Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of NBS Disease Resistance Genes Across 34 Plant Species: Evolution, Diversity, and Function

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive genomic analysis of Nucleotide-Binding Site (NBS) disease resistance genes across a broad phylogenetic spectrum of 34 plant species, from mosses to monocots and dicots. We explore the extensive diversification of 12,820 identified NBS genes into 168 distinct structural classes, revealing both conserved and species-specific domain architectures. The study details the evolutionary mechanisms—including tandem and whole-genome duplications—driving NBS gene family expansion and contraction. It further integrates transcriptomic and functional validation data, demonstrating the critical role of specific NBS orthogroups in conferring resistance to biotic stresses like the cotton leaf curl disease. This synthesis offers invaluable insights for researchers and drug development professionals aiming to harness plant R-genes for crop improvement and biomedical applications.

Unveiling the Landscape: Diversity and Evolutionary History of NBS Resistance Genes in Land Plants

Nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, also known as NLRs (NOD-like receptors), constitute the largest and most prominent class of plant disease resistance (R) genes. These genes encode intracellular immune receptors that enable plants to detect pathogen effectors and activate robust defense responses [1]. The proteins they encode are characterized by a conserved tripartite domain architecture: a variable amino-terminal domain, a central nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain, and a carboxy-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain [2] [1]. To date, over 300 R genes have been cloned from various plant species, with approximately 60% belonging to the NBS-LRR family [3] [4]. These proteins function as essential components of the plant's effector-triggered immunity (ETI) system, recognizing specific pathogen effectors either directly or indirectly and initiating signaling cascades that often culminate in a hypersensitive response (HR) to restrict pathogen spread [5] [4]. The NBS-LRR gene family exhibits remarkable diversity and rapid evolution, making it a central focus of research in plant-pathogen interactions and disease resistance breeding.

Classification and Domain Architecture of NBS-LRR Genes

Major Subfamilies and Structural Features

NBS-LRR genes are primarily classified into distinct subfamilies based on their N-terminal domain configurations, which also correlate with specific signaling pathways [1]. The two major subfamilies are TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL) and CC-NBS-LRR (CNL), with an additional smaller subfamily known as RPW8-NBS-LRR (RNL) [6] [7].

• TNL Genes: Characterized by an N-terminal Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain. These genes are prevalent in dicotyledonous plants but are completely absent from monocots, including cereals [7] [1] [5].
• CNL Genes: Feature a coiled-coil (CC) domain at the N-terminus. This subfamily is found in both monocots and dicots and represents the dominant type in many plant species [1].
• RNL Genes: Contain a Resistance to Powdery Mildew 8 (RPW8) domain and often function as helper proteins in signaling networks [6] [7].

In addition to these full-length genes, plant genomes contain numerous NBS-encoding genes that represent truncated forms, lacking one or more of the canonical domains (e.g., TIR-NBS, CC-NBS, or NBS-only proteins), which may function as adaptors or regulators [8] [1].

Table 1: Classification and Distribution of NBS-LRR Genes in Various Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NBS Genes	TNL Genes	CNL Genes	Other/Truncated	Key Features
Arabidopsis thaliana (Dicot)	189 [4]	Present [1]	Present [1]	58 related proteins [1]	Model dicot with both TNL and CNL subfamilies.
Vernicia montana (Tung tree, Dicot)	149 [8]	3 TNL; 12 with TIR domain total [8]	9 CNL; 98 with CC domain total [8]	Includes CC-NBS, TIR-NBS, NBS-LRR, NBS [8]	Resistant to Fusarium wilt; possesses TIR domains.
Vernicia fordii (Tung tree, Dicot)	90 [8]	0 [8]	12 CNL; 49 with CC domain total [8]	Includes CC-NBS, NBS-LRR, NBS [8]	Susceptible to Fusarium wilt; lost TIR domains.
Nicotiana tabacum (Tobacco, Dicot)	603 [9]	64 TNL; 9 TIR-NBS [9]	74 CNL; 150 CC-NBS [9]	306 NBS-only [9]	Allotetraploid model for disease resistance studies.
Dendrobium officinale (Orchid, Monocot)	74 [5]	0 [5]	10 CNL [5]	Various non-NBS-LRR types [5]	Represents monocots where TNL genes are absent.
Fragaria spp. (Strawberry, Dicot)	Varies by species [7]	Present, but proportion varies [7]	Present, >50% of NLRs [7]	RNL subfamily identified [7]	Non-TNLs show dominant expression and positive selection.

Functional Domains and Their Roles

The modular structure of NBS-LRR proteins allows for specialized functions within the plant immune response:

• N-terminal Domain (TIR/CC/RPW8): Primarily involved in protein-protein interactions and initiating downstream signaling cascades. The TIR and CC domains define distinct signaling pathways [3] [1].
• Central NBS (NB-ARC) Domain: This domain contains conserved motifs (e.g., P-loop, Kinase-2, GLPL) that bind and hydrolyze ATP/GTP. It acts as a molecular switch, with nucleotide-dependent conformational changes regulating the protein's activation state [3] [1] [4].
• C-terminal LRR Domain: This domain is crucial for pathogen recognition specificity, facilitating both protein-ligand and protein-protein interactions. The LRR region is highly variable and often under diversifying selection, which generates diversity in pathogen effector recognition [8] [3] [1].

Genomic Distribution and Evolutionary Analysis Across Species

Variation in Gene Family Size and Evolutionary Patterns

Comparative genomics across a wide range of plant species has revealed that NBS-LRR genes constitute one of the largest and most variable gene families in plants [6] [1]. A comprehensive analysis of 34 plant species identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes, which were classified into 168 distinct domain architecture classes, revealing significant diversity among species [6]. The size of the NBS-LRR repertoire varies dramatically, from as few as 2 genes in the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii to over 2,000 in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) [6] [9]. This expansion results primarily from duplication events, including whole-genome duplication (WGD) and small-scale duplications (SSD) such as tandem and segmental duplications [6] [9].

Table 2: Evolutionary Patterns and Selection Pressures on NBS-LRR Genes

Evolutionary Aspect	Findings	Example Species/Study
Gene Family Size	Varies widely; one of the largest plant gene families.	73 in Akebia trifoliata to 2151 in Triticum aestivum [9].
Major Expansion Mechanism	Whole-genome duplication (WGD) and small-scale duplications (SSD).	WGD significantly contributed to expansion in Nicotiana tabacum [9].
Genomic Organization	Frequently clustered in the genome.	50.7% of cabbage NBS-LRR genes exist in 27 clusters [3].
Selection Pressure	Generally under negative/purifying selection with positive selection on LRR.	Cabbage NBS-LRRs evolved under negative selection [3].
Subfamily Evolution	Differential selection pressures on TNLs and non-TNLs (CNLs/RNLs).	In wild strawberries, non-TNLs show more positive selection [7].
Domain Loss	Common evolutionary event, leading to truncated forms and new functions.	Genus Dendrobium shows NBS gene degeneration and type changing [5].

Chromosomal Distribution and Gene Clustering

NBS-LRR genes are frequently non-randomly distributed across plant genomes, often forming clusters on chromosomes. These clusters arise from both segmental and tandem duplication events [1]. For instance, in cabbage (Brassica oleracea), 50.7% of the 138 identified NBS-LRR genes are organized into 27 clusters, where a cluster is defined as two or more NBS-LRR genes located within 200 kilobases of each other and separated by no more than eight non-NBS genes [3]. Similar clustering patterns have been observed in diverse species, including strawberries and tobacco [7] [9]. This clustering facilitates the generation of new resistance specificities through unequal crossing-over and gene conversion, contributing to the evolutionary "arms race" between plants and their pathogens [1].

Experimental Protocols for Identification and Functional Characterization

Genome-Wide Identification Pipeline

The standard workflow for identifying NBS-LRR genes at a genome-wide scale relies on bioinformatic tools using conserved domain models.

Functional Validation Using Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS)

To confirm the function of identified NBS-LRR genes in disease resistance, functional assays are essential. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful tool for this purpose.

• Objective: To rapidly validate the role of a candidate NBS-LRR gene in conferring resistance to a specific pathogen [8] [6].
• Procedure:
  • A fragment (typically 200-500 bp) of the target NBS-LRR gene is cloned into a VIGS vector (e.g., TRV-based vector).
  • The recombinant vector is introduced into plants of a resistant genotype via Agrobium tumefaciens-mediated infiltration.
  • Control plants are infiltrated with an empty vector.
  • After allowing 2-3 weeks for gene silencing to establish, plants are challenged with the target pathogen.
  • Disease symptoms, pathogen biomass, and expression levels of the target gene are monitored in silenced versus control plants.
• Key Findings:
  • In Vernicia montana, silencing of Vm019719 (a CNL gene) led to compromised resistance to Fusarium wilt, confirming its essential role in defense [8].
  • In cotton, silencing of a GaNBS gene (OG2) demonstrated its putative role in reducing virus titer [6].

Signaling Pathways and Regulatory Mechanisms in Plant Immunity

NBS-LRR proteins are central components of Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI). Their activation initiates complex signaling cascades that orchestrate the plant's defense.

Key Regulatory Mechanisms

• Transcriptional Regulation: The expression of NBS-LRR genes is modulated by transcription factors and hormonal signals. For example, Vm019719 in Vernicia montana is activated by the transcription factor VmWRKY64 [8]. Promoter analyses often reveal cis-elements responsive to salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid, and other stress signals [3] [4].
• Post-translational Regulation: Nitric Oxide (NO) has been identified as a key regulator of NBS-LRR activity. NO can mediate post-translational modification of these proteins through S-nitrosylation, influencing their function and the ensuing immune response [4]. Furthermore, certain NBS-LRR proteins are held in an auto-inhibited state in the absence of pathogens, with the NBS domain acting as a molecular switch that cycles between ADP-bound (inactive) and ATP-bound (active) states [1].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents and Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Resources for NBS-LRR Gene Research

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Specific Examples & Notes
HMMER Suite	Bioinformatics identification of NBS domains using Hidden Markov Models.	Use Pfam model PF00931 (NB-ARC) with E-value cutoff < 1e-10 [8] [3].
VIGS Vectors	Functional validation through transient gene silencing.	TRV-based vectors; effective in tung tree, cotton, tobacco [8] [6].
RNA-seq Data	Expression profiling under biotic/abiotic stress and across tissues.	Key resources: IPF database, CottonFGD, NCBI SRA (e.g., SRP310543) [6] [9].
Pathogen Strains	Biological assays for phenotyping resistance.	Fusarium oxysporum for wilt diseases, Botrytis cinerea for gray mold [8] [7].
S-Nitrosocysteine (CysNO)	Chemical treatment to study Nitric Oxide (NO) signaling in immunity.	Used to infiltrate leaves (e.g., 1mM for 6h) to identify NO-responsive NBS-LRR genes [4].
Linoleyl oleate	Linoleyl oleate, MF:C36H66O2, MW:530.9 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Octadecaprenyl-MPDA	Octadecaprenyl-MPDA, MF:C90H147O4P, MW:1324.1 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Genome-Wide Identification of 12,820 NBS Genes Across 34 Species from Mosses to Higher Plants

This comparative guide presents a comprehensive analysis of nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes across 34 plant species, from bryophytes to higher plants. The study identifies 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes classified into 168 distinct architectural classes, revealing significant diversification in domain architecture patterns across evolutionary lineages. Evolutionary analysis identified 603 orthogroups with both core conserved and species-specific lineages, while expression profiling demonstrated the responsiveness of key orthogroups to biotic and abiotic stresses. Functional validation through virus-induced gene silencing established the role of specific NBS genes in viral disease resistance. This work provides an extensive framework for understanding the molecular evolution of plant immune system components and offers valuable data for crop improvement strategies.

Plant immunity relies on a sophisticated network of resistance (R) genes that recognize pathogen effectors and initiate defense responses. Among these, genes containing nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domains constitute one of the largest and most critical superfamilies involved in plant-pathogen interactions [6]. The NBS domain forms the core signaling module of nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) proteins, which function as intracellular immune receptors in effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [9]. These proteins typically exhibit a modular architecture consisting of an N-terminal domain, a central NBS region, and C-terminal LRR domains, with classification into subfamilies (TNL, CNL, RNL) based on N-terminal domain variations [10].

Recent advances in sequencing technologies have enabled genome-wide identification of NBS-encoding genes across diverse plant taxa, revealing remarkable variation in family size and composition. While vertebrate genomes typically contain approximately 20 NLR genes, plant genomes can harbor hundreds to thousands of these genes [6]. This expansion is particularly pronounced in angiosperms, with bryophytes like Physcomitrella patens containing only around 25 NLRs compared to thousands in some flowering plants [6].

This study provides a systematic comparison of NBS genes across 34 species spanning the evolutionary spectrum from mosses to monocots and dicots. By integrating identification, classification, evolutionary analysis, and functional validation, we offer a comprehensive resource for understanding the diversification of plant immune receptors and their potential applications in crop protection.

Results

Genomic Distribution and Architectural Diversity of NBS Genes

Our genome-wide analysis identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species, representing a remarkable expansion compared to ancestral lineages [6]. The number of NBS genes varied substantially between species, reflecting differential evolutionary trajectories:

Table 1: NBS Gene Distribution Across Selected Plant Families

Plant Family	Species	NBS Gene Count	Notable Features
Malvaceae	Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)	Part of 12,820 total	Multiple architectures
Solanaceae	Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)	603	Allotetraploid expansion
Solanaceae	N. sylvestris	344	Diploid progenitor
Solanaceae	N. tomentosiformis	279	Diploid progenitor
Rosaceae	12 species surveyed	2,188	Diverse evolutionary patterns
Passifloraceae	Passiflora edulis (purple)	25 CNL genes	Stress-responsive members
Passifloraceae	P. edulis f. flavicarpa (yellow)	21 CNL genes	Fewer CNLs than purple type
Lamiaceae	Salvia miltiorrhiza	196	Medicinal plant with reduced TNL/RNL
Asteraceae	Hirschfeldia incana	98 NLR genes	Wild relative with R-gene potential

Classification based on domain architecture revealed 168 distinct structural classes, encompassing both classical and novel configurations [6]. Beyond the well-characterized NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, and TIR-NBS-LRR architectures, we identified several species-specific structural patterns including TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, and Sugar_tr-NBS [6]. This architectural diversity suggests functional specialization and adaptive evolution in different plant lineages.

Evolutionary Analysis and Orthogroup Distribution

Phylogenetic analysis of NBS genes across the 34 species identified 603 orthogroups (OGs) with distinct evolutionary patterns [6]. These included:

• Core orthogroups: Widely distributed across multiple species (e.g., OG0, OG1, OG2)
• Unique orthogroups: Species-specific or limited to few species (e.g., OG80, OG82)

The expansion of NBS gene families primarily occurred through duplication events, with both whole-genome duplication (WGD) and small-scale duplications (SSD) contributing to family size variation [6]. In Nicotiana tabacum, approximately 76.62% of NBS genes could be traced to their parental genomes (N. sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis), with WGD significantly contributing to gene family expansion [9].

Evolutionary patterns varied substantially across plant families. In Rosaceae species, distinct evolutionary trajectories were observed: Rosa chinensis exhibited "continuous expansion," while Fragaria vesca showed "expansion followed by contraction, then further expansion," and three Prunus species shared "early sharp expansion to abrupt shrinking" patterns [11].

Expression Profiling Under Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

Expression analysis across multiple species and stress conditions revealed that specific NBS orthogroups display characteristic expression patterns:

Table 2: Expression Patterns of Key NBS Orthogroups Under Stress Conditions

Orthogroup	Expression Pattern	Stress Conditions	Biological Significance
OG2	Upregulated in tolerant genotypes	Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD)	Putative role in virus resistance [6]
OG6	Differential expression	Various biotic and abiotic stresses	Stress-responsive functions
OG15	Tissue-specific regulation	Multiple stress conditions	Potential specialized roles
PeCNL3	Differentially expressed	Cucumber mosaic virus, cold stress	Multi-stress responsiveness [12]
PeCNL13	Responsive to pathogens	Cucumber mosaic virus infection	Disease resistance candidate
PeCNL14	Cold and virus induction	Multiple stress conditions	Broad stress adaptation

In passion fruit, transcriptome data identified PeCNL3, PeCNL13, and PeCNL14 as differentially expressed under both Cucumber mosaic virus infection and cold stress, suggesting their role in multiple stress response pathways [12]. Machine learning approaches further validated PeCNL3 as a multi-stress responsive gene [12].

Genetic Variation and Functional Validation

Genetic variation analysis between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions identified substantial differences in NBS genes [6]. The tolerant Mac7 accession contained 6,583 unique variants in NBS genes, compared to 5,173 variants in the susceptible Coker312, suggesting potential functional significance in disease resistance.

Protein interaction studies demonstrated strong binding of specific NBS proteins with ADP/ATP and various core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus [6]. Functional validation through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton confirmed its essential role in limiting viral accumulation, providing direct evidence for its function in disease resistance [6].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Genome-Wide Identification of NBS Genes

The standard pipeline for genome-wide identification of NBS genes involves multiple bioinformatic approaches:

Protocol 1: Identification and Classification Pipeline

• Data Collection: Genome assemblies and annotated protein sequences are obtained from public databases (NCBI, Phytozome, Plaza) [6]. The study analyzed 39 land plants ranging from green algae to higher plant families, selected based on phylogenetic diversity and ploidy level.

• HMMER Search: The PfamScan.pl script with default e-value (1.1e-50) using the Pfam-A_hmm model is employed to identify genes containing NB-ARC domains [6] [9]. The hidden Markov model PF00931 (NB-ARC domain) serves as the primary search query.

• Domain Validation: Candidate genes are verified using multiple domain databases (Pfam, SMART, CDD) to confirm the presence of characteristic NBS domains and associated decoy domains [12] [10]. The NCBI Conserved Domain Database is particularly valuable for this validation step.

• Architecture Classification: Genes are classified based on domain composition using established classification systems [6]. Categories include:

  • Classical architectures: NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR, CC-NBS, CC-NBS-LRR
  • Species-specific patterns: TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, Sugar_tr-NBS

Evolutionary and Phylogenetic Analysis

Protocol 2: Evolutionary Analysis Workflow

• Orthogroup Delineation: OrthoFinder v2.5.1 with DIAMOND for sequence similarity searches and MCL clustering algorithm is used to identify orthogroups [6]. This approach facilitates the comparison of NBS genes across multiple species.

• Multiple Sequence Alignment: MAFFT 7.0 or MUSCLE v3.8.31 performs alignment of NBS protein sequences under default parameters [6] [9]. For large datasets, ClustalW implemented in MEGA software provides an efficient alternative.

• Phylogenetic Reconstruction: Maximum likelihood trees are constructed using FastTreeMP or MEGA11 with 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess node support [6] [9]. The Jones-Taylor-Thornton model is commonly employed for protein evolution.

• Duplication Analysis: MCScanX detects segmental and tandem duplications across genomes, while Ka/Ks calculations identify selection pressures using KaKs_Calculator 2.0 [9].

Expression Analysis and Functional Validation

Protocol 3: Expression Profiling and Validation

• Transcriptomic Data Collection: RNA-seq data are retrieved from specialized databases (IPF database, CottonFGD, Cottongen, NCBI SRA) and categorized into tissue-specific, abiotic stress-specific, and biotic stress-specific expression profiles [6].

• Differential Expression Analysis: Processed RNA-seq data (FPKM or TPM values) are analyzed using appropriate pipelines. For novel data, tools like Hisat2 (alignment), Cufflinks (transcript quantification), and Cuffdiff (differential expression) are employed [9].

• Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS):

  • Target gene fragments (e.g., GaNBS from OG2) are cloned into VIGS vectors
  • Recombinant vectors are introduced into plants through Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration
  • Silenced plants are challenged with pathogens to assess functional roles
  • Viral titers and disease symptoms are quantified to measure resistance [6]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents and Resources for NBS Gene Research

Category	Specific Resource	Application	Reference
Domain Databases	Pfam (PF00931)	NBS domain identification	[6]
	NCBI CDD	Domain verification	[9]
	InterPro	Integrated domain analysis	[12]
Software Tools	OrthoFinder v2.5.1	Orthogroup analysis	[6]
	MCScanX	Duplication detection	[9]
	MEME Suite	Motif discovery	[11]
	MEGA11	Phylogenetic analysis	[9]
Biological Materials	Coker 312 (cotton)	Susceptible accession	[6]
	Mac7 (cotton)	Tolerant accession	[6]
	N. bentoniana	VIGS validation	[6]
Experimental Methods	VIGS system	Functional validation	[6]
	RNA-seq libraries	Expression profiling	[6]
	Yeast two-hybrid	Protein interactions	[6]
C.I. Mordant red 94	C.I. Mordant red 94, MF:C17H14N5NaO7S, MW:455.4 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
Fusarielin A	Fusarielin A, CAS:162341-17-5, MF:C25H38O4, MW:402.6 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

Discussion

Evolutionary Dynamics of NBS Genes

Our comparative analysis across 34 species reveals that NBS genes have undergone complex evolutionary patterns characterized by frequent gene duplication and loss events. The "birth-and-death" evolution model predominates, with gene duplication creating new resistance specificities and selective pressures driving diversification [13]. The significant variation in NBS gene number - from just 25 in the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens to thousands in some angiosperms - highlights the differential evolutionary trajectories across plant lineages [6].

Whole-genome duplication (WGD) plays a particularly important role in NBS gene family expansion, as evidenced by the allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum, which contains approximately the combined NBS gene count of its diploid progenitors [9]. However, post-duplication processes, including fractionation and pseudogenization, subsequently shape the functional repertoire, leading to distinct evolutionary patterns even among closely related species.

Functional Implications for Crop Improvement

The identification of core orthogroups (OG0, OG1, OG2) conserved across multiple species suggests fundamental immune functions, while species-specific orthogroups may represent adaptations to particular pathogen pressures [6]. The genetic variation between susceptible and tolerant cotton accessions, with 6,583 unique NBS variants in the tolerant Mac7 compared to 5,173 in susceptible Coker312, provides valuable candidates for marker-assisted breeding [6].

Expression profiling under stress conditions further identifies promising candidates for crop improvement. The responsiveness of OG2, OG6, and OG15 to various biotic and abiotic stresses suggests their potential in developing climate-resilient crops with broad-spectrum resistance [6]. Similarly, in passion fruit, PeCNL3, PeCNL13, and PeCNL14 respond to both viral infection and cold stress, indicating their utility in multiple stress tolerance breeding programs [12].

Comparative Genomics Insights

The reduction or complete loss of specific NBS subfamilies in certain lineages provides insights into evolutionary constraints and functional redundancy. In monocots such as rice, wheat, and maize, complete absence of TNL genes contrasts with their prevalence in dicots, suggesting divergent evolutionary paths [10]. Similarly, Salvia miltiorrhiza shows marked reduction in TNL and RNL subfamily members compared to other eudicots [10].

Wild relatives of cultivated species often harbor greater NBS gene diversity, as demonstrated by Hirschfeldia incana, a wild Brassica relative containing 914 resistance gene analogs [14]. These wild germplasm resources represent valuable genetic reservoirs for improving disease resistance in related crops through breeding or biotechnological approaches.

This comprehensive analysis of 12,820 NBS genes across 34 plant species provides unprecedented insights into the evolution and diversification of plant immune receptors. The identification of 168 architectural classes reveals substantial structural diversity, while evolutionary analysis uncovers both conserved and lineage-specific patterns of gene family expansion and contraction.

Functional characterization demonstrates the importance of specific orthogroups in disease resistance, with practical applications for crop improvement. The integration of comparative genomics, expression profiling, and functional validation establishes a robust framework for future investigations of plant immunity mechanisms.

The resources and methodologies presented here will facilitate targeted breeding efforts and biotechnological approaches to enhance crop resilience in the face of evolving pathogen threats and changing environmental conditions. Future research should focus on functional characterization of specific NBS genes and their incorporation into breeding programs for sustainable agricultural production.

The nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes represent a critical superfamily of resistance (R) genes that mediate plant defense mechanisms against pathogens [15]. This comprehensive analysis delves into the extensive diversification of these genes across the plant kingdom, identifying a remarkable 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species, spanning from primitive mosses to advanced monocots and dicots [15]. The central finding of this research is the classification of these genes into 168 distinct structural classes, revealing a vast architectural landscape that extends far beyond the classical TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL) and Coiled-Coil-NBS-LRR (CNL) models [15]. This classification provides an unprecedented resource for understanding plant immunity evolution and offers new genetic targets for crop improvement and drug discovery initiatives.

Comparative Genomic Analysis of NBS Domain Architectures

Methodology for Genome-Wide Identification and Classification

The identification and systematic classification of NBS genes followed a robust bioinformatics pipeline [15].

• Data Collection: Researchers selected 39 land plants representing diverse families (Amborellaceae, Brassicaceae, Poaceae, etc.) and ploidy levels (haploid, diploid, tetraploid). The latest genome assemblies were acquired from public databases like NCBI, Phytozome, and Plaza [15].
• Gene Identification: The PfamScan.pl HMM search script was employed to screen for genes containing the NBS (NB-ARC) domain, using a strict e-value cutoff of 1.1e-50. All genes possessing the NB-ARC domain were classified as NBS genes [15].
• Classification System: A domain architecture-based classification method was utilized, whereby genes sharing similar domain organization were grouped into the same class. This approach allowed for the discovery of both classical and species-specific novel structural patterns [15].

Spectrum of Classical and Novel Structural Classes

The study uncovered significant diversity in NBS gene architecture, which was categorized into 168 different classes. The table below summarizes the key types of domain architectures discovered.

Table 1: Classification of NBS Domain Architectures Across Plant Species

Architecture Type	Examples	Key Characteristics
Classical	NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR	Well-characterized domain combinations forming the core of plant immune receptors.
Species-Specific Novel	TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, Sugar_tr-NBS	Unusual domain fusions suggesting specialized functional adaptations in specific plant lineages.

This diversification is driven by gene duplication events, including whole-genome duplication (WGD) and small-scale duplications (SSD) such as tandem, segmental, and transposon-mediated duplications [15]. The expansion of this gene family is particularly pronounced in flowering plants, contrasting with the small NLR repertoires found in ancestral lineages like bryophytes [15].

Orthogroup Analysis and Evolutionary Divergence

Orthogroup Clustering and Functional Conservation

To elucidate the evolution of NBS genes, researchers performed orthogroup (OG) analysis using OrthoFinder. This identified 603 orthogroups, which were categorized as [15]:

• Core Orthogroups: Widely conserved across multiple species (e.g., OG0, OG1, OG2).
• Unique Orthogroups: Highly specific to particular species (e.g., OG80, OG82).

Tandem duplications were a significant feature of these orthogroups, contributing to the rapid evolution and species-specific adaptation of the NBS gene repertoire [15].

Expression Profiling Under Biotic and Abiotic Stress

Transcriptomic analyses were conducted to link evolutionary conservation with functional relevance. Data from various RNA-seq databases revealed that specific orthogroups, including OG2, OG6, and OG15, were putatively upregulated across different plant tissues under diverse biotic and abiotic stresses [15]. This suggests that these core orthogroups play a fundamental role in plant stress responses. The analysis included studies on cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), comparing susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions [15].

Experimental Validation of NBS Gene Function

Genetic Variation and Protein Interaction Studies

A critical step in validating the functional importance of NBS genes involved analyzing genetic variation and molecular interactions.

• Variant Analysis: Comparison between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) cotton accessions identified a higher number of unique genetic variants in the NBS genes of the tolerant Mac7 line (6,583 variants) compared to the susceptible Coker 312 (5,173 variants) [15].
• Interaction Studies: Protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction experiments demonstrated strong binding between putative NBS proteins and ADP/ATP, as well as with core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus. This indicates a direct mechanistic role for these NBS proteins in pathogen recognition and defense signaling [15].

Functional Characterization via Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS)

The role of a specific NBS gene, GaNBS (OG2), was functionally validated in resistant cotton using Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS). Silencing this gene compromised the plant's resistance, demonstrating its putative role in controlling viral titers [15]. This experiment provides direct evidence for the role of a specific NBS orthogroup in disease resistance.

Table 2: Experimental Findings from Functional Validation Studies

Experimental Approach	Key Finding	Research Implication
Genetic Variant Analysis	6,583 unique variants in tolerant Mac7 vs. 5,173 in susceptible Coker 312.	Suggests a genetic basis for disease tolerance linked to NBS gene diversity.
Protein Interaction	Strong NBS protein binding with ADP/ATP and viral proteins.	Indicates a direct role in pathogen sensing and energy-dependent defense signaling.
VIGS (GaNBS/OG2)	Increased viral titer after silencing confirmed gene's role in resistance.	Provides causal evidence for the function of a specific NBS orthogroup.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful research in this field relies on a suite of specialized reagents and computational tools. The following table details key resources used in the featured genome-wide comparative study.

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Resources for NBS Gene Analysis

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application in NBS Gene Research
PfamScan.pl HMM Script	Identifies NBS (NB-ARC) domains in protein sequences with high specificity using hidden Markov models.
OrthoFinder Package	Clusters genes into orthogroups across species to infer evolutionary relationships.
MAFFT 7.0	Performs multiple sequence alignments for phylogenetic analysis and domain comparison.
FastTreeMP	Constructs maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees to visualize gene family evolution.
RNA-seq Datasets (e.g., IPF Database)	Enables expression profiling of NBS genes across different tissues and stress conditions.
VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing)	A key functional genomics tool for validating the role of candidate NBS genes in plant immunity.
Sosimerasib	Sosimerasib, CAS:2839563-01-6, MF:C36H39ClFN7O4, MW:688.2 g/mol
Hpk1-IN-54	Hpk1-IN-54, MF:C32H34FN7O3, MW:583.7 g/mol

Visualizing the Research Workflow

The diagram below outlines the comprehensive experimental and computational workflow used to identify, classify, and validate NBS genes across plant species, from initial data collection to functional characterization.

This systematic comparison underscores the immense structural and functional diversity of NBS genes, encapsulated in the 168 distinct classes identified. The journey from classical TNL/CNL architectures to novel, species-specific domain combinations highlights a dynamic evolutionary landscape shaped by duplication events and natural selection. The integration of genomic, transcriptomic, and functional data—notably the validation of GaNBS (OG2) via VIGS—provides a robust framework for understanding the molecular basis of plant disease resistance. This research lays a solid foundation for future applications in developing disease-resistant crops and exploring novel protein architectures for therapeutic design.

Phylogenetic Distribution and Patterns of Gene Family Expansion in Diploid and Polyploid Species

Gene duplication serves as a fundamental evolutionary process that provides raw genetic material for the emergence of novel functions and adaptive complexity. The expansion and contraction of gene families across diploid and polyploid species represent dynamic genomic phenomena that reflect selective pressures and evolutionary trajectories [16]. Among the diverse gene families in plants, the nucleotide-binding site (NBS)-encoding gene family constitutes one of the largest and most critical classes of disease resistance (R) genes, playing pivotal roles in plant immunity through effector-triggered immunity (ETI) systems [17] [6]. The NBS gene family exhibits remarkable variation in size, composition, and evolutionary patterns across the plant kingdom, with recent research identifying 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 species spanning from mosses to monocots and dicots [6].

The comparative analysis of gene family expansion in diploid and polyploid species provides crucial insights into evolutionary genomics, particularly regarding how genome duplication events influence genetic repertoire and functional diversification. This review synthesizes current understanding of phylogenetic distribution patterns, evolutionary dynamics, and experimental approaches for investigating gene family expansion, with specific emphasis on the NBS gene family across diverse plant lineages. Through systematic comparison of diploid and polyploid species, we aim to elucidate the complex interplay between genome duplication, selective pressures, and functional specialization that shapes gene family evolution.

Comparative Genomic Analysis of NBS Gene Family Across Species

Genomic Distribution and Architectural Diversity

The NBS gene family demonstrates extensive diversity in genomic organization and architectural composition across plant species. A comprehensive investigation across 34 land plant species identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes classified into 168 distinct classes with numerous novel domain architecture patterns [6]. These encompass both classical structural patterns (NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR) and species-specific configurations (TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, Sugar_tr-NBS), revealing significant diversity among plant species.

The chromosomal distribution of NBS genes frequently exhibits clustering patterns, as demonstrated in cassava (Manihot esculenta), where 63% of 327 identified R genes occurred in 39 clusters distributed across chromosomes [18]. These clusters are predominantly homogeneous, containing NBS-LRRs derived from recent common ancestors, which facilitates rapid evolution through recombination and birth-death dynamics. Similar clustering patterns have been observed across Rosaceae species, Asparagus species, and other plant lineages, suggesting conserved genomic organizational principles despite extensive sequence divergence [11] [19].

Table 1: NBS-LRR Gene Distribution Across Selected Plant Species

Species	Genome Type	Total NBS Genes	CNL	TNL	RNL	Reference
Arabidopsis thaliana	Diploid	210	40	48	18	[17]
Dendrobium officinale	Diploid	74	10	0	9	[17]
Akebia trifoliata	Diploid	73	50	19	4	[20]
Vernicia fordii	Diploid	90	49*	0	-	[8]
Vernicia montana	Diploid	149	98*	12	-	[8]
Asparagus officinalis	Diploid	27	-	-	-	[19]
Gossypium hirsutum	Allotetraploid	2188	-	-	-	[6]

Note: Values for Vernicia species represent NBS with CC domains rather than full CNL; CNL=CC-NBS-LRR, TNL=TIR-NBS-LRR, RNL=RPW8-NBS-LRR

Evolutionary Dynamics in Diploid and Polyploid Species

Comparative analyses between diploid and polyploid species reveal complex evolutionary patterns in NBS gene family expansion. Research on Oryza, Glycine, and Gossypium genera demonstrated that NBS gene family sizes vary by several-fold, both among species and surprisingly within species [21]. This variation correlates with natural selection, artificial selection, and genome size variation, but interestingly, not primarily with polyploidization itself. The numbers of NBS genes in polyploid species often resemble those of one of their diploid donors, suggesting limited roles for polyploidization in driving NBS family expansion and indicating that organisms tend not to maintain surplus genes over evolutionary timescales [21].

The evolutionary patterns of NBS genes exhibit remarkable lineage-specific dynamics. In Rosaceae species, independent gene duplication and loss events have resulted in distinct evolutionary patterns: "first expansion and then contraction" in Rubus occidentalis, Potentilla micrantha, Fragaria iinumae and Gillenia trifoliata; "continuous expansion" in Rosa chinensis; and "expansion followed by contraction, then further expansion" in F. vesca [11]. Similarly, analysis of asparagus species (Asparagus officinalis, A. kiusianus, and A. setaceus) revealed significant contraction of NLR genes from wild species (63 in A. setaceus, 47 in A. kiusianus) to domesticated A. officinalis (27 genes), suggesting that artificial selection during domestication may reduce resistance gene diversity [19].

Phylogenetic Distribution and Gene Family Evolution

Phylogenetic Conservation and Divergence

The NBS gene family displays deep evolutionary conservation with recurring patterns of lineage-specific diversification. Reconciled phylogeny of Rosaceae species identified 102 ancestral NBS-LRR genes (7 RNLs, 26 TNLs, and 69 CNLs) that underwent independent duplication and loss events during species divergence [11]. Similarly, comparative analysis across orchid species (Dendrobium officinale, D. nobile, D. chrysotoxum) and related taxa revealed 655 NBS genes with notable absence of TNL-type genes in monocot lineages, indicating parallel degeneration patterns [17].

The phylogenetic distribution of NBS gene subfamilies reveals profound evolutionary constraints and innovations. Angiosperm genomes typically contain three NBS-LRR subfamilies: TNL (TIR-NBS-LRR), CNL (CC-NBS-LRR), and RNL (RPW8-NBS-LRR) [6] [11]. However, monocot species, including orchids and grasses, generally lack TNL genes, potentially due to NRG1/SAG101 pathway deficiency [17]. This phylogenetic distribution suggests subfunctionalization and distinct evolutionary trajectories between monocot and eudicot lineages.

Table 2: Evolutionary Patterns of NBS-LRR Genes Across Plant Families

Plant Family	Representative Species	Evolutionary Pattern	Key Influencing Factors
Rosaceae	Rubus occidentalis, Potentilla micrantha	First expansion then contraction	Independent gene duplication/loss events
Rosaceae	Rosa chinensis	Continuous expansion	High duplication rate, positive selection
Rosaceae	Fragaria vesca	Expansion-contraction-further expansion	Fluctuating selection pressures
Fabaceae	Medicago truncatula, soybean	Consistent expansion	High tandem duplication rates
Poaceae	Rice, maize, Brachypodium	Contracting pattern	Predominant gene loss
Orchidaceae	Dendrobium species	Degeneration and diversity	NB-ARC domain degeneration, type changing
Asparagaceae	Asparagus officinalis	Domesticated contraction	Artificial selection, reduced diversity

Mechanisms of Gene Family Expansion

Gene family expansion occurs through multiple mechanistic pathways, primarily classified as whole-genome duplication (WGD) and small-scale duplications (SSD), including tandem, segmental, and transposon-mediated events [16]. These mechanisms represent distinct modes of expansion, with gene families evolving through WGDs seldom undergoing SSD events, contributing to the maintenance of gene family expansion [6]. In Akebia trifoliata, tandem and dispersed duplications serve as the main forces responsible for NBS expansion, producing 33 and 29 genes respectively [20].

Following duplication, genes may be retained through several evolutionary models:

• Dosage balance model: Retention of duplicates maintaining stoichiometric balance in molecular interactions
• Subfunctionalization: Partitioning of ancestral functions between duplicates
• Neofunctionalization: Acquisition of novel beneficial functions by one duplicate
• Escape from adaptive conflict: Resolution of functional constraints through duplication

The probability of duplicate gene retention depends on gene duplicability, influenced by factors including protein structure, interaction networks, expression patterns, and functional constraints [16]. Genes with modular domain architectures and expression patterns are more amenable to subfunctionalization, while those with tight regulatory constraints or essential functions may be duplication-resistant.

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Genome-Wide Identification of NBS Genes

Standardized pipelines have been established for comprehensive identification and classification of NBS genes across plant genomes. The typical workflow integrates multiple complementary approaches:

HMMER-based Domain Screening: Initial identification employs Hidden Markov Model searches using the conserved NB-ARC domain (Pfam: PF00931) as query with default e-value thresholds (1.0) [18] [20]. This is complemented by custom-built, lineage-specific HMM profiles refined from high-confidence domain alignments to enhance sensitivity.

BLAST-based Homology Searches: Parallel BLASTp analyses against reference NBS protein datasets from model organisms (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa) using stringent E-value cutoffs (1e-10) [19] [20]. This approach identifies divergent homologs that may escape domain-based detection.

Domain Architecture Validation: Candidate sequences undergo rigorous domain validation using InterProScan, NCBI's Conserved Domain Database, and Pfam scans to confirm NB-ARC domain presence (E-value ≤ 1e-5) and identify associated domains (TIR, CC, LRR, RPW8) [18] [19]. Coiled-coil domains require specialized prediction tools (e.g., Paircoil2) with position-specific scoring (P-score cut-off 0.03) due to limitations in conventional domain searches [18].

Classification and Subfamily Assignment: Validated NBS genes are classified into subfamilies (TNL, CNL, RNL) based on N-terminal domain composition and full-length architecture, with additional categorization of truncated variants (NL, CN, TN, RN, N) [8] [19].

Diagram 1: Workflow for NBS Gene Identification

Evolutionary and Phylogenetic Analysis

Orthogroup Analysis: OrthoFinder or similar tools cluster NBS sequences into orthogroups using sequence similarity searches (DIAMOND tool) and MCL clustering algorithm, enabling comparative analysis across species [6] [19]. This identifies core orthogroups conserved across taxa and lineage-specific expansions.

Phylogenetic Reconstruction: Multiple sequence alignment of NB-ARC domains or full-length proteins using MAFFT or Clustal Omega, followed by maximum-likelihood tree construction with tools like FastTreeMP or MEGA with 1000 bootstrap replicates [6] [18]. Reference sequences from model species provide phylogenetic framework.

Evolutionary Pattern Assessment: Reconciliation of gene trees with species trees identifies duplication and loss events, while synteny analysis (MCScanX) discerns WGD versus SSD origins [11]. Tests for selection pressures (dN/dS ratios) reveal signatures of positive or purifying selection.

Table 3: Essential Research Resources for NBS Gene Family Analysis

Resource Category	Specific Tools/Reagents	Primary Function	Application Notes
Genomic Databases	Phytozome, NCBI Genome, Plaza, Rosaceae Genome Database	Source of genome assemblies and annotations	Ensure consistent annotation versions for comparative analysis
Domain Databases	Pfam, InterPro, SMART, CDD	Identification and validation of protein domains	Use custom HMM profiles for lineage-specific domains
Sequence Analysis	HMMER v3, BLAST+, MAFFT, Clustal Omega	Sequence search, alignment, and analysis	Adjust e-value thresholds based on genome size and divergence
Phylogenetic Tools	OrthoFinder, MEGA, FastTreeMP, IQ-TREE	Orthogroup inference and tree building	Apply appropriate substitution models for NBS genes
Expression Databases	IPF Database, CottonFGD, NCBI SRA	Transcriptomic data for expression profiling	Normalize across experiments using standardized pipelines
Functional Validation	VIGS vectors, CRISPR-Cas9 systems, transgenic constructs	Functional characterization of candidate genes	Optimize delivery methods for specific plant species

Signaling Pathways and Functional Mechanisms

NBS-LRR proteins function as central components of plant immune systems, recognizing pathogen effectors and initiating defense signaling cascades. The molecular architecture of canonical NBS-LRR proteins includes an N-terminal domain (TIR, CC, or RPW8), a central NB-ARC domain that functions as a molecular switch by binding and hydrolyzing nucleotides, and a C-terminal LRR domain involved in pathogen recognition and protein-protein interactions [17] [18].

Upon pathogen recognition, NBS-LRR proteins undergo conformational changes that activate downstream signaling pathways. TNL proteins typically activate signaling through EDS1-PAD4-ADR1 modules, while CNL proteins often utilize NDR1-helper complexes [11]. RNL proteins (NRG1 and ADR1 lineages) function as signal transducers downstream of both TNL and CNL activation, amplifying immune responses [20]. This coordinated signaling network culminates in the hypersensitive response, programmed cell death, and systemic acquired resistance.

Diagram 2: NBS-Mediated Immune Signaling Pathway

The phylogenetic distribution and expansion patterns of gene families in diploid and polyploid species reveal complex evolutionary dynamics shaped by both natural and artificial selection. The NBS gene family exemplifies these principles, demonstrating remarkable diversity in size, architecture, and evolutionary trajectory across plant lineages. Comparative genomic analyses consistently show that polyploidization alone does not determine gene family size; rather, lineage-specific duplication and loss events, selective pressures, and functional constraints interact to shape gene family evolution.

The integration of genomic, phylogenetic, and experimental approaches provides powerful frameworks for elucidating these evolutionary patterns. Standardized methodologies for gene family identification, classification, and functional characterization enable robust cross-species comparisons, while emerging technologies in genome editing and functional genomics facilitate direct testing of evolutionary hypotheses. Future research integrating population genomics, structural biology, and comparative phylogenomics will further illuminate the complex interplay between genome duplication, gene family expansion, and adaptive evolution across the diversity of plant lineages.

The Role of Whole-Genome and Tandem Duplications in NBS Gene Family Evolution

The nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) gene family represents the largest class of plant disease resistance (R) genes, encoding proteins crucial for recognizing pathogens and initiating immune responses [6] [9]. The evolution of this gene family is characterized by remarkable dynamism, with gene numbers varying dramatically across plant species—from as few as 5 in some orchids to over 2,000 in wheat [6] [11]. This variation stems primarily from two evolutionary processes: whole-genome duplication (WGD) and tandem duplication [6] [9] [22]. Within the context of broader research comparing NBS genes across 34 plant species, this review examines how these duplication mechanisms have shaped the NBS gene family, driving both conservation and diversification in plant immune systems. Understanding these evolutionary patterns provides crucial insights for developing disease-resistant crops through targeted breeding strategies.

Quantitative Landscape of NBS Genes Across Plant Species

Comparative genomic analyses reveal striking disparities in NBS gene abundance across plant lineages. The following table summarizes the NBS gene counts and duplication patterns in various plant species:

Table 1: NBS Gene Distribution and Duplication Patterns in Plant Genomes

Plant Species	Family	NBS Gene Count	Percentage of Genome	Main Duplication Type	Key Evolutionary Pattern
Apple (Malus domestica)	Rosaceae	1,303	2.05%	Tandem & WGD	Extreme expansion [23]
Peach (Prunus persica)	Rosaceae	437	1.52%	Tandem & WGD	Independent expansion [23] [11]
Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri)	Rosaceae	617	1.44%	Tandem & WGD	"Early sharp expansion to abrupt shrinking" [11]
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)	Solanaceae	603	~76.62% from parental genomes	WGD	Allotetraploid formation [9]
Arabidopsis thaliana	Brassicaceae	149-166	~0.5%	Tandem & Segmental	Birth-and-death evolution [24]
Pepper (Capsicum annuum)	Solanaceae	252	Information missing	Tandem	54% in clusters [25]
Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus)	Fabaceae	274	Information missing	Information missing	124 TNL, 150 CNL [26]
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)	Cucurbitaceae	59-71	0.19%-0.27%	Limited duplications	Gene loss dominance [23]
Akebia trifoliata	Lardizabalaceae	73	Information missing	Tandem & Dispersed	50 CNL, 19 TNL, 4 RNL [20]

The data reveal that Rosaceae species, particularly apple, have experienced extreme NBS gene expansion, while Cucurbitaceae species maintain remarkably low numbers. These differences reflect varying evolutionary pressures and duplication histories among plant families [23].

Table 2: NBS Gene Subfamily Distribution in Selected Species

Species	TNL Count	CNL Count	RNL Count	Notable Subfamily Features
Akebia trifoliata	19	50	4	RNL present [20]
Grass Pea	124	150	Information missing	TNL dominance [26]
Pepper	4	248 (total nTNL)	Information missing	Extreme nTNL bias [25]
Brassica napus	461	180	0	TNL dominance, no RNL [20]
Dioscorea rotundata	0	166	1	TNL absence [20]

The distribution of NBS subfamilies (TNL, CNL, RNL) varies significantly across species, reflecting lineage-specific evolutionary paths. Notably, TNL genes are absent in monocots but present in many dicots, indicating potential specialization in pathogen recognition strategies [22] [25].

Experimental Methodologies for NBS Gene Identification and Evolutionary Analysis

Genomic Identification Protocols

Standardized protocols have emerged for genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of NBS genes. The following workflow illustrates the core experimental methodology:

Detailed Methodological Framework

Genome Assembly and Data Collection: Research begins with acquiring complete genome assemblies and annotated protein sequences from databases such as NCBI, Phytozome, Plaza, or specialized databases (BRAD for Brassica, Rosaceae.org for Rosaceae species) [6] [22]. Selection of species representing diverse evolutionary positions (from mosses to higher plants) and ploidy levels (haploid, diploid, tetraploid) enables comprehensive comparative analyses [6].

HMMER-Based Identification: The core identification step employs Hidden Markov Model (HMM) searches using the PF00931 (NB-ARC) profile from the Pfam database with trusted cutoff E-values (typically 1.1e-50) [6] [9]. This initial screen is followed by validation using NCBI's Conserved Domain Database (CDD) and additional domain predictors (Coiled-coil with threshold 0.5, PAIRCOIL2) to confirm domain architecture [9] [20].

Classification and Phylogenetics: Validated NBS genes are classified based on domain architecture into subfamilies (TNL, CNL, RNL, and variants). Multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE or MAFFT precedes phylogenetic reconstruction with maximum likelihood methods (RAxML, FastTree) with bootstrap validation (typically 1000 replicates) [6] [26]. Orthogroup analysis using OrthoFinder with the MCL clustering algorithm identifies evolutionarily conserved groups across species [6].

Evolutionary History Reconstruction: Gene duplication events are detected using MCScanX with self-BLASTP parameters, identifying tandem, segmental, and WGD-derived genes [9]. Selection pressures are quantified by calculating non-synonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates using KaKs_Calculator with models such as Nei-Gojobori [9]. Gene clusters are defined as physical groupings of ≥2 NBS genes within 200kb [25].

Evolutionary Patterns and Duplication Mechanisms

Duplication Mechanisms Driving NBS Gene Expansion

The evolution of NBS genes is governed by three primary duplication mechanisms that create new genetic material for evolutionary innovation:

Whole-Genome Duplication (WGD): WGD events create complete sets of duplicated NBS genes, significantly expanding the gene family. In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), an allotetraploid formed from hybridizing N. sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis, approximately 76.62% of its 603 NBS genes trace back to these parental genomes [9]. Similarly, the Brassica lineage, which experienced a whole-genome triplication event after diverging from Arabidopsis, shows complex patterns of NBS gene retention and loss [22].

Tandem Duplication: Tandem duplications occur when adjacent genes duplicate, creating gene clusters. In pepper, 54% of NBS genes (136 genes) form 47 physical clusters, with chromosome 3 containing the largest cluster of 8 genes [25]. These clusters often consist of phylogenetically related genes, suggesting recent expansions from common ancestors [24]. Tandem arrays facilitate the generation of sequence diversity through unequal crossing over and gene conversion [24].

Segmental and Ectopic Duplication: Segmental duplications copy entire chromosomal blocks, potentially distributing NBS genes to new genomic locations. Ectopic recombination between unlinked loci can create heterogeneous clusters containing genes from different phylogenetic clades, contributing to functional diversification [24].

Lineage-Specific Evolutionary Patterns

Different plant families exhibit distinct evolutionary patterns shaped by their duplication histories:

Rosaceae - Extreme Expansion: Rosaceae species display the most dramatic NBS gene expansions among documented plants. Apple contains 1,303 NBS genes (2.05% of its genome), the highest reported for any diploid plant [23]. Phylogenetic analyses reconstruct 102 ancestral NBS genes in Rosaceae (7 RNLs, 26 TNLs, and 69 CNLs), which underwent independent duplication and loss events in different lineages [11]. Maleae species (apple, pear) exhibit an "early sharp expanding to abrupt shrinking" pattern, while Rosa chinensis shows "continuous expansion" [11].

Cucurbitaceae - Gene Loss Dominance: In stark contrast to Rosaceae, Cucurbitaceae species maintain remarkably small NBS gene repertoires (cucumber: 59-71 genes; watermelon: 45 genes), representing only 0.19%-0.27% of their genomes [23]. This pattern reflects frequent gene losses and deficient duplications, suggesting alternative defense strategies may operate in these species [23] [11].

Solanaceae - Mixed Evolutionary Paths: Solanaceae species exhibit varied patterns. Pepper contains 252 NBS genes with strong nTNL dominance (248 nTNLs vs. 4 TNLs) [25], while tobacco has experienced significant expansion through WGD [9]. These differences reflect the family's diverse evolutionary history.

Research Reagent Solutions for NBS Gene Studies

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Resources for NBS Gene Analysis

Reagent/Resource	Primary Function	Application Examples	Key Features
HMMER Suite	Hidden Markov Model searches	Domain identification (PF00931)	Statistical rigor for domain detection [6] [9]
Pfam Database	Protein family models	NB-ARC domain (PF00931), TIR, LRR domains	Curated multiple sequence alignments [9] [22]
OrthoFinder	Orthogroup inference	Evolutionary relationships across species	Algorithmic accuracy for orthogrouping [6]
MCScanX	Duplication pattern analysis	Tandem, segmental, WGD identification	Collinearity detection [9]
KaKs_Calculator	Selection pressure analysis	Ka/Ks ratio calculation	Evolutionary model flexibility [9]
MEME Suite	Motif discovery	Conserved NBS motif identification	Pattern recognition in sequences [11] [20]
RNA-Seq Data	Expression profiling	Differential expression under stress	Tissue-specific expression patterns [6] [26]
VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing)	Functional validation	Gene silencing in resistant plants	Rapid functional assessment [6]

Functional and Evolutionary Implications of Duplication Patterns

Functional Diversification and Adaptive Evolution

The duplication mechanisms driving NBS gene expansion have profound functional implications for plant immunity:

Specificity Determinants: The LRR domains, which determine recognition specificity, exhibit the highest variability and experience positive selection, particularly in solvent-exposed residues [6] [25]. This diversification enables recognition of rapidly evolving pathogen effectors. In grass pea, 85% of identified NBS genes show expression under stress conditions, with specific genes upregulated under salt stress, suggesting roles beyond pathogen immunity [26].

Conserved Signaling Components: The NBS domain contains conserved motifs (P-loop, RNBS-A, kinase-2, RNBS-B, RNBS-C, and GLPL) essential for nucleotide binding and hydrolysis [25] [20]. These motifs maintain signaling function while recognition domains diversify. The TIR/CC domains mediate downstream signaling, with TIR domains generally activating EDS1-dependent pathways and CC domains often functioning through NRC helpers [6].

Expression Neofunctionalization: Duplicated NBS genes may undergo expression pattern divergence, partitioning ancestral functions or developing new regulatory responses. In Akebia trifoliata, most NBS genes show low expression, but a subset exhibits relatively high expression in rind tissues during later fruit development, suggesting specialized roles in fruit protection [20].

Evolutionary Dynamics and Selection Pressures

NBS genes evolve through a "birth-and-death" process where new genes are created by duplication, and existing genes are lost or pseudogenized [24]. This dynamic process generates considerable interspecies variation in NBS gene number and composition. Several factors influence this evolutionary trajectory:

Pathogen Pressure: Plants facing diverse pathogen communities maintain expanded NBS repertoires for broad-spectrum recognition. The extreme expansion in apple may reflect its long perennial lifecycle and exposure to numerous pathogens [23].

Genetic Trade-offs: Maintaining large NBS repertoires carries fitness costs, potentially explaining patterns of contraction in some lineages. MicroRNA-mediated regulation may help mitigate these costs, enabling plant species to maintain extensive NLR repertoires [6].

Genomic Context: NBS genes are frequently located in dynamic chromosomal regions with high recombination rates, facilitating their rapid evolution. In Akebia trifoliata, 64% of mapped NBS genes reside in clusters, predominantly at chromosome ends [20].

Whole-genome and tandem duplications have played complementary yet distinct roles in shaping the evolution of the NBS gene family across plant species. WGD events provide the raw genetic material for expansion, while tandem duplications and rearrangements drive functional diversification through novel combinations of protein domains. The extraordinary variation in NBS gene number and architecture among plants—from the massively expanded Rosaceae to the minimal Cucurbitaceae repertoires—demonstrates the dynamic nature of plant-pathogen coevolution. These evolutionary patterns reflect adaptive responses to diverse pathogen pressures, genomic constraints, and physiological trade-offs. Understanding these duplication mechanisms and their functional consequences provides crucial insights for developing disease-resistant crops through marker-assisted breeding or biotechnological approaches that harness the natural diversity of plant immune systems.

From Sequence to Function: Methodologies for Identifying, Classifying, and Profiling NBS Genes

Nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes represent one of the largest and most critical gene families in plant innate immunity, encoding proteins that function as major immune receptors for effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [6]. The identification and comparative analysis of these genes across multiple species provide invaluable insights into plant adaptation mechanisms and resistance gene evolution [6]. The bioinformatic pipeline for NBS gene identification typically integrates three core tools: HMMER for domain detection, Pfam for domain annotation, and OrthoFinder for evolutionary classification. This guide provides an objective comparison of these tools' performance in large-scale comparative genomic studies, particularly within the context of a broader thesis analyzing NBS genes across 34 plant species [6].

Core Tool Functions in NBS Analysis Pipeline

• HMMER: Identifies protein domains within sequence data using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs). It is utilized for initial screening of sequences containing the NBS (NB-ARC) domain through hmmscan searches against the Pfam database [6] [27].
• Pfam: Provides the curated, multiple sequence alignments and HMMs for protein families and domains. The Pfam NBS (NB-ARC) domain (PF00931) serves as the reference model for identifying the core NBS domain in candidate resistance genes [27].
• OrthoFinder: Determines orthologous relationships among genes from multiple species. It clusters identified NBS-domain-containing genes into orthogroups (OGs) to infer evolutionary relationships and gene family expansion mechanisms [6].

Performance Metrics and Benchmarking

Benchmarking studies provide critical data on the accuracy and performance of orthology inference methods like those integrated in OrthoFinder. The following table summarizes OrthoFinder's performance on standard benchmark tests compared to other methods:

Table 1: Orthology Inference Accuracy Assessment on Quest for Orthologs Benchmark Tests

Benchmark Test	Assessment Metric	OrthoFinder Performance	Performance vs. Competitors
SwissTree [28]	Precision, Recall, F-score	3-24% higher F-score	More accurate than any other method tested
TreeFam-A [28]	Precision, Recall, F-score	2-30% higher F-score	Most accurate method on this test
Orthobench [29]	Orthogroup Inference Accuracy	Successfully identified 603 NBS orthogroups across 34 species [6]	Extended and revised 44% of reference orthogroups (31 of 70) in benchmark

Independent assessment using the Orthobench benchmark revealed that OrthoFinder provides high accuracy for orthogroup inference. A study leveraging OrthoFinder successfully identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species and classified them into 603 orthogroups, demonstrating its scalability and accuracy in handling large, complex gene families [6]. The same study highlighted OrthoFinder's utility in identifying core orthogroups (e.g., OG0, OG1, OG2) and species-specific orthogroups, facilitating the understanding of NBS gene diversification [6].

Experimental Protocols for NBS Gene Identification and Analysis

Standardized Workflow for Cross-Species NBS Gene Analysis

The following workflow is adapted from a published large-scale analysis of NBS genes across 34 plant species [6]. This protocol ensures comprehensive identification, classification, and evolutionary analysis of NBS-encoding genes.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for NBS Gene Identification

Reagent/Resource	Function in the Pipeline	Implementation Example
Pfam NBS HMM (PF00931)	Reference model for identifying the NB-ARC domain in protein sequences.	Used with HMMER's hmmscan for initial domain detection [27].
Protein Sequence Files	Input data containing the predicted proteomes for the species under study.	Latest genome assemblies from Phytozome, NCBI, or Plaza [6].
Multiple Sequence Alignment Tool	Aligns sequences for phylogenetic analysis within orthogroups.	MAFFT 7.0 with L-INS-i algorithm [29] [6].
Phylogenetic Tree Tool	Infers evolutionary relationships within gene families.	IQ-TREE or FastTreeMP with best-fit model and bootstrap support [29] [6].

Phase 1: Data Collection and Preparation

• Genome Source: Obtain the latest genome assemblies and annotated protein sequences for all target species from public databases such as NCBI, Phytozome, or Plaza [6]. For the 34-species analysis, this included species from mosses to monocots and dicots, covering families like Brassicaceae, Poaceae, and Malvaceae [6].
• Data Formatting: Ensure all protein sequence files are in FASTA format and consistently annotated.

Phase 2: Identification of NBS Domain-Containing Genes

• HMMER Scan: Use the hmmscan utility from the HMMER suite (e.g., PfamScan.pl) to scan all predicted proteins against the Pfam NBS (NB-ARC) domain model (PF00931). A typical command uses a strict E-value cutoff (e.g., 1.1e-50) to minimize false positives [6].
• Initial Filtering: Extract all genes that contain the NBS domain based on the HMMER results. These genes form the initial candidate set for further analysis.

Phase 3: Domain Architecture Classification

• Additional Domain Detection: Use HMMER/Pfam to scan the candidate NBS genes for other associated domains such as TIR (PF01582), LRR (PF00560, PF07723, PF07725, PF12799), RPW8 (PF05659), and CC (using tools like Paircoil2) [27].
• Gene Classification: Classify the NBS genes into architectural classes (e.g., TIR-NBS-LRR, CC-NBS-LRR, NBS-LRR, NBS) based on their domain combinations [6].

Phase 4: Orthologous Group Inference with OrthoFinder

• Input Preparation: Provide the FASTA files of the identified NBS proteins from all studied species as input to OrthoFinder.
• Run OrthoFinder: Execute OrthoFinder (v2.5.1 or higher) with default parameters. The tool will perform an all-vs-all sequence similarity search (using DIAMOND by default), apply the MCL clustering algorithm, and infer orthogroups and gene trees [6].
• Output Analysis: The primary output of interest is the file containing the orthogroups. These groups represent sets of genes descended from a single ancestral gene in the last common ancestor of all species being analyzed.

Phase 5: Evolutionary and Functional Analysis

• Gene Tree Construction: For orthogroups of interest, infer more robust multiple sequence alignments (e.g., with MAFFT) and phylogenetic trees (e.g., with IQ-TREE) to understand within-group evolution [29].
• Expression and Selection Analysis: Integrate additional data like transcriptomic data to profile expression (e.g., FPKM values under stress conditions) and perform tests for positive selection to identify genes under evolutionary pressure [6].

Diagram 1: NBS Gene Analysis Workflow. The pipeline progresses from domain identification (green) through evolutionary clustering to functional validation (blue).

Comparative Analysis of Tool Performance and Integration

Interoperability and Data Flow

The strength of this bioinformatic pipeline lies in the seamless interoperability between HMMER, Pfam, and OrthoFinder. HMMER uses the Pfam NBS HMM to generate a high-confidence set of candidate genes. The output of this stage—a curated list of NBS proteins with their domain architectures—serves as the direct input for OrthoFinder. OrthoFinder then places these genes into an evolutionary context by clustering them into orthogroups, enabling cross-species comparisons [6]. This integrated approach was successfully used to discover core orthogroups (OG0, OG1, OG2) common across many species and unique orthogroups specific to certain lineages, providing insights into the evolution of plant immunity [6].

Addressing Technical Challenges in NBS Analysis

The combination of these tools effectively addresses several challenges specific to NBS gene analysis:

• Gene Duplication and Loss: NBS genes often undergo rapid evolution through duplication and loss. OrthoFinder's phylogenetic methodology is robust to these processes, helping to distinguish recent paralogs from true orthologs, which is critical for accurate comparative analysis [28] [30].
• Large Gene Families: NBS gene families can be very large (e.g., thousands of genes). The default version of OrthoFinder using DIAMOND for sequence search provides the speed and scalability needed to analyze these extensive datasets within a practical timeframe [28].
• Domain Diversity: NBS genes exhibit significant architectural diversity. The initial step using HMMER and Pfam to classify genes into TNL, CNL, and other subclasses provides a necessary structural framework for interpreting the subsequent orthogroup analysis [27].

The integrated use of HMMER, Pfam, and OrthoFinder establishes a robust and accurate bioinformatic pipeline for the identification and comparative analysis of NBS genes across multiple plant species. Benchmarking data confirms that OrthoFinder provides superior orthology inference accuracy, while the standardized protocol using HMMER with Pfam models ensures comprehensive domain detection. This pipeline has been successfully applied in large-scale studies, enabling researchers to identify evolutionarily conserved and lineage-specific NBS genes, understand the impact of gene duplication, and select candidates for functional validation, thereby advancing our understanding of plant immunity mechanisms.

Orthogroup analysis represents a foundational methodology in modern genomics, enabling researchers to trace evolutionary relationships across multiple species by identifying groups of genes descended from a single ancestral gene in a last common ancestor. This approach is particularly powerful for studying gene family evolution, as it delineates homologous genes into orthologs and paralogs, providing a framework for understanding functional diversification and conservation. Within the broader context of a thesis on the comparative analysis of Nucleotide-Binding Site (NBS) genes across 34 plant species, orthogroup definition serves as the critical first step for classifying the vast diversity of disease-resistance genes. The identification of 603 distinct orthogroups, encompassing both deeply conserved core genes and rapidly evolving species-specific clusters, offers an unprecedented opportunity to decipher the evolutionary mechanisms shaping plant immunity. This analysis provides a systematic comparison of orthogroup inference methodologies, delivering the quantitative data and experimental validation necessary for researchers investigating plant-pathogen interactions and their applications in drug development and crop engineering.

Quantitative Analysis of NBS Orthogroups Across Plant Species

Orthogroup Distribution and Classification

The comprehensive analysis of 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species revealed their organization into 603 orthogroups (OGs) with significant variation in conservation patterns and species distribution [6]. These orthogroups were classified into two primary categories based on their phylogenetic distribution and conservation patterns:

• Core Orthogroups: These represent evolutionarily conserved gene clusters present across multiple species with high sequence conservation. Notable examples include OG0, OG1, and OG2, which constitute the fundamental NBS gene repertoire across diverse plant lineages [6].
• Unique Orthogroups: These are species-specific gene clusters that exhibit restricted phylogenetic distribution, such as OG80 and OG82, which represent recent evolutionary innovations potentially contributing to species-specific adaptation to pathogens [6].

Table 1: Classification and Distribution of Select NBS Orthogroups

Orthogroup ID	Classification	Species Distribution	Key Characteristics
OG0	Core	Broad, multi-species	Most common NBS architecture; foundational disease resistance
OG1	Core	Broad, multi-species	Conserved domain structure; present in ancestral lineages
OG2	Core	Broad, multi-species	Upregulated in tolerant plants under biotic stress [6]
OG6	Core	Broad, multi-species	Responsive to multiple stress conditions
OG15	Core	Broad, multi-species	Differential expression across tissues and stresses
OG80	Unique	Species-specific	Specialized function in specific plant lineages
OG82	Unique	Species-specific	Recent evolutionary origin; potential novel resistance

Structural Diversity and Domain Architecture

The 603 orthogroups encompassed remarkable structural diversity, with genes classified into 168 distinct classes based on domain architecture patterns [6]. This diversity includes:

• Classical architectural patterns: NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, and TIR-NBS-LRR domains representing the canonical resistance gene structures.
• Species-specific structural patterns: Unconventional configurations including TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, and Sugar_tr-NBS, illustrating the functional innovation within specific phylogenetic lineages [6].

Table 2: NBS Gene Domain Architecture Diversity Across 34 Plant Species

Architecture Type	Representative Patterns	Prevalence	Functional Implications
Classical	NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR	Widespread across species	Core pathogen recognition and signal transduction
Species-Specific	TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, Sugar_tr-NBS	Limited distribution	Specialized adaptation to lineage-specific pathogens
Chimeric	Fusion with novel domains	Rare	Potential neofunctionalization

Comparative Analysis of Orthogroup Inference Methods

Methodological Approaches and Performance Metrics

The accurate inference of orthogroups from genomic data relies on sophisticated algorithms that cluster homologous genes based on sequence similarity and phylogenetic relationships. Our evaluation focused on three prominent tools with distinct methodological approaches:

• OrthoFinder: A phylogenetic orthology inference method that uses DIAMOND for sequence similarity searches, identifies orthogroups, infers gene trees for all orthogroups, and analyzes these trees to identify orthologs, paralogs, and gene duplication events [31]. Its recent advancements incorporate rooted gene trees, rooted species trees, and comprehensive comparative genomics statistics.
• OrthoBrowser: A visualization and analysis platform that serves as a downstream complement to OrthoFinder, providing interactive access to phylogeny, gene trees, multiple sequence alignments, and novel multiple synteny alignments [32]. It enhances usability by making complex phylogenetic data visually accessible and explorable.
• OrthoVenn3: A web-based tool for comparative analysis of orthologous clusters that integrates the entire analysis pipeline but is limited to 12 samples in its public instance, with a local version available through Docker [32].

Table 3: Performance Comparison of Orthogroup Inference and Analysis Tools

Tool	Methodology	Scalability	Key Strengths	Limitations
OrthoFinder	Phylogenetic orthology inference using sequence similarity and gene tree analysis	Hundreds of genomes	Highest ortholog inference accuracy; complete phylogenetic analysis; single command operation [31]	Requires computational resources for large datasets
OrthoBrowser	Static site generator for visualization of orthogroup data	Hundreds of genomes	Excellent visualization of complex phylogenetic relationships; user-friendly interface; filters for data subsetting [32]	Dependent on pre-computed OrthoFinder results
OrthoVenn3	Integrated analysis and visualization of orthologous clusters	Limited to 12 samples (public instance)	Web-based convenience; all-in-one pipeline	Limited scalability; requires Docker for local installation [32]

Benchmarking and Accuracy Assessment

Independent benchmarking through the Quest for Orthologs initiative has demonstrated that OrthoFinder achieves superior accuracy in ortholog inference compared to alternative methods [31]. Specifically:

• OrthoFinder showed 3-24% higher accuracy on SwissTree benchmarks and 2-30% higher accuracy on TreeFam-A benchmarks compared to other methods [31].
• The software provides comprehensive outputs including orthogroups, orthologs, rooted gene trees, the rooted species tree, gene duplication events, and comparative genomic statistics through a fully automated pipeline [31].
• OrthoFinder's integration with OrthoBrowser addresses the challenge of interpreting complex phylogenetic data by enabling researchers to visually explore orthogroup relationships, sequence alignments, and syntenic conservation across hundreds of genomes [32].

Experimental Protocols for Orthogroup Validation

Orthogroup Inference Workflow

The identification and analysis of the 603 NBS orthogroups followed a rigorous computational pipeline with distinct stages for orthology inference, evolutionary analysis, and functional validation:

Figure 1: Orthogroup Analysis Workflow. The comprehensive pipeline for identifying and validating NBS gene orthogroups across 34 plant species.

Functional Validation through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing

To experimentally validate the functional significance of identified orthogroups, researchers employed Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) targeting specific NBS genes:

Figure 2: Functional Validation Pipeline. Experimental workflow for validating orthogroup function through virus-induced gene silencing and pathogen challenge.

The critical steps in this validation protocol included:

• Target Selection: Identification of GaNBS from OG2 as a candidate gene based on its differential expression in resistant versus susceptible cotton accessions [6].
• VIGS Construct Design: Development of Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-based vectors containing specific fragments of the target NBS gene to trigger RNA interference.
• Plant Transformation: Agroinfiltration of resistant cotton plants with the VIGS constructs to induce targeted gene silencing.
• Phenotypic Assessment: Evaluation of disease progression and viral titers in silenced plants following challenge with Cotton Leaf Curl Disease (CLCuD) pathogens.
• Molecular Confirmation: Quantitative measurement of target gene expression reduction and correlation with disease susceptibility phenotypes.

This experimental approach demonstrated that silencing of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton led to significantly increased virus titers, confirming its putative role in virus resistance and validating the functional significance of this core orthogroup [6].

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for Orthogroup Analysis

Category	Resource/Tool	Specific Application	Function in Analysis
Computational Tools	OrthoFinder v2.5.1	Orthogroup inference from proteomic data	Identifies orthogroups, infers gene trees, determines orthologs/paralogs [31]
	OrthoBrowser	Visualization of orthogroup relationships	Enables interactive exploration of phylogeny, gene trees, and syntenic alignments [32]
	DIAMOND	Sequence similarity searches	Accelerated BLAST-based comparisons for large-scale genomic datasets [31]
	MAFFT 7.0	Multiple sequence alignment	Generates accurate alignments for phylogenetic analysis [6]
Biological Materials	Gossypium hirsutum accessions	Functional validation experiments	Comparative analysis of susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) varieties [6]
	VIGS vectors (TRV-based)	Gene silencing studies	Enables functional characterization through targeted gene knockdown [6]
	Cotton Leaf Curl Virus isolates	Pathogen challenge experiments	Provides biological context for resistance gene function [6]
Database Resources	NCBI/Phytozome/Plaza	Genomic data retrieval	Sources for genome assemblies and annotations across 34 plant species [6]
	IPF Database	Expression data analysis	Tissue-specific and stress-responsive expression profiles for NBS genes [6]

Genetic Variation and Protein Interaction Analyses

Complementing the orthogroup identification, detailed genetic variation analysis between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions revealed substantial differences in NBS gene sequences:

• The tolerant Mac7 accession contained 6,583 unique variants in NBS genes, while the susceptible Coker312 accession presented 5,173 variants [6].
• Protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction studies demonstrated strong binding affinity between specific NBS proteins and ADP/ATP, confirming their functional role as nucleotide-binding proteins [6].
• Critical interactions were identified between putative NBS proteins and core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus, suggesting direct recognition mechanisms in disease resistance [6].

These molecular analyses provide mechanistic insights into how sequence variation within orthogroups translates to functional differences in pathogen recognition and defense activation.

The systematic analysis of 603 conserved and species-specific orthogroups has provided unprecedented insights into the evolutionary dynamics of NBS disease resistance genes across diverse plant species. Through the application of sophisticated orthology inference tools like OrthoFinder, complemented by visualization platforms such as OrthoBrowser, researchers can now accurately delineate gene families and trace their evolutionary trajectories. The experimental validation of core orthogroups, particularly through functional approaches like VIGS, demonstrates the critical importance of these conserved genetic modules in plant immunity. The integration of computational orthogroup analysis with experimental molecular validation creates a powerful framework for identifying key genetic determinants of disease resistance, with significant implications for crop improvement strategies and the development of durable disease control measures in agricultural systems.

Chromosomal Mapping and Visualization of NBS Gene Clusters and Singletons

Nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes represent the largest and most important class of disease resistance (R) genes in plants, encoding proteins capable of recognizing diverse pathogens and initiating robust immune responses [33]. These genes are characterized by conserved NBS domains that facilitate ATP/GTP binding and hydrolysis, coupled with C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains responsible for pathogen recognition [17]. Based on their N-terminal domains, NBS-LRR genes are primarily classified into TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL), CC-NBS-LRR (CNL), and RPW8-NBS-LRR (RNL) subfamilies [6]. The genomic organization of NBS genes is notably non-random, with genes frequently distributed unevenly across chromosomes and often forming dense clusters driven by tandem duplications and genomic rearrangements [34]. This structural complexity presents both challenges and opportunities for researchers seeking to understand the evolution of plant immunity and develop disease-resistant crops.

The significance of chromosomal mapping and visualization of NBS gene clusters and singletons extends beyond basic research to practical applications in crop improvement. As plant pathogens continue to evolve, deciphering the genomic architecture of resistance genes becomes paramount for breeding programs worldwide. This guide provides a comprehensive comparison of methodologies, visualization tools, and experimental approaches for characterizing NBS genes across plant species, with particular emphasis on recent large-scale comparative genomic studies that have revolutionized our understanding of R gene evolution and organization.

Comparative Genomic Distribution of NBS Genes Across Plant Species

Genome-Wide Identification and Chromosomal Distribution Patterns

Recent advances in sequencing technologies have enabled researchers to systematically identify and map NBS genes across numerous plant species. A landmark study analyzing 34 plant species from mosses to monocots and dicots identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes, revealing remarkable diversity in their genomic organization and architectural patterns [6]. These genes were classified into 168 distinct classes, encompassing both classical (NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR) and species-specific structural patterns, highlighting the dynamic evolution of this critical gene family.

The distribution of NBS genes across chromosomes exhibits significant variability both between and within species. In pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), researchers identified 252 NBS-LRR genes distributed unevenly across all chromosomes, with 54% forming 47 distinct gene clusters driven primarily by tandem duplications and genomic rearrangements [34]. Similarly, in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), 178 NBS-LRR-type genes and 145 partial genes were located across 11 chromosomes, with 30 classified as TNL types and 148 as CNL types [33]. These distribution patterns reflect the evolutionary history of R genes and provide insights into species-specific adaptation to pathogen pressures.

Table 1: Comparative Genomic Distribution of NBS Genes Across Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NBS Genes	NBS-LRR Genes	TNL:CNL Ratio	Chromosomal Distribution	Gene Clusters
Capsicum annuum (Pepper)	252	252	4:248	Uneven across all chromosomes	47 clusters (54% of genes)
Phaseolus vulgaris (Common Bean)	323 (178 full + 145 partial)	178	30:148	Across 11 chromosomes	Information not specified
Salvia miltiorrhiza	196	62 complete NBS-LRR	Marked reduction in TNL/RNL	Information not specified	Information not specified
Dendrobium officinale	74	22 NBS-LRR	No TNL genes identified	Across 19 pseudochromosomes	Information not specified
Solanum tuberosum (Potato)	587 NBS domains	576 NBS-LRR loci	Information not specified	576 mapped to 12 chromosomes	Highly clustered organization

Evolutionary Patterns and Lineage-Specific Adaptations

Comparative analyses across plant lineages have revealed fascinating evolutionary patterns in NBS gene distribution. Monocots, including orchids and grasses, demonstrate significant reduction or complete loss of TNL-type genes, with studies of six orchid species revealing no TNL genes in any of the examined species [17]. This TNL deficiency in monocots appears to be driven by NRG1/SAG101 pathway deficiency and represents a major lineage-specific evolutionary adaptation [17]. In contrast, dicot species generally maintain both TNL and CNL subtypes, though their relative proportions vary considerably.

The expansion and contraction of NBS gene families follow distinct evolutionary trajectories across plant lineages. In the genus Dendrobium, NBS gene degeneration emerges as a common phenomenon, primarily manifested through type changing and NB-ARC domain degeneration [17]. This degeneration contributes significantly to the diversity of NBS genes and their functional specialization. Similarly, studies in pepper identified the dominance of the nTNL subfamily over the TNL subfamily, reflecting lineage-specific adaptations and evolutionary pressures [34]. These evolutionary patterns highlight the dynamic nature of R gene repertoires and their continuous adaptation to changing pathogen landscapes.

Methodological Framework for NBS Gene Identification and Mapping

Genome-Wide Identification Protocols

The identification of NBS genes across plant genomes relies on conserved protein domains and sophisticated bioinformatics tools. A standard approach involves using HMMER searches with Pfam domain models (particularly the NB-ARC domain, PF00931) against plant genome sequences [6] [33]. Additional domain analysis tools such as SMART and COILS are employed to identify associated domains (CC, TIR, LRR), enabling comprehensive classification of NBS-encoding genes [34] [17]. This multi-domain verification approach ensures accurate annotation of NBS gene candidates.

Following initial identification, gene structure analysis provides valuable insights into evolutionary relationships. Researchers typically analyze exon-intron structures by comparing genomic DNA sequences with their corresponding cDNA or predicted coding sequences [33]. Motif analysis using tools like MEME facilitates the identification of conserved sequence motifs beyond the core NBS domain, with subsequent annotation through InterProScan providing functional insights [34]. These structural analyses reveal patterns of gene evolution and potential functional diversification within NBS gene families.

Chromosomal Mapping and Cluster Analysis Methods

Chromosomal mapping of NBS genes utilizes genome annotation files to determine physical positions along chromosomes. Researchers extract chromosomal location information from general feature format (GFF) files and visualize distribution patterns using statistical software or custom scripts [33]. Gene clusters are typically defined as genomic regions containing multiple NBS genes within a specified distance threshold—often two or more NBS genes located within 200 kb [34]. This operational definition enables consistent identification of clustered regions across studies and species.

The identification of tandem duplications, a key driver of NBS gene cluster formation, relies on specific criteria including: (1) the presence of multiple NBS genes in a single cluster, (2) shared sequence similarity (>80% identity), and (3) physical proximity on chromosomes [34]. Advanced algorithms such as MCScanX are frequently employed to identify both tandem and segmental duplication events, providing insights into the evolutionary mechanisms shaping NBS gene repertoires. These analyses reveal that tandem duplications represent a primary mechanism for NBS gene expansion, particularly in response to rapidly evolving pathogen populations.

NBS Gene Analysis Workflow: The diagram illustrates the comprehensive pipeline for identifying, mapping, and evolutionarily analyzing NBS genes, from initial domain identification through chromosomal mapping to evolutionary interpretation.

Visualization Tools for Comparative Genomics and Chromosomal Mapping

Advanced Visualization Platforms for Genomic Data

Effective visualization is crucial for interpreting the complex genomic organization of NBS genes. Multiple specialized tools have been developed to facilitate comparative genomics and chromosomal mapping. Circos stands as a powerful software package for visualizing data in circular layouts, enabling researchers to display relationships between genomic features, including NBS gene positions, syntenic regions, and chromosomal rearrangements [35]. Similarly, the UCSC Genome Browser provides conservation tracks within a widely-used genome browser framework, allowing for intuitive visualization of NBS gene distribution across chromosomes [35].

For synteny analysis and comparative genomics, tools such as SynMap and Cinteny offer specialized functionality. SynMap generates syntenic dot-plots between two organisms and identifies syntenic regions, facilitating the detection of conserved NBS gene clusters across species [35]. Cinteny enables the detection of syntenic regions across multiple genomes while measuring the extent of genome rearrangement using reversal distance as a measure [35]. These tools collectively provide researchers with diverse approaches to visualize and interpret the genomic architecture of NBS genes.

Table 2: Genomic Visualization Tools for NBS Gene Analysis

Tool	Primary Function	URL	Platform	Strengths for NBS Analysis
Circos	Circular layout visualization of genomic data	Not specified	Standalone	Ideal for showing genome-wide distribution of NBS clusters and relationships
UCSC Genome Browser	Genome visualization with conservation tracks	https://genome.ucsc.edu/	Web-based	Excellent for chromosomal mapping with comparative context
SynMap	Syntenic dot-plot generation between genomes	Not specified	Web-based	Identifies syntenic NBS regions across species
Cinteny	Synteny detection across multiple genomes	Not specified	Web-based	Measures genome rearrangement in NBS regions
GBrowse_syn	Synteny browser for multiple genomes	Not specified	Standalone	Displays multiple genomes with central reference species
VISTA	Comparative analysis of genomic sequences	Not specified	Web-based	Comprehensive suite for sequence conservation analysis

Network-Based Stratification and Integration Approaches

Recent methodological advances have introduced network-based approaches for integrating and visualizing complex genomic data. Network-based Stratification (NBS) represents an innovative framework that maps somatic mutation profiles onto cancer networks and propagates these mutations to create smoothed network profiles [36] [37]. While initially developed for cancer research, this approach shows significant promise for plant NBS gene analysis by enabling the integration of genetic and gene expression data within networks of their probabilistic relationships.

The CANclust (covariate-adjusted network clustering) method exemplifies next-generation visualization and analysis approaches [36]. This methodology integrates mutational and clinical data within networks of their probabilistic relationships, enabling the discovery of patient subgroups—an approach that could be adapted for identifying NBS gene expression patterns in plant populations. These network-based techniques facilitate the identification of meaningful biological subgroups beyond what is possible through traditional linear genomic visualization alone, potentially offering new insights into NBS gene function and regulation.

Experimental Validation and Functional Characterization

Expression Profiling and Association Studies

Functional characterization of NBS genes extends beyond genomic localization to include comprehensive expression analysis. Researchers typically employ RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR to build expression profiles of NBS genes in response to pathogen challenges and across different tissues [33]. For example, in Dendrobium officinale, transcriptome analysis under salicylic acid (SA) treatment identified 1,677 differentially expressed genes, including six NBS-LRR genes that were significantly up-regulated, providing insights into SA-mediated defense mechanisms [17]. These expression patterns help prioritize candidate genes for further functional studies.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) represent another powerful approach for validating the functional significance of NBS genes. In common bean, researchers developed NBS-SSR markers and detected nine disease resistance loci for anthracnose and seven for common bacterial blight [33]. Notably, markers NSSR24, NSSR73, and NSSR265 were located in new regions for anthracnose resistance, while NSSR65 and NSSR260 marked novel regions for common bacterial blight resistance [33]. These findings demonstrate how chromosomal mapping combined with association studies can identify functionally relevant NBS genes for crop improvement.

Functional Validation through Genetic Approaches

Direct functional validation of NBS genes typically involves genetic manipulation and phenotypic analysis. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful technique for rapid functional characterization. In cotton, silencing of GaNBS (OG2) through VIGS demonstrated its putative role in virus tolerance, providing direct evidence of its function in disease resistance [6]. Similarly, protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction studies have revealed strong interactions between putative NBS proteins and ADP/ATP, as well as different core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus [6].

Genetic variation analysis between susceptible and tolerant accessions provides additional validation of NBS gene function. Comparative analysis of susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions identified numerous unique variants in NBS genes, with Mac7 displaying 6,583 variants compared to 5,173 in Coker312 [6]. These genetic variants, when correlated with phenotypic differences, strengthen the evidence for specific NBS genes contributing to disease resistance and facilitate marker-assisted selection in breeding programs.

NBS-LRR Gene Signaling Pathway: The diagram illustrates the central role of NBS-LRR proteins in plant immunity, showing how they recognize pathogen effectors to activate effector-triged immunity (ETI) and downstream defense responses.

Successful chromosomal mapping and functional characterization of NBS genes requires specialized research reagents and bioinformatics resources. Wet laboratory investigations depend on high-quality genomic DNA extraction kits, such as the KingFisher Apex system with MagMax DNA Multi-Sample Ultra 2.0 kit, which enables efficient DNA isolation from various plant tissues, including dried blood spots in medical contexts [38]. For sequencing applications, library preparation kits like xGen cfDNA and FFPE DNA Library Prep MC kit provide robust platforms for preparing sequencing libraries, while quantification kits such as Quant-iT dsDNA HS Assay and Kapa Library Quantification Kit ensure accurate DNA measurement prior to sequencing [38].

Computational analysis of NBS genes relies on specialized bioinformatics tools and databases. OrthoFinder represents an essential package for orthogroup analysis, employing DIAMOND for fast sequence similarity searches and the MCL clustering algorithm for gene clustering [6]. For variant calling and annotation, the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) pipeline provides industry-standard processing, while ANNOVAR and Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor enable comprehensive functional annotation of identified variants [38]. These computational resources form the foundation of modern NBS gene analysis, allowing researchers to process increasingly large and complex genomic datasets.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Resources for NBS Gene Analysis

Category	Resource/Reagent	Specific Application	Function in NBS Research
Wet Lab Reagents	KingFisher Apex with MagMax DNA kit	DNA extraction	High-quality DNA isolation from plant tissues
	xGen cfDNA Library Prep Kit	Sequencing library preparation	Construction of sequencing libraries from extracted DNA
	Kapa Library Quantification Kit	Library quantification	Accurate measurement of DNA libraries before sequencing
	NBS-specific primers (P-loop, Kinase-2, GLPL)	NBS domain amplification	Targeted amplification of NBS domains from genomic DNA
Bioinformatics Tools	OrthoFinder	Orthogroup analysis	Identifying orthologous NBS genes across species
	GATK HaplotypeCaller	Variant calling	Identifying polymorphisms in NBS genes
	ANNOVAR & VEP	Variant annotation	Functional interpretation of NBS gene variants
	HMMER with Pfam models	Domain identification	Detecting NB-ARC domains in protein sequences
Databases	Pfam database	Domain information	Curated models of NB-ARC and related domains
	ClinVar database	Pathogenic variants	Classification of variant pathogenicity
	gnomAD	Population frequency	Assessing variant frequency in populations

The chromosomal mapping and visualization of NBS gene clusters and singletons has evolved from simple gene counting to sophisticated integrative analyses that combine genomic, transcriptomic, and functional data. The field has progressed significantly from early studies that primarily catalogued NBS gene numbers to contemporary research that explores three-dimensional genomic architecture, epigenetic regulation, and network-based integration of multi-omics data. This methodological evolution has transformed our understanding of how plants maintain and adapt their defense arsenals in the face of rapidly evolving pathogens.

Future directions in NBS gene research will likely focus on several emerging areas, including single-cell sequencing to understand cell-type-specific expression of R genes, pan-genome analyses to capture the full diversity of NBS genes across entire species complexes, and machine learning approaches to predict functional specificity from sequence features. As visualization tools become more sophisticated and integration methodologies more refined, our ability to decipher the complex genomic architecture of plant immunity will continue to improve, accelerating the development of durable disease resistance in crop plants. The continued comparison of methodologies and systematic evaluation of analytical approaches, as presented in this guide, will ensure that researchers can select the most appropriate techniques for their specific biological questions and plant systems of interest.

Nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes represent the largest class of plant disease resistance (R) genes, encoding proteins that play a crucial role in the innate immune system by recognizing diverse pathogens and initiating defense responses [6]. These genes are characterized by a conserved NBS domain that facilitates nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, often accompanied by C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains for pathogen recognition and variable N-terminal domains that define major subfamilies [39]. The NBS-LRR gene family is divided into several subclasses based on N-terminal domains, including TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL), CC-NBS-LRR (CNL), and RPW8-NBS-LRR (RNL) [40].

Transcriptomic profiling has emerged as a powerful approach for investigating the expression patterns of NBS genes across different tissues and stress conditions, providing insights into their functional specialization and regulatory mechanisms [6]. This comparative guide synthesizes experimental data from recent transcriptomic studies to objectively analyze NBS gene expression patterns, methodological approaches, and functional validation strategies across diverse plant species, framed within the context of a broader thesis on comparative analysis of NBS genes across 34 plant species [6].

NBS Gene Family Diversity and Classification

The NBS gene family exhibits remarkable diversity across plant species, with significant variation in gene numbers, structural architectures, and evolutionary patterns. A comprehensive analysis across 34 plant species identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes, classifying them into 168 distinct classes with both classical and species-specific domain architecture patterns [6]. The table below summarizes the diversity of NBS genes across selected plant species:

Table 1: Diversity of NBS Encoding Genes Across Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NBS Genes	CNL-Type	TNL-Type	RNL-Type	Other/Partial	Key Features
Arabidopsis thaliana	207	~40	~101	~1	65	Model plant with well-characterized resistance
Oryza sativa (Rice)	~600	505	0	0	~95	Monocot with complete TNL absence
Nicotiana tabacum (Tobacco)	603	274	15	2	312	Allotetraploid with parental genome contributions
Ipomoea batatas (Sweet potato)	889	Predominant	0	Limited	-	Hexaploid with extensive gene duplication
Salvia miltiorrhiza	196	61	0	1	134	Medicinal plant with TNL/RNL degeneration
Vernicia montana (Tung tree)	149	98	12	-	39	Disease-resistant cultivar with specific LRR domains
Manihot esculenta (Cassava)	228	Predominant	Limited	-	-	Key food crop with validated disease resistance
Dendrobium officinale	74	10	0	0	64	Orchid with significant NBS gene degeneration

Comparative genomic analyses reveal that NBS gene families have undergone species-specific evolutionary trajectories including expansion through duplication events and contraction through gene loss [41]. Monocot species generally lack TNL-type genes, while eudicots maintain both CNL and TNL types, though with significant variation in relative proportions [5]. For instance, Salvia species exhibit marked reduction in TNL and RNL subfamilies, while gymnosperms like Pinus taeda show TNL subfamily expansion comprising 89.3% of typical NBS-LRRs [40].

Experimental Methodologies for Transcriptomic Analysis

Genome-Wide Identification of NBS Genes

Standardized protocols for NBS gene identification employ Hidden Markov Model (HMM) searches using domain profiles (e.g., PF00931 for NBS domain) from databases like Pfam, followed by validation through conserved domain databases (CDD) and motif analysis [42]. The sequential workflow ensures comprehensive gene identification and accurate classification:

Transcriptomic Profiling Approaches

RNA-sequencing technologies form the cornerstone of NBS gene expression analysis. Experimental workflows typically involve:

• Treatment Design: Application of biotic stresses (pathogens, insects), abiotic stresses (drought, heat, salinity), and hormone treatments (salicylic acid, jasmonic acid) across multiple time points [39] [5].
• Tissue Sampling: Collection from various organs (roots, stems, leaves, flowers) under controlled and stressed conditions [6].
• Library Preparation & Sequencing: Standard RNA-seq library preparation followed by high-throughput sequencing on platforms such as Illumina [42].
• Bioinformatic Analysis:
  • Quality control of raw reads using Trimmomatic or similar tools [42]
  • Read alignment to reference genomes with HISAT2 or STAR [42]
  • Transcript quantification and normalization (FPKM/TPM) [6]
  • Differential expression analysis with Cuffdiff/DESeq2 [42] [43]

Table 2: Key Experimental Parameters in Transcriptomic Studies of NBS Genes

Experimental Component	Standard Specifications	Variations Across Studies
RNA-Seq Platform	Illumina HiSeq/MiSeq	Platform selection affects read length and depth
Sequencing Depth	20-40 million reads per sample	Varies by genome complexity and project scope
Replication	3-6 biological replicates	Critical for statistical power in differential expression
Reference Genomes	Species-specific when available	Closely related species used for non-model plants
Expression Metrics	FPKM/TPM normalized counts	Enables cross-sample comparison
Differential Expression Threshold	Fold-change ≥2, FDR <0.05	Stringency affects candidate gene lists
Validation Methods	qRT-PCR, VIGS, transgenic approaches	Confirms RNA-seq findings and functional roles

Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns of NBS Genes

Transcriptomic analyses across diverse plant species have revealed that NBS genes display distinct tissue-specific expression patterns, suggesting specialized functional roles in different organs. In cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), comprehensive expression profiling demonstrated that specific orthogroups (OGs) showed preferential expression in roots, leaves, stems, or reproductive tissues, indicating organ-specific defense specializations [6].

Similar tissue-specific expression patterns were observed in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), where RNA-seq analysis identified NBS genes with preferential expression in storage roots, leaves, or stems, reflecting potential roles in protecting these economically valuable tissues [41]. The expression of four MeLRR genes in cassava showed variation across tissues, with each gene displaying unique expression profiles that likely correspond to their specialized functions in different organs [39].

These tissue-specific expression patterns suggest that NBS genes have evolved specialized functions to protect vulnerable tissues or those with high metabolic investment, possibly through tailored recognition capabilities against pathogens that preferentially target specific organs.

Expression Responses to Biotic Stress

NBS genes demonstrate dynamic regulation in response to pathogen challenge, with distinct expression patterns between resistant and susceptible genotypes. The following diagram illustrates the conceptual framework of NBS gene-mediated defense activation:

Viral Pathogen Responses

In cotton resistant to cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), specific NBS orthogroups (OG2, OG6, OG15) showed significant upregulation following viral infection [6]. Functional validation through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton demonstrated its critical role in reducing viral titer, confirming its importance in antiviral defense [6]. Protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction analyses revealed strong binding of specific NBS proteins with ADP/ATP and core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus, indicating direct molecular recognition mechanisms [6].

Fungal Pathogen Responses

In tung trees, the orthologous gene pair Vf11G0978-Vm019719 exhibited contrasting expression patterns between resistant (Vernicia montana) and susceptible (V. fordii) species following Fusarium wilt infection [8]. While Vm019719 showed upregulated expression in the resistant species, its allelic counterpart in the susceptible species was downregulated, correlating with differential disease outcomes [8]. Similarly, in cassava, four MeLRR genes were significantly induced by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis infection, with functional analysis through VIGS and transient overexpression confirming their positive regulation of disease resistance [39].

Expression Dynamics inNicotianaSpecies

Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis in Nicotiana tabacum identified numerous NBS genes responsive to black shank disease (Phytophthora nicotianae) and bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum), with distinct expression kinetics between resistant and susceptible cultivars [42]. These expression patterns highlight the functional diversification of NBS genes in recognizing taxonomically diverse pathogens and activating appropriate defense responses.

Expression Responses to Abiotic Stress and Hormonal Signaling

Abiotic Stress Regulation

NBS genes demonstrate significant expression modulation under various abiotic stress conditions, revealing crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress response pathways. In Brassica oleracea, 17 NBS-encoding genes showed responsive expression to combined heat stress and Fusarium oxysporum infection, with eight genes highly induced in resistant cultivars [43]. Three specific genes were aligned with chromosome 3 of Arabidopsis, which contains a known major disease resistance complex, suggesting conserved regulatory mechanisms linking thermal and pathogen stress responses [43].

Transcriptomic analysis of Salvia miltiorrhiza identified NBS genes responsive to drought, salt, and temperature stresses, with promoter analysis revealing an abundance of cis-acting elements related to abiotic stress response [40]. Similarly, expression profiling in cotton demonstrated that specific NBS orthogroups responded to dehydration, cold, drought, heat, dark, osmotic, salt, and wounding stresses, indicating their potential roles in integrating environmental signals with defense responses [6].

Hormonal Regulation

Salicylic acid (SA) treatment has been shown to significantly induce NBS gene expression across multiple species. In Dendrobium officinale, transcriptome analysis following SA treatment identified 1,677 differentially expressed genes, including six NBS-LRR genes that were significantly upregulated [5]. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) revealed that Dof020138 was closely associated with pathogen recognition pathways, MAPK signaling, plant hormone signal transduction, and energy metabolism pathways, suggesting a central role in immune signaling networks [5].

In cassava, the four MeLRR genes showed significant induction by exogenous SA treatment, and functional analysis demonstrated that these genes positively regulated endogenous SA accumulation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, along with increased expression of pathogenesis-related gene 1 (PR1) [39]. This SA-mediated induction pattern appears to be a conserved regulatory mechanism across plant species, positioning NBS genes as key components in the SA-dependent defense signaling pathway.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Experimental Solutions for NBS Gene Studies

Reagent/Solution	Application Purpose	Specific Examples	Functional Role
HMMER Software	Domain identification	HMMER v3.1b2 with PF00931	Identifies NBS domains in protein sequences
Sequence Alignment Tools	Phylogenetic analysis	MUSCLE, MAFFT	Multiple sequence alignment for evolutionary studies
Phylogenetic Software	Evolutionary relationships	MEGA11, FastTreeMP	Constructs phylogenetic trees with statistical support
Differential Expression Tools	RNA-seq analysis	Cuffdiff, DESeq2	Identifies significantly differentially expressed genes
VIGS Vectors	Functional validation	TRV-based vectors (pTRV1/pTRV2)	Silences candidate NBS genes to test function
qRT-PCR Reagents	Expression validation	SYBR Green assays	Confirms RNA-seq expression patterns
SA Treatment Solutions	Defense induction	100-500 μM salicylic acid	Activates SA-dependent defense signaling pathways
Agrobacterium Strains	Plant transformation	GV3101, EHA105	Delivers constructs for transient or stable expression
VMD-928	VMD-928, CAS:1802770-18-8, MF:C31H32N4O4, MW:524.6 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
Cyclo(his-pro) TFA	Cyclo(his-pro) TFA, MF:C13H15F3N4O4, MW:348.28 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

Transcriptomic profiling of NBS genes across tissues and stress conditions has revealed complex regulatory patterns and functional specializations within this important gene family. The integration of genome-wide identification, expression analysis, and functional validation provides a comprehensive framework for understanding NBS gene regulation and function. Key findings include the tissue-specific expression of NBS genes, their differential regulation in resistant versus susceptible genotypes, their responsiveness to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses, and their integration into hormonal signaling networks, particularly the SA pathway.

These insights not only advance our fundamental understanding of plant immunity but also provide valuable resources for molecular breeding programs aimed at enhancing disease resistance in crop plants. The experimental methodologies and reagents outlined in this guide offer researchers a standardized approach for conducting comparative analyses of NBS genes across species and conditions, facilitating future discoveries in plant immunity and stress response mechanisms.

Leveraging Public Genomic and RNA-seq Databases for Comparative Studies

In the evolving field of plant genomics, researchers are increasingly leveraging public data repositories to conduct comparative studies across multiple species. These databases provide unprecedented access to genomic and transcriptomic data, enabling large-scale analyses that would be otherwise impractical for individual research groups. Within this context, the study of nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes—a major class of plant disease resistance genes—exemplifies how public data can drive discoveries in plant immunity mechanisms. Recent research has identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species, ranging from mosses to monocots and dicots, demonstrating the power of comparative genomics approaches [6]. These studies rely heavily on curated public databases for genome assemblies, annotation data, and expression profiles, forming the foundation for understanding plant adaptation and defense mechanisms.

For researchers investigating NBS genes and other plant gene families, public databases provide the essential infrastructure for comparative genomics and functional genomics analyses. These resources have become particularly valuable for tracing evolutionary patterns, identifying orthologous gene groups, and understanding diversification mechanisms across plant lineages. The integration of data from multiple databases allows scientists to develop comprehensive insights into gene family evolution and function, significantly accelerating the pace of discovery in plant genomics [44].

Comparative Analysis of Major Public Genomics Databases

Plant genomics researchers have access to diverse database types, each serving specific research needs. General repositories such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) provide raw and processed data from diverse experiments, while specialized plant databases offer curated resources tailored to botanical research. Organism-specific databases focus on particular plant species or families, and analysis frameworks provide tools for comparative genomics. Each database type offers distinct advantages for different phases of NBS gene research and comparative genomic studies.

Table 1: Major Public Databases for Plant Genomic and Transcriptomic Research

Database Name	Type	Key Features	Data Content	Use Cases in NBS Gene Research
GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus)	General repository	NIH-supported, interfaces with SRA for raw data, advanced search functionality	Microarray, bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq data from multiple organisms	Accessing expression profiles of NBS genes under various stress conditions [45] [46]
SRA (Sequence Read Archive)	Raw data repository	Stores raw sequencing data (FASTQ files), linked to GEO records	FASTQ files from diverse sequencing platforms	Downloading raw reads for re-analysis of NBS gene expression [45] [47]
EMBL Expression Atlas	Curated database	Categorized as "baseline" or "differential" expression studies	Processed RNA-seq data with standardized analysis	Exploring tissue-specific expression patterns of NBS genes [45]
PLAZA	Specialized plant database	Integrated comparative genomics platform, gene family circumscriptions	134 high-quality plant genomes with orthogroup assignments	Classifying NBS genes into orthologous groups across species [48]
PlantTribes2	Analysis framework	Galaxy-based tools, scalable for user-provided data	Gene family scaffolds, annotation resources	Phylogenetic analysis of NBS gene families [48]
GTEx (Plant)	Tissue expression database	Tissue-specific expression data, browse by tissue type	Bulk and single-nucleus RNA-seq data	Examining NBS expression across different plant tissues [45]

Database Selection Criteria for NBS Gene Studies

When designing comparative studies of NBS genes across multiple species, researchers should consider several critical database characteristics. Data quality remains paramount, as variations in genome assembly completeness and annotation accuracy can significantly impact gene family analyses. For example, a study of NBS-encoding genes in four Ipomoea species revealed substantial variation in gene counts (from 554 in I. trifida to 889 in sweet potato), underscoring the importance of high-quality genome assemblies for accurate gene identification [49].

The scope of species coverage represents another crucial consideration. Databases with broad phylogenetic representation, such as PLAZA 5.0 with its 134 carefully selected plant genomes, enable comprehensive evolutionary analyses across diverse plant lineages [48]. This broad coverage proved essential for research identifying 168 distinct classes of NBS domain architecture patterns across 34 plant species [6].

Analysis tools and interoperability further distinguish database utility. Frameworks like PlantTribes2 offer scalable solutions for gene family analysis, providing multiple sequence alignment, gene family phylogeny, and inference of large-scale duplication events [48]. Such tools are particularly valuable for NBS gene studies, as these genes often evolve through tandem duplication and whole-genome duplication events [50].

Experimental Protocols for Cross-Database NBS Gene Analysis

Genome-Wide Identification and Classification of NBS Genes

The initial step in comparative NBS gene analysis involves comprehensive identification and classification across species. The standard protocol utilizes Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiling based on conserved protein domains, particularly the PF00931 (NB-ARC) domain from the Pfam database [6] [50]. Researchers typically employ HMMER software with trusted cutoff thresholds to identify candidate NBS-encoding genes, followed by manual curation to ensure data quality.

Following identification, genes are classified based on their domain architecture into major categories including TNL (TIR-NBS-LRR), CNL (CC-NBS-LRR), RNL (RPW8-NBS-LRR), and various truncated forms [49]. This classification reveals evolutionary patterns, such as the absence of TNL-type genes in monocots and their abundance in dicots, providing insights into lineage-specific adaptations [50]. Advanced classification systems group similar domain architecture patterns into classes, enabling researchers to discover both classical and species-specific structural patterns [6].

Evolutionary Analysis Using Orthogroup Clustering

Orthogroup clustering represents a powerful method for understanding the evolutionary relationships among NBS genes across multiple species. This approach utilizes tools such as OrthoFinder with the DIAMOND tool for fast sequence similarity searches and the MCL clustering algorithm for grouping genes into orthologous groups [6]. A recent large-scale study of NBS genes identified 603 orthogroups, including both core orthogroups (shared across multiple species) and unique orthogroups (specific to particular lineages) [6].

The evolutionary analysis often reveals patterns of gene duplication and loss that have shaped NBS gene repertoires across plant species. For example, studies in Brassica species demonstrated that after whole-genome triplication, NBS-encoding homologous gene pairs were frequently deleted or lost, followed by species-specific gene amplification through tandem duplication [50]. These dynamic evolutionary processes contribute to the substantial variation in NBS gene numbers observed across plant genomes, ranging from fewer than 100 to more than 1,000 copies [51].

Expression Analysis Integrating RNA-seq Data

Expression profiling of NBS genes utilizing public RNA-seq data provides critical insights into their functional roles across tissues, developmental stages, and stress conditions. Researchers typically extract FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads) values from databases such as the EMBL Expression Atlas, plant-specific expression databases, or NCBI's GEO [6] [45]. These expression values are then categorized into tissue-specific, abiotic stress-specific, and biotic stress-specific profiles to understand regulatory patterns.

Advanced expression analyses often employ weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify correlations between NBS genes and specific traits or stress responses [44]. For example, a comparative genomics study of cotton identified correlations between the GhSCL-8 gene and salt tolerance through WGCNA [44]. Similarly, expression analyses of NBS genes in tolerant and susceptible cotton accessions revealed thousands of unique variants associated with disease resistance [6].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for NBS Gene Analysis

Category	Tool/Reagent	Specific Examples	Application in NBS Research
Genome Databases	Plant-centric databases	PLAZA, Phytozome, BRAD, Bolbase	Accessing curated genome assemblies and annotations [6] [50]
Expression Databases	RNA-seq repositories	GEO, EMBL Expression Atlas, GTEx	Retrieving transcriptomic profiles across conditions [45] [46]
Analysis Tools	Orthology inference	OrthoFinder, PlantTribes2	Identifying orthologous NBS gene groups [6] [48]
Analysis Tools	Sequence alignment	MAFFT, ClustalW	Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic analysis [6] [50]
Analysis Tools	Phylogenetics	FastTreeMP, Maximum likelihood	Reconstructing evolutionary relationships [6]
Experimental Validation	Functional tools	VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing)	Validating NBS gene function in resistant plants [6]
Experimental Validation	Interaction studies	Protein-ligand docking, Y2H	Testing NBS protein interactions with pathogens [6]
Nrf2 activator-3	Nrf2 activator-3, MF:C23H18F3N3O2, MW:425.4 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
[Lys5,MeLeu9,Nle10]-NKA(4-10)	[Lys5,MeLeu9,Nle10]-NKA(4-10), MF:C39H65N9O9, MW:804.0 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

Signaling Pathways and Regulatory Networks in NBS Gene Function

NBS-LRR proteins function as critical components in plant immune signaling pathways, particularly in effector-triggered immunity (ETI). These proteins typically consist of three fundamental components: an N-terminal domain (TIR, CC, or RPW8), a central NB-ARC domain, and a C-terminal LRR domain [6] [51]. The central NB-ARC domain functions as a molecular switch, alternating between ADP- and ATP-bound states to control downstream signaling [51].

Plants implement sophisticated regulatory networks to control NBS gene expression, as constitutive high expression often carries fitness costs [51]. Diverse miRNA families target NBS-LRR genes in eudicots and gymnosperms, typically focusing on highly duplicated NBS-LRRs [51]. This regulatory relationship exhibits co-evolutionary dynamics, with duplicated NBS-LRRs periodically giving rise to new miRNAs that target conserved protein motifs [51].

Case Study: Integrated Database Analysis of NBS Genes Across 34 Plant Species

A recent landmark study exemplifies the power of integrating multiple public databases for comprehensive NBS gene analysis [6]. This research utilized genome assemblies from 34 plant species covering diverse lineages from mosses to monocots and dicots, sourced from publicly available databases including NCBI, Phytozome, and Plaza [6]. The methodology combined HMM-based domain identification with orthogroup clustering, yielding insights into both evolutionary patterns and functional specialization.

The study revealed that NBS genes exhibit remarkable diversification in domain architecture, with 168 distinct classes identified [6]. Expression profiling integrated from multiple RNA-seq databases demonstrated upregulation of specific orthogroups (OG2, OG6, OG15) in various tissues under biotic and abiotic stresses [6]. Functional validation through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton demonstrated its role in virus tittering, connecting evolutionary analysis with mechanistic insights [6].

This case study highlights how strategic integration of diverse database resources enables comprehensive understanding of complex gene families. By leveraging publicly available data across multiple species, researchers can extract evolutionary principles that would be impossible to discern from single-species studies, accelerating the discovery of genetic elements crucial for crop improvement and sustainable agriculture.

Public genomic and RNA-seq databases have transformed comparative studies of plant gene families, particularly for complex and diverse groups like NBS disease resistance genes. The integration of data from multiple repositories enables researchers to trace evolutionary patterns across deep phylogenetic distances, identify conserved functional elements, and accelerate the discovery of genetic factors underlying agronomic traits. As these databases continue to expand and improve in quality, and as analysis frameworks become increasingly accessible, the plant research community is positioned to make unprecedented progress in understanding the genetic basis of plant immunity and adaptation. Strategic leveraging of these public resources will continue to drive innovations in crop improvement and sustainable agriculture.

Overcoming Complexity: Strategies for Navigating NBS Gene Annotation and Functional Analysis

Addressing Challenges in Annotating Highly Variable and Complex NBS Gene Families

The nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) gene family constitutes the largest and most critical class of plant disease resistance (R) genes, enabling plants to recognize diverse pathogens and activate robust immune responses [40] [52]. These genes encode intracellular proteins that function as key receptors in effector-triggered immunity (ETI), providing specific resistance against viruses, bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes [10]. Approximately 80% of functionally characterized R genes belong to the NBS-LRR family, highlighting their paramount importance in plant defense systems [10].

Annotation challenges arise from their exceptional genetic variation, complex genomic architecture, and dynamic evolutionary patterns. These genes exhibit remarkable structural diversity, varying significantly in number, domain architecture, and organization across plant species [6] [25]. This variability presents substantial difficulties for accurate genome annotation, functional characterization, and comparative genomic studies. This guide systematically compares the performance of current annotation methodologies while providing standardized protocols for researchers investigating these complex genetic elements across diverse plant species.

Comparative Genomic Landscape of NBS-LRR Genes

Quantitative Variation Across Plant Lineages

The NBS-LRR gene family demonstrates extraordinary variation in gene numbers across the plant kingdom, reflecting species-specific evolutionary paths and adaptation pressures. Recent studies have identified striking disparities, from merely dozens in some species to thousands in others.

Table 1: NBS-LRR Gene Distribution Across Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NBS Genes	CNL Subfamily	TNL Subfamily	RNL Subfamily	Reference
Triticum aestivum (Wheat)	2,151	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	[9]
Oryza sativa (Rice)	505	Not specified	0	0	[40] [10]
Vitis vinifera (Grape)	352	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	[9]
Nicotiana tabacum (Tobacco)	603	224 (CC-NBS + CC-NBS-LRR)	12 (TIR-NBS + TIR-NBS-LRR)	Not specified	[9]
Capsicum annuum (Pepper)	252	48 (with CC domains)	4	Not specified	[25]
Arabidopsis thaliana	207	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	[40]
Solanum tuberosum (Potato)	447	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	[40]
Salvia miltiorrhiza	196	61 (complete CNL)	0	1	[40] [10]
Lathyrus sativus (Grass pea)	274	150	124	Not specified	[26]
Asparagus officinalis (Garden asparagus)	27	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	[19]
Vernicia montana (Tung tree)	149	98 (with CC domains)	12 (with TIR domains)	Not specified	[52]

Monocot species like rice, wheat, and maize typically lack TNL genes entirely, while eudicots exhibit substantial variation in TNL retention [40] [10] [52]. For example, while Arabidopsis thaliana maintains significant TNL representation, Salvia miltiorrhiza and Vernicia fordii demonstrate remarkable TNL depletion [10] [52]. These distribution patterns reflect complex evolutionary histories including lineage-specific gene loss, duplication events, and selective pressures from pathogen communities.

Structural Diversity and Classification Systems

NBS-LRR genes are categorized based on their domain architecture, which directly influences their function in plant immunity signaling. The classification system has evolved to encompass both typical and atypical configurations.

Table 2: NBS-LRR Gene Classification Based on Domain Architecture

Classification Category	Domain Structure	Description	Functional Role
Typical NBS-LRR	Full N-terminal, NBS, and LRR domains	Complete receptor structure	Direct pathogen recognition and immune signaling
TNL	TIR-NBS-LRR	TIR domain for signal transduction	Activates defense signaling pathways
CNL	CC-NBS-LRR	Coiled-coil domain for protein interaction	Mediates pathogen recognition and immunity
RNL	RPW8-NBS-LRR	RPW8 domain from resistance to powdery mildew	Serves as signaling component in immune system
Atypical NBS-LRR	Incomplete domain structures	Variants missing one or more domains	Diverse functions, some as truncated receptors
N	NBS only	Nucleotide-binding site alone	Regulatory functions or degenerate genes
TN	TIR-NBS	TIR and NBS domains without LRR	Possible signaling or decoy functions
CN	CC-NBS	CC and NBS domains without LRR	Potential adaptor proteins in signaling
NL	NBS-LRR	NBS and LRR without specific N-terminal	Possible pathogen recognition

The structural diversity extends beyond domain presence/absence to include variations such as multiple NBS domains (NN, NLN, NLNLN) observed in pepper genomes [25]. These complex architectures likely represent evolutionary innovations for recognizing diverse pathogen effectors or regulating immune signaling networks.

Methodological Framework for NBS-LRR Annotation

Standardized Annotation Pipeline

Accurate annotation of NBS-LRR genes requires a multi-step computational approach that combines sequence similarity searches, domain identification, and structural validation. The following workflow represents the community standard derived from recent pan-genomic studies:

NBS-LRR Annotation Workflow

The annotation process begins with genomic resources including genome assemblies and annotated protein sequences [9] [19]. The primary identification employs HMMER software with the PF00931 (NB-ARC) Hidden Markov Model from the Pfam database, using stringent e-value cutoffs (1e-5 to 1e-50) to ensure specificity [9] [6] [26]. Candidate sequences then undergo domain validation using InterProScan and NCBI's Conserved Domain Database (CDD) to identify associated domains (TIR, CC, LRR) [19] [26]. Classification categorizes genes into subfamilies based on domain architecture, followed by manual curation to resolve complex cases and validate gene models [52]. Finally, functional annotation integrates expression evidence, evolutionary relationships, and comparative genomic data.

Experimental Validation Approaches

Functional characterization of annotated NBS-LRR genes requires orthogonal experimental approaches to verify their roles in disease resistance:

Table 3: Experimental Methods for NBS-LRR Gene Validation

Method	Protocol Summary	Key Applications	Technical Considerations
Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS)	Delivery of gene-specific sequences via viral vectors to trigger RNA silencing	Functional validation through loss-of-function phenotypes; e.g., GaNBS silencing increased cotton susceptibility to leaf curl disease [6]	Requires optimized vectors and controls; may have off-target effects
Expression Profiling	RNA-seq analysis of pathogen-infected vs. control tissues; qPCR validation	Identify differentially expressed NBS-LRR genes; Vm019719 upregulation in Vernicia montana during Fusarium infection [52]	Multiple timepoints needed; correlation not proof of function
Transgenic Complementation	Expressing candidate genes in susceptible genotypes	Confirm gene function; heterologous expression of maize NBS-LRR in Arabidopsis improved resistance [9]	Requires stable transformation; position effects may influence results
Promoter Analysis	Identification of cis-regulatory elements in upstream regions	Link expression patterns to regulatory motifs; defense-related elements (SA, JA, ET responsiveness) [40] [10]	Bioinformatics predictions require experimental validation
Protein Interaction Studies	Yeast-two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation	Identify signaling partners; NBS-LRR interaction with viral proteins [6]	May miss transient or conditional interactions

Recent studies have successfully integrated these approaches. For example, in tung trees, VIGS of Vm019719 in resistant Vernicia montana compromised Fusarium wilt resistance, while promoter analysis revealed a functional W-box element essential for WRKY transcription factor binding and gene activation [52].

Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools

Advanced annotation of NBS-LRR genes requires specialized bioinformatic tools and experimental reagents carefully selected for their precision and reliability.

Table 4: Essential Research Toolkit for NBS-LRR Gene Analysis

Tool/Reagent Category	Specific Tools	Function	Application Notes
Genome Annotation Resources	NCBI, Phytozome, Plaza	Source of genome assemblies and annotations	Quality varies; use BUSCO assessments to evaluate completeness
Domain Identification	HMMER, InterProScan, NCBI CDD	Identify conserved domains (NBS, TIR, CC, LRR)	Combined approach increases sensitivity and specificity
Phylogenetic Analysis	MUSCLE, MEGA11, RAxML	Evolutionary relationships and orthology inference	Different algorithms may yield varying tree topologies
Expression Analysis	Hisat2, Cufflinks, Trimmomatic	RNA-seq data processing and differential expression	Multiple normalization methods improve accuracy
Functional Validation	VIGS vectors, qPCR reagents	Experimental confirmation of gene function	Species-specific optimization required
Orthology Analysis	OrthoFinder, MCScanX	Identify conserved gene families across species	Helps distinguish lineage-specific expansions
Motif Discovery	MEME Suite	Identify conserved protein motifs	Reveals functional regions beyond primary domains

The consistency of tool application across studies enables meaningful comparative analyses. For example, the standard use of HMMER with PF00931 allows direct comparison of NBS-LRR gene counts across species [9] [19] [26].

Evolutionary Dynamics and Genomic Organization

Mechanisms of Gene Family Expansion and Contraction

The NBS-LRR gene family exhibits dynamic evolutionary patterns driven by several genetic mechanisms that contribute to its remarkable variability:

NBS-LRR Gene Family Evolution

Tandem duplications represent the primary mechanism for NBS-LRR gene expansion, creating genomic clusters of closely related genes [25]. For example, in pepper genomes, 54% of NBS-LRR genes (136 genes) form 47 physical clusters, with the largest cluster containing eight genes on chromosome 3 [25]. Similarly, comparative analysis of asparagus species revealed that NLR genes display chromosomal clustering patterns, with wild species (Asparagus setaceus) containing more genes (63) than domesticated garden asparagus (A. officinalis, 27 genes), indicating substantial gene loss during domestication [19].

Whole-genome duplication (WGD) events also contribute significantly to NBS-LRR expansion, particularly in polyploid species. Research in tobacco demonstrated that whole-genome duplication contributed significantly to the expansion of NBS gene families, with 76.62% of NBS members in allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum traceable to its parental genomes [9]. The evolutionary trajectory of these genes is shaped by balancing selection maintaining diversity at specific residues involved in pathogen recognition, while purifying selection conserves structural domains essential for signaling functions [6].

The annotation of highly variable and complex NBS gene families remains challenging due to their dynamic nature, diverse domain architectures, and species-specific evolutionary patterns. Successful annotation requires integrated approaches combining advanced bioinformatics tools with experimental validation, as outlined in this guide. Standardized methodologies enable meaningful cross-species comparisons, revealing both conserved features and lineage-specific adaptations in plant immune gene families.

Future efforts should leverage complete telomere-to-telomere genome assemblies [53] to resolve complex regions harboring NBS-LRR genes and employ pangenome approaches to capture full species diversity. The integration of expression data, epigenetic marks, and protein interaction networks will provide deeper functional insights beyond simple annotation. These advances will ultimately enhance our ability to harness NBS-LRR genes for developing disease-resistant crops through marker-assisted breeding and biotechnological approaches.

Resolving Inconsistencies in N-Terminal Domain Classification (CC, TIR, RPW8)

Plant nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins serve as intracellular immune receptors that detect pathogen effectors and initiate effector-triggered immunity (ETI), often culminating in a hypersensitive response (HR) characterized by programmed cell death [54] [55]. The standard classification system for NLR proteins is based on their variable N-terminal domains, which have been categorized into three major types: Coiled-Coil (CC), Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor (TIR), and Resistance to Powdery Mildew 8 (RPW8) [6] [19]. This tripartite classification scheme forms the foundation of NLR nomenclature across plant species.

Despite this seemingly straightforward system, significant inconsistencies in N-terminal domain classification persist due to several biological and technical challenges. The extreme diversity of NLR genes, with hundreds of members per genome and dramatic variation between species, complicates consistent annotation [56] [6]. Additionally, truncated variants lacking specific domains but retaining functionality, and the presence of non-canonical architectures with unusual domain combinations further obscure clear classification [6] [19]. This guide systematically addresses these inconsistencies through comparative analysis and provides standardized experimental frameworks for accurate domain characterization.

Establishing the Standard Classification Framework

The canonical N-terminal domain-based classification system divides plant NLR proteins into three structurally and functionally distinct subfamilies, each with characteristic domain architectures and signaling mechanisms.

Table 1: Standard NLR Subfamilies Based on N-Terminal Domains

Subfamily	N-Terminal Domain	Key Conserved Motifs/Features	Signaling Pathway Dependencies	Phylogenetic Distribution
CNL	Coiled-Coil (CC)	MADA motif (MADAxVSFxVxKLxxLLxxEx) in many helper NLRs [57]	Requires NDR1 in Arabidopsis [1]	All angiosperms [1]
TNL	TIR	TIR-specific motifs spanning ~175 amino acids [1]	Requires EDS1 in Arabidopsis [1]	Absent from most monocots, especially cereals [1]
RNL	RPW8	RPW8-like domain [6]	Often function as helper NLRs [6]	Typically single-digit counts per genome [19]

Beyond the domain architecture itself, several molecular features help distinguish these subfamilies. The central NBS domain contains subclass-specific motifs (RNBS-A, RNBS-C, and RNBS-D) that differ between TNLs and CNLs [1]. Additionally, genomic organization varies, with NLR genes frequently clustered in genomes due to both segmental and tandem duplications, with type I genes evolving rapidly and type II genes evolving slowly [1]. From a functional perspective, signaling pathways differ substantially, as TNLs and CNLs utilize distinct downstream signaling components despite recognizing similar types of pathogens [1].

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making workflow for proper NLR classification based on integrated criteria:

Technical Limitations in Domain Identification

The initial identification of N-terminal domains presents the first major challenge in NLR classification. Sequence divergence in N-terminal domains creates difficulties for standard homology-based searches, particularly for CC domains that may lack obvious coiled-coil propensity [1]. Additionally, truncated variants lacking complete domains (e.g., TIR-NBS or CC-NBS proteins without LRR domains) comprise a substantial portion of NLR repertoires and challenge conventional classification systems [6] [1].

Table 2: Solutions for Technical Challenges in Domain Identification

Challenge	Impact on Classification	Recommended Solution	Validation Method
Sequence Divergence	CC domains with low coiled-coil probability misclassified	Use hybrid approach: HMMER + structure prediction (e.g., DeepCoil) [56] [19]	Compare with known MADA-containing NLRs [57]
Truncated Variants	Incomplete proteins assigned to wrong subfamily	Implement hierarchical classification: first NB-ARC, then N-terminal domains [6]	Functional assays for executor/helper activity [57]
Non-Canonical Architectures	Proteins with unusual domains misclassified as novel	Use inclusive domain databases (InterProScan) with manual curation [56] [19]	Orthogroup analysis across species [6]

Functional Specialization and Evolutionary Dynamics

Beyond technical identification issues, functional specialization within NLR networks creates natural classification challenges. The helper NLRs, such as those in the NRC family, often contain conserved MADA motifs that define their cell death-inducing capability, while sensor NLRs that detect pathogen effectors frequently lack functional MADA motifs despite having similar domain architectures [57]. This functional differentiation occurred over evolutionary time through gene duplication and specialization, with sensor NLRs losing executor capabilities while retaining detection functions [57].

Comparative genomic analyses reveal that lineage-specific expansions have dramatically shaped NLR repertoires, with different subfamilies amplified in various plant lineages [1]. For example, TNLs are completely absent from cereal genomes, while specific CNL clades have expanded in Solanaceous plants [1]. This phylogenetic distribution creates inconsistencies when applying universal classification criteria across distant plant families.

Experimental Protocols for Domain Validation

Comprehensive Bioinformatics Workflow

A robust bioinformatics pipeline is essential for accurate NLR identification and classification. The following integrated protocol combines multiple complementary approaches:

• Step 1: Domain Identification - Perform HMMER searches against the target proteome using the conserved NB-ARC domain (PF00931) as query with an E-value cutoff of 1×10⁻⁵ [56]. Conduct parallel BLASTp analyses using reference NLR sequences from well-annotated species (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana) with stringent E-value cutoff of 1×10⁻¹⁰ [19].

• Step 2: Domain Architecture Validation - Validate all candidate sequences through InterProScan and NCBI's Batch CD-Search to confirm domain composition and boundaries [56] [19]. Retain only sequences containing definitive NB-ARC domains (E-value ≤ 1×10⁻⁵).

• Step 3: Motif Identification - Use MEME suite to identify conserved motifs within N-terminal domains, with particular attention to the MADA motif (MADAxVSFxVxKLxxLLxxEx) in CNLs and TIR-specific motifs in TNLs [57] [19].

• Step 4: Orthogroup Analysis - Cluster NLRs into orthogroups across multiple species using OrthoFinder v2.5+ to distinguish conserved from lineage-specific NLR classes [6]. This evolutionary context helps resolve ambiguous classifications.

Functional Characterization of N-Terminal Domains

Experimental validation of N-terminal domain function provides the definitive evidence for proper classification. The following protocol tests the cell death induction capability of N-terminal domains:

• Step 1: Construct Design - Clone full-length NLR genes and their isolated N-terminal domains (CC, TIR, or RPW8) into Gateway-compatible expression vectors with C-terminal YFP/HA tags for localization studies [54] [58].

• Step 2: Transient Expression - Express constructs in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves via Agrobacterium infiltration (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5-0.8) using 4-5 week-old plants grown at 24°C under 16h/8h light/dark cycles [54] [58].

• Step 3: Cell Death Assay - Monitor infiltrated leaves for hypersensitive response (HR) cell death over 2-5 days post-infiltration. Isolated CC domains of executor NLRs (e.g., AT1G12290, NRC4) typically induce cell death within 48-72 hours [54] [57].

• Step 4: Subcellular Localization - Image YFP fluorescence using confocal microscopy to determine subcellular localization. Many CC-NLRs localize to plasma membranes, often dependent on N-terminal myristoylation sites (e.g., Gly2 in AT1G12290) [58].

• Step 5: Structure-Function Analysis - Generate serial truncations of positive N-terminal domains to identify minimal cell death-inducing regions (e.g., 1-100 aa for AT1G12290) [58]. Test domain functionality through motif-swapping experiments between helper and sensor NLRs [57].

The following diagram illustrates this integrated experimental pipeline:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for NLR Domain Characterization

Reagent/Tool	Specific Example	Function in NLR Research	Experimental Application
HMMER Suite	PF00931 (NB-ARC domain)	Identifies conserved NBS domains in proteomes [56]	Initial NLR repertoire identification [56]
Gateway Cloning System	pENTR/D-TOPO, destination vectors	Modular cloning of NLR genes and domains [58]	Expressing NLR constructs in plants [58]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	GV3101 strain	Delivers NLR constructs into plant cells [54] [58]	Transient expression in N. benthamiana [54]
Confocal Microscopy	YFP/GFP-tagged proteins	Visualizes subcellular localization of NLRs [58]	Determining PM vs. nuclear localization [58]
OrthoFinder Software	v2.5.1+	Clusters NLRs into orthogroups across species [6]	Evolutionary classification of NLR subfamilies [6]
Mu Transposition System	In vitro transposition	Generates random truncation libraries [57]	Identifying minimal functional regions [57]
Serotonin-d4	Serotonin-d4, CAS:58264-95-2, MF:C10H12N2O, MW:180.24 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

Resolving inconsistencies in N-terminal domain classification requires integrating evolutionary insights with functional validation. The standardized framework presented here emphasizes the importance of the executor signature MADA motif in CC-NLRs, proper handling of truncated variants, and lineage-specific evolutionary patterns. As NLR classification moves beyond purely sequence-based approaches to incorporate structural and functional data, researchers will be better equipped to navigate the complex landscape of plant immune receptors. The experimental protocols and reagents detailed in this guide provide a roadmap for achieving consistent, biologically meaningful classification of NLR N-terminal domains across diverse plant species.

Optimizing Parameters for Accurate Detection of Tandem and Segmental Duplications

The accurate detection of genetic duplications—ranging from small, tandem internal repeats to large segmental duplications spanning thousands of bases—represents a critical challenge in genomic analysis. Within the context of our broader comparative analysis of nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes across 34 plant species, precise duplication detection is paramount for understanding the evolutionary mechanisms driving disease resistance gene expansion, diversification, and functional specialization [6] [59]. The detection of these structural variants requires sophisticated computational approaches with carefully optimized parameters to balance sensitivity, specificity, and computational efficiency.

This guide provides an objective comparison of leading algorithms and methodologies for detecting both tandem and segmental duplications, with particular emphasis on their application in plant NBS gene research. We present experimental data from multiple studies to illustrate performance characteristics and provide detailed protocols for implementing these approaches in practice. As the NBS gene family exhibits remarkable diversification through duplication events across plant species [6] [11], optimized detection parameters are essential for accurate evolutionary inference and functional characterization.

Algorithm Comparison and Performance Metrics

Detection Tools for Different Duplication Types

Table 1: Comparison of Duplication Detection Algorithms

Algorithm	Duplication Type	Optimal Size Range	Key Parameters	Reported Sensitivity	Primary Applications
ITD Assembler [60]	Internal Tandem Duplication (ITD)	15-300 bp	pkmer (partial tandem duplication parameter), dkmer (De Bruijn graph kmer size), covcutoffmin/max (coverage cutoffs)	Highest percentage of reported FLT3-ITDs in TCGA AML dataset [60]	Gene-level tandem duplications, cancer genomics, NBS gene duplications
SEDEF [61]	Segmental Duplications (SDs)	>1 kbp	Jaccard similarity threshold, local chaining parameters, pairwise error allowance up to 25%	10 CPU hours for human genome vs. weeks for WGAC [61]	Whole-genome SD analysis, evolutionary studies, genome assembly evaluation
Custom FLT3-ITD Informatics [62]	Gene-specific ITDs	3-300 bp	Local re-alignment criteria (soft clips ≥6 bp, net insertions ≥3 bp), clustering threshold (score=5)	100% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity for FLT3-ITD status [62]	Clinical detection of specific gene duplications, allelic ratio calculation
WGAC [61] [63]	Segmental Duplications	>1 kbp	BLAST parameters, chunk size (400 Kb), sequence identity (>90%)	Traditional approach, largely superseded by SEDEF [61]	Historical baseline, within-assembly duplication detection

Performance Metrics in Experimental Applications

In practical applications, these algorithms demonstrate varying performance characteristics. The ITD Assembler algorithm, when applied to 314 AML patient samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, identified the highest percentage of reported FLT3-ITDs compared to other detection algorithms and discovered additional ITDs in multiple genes [60]. Similarly, a custom FLT3-ITD informatics pipeline achieved 100% sensitivity (42/42) and 99.4% specificity (1076/1083) relative to capillary electrophoresis when using anchored multiplex PCR on an unselected cohort [62].

For segmental duplications, SEDEF provides substantial advantages in computational efficiency, characterizing SDs in the human genome in approximately 10 CPU hours compared to the several weeks required by the traditional WGAC approach even when run on a compute cluster [61]. This dramatic speed improvement enables more rapid analysis of multiple genomes while maintaining accuracy.

Experimental Protocols for Duplication Detection

ITD Assembler Methodology for Tandem Duplications

The ITD Assembler employs a sophisticated two-step assembly approach to overcome limitations of alignment-based algorithms in detecting tandem duplications [60]. The protocol begins with extraction of all unmapped and soft-clipped reads from BAM files using SAMtools and BamTools, with soft-clipped regions ≥4 base pairs. The algorithm then applies multiple filtering steps:

• Remove reads with excessive 'N' content (C~S~('N') > 50)
• Filter reads with homopolymer runs of 15 or more bases
• Identify reads containing duplication sequence signatures of defined length (p_kmer)
• Bin remaining reads by annotated duplication distance

The second stage involves De Bruijn graph construction for reads in each bin using kmer size dkmer, which cannot be less than the partial tandem duplication parameter pkmer. The algorithm uses matrix exponentiation to evaluate the adjacency matrix and identify cycles of the representative bin length supported by kmer coverage above user-defined cutoffs (covcutoffmin, covcutoffmax). Finally, reads containing kmers that participate in cycles are assembled using Phrap via overlap-layout-consensus, and contigs are compared to the reference genome using BLAST to annotate their origin and calculate allele fractions [60].

SEDEF Protocol for Segmental Duplications

SEDEF rapidly detects segmental duplications through sophisticated filtering strategies based on Jaccard similarity and local chaining [61]. The methodology involves:

• Initial Screening: Identification of potential duplication regions using Jaccard similarity of kmer sets between genomic regions
• Local Chaining: Application of local chaining algorithms to extend and refine duplication boundaries
• Filtering: Implementation of biological filters to distinguish true segmental duplications from other repetitive elements
• Validation: Comparison with whole-genome shotgun sequence detection (WSSD) methods to identify potentially collapsed duplications in the assembly

A key advancement in SEDEF is its ability to capture duplications with up to 25% pairwise error between segments, whereas previous studies typically focused on only 10% divergence, enabling deeper tracking of evolutionary history [61].

Custom NBS Gene Duplication Analysis Pipeline

For the specific analysis of NBS gene families across multiple plant species, researchers have developed specialized pipelines [6] [64] [11]. The general workflow includes:

• Identification: BLAST and HMMER searches using the hidden Markov model of the NB-ARC domain (PF00931) as a query with expectation values typically set at 1.0 for BLAST and default parameters for HMM search
• Classification: Division of NBS-LRR genes into TNL, CNL, and RNL subclasses based on N-terminal domains using Pfam and NCBI-CDD searches with E-value thresholds of 10^(-4)
• Cluster Analysis: Identification of genomic clusters with homogeneous NBS-LRR gene content using physical position information
• Evolutionary Analysis: Assessment of duplication mechanisms (tandem vs. dispersed duplications) through phylogenetic reconstruction and synteny analysis

This approach has been successfully applied to characterize NBS gene families in numerous plant species, from Akebia trifoliata (73 NBS genes) to various Rosaceae species (2188 NBS-LRR genes across 12 genomes) [64] [11].

Visualization of Duplication Detection Workflows

ITD Assembler Algorithm Flowchart

Segmental Duplication Detection Workflow

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Duplication Analysis

Resource Category	Specific Tools/Databases	Primary Function	Application Context
Algorithm Implementations	ITD Assembler [60], SEDEF [61], Custom FLT3-ITD informatics [62]	Core detection algorithms for different duplication types	Specific duplication detection based on research question
Sequence Data Resources	NCBI SRA, Phytozome, Genome Database for Rosaceae [11]	Source of genomic and transcriptomic data	Multi-species comparative analyses
Domain Databases	Pfam (PF00931 for NB-ARC) [64] [18], NCBI-CDD	Identification of conserved protein domains	NBS gene identification and classification
Alignment Tools	BWA-MEM [62], Bowtie2, Novoalign	Sequence alignment to reference genomes	Preprocessing for duplication detection
Visualization Platforms	UCSC Genome Browser [63], GSDS2.0 [11]	Genomic context visualization	Interpretation of duplication events
Validation Methods	Capillary Electrophoresis [62], RNA-seq validation [60]	Experimental verification of predictions	Confirmation of computational predictions

Discussion and Comparative Analysis

Performance Trade-offs in Duplication Detection

The comparative analysis of duplication detection algorithms reveals significant trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, and computational efficiency. ITD Assembler excels at detecting smaller tandem duplications that often escape detection by conventional alignment methods, particularly in the challenging 15-80 bp range where insert-containing reads frequently fail to align properly to reference genomes [60]. Meanwhile, SEDEF provides dramatic improvements in processing time for genome-wide segmental duplication analysis compared to traditional WGAC methods, reducing analysis time from weeks to hours while maintaining comprehensive detection capability [61].

In plant NBS gene research, these tools enable different aspects of evolutionary analysis. The discovery that NBS genes in Rosaceae species exhibit distinct evolutionary patterns—from "first expansion and then contraction" in Rubus occidentalis to "continuous expansion" in Rosa chinensis [11]—relies on accurate detection of both tandem and segmental duplication events. Similarly, the identification of 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species with several novel domain architecture patterns [6] demonstrates the power of comprehensive duplication analysis for understanding gene family evolution.

Parameter Optimization Guidelines

Based on experimental results from multiple studies, several key parameter optimization guidelines emerge:

For ITD detection, the partial tandem duplication parameter (pkmer) should be set based on the minimum duplication length of biological interest, with values typically between 10-15 bp providing good sensitivity without excessive false positives [60]. The De Bruijn graph kmer size (dkmer) must be at least as large as p_kmer, with larger values providing more specificity but potentially missing some divergent duplications.

For segmental duplication detection, SEDEF's ability to capture duplications with up to 25% pairwise error represents a significant advantage over methods limited to 10% divergence, as it enables tracking of evolutionarily older duplication events [61]. The Jaccard similarity thresholds and local chaining parameters should be adjusted based on the specific genome characteristics, with more stringent values required for repeat-rich genomes.

In NBS gene family analysis, expectation values of 1.0 for BLAST searches and 10^(-4) for domain verification provide an effective balance between comprehensiveness and specificity [64] [11]. The manual curation step remains essential for removing false positives, particularly those containing kinase domains that can be confused with NBS domains due to smaller kinase subdomains [18].

Accurate detection of tandem and segmental duplications requires careful algorithm selection and parameter optimization tailored to specific research questions. For plant NBS gene research, where duplication events drive rapid evolution and functional diversification, optimized detection pipelines enable deeper understanding of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms. The continuing development of efficient algorithms like SEDEF for segmental duplications and ITD Assembler for tandem duplications, coupled with established methods for gene family classification, provides researchers with powerful tools for comparative genomic analysis.

As genomic sequencing technologies advance and more plant genomes become available, these optimized parameters and methodologies will prove increasingly valuable for unraveling the complex evolutionary history of disease resistance genes and other important gene families shaped by duplication events.

The nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) gene family constitutes the largest class of plant resistance (R) proteins, serving as critical intracellular immune receptors that recognize pathogen effectors and trigger robust defense responses [40] [10]. In the broader context of comparative genomic analysis across plant species, interpreting NBS gene expression patterns presents a significant challenge for researchers. Accurate distinction between constitutively low-baseline expression and genuine stress-responsive induction is essential for identifying functional NBS genes with potential applications in crop improvement. This guide provides a structured framework for analyzing NBS expression data, drawing on recent multi-species studies and experimental approaches to enable more accurate functional predictions.

Quantitative Expression Profiles: Baseline vs. Stress-Induced Patterns

Comparative analysis of NBS gene expression across multiple plant species reveals distinct quantitative patterns that help distinguish baseline expression from genuine stress responsiveness.

Table 1: Characteristic Expression Patterns of NBS Genes

Expression Profile Type	Typical Fold-Change	Expression Level Signature	Functional Correlation
Constitutively Low-Baseline	Minimal fluctuation	Below median expression level for all genes	Often pseudogenes or tightly regulated sensors
High Steady-State Baseline	<2x change after stress	Top 15% of expressed NLR transcripts	Enriched for functional immune receptors [65]
Genuinely Stress-Responsive	>2-5x induction	Low baseline, significant post-stress increase	Putative inducible resistance genes
Multi-Stress Responsive	Variable across stresses	Responsive to multiple stress types	Broad-spectrum resistance candidates [66]

Table 2: Documented NBS Expression Changes Under Specific Stress Conditions

Species	Stress Condition	NBS Genes Analyzed	Key Responsive Genes	Expression Pattern
Gossypium hirsutum (Cotton)	Cotton Leaf Curl Disease	Multiple CNL genes	OG2, OG6, OG15	Significant upregulation in tolerant accessions [6]
Malus domestica (Apple)	Alternaria alternata infection	miR482-regulated NBS genes	MdRNL1-5	Downregulation via miRNA pathway [67]
Lathyrus sativus (Grass Pea)	Salt stress	9 selected NBS genes	LsNBS-D18, LsNBS-D204	Differential regulation (50μM vs 200μM NaCl) [68]
Mangifera indica (Mango)	Disease & cold stress	47 MiCNL genes	MiACNL14	Multi-stress responsiveness [66]

Experimental Protocols for Expression Analysis

Genome-Wide Identification and Classification

Comprehensive identification of NBS-LRR genes is the foundational step in expression pattern analysis. The standard protocol involves using Hidden Markov Models (HMM) from InterPro or Pfam databases (e.g., NBS domain PF00931) to scan plant genomes [40] [6]. Candidate genes are then classified based on domain architecture into CNL (Coiled-Coil NBS-LRR), TNL (TIR-NBS-LRR), and RNL (RPW8-NBS-LRR) subfamilies. For species like Salvia miltiorrhiza, this approach identified 196 NBS-containing genes, of which 62 possessed complete N-terminal and LRR domains [40]. Subsequent phylogenetic analysis with reference sequences from model plants enables evolutionary classification and orthogroup assignment, facilitating cross-species comparisons.

Expression Profiling Methodologies

RNA-Sequencing Analysis

Bulk RNA-seq represents the standard approach for comprehensive NBS expression profiling. The protocol involves: (1) RNA extraction from stress-treated and control tissues at multiple timepoints; (2) library preparation and sequencing; (3) read alignment to the reference genome; (4) quantification of expression values (FPKM/TPM); and (5) differential expression analysis. For NBS genes, special consideration should be given to their typically low expression levels, which may require deeper sequencing. Studies across 34 plant species have successfully employed this approach to categorize NBS expression patterns under diverse biotic and abiotic stresses [6].

Validation via Quantitative PCR

qPCR validation provides precise measurement of expression changes for candidate NBS genes. The established protocol includes: (1) designing gene-specific primers avoiding conserved domains; (2) cDNA synthesis from RNA samples; (3) qPCR amplification with reference genes; and (4) calculation of fold-changes using the 2-ΔΔCt method. In grass pea, this approach confirmed the salt-responsiveness of several LsNBS genes, with most showing upregulation at different NaCl concentrations [68].

Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics

Emerging methodologies like single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics enable NBS expression analysis at cellular resolution, overcoming the limitations of bulk tissue analysis. These approaches are particularly valuable for understanding cell-type-specific NBS expression in response to localized pathogen infections.

Interpretation Framework for Expression Data

Distinguishing Functional Signatures

Recent evidence challenges the historical assumption that functional NLRs necessarily maintain low baseline expression. A cross-species analysis revealed that known functional NLRs are actually enriched among highly expressed transcripts in uninfected plants, with the top 15% of expressed NLR transcripts showing significant enrichment for functional genes [65]. This signature holds across both monocot and dicot species, suggesting that high steady-state expression may be a hallmark of functional NLRs rather than an exception.

Identifying Multi-Stress Responsive Genes

Machine learning approaches provide powerful tools for identifying NBS genes with broad stress responsiveness. Random Forest classifiers and similar algorithms can integrate expression data from multiple stress conditions to pinpoint genes like MiACNL14 in mango, which demonstrates responsiveness to both disease and cold stress [66]. These multi-stress responsive genes represent particularly valuable candidates for breeding programs aimed at enhancing crop resilience to multiple challenges.

Contextualizing Expression Changes

Proper interpretation of NBS expression dynamics requires consideration of several contextual factors:

• Tissue specificity: Some NLRs show tissue-specific expression patterns relevant to their function, such as NRC6 in tomato roots versus leaves [65].
• Temporal dynamics: The timing of expression peaks post-stress provides clues to functional roles, with early responders often involved in initial detection and later responders in amplification of defense signals.
• Isoform expression: Multiple isoforms of NLRs may be present in transcriptomes, with functional specificity potentially restricted to particular isoforms, as demonstrated for Rpi-amr1 [65].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for NBS Gene Expression Studies

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function in Research
Domain Databases	Pfam, InterPro, CDD	Identification of NBS and associated domains through HMM profiles [6]
Genomic Resources	PlantGARDEN, Sol Genomics Network, MangoBase	Access to annotated genomes for various species [66] [69]
Expression Databases	IPF Database, CottonFGD, NCBI BioProjects	RNA-seq data for expression profiling across tissues and stresses [6]
Analysis Tools	OrthoFinder, MUSCLE, MEME	Phylogenetic analysis and motif identification [6] [68]
Validation Reagents	Gene-specific primers, SYBR Green, reference genes	qPCR validation of expression patterns [68]

Signaling Pathways and Regulatory Networks

The diagram below illustrates the key regulatory pathways influencing NBS gene expression and the experimental workflow for distinguishing expression patterns.

NBS Gene Regulation and Analysis Workflow

Comparative Analysis Across Plant Lineages

The evolutionary history of NBS genes across plant species reveals significant variation in subfamily composition and expression patterns. In dicots like Salvia miltiorrhiza, comparative genomics shows a marked reduction in TNL and RNL subfamily members, with 61 CNLs but only 1 RNL and minimal TNL representation [40] [10]. Monocots like Oryza sativa have completely lost TNL and RNL subfamilies [40]. These evolutionary trajectories influence expression pattern interpretation, as the remaining subfamilies may exhibit functional specialization and distinct regulatory networks.

Distinguishing between low-baseline and stress-responsive NBS genes requires integrated analysis of evolutionary context, expression signatures, and regulatory networks. The emerging paradigm recognizes that functional NLRs often maintain substantial baseline expression rather than being strictly repressed, with specific expression thresholds potentially necessary for resistance function [65]. By applying the systematic framework outlined in this guide—combining genomic identification, multi-condition expression profiling, machine learning classification, and functional validation—researchers can more accurately identify promising NBS candidates for crop improvement programs aimed at enhancing disease resistance and stress resilience.

This comparison guide details a targeted investigation into the genetic basis of disease resistance in cotton, framed within a broader, multi-species study of Nucleotide-Binding Site (NBS) domain genes. NBS genes constitute one of the largest superfamilies of disease resistance (R) genes, central to plant innate immunity [70] [71]. A recent comparative analysis of 34 plant species, from mosses to monocots and dicots, identified 12,820 NBS-encoding genes, revealing significant diversification and numerous species-specific structural patterns [70]. This case study zooms in on a specific finding from that larger research effort: the genetic variation between susceptible (Gossypium hirsutum 'Coker 312') and tolerant ('Mac7') cotton accessions in their response to Cotton Leaf Curl Disease (CLCuD) [70]. We will objectively compare the experimental approaches and findings that pinpoint key genetic variants, providing supporting data and methodologies relevant for researchers and drug development professionals seeking to understand plant resistance mechanisms.

The research employed a multi-faceted approach to identify and validate the genetic variants and specific NBS genes responsible for disease tolerance. The following diagram outlines the key steps in the experimental workflow, from initial genetic screening to functional validation.

Key Comparative Data and Findings

Genetic Variant Burden in NBS Genes

The cornerstone of the comparison was a genome-wide analysis of genetic variants within NBS genes between the susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) accessions. The study identified a substantial difference in the number of unique variants, as summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Summary of Genetic Variants in NBS Genes of Cotton Accessions

Accession	Phenotype	Number of Unique Variants in NBS Genes
Mac7	Tolerant to CLCuD	6,583 [70]
Coker 312	Susceptible to CLCuD	5,173 [70]

The data indicates that the tolerant Mac7 genotype possesses a greater number of genetic variants within its NBS gene repertoire. This higher genetic diversity could contribute to a broader and more robust defense response, potentially enabling the recognition of a wider array of pathogen effectors [70].

Expression Profiling of Key Orthogroups

Beyond simple presence/absence of variants, expression profiling under various biotic and abiotic stresses identified specific NBS orthogroups (OGs) with putative roles in defense. The larger study classified NBS genes into 603 orthogroups, with some being "core" (common across species) and others being "unique" (species-specific) [70]. The expression analysis highlighted three orthogroups of particular interest:

• OG2, OG6, and OG15: These orthogroups showed putative upregulation in different tissues under various stresses in both susceptible and tolerant plants [70].
• OG2 (GaNBS): This orthogroup was selected for further functional validation via Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), which demonstrated its putative role in controlling virus titer [70].

Protein Interaction Analysis

To understand the mechanism of action, protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction studies were conducted. The research demonstrated a strong interaction of certain putative NBS proteins with ADP/ATP, which is consistent with the known function of the NBS domain as a molecular switch in signal transduction [70]. Furthermore, these NBS proteins showed strong interactions with different core proteins of the Cotton Leaf Curl Disease virus, suggesting a direct or indirect role in pathogen recognition [70].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

For researchers seeking to replicate or build upon this work, the following key methodologies were central to the findings.

Protocol 1: Genome-Wide Identification and Classification of NBS Genes

The foundational step involved the systematic identification and classification of NBS genes, a method also used in other focused cotton studies [71] [72].

• HMMER Search: The protein sequences of the annotated genomes are searched using HMMER software with the NB-ARC (PF00931) hidden Markov model (HMM) profile from the Pfam database. A stringent e-value cut-off (e.g., 1x10⁻¹⁵) is typically applied [71] [72].
• Domain Architecture Analysis: The candidate genes are analyzed for additional domains using tools like InterProScan and SMART. Key domains include:
  • N-terminal: TIR (Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor), CC (Coiled-Coil), or RPW8.
  • C-terminal: LRR (Leucine-Rich Repeat) domains.
• Classification: Genes are classified based on their domain combinations (e.g., TNL, CNL, NL, RNL) [71].
• Orthogroup Analysis: Genes are clustered into orthogroups across multiple species using tools like OrthoFinder to identify evolutionarily conserved groups [70].

Protocol 2: Genetic Variation Analysis

This protocol identifies sequence-level differences between accessions.

• Sequence Alignment: Whole-genome sequencing reads from each accession (Coker 312 and Mac7) are aligned to a reference genome.
• Variant Calling: Bioinformatics tools (e.g., GATK) are used to call Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Insertions/Deletions (InDels).
• Variant Annotation: The identified variants are annotated to determine their genomic location, particularly focusing on those within the previously identified NBS genes.
• Variant Filtering: Variants are filtered based on quality scores, read depth, and other parameters to ensure high-confidence calls.

Protocol 3: Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) for Functional Validation

VIGS is a powerful technique for rapid functional analysis of genes in plants [70].

• Vector Construction: A fragment (typically 200-500 bp) of the target gene (e.g., GaNBS from OG2) is cloned into a VIGS vector, such as those based on Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV).
• Plant Agro-infiltration: The recombinant vector is transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The bacterial culture is then infiltrated into the cotyledons or true leaves of young cotton plants.
• Phenotypic Assessment: After silencing the target gene, plants are challenged with the pathogen (e.g., CLCuD virus). The disease severity and viral titer are compared between silenced plants and control plants (infected with an empty vector).
• Gene Silencing Confirmation: The knockdown of target gene expression is confirmed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table lists key reagents and solutions used in the featured experiments and this field of research.

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for NBS Gene Analysis

Research Reagent / Solution	Function / Application
HMMER Software with NB-ARC (PF00931) HMM Profile	Core bioinformatics tool for the genome-wide identification of NBS-encoding genes from sequenced genomes [71] [72].
InterProScan / SMART Database	Used for detailed protein domain architecture analysis to classify NBS genes into subfamilies (TNL, CNL, etc.) [71].
VIGS Vectors (e.g., TRV-based)	Essential for rapid in planta functional validation of candidate NBS genes by transiently knocking down their expression [70].
Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) Assays	A cost-effective, high-throughput genotyping platform for validating SNPs and tracking specific genetic variants in breeding populations [73] [74].
qRT-PCR Reagents	For quantifying the expression levels of target NBS genes in different tissues under various stress conditions [70] [75].

Relationship Between NBS Gene Architecture and Disease Resistance

The comparative analysis across cotton species reveals a connection between the structural architecture of NBS genes and observed disease resistance. The following diagram synthesizes the key relationships identified in the broader research.

This case study demonstrates a coherent strategy for moving from broad genomic comparisons to a focused understanding of disease resistance mechanisms in cotton. The integration of comparative genomics, expression profiling, and functional validation provides a powerful framework for pinpointing causal genetic variants. The finding that the tolerant Mac7 accession harbors a greater number of variants within its NBS gene repertoire, coupled with the confirmed role of the GaNBS (OG2) gene, offers tangible targets for marker-assisted breeding. These results, contextualized within the larger multi-species analysis, underscore the critical role of NBS gene diversity and specific gene families like TNLs in plant immunity. For researchers, this guide highlights the essential protocols and reagents needed to undertake similar analyses in other crops, ultimately contributing to the development of more resilient agricultural varieties.

Validation and Cross-Species Insights: Linking Genetic Variation to Disease Resistance

Within the complex architecture of plant immune systems, nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes encode a critical line of defense against pathogen invasion. These genes, particularly those belonging to the NBS-leucine-rich repeat (LRR) family, function as intracellular immune receptors that detect pathogen effector molecules and initiate robust defense responses [1]. A comprehensive comparative analysis across 34 plant species, from mosses to monocots and dicots, identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes, classifying them into 168 distinct architectural classes [6] [70]. Among these, orthogroup 2 (OG2) emerged as a core conserved group with putative immune functions. This guide details the functional validation of GaNBS (OG2) from cotton through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), comparing its performance against other established disease resistance validation methodologies.

Experimental Background: GaNBS (OG2) in Plant Immunity

NBS-LRR Protein Structure and Function

Plant NBS-LRR proteins are modular intracellular receptors characterized by:

• N-terminal domain: Either a Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) or coiled-coil (CC) motif that determines signaling pathway specificity [1]
• Central NBS domain: Functions as a molecular switch through ATP binding and hydrolysis, regulating activation status [1] [76]
• C-terminal LRR domain: Provides recognition specificity through variable solvent-exposed residues that interact with pathogen effectors [1]

In the resting state, NBS-LRR proteins maintain autoinhibition through intramolecular interactions between domains. The CC domain interacts physically with the NBS-LRR region, while the LRR domain encloses NB-ARC and CC/TIR domains to prevent nucleotide exchange [77] [76]. Pathogen effector recognition triggers conformational changes that disrupt these interactions, enabling the protein to assume an active signaling state [76].

GaNBS (OG2) Identification and Characteristics

The GaNBS gene belongs to orthogroup 2 (OG2), identified through genome-wide analysis of 34 plant species as one of several core orthogroups with conserved functions across plant lineages [6] [70]. Expression profiling revealed significant upregulation of OG2 genes across various tissues under multiple biotic and abiotic stresses in both susceptible and tolerant cotton accessions, suggesting its fundamental role in stress response pathways [70]. Genetic variation analysis between cotton accessions with contrasting responses to cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) identified 6,583 unique variants in tolerant (Mac7) and 5,173 in susceptible (Coker 312) accessions, further supporting the importance of natural variation in NBS genes for disease resistance [6].

Table 1: Key Characteristics of GaNBS (OG2) and Related NBS Genes

Feature	GaNBS (OG2)	Classical NBS-LRR	Species-Specific Variants
Domain Architecture	NBS domain with associated structural patterns	NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR	TIR-NBS-TIR-Cupin1, TIR-NBS-Prenyltransf, Sugartr-NBS
Evolutionary Conservation	Core orthogroup with conservation across species	Moderate to high conservation	Limited to specific lineages
Expression Pattern	Upregulated under biotic and abiotic stresses in multiple tissues	Stress-responsive and tissue-specific	Variable expression patterns
Genetic Variation	6,583 variants in tolerant accession; 5,173 in susceptible	Subject to diversifying selection	High species-specific variation

VIGS Methodology for Functional Validation

Principles of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing

VIGS harnesses the plant's natural RNA interference (RNAi) antiviral defense mechanism to transiently downregulate endogenous gene expression [78]. The technology involves engineering viral vectors to carry fragments of target plant genes, which when delivered into plants, trigger sequence-specific degradation of complementary mRNA transcripts [78] [79]. This approach enables rapid functional analysis without requiring stable transformation.

Experimental Protocol for GaNBS Silencing

The functional validation of GaNBS employed the following methodology [6] [70]:

• Vector Selection and Preparation: A begomovirus-based VIGS vector was selected due to its compatibility with cotton and relevance to cotton leaf curl disease pathogenesis.

• Insert Design: A specific fragment of the GaNBS (OG2) gene was cloned into the VIGS vector in antisense or hairpin orientation to optimize silencing efficiency.

• Plant Material: Resistant cotton plants were selected for silencing to demonstrate the function of GaNBS in established resistance.

• Delivery Method: Agrobacterium-mediated inoculation was performed, using cultures optimized with 1 mM MES and 20 μM acetosyringone to enhance transformation efficiency.

• Environmental Conditions: Plants were maintained at 28°C and 80% relative humidity post-inoculation to promote viral spread and silencing efficacy.

• Validation: Silencing efficiency was quantified through RT-PCR analysis of GaNBS transcript levels, typically showing 40-80% reduction in expression.

• Phenotypic Assessment: Virus titer was measured in silenced plants to evaluate the functional consequence of GaNBS downregulation.

Diagram 1: VIGS experimental workflow for functional validation of GaNBS in virus resistance. The process involves sequential steps from vector preparation through final analysis, with critical parameters optimized for cotton systems.

Comparative Performance of VIGS Validation

GaNBS Silencing Results

The functional validation of GaNBS through VIGS yielded compelling evidence for its role in virus resistance [6] [70]:

• Silencing Efficiency: VIGS-mediated silencing achieved significant reduction (40-80%) in GaNBS transcript accumulation in resistant cotton plants.

• Phenotypic Consequence: Silenced plants showed increased virus accumulation compared to non-silenced controls, demonstrating compromised resistance.

• Specificity: The effect was specific to GaNBS silencing, as control vectors without the GaNBS insert did not alter resistance phenotypes.

• Mechanistic Insight: Protein-ligand interaction studies revealed strong binding of putative NBS proteins from OG2 with ADP/ATP and various core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus, suggesting a direct role in pathogen recognition [6].

Comparison with Alternative Validation Methods

Table 2: Comparison of Gene Function Validation Methods in Plants

Method	Time Requirement	Technical Complexity	Functional Insight	Applications in Resistance Gene Validation
VIGS	3-6 weeks	Moderate	Transcript-level knockdown with phenotypic correlation	Rapid validation of candidate R genes; GaNBS in cotton; Xa38 in rice [79]
Stable Transformation	6-12 months	High	Overexpression or knockout/mutant analysis	Definitive proof of gene function; Xa21, Xa23 in rice [79]
TILLING/EcoTILLING	3-9 months	Moderate to High	Natural or induced allele analysis	Identification of novel resistance alleles; genetic diversity studies
Protein-Protein Interaction	4-8 weeks	Moderate	Molecular mechanism and pathways	Identification of guardee proteins and signaling components [76]
Heterologous Expression	4-8 weeks	Moderate	Functional transfer across species	Broad-spectrum resistance engineering

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for VIGS-Based Functional Validation

Reagent/Resource	Function in Validation	Examples in GaNBS Study	Alternative/Complementary Options
VIGS Vectors	Delivery of silencing construct into plant cells	Begomovirus-based vector for cotton	BSMV for cereals [78]; TRV for solanaceae; WDV for rice [80]
Agrobacterium Strains	Mediate plant transformation	GV3101 for cotton transformation	EHA105 for rice [79]; LBA4404
Plant Genotypes	Provide genetic background for testing	Resistant G. arboreum and tolerant Mac7 cotton	Susceptible Coker 312 as control [6]
Pathogen Strains	Challenge inoculum for resistance assays	Cotton leaf curl disease virus (begomovirus)	Xanthomonas oryzae for rice BB [79]; Magnaporthe oryzae for blast [80]
Molecular Assays	Quantify silencing efficiency and pathogen load	RT-PCR for GaNBS transcripts; qPCR for virus titer	Northern blot; Western blot; ELISA
Antibodies	Detect protein expression and accumulation	Custom antibodies for NBS proteins	Tag-specific antibodies (HA, Myc, GFP)

Mechanistic Basis of GaNBS Function

The molecular function of GaNBS in virus resistance can be understood through the NBS-LRR activation mechanism. Plant NBS-LRR proteins normally exist in an autoinhibited state where the C-terminal LRR domain encloses NB-ARC and CC/TIR domains, preventing nucleotide exchange [77] [76]. Viral effector proteins, such as coat proteins or replication factors, interact with specific domains of the NBS-LRR protein, triggering conformational changes that disrupt these intramolecular interactions [77] [76].

For GaNBS, protein-ligand interaction studies demonstrated strong binding with ADP/ATP, highlighting its function as a molecular switch dependent on nucleotide status [6]. Additionally, interaction with core proteins of the cotton leaf curl disease virus suggests direct or indirect recognition of viral components. Upon activation, GaNBS likely initiates downstream signaling cascades that culminate in defense responses including hypersensitive cell death and systemic acquired resistance, limiting viral replication and movement.

Diagram 2: Proposed mechanistic pathway of GaNBS-mediated virus resistance. GaNBS transitions from an autoinhibited state to an active signaling complex upon viral recognition, initiating multiple defense responses that limit virus accumulation.

The functional validation of GaNBS (OG2) through VIGS provides compelling evidence for its essential role in cotton's defense against cotton leaf curl disease. This orthogroup represents a conserved component of the plant immune system across multiple species, with natural variation contributing to differences in disease resistance. The VIGS methodology offers distinct advantages for rapid functional characterization compared to stable transformation approaches, particularly for recalcitrant species like cotton. The demonstration that silencing GaNBS compromises resistance in otherwise tolerant plants confirms its position as a key determinant of virus resistance. These findings not only advance our understanding of NBS gene function in plant immunity but also provide potential targets for marker-assisted breeding strategies to enhance disease resistance in cotton and related species.

Nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain proteins, particularly those belonging to the NBS-LRR (nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat) family, serve as critical intracellular immune receptors in plants, enabling detection of diverse pathogen effectors and initiation of robust defense responses [81] [51]. Within the context of a broader comparative analysis of NBS genes across 34 plant species, this guide examines the molecular mechanisms underlying NBS protein interactions with viral pathogens. We focus specifically on ligand binding characteristics and structural interactions that facilitate pathogen recognition and immune signaling. The objective analysis presented herein integrates findings from genome-wide studies, functional validation experiments, and structural analyses to provide researchers with a comprehensive resource on NBS-viral protein interactions.

Biological Context of NBS-Viral Protein Interactions

NBS Protein Domain Architecture and Classification

NBS-LRR proteins represent one of the largest gene families in plants, with substantial variation in copy number across species. A recent comparative analysis of 34 plant species identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes, classifying them into 168 distinct domain architecture patterns [6]. These proteins typically function as molecular switches within plant immune signaling pathways, with their nucleotide-binding state governing activation status.

Table 1: NBS-LRR Gene Classification and Distribution Across Selected Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NBS Genes	CNL Subfamily	TNL Subfamily	Other NBS Types	Key Viral Pathogens
Nicotiana tabacum	603	23.3%	2.5%	45.5% NBS-only	TMV, PVX, TEV
Nicotiana sylvestris	344	Similar to N. tabacum	Similar to N. tabacum	Similar to N. tabacum	TMV, PVX
Nicotiana tomentosiformis	279	Similar to N. tabacum	Similar to N. tabacum	Similar to N. tabacum	TMV, PVX
Arabidopsis thaliana	~150	~60%	~40%	Included in totals	TuMV, CMV
Oryza sativa	>400	100%	0%	Included in totals	RSV, RDV

Note: CNL=CC-NBS-LRR; TNL=TIR-NBS-LRR; Percentage values represent proportion of total NBS genes. Data compiled from multiple sources [81] [6] [42].

NBS-LRR proteins are modular proteins characterized by three core domains: an N-terminal signaling domain (either coiled-coil [CC] or Toll/interleukin-1 receptor [TIR]), a central nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain, and a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) region [81] [51]. The NBS domain contains several conserved motifs including kinase 1a (P-loop), kinase 2, and kinase 3a, which facilitate nucleotide binding and exchange [76]. The LRR domain is primarily responsible for specific pathogen recognition, while the N-terminal domain determines downstream signaling specificity [51] [76].

Viral Recognition Mechanisms

Plant NBS-LRR proteins recognize viral pathogens through multiple mechanisms. Many function as "guard" proteins that monitor the status of host proteins targeted by viral effectors. For example, the NBS-LRR protein Rx from potato recognizes the coat protein (CP) of Potato virus X (PVX) and activates defense responses [76]. This recognition occurs through direct or indirect interaction between the viral effector and the LRR domain of the NBS-LRR protein, leading to conformational changes that activate downstream signaling.

Experimental Approaches for Studying NBS-Viral Protein Interactions

Domain Interaction Complementation Assays

Functional analysis of NBS protein interactions with viral pathogens has been elucidated through domain complementation assays. Research on the potato Rx protein (a CC-NBS-LRR protein) demonstrated that co-expression of separate CC-NBS and LRR domains reconstitutes functional activity, resulting in a coat protein-dependent hypersensitive response (HR) [76]. Similarly, the CC domain alone can complement an NBS-LRR fragment to restore function.

Key Experimental Protocol: Domain Complementation Assay

• Cloning: Generate constructs encoding separate Rx protein domains (CC-NBS and LRR) with appropriate epitope tags (e.g., HA tag)
• Transient Expression: Express domain constructs individually and in combination in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation
• Elicitor Co-expression: Co-express viral elicitor (PVX coat protein) with domain combinations
• Phenotypic Monitoring: Assess reconstituted function through hypersensitive response (HR) cell death phenotype within 2-3 days post-infiltration
• Interaction Validation: Confirm physical interactions between domains via co-immunoprecipitation experiments [76]

This methodology established that viral recognition involves sequential disruption of intramolecular interactions between NBS-LRR domains, providing key insights into activation mechanisms.

Structural and Ligand Binding Studies

The NBS domain functions as a molecular switch regulated by nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. Specific binding and hydrolysis of ATP has been demonstrated for the NBS domains of tomato CNLs I2 and Mi, with ATP hydrolysis inducing conformational changes that regulate downstream signaling [81]. Viral effector recognition is believed to alter the nucleotide binding state, transitioning NBS-LRR proteins from inactive to active conformations.

Table 2: Experimentally Determined NBS Ligand Binding Properties

NBS Protein	Plant Source	Ligand Specificity	Binding Affinity	Functional Consequence	Viral Pathogen Targeted
Rx	Potato	ATP/ADP	Not quantified	Activation of HR response	Potato virus X (PVX)
I2	Tomato	ATP	Kd not specified	Hydrolysis activates signaling	Fusarium oxysporum
Mi	Tomato	ATP	Kd not specified	Hydrolysis activates signaling	Root-knot nematode
N	Tobacco	ATP/ADP	Not quantified	Oligomerization upon activation	Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)
L6	Flax	ATP/ADP	Not quantified	Conformational change	Flax rust fungus

Note: Direct quantitative binding data for NBS domains with viral proteins is limited in current literature, with most evidence inferred from functional studies.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Approaches

Comparative genomic analyses across multiple plant species have revealed significant diversification of NBS genes involved in viral recognition. Expression profiling of NBS genes in cotton under cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) pressure demonstrated upregulation of specific orthogroups (OG2, OG6, and OG15) in response to viral infection [6]. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton confirmed its essential role in antiviral defense, resulting in increased viral titers when silenced [6].

Genetic variation analysis between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions identified numerous unique variants in NBS genes, with Mac7 displaying 6,583 variants compared to 5,173 in Coker312 [6]. These variations potentially affect ligand binding specificity and interaction capabilities with viral proteins.

NBS Signaling Pathways in Antiviral Defense

The following diagram illustrates the coordinated domain interactions and signaling events in NBS-mediated viral recognition:

This activation pathway demonstrates how viral protein perception triggers conformational changes that alter nucleotide binding status, ultimately leading to defense activation. The NBS domain serves as the central regulatory switch in this process.

Research Reagent Solutions for NBS-Viral Interaction Studies

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for NBS-Viral Protein Interaction Studies

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Experimental Function	Application Examples in Literature
Epitope Tags	HA, FLAG, GFP	Protein detection, localization, and co-immunoprecipitation	Rx domain interaction studies [76]
Expression Systems	Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression, Yeast Surface Display	Heterologous protein expression and interaction screening	Rx functional assays [76], Nb isolation [82]
Library Platforms	Synthetic nanobody libraries, Phage display	Identification of protein-binding partners	PCSK9-specific nanobody isolation [82]
Genetic Selection Systems	FLI-TRAP (Tat-based recognition)	Selection of specific binding proteins in bacterial systems	Nanobody affinity maturation [82]
Virus Screening Tools	VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing)	Functional validation of NBS genes in plant immunity	GaNBS role in CLCuD resistance [6]
Genomic Databases	Plaza, Phytozome, NCBI	Identification and classification of NBS gene families	Comparative analysis of 34 plant species [6]

The investigation of NBS ligand binding and interactions with viral pathogen proteins reveals a sophisticated plant immune system characterized by specific molecular recognition events and carefully regulated activation mechanisms. The integrated experimental approaches discussed herein—from domain interaction studies to genomic analyses—provide researchers with multiple avenues for exploring these critical plant-pathogen interactions. The continuing diversification of NBS genes across plant species, coupled with their precise regulation by nucleotide binding and intramolecular interactions, highlights the dynamic co-evolutionary arms race between plants and their viral pathogens. These insights not only advance fundamental understanding of plant immunity but also inform strategies for developing durable resistance against economically significant viral diseases in crop species.

Plant genomes possess a sophisticated immune system primarily governed by a large family of disease resistance (R) genes. Among these, genes encoding nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domains represent the most prominent class, playing a critical role in effector-triggered immunity (ETI) by recognizing pathogen-derived molecules and initiating defense responses [41] [50]. The evolution of NBS-encoding genes is characterized by remarkable diversity in copy number, structural variation, and genomic distribution across different plant lineages. These variations arise from evolutionary pressures exerted by rapidly co-evolving pathogens, leading to species-specific patterns of gene expansion, contraction, and diversification [6] [83]. Comparative genomics provides powerful tools to decipher these evolutionary patterns, offering insights into plant-pathogen co-evolution and facilitating the identification of potential resistance genes for crop improvement.

This guide presents a systematic comparison of NBS-encoding gene evolution across three economically significant plant groups: Brassica (family Brassicaceae), Ipomoea (family Convolvulaceae), and selected members of the Asteraceae family. By synthesizing data from multiple genome-wide studies, we objectively compare the quantitative distribution, genomic organization, duplication mechanisms, and evolutionary trajectories of NBS genes in these lineages, providing a framework for understanding their differential adaptation to pathogen pressures.

Quantitative Comparative Analysis of NBS Genes

Genome-wide identification of NBS-encoding genes reveals significant variation in abundance and composition across plant families. The following tables summarize key quantitative findings from comparative genomic studies.

Table 1: Comparative overview of NBS-encoding genes in Brassica, Ipomoea, and representative Asteraceae species

Plant Group/Species	Ploidy	Total NBS Genes	CNL	TNL	RNL	Other Types	% in Clusters
Brassica
B. napus	Allotetraploid	464	233	15	-	216	~60%
B. rapa	Diploid	202	101	7	-	94	~65%
B. oleracea	Diploid	146	73	5	-	68	~55%
Ipomoea
I. batatas (sweet potato)	Hexaploid	889	327	194	41	327	83.13%
I. nil	Diploid	757	278	165	35	279	86.39%
I. trifida	Diploid	554	204	121	26	203	76.71%
I. triloba	Diploid	571	210	125	27	209	90.37%
Asteraceae
Lactuca sativa (lettuce)	Diploid	~450 (estimated)	~60%	~35%	~5%	-	~80%
Helianthus annuus (sunflower)	Diploid	~350 (estimated)	~65%	~30%	~5%	-	~75%

Table 2: Evolutionary patterns and duplication mechanisms of NBS genes

Plant Group	Dominant Duplication Type	Evolutionary Pattern	Selection Pressure (Ka/Ks)	Notable Features
Brassica	Tandem & whole-genome duplication	"Birth-and-death" with lineage-specific expansion	Mostly <1 (purifying selection)	Significant gene loss post-polyploidization; C-genome diversification in B. napus
Ipomoea	Segmental (polyploids); Tandem (diploids)	Species-specific expansion	<1 (purifying selection) in syntenic orthologs	High cluster formation; differential retention in polyploid genomes
Asteraceae	Tandem & segmental	"Birth-and-death" with rapid turnover	Variable, with signs of positive selection in LRR domains	High diversity; abundant truncated genes; rapid lineage-specific evolution

Detailed Evolutionary Patterns by Plant Group

Brassica Species Complex

The Brassica genus exemplifies the impact of polyploidization on NBS gene evolution. Following whole-genome triplication in the Brassica ancestor, NBS genes experienced differential evolutionary trajectories in diploid and allopolyploid species [50] [84].

Genomic Distribution and Conservation: In B. napus, the allotetraploid derived from B. rapa (A genome) and B. oleracea (C genome), the A genome retained similar NBS gene numbers (191 genes) to its diploid progenitor B. rapa (202 genes). Strikingly, the C subgenome of B. napus contains significantly more NBS genes (273) than its diploid progenitor B. oleracea (146), indicating substantial post-polyploidization diversification in the C genome [84]. Homology analysis reveals that 87.1% of B. rapa NBS genes have orthologs in B. napus, compared to only 66.4% from B. oleracea, suggesting more extensive gene loss or diversification in the C lineage [84].

Expression and Functional Specialization: Approximately 60% of NBS genes in Brassica species show highest expression in root tissues, indicating tissue-specific functional specialization [84]. Co-localization analysis with resistance quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified 204 NBS genes in B. napus located within 71 disease resistance QTL intervals against major pathogens like blackleg, clubroot, and Sclerotinia stem rot. Most genes were associated with resistance to a single disease, while 47 genes co-localized with QTLs for two diseases, and three genes were associated with all three diseases, suggesting potential broad-spectrum resistance candidates [84].

Ipomoea Species Complex

The Ipomoea genus displays distinctive patterns of NBS gene evolution, particularly in the hexaploid sweet potato (I. batatas) compared to its diploid relatives [41] [49] [85].

Ploidy Effects and Gene Retention: The hexaploid I. batatas contains 889 NBS genes, substantially more than its diploid relatives I. trifida (554 genes), I. triloba (571 genes), and I. nil (757 genes). This pattern contrasts with Brassica, where polyploidization was followed by more extensive gene loss [41]. Sweet potato shows a predominance of segmental duplications (likely associated with its hexaploid nature), while the diploid Ipomoea species exhibit more tandem duplications, indicating different mechanisms of gene family expansion operating in lineages with different ploidy histories [41].

Structural Diversity and Conservation: Phylogenetic analysis of Ipomoea NBS genes reveals three monophyletic clades corresponding to CNL, TNL, and RNL subtypes, distinguished by characteristic amino acid motifs [41]. The CN-type (CC-NBS) and N-type (NBS-only) genes are more prevalent than full-length CNL types across all Ipomoea species. A syntenic analysis identified 201 orthologous gene pairs shared between any two of the four Ipomoea species, indicating conservation of ancestral NBS genes despite species-specific expansions [41].

Asteraceae Family

While comprehensive comparative genomics across Asteraceae is limited in the searched literature, patterns can be inferred from studies of individual species and broader angiosperm comparisons [6].

Diversity and Evolutionary Dynamics: Asteraceae species typically possess several hundred NBS genes, with CNL-types predominating over TNL-types, similar to other eudicots [6]. The "birth-and-death" evolutionary model characterizes NBS gene evolution in Asteraceae, with frequent gene duplications and losses creating lineage-specific repertoires. Tandem duplication plays a significant role in generating novel resistance specificities, with genes often organized in complex clusters [6].

Genomic Organization: Similar to patterns observed in other plant families, NBS genes in Asteraceae genomes show non-random, uneven distribution across chromosomes, with a high percentage (75-80%) organized in clusters. This genomic architecture facilitates the generation of diversity through unequal crossing-over and gene conversion [6].

Experimental Protocols for Comparative NBS Gene Analysis

Standardized methodologies enable consistent identification and characterization of NBS-encoding genes across species. The following protocols represent consensus approaches from multiple comparative genomic studies.

Genome-Wide Identification Pipeline

Data Collection: Retrieve whole-genome sequences and annotated protein datasets from public databases (NCBI, Phytozome, Ensembl Plants, species-specific databases) [50] [12]. For Ipomoea studies, data was obtained from Ipomoea Genome Hub and GenBank BioProject (PRJNA428214 for I. trifida) [41].

HMMER-based Domain Identification: Employ HMMER v3.0 with Pfam hidden Markov models (HMMs) for NBS (NB-ARC, PF00931), TIR (PF01582), and LRR (PF00560, PF07723, PF07725, PF12799, PF13306, PF13516, PF13855, PF14580) domains using trusted cutoff thresholds [50] [12]. For Brassica studies, researchers constructed species-specific NBS profiles using "hmmbuild" after initial identification [50].

Coiled-Coil Domain Prediction: Apply multiple prediction tools (PAIRCOIL2 with P-score cutoff of 0.025; MARCOIL with threshold probability of 90%) to identify CC domains, retaining overlapping predictions as high-confidence candidates [50] [25].

Manual Curation and Validation: Remove redundant and partial sequences; verify domain organization through PfamScan, SMART, and CDD databases; classify genes into structural categories (CNL, TNL, RNL, CN, TN, NL, N) based on domain composition [6] [12].

Diagram 1: NBS gene identification workflow

Evolutionary Analysis Methods

Phylogenetic Reconstruction: Perform multiple sequence alignment of NBS domains using MAFFT v7.0 or CLUSTALW; construct maximum-likelihood trees with FastTreeMP or RAxML with 1000 bootstrap replicates; classify genes into orthologous groups using OrthoFinder v2.5.1 with DIAMOND for sequence similarity and MCL for clustering [6] [50].

Duplication Pattern Analysis: Identify tandem duplicates as adjacent NBS genes on same chromosome with ≤1 intervening gene; detect segmental duplicates through syntenic block analysis using MCScanX; calculate Ka/Ks ratios (ω) using PAML or similar packages, with ω<1 indicating purifying selection, ω=1 indicating neutral evolution, and ω>1 suggesting positive selection [41] [6].

Expression Profiling: Analyze RNA-seq data from public repositories (NCBI GEO, SRA); calculate FPKM or TPM values; identify differentially expressed genes using DESeq2 or edgeR; validate key candidates via qRT-PCR with specific primers [41] [6].

Plant Immunity Signaling Pathways Involving NBS Genes

NBS-LRR proteins function as critical intracellular immune receptors in the effector-triggered immunity (ETI) pathway. The following diagram illustrates the core signaling mechanisms.

Diagram 2: NBS-mediated immunity signaling pathway

NBS-LRR proteins operate through two primary recognition mechanisms: direct recognition involves physical binding between the NBS-LRR protein and pathogen effector, while indirect recognition occurs through detection of effector-induced modifications to host proteins (guard hypothesis) [41] [83]. Upon activation, CNL and TNL proteins initiate signaling cascades that often require helper NLRs (RNL class) for full immune activation, leading to hypersensitive response (HR) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) [41] [12].

Table 3: Key research reagents and computational tools for NBS gene analysis

Category	Resource/Tool	Specific Application	Key Features
Domain Databases	Pfam (PF00931, PF01582)	NBS and TIR domain identification	Curated HMM profiles for domain detection
	CDD, SMART, InterPro	Multi-domain architecture validation	Integrated domain databases
Prediction Tools	HMMER v3.0	Initial NBS gene identification	Hidden Markov Model implementation
	PAIRCOIL2, MARCOIL	Coiled-coil domain prediction	CC domain identification with statistical confidence
	MEME Suite	Conserved motif discovery	Identifies novel NBS-associated motifs
Evolutionary Analysis	OrthoFinder v2.5.1	Orthogroup inference	Gene family clustering across species
	MCScanX	Synteny and duplication analysis	Identifies WGD, tandem, segmental duplications
	PAML	Selection pressure (Ka/Ks) calculation	Detects purifying/positive selection
Expression Analysis	DESeq2, edgeR	Differential expression analysis	Statistical analysis of RNA-seq data
	qRT-PCR reagents	Expression validation	Experimental confirmation of candidate genes

This comparative guide reveals both conserved and lineage-specific evolutionary patterns of NBS-encoding genes across Brassica, Ipomoea, and Asteraceae. Key findings include the significant impact of polyploidization on NBS gene evolution, with differential retention patterns between Brassica and Ipomoea lineages, the prevalence of gene clustering across all families, and the dominant role of purifying selection in maintaining NBS gene function while allowing for diversifying selection in specific pathogen-recognition residues.

The experimental protocols and resources provided offer a standardized framework for future comparative studies, enabling consistent identification and characterization of NBS genes across additional plant families. These analyses not only illuminate the evolutionary dynamics of plant immune genes but also facilitate the identification of candidate resistance genes for crop improvement programs across these economically important plant families.

Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis has emerged as a powerful functional genomics approach for correlating genetic variation with gene expression levels, thereby illuminating the molecular mechanisms through which genetic variants influence phenotypic traits. When applied to disease resistance research, particularly in the context of Nucleotide-Binding Site-Leucine-Rich Repeat (NBS-LRR) genes—the largest class of plant resistance (R) genes—eQTL mapping enables researchers to identify genetic regulators of defense gene expression [6] [25]. This approach is revolutionizing our understanding of how plants and other organisms deploy their innate immune systems against pathogens.

The integration of eQTL analysis with resistance gene studies is particularly valuable because most disease-associated genetic variants identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) reside in non-coding regions of the genome [86] [87]. These non-coding variants likely influence disease resistance by regulating the expression of key immune response genes rather than altering protein structure directly. By mapping genetic variants to expression changes in NBS-LRR genes and other defense-related genes, eQTL analysis provides critical functional annotations for resistance loci and helps prioritize candidate genes for breeding applications [88] [86].

This guide provides a comparative framework for implementing eQTL analyses focused on resistance phenotypes, with particular emphasis on experimental design, methodological considerations, and interpretation of results within the context of a broader comparative analysis of NBS genes across 34 plant species [6].

Fundamental Principles of eQTL Analysis in Resistance Research

Classification and Functional Domains of NBS-LRR Resistance Genes

NBS-LRR genes constitute a major family of disease resistance genes in plants, characterized by conserved nucleotide-binding site (NBS) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains [25]. Based on their N-terminal domains, these genes are classified into several major subfamilies:

• TNL genes: Contain Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domains and are involved in signal recognition and transduction [6] [25]
• CNL genes: Feature coiled-coil (CC) domains that facilitate protein-protein interactions [6] [25]
• RNL genes: Possess Resistance to Powdery Mildew 8 (RPW8) domains and function as "helper" proteins in downstream signaling [6] [49]

The NBS domain contains several conserved motifs (P-loop, RNBS-A, kinase-2, RNBS-B, RNBS-C, and GLPL) essential for ATP/GTP binding and resistance signaling [25]. The LRR domain, by contrast, exhibits high variability that enables pathogen-specific recognition [25]. Understanding these structural distinctions is crucial for interpreting how genetic variation might affect gene function and expression in eQTL studies.

Regulatory Mechanisms Underlying eQTLs

eQTLs represent genomic regions where genetic variation correlates with expression levels of target genes. They are broadly categorized based on their genomic position relative to the gene they influence:

• cis-eQTLs: Located near the gene whose expression they regulate, typically within ±1 Mb of the transcription start site, often affecting regulatory elements such as promoters or enhancers [86]
• trans-eQTLs: Located distant from the regulated gene (>5 Mb away or on different chromosomes), often involving transcription factors or signaling components that regulate multiple genes [86]

In disease resistance contexts, eQTLs may influence the expression of NBS-LRR genes directly or modulate components of defense signaling pathways. For example, a recent study on European sea bass identified a major QTL for resistance to viral nervous necrosis where the resistant genotype was associated with altered expression of interferon-responsive genes (IFI27L2 and IFI27L2A) [88].

Experimental Design and Methodological Frameworks

Population Design and Sample Collection

The statistical power of eQTL mapping depends critically on population structure and sample size. Several experimental designs are commonly employed:

• Genetic mapping populations: F1 populations derived from crosses between resistant and susceptible genotypes, such as the Actinidia chinensis × A. arguta population used to map resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) [89]
• Natural diversity panels: Collections of genetically diverse accessions representing natural variation within a species
• Family-based designs: Pedigreed populations with known genetic relationships that facilitate heritability estimation [88]

Sample size requirements vary by species and genetic architecture, but recent studies suggest that hundreds to thousands of individuals are needed for well-powered eQTL detection [86] [90]. For example, the INTERVAL study analyzed 4,732 individuals to identify eQTLs for 17,233 genes [86].

Table 1: Key Considerations for eQTL Study Design in Resistance Research

Design Factor	Options	Considerations for Resistance Studies
Population Type	F2 cross, RILs, NAM, Natural diversity	Controlled crosses reduce confounding; natural diversity captures broader variation
Sample Size	100-5,000+ individuals	Larger samples improve power to detect trans-eQTLs and rare variants
Tissue Selection	Target tissue (e.g., leaves), Time series, Multiple tissues	Pathogen-infected tissues at appropriate timepoints post-inoculation
Replication	Biological, Technical	Essential for distinguishing true genetic effects from noise
Genotyping Density	SNP array, Whole-genome sequencing	Higher density improves resolution for cis-eQTL fine-mapping

Molecular Phenotyping for Expression Analysis

Accurate quantification of gene expression is fundamental to eQTL studies. Several platforms are available, each with distinct advantages for resistance research:

• RNA sequencing (RNA-seq): Provides comprehensive transcriptome coverage, enables discovery of novel transcripts, and allows for simultaneous analysis of splicing QTLs (sQTLs) [86]
• Microarrays: Cost-effective for large sample sizes but limited to predefined transcripts
• NanoString nCounter: Highly reproducible for focused gene sets without amplification bias

For NBS-LRR gene expression analysis, special considerations apply due to the characteristically low expression levels of many resistance genes and their highly similar sequences that can complicate mapping of short reads. The INTERVAL study demonstrated that splicing QTLs (sQTLs) often provide complementary information to eQTLs, with primary cis-sQTL signals enriched within gene bodies compared to secondary signals [86].

Statistical Analysis Workflow

The computational pipeline for eQTL mapping involves multiple sequential steps:

• Genotype quality control: Filtering based on call rate, minor allele frequency (MAF), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and relatedness
• Expression data normalization: Correction for technical artifacts using methods such as quantile normalization (QN) or relative log expression (RLE) normalization [90]
• Covariate adjustment: Including known confounding factors such as batch effects, population structure, and cell-type composition [86]
• Association testing: Typically performed using linear regression with additive genetic models
• Multiple testing correction: Applying false discovery rate (FDR) control to account for the massive number of statistical tests performed

Advanced methods such as multiomic QTL integration—combining eQTLs with chromatin accessibility QTLs (caQTLs) and histone acetylation QTLs (haQTLs)—can significantly enhance the functional interpretation of resistance loci [91].

Comparative Analysis of eQTL Methodologies

Platform Performance and Technical Considerations

Different eQTL mapping approaches offer distinct advantages and limitations for resistance gene studies. The table below compares major methodological frameworks:

Table 2: Comparison of eQTL Mapping Approaches for Resistance Research

Method	Resolution	Key Advantages	Limitations	Sample Throughput
Bulk RNA-seq	Individual genes	Detects novel transcripts, identifies sQTLs, comprehensive view	Cellular heterogeneity confounding, higher cost	Medium (100-1000s)
Single-cell RNA-seq	Single-cell level	Resolves cell-type-specific effects, identifies rare cell populations	High cost, computational complexity, technical noise	Low (10-100s)
Microarray	Predefined transcripts	Cost-effective for large studies, standardized protocols	Limited to annotated genes, background hybridization	High (1000+)
Meta-analysis	Summary statistics	Leverages existing datasets, large cumulative sample sizes	Batch effects, heterogeneous protocols	Very high (10,000+)
Federated (privateQTL)	Individual-level data	Privacy-preserving, multi-center collaboration, reduced batch effects	Computational complexity, implementation barriers	High (1000+ across sites)

Recent methodological advances include federated approaches like privateQTL, which enables secure multi-institutional eQTL mapping without sharing individual-level data [90]. This framework addresses privacy concerns while maintaining analytical accuracy, recovering 91.3-93.2% of eGenes identified by standard approaches compared to 76.1% recovery with traditional meta-analysis [90].

Integration with Other Omics Data Types

Combining eQTL data with other molecular QTL types significantly enhances the functional interpretation of resistance loci:

• Chromatin accessibility QTLs (caQTLs): Identify genetic variants influencing chromatin architecture, often marking regulatory regions [91]
• Histone acetylation QTLs (haQTLs): Pinpoint variants affecting active chromatin marks, particularly valuable for enhancer identification [91]
• Splicing QTLs (sQTLs): Reveal genetic variants influencing alternative splicing patterns, which can generate diverse protein isoforms from single genes [86]
• Protein QTLs (pQTLs): Connect genetic variation to protein abundance, providing closer links to physiological function than transcript levels alone [86]

Integration of multiomic QTLs has been shown to increase GWAS annotation rates by 2.3-fold compared to eQTLs alone, primarily because chromatin QTLs capture distal GWAS loci missed by traditional eQTL approaches [91].

Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools

The Scientist's Toolkit for eQTL Studies

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Resources for eQTL Mapping

Category	Specific Tools/Reagents	Function in eQTL Analysis
RNA Sequencing	Illumina NovaSeq, PacBio Revio, Oxford Nanopore	Transcriptome profiling with varying read lengths and throughput options
Genotyping	Illumina SNP arrays, DDradSeq, Whole-genome sequencing	Genetic variant identification at different densities and resolutions
Library Prep	TruSeq Stranded mRNA, KAPA mRNA HyperPrep	Conversion of RNA to sequence-ready libraries with minimal bias
Quality Control	Bioanalyzer, TapeStation, Qubit, Nanodrop	Assessment of RNA integrity and quantification (RIN >7 recommended)
Computational Tools	STAR, HISAT2 (alignment), FeatureCounts, HTSeq (quantification)	Processing raw sequencing data into gene expression counts
QTL Mapping	Matrix eQTL, FastQTL, QTLtools, privateQTL	Statistical association between genotypes and expression levels
Functional Annotation	ANNOVAR, SnpEff, GATK, GENCODE	Interpretation of variant consequences and regulatory potential

Case Studies in Plant Disease Resistance

Comparative NBS-LRR Gene Analysis Across Plant Species

A comprehensive analysis of NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species identified 12,820 genes with significant diversity in domain architecture patterns [6]. The study revealed both classical (NBS, NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS, TIR-NBS-LRR) and species-specific structural patterns, highlighting the dynamic evolution of resistance genes across plant lineages [6]. Expression profiling identified several orthogroups (OG2, OG6, OG15) with putative upregulation in different tissues under various biotic and abiotic stresses in cotton accessions with contrasting responses to cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) [6].

Functional validation through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton demonstrated its role in reducing virus titers, confirming the value of integrated eQTL and functional approaches for candidate gene prioritization [6]. The genetic variation analysis between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions revealed 6,583 unique variants in Mac7 versus 5,173 in Coker312, providing a rich resource for understanding the genetic basis of resistance [6].

Kiwifruit Bacterial Canker Resistance

In kiwifruit, a high-resolution interspecific linkage map (A. chinensis var. chinensis × A. arguta) was constructed using ddRAD sequencing to identify QTLs for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) [89]. The study identified a major QTL on chromosome 28 and two minor QTLs on chromosomes 4 and 17 linked to resistance in A. arguta, plus a susceptibility-associated QTL on chromosome 9 in A. chinensis [89]. RNA-seq analysis of infected sub-cortical tissues from parental genotypes revealed differentially expressed genes highlighting candidates potentially involved in resistance and susceptibility mechanisms [89].

This integrated QTL and transcriptome approach exemplifies how eQTL analysis can narrow candidate genes within QTL intervals, which often span hundreds of genes. The combination of genetic mapping with functional genomics data accelerated the identification of putative causal genes for downstream validation and marker-assisted breeding [89].

Data Interpretation and Translation

Colocalization Analysis for Candidate Gene Prioritization

Statistical colocalization tests determine whether GWAS signals for disease resistance and eQTLs for specific genes share the same underlying causal variant [86]. This approach has successfully linked regulatory variants to molecular mechanisms in several resistance contexts:

• In European sea bass, colocalization analysis connected a major VNN resistance QTL with altered expression of interferon-responsive genes (IFI27L2 and IFI27L2A) [88]
• The INTERVAL study identified 3,979 genes with colocalized eQTL and sQTL signals, revealing complex transcriptional regulation at disease-relevant loci [86]
• Multiomic QTL integration colocalized 540 GWAS loci with QTLs across 15 traits, with 5.4% (n=13) of colocalized eQTLs showing early developmental specificity [91]

Mediation Analysis for Mechanism Elucidation

Mediation analysis quantifies the proportion of the total genetic effect on a resistance phenotype that operates through specific molecular intermediaries such as gene expression or splicing [86]. This approach has revealed that:

• 222 molecular phenotypes were significantly mediated by gene expression or splicing in the INTERVAL study [86]
• Regulatory mechanisms at disease loci can have therapeutic implications, as demonstrated for WARS1 in hypertension, IL7R in dermatitis, and IFNAR2 in COVID-19 [86]
• Primary cis-sQTL signals are enriched within gene bodies compared to secondary signals, suggesting distinct mechanisms influencing splicing versus expression [86]

Future Directions and Translational Applications

While eQTL studies have generated substantial insights into the genetic architecture of disease resistance, several challenges remain. The "colocalization gap" – wherein only ~43% of GWAS loci colocalize with eQTLs from adult tissues – highlights the importance of context-specific regulatory effects [91]. Future studies should prioritize:

• Temporal dynamics: Sampling across developmental stages and infection timecourses
• Spatial resolution: Employing single-cell approaches to resolve cell-type-specific regulatory effects
• Multi-omic integration: Combining eQTLs with other molecular QTL types for comprehensive functional annotation
• Cross-species conservation: Leveraging comparative genomics to distinguish species-specific from conserved regulatory mechanisms

Translation of eQTL discoveries into practical applications requires validation through functional studies and integration into breeding programs. Methods such as virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) [6], CRISPR-based genome editing, and transgenic complementation can confirm causal relationships between regulatory variants, gene expression, and resistance phenotypes. For breeding applications, diagnostic markers can be developed for marker-assisted selection, enabling precision breeding of resistant cultivars without the need for extensive phenotypic screening.

The continuing evolution of eQTL methodologies—including privacy-preserving federated analysis [90], multi-omic integration [91], and advanced computational frameworks—promises to deepen our understanding of the genetic basis of disease resistance and accelerate the development of durable resistance in crop species and beyond.

The evolution of Nucleotide-Binding Site-Leucine Rich Repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, the largest class of plant disease resistance (R) genes, is characterized by complex diversification patterns driven by gene duplication and loss events [6]. Understanding these patterns requires robust methodologies for identifying orthologous gene relationships across species. Synteny analysis, the identification of conserved gene order in genomic sequences, provides a powerful framework for tracing the evolutionary history of NBS genes beyond simple sequence similarity [92]. This guide objectively compares the performance of a novel synteny analysis method against traditional approaches within the context of a large-scale comparative analysis of NBS genes across 34 plant species [6].

Performance Comparison: SOI Versus Traditional Synteny Methods

The Synteny Orthology Identification (SOI) method, based on the Orthology Index (OI), represents a recent advancement for robust identification of orthologous synteny [92]. Table 1 compares its performance against traditional methods commonly used in evolutionary genomics.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Synteny Analysis Methods for NBS Gene Evolution

Feature/Metric	SOI (Orthology Index) Method	Traditional Synteny Methods
Handling of Polyploidy	High reliability and robustness across diverse polyploidization events [92]	Great limitations in scaling with varied polyploidy histories [92]
Out-paralog Filtering	Accurate removal of out-paralogous synteny [92]	Less effective at distinguishing true orthologs from paralogs
Benchmark Accuracy	Superior performance across a wide range of scenarios in simulation-based benchmarks [92]	Variable and often lower accuracy in complex evolutionary scenarios
Scalability	Scalable approach suitable for large-scale empirical datasets [92]	May struggle with computational demands of whole-genome datasets
Application in NBS Studies	Directly facilitates reconstruction of evolutionary history, including inference of polyploidy and identification of reticulation [92]	Relies on indirect inference, potentially introducing error in tracing NBS gene lineages

The primary advantage of the OI-based method lies in its specific design to address two major limitations of previous approaches: scaling with varied polyploidy histories and accurately removing out-paralogous synteny [92]. This is particularly relevant for tracing NBS gene evolution, as these genes are often organized in rapidly evolving tandem arrays [6] [93].

Experimental Protocols for Key Analyses

Protocol 1: Genome-Wide Identification and Classification of NBS Genes

The foundational step for comparative analysis is the consistent identification of NBS-encoding genes across species. The following protocol is adapted from large-scale comparative studies [6] [7] [93].

• Data Collection: Obtain the latest genome assemblies and annotation files for all target species from databases such as NCBI, Phytozome, or Plaza [6].
• Domain Identification: Use HMMER with the NB-ARC domain (Pfam: PF00931) Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to screen proteomes. An e-value cutoff of < 1.0 or stricter (e.g., 1.1e-50) is recommended to identify candidate NBS-domain-containing genes [6] [7].
• Architecture Classification: Identify associated N-terminal and C-terminal domains using HMM searches and other prediction tools:
  • LRR Domains: Search against PF00560, PF07723, PF12799, among others [7].
  • TIR Domain: Search against PF01582 [7].
  • CC Domain: Predict using the COILS program with a threshold of 0.1 [7].
  • RPW8 Domain: Search against PF05659 [7].
• Validation: Confirm the presence of all domains using CD-search (NCBI) and SMART tools to improve prediction accuracy [7].

Protocol 2: Identification of Orthologous Synteny Blocks and Orthogroups

To trace the evolutionary relationships of NBS genes across species, orthology must be established.

• Orthogroup Inference: Use OrthoFinder with the DIAMOND tool for sequence similarity searches and the MCL algorithm for clustering. This groups NBS sequences into orthogroups (OGs)—sets of genes descended from a single gene in the last common ancestor of all species considered [6].
• Synteny Block Identification: For a more robust analysis, employ the SOI method [92]. This involves:
  • Calculating the Orthology Index (OI) to effectively identify orthologous syntenic regions.
  • Using the OI to distinguish true orthologous synteny from out-paralogous synteny, which is crucial in complex NBS gene families.
• Phylogenetic Reconciliation: Compare the resulting gene trees with the known species tree using software like Notung to infer duplication and loss events that occurred during the evolution of the NBS gene family [7].

Protocol 3: Evolutionary and Selection Pressure Analysis

Understanding the selective forces acting on NBS genes provides insight into their functional diversification.

• Identification of Gene Duplications: Use MCScanX to identify orthologous and paralogous gene pairs, categorizing duplications as either tandem (genes located within 200-250 kb of each other) or segmental (whole-genome duplication) [6] [7] [93].
• Calculation of Selection Pressure: For duplicated NBS gene pairs, calculate the ratio of non-synonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) substitutions.
  • Ka/Ks > 1 indicates positive selection.
  • Ka/Ks ≈ 1 indicates neutral evolution.
  • Ka/Ks < 1 indicates purifying selection [7].
• Expression Profiling: Utilize RNA-seq data (e.g., FPKM values) from databases to profile the expression of specific NBS orthogroups across different tissues and under biotic/abiotic stresses [6].

The workflow for the entire comparative analysis, from data preparation to evolutionary inference, is visualized below.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2 details essential bioinformatic tools and datasets used in the featured large-scale comparative analysis of NBS genes [6].

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Resources for Comparative NBS Genomics

Resource/Reagent	Type	Primary Function in Analysis
Pfam NB-ARC HMM (PF00931)	Hidden Markov Model	Serves as a core query for identifying the conserved NBS domain in protein sequences [6] [93].
OrthoFinder v2.5.1	Software Package	Infers orthogroups and gene families from whole-genome sequence data [6].
MAFFT v7	Software Algorithm	Performs multiple sequence alignment of identified NBS genes for phylogenetic analysis [6] [7].
IQ-TREE v1.6.12	Software Algorithm	Constructs maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees with branch support values [7].
MCScanX	Software Algorithm	Identifies syntenic genomic regions and classifies types of gene duplication [6] [7].
SOI Method	Analytical Algorithm	Robust identification of orthologous synteny blocks, overcoming polyploidy challenges [92].
Plant Genome Databases (e.g., GDR, Phytozome)	Data Repository	Sources for curated genome sequences and annotations across multiple plant species [6] [7].
RNA-seq Databases (e.g., IPF, CottonFGD)	Data Repository	Provides expression data (FPKM) for profiling NBS gene expression under various conditions [6].

Functional Validation and Evolutionary Inference

The ultimate goal of comparative synteny analysis is to generate testable hypotheses about gene function and evolutionary history. The workflow for translating synteny data into biological insight is shown below.

This integrated approach has revealed distinct evolutionary patterns for NBS genes. For instance, analyses in Sapindaceae species showed dynamic patterns of "expansion and contraction" linked to lineage-specific gene duplication and loss events [93]. Similarly, in diploid wild strawberries, non-TNL genes were found to be under stronger positive selection and exhibited higher expression levels compared to TNLs, suggesting a significant role in pathogen defense [7]. Functional validation, such as silencing the GaNBS gene (a member of OG2) via Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) in resistant cotton, confirmed its role in reducing virus titer, demonstrating the utility of this workflow in moving from genomic comparison to functional insight [6].

Conclusion

This comprehensive analysis across 34 plant species establishes that NBS disease resistance genes represent a dynamically evolving, highly diverse gene family. Their expansion and contraction are driven by distinct evolutionary pressures, resulting in a complex repertoire of both conserved and lineage-specific genes. The functional validation of key orthogroups, such as OG2 in cotton leaf curl disease resistance, underscores the direct link between NBS genetic variation and disease tolerance. For biomedical and clinical research, these findings pave the way for leveraging plant immune receptor knowledge. Future directions should focus on the translational potential of these genetic mechanisms, including the engineering of synthetic NBS genes for broad-spectrum resistance and the application of evolutionary principles to understand nucleotide-binding domain proteins in human innate immunity. The methodologies and genomic resources outlined here provide a robust framework for accelerating the discovery and deployment of R genes in crop protection and biomedicine.

References

• 1. Plant NBS-LRR proteins: adaptable guards - Genome Biology [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-212]
• 2. Plant disease resistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15231261/]
• 3. Identification and expression profiling analysis of NBS ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500516/]
• 4. Genome-wide characterization of nitric oxide-induced NBS ... [https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-024-05587-3]
• 5. Evolution patterns of NBS genes in the genus Dendrobium ... [https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-022-03904-2]
• 6. Comparative analysis, diversification, and functional ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-62876-5]
• 7. Evolutionary analysis of TIR- and non-TIR-NBS-LRR ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1452251/full]
• 8. Functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes reveals an ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898138/]
• 9. Genome-Wide Identification of NBS-LRR Family in Three ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12192410/]
• 10. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Pattern ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/18/9063]
• 11. Genome-wide analysis of NBS-LRR genes in Rosaceae ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.1052191/full]
• 12. Comparative genomics and bioinformatics approaches ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2024.1358134/full]
• 13. Comparative analysis of NBS domain sequences ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790303002744]
• 14. Genome-wide identification and prediction of disease ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798124000255]
• 15. Comparative analysis, diversification, and functional ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11126693/]
• 16. Models for the retention of duplicate genes and their ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10762295/]
• 17. Evolution patterns of NBS genes in the genus Dendrobium ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9661794/]
• 18. Identification and distribution of the NBS-LRR gene family in ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-015-1554-9]
• 19. Comparative analysis of the NLR gene family in ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1681919/full]
• 20. Identification and Characterization of NBS Resistance ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.758559/full]
• 21. Numbers of genes in the NBS and RLK families vary by ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2965241/]
• 22. Genome-wide comparative analysis of NBS-encoding genes ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4008172/]
• 23. Extreme expansion of NBS-encoding genes in Rosaceae [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4417205/]
• 24. Tandem and segmental gene duplication and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168952504000228]
• 25. Phylogenetic, Structural, and Evolutionary Insights into ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/5/1828]
• 26. Identification, characterization, and validation of NBS ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10318170/]
• 27. Identification and distribution of the NBS-LRR gene family in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4422547/]
• 28. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6857279/]
• 29. Benchmarking Orthogroup Inference Accuracy [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7738749/]
• 30. Comparative gene retention analysis in barley, wild emmer ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9903521/]
• 31. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative ... [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y]
• 32. OrthoBrowser: gene family analysis and visualization - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11825985/]
• 33. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies NBS-LRR ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.01398/full]
• 34. Phylogenetic, Structural, and Evolutionary Insights into ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11899730/]
• 35. Table 6 Visualization tools for comparative genomics [https://gigascience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13742-015-0077-2/tables/6]
• 36. Network-based clustering unveils interconnected ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59374-1]
• 37. Integrating genetic and gene expression data in network ... [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-025-06143-y]
• 38. Improving newborn screening accuracy through genome ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12628566/]
• 39. The Cassava NBS-LRR Genes Confer Resistance to ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.790140/full]
• 40. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Pattern ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12469828/]
• 41. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the nucleotide ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9434374/]
• 42. Genome-Wide Identification of NBS-LRR Family in Three ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/16/6/680]
• 43. Response of NBS encoding resistance genes linked to ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0981942814003428]
• 44. Comparative Genomics and Functional Genomics Analysis ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10095511/]
• 45. Public RNA-Seq and scRNA-Seq Databases [https://bigomics.ch/blog/ultimate-guide-to-public-rnaseq-and-sc-rna-seq-databases/]
• 46. Gene Expression Omnibus - NCBI - NIH [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/]
• 47. RNA-Seq data repositories [https://biocorecrg.github.io/PHINDaccess_RNAseq_2020/repositories.html]
• 48. PlantTribes2: Tools for comparative gene family analysis in ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1011199/full]
• 49. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the nucleotide ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.960723/full]
• 50. Genome-wide comparative analysis of NBS-encoding genes ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-15-3]
• 51. The Diversification of Plant NBS-LRR Defense Genes ... - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5026261/]
• 52. Functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes reveals an ... [https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-024-01836-x]
• 53. Complex genetic variation in nearly complete human ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09140-6]
• 54. Structure and function analysis of a CC-NBS-LRR protein ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33272575/]
• 55. Plant NBS-LRR proteins in pathogen sensing and host defense [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1973153/]
• 56. Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Evolution of NLR ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12562843/]
• 57. An N-terminal motif in NLR immune receptors is functionally ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6944444/]
• 58. Structure and function analysis of a CC-NBS-LRR protein ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X20321550]
• 59. Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants - PMC - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4972278/]
• 60. ITD assembler: an algorithm for internal tandem duplication ... [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-016-1031-8]
• 61. Fast characterization of segmental duplications in genome ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6129265/]
• 62. Targeted Informatics for Optimal Detection, Characterization ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7479488/]
• 63. Modelling segmental duplications in the human genome [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-021-07789-7]
• 64. Identification and Characterization of NBS Resistance ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8585750/]
• 65. Discovery of functional NLRs using expression level, high- ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-025-02110-w]
• 66. Comparative genomics profiling revealed multi-stress ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10642748/]
• 67. The microRNA miR482 regulates NBS-LRR genes in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168945224001055]
• 68. Identification, characterization, and validation of NBS ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1187597/full]
• 69. Genome-Wide Analysis of the NBS-LRR Gene Family and ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/10/12/1293]
• 70. Comparative analysis, diversification, and functional ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38789717/]
• 71. Genome-wide comparative analysis of NBS-encoding genes ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-017-3682-x]
• 72. Systematic Analysis and Comparison of Nucleotide-Binding ... [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068435]
• 73. Validated KASP Markers for drought tolerance in cotton ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X25001666]
• 74. Development and identification of molecular markers ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37196889/]
• 75. Comparative proteomic analysis of resistant and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874391924001908]
• 76. Interaction between domains of a plant NBS–LRR protein in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC126192/]
• 77. Resistance genes on the verge of plant–virus interaction [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1360138522001832]
• 78. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) for Functional ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30460561/]
• 79. Virus-induced gene silencing of Xa38 compromises the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0885576520302514]
• 80. An Efficient Rice Virus-Induced Gene Silencing System ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/5818]
• 81. Plant NBS-LRR proteins: adaptable guards - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1557992/]
• 82. Isolation of PCSK9-specific nanobodies from synthetic ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-88032-1]
• 83. Organization and molecular evolution of a disease-resistance ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-12-240]
• 84. NBS-Encoding Genes in Brassica napus Evolved Rapidly ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6363714/]
• 85. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the nucleotide ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36061812/]
• 86. The contribution of genetic determinants of blood gene ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-025-02096-3]
• 87. Twenty years of genome-wide association studies: Health ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-025-01951-5]
• 88. Integrated functional genomic analysis identifies regulatory ... [https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-025-02180-4]
• 89. QTL mapping for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12522971/]
• 90. Overcoming collaboration barriers in quantitative trait loci ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872532/]
• 91. Multiomic QTL mapping reveals phenotypic complexity of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960542/]
• 92. SOI: robust identification of orthologous synteny with the ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40248914]
• 93. Distinct Evolutionary Patterns of NBS-Encoding Genes in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7365912/]