
Scrutinize archival documents including sales records, gallery archives, exhibition catalogs, inheritance documents, and historical photographs.
List ownership history in chronological order, using specific punctuation to indicate relationships between owners.
Analyze the social and economic circumstances of each transfer, identifying potential forced sales or looting.
Determine appropriate action based on findings, which may include restitution to rightful owners or publication of findings.
Applied to modern design objects, this methodology has yielded significant discoveries. The museum's research has identified works that were stolen by the Nazi regime and later restituted, such as an important Italian pageant shield looted from KonopiÅ¡tÄ Castle in 1943, which was returned to the Czech Republic in 2021 1 .
| Artwork | Original Context | Research Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Italian pageant shield | KonopiÅ¡tÄ Castle, Czech Republic | Looted by Nazi government in 1943 |
| Pensive Young Brunette (Corot) | Private French collection | Seized by Nazi Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg |
| The Nude Reclining by the Sea (Courbet) | Private French collection | Selected for Hermann Göring's personal collection |
| Composition with Blue (Mondrian) | Likely owned by artist | Confiscated from German museum as "degenerate art" |
Equally revealing has been research into works deemed "degenerate" by the Nazi government. The museum discovered that works like Piet Mondrian's Composition with Blue and El Lissitzky's Proun 2 were confiscated from German museums in the 1930s, not because they belonged to persecuted individuals, but because the Nazi government denounced modernist art as "degenerate" 1 . These works were often sold abroad to raise foreign currency, entering the international art market and eventually reaching American museums like Philadelphia's.
Building on the methodological approach to provenance research, Hiesinger's work exemplifies the broader "curatorial toolkit" required for documenting and analyzing modern design. These specialized approaches transform the curator into both detective and scientist, applying rigorous techniques to understand and authenticate collections.
| Research Tool | Function | Application Example |
|---|---|---|
| Provenance Documentation | Establishes ownership history and legal title | Tracing works potentially looted during WWII 1 |
| Material Analysis | Identifies physical composition and manufacturing techniques | Differentiating between early and late production versions of designer furniture |
| Archival Research | Contextualizes objects within historical records | Studying museum archives to determine acquisition circumstances 7 |
| Comparative Analysis | Places objects within broader design movements | Linking acquisitions to developments in Modernism, Art Deco, or Contemporary design 6 |
| Oral History | Captures firsthand accounts of design and acquisition | Interviewing donors, designers, or previous owners to fill documentation gaps |
Scientific examination of materials and construction techniques reveals manufacturing methods and authenticity.
Meticulous examination of historical documents provides context for acquisition decisions and object histories.
Placing objects within broader design movements reveals patterns of influence and innovation.
Hiesinger's research documents how the museum's design collection evolved in response to both changing artistic movements and institutional priorities. This chronological development reveals patterns in how the museum gradually expanded its definition of what constituted "collectible" design.
| Time Period | Key Acquisitions/Collections | Historical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1876-1900 | Objects from Centennial Exposition, Clara Jessup Moore collection | Foundation focused on industrial design and craftsmanship 7 |
| Early 1900s | John D. McIlhenny (Oriental carpets), George Grey Barnard (sculpture) | Expanding beyond industrial arts to include diverse decorative arts 2 |
| 1950s | Walter and Louise Arensberg Collection, A.E. Gallatin Collection | Transformative embrace of modern and contemporary art, including Duchamp 7 |
| 1960s-1970s | Carroll S. Tyson Jr. collection, Samuel S. White III and Vera White collections | Continued expansion of modern holdings amid building renovations 2 |
| Contemporary Era | Frank Gehry fish lamp, Gio Ponti toilet, Eames chairs | Explicit embrace of conceptual, surreal, and postmodern design 6 |
The museum's initial collections emphasized craftsmanship and industrial design improvement.
Recent acquisitions demonstrate the museum's embrace of conceptual and boundary-pushing design.
Kathryn Hiesinger's Collecting Modern ultimately reveals how the Philadelphia Museum of Art transitioned from an institution focused primarily on historical preservation to one that engages with design as a living, evolving discipline. The museum's willingness to acquire and exhibit contemporary designâeven when it challenged conventional aestheticsârepresents a commitment to the idea that museums should not merely preserve the past but also document the present and help shape future understandings of our material world.
This legacy continues today through the museum's ongoing acquisitions and exhibitions. The Frank Gehry-designed expansion currently underwayâwhich will add 78,000 square feet of gallery spaceâensures that the museum continues to evolve physically alongside its collections 4 .
Just as the original neoclassical building provided a provocative contrast to the modern works within, these new spaces will continue the conversation between historical context and contemporary creation that Hiesinger so meticulously documented.
The story of modern design collecting at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, as detailed in Hiesinger's work, offers a compelling model for how cultural institutions can navigate the delicate balance between preservation and innovation.
By treating design not as a static category but as a dynamic field of human creativity, the museum has transformed itself from a temple of tradition into a laboratory for understanding how objects shape, and are shaped by, the contemporary world.
Collecting Modern: Design at the Philadelphia Museum of Art Since 1876 stands as both a record of this transformative journey and a contribution to the very tradition it documentsâa meta-collection of ideas about how we assign value to the objects that define our times.
The Philadelphia Museum of Art continues to evolve, embracing new forms of design while honoring its historical mission.