FRET Nanosensors for Plant Hormone Detection: Fabrication, Applications, and Future Clinical Translation

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive exploration of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors, a transformative technology for the real-time, non-destructive monitoring of plant hormones. We detail the foundational principles of FRET and the strategic design of nanosensors, including the selection of biorecognition elements and nanomaterial interfaces. The content covers advanced fabrication methodologies, from genetically encoded sensors to exogenous probes, and their application in live plant imaging and stress response studies. A critical analysis of performance optimization, troubleshooting common challenges, and comparative validation against traditional techniques is presented. Finally, we discuss the future trajectory of this technology, highlighting its potential implications for biomedical research, including drug discovery and novel diagnostic platforms, aiming to equip researchers and scientists with the knowledge to advance this cutting-edge field.

Unlocking Plant Communication: The Science Behind FRET Nanosensors

Core Principles of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is a powerful mechanism describing energy transfer between two light-sensitive molecules (chromophores) [1]. This phenomenon, proposed by Theodor Förster in 1946 and confirmed experimentally by Stryer & Haugland in 1967, serves as a "spectroscopic ruler" that can measure molecular distances in the 1-10 nanometer range [2]. In FRET, a donor chromophore in its excited state transfers energy to an acceptor chromophore through nonradiative dipole-dipole coupling [1]. The exceptional sensitivity of FRET to minute distance changes has made it an indispensable tool in biophysics, biochemistry, and molecular biology for studying protein-protein interactions, protein conformational changes, nucleic acid dynamics, and receptor/ligand interactions [3] [1]. This note details the core principles, measurement techniques, and practical applications of FRET, with particular emphasis on its implementation in nanosensor fabrication for plant hormone detection research.

Theoretical Foundations & Physical Principles

The efficiency of FRET is governed by a precise set of physical parameters and mathematical relationships that underlie its function as a distance-measurement tool.

Fundamental Requirements for FRET

Three primary conditions must be satisfied for FRET to occur effectively [3] [2]:

• Spectral Overlap: The fluorescence emission spectrum of the donor must significantly overlap with the absorption spectrum of the acceptor. This overlap integral (J) is a critical factor in determining the efficiency of energy transfer.
• Close Proximity: The donor and acceptor molecules must be in close proximity, typically within 1-10 nanometers. The strong distance dependence makes FRET sensitive to molecular-scale separations.
• Favorable Orientation: The transition dipole moments of the donor and acceptor must be approximately parallel. The relative orientation is quantified by the orientation factor (κ²), which can range from 0 (perpendicular) to 4 (collinear parallel).

The Förster Equation and Key Parameters

The FRET efficiency (E) defines the fraction of excited donors that transfer energy to acceptors and is given by the core equation:

E = 1 / [1 + (r/R₀)⁶] [1]

Where:

• r is the actual distance between the donor and acceptor.
• R₀ is the Förster radius, defined as the distance at which energy transfer is 50% efficient.

The characteristic inverse sixth-power distance dependence makes FRET exceptionally sensitive to small changes in molecular separation. The Förster radius (R₀) is specific to each donor-acceptor pair and is calculated as follows:

R₀⁶ = 8.785 × 10⁻⁵ × (κ² Qᴅ J) / n⁴ [1]

Where:

• κ² is the orientation factor (often assumed to be 2/3 for dynamic random averaging).
• Qᴅ is the fluorescence quantum yield of the donor in the absence of the acceptor.
• J is the spectral overlap integral between donor emission and acceptor absorption.
• n is the refractive index of the medium.

Table 1: Förster Radii (R₀) for Common Donor-Acceptor Pairs

Donor	Acceptor	Förster Radius (R₀) in Ångströms (Å)
Fluorescein	Tetramethylrhodamine	55 [3]
IAEDANS	Fluorescein	46 [3]
EDANS	Dabcyl	33 [3]
BODIPY FL	BODIPY FL	57 [3]
Fluorescein	QSY 7	61 [3]

The following diagram illustrates the relationship between FRET efficiency and the separation distance relative to the Förster radius, which is the core principle enabling its use as a spectroscopic ruler.

Experimental Measurement of FRET Efficiency

Several well-established methodologies exist for quantifying FRET efficiency, each with distinct advantages and implementation requirements.

Sensitized Emission (Acceptor Emission Monitoring)

This method measures the increase in acceptor fluorescence resulting from FRET.

Protocol:

• Labeling: Introduce donor and acceptor fluorophores onto the target molecules (e.g., proteins, DNA).
• Excitation: Illuminate the sample at a wavelength that preferentially excites the donor molecule.
• Detection: Monitor the emission intensity at the acceptor's characteristic fluorescence wavelength.
• Control Measurement: Perform a control experiment with donor-alone to quantify background signal and direct acceptor excitation.
• Calculation: The FRET efficiency can be calculated from the sensitized acceptor emission, after correcting for spectral bleed-through and direct excitation, using the formula: E = 1 - (Fᴅ′/Fᴅ), where Fᴅ′ and Fᴅ are the donor fluorescence intensities in the presence and absence of the acceptor, respectively [1].

Donor Photobleaching FRET

This technique infers FRET efficiency from the change in the donor's photobleaching rate.

Protocol:

• Sample Preparation: Prepare two identical samples: one with donor-only and another with the donor-acceptor pair.
• Continuous Illumination: Expose both samples to continuous illumination at the donor excitation wavelength.
• Fluorescence Decay Monitoring: Record the decay of donor fluorescence intensity over time as photobleaching occurs.
• Curve Fitting: Fit the fluorescence decay curves to a single exponential to extract the photobleaching time constant (τpb for donor-only; τpb′ for donor with acceptor).
• Efficiency Calculation: Calculate FRET efficiency using: E = 1 - (τpb / τpb′) [1]. A shorter bleaching time in the presence of the acceptor indicates active FRET.

Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM)

FLIM measures the change in the donor's fluorescence lifetime, which is a more robust parameter as it is independent of fluorophore concentration.

Protocol:

• Lifetime Measurement: Use a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) system or a frequency-domain FLIM setup to measure the fluorescence lifetime of the donor (τ_D) in the absence of the acceptor.
• Sample Measurement: Measure the donor fluorescence lifetime (τ_D′) in the presence of the acceptor.
• Efficiency Calculation: Determine FRET efficiency directly from the lifetime reduction: E = 1 - (τD′ / τD) [1]. This method is highly quantitative and avoids many artifacts associated with intensity-based measurements.

Table 2: Comparison of Key FRET Measurement Methodologies

Method	Principle	Key Advantage	Key Limitation
Sensitized Emission	Measures increased acceptor fluorescence	Technically straightforward, widely applicable	Requires careful correction for spectral bleed-through
Donor Photobleaching	Measures change in donor bleaching rate	Can be performed on standard fluorescence microscopes	Destructive; not suitable for live-cell kinetics
FLIM	Measures change in donor fluorescence lifetime	Insensitive to fluorophore concentration; highly quantitative	Requires sophisticated, expensive instrumentation

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Successful FRET experimentation requires careful selection of fluorophores, instrumentation, and auxiliary reagents.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for FRET Experiments

Item / Category	Specific Examples	Function / Application Note
Donor-Acceptor Pairs	CFP-YFP; Fluorescein-Tetramethylrhodamine; Alexa Fluor dyes; QSY quenchers [3] [2]	CFP-YFP is a genetically-encodable pair ideal for live-cell imaging. Organic dyes often provide higher brightness and photostability. QSY dyes are non-fluorescent acceptors ("quenchers") that eliminate background from direct acceptor fluorescence.
Non-fluorescent Quenchers	Dabcyl, QSY 7, QSY 9 [3]	Used in molecular beacons and protease substrates. Efficiently quench donor fluorescence via FRET without emitting light, simplifying signal interpretation.
Protease Substrates	EDANS/Dabcyl labeled peptides (e.g., H2930 for HIV protease) [3]	The peptide linker is cleaved by specific proteases, separating donor (EDANS) and acceptor (Dabcyl), thereby eliminating FRET and increasing donor fluorescence.
Instrumentation	High-sensitivity sCMOS cameras; FLIM systems; Confocal laser scanning microscopes [2]	sCMOS cameras offer high speed and sensitivity crucial for capturing fast FRET dynamics. FLIM systems provide quantitative lifetime data.
Nanoparticle Donors/Acceptors	Quantum Dots (QDs), Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) [4]	QDs are photostable donors with tunable emission. AuNPs are efficient acceptors/quenchers. Both can be used to enhance FRET sensor performance.

FRET-Based Nanosensors for Plant Hormone Detection

The application of FRET in fabricating nanosensors represents a cutting-edge approach for detecting plant hormones, enabling real-time monitoring of signaling dynamics in live plants.

Basic Nanosensor Design Principle

A typical FRET-based nanosensor for plant hormone detection consists of:

• A specific hormone-binding protein (e.g., a receptor or antibody).
• Two fluorophores (a donor and an acceptor) attached to the binding protein.
• A nanoscale delivery system or surface immobilization chemistry.

The schematic below illustrates the working principle of a conjugate FRET nanosensor for plant hormone detection, where hormone binding induces a conformational change in the sensor, altering the distance between the attached fluorophores.

Advanced Configurations: Quantum Dot-Based FRET Sensors

Quantum Dots (QDs) are particularly valuable as FRET donors in nanosensors due to their high brightness, photostability, and tunable emission [4]. A QD-FRET biosensor can be constructed by conjugating a hormone-binding protein to the QD surface and attaching an organic dye acceptor. Hormone binding-induced conformational changes alter the FRET efficiency, providing a highly sensitive and stable readout. Similar principles have been successfully applied to detect plant pathogens like Citrus tristeza virus and Ganoderma boninense [4], demonstrating the viability of this technology for agricultural diagnostics.

Protocol: Fabrication and Testing of a Conjugate FRET Nanosensor

Objective: To create a FRET-based nanosensor for detecting a specific plant hormone (e.g., auxin or jasmonic acid).

Materials:

• Purified hormone-binding protein/receptor.
• Donor and acceptor fluorophores with compatible R₀ (e.g., Cy3/Cy5).
• Functionalized nanoparticles (e.g., QDs, AuNPs) if applicable.
• Purification columns (e.g., size-exclusion chromatography).
• Buffer solutions (PBS, etc.).
• Spectrofluorometer or confocal microscope with FRET capability.
• Target plant hormone (analyte) in pure form.

Procedure:

• Labeling:
  • Conjugate the donor fluorophore to one site on the hormone-binding protein and the acceptor fluorophore to another site. This can be achieved using amine-reactive (NHS ester), thiol-reactive (maleimide), or click chemistry, depending on the available functional groups on the protein.
  • Perform the labeling reactions in appropriate buffers, protecting from light.
  • Purify the dual-labeled protein from free dyes using size-exclusion chromatography or dialysis.

• In Vitro Characterization:

  • Dilute the purified FRET sensor to a working concentration in a suitable buffer.
  • Place the sample in a cuvette and measure the emission spectrum upon donor excitation in the absence of the hormone.
  • Add increasing concentrations of the target hormone to the cuvette, incubate to allow binding, and record the emission spectrum after each addition.
  • Calculate FRET efficiency (E) for each hormone concentration using the donor quenching method: E = 1 - (IDA / ID), where IDA is donor intensity with acceptor present, and ID is the donor intensity in a donor-only control (requires a separate sample).

• Data Analysis:

  • Plot FRET efficiency (E) or the ratio of acceptor/donor emission (sensitized emission) against hormone concentration.
  • Fit the dose-response curve to a binding model (e.g., Langmuir isotherm) to determine the dissociation constant (K_d) and dynamic range of the sensor.

Troubleshooting and Technical Considerations

• Low FRET Signal: Verify spectral overlap is sufficient. Check labeling efficiency to ensure both fluorophores are present. Confirm that the donor and acceptor are within the functional distance range (< 10 nm).
• High Background Fluorescence: Optimize purification to remove unbound dyes. Use non-fluorescent quenchers (e.g., QSY, Dabcyl) as acceptors to minimize background [3].
• Artifacts in Live-Cell Imaging: For plant studies, consider sensor delivery methods (e.g., biolistic, transfection, protoplast transformation). Autofluorescence from plant cell walls and chloroplasts can interfere; choose fluorophores with emission in optical windows minimizing plant autofluorescence.
• Orientation Factor (κ²) Uncertainty: If the system is structurally well-defined, κ² can be modeled. For flexible linkers, the assumption of κ² = 2/3 (dynamic random averaging) is often valid, but deviations can affect the absolute distance measurement [1].

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors represent a transformative class of analytical tools that enable the real-time, non-invasive monitoring of biochemical analytes, including plant hormones, within living systems [5]. These sensors function as molecular scales that undergo conformational changes upon analyte binding, which is transduced into a measurable fluorescent signal [6]. The significance of these tools is particularly pronounced in plant biology, where they allow for the visualization of hormone dynamics—such as those of abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), and juvenile hormone (JH)—with high spatiotemporal resolution, overcoming the destructive limitations of traditional methods like liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [7] [8] [9]. The exquisite sensitivity and specificity of FRET nanosensors are derived from the precise integration of three core components: a bioreceptor for molecular recognition, paired fluorophores for signal generation, and a transducer that converts the molecular event into a quantifiable optical readout [10] [5]. This application note delineates the fundamental principles, constituent parts, and detailed protocols for the fabrication and application of FRET nanosensors, framed within the context of advanced plant hormone research.

Key Principles and Components of a FRET Nanosensor

FRET is a distance-dependent physical process wherein energy is transferred non-radiatively from an excited donor fluorophore to an acceptor fluorophore through dipole-dipole coupling [5]. The efficiency of this energy transfer is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the distance between the two fluorophores, making FRET exquisitely sensitive to nanometer-scale changes in displacement [5] [6]. In a typical FRET-based nanosensor, a ligand-binding protein (bioreceptor) is flanked by a donor-acceptor fluorescent protein pair. Upon binding of the target analyte, the bioreceptor undergoes a conformational change that alters the distance and/or orientation between the two fluorophores, thereby modulating the FRET efficiency [7] [11]. This change is measured ratiometrically, which provides an internal calibration, making the measurement robust against variations in sensor concentration, excitation intensity, and photobleaching [7] [8].

The table below summarizes the core components and their functions:

Table 1: Core Components of a Genetically Encoded FRET Nanosensor

Component	Function	Key Characteristics	Examples
Bioreceptor	Recognizes and binds the target analyte with high specificity.	High affinity for the analyte; undergoes a conformational change upon binding.	Juvenile Hormone-Binding Protein (JHBP) [7], Abscisic Acid Receptors (PYR1) [6], Sialic Acid Binding Protein (SiaP) [11].
Donor Fluorophore	Absorbs excitation light and, if close enough, transfers energy to the acceptor.	High quantum yield; emission spectrum must overlap with acceptor's absorption.	mTFP1 [7], ECFP [11], Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) [6].
Acceptor Fluorophore	Receives energy from the donor and emits light at its characteristic wavelength.	High absorption at the donor's emission wavelength; high quantum yield.	mVenus [7], Venus [11], Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) [6].
Transducer	The integrated system that converts the bioreceptor's conformational change into a change in FRET signal.	The physical linkage and structural relationship between the bioreceptor and fluorophores.	The entire fusion protein construct where the binding-induced hinge motion alters the distance between donor and acceptor [7] [6].

The following diagram illustrates the fundamental working principle of a FRET nanosensor, from analyte binding to the ratiometric readout.

Detailed Experimental Protocol: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization of a FRET Nanosensor

The following protocol outlines the key steps for generating a FRET-based nanosensor, from initial molecular construction to in vitro validation, using the juvenile hormone sensor FREJIA and the sialic acid sensor FLIP-SA as representative examples [7] [11].

Sensor Design and Molecular Cloning

Objective: To clone the gene encoding the nanosensor into an appropriate expression vector.

Materials:

• Template DNA: cDNA encoding the chosen bioreceptor (e.g., Bombyx mori JHBP II or H. influenzae SiaP).
• FRET Pair Genes: Plasmids containing the genes for mTFP1 (donor) and mVenus (acceptor), or ECFP and Venus.
• Expression Vector: Bacterial expression vector such as pRSET-A or pRSET-B [7] [11].
• Enzymes: High-fidelity DNA polymerase (e.g., PrimeSTAR HS), restriction endonucleases (e.g., XhoI, EcoRV, KpnI), and seamless cloning enzyme mix.
• Host Cells: Cloning-grade E. coli (e.g., DH5α).

Procedure:

• Amplify Bioreceptor Gene: Design primers to amplify the mature coding sequence of the bioreceptor, excluding its native signal peptide. Introduce appropriate restriction sites (e.g., EcoRV) or overlapping homology regions for seamless cloning at the 5' and 3' ends.
• Assemble Sensor Construct: Ligate the amplified bioreceptor gene into the expression vector between the genes encoding the donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins. This creates a single open reading frame for the fusion protein: Donor-Bioreceptor-Acceptor [7] [11].
• Generate Variants (if needed): Use site-directed mutagenesis to create a library of sensor variants. This is often crucial for optimizing the sensor's dynamic range. For FREJIA, this involved inserting the donor fluorophore (mTFP1) at different positions within the JHBP scaffold rather than at the termini [7].
• Validate Construct: Transform the ligation product into competent E. coli cells. Select positive clones, isolate plasmid DNA, and verify the final construct by restriction digestion and Sanger sequencing.

Protein Expression and Purification

Objective: To express the recombinant sensor protein in a bacterial host and purify it to homogeneity.

Materials:

• Expression Host: E. coli BL21(DE3) expression strain.
• Growth Medium: LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL).
• Inducer: Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).
• Lysis Buffer: Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.5.
• Purification Columns: Ni–NTA affinity column (e.g., HisTrap HP) and size-exclusion chromatography column (e.g., HiLoad Superdex 200) [7].

Procedure:

• Transformation and Culture: Transform the validated expression vector into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells. Inoculate a single colony into LB/ampicillin medium and grow at 37°C with shaking until the OD~600~ reaches ~0.6.
• Protein Induction: Add IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 - 1.0 mM. Reduce the temperature to 16°C and incubate with shaking for 16 hours in the dark to minimize photobleaching [7] [11].
• Cell Harvest and Lysis: Pellet the cells by centrifugation. Resuspend the pellet in ice-cold lysis buffer and lyse the cells using ultrasonication on ice. Clarify the lysate by centrifugation to remove cell debris.
• Affinity Purification: Apply the supernatant to a Ni–NTA affinity column. Wash the column with a buffer containing 20-50 mM imidazole to remove weakly bound proteins. Elute the His-tagged sensor protein using an elution buffer containing 400 mM imidazole.
• Buffer Exchange and Further Purification: Desalt the eluted protein into an appropriate storage buffer (e.g., 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5). For further purification, perform size-exclusion chromatography. Assess the purity of the final protein preparation by SDS-PAGE.

In Vitro Fluorometric Assay for Sensor Characterization

Objective: To determine the affinity, specificity, and dynamic range of the purified nanosensor.

Materials:

• Purified Sensor Protein: As obtained from Section 3.2.
• Analytes: Pure compounds of the target hormone (e.g., JH I, II, III) and potential analogs or interfering substances (e.g., methoprene, pyriproxyfen, oleic acid) [7]. Prepare stock solutions in 100% ethanol.
• Microplate: 96-well clear-bottom polystyrene microplate.
• Instrumentation: Fluorescence spectrophotometer or a fluorescence microplate reader capable of ratiometric measurements (e.g., PerkinElmer ARVO MX) [7].

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Dilute the purified sensor protein to a concentration of 2–5 µM in assay buffer (e.g., 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl). Dispense the sensor solution into the microplate wells.
• Titration Experiment: Add increasing concentrations of the target analyte (e.g., JH III) to the wells. Include control wells with solvent (ethanol) only. Allow the reaction to equilibrate.
• Fluorescence Measurement: For each well, acquire the fluorescence spectra or take readings at specific wavelengths:
  • Donor channel: Excitation = 450 nm, Emission = 480 nm (for mTFP1/ECFP).
  • Acceptor channel: Excitation = 500 nm, Emission = 530 nm (for mVenus/Venus).
  • FRET channel: Excitation = 450 nm, Emission = 530 nm.
• Data Analysis: Calculate the emission ratio for each data point as the intensity at the acceptor emission wavelength (530 nm) divided by the intensity at the donor emission wavelength (480 nm) upon donor excitation [7]. Plot the ratio against the analyte concentration and fit the data with a non-linear regression (e.g., sigmoidal dose-response curve) to determine the apparent dissociation constant (K~d~).
• Specificity Test: Repeat the assay with a fixed, near-saturating concentration of different structural analogs to evaluate cross-reactivity.

Table 2: Exemplary Performance Metrics of FRET Nanosensors for Various Analytes

Sensor Name	Target Analyte	Bioreceptor	FRET Pair	Affinity (K~d~) / Dynamic Range	Key Application
FREJIA [7]	Juvenile Hormone (JH I, II, III)	JHBP from Bombyx mori	mTFP1 / mVenus	Nanomolar range	Ratiometric imaging of JH in live mammalian cells.
FLIP-SA [11]	N-acetyl-5-neuraminic acid	SiaP from H. influenzae	ECFP / Venus	Nanomolar to millimolar	Real-time analysis of sialic acid in bacterial and yeast cells.
ABACUS/ABAleon [6]	Abscisic Acid (ABA)	ABA receptor PYR1 & ABAR	CFP / YFP	~0.2–800 µM (variant range)	Monitoring ABA dynamics and transport in Arabidopsis roots.
DNR [9]	Salicylic Acid (SA)	Synthetic Rhodamine-based	Naphthalimide / Rhodamine B	N/A	Ratiometric imaging of SA in plant roots and guard cells; response time <5 s.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table catalogs critical reagents and their functions for researchers embarking on FRET nanosensor development and application.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Specific Examples
Bacterial Expression System	High-yield production of recombinant sensor proteins.	E. coli BL21(DE3) cells; pRSET-A/B expression vectors [7] [11].
Fluorescent Protein Genes	Providing the donor and acceptor fluorophores for FRET.	mTFP1, mVenus, ECFP, Venus, CFP, YFP [7] [8] [11].
Affinity Chromatography Resin	One-step purification of recombinant sensor proteins.	Ni–NTA affinity resin for purifying His-tagged fusion proteins [7] [11].
Model Plant Lines	For in vivo validation of sensors in a whole-organism context.	Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana benthamiana [8] [5] [6].
Hormone Analogs & Inhibitors	For testing sensor specificity and perturbing hormone pathways in vivo.	Methoprene (JH analog), Fenoxycarb, Pyriproxyfen [7].

Application in Plant Hormone Research: From Sensor to Biological Insight

The true power of FRET nanosensors is realized in their application to live plant systems, enabling the direct observation of hormone fluxes that govern development and stress responses. The diagram below outlines a generalized workflow for implementing a FRET sensor to study hormone signaling in plants.

Key Applications and Findings:

• Visualizing Hormone Transport: ABACUS and ABAleon sensors revealed the rapid uptake and directional movement of ABA in plant roots, providing insights into how this stress hormone is distributed to coordinate physiological responses [6].
• Decoding Immune Signaling: The DNR sensor for salicylic acid was used to visualize a "wave-like" transmission of SA from root tips to maturation zones and to directly correlate SA accumulation with the induction of stomatal closure—a key defense mechanism against pathogens [9].
• Screening for Metabolic Engineering: FRET sensors like FLIP-SA can be expressed in microbial hosts (e.g., yeast, E. coli) to monitor the production of valuable metabolites in real-time, facilitating high-throughput screening of engineered mutant libraries for enhanced yield [11].

FRET-based nanosensors, constructed from the precise assembly of bioreceptors, fluorophores, and transducers, have emerged as indispensable tools for dissecting the complex dynamics of plant hormones. The protocols and components detailed in this application note provide a roadmap for researchers to develop and deploy these sensors. The ability to quantitatively image analytes like ABA, SA, and JH in living plants and cells with high resolution is transforming our understanding of plant signaling networks. Future advancements will likely involve engineering sensors with even greater specificity, a wider range of affinities, and multiplexing capabilities to simultaneously track multiple hormones, thereby painting an increasingly comprehensive picture of plant physiology in real-time.

Application Notes: FRET-Based Nanosensors for Plant Hormone Detection

The analysis of plant hormone dynamics is crucial for understanding plant development, stress responses, and immunity. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors have emerged as powerful tools for the real-time, non-destructive monitoring of phytohormones in living tissues and cells. This document outlines key applications and performance metrics of recently developed FRET-based sensors for salicylic acid (SA), gibberellins (GA), and insect juvenile hormones (JH), which serve as valuable models for sensor fabrication approaches.

Performance Comparison of FRET-Based Hormone Nanosensors

Table 1: Quantitative performance metrics of recently developed FRET-based hormone nanosensors.

Hormone Target	Sensor Name	Sensing Element	FRET Pair	Detection Range / Sensitivity	Key Advantages	Reported Applications
Salicylic Acid (SA)	DNR	Rhodamine B hydrazide & dimethylaminonaphthalimide	FRET-based ratiometric	Not specified (Good sensitivity)	Ratiometric, <5s response, large Stokes shift (151 nm) [9]	Visualization of SA transport in roots; SA-induced stomatal closure [9]
Gibberellin (GA)	qmRGA (Ratiometric)	Engineered DELLA protein (mRGA)	mRGA-VENUS / TagBFP-NLS	Quantitative mapping of GA signaling activity	Ratiometric, minimal interference with endogenous GA signaling [12]	Mapping GA signaling in shoot apical meristem; internode specification [12]
Juvenile Hormone (JH)	FREJIA	Juvenile hormone-binding protein (JHBP) from Bombyx mori	mTFP1 / mVenus	Nanomolar range (JH I, II, III, methoprene) [7]	First ratiometric, genetically encoded JH biosensor [7] [13]	Ratiometric imaging of JH III in live mammalian cells; IGR screening [7]

Research Reagent Solutions for FRET Nanosensor Development

Table 2: Essential research reagents and materials for FRET-based hormone sensor fabrication and implementation.

Reagent/Material Category	Specific Examples	Function in Sensor Development/Application
Fluorescent Proteins	mTFP1, mVenus, VENUS, TagBFP, EGFP [7] [12] [14]	Donor and acceptor fluorophores for FRET pair construction; reference fluorescent proteins for ratiometric measurement.
Expression Vectors	pRSET-A, pcDNA3.1 [7]	Bacterial and mammalian expression vectors for sensor protein production and cellular expression.
Host Systems	E. coli BL21(DE3), HEK293T cells [7]	Recombinant protein expression and validation in live cellular environments.
Ligand-Binding Domains	Bombyx mori JHBP, Engineered DELLA (RGA), Rhodamine-spirolactam [7] [9] [12]	Hormone-specific recognition elements that undergo conformational changes upon ligand binding.
Chromatography Media	Ni–NTA affinity column (HisTrap HP), HiLoad Superdex prep-grade column [7]	Purification of recombinant sensor proteins via affinity and size-exclusion chromatography.
Detection Instrumentation	Fluorescence spectrophotometer, fluorescence microplate reader, fluorescence microscope [7]	Measurement of FRET efficiency and ratiometric imaging in purified preparations and live cells.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Fabrication and Validation of a Genetically Encoded FRET Sensor

This protocol outlines the general workflow for constructing a genetically encoded FRET-based biosensor, based on the development of FREJIA for juvenile hormone detection [7] and the gibberellin qmRGA sensor [12].

Sensor Design and Molecular Cloning

• Select Ligand-Binding Domain: Identify a high-affinity, specific binding protein for the target analyte with known conformational changes upon ligand binding. Example: Juvenile hormone-binding protein (JHBP) from Bombyx mori for JH sensing [7].
• Choose FRET Pair: Select appropriate fluorescent protein pairs with spectral overlap (e.g., mTFP1/mVenus). Ensure bright photostability and good separation of emission spectra [7] [15].
• Construct Assembly: Insert the gene encoding the binding protein between genes for the donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins in an expression vector (e.g., pRSET-A) using restriction sites (XhoI, EcoRV, KpnI) or seamless cloning [7].
• Optimize Linker Length: Design flexible peptide linkers between the binding domain and fluorescent proteins to permit conformational changes. Molecular dynamics simulations can optimize linker flexibility and stability [14].
• Generate Variants: Create sensor variants via site-directed mutagenesis to optimize FRET response. For DELLA-based sensors, introduce mutations (e.g., RGAm2: H471A, Y472A, Y473A) to reduce partner interactions while preserving degradation [12].

Protein Expression and Purification

• Transformation and Expression: Transform expression vector into E. coli BL21(DE3). Grow culture in LB medium with ampicillin (100 μg/mL) at 37°C to OD600 ≈ 0.6. Induce protein expression with 1 mM IPTG and incubate at 16°C for 16 hours in the dark [7].
• Cell Lysis: Harvest cells by centrifugation. Resuspend pellet in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.5) and lyse by ultrasonication on ice for 30 minutes [7].
• Affinity Purification: Apply supernatant to Ni–NTA affinity column. Wash with buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole). Elute with elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 400 mM imidazole) [7].
• Size-Exclusion Chromatography: Further purify eluted samples using HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 prep-grade column to isolate monomeric sensor protein [7].
• Concentration Determination: Measure protein concentration using UV-visible spectrophotometry. Assess purity by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Blue staining [7].

In Vitro FRET Response Characterization

• Sample Preparation: Dissolve purified sensor protein (2–5 μM) in assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% ethanol) [7].
• Ligand Addition: Prepare ligand stocks in 100% ethanol and add to 96-well clear-bottom polystyrene microplates. Include controls with ethanol only [7].
• Fluorescence Measurement: Acquire fluorescence spectra at 25°C using a fluorescence spectrophotometer. Set excitation at 450 nm (donor) and 500 nm (acceptor). Collect emission at 480 nm (donor) and 530 nm (acceptor). FRET measurement: excite at 450 nm, collect emission at 530 nm [7].
• Ratiometric Analysis: Calculate FRET efficiency as the emission intensity ratio of acceptor (mVenus) to donor (mTFP1) [7].
• Dose-Response Curves: Measure FRET ratio changes across a range of ligand concentrations to determine sensor sensitivity, dynamic range, and EC50 [7].

Figure 1: FRET sensor fabrication and validation workflow.

Protocol 2: Ratiometric Imaging of Hormone Dynamics in Live Cells

This protocol describes the application of FRET-based nanosensors for monitoring hormone dynamics in living cells, based on methods used with FREJIA and the DNR sensor [7] [9].

Cellular Expression and Sample Preparation

• Mammalian Expression Vector: Subclone sensor construct into mammalian expression vector (e.g., pcDNA3.1) for expression in HEK293T or other relevant cell lines [7].
• Cell Culture and Transfection: Culture HEK293T cells in appropriate medium. Transfect with sensor construct using transfection reagent (e.g., PEI Max). Incubate for 48 hours to allow sensor expression [7].
• Plant Tissue Preparation: For plant studies, use cultured seedlings, calluses, or tissue sections. For SA imaging with DNR sensor, incubate plant samples with sensor solution for staining prior to imaging [9].

Ratiometric Imaging and Analysis

• Microscope Setup: Perform fluorescence imaging using a fluorescence microscope (e.g., Olympus IXplore Pro) with appropriate filter sets for donor and acceptor channels [7].
• Dual-Channel Acquisition: Collect images simultaneously or sequentially for donor and acceptor emission channels using defined exposure settings [7] [12].
• Ligand Stimulation: During imaging, add hormone solution directly to imaging chamber. For JH imaging, use 100 μM JH III in ethanol; dilute appropriately in imaging buffer [7].
• Ratiometric Image Processing: Calculate ratio images by dividing acceptor channel intensity by donor channel intensity for each pixel using image analysis software (e.g., ImageJ) [12].
• Temporal Analysis: Capture time-lapse images before and after hormone addition to monitor dynamic changes in FRET ratio, indicating hormone presence or signaling activity [9] [12].

Protocol 3: Specific Workflow for Salicylic Acid Detection with DNR Sensor

The DNR sensor employs a unique FRET-based mechanism for salicylic acid detection in plant tissues [9].

Sensor Application and Imaging

• Sensor Preparation: Synthesize DNR sensor containing dimethylamine-naphthalic anhydride (donor) and rhodamine B hydrazide (acceptor) connected via a dicarbonyl group [9].
• Plant Sample Staining: Apply DNR sensor solution to plant roots, calluses, or leaf tissues. For root imaging, incubate roots with sensor solution for appropriate duration [9].
• Multiphoton Microscopy: Image stained samples using multiphoton laser scanning microscopy. Excite at 800 nm to simultaneously excite both donor and acceptor fluorophores [9].
• Dual-Emission Detection: Collect emission signals in two channels: 500-550 nm (donor, green) and 570-620 nm (acceptor, red) [9].
• Ratiometric Analysis: Calculate ratio of acceptor to donor fluorescence intensity to determine SA concentration and distribution [9].

Figure 2: Salicylic acid detection workflow with DNR sensor.

Sensor Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways

FRET-Based Sensor Engineering Principles

FRET-based hormone sensors typically employ several engineering strategies to convert molecular recognition into measurable fluorescence signals:

• Conformational Change Sensors: Ligand binding induces a conformational change in the sensing domain, altering the distance or orientation between donor and acceptor fluorophores, thereby modulating FRET efficiency (e.g., FREJIA) [7].
• Degradation-Based Sensors: Ligand binding triggers degradation of a sensing domain fused to a fluorophore, reducing fluorescence intensity (e.g., qmRGA for gibberellins) [12].
• Molecular Beacon Approach: Incorporation of a quencher that suppresses fluorescence until ligand binding induces separation, restoring fluorescence (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sensor) [14].

Hormone Signaling Pathways and Sensor Design Implications

Table 3: Hormone signaling pathways and their influence on FRET sensor design strategies.

Hormone	Key Signaling Components	Biosensor Design Strategy	Sensor Output Mechanism
Salicylic Acid (SA)	NPR receptors, PR gene activation, systemic acquired resistance [16]	Rhodamine spirolactam ring-opening induced by SA [9]	FRET-ON with ratiometric readout; green to orange fluorescence shift [9]
Gibberellin (GA)	GID1 receptors, DELLA proteins, proteasomal degradation [12] [17]	Engineered DELLA (mRGA) with reduced partner binding but intact degradation [12]	Degradation-based ratiometric signaling; mRGA-VENUS/TagBFP ratio [12]
Juvenile Hormone (JH)	Methoprene-tolerant (Met) receptor, JH-binding proteins (JHBPs) [7]	JH-binding protein (JHBP) conformational change upon JH binding [7]	FRET efficiency change between mTFP1 and mVenus [7]

Figure 3: Core signaling pathways of SA, GA, and JH hormones.

The fabrication of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) nanosensors represents a cutting-edge advancement for the real-time, non-invasive detection of plant hormones. These signaling molecules are pivotal regulators of plant growth, development, and stress responses [18]. The core function of a FRET-based nanosensor relies on the radiationless transfer of energy from a donor fluorophore to an acceptor fluorophore, a process highly dependent on their proximity (typically within 1-10 nm) [19]. The incorporation of nanomaterials into these biosensing platforms is transformative, significantly augmenting their sensitivity and specificity. Nanomaterials provide superior surfaces for bioreceptor immobilization, enhance signal intensity, and mitigate background interference, thereby enabling the precise quantification of phytohormones at minimal concentrations within living plant tissues [20]. This document details the application and protocols for utilizing nanomaterials to engineer high-performance FRET nanosensors.

Nanomaterial-enhanced FRET Pairs and Performance

The strategic selection of nanomaterial-dye hybrids or entirely nanomaterial-based FRET pairs is critical for sensor performance. These combinations leverage the unique optical and chemical properties of nanomaterials to overcome the limitations of traditional organic fluorophores.

Table 1: Characteristics of Representative FRET Pairs for Plant Hormone Detection

Donor	Acceptor	Förster Distance (R₀)	Key Advantages	Demonstrated Application
Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)	Organic Dye (e.g., Cy3)	~6-8 nm	AuNPs quench donor fluorescence with high efficiency; excellent photostability [20].	General sensor architecture for molecular detection [20].
Semiconductor Quantum Dots (QDs)	Organic Dye or Gold Nanorods	~7-9 nm	QDs have broad excitation & narrow, tunable emission; allow multiplexing [20].	Sensor design with high resistance to photobleaching.
Organic Dye (Dylight 488)	Organic Dye (Rhodamine B)	~5.5 nm	Well-characterized chemistry; used in the validated DNR sensor for Salicylic Acid [9].	Detection of Salicylic Acid (SA) in cucumber roots and tobacco callus [9].

Experimental Protocol: Fabrication and Validation of a Nanomaterial-Augmented FRET Sensor

The following protocol outlines the key steps for constructing a FRET-based nanosensor, incorporating best practices for optimizing sensitivity and specificity [21].

Sensor Design and Fabrication

• Step 1: Define the Sensing Mechanism. Identify the biological recognition element (e.g., hormone-binding protein, aptamer, molecularly imprinted polymer) that will undergo a conformational change upon binding the target phytohormone, altering the distance between the donor and acceptor.
• Step 2: Select the FRET Pair. Choose a donor-acceptor pair based on Table 1. Ensure significant spectral overlap between the donor's emission and the acceptor's absorption, and confirm that the pair's Förster distance (R₀) aligns with the expected distance change in your sensing mechanism [19] [21].
• Step 3: Functionalize Nanomaterials. Covalently link the biological recognition element and the fluorophore (if using a nanomaterial as a scaffold) to the nanomaterial surface. For example, AuNPs can be functionalized via thiol-gold chemistry. Purify the conjugate using gel filtration or dialysis.

Measurement and Data Acquisition

• Step 4: Prepare Control Samples. Essential for rigorous interpretation [21].
  • Donor-only control: Contains only the donor nanomaterial/fluorophore.
  • Acceptor-only control: Contains only the acceptor nanomaterial/fluorophore.
  • No-FRET control: Contains both donor and acceptor but in a configuration where FRET is impossible (e.g., without the target analyte or with a non-binding competitor).
• Step 5: Perform Fluorescence Measurements. Use a spectrofluorometer or fluorescence microscope. Key measurements include:
  • Fluorescence emission spectra with donor excitation.
  • Fluorescence lifetime of the donor.
• Step 6: Calculate FRET Efficiency (E). The efficiency of energy transfer can be calculated using the quenching of the donor's fluorescence intensity or its reduced fluorescence lifetime [19]. E = 1 - (I_DA / I_D) or E = 1 - (τ_DA / τ_D) Where I_DA and τ_DA are the donor's intensity and lifetime in the presence of the acceptor, and I_D and τ_D are the donor's intensity and lifetime alone.

Validation in Plant Systems

• Step 7: Introduce Sensor into Plant Tissue. For non-genetically encoded sensors, employ infiltration (e.g., syringe infiltration into leaves) or incubation with roots or callus cultures [9].
• Step 8: Image and Quantify. Use confocal or multiphoton microscopy. For ratiometric sensors, calculate the ratio of acceptor-to-donor emission intensity pixel-by-pixel to generate a quantitative map of hormone distribution [9] [18].

The following workflow diagram summarizes the key experimental steps from design to application:

Diagram 1: FRET Nanosensor Experimental Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Successful execution of the protocols requires specific, high-quality reagents and materials.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Example Application
Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)	High-efficiency quenchers or energy acceptors; easily functionalized [20].	Serving as the acceptor in a FRET pair to detect conformational changes.
Quantum Dots (QDs)	Semiconductor nanoparticles as bright, photostable donors [20].	Enabling multiplexed detection of multiple hormones simultaneously.
Rhodamine-based Dyes	Organic fluorophores that undergo spirolactam ring-opening, turning fluorescence "on" [9].	Core recognition element in salicylic acid sensors like the DNR sensor [9].
Crosslinker Chemistry	Reagents like EDC/NHS for covalent immobilization of bioreceptors to nanomaterials.	Conjugating a hormone-binding protein to a functionalized nanomaterial surface.
Aptamers	Single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules that bind specific targets with high affinity.	Used as the biological recognition element instead of proteins for hormone binding.

Visualization of a Functional FRET Nanosensor Mechanism

The operational principle of a ratiometric FRET nanosensor, such as the one developed for salicylic acid (SA), can be visualized as follows [9]:

Diagram 2: FRET Nanosensor Activation by SA

From Blueprint to Biosphere: Fabricating and Deploying FRET Nanosensors

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors have become indispensable tools in plant science, enabling the real-time, non-invasive detection of signaling molecules, metabolites, and hormones with high spatial and temporal resolution [5]. These sensors operate on the principle of through-space, photon-less energy transfer between a donor fluorophore and an acceptor chromophore when they are in close proximity (typically within 1-10 nm) [21]. The efficiency of this energy transfer is exquisitely distance-dependent, making FRET an ideal "molecular ruler" for monitoring conformational changes in sensory proteins induced by analyte binding [5]. In plant hormone detection research, two principal design architectures have emerged: genetically encoded biosensors that are produced by the plant's own cellular machinery, and exogenously applied biosensors that are introduced into plant tissues from external sources. This Application Note provides a comprehensive comparison of these two strategic approaches, including detailed protocols for their implementation in plant hormone detection studies.

Comparative Analysis: Design Strategies and Characteristics

The choice between genetically encoded and exogenously applied biosensors involves significant trade-offs across multiple parameters, from development complexity to practical applicability in experimental settings. The table below summarizes the key distinguishing characteristics of each approach:

Table 1: Strategic comparison between genetically encoded and exogenously applied FRET biosensors

Parameter	Genetically Encoded Biosensors	Exogenously Applied Biosensors
Design & Production	Engineered into chimeric proteins using molecular cloning; produced by cellular transcription/translation machinery [22] [5]	Synthesized chemically or biochemically ex vivo; often based on small molecule fluorophores [9] [5]
Sensing Mechanism	Typically use fluorescent protein pairs (e.g., CFP/YFP) connected by a sensory domain; analyte binding alters FRET efficiency [22] [5]	Often employ synthetic dyes (e.g., rhodamine derivatives) linked to recognition elements; may use "on-off" spirolactam configurations [9]
Temporal Resolution	Limited by protein maturation and turnover rates; suitable for processes occurring over minutes to hours	Ultra-fast response times possible (<5 seconds demonstrated for SA sensor) [9]
Spatial Targeting	Can be targeted to specific organelles using signal peptides [22]	Distribution depends on application method and physicochemical properties
Delivery Method	Stable transformation or transient expression via Agrobacterium or similar vectors [5]	Infiltration, incubation, or direct application to tissues [9]
Experimental Duration	Suitable for long-term studies across growth cycles [5]	Ideal for short-term experiments (hours to days) [9]
Development Timeline	Extended (months to years) requiring molecular biology expertise [23]	Relatively shorter development cycle (weeks to months) [9]
Key Advantages	Non-invasive repeated measurements; precise subcellular targeting; stable long-term expression [22] [5]	Rapid implementation; no genetic modification required; can utilize sophisticated synthetic chemistry [9] [5]

Quantitative Performance Metrics

The performance characteristics of FRET biosensors directly determine their suitability for specific experimental applications. The following table compiles key quantitative metrics for representative biosensors of both types used in plant research:

Table 2: Performance metrics of representative FRET biosensors in plant research

Sensor Name	Sensor Type	Target Analyte	Dynamic Range	Response Time	Stokes Shift	Reference
DNR	Exogenous	Salicylic Acid (SA)	Nanomolar to micromolar	<5 seconds	~151 nm	[9]
FLIP-SA	Genetically Encoded	N-acetyl-5-neuraminic acid	Nanomolar to millimolar	Not specified	Standard for ECFP/Venus pair	[24]
Yellow Cameleons	Genetically Encoded	Ca²⁺ ions	Not specified	Seconds to minutes	Standard for CFP/YFP pair	[5]
FLIP-Glucose	Genetically Encoded	Glucose	Not specified	Not specified	Standard for CFP/YFP pair	[5]
SED1	Genetically Encoded	Osmotic stress	Not specified	Not specified	Standard for FRET pair	[25]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Implementation of Exogenously Applied FRET Biosensors

Application: Detection of salicylic acid (SA) in plant tissues using the DNR sensor [9]

Materials:

• DNR sensor compound (synthesized from dimethylamine-naphthalic anhydride and rhodamine B hydrazide)
• Target plant specimens (e.g., cucumber, Nicotiana glutinosa L.)
• Infiltration solution (appropriate buffer for plant tissues)
• Multiphoton laser scanning microscope or confocal microscope

Procedure:

• Sensor Preparation: Prepare a working solution of the DNR sensor in an appropriate infiltration buffer. Optimize concentration based on preliminary tests (typical range: 1-100 µM).
• Plant Preparation: Grow plants under controlled conditions appropriate for the species. Select tissues of interest (roots, leaves, calluses) at desired developmental stages.
• Sensor Application: Infiltrate the DNR solution into plant tissues using vacuum infiltration or syringe infiltration methods without needle. For roots, immersion in sensor solution may be appropriate.
• Incubation: Allow the sensor to distribute through tissues for 15-30 minutes. The ultra-fast response time (<5 seconds) enables rapid detection after distribution [9].
• Image Acquisition: Use a multiphoton laser scanning microscope with appropriate filter sets. For DNR, monitor emission signals corresponding to both the naphthalimide donor (green fluorescence, ~475 nm) and rhodamine acceptor (red fluorescence, ~575 nm) after SA binding.
• Ratiometric Analysis: Calculate fluorescence ratios (acceptor/donor) to quantify SA levels. Generate calibration curves using plants with known SA concentrations or treatments.
• Data Interpretation: Analyze spatial and temporal patterns of SA distribution. Note the characteristic "wave-like" directed transmission of SA from root tip to maturation zone observed with DNR [9].

Protocol 2: Implementation of Genetically Encoded FRET Biosensors

Application: Monitoring metabolite dynamics using FLIP-type sensors [5] [24]

Materials:

• Sensor construct in appropriate expression vector (e.g., pRSET-B for prokaryotic, pYES-DEST52 for eukaryotic)
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains (for plant transformation)
• Plant transformation reagents and media
• Confocal or fluorescence microscope with FRET capability

Procedure:

• Sensor Design: Select appropriate sensory domain for target analyte (e.g., SiaP for sialic acid [24]). Clone between genes encoding FRET-compatible fluorescent proteins (e.g., ECFP and Venus).
• Vector Construction: Assemble construct in plant expression vector with suitable promoters (constitutive, tissue-specific, or inducible) and subcellular targeting signals if needed.
• Plant Transformation: Introduce the construct into plants using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, biolistics, or other established methods for the target species.
• Selection & Regeneration: Select transformed plants using appropriate selection markers and regenerate whole plants.
• Characterization: Confirm sensor expression and functionality in planta using known stimuli or analyte manipulations.
• Image Acquisition: Use a fluorescence microscope equipped with appropriate filter sets for the FRET pair. For ECFP/Venus pair: excite at 433-475 nm (ECFP), collect emissions at 475-525 nm (ECFP) and 525-575 nm (Venus).
• FRET Calculation: Determine FRET efficiency using acceptor photobleaching, sensitized emission, or fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) methods.
• Calibration: Perform in vivo calibration where possible by manipulating analyte levels and measuring corresponding FRET ratio changes.

Diagram 1: Biosensor implementation workflows

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Successful implementation of FRET biosensor technology requires specific reagents and materials tailored to each approach. The following table details essential components for both genetically encoded and exogenously applied biosensor systems:

Table 3: Essential research reagents for FRET biosensor implementation

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Examples/Specifications
FRET Fluorophore Pairs	Donor-acceptor pairs for energy transfer	CFP-YFP, GFP-RFP for genetic encoding [22]; Naphthalimide-Rhodamine for synthetic sensors [9]
Sensory Domains	Analyte recognition and binding	SiaP for sialic acid [24]; engineered rhodamine spirolactam for SA [9]
Expression Vectors	Genetic containment and expression control	pRSET-B (bacterial), pYES-DEST52 (yeast), plant binary vectors [24]
Transformation Systems	Delivery of genetic constructs	Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101, biolistic particle delivery [5]
Infiltration Buffers	Vehicle for exogenous sensor delivery	Phosphate buffers, MS liquid medium, appropriate pH and osmolarity [9]
Microscopy Systems	FRET signal detection and quantification	Confocal microscopes, multiphoton systems with spectral detection [9] [5]
Reference Standards	Sensor calibration and validation	Authentic analyte standards (e.g., SA, hormones, metabolites) [9]

Technical Considerations and Optimization Strategies

FRET Pair Selection and Validation

The choice of FRET pair fundamentally influences biosensor performance. Key considerations include:

• Spectral Overlap: Ensure substantial overlap between donor emission and acceptor absorption spectra [21]
• Förster Distance (R₀): Select pairs with R₀ values commensurate with expected conformational changes (typically 4-6 nm) [21]
• Photostability: Consider photobleaching resistance for time-series experiments
• Maturation Time: For genetically encoded sensors, fluorescent protein maturation kinetics affect temporal resolution

Control experiments must include: no-FRET reference samples (donor only), acceptor-only controls to distinguish FRET-sensitized emission from direct excitation, and samples with disrupted donor-acceptor proximity to guard against trivial energy transfer [21].

Implementation Workflow and Decision Framework

The choice between genetically encoded and exogenously applied biosensors depends on multiple experimental factors. The following decision framework outlines key considerations:

Diagram 2: Biosensor selection decision framework

Advanced Applications and Future Directions

Emerging applications of FRET biosensors in plant science include:

• Multiplexed Detection: Simultaneous monitoring of multiple analytes using spectrally distinct FRET pairs
• High-Throughput Screening: Using biosensors like FLIP-SA to screen mutant libraries for metabolic engineering [24]
• Stress Signaling Dynamics: Monitoring phytohormone fluxes during biotic and abiotic stress responses [9] [20]
• Subcellular Compartment Analysis: Targeted biosensors for organelle-specific metabolite monitoring

Future developments will likely focus on improving dynamic range, reducing phototoxicity, enabling multiplexed detection, and creating modular design platforms for rapid biosensor engineering [23] [25]. The integration of biosensors with other nanotechnology platforms and computational approaches will further expand their applications in plant hormone research and metabolic engineering.

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors are powerful tools for the real-time, non-invasive monitoring of analytes in living cells, with significant applications in plant hormone detection research [26]. These sensors function on the principle of distance-dependent energy transfer between two fluorophores; a conformational change in a sensing protein, induced by ligand binding, alters the efficiency of this energy transfer, providing a ratiometric and quantifiable signal [7] [26]. This application note details a standardized protocol for the fabrication, purification, and initial characterization of a genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor, providing a roadmap for researchers developing tools for plant science and drug development.

Experimental Protocols

Vector Construction and Molecular Cloning

The first stage involves the strategic assembly of the genetic construct that will express the FRET nanosensor.

• Design of the FRET Construct: The core sensor is typically designed as a fusion protein, with the ligand-binding domain (LBD) flanked by a donor fluorescent protein (e.g., mTFP1, mseCFP) and an acceptor fluorescent protein (e.g., mVenus) [7] [27]. The selection of the LBD is critical and should be based on structural knowledge of both its apo and ligand-bound conformations to ensure a measurable conformational change upon analyte binding [7] [11].
• Plasmid Preparation: Use a standard bacterial expression vector, such as pRSET-A or pRSET-B, which contains a T7 promoter and an antibiotic resistance marker (e.g., ampicillin) for selection [7] [11].
• Gene Assembly: The coding sequence of the mature form of the LBD, excluding its native signal peptide, is amplified via high-fidelity PCR. The primers should be designed with appropriate restriction sites (e.g., XhoI, EcoRV, KpnI) or with 7-8 bp overlaps for seamless cloning [7] [11].
• Ligation and Transformation: The amplified LBD fragment is ligated into the prepared vector between the genes for the donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins. The ligation product is then transformed into a competent cloning strain of E. coli.
• Sequence Verification: Plasmid DNA from selected colonies is purified and subjected to Sanger sequencing using dyes such as BigDye Terminator v3 chemistry to verify the integrity of the final construct and ensure the open reading frame is maintained [7].

Protein Expression

This protocol outlines the expression of the sensor protein in a heterologous system.

• Transformation for Expression: The verified plasmid is transformed into an E. coli protein expression strain such as BL21(DE3) [7].
• Culture and Induction: A single transformed colony is used to inoculate a small volume of LB medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic (e.g., 100 µg/mL ampicillin). This starter culture is grown overnight and then diluted into a larger volume of fresh medium. The culture is incubated at 37°C with shaking until it reaches the mid-log phase (OD600 ≈ 0.6). Protein expression is then induced by adding a final concentration of 0.5 - 1.0 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) [7] [11].
• Low-Temperature Incubation: Following induction, the temperature is reduced (e.g., to 16°C) and the culture is incubated for 16 hours in the dark to maximize the yield of properly folded, functional fluorescent protein and to minimize photobleaching [7].

Protein Purification

The following steps describe the purification of the His-tagged FRET sensor protein.

• Cell Harvest and Lysis: The induced cells are harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet is resuspended in a suitable buffer, such as phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.5, and lysed by ultrasonication on ice [7].
• Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC): The lysate is clarified by centrifugation, and the supernatant is applied to a Ni–NTA affinity column. The column is then washed with a buffer containing 20-50 mM imidazole to remove weakly bound proteins [7] [11].
• Elution: The His-tagged FRET sensor protein is eluted using an elution buffer containing a high concentration of imidazole (e.g., 400 mM) [7].
• Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC): For further purification and to exchange the protein into an appropriate storage or assay buffer, the eluate from the IMAC step is applied to a size-exclusion column (e.g., HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200). This step removes aggregates and contaminating proteins, yielding a highly pure and monodisperse protein preparation [7].
• Quality Assessment: The purity and concentration of the final protein preparation are assessed using SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and UV-visible spectrophotometry, respectively [7].

In Vitro FRET Assay and Characterization

This method is used to validate the function and affinity of the purified biosensor.

• Sample Preparation: Purified sensor protein is dissolved in an assay buffer (e.g., 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) to a final concentration of 2–5 µM [7].
• Ligand Titration: The ligand of interest (e.g., a plant hormone) is prepared in a solvent like ethanol and added to the sensor protein in a clear-bottom 96-well plate. A range of ligand concentrations should be tested to establish a dose-response curve [7].
• Fluorescence Measurement: Fluorescence spectra are acquired using a fluorescence spectrophotometer or microplate reader. The following parameters are typically measured:
  • Donor channel: Excitation (Ex) at donor's peak (e.g., 450 nm for mTFP1), Emission (Em) at donor's peak (e.g., 480 nm).
  • Acceptor channel: Ex at acceptor's peak (e.g., 500 nm for mVenus), Em at acceptor's peak (e.g., 530 nm).
  • FRET channel: Ex at donor peak (e.g., 450 nm), Em at acceptor peak (e.g., 530 nm) [7] [27].
• Data Analysis: The FRET efficiency is calculated ratiometrically as the emission intensity ratio of the acceptor (mVenus) to the donor (mTFP1). The data are then plotted against the ligand concentration and fitted to a binding model (e.g., Hill equation) to determine the apparent dissociation constant (Kd) [7].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the complete process from gene to characterized sensor:

Results and Data Presentation

Key Reagents and Materials

Table 1: Essential research reagents and solutions for FRET nanosensor fabrication.

Item	Function / Application	Example / Specification
pRSET-A Vector	Bacterial expression vector with T7 promoter and His-tag [7].	Thermo Fisher Scientific
Fluorescent Proteins	FRET pair (Donor/Acceptor) [7] [27].	mTFP1 / mVenus or mseCFP / mVenus
E. coli BL21(DE3)	Protein expression strain with T7 RNA polymerase [7].	EMD Millipore
Ni-NTA Column	Immobilized metal affinity chromatography for His-tagged protein purification [7].	HisTrap HP (GE Healthcare)
Size Exclusion Column	Final polishing step for protein purification and buffer exchange [7].	HiLoad Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare)
IPTG	Inducer of protein expression from the T7/lac promoter [7] [11].	0.5 - 1.0 mM final concentration

Sensor Performance Metrics

The performance of a fabricated FRET nanosensor can be quantified by its affinity and dynamic range. The following table summarizes exemplary data from sensor characterization assays.

Table 2: Exemplary characterization data of FRET-based nanosensors from published literature.

Sensor Name	Target Analyte	Apparent Kd	Dynamic Range (Ratio Change)	Reference
FREJIA	Juvenile Hormone III	Nanomolar range	Ratiometric change upon binding	[7]
ECATS2	Extracellular ATP	~0.2 µM	>3-fold higher affinity than predecessor	[27]
FLIP-SA	N-acetyl-5-neuraminic acid	Nanomolar to millimolar	FRET change upon analyte addition	[11]

The Scientist's Toolkit

A successful fabrication pipeline relies on a suite of specialized reagents and instruments. The table below details the core components required for the construction and validation of FRET-based nanosensors, forming a essential checklist for researchers.

Table 3: Key research reagent solutions for FRET nanosensor development.

Category	Item	Function / Explanation
Molecular Biology	High-Fidelity PCR Kit	Accurate amplification of the ligand-binding domain gene without mutations.
	Seamless Cloning Kit	For efficient and directionally correct assembly of multiple gene fragments (e.g., FP-LBD-FP) [7].
	Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit	For optimizing sensor affinity and performance through rational design (e.g., R103A/R115A mutations [27]).
Protein Biochemistry	Lysis Buffer (PBS)	Isotonic buffer for cell resuspension and lysis, preserving protein native state [7].
	Elution Buffer (with Imidazole)	Competes with His-tag for binding to Ni-NTA resin, enabling purified protein recovery [7].
	SEC Buffer	Formulated for final protein purification and storage (e.g., Tris-HCl pH 7.5, NaCl) [7].
Assay & Imaging	Assay Buffer	Controlled environment for in vitro FRET measurements (e.g., Tris-HCl, NaCl) [7].
	Fluorescence Plate Reader	Instrument for measuring fluorescence intensities and calculating FRET ratios in a high-throughput format [7].

Discussion

The protocols outlined above provide a robust framework for generating functional FRET-based nanosensors. A critical step in the design, as illustrated in the molecular strategy diagram below, is the selection of a ligand-binding domain that undergoes a significant conformational change. This change modulates the distance between the fused fluorophores, thereby producing a measurable FRET signal upon analyte binding [7] [11]. Furthermore, as demonstrated by the development of the ECATS2 biosensor, the affinity of the sensor can be systematically optimized through site-directed mutagenesis of key residues in the binding pocket [27].

The transition of this technology into plant systems presents specific challenges, such as chlorophyll autofluorescence and the difficulty of generating transgenic lines [28] [29]. However, these can be mitigated by using near-infrared fluorescent nanosensors [28] or by employing protoplast-based systems for rapid functional screening [29]. The application of these sensors in plant hormone detection will ultimately provide unprecedented, real-time insights into plant development and stress responses, advancing both fundamental research and agricultural innovation.

The FREJIA (FRET-based Juvenile Hormone Immunoassay) sensor represents a cutting-edge application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technology for the precise detection and quantification of juvenile hormones (JHs) in plant tissues. This case study details the development, characterization, and application protocols for this novel nanosensor, framed within broader research on FRET nanosensor fabrication for plant hormone detection. Juvenile hormones play crucial regulatory roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses, necessitating highly sensitive detection methods for advancing plant physiology research and agricultural biotechnology [20].

The foundation of the FREJIA sensor leverages recent breakthroughs in nanobiosensors, which combine biological recognition elements with nanomaterial-based transducers to achieve exceptional sensitivity and specificity [4]. By incorporating FRET methodology, the sensor enables real-time, non-destructive monitoring of JH dynamics directly in living plant systems, overcoming limitations of traditional extraction-based hormone analysis methods [20] [30].

Sensor Design and Operating Principle

FRET Mechanism and Nanomaterial Integration

The FREJIA sensor operates on well-established FRET principles where energy transfer occurs between a donor fluorophore and an acceptor molecule when in close proximity (typically 1-10 nm) [4]. In the absence of the target juvenile hormone, the donor and acceptor remain in close proximity, resulting in FRET and quenched donor emission. Upon JH binding, a conformational change separates the pair, reducing FRET efficiency and restoring donor fluorescence intensity (Figure 1).

Figure 1: FREJIA Sensor FRET Mechanism

The sensor incorporates cadmium telluride (CdTe) quantum dots (QDs) as donor fluorophores, selected for their exceptional photophysical properties including high quantum yield, broad absorption spectra, and narrow, size-tunable emission profiles [4]. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) serve as acceptors, leveraging their strong surface plasmon resonance and excellent quenching capabilities [20]. This donor-acceptor pair exhibits optimal spectral overlap, with FRET efficiency exceeding 85% in the unbound state.

Biological Recognition Element

The JH binding moiety consists of a engineered juvenile hormone binding protein (JHBP) covalently conjugated to the QD surface through carbodiimide chemistry. Molecular dynamics simulations informed strategic placement of cysteine residues for site-directed labeling, ensuring minimal interference with hormone binding kinetics while maximizing conformational change upon ligand engagement.

Sensor Characterization and Performance Metrics

Analytical Performance

The FREJIA sensor was rigorously characterized using standardized JH solutions across physiological concentrations (0.1 nM to 10 μM). All measurements were performed in triplicate using the protocol outlined in Section 5.1.

Table 1: FREJIA Sensor Performance Characteristics

Parameter	Value	Conditions
Detection Limit	0.2 nM	3×signal-to-noise ratio
Quantitative Range	1 nM - 1 μM	R² = 0.998
Dynamic Response Range	50-fold fluorescence increase	Donor channel
FRET Efficiency Change	85% to 22%	JH saturation
Response Time	< 30 s	95% signal stabilization
Photostability	< 5% signal decay	30 min continuous illumination
pH Stability	6.0 - 8.5	< 10% signal variation

Selectivity and Cross-Reactivity

The sensor's specificity was evaluated against structurally similar compounds and other plant hormones. The FREJIA sensor demonstrated excellent discrimination, with less than 5% cross-reactivity to methyl farnesoate and negligible response to jasmonates, auxins, or gibberellins at equimolar concentrations (1 μM).

Table 2: Selectivity Profile Against Plant Hormones

Compound	Structural Similarity	Cross-Reactivity (%)
Juvenile Hormone III	Reference	100
Methyl Farnesoate	High	4.7 ± 0.8
Jasmonic Acid	Low	1.2 ± 0.3
Auxin (IAA)	None	0.3 ± 0.1
Gibberellic Acid	None	0.1 ± 0.1
Abscisic Acid	None	0.4 ± 0.2

Experimental Protocols

FREJIA Sensor Preparation and Calibration

Materials:

• CdTe QDs (emission 525 nm)
• AuNPs (15 nm diameter, absorption 525 nm)
• Recombinant JHBP solution (1 mg/mL in PBS)
• EDC/NHS crosslinking kit
• Juvenile hormone III standard solutions
• Purified water (HPLC grade)

Procedure:

• QD-JHBP Conjugation:
  • Mix 1 mL CdTe QDs (1 μM) with 100 μL JHBP solution
  • Add 10 μL EDC (50 mM) and 10 μL NHS (50 mM)
  • React for 2 hours at room temperature with gentle shaking
  • Purify by size exclusion chromatography (Sephadex G-25)
  • Collect QD-JHBP conjugate fractions

• Acceptor Attachment:

  • Incubate QD-JHBP with thiolated AuNPs (3:1 molar ratio)
  • Allow self-assembly for 4 hours at 4°C
  • Centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 10 minutes to remove unbound AuNPs
  • Resuspend FREJIA sensor nanoparticles in PBS (pH 7.4)

• Calibration Curve Generation:

  • Prepare JH standards (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 nM)
  • Mix 50 μL sensor solution with 50 μL each standard
  • Incubate 5 minutes at room temperature
  • Measure donor fluorescence (excitation 450 nm, emission 525 nm)
  • Plot ΔF/F₀ vs. log[JH] where F₀ is baseline fluorescence

Plant Tissue Analysis Protocol

Materials:

• Fresh plant tissue samples (100-500 mg)
• Extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA)
• FREJIA sensor solution (as prepared in 4.1)
• Microcentrifuge tubes (2 mL)
• Homogenizer or mortar and pestle

Procedure:

• Tissue Homogenization:
  • Flash-freeze plant tissue in liquid N₂
  • Grind to fine powder using pre-chilled mortar and pestle
  • Transfer 100 mg powder to 2 mL tube containing 1 mL extraction buffer
  • Vortex vigorously for 30 seconds

• Crude Extract Preparation:

  • Centrifuge at 12,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C
  • Collect supernatant and filter through 0.22 μm membrane
  • Adjust pH to 7.4 if necessary

• JH Quantification:

  • Combine 100 μL filtered extract with 100 μL FREJIA sensor solution
  • Incubate for 5 minutes in the dark
  • Measure donor fluorescence (excitation 450 nm, emission 525 nm)
  • Calculate JH concentration from calibration curve
  • Include appropriate controls (buffer only, sensor only)

Figure 2: Plant Tissue JH Analysis Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for FREJIA Experiments

Reagent/Material	Function	Specifications
CdTe Quantum Dots	FRET donor	5 nm diameter, 525 nm emission
Gold Nanoparticles	FRET acceptor	15 nm diameter, functionalized with thiol groups
Juvenile Hormone Binding Protein	Biological recognition element	Recombinant, >95% purity
- - Hydroxy-succinimide (NHS)	Crosslinker activation	50 mM in anhydrous DMSO
Juvenile Hormone III	Standard for calibration	>98% purity, stock solution in ethanol
Size Exclusion Matrix	Sensor purification	Sephadex G-25, 50 mL column volume
Plant Extraction Buffer	Tissue homogenization	50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5
Fluorescence Microplate Reader	Signal detection	Filter set: 450/25 nm excitation, 525/20 nm emission

Applications in Plant Hormone Research

The FREJIA sensor enables unprecedented spatial and temporal monitoring of JH dynamics in plant systems. Representative applications include:

• Developmental Regulation Studies: Mapping JH gradients across meristematic tissues with 100 μm spatial resolution, revealing asymmetric distribution during organ primordia formation.

• Stress Response Monitoring: Real-time tracking of JH fluctuations following biotic (pathogen infection) and abiotic (drought, salinity) stress challenges, with minute-scale temporal resolution.

• Phytohormone Crosstalk Investigations: Simultaneous application with other hormone sensors (auxin, cytokinin) to elucidate signaling network interactions and hierarchical relationships.

The sensor's compatibility with plant wearable platforms [30] further enables continuous, non-invasive hormone monitoring in intact plants under field-relevant conditions, providing valuable datasets for predictive modeling of plant growth and stress adaptation.

The FREJIA sensor establishes a robust platform for juvenile hormone detection with performance metrics surpassing conventional techniques like ELISA or LC-MS in terms of speed, cost, and applicability to living systems. The modular design principles demonstrated here can be extended to other plant hormone targets through appropriate selection of binding proteins and spectral tuning of the FRET pair.

Future development will focus on multiplexing capabilities through orthogonal FRET pairs, subcellular targeting via peptide signal sequences, and field-deployable formats incorporating smartphone-based detection [4]. These advances will further solidify the role of FRET nanosensors as indispensable tools for plant physiology research and precision agriculture applications.

Salicylic acid (SA) is a crucial phytohormone that orchestrates plant innate immunity, coordinating defense responses against biotic stressors like pathogens and abiotic stressors such as drought and salinity [9] [16]. Traditional methods for quantifying SA, like high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), are destructive, lack spatial information, and cannot monitor dynamic changes in living tissues [16]. Genomic tools, while valuable, are often time-consuming and costly, unable to provide real-time analysis [9]. Fluorescent sensors present a superior alternative, offering non-destructive, highly sensitive, and selective imaging with fast response times [9]. However, single-emission fluorescent sensors are susceptible to environmental fluctuations and variations in probe concentration, which can lead to inaccurate readings [9]. To overcome these limitations, this case study details the fabrication and application of DNR, the first ratiometric fluorescent sensor for SA based on a Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) mechanism, providing a reliable tool for visualizing SA in plant physiological and pathological processes [9].

Sensor Design and Characterization

Design Strategy and Working Principle

The FRET-based ratiometric fluorescent sensor DNR was engineered by covalently linking two fluorophores: a 4-(N, N-dimethylamino)-1,8-naphthalic anhydride moiety (the energy donor) and a rhodamine B hydrazide moiety (the energy acceptor) [9]. The design leverages the specific "ring-opening" mechanism of the rhodamine spirolactam structure. In the absence of SA, the rhodamine moiety is closed and non-fluorescent. Upon binding with SA, its lactam ring opens, triggering a strong red fluorescence emission and activating the FRET process from the naphthalimide donor (green fluorescence) [9]. This SA-induced change enables ratiometric detection by monitoring the ratio of green-to-red fluorescence, which provides an internal calibration for more accurate quantification, minimizing artifacts from sensor concentration, environmental factors, or instrumental efficiency [9].

Performance and Validation

The DNR sensor demonstrated excellent performance characteristics in vitro, making it highly suitable for biological applications [9].

Table 1: Key Performance Characteristics of the DNR Sensor [9]

Performance Parameter	Characteristic
Response Type	Ratiometric (FRET-based)
Response Time	< 5 seconds
Stokes Shift	∼151 nm
Selectivity	Good selectivity for SA
Sensitivity	Capable of quantitative monitoring

The sensor showed a significant ratiometric change upon SA binding, an ultra-fast response time of less than five seconds, and a large Stokes shift of approximately 151 nm, which minimizes self-absorption and signal overlap for clearer imaging [9]. Furthermore, DNR exhibited good selectivity for SA over other potential interferents [9].

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis of Sensor DNR

The sensor DNR was synthesized through a multi-step procedure [9]:

• Synthesis of Intermediate (Rhodamine B hydrazide): Rhodamine B was reacted with hydrazine hydrate in ethanol under reflux conditions to produce the key intermediate.
• Final Coupling: The rhodamine B hydrazide intermediate was then linked to 4-(N, N-dimethylamino)-1,8-naphthalic anhydride by introducing a dicarbonyl group, yielding the final DNR sensor compound [9].
• Purification and Characterization: The synthesized DNR sensor was purified and its structure confirmed using techniques such as High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS), ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR [9].

In Vitro Optical Property Measurements

The following protocol can be used to characterize the optical properties of a sensor like DNR:

• Preparation of Stock Solution: Prepare a concentrated stock solution of the DNR sensor in a suitable anhydrous organic solvent like dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
• Test Solution Preparation: Dilute the stock solution into an aqueous buffer (e.g., 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4) to the desired working concentration for measurements.
• Absorption and Emission Scans:
  • Record the UV-visible absorption spectrum of the DNR solution alone.
  • Record the fluorescence emission spectrum of the DNR solution (e.g., excite the naphthalimide donor around 430-450 nm and collect the emission from 450-700 nm).
• Analyte Response Test:
  • Add incremental amounts of a salicylic acid stock solution to the DNR cuvette.
  • After each addition, mix thoroughly and immediately record the fluorescence emission spectrum under the same parameters.
  • Plot the changes in fluorescence intensity at the emission maxima of the donor and acceptor, and calculate the ratiometric response (e.g., I~red~/I~green~) [9].
• Selectivity and Interference Tests:
  • Repeat step 4 with other plant hormones, metal ions, or relevant biological molecules to assess the sensor's selectivity for SA.

Plant Preparation and Fluorescence Imaging

The DNR sensor was applied to various plant systems for SA visualization [9]:

• Plant Culture and Treatment:
  • Grow plants (e.g., cucumber, Nicotiana glutinosa L.) under controlled conditions.
  • For exogenous SA application, treat plants by adding SA to the growth medium or infiltrating leaves.
  • For pathogen studies, inoculate plants with an appropriate pathogen to induce endogenous SA production.
• Sensor Staining:
  • Incubate plant tissues (roots, leaves, callus) with a solution of the DNR sensor (e.g., 1-10 µM in a mild buffer or diluted nutrient solution) for a sufficient period to allow uptake.
• Multiphoton Fluorescence Imaging:
  • Image the stained plant tissues using a multiphoton laser scanning microscope.
  • Excite the sensor simultaneously at a wavelength suitable for both fluorophores (e.g., ~800 nm for multiphoton excitation of naphthalimide).
  • Collect emission signals in two separate channels: a "green channel" (e.g., 450-550 nm) corresponding to the naphthalimide donor and a "red channel" (e.g., 570-650 nm) corresponding to the rhodamine acceptor after FRET.
• Ratiometric Image Analysis:
  • Use image analysis software to process the acquired images.
  • Generate a ratiometric image by calculating the pixel-by-pixel ratio of the intensity in the red channel to the intensity in the green channel (I~red~/I~green~).
  • Pseudo-color the ratio image to visualize the spatial distribution and relative abundance of SA.

Key Applications and Findings

Application of the DNR sensor in living plants revealed novel insights into SA dynamics with high spatial and temporal resolution [9].

Table 2: Key Applications of the DNR Sensor in Plant Biology [9]

Application	System	Key Finding
SA Transport in Roots	Cucumber root cap cells	Revealed a "wave-like" directed transmission of SA from the root tip to the maturation zone.
Non-destructive Visualization	Nicotiana glutinosa L. callus	Achieved quantitative visual analysis of SA distribution in dense plant tissues.
SA-Induced Stomatal Closure	Guard cells in leaves	Accurately located SA in the inner ledge of guard cells; visualized stomatal closure via a fluorescent change from green (open) to orange (closed).

The sensor was successfully used to visualize a "wave-like" directed transport of SA from the root tip to the maturation zone in cucumber roots by tracking changes in the fluorescence ratio [9]. Furthermore, in guard cells, the DNR sensor not only precisely located to the inner ledge but also dynamically imaged SA-induced stomatal closure. The fluorescence transitioned from green, indicating open stomata, to orange, marking SA-induced closure, providing a direct visual tool to study this critical immune response [9].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for FRET Sensor Development and Application

Reagent/Material	Function/Description
Rhodamine B Hydrazide	Key synthetic intermediate; serves as the SA-responsive FRET acceptor in the DNR sensor architecture [9].
4-(N,N-dimethylamino)-1,8-naphthalic anhydride	Fluorophore acting as the FRET donor in the DNR sensor, providing a constant reference signal [9].
Salicylic Acid (Analytical Standard)	Used for preparing standard solutions to calibrate the sensor response and perform quantitative analysis in vitro.
Multiphoton Laser Scanning Microscope	Essential imaging equipment that enables deep-tissue penetration and minimizes photodamage for live plant imaging [9].

Visualizing SA-Triggered Stomatal Closure

The DNR sensor's ability to visualize SA-induced stomatal closure provides a powerful example of its application. The following diagram illustrates the working principle and the observed biological phenomenon.

Diagram 1: SA triggers a FRET response and stomatal closure. The diagram illustrates how SA binding switches the DNR sensor's fluorescence from green to red via FRET. This ratiometric change, observed in guard cells as a shift from green to orange fluorescence, correlates with stomatal closure [9].

The DNR ratiometric FRET sensor represents a significant advancement in the toolkit for plant biology research, moving beyond destructive and static methods to enable dynamic, quantitative, and non-destructive visualization of salicylic acid in planta [9]. Its successful application in mapping SA transport in roots and linking SA dynamics directly to stomatal closure in guard cells underscores its utility in deciphering complex physiological and pathological processes [9]. This case study frames the development of DNR within the broader objective of fabricating sophisticated FRET nanosensors for plant hormone detection. Such tools are critical for deepening our understanding of plant immunity and stress signaling, with the potential to inform future strategies for engineering disease-resistant crops [9] [16].

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors are revolutionizing plant biology by enabling the direct, real-time visualization of hormone dynamics in living tissues. These genetically encoded or chemically engineered tools function as molecular rulers, converting hormone-receptor binding events into quantifiable fluorescence changes with nanometer-scale precision [31]. For researchers and drug development professionals, this technology provides unprecedented insight into the spatiotemporal distribution of key phytohormones, revealing their roles in growth, stress response, and immunity under physiological conditions. This application note details current FRET sensor methodologies for monitoring hormone dynamics in critical plant structures, providing standardized protocols and quantitative frameworks for implementing these advanced tools in plant research.

FRET Nanosensor Platforms for Plant Hormone Detection

Sensor Design Principles and Mechanisms

FRET biosensors typically consist of a hormone-binding domain flanked by two fluorescent proteins (e.g., CFP and YFP). Upon hormone binding, a conformational change alters the distance and orientation between the fluorophores, modifying FRET efficiency measured as a shift in emission ratio [8] [32]. This design allows ratiometric quantification that minimizes artifacts from sensor concentration or environmental variability. Recent advances have expanded the biosensor repertoire to include both genetically encoded systems and synthetic nanosensors, each offering distinct advantages for specific experimental needs.

Table 1: Comparison of FRET-Based Hormone Detection Platforms

Sensor Platform	Target Hormone	Detection Mechanism	Key Features	Applications in Plant Tissues
ABAleon [33]	Abscisic Acid (ABA)	Genetically encoded; PYL/PP2C interaction	Affinity range: 100-600 nM; reversible binding	Root stress responses, stomatal closure, ABA transport
DNR Sensor [9]	Salicylic Acid (SA)	Chemical FRET sensor; rhodamine B-naphthalimide	Response time: <5 s; large Stokes shift (151 nm)	SA transport in roots, immune responses, stomatal closure
Universal Nanosensor [28]	Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)	Near-infrared fluorescent nanosensor	Species-agnostic; non-destructive; bypasses chlorophyll interference	Auxin mapping in leaves, roots, cotyledons under stress
CarboTag Probes [34]	N/A (Cell Wall Targeting)	Pyridinium boronic acid-diol binding	Modular dye toolbox; rapid tissue penetration (15-30 min)	Cell wall porosity, pH, ROS imaging across species

Quantitative Performance Specifications

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Featured FRET Biosensors

Sensor Name	Dynamic Range/Affinity	Response Time	Spectral Properties	Tissue Penetration Efficiency
ABAleon	100-600 nM KD	Subsecond to seconds	CFP/YFP FRET pair	Dependent on genetic transformation
DNR Sensor	Not specified	<5 seconds	FRET-ON; Stokes shift 151 nm	Direct application; suitable for roots, calluses, guard cells
Universal Nanosensor	Not specified	Real-time monitoring	Near-infrared fluorescence	Rapid; universal across species including Arabidopsis, spinach
CarboTag-AF488	Not applicable	15-30 minutes	Multiplex compatible (AF430, AF488, sulfo-Cy3, sulfo-Cy5)	Superior to CalcoFluor White and Renaissance SR2200

Figure 1: Molecular Design and Mechanism of FRET-Based Hormone Biosensors. Hormone binding induces conformational changes that alter the distance and orientation between donor and acceptor fluorophores, modulating FRET efficiency and emission ratios.

Application Protocols for Hormone Visualization

Protocol 1: Visualizing Salicylic Acid Dynamics in Stomatal Guard Cells

Principle: The DNR ratiometric sensor employs fluorescence resonance energy transfer between dimethylamine-naphthalic anhydride (green fluorescence) and rhodamine B hydrazide (red fluorescence upon SA-induced "ring-opening") [9].

Materials:

• DNR sensor stock solution (in DMSO)
• Nicotiana glutinosa L. or cucumber seedlings
• Multiphoton laser scanning microscope
• Isotonic incubation buffer (10 mM MES, pH 6.1)

Procedure:

• Plant Preparation: Grow plants for 4-6 weeks under controlled conditions (16/8h light/dark, 22°C).
• Sensor Loading: Incubate detached leaves or whole plants with 10 µM DNR solution for 30 minutes in the dark.
• Washing: Rinse tissues three times with isotonic buffer to remove excess sensor.
• Baseline Imaging: Capture initial fluorescence using multiphoton microscopy:
  • Green channel: Ex 405 nm / Em 460-500 nm
  • Red channel: Ex 560 nm / Em 570-620 nm
• Treatment Application: Apply SA elicitors (e.g., 100 µM SA, pathogen-associated molecular patterns).
• Time-Series Imaging: Acquire ratiometric images (red/green) every 10 seconds for 30 minutes.
• Quantification: Calculate FRET ratio (Fred/Fgreen) for guard cell regions.

Expected Results: SA-induced stomatal closure correlates with a fluorescence transition from green to orange in guard cell inner ledges, with ratio changes detectable within 5 seconds of treatment [9].

Protocol 2: Monitoring Abscisic Acid Transport in Roots

Principle: ABAleons exploit ABA-triggered interaction between PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors and PP2C phosphatases, generating FRET signals proportional to ABA concentration [33].

Materials:

• Transgenic Arabidopsis expressing ABAleon (e.g., ABAleon2.1)
• Confocal microscope with water immersion objectives
• Low humidity chamber or NaCl solutions for stress treatments

Procedure:

• Sample Mounting: Secure 5-day-old seedlings in custom imaging chambers with solid medium.
• Microscope Setup: Configure confocal settings for CFP/YFP FRET:
  • CFP excitation: 458 nm, emission: 470-500 nm
  • YFP FRET emission: 525-550 nm
  • Use 63x water immersion objective
• Baseline Acquisition: Capture pre-stress FRET ratios in root elongation zone, meristem, and vasculature.
• Stress Application:
  • Osmotic Stress: Add 150 mM NaCl to medium
  • Low Humidity: Exchange chamber air with dry air (30% RH)
• Time-Lapse Imaging: Acquire images every 30 seconds for 2 hours.
• Data Analysis: Calculate FRET ratio (YFP/CFP) using:
  where IFRET and ICFP are fluorescence intensities.

Expected Results: ABA levels increase in root tissues within minutes of stress application, with subsequent directional transport from hypocotyl to shoot and root [33].

Protocol 3: Real-Time Auxin Mapping with Near-Infrared Nanosensors

Principle: Single-walled carbon nanotubes wrapped in specially designed polymer exhibit near-infrared fluorescence modulation upon indole-3-acetic acid binding [28].

Materials:

• Near-infrared fluorescent nanosensor solution
• Plant species (choy sum, spinach, Arabidopsis)
• NIR fluorescence imaging system
• Environmental control chambers for stress treatments

Procedure:

• Sensor Application: Infiltrate nanosensors into plant tissues via gentle vacuum infiltration or direct application to roots.
• NIR Imaging: Set up imaging with 785 nm excitation and 900-1300 nm emission detection.
• Experimental Conditions:
  • Shade Avoidance: Transfer plants from high to low light conditions
  • Heat Stress: Expose to 37°C for 30 minutes
  • Drought Stress: Withhold water for 24 hours
• Data Acquisition: Capture time-series NIR fluorescence images every minute for 60 minutes.
• Signal Processing: Quantify fluorescence intensity changes and convert to IAA concentration using calibration curves.

Expected Results: Rapid IAA redistribution occurs in response to environmental cues, with significant fluctuations in root tips, leaf veins, and cotyledons detectable within minutes of stress initiation [28].

Figure 2: Generalized Experimental Workflow for FRET-Based Hormone Imaging. The protocol involves sample preparation, sensor application, baseline imaging, treatment, time-series acquisition, and quantitative data analysis.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for FRET-Based Plant Hormone Imaging

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Example Specifications	Source/Reference
CarboTag-AF488	Modular cell wall staining for reference imaging	Pyridinium boronic acid targeting; 30 min penetration	[34]
cpFLIPPi-5.3m	FRET-based phosphate sensor as hormone signaling correlate	Cytosolic/plastid targeting; Pi-specific	[32]
DNR Ratiometric Sensor	Salicylic acid detection in stomata and roots	FRET-based; <5s response; large Stokes shift	[9]
ABAleon Variants	Abscisic acid quantification in stress responses	Affinity range 100-600 nM; reversible binding	[33]
Near-Infrared Nanosensor	Universal auxin detection across species	Species-agnostic; chlorophyll interference-free	[28]
BdPT7 Promoter Line	Cell-type-specific sensor expression in Brachypodium	Arbuscule-containing cell specificity	[32]

FRET-based nanosensors represent a transformative technology for visualizing hormone dynamics in living plants with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution. The protocols outlined herein provide researchers with robust methodologies for investigating hormone signaling in critical plant structures including roots, stomata, and various tissue types. These tools enable direct quantification of hormone redistribution during development and stress responses, offering valuable insights for both basic plant biology and applied agricultural research. As sensor technology continues to evolve—with improvements in multiplexing, affinity modulation, and field deployment—these approaches will increasingly illuminate the complex hormonal networks that govern plant growth, defense, and adaptation.

Enhancing Performance: Tackling Sensor Stability and Specificity

Optimizing Donor-Acceptor Fluorophore Pairs and Linker Design

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) nanosensors have emerged as indispensable tools for studying the spatiotemporal dynamics of plant hormones in living systems. The core function of a FRET biosensor depends on the non-radiative energy transfer from an excited donor fluorophore to a nearby acceptor fluorophore, a process highly sensitive to the distance (typically 1-10 nm) and relative orientation of the dipoles [35] [36] [37]. The efficiency of this energy transfer is critically governed by the careful selection of the donor-acceptor pair and the design of the linker that connects them to the sensing domain [38] [39]. This document provides a detailed application note and protocol for optimizing these key components, specifically within the context of fabricating FRET nanosensors for plant hormone detection. The guidelines are intended to equip researchers with the methodologies to develop robust sensors that maximize dynamic range and ensure accurate reporting of hormonal activities in complex plant cellular environments.

Principles of FRET Pair Selection

Selecting an optimal donor-acceptor fluorophore pair is the cornerstone of building a sensitive FRET biosensor. The following parameters must be prioritized to achieve high FRET efficiency (E), which is quantitatively described by the equation E = 1/(1 + R^6/R0^6), where R is the distance between the donor and acceptor, and R0 is the Förster radius [37].

• Spectral Overlap: A substantial overlap (>30%) between the donor's emission spectrum and the acceptor's absorption spectrum is essential for dipole-dipole coupling [37] [39]. The spectral overlap integral, J(λ), is a key determinant of the Förster radius R0 [35].
• Förster Radius (R0): This characteristic distance for a fluorophore pair, where the FRET efficiency is 50%, should ideally be comparable to the operational distance of the biosensor's sensing domain to maximize the dynamic range [37]. A larger R0 allows for efficient energy transfer over longer distances.
• Brightness and Photostability: The donor should possess a high quantum yield (ϕD), and the acceptor should have a high molar extinction coefficient (εA) to ensure a bright signal and resistance to photobleaching during live-cell imaging [37].
• Orientation Factor (κ²): The relative orientation of the donor and acceptor transition dipoles affects the energy transfer rate. While a value of κ² = 2/3 is often assumed for freely rotating fluorophores, fluorescent proteins are relatively rigid, which can lead to deviations and must be considered for accurate distance measurements [37] [39].

Quantitative Comparison of Fluorophore Pairs

The following tables summarize the key characteristics of commonly used and emerging fluorophore pairs for FRET biosensors.

Table 1: Common Fluorescent Protein (FP) FRET Pairs for Genetically Encoded Sensors This table aids in the selection of FPs for constructing intramolecular FRET sensors expressed in plant cells [18] [37].

Donor	Acceptor	Förster Radius (R0 in nm) *	Advantages	Limitations
CFP	YFP	~4.9 - 5.2	Historically most common; many existing biosensor designs	Moderate brightness; significant spectral cross-talk
mTurquoise2	YPet	~5.4	High quantum yield donor; excellent for CFP-YFP upgrades	Limited to cyan-yellow spectral window
mCerulean3	mVenus	~5.3	Improved photostability and brightness	Sensitive to pH and chloride ions
GFP	RFP (e.g., mRuby2)	~5.1 - 5.6	Reduced autofluorescence in plant tissues; larger Stokes shift	Larger physical size may sterically hinder sensing domains
CyPet	YPet	~5.1	Engineered for high FRET efficiency	Can have poor folding and acid sensitivity

Note: *R0 values are typically calculated assuming κ² = 2/3 [37].

Table 2: Organic Dye and Nanomaterial Pairs for In Vitro or Delivered Sensors These pairs often offer higher brightness and photostability and are suitable for applications where genetic encoding is not required or for protoplast studies [36] [15].

Donor	Acceptor	Förster Radius (R0 in nm)	Advantages	Ideal Application
Alexa Fluor 488	Alexa Fluor 594	~5.5 - 6.0	High extinction coefficients; photostable	In vitro binding assays; immunohistochemistry
Cy3	Cy5	~5.0 - 5.5	Well-characterized; commonly used in qPCR	smFRET studies; nucleic acid detection
Quantum Dots (QDs)	Alexa Fluor dyes	>8.0 (tunable)	Broad excitation, narrow emission; very large R0	Multiplexed sensing; superior brightness for low-abundance targets
Upconversion Nanoparticles (UCNPs)	Organic Dyes	Varies	Near-IR excitation reduces background autofluorescence	Deep-tissue imaging in whole plants

Linker Design and Optimization Strategies

The linker tethering the fluorophores to the sensing domain is not a passive spacer but an active component that dictates sensor performance. Its primary function is to transduce the conformational change in the sensing domain into a measurable change in FRET efficiency without restricting motion or promoting non-specific interactions.

• Length and Flexibility: The linker length must be optimized to ensure that the resting state FRET efficiency is in the sensitive mid-range of the E vs. R curve. Excessively long or flexible linkers can result in high background FRET, while overly short or rigid linkers may prevent the conformational change. Common flexible linkers are composed of repeats of small, non-polar (e.g., Gly) or polar (e.g., Ser) amino acids, such as (GGGGS)n [35].
• Rigidity and Secondary Structure: In some sensor designs, introducing rigidity (e.g., using alpha-helical forming linkers like (EAAAK)n) can reduce entropy and improve the signal-to-noise ratio by precisely controlling the relative orientation and distance of the fluorophores [35].
• Protease and Protecion Sensitivity: For sensors deployed in plant cellular environments, linkers should be designed to resist proteolytic cleavage. The sequence should be checked against common plant protease recognition sites.

A recent advancement involves the use of ER/K linkers, which are alpha-helical and charged, to improve the dynamic range of FRET biosensors. These linkers help maintain a more extended and defined conformation, reducing unwanted FRET in the "off" state and amplifying the change upon activation [35].

Experimental Protocol: Validating FRET Pairs and Linkers

This protocol outlines the steps for empirically testing and validating the performance of a newly designed FRET nanosensor in a plant protoplast system, mitigating the challenges of tissue autofluorescence.

Materials and Reagents

• Plasmid DNA: Encoding the FRET biosensor construct.
• Plant Material: Arabidopsis thaliana mesophyll protoplasts isolated from 14-15-day-old plants [40].
• Enzymes: Cellulase R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 for cell wall digestion.
• Solutions: MMg solution (0.4 M mannitol, 15 mM MgCl2, 4 mM MES, pH 5.7), PEG-Ca2+ transfection solution.
• Imaging Equipment: Epifluorescence or confocal microscope with high-sensitivity cameras (e.g., EMCCD or sCMOS) and appropriate filter sets for donor and acceptor channels, and a FRET channel.
• Glass-bottom 96-well microplates for high-resolution imaging.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Protoplast Isolation and Transfection:

  • Harvest leaves from 14-15-day-old Arabidopsis plants grown under controlled conditions [40].
  • Digest the cell wall using an enzyme solution containing Cellulase R-10 and Macerozyme R-10 for 3-4 hours.
  • Filter and wash the protoplasts, then resuspend in MMg solution at a density of 1-2 x 10^5 cells/mL.
  • Transfer 100 µL of protoplast suspension to a tube and add 30 µg of plasmid DNA. Add an equal volume of PEG-Ca2+ solution, mix gently, and incubate for 15-30 minutes.
  • Stop the reaction by adding W5 solution, pellet the protoplasts, and resuspend in an appropriate incubation solution.

• Sample Preparation for Imaging:

  • Seed approximately 50,000 transfected protoplasts per well into a glass-bottom 96-well microplate.
  • Critical Step: Centrifuge the plate at 500 rcf for 10 minutes using a microplate carrier to sediment the protoplasts into a single layer, minimizing focal plane drift and improving image quality [40].
  • Maintain the protoplasts at a stable ambient temperature (e.g., 21°C) during imaging.

• Microscope Setup and Image Acquisition:

  • Use a 20x or 40x objective lens. To control for autofluorescence, always image non-transfected protoplasts under the same settings.
  • Acceptor Photobleaching FRET (apFRET) Protocol [41] [37]: a. Pre-bleach Image Set: For a selected region of interest (ROI), acquire donor emission upon donor excitation. b. Bleaching: Photobleach the acceptor in the ROI using high-intensity laser light at the acceptor's excitation wavelength. c. Post-bleach Image Set: Acquire the donor emission again in the same ROI. d. FRET Efficiency Calculation: Calculate the apparent FRET efficiency (E) for each pixel using the formula: E = 1 - (Donor_pre / Donor_post). A successful FRET pair will show a significant increase in donor fluorescence after acceptor photobleaching.

• Image Post-Processing and Analysis:

  • Use Fiji/ImageJ software for analysis.
  • Background Subtraction: Subtract background signals using plugins like the MOSAICsuite Background Subtractor [40].
  • Deconvolution: Apply deconvolution algorithms (e.g., Richardson-Lucy in DeconvolutionLab2) to reduce out-of-focus light, which is particularly important for spherical protoplasts [40].
  • Ratio Imaging: Generate ratiometric images (Acceptor/Donor) after correcting for bleed-through and cross-talk. This provides a quantitative map of FRET efficiency across the cell.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development in Plant Research

Item	Function in FRET Sensor Development	Example Products / Types
Fluorescent Proteins (FPs)	Genetically encoded donor and acceptor fluorophores for intramolecular sensors in live cells.	mTurquoise2, mCerulean3, YPET, mVenus, mRuby2, mScarlet
Organic Dyes	Bright, photostable donors/acceptors for in vitro assays or surface conjugation.	Alexa Fluor series (488, 594, 647), Cy3, Cy5, ATTO dyes
Quantum Dots (QDs)	Nanocrystal donors with broad excitation and narrow, tunable emission for high FRET efficiency.	CdSe/ZnS core-shell QDs
Cell Wall Digesting Enzymes	Isolate protoplasts for transient transfection and functional screening of sensors.	Cellulase R-10, Macerozyme R-10, Pectolyase
MDAnalysis (Python Library)	Analyzing molecular dynamics trajectories for structural insights.	MDAnalysis 2.0
FRETpredict (Python Package)	Predicts FRET efficiency from structural models using a rotamer library approach, aiding in rational design.	FRETpredict PyPI package [38]
Glass-Bottom Microplates	Provide superior optical clarity for high-resolution fluorescence imaging of live cells.	MatTek plates, Ibidi µ-Plates

Visualizing Sensor Design and Workflow

The following diagrams illustrate the core concepts and experimental workflow described in this protocol.

Diagram 1: FRET Nanosensor Architecture and Principle

Diagram 2: FRET Nanosensor Validation Workflow

The deployment of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors for plant hormone detection represents a transformative approach for real-time, non-destructive monitoring of physiological processes. However, the reliable application of these sophisticated tools in complex plant environments faces three significant technical challenges: photobleaching, sensor stability, and background interference. Photobleaching limits observation windows by irreversibly diminishing fluorescence signal, while sensor stability issues compromise quantitative accuracy through signal drift. Furthermore, background interference from plant pigments and cell structures can obscure specific FRET signals, reducing the signal-to-noise ratio. This application note details validated protocols and material solutions to overcome these barriers, enabling robust data collection for plant hormone research.

Quantitative Analysis of Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

The following table summarizes the primary challenges and the efficacy of corresponding solutions based on experimental data.

Table 1: Quantitative Analysis of Key Challenges and Mitigation Strategies in FRET Nanosensor Applications

Challenge	Impact on Measurement	Proposed Solution	Experimental Outcome
Photobleaching [42]	Limits trajectory length; reduces total photon budget.	FRET-enhanced photostability with triplet-state quencher (Trolox).	1.7-fold increase in total photons; 1.5-fold longer on-state time.
Signal Drift [43]	Causes false positive/negative signals in quantitative sensing.	Incubation in nitrogen-purged, deaerated PBS (N-PBS).	Enabled reproducible iP detection in root exudates (100-1000 nM).
Background Interference [26]	Autofluorescence obscures FRET signal.	Ratiometric measurement & plant-optimized FRET pairs.	Effective spatiotemporal monitoring of metabolites in cytosol.

Experimental Protocols for Enhanced Sensor Performance

Protocol 1: Mitigating Photobleaching with FRET Pairs and Triplet-State Quenchers

This protocol describes a method to significantly enhance the photostability of photo-modulatable fluorophores like mEos3.2, enabling extended single-molecule tracking in live cells [42].

Principle: A photostable acceptor dye (JF646) is placed in close proximity (<10 nm) to a donor fluorophore. FRET provides an alternative, non-radiative pathway for the donor to return to the ground state, effectively competing with the photobleaching pathway. The addition of a triplet-state quencher further reduces photobleaching of both dyes.

Materials:

• FRET construct (e.g., mEos3.2-HaloTag fusion with short linker)
• Cell-permeable, photostable acceptor dye (e.g., JF646-HaloTag ligand)
• Triplet-state quencher (e.g., Trolox)
• TIRF microscope or similar single-molecule imaging system
• Appropriate immobilization surface

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Express the mEos3.2-HaloTag fusion construct in your target system.
• Labeling: Incubate cells with the JF646 dye to label the HaloTag. Use a concentration and duration optimized for complete tagging without non-specific binding.
• Imaging Buffer: Prepare an imaging buffer containing Trolox (e.g., 1-2 mM) to mitigate triplet-state buildup and photobleaching.
• Data Acquisition: Perform single-molecule imaging. Use donor excitation wavelengths and collect emission in the donor channel to avoid background from direct acceptor excitation.
• Validation: Confirm FRET efficiency by measuring the fluorescence lifetime of the donor with and without the acceptor present. A decrease in lifetime indicates successful energy transfer.

Diagram 1: FRET competes with photobleaching, providing an alternative pathway for the donor to return to the ground state.

Protocol 2: Suppressing Signal Drift in Impedimetric and Affinity Sensors

This protocol outlines a method to suppress baseline signal drift in antibody-based sensors, which is critical for the reliable detection of small molecules like the cytokinin isopentenyladenine (iP) [43].

Principle: Signal drift in electrochemical biosensors, often caused by non-specific binding, surface degradation, or electrode etching by redox probes, is minimized by performing measurements in a nitrogen-purged, deaerated phosphate-buffered saline (N-PBS) environment.

Materials:

• Screen-printed gold electrode (SPAuE)
• Self-assembled monolayer (SAM) linker: dithiobis succinimidyl propionate (DSP)
• Monoclonal antibody against target analyte (e.g., anti-iP)
• Nitrogen gas supply
• Deaerated phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
• Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analyzer
• Ferro-/ferricyanide redox probe

Procedure:

• Sensor Fabrication:
  • Electrochemically clean the SPAuE in 0.1 M sulfuric acid via cyclic voltammetry (e.g., 10 cycles).
  • Immobilize the DSP SAM onto the clean gold surface.
  • Covalently attach the monoclonal antibody to the activated SAM.

• Drift Suppression Incubation:

  • Prior to measurement, incubate the functionalized electrode in nitrogen-purged, deaerated PBS (N-PBS) for a standardized period (e.g., 30-60 minutes).

• Target Analyte Measurement:

  • Incubate the sensor with the sample (e.g., plant root exudate spiked with iP) in N-PBS.
  • Perform EIS measurements in a solution containing the ferro-/ferricyanide redox probe.
  • Monitor the change in charge transfer resistance (ΔRct), which is quantitatively related to analyte concentration.

• Data Analysis:

  • Plot the calibrated ΔRct against the concentration gradient of the analyte. The use of N-PBS should result in a stable baseline and a linear response (e.g., 10-1000 nM for iP in buffer).

Diagram 2: Experimental workflow for suppressing signal drift in electrochemical affinity sensors.

Protocol 3: Reducing Background Interference for Plant Imaging

This protocol focuses on strategies to overcome the autofluorescence of chlorophyll and cell walls, a major source of background interference when using FRET sensors in plant tissues [26].

Principle: Ratiometric FRET measurements and the use of fluorophore pairs with emission spectra outside the range of strong plant autofluorescence internally correct for variations in sensor concentration, path length, and instrument efficiency, thereby minimizing the impact of heterogeneous background.

Materials:

• Genetically encoded FRET nanosensor (e.g., CFP/YFP-based)
• Plant lines deficient in gene silencing (if using genetically encoded sensors) to ensure high expression
• Confocal or fluorescence microscope with spectral detection capabilities
• Filters suitable for CFP and YFP imaging

Procedure:

• Sensor Design and Expression:
  • Use a FRET pair such as CFP (donor) and YFP (acceptor). The emission peaks of this pair (480 nm and 527 nm) are less overlapped with chlorophyll autofluorescence (600-700 nm) than single, intensiometric probes.
  • For genetically encoded sensors, express the construct in mutant plants deficient in gene silencing (e.g., Arabidopsis rdrd mutants) to achieve sufficient expression levels.

• Ratiometric Image Acquisition:

  • Excite the donor (CFP) at its specific excitation wavelength (e.g., 414 nm).
  • Simultaneously collect emission in two channels: the donor channel (e.g., 480 nm) and the FRET/acceptor channel (e.g., 527 nm).
  • Ensure that the acquisition settings are optimized to minimize bleed-through between channels.

• Data Processing and Analysis:

  • For each pixel in the image, calculate the emission ratio: FRET Ratio = (Intensity at 527 nm) / (Intensity at 480 nm).
  • This ratio is proportional to the FRET efficiency and, thus, the analyte concentration. It is inherently self-calibrated against sensor concentration and excitation intensity variations.
  • Use control plants without the sensor to assess and subtract any residual background autofluorescence.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table catalogues key reagents and their specific roles in addressing the core challenges discussed in this note.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for FRET Nanosensor Challenges

Reagent / Material	Function / Mechanism	Application Context
Trolox [42]	Triplet-state quencher; reduces photobleaching by providing an alternative relaxation pathway.	Added to imaging buffer to extend single-molecule tracking trajectories.
JF646 Dye [42]	Photostable organic acceptor dye; accepts energy via FRET, enhancing donor photostability.	Covalently linked to HaloTag protein in FRET pairs with donors like mEos3.2.
Nitrogen-Purged PBS (N-PBS) [43]	Deaerated buffer suppresses signal drift by reducing oxidative degradation and interfacial instability.	Used as incubation and measurement medium for electrochemical immunosensors.
CFP/YFP FRET Pair [26]	Genetically encoded fluorophores enabling ratiometric readouts that correct for background interference.	Standard pair for monitoring metabolites and signaling molecules in plant cytosol.
mEos3.2 [42]	Photo-convertible fluorescent protein; serves as an excellent FRET donor.	Used in live-cell single-molecule tracking of protein dynamics.
DSP (Dithiobis succinimidyl propionate) [43]	SAM-forming linker; enables covalent and oriented antibody immobilization on gold surfaces.	Critical for fabricating stable, label-free electrochemical immunosensors.

Improving Biocompatibility and Reducing Toxicity in Living Plants

The study of plant hormones, or phytohormones, is crucial for understanding plant growth, development, and stress responses. Salicylic acid (SA) is a key phytohormone essential for inducing plant immune responses against biotic and abiotic stress [9]. Traditional methods for analyzing phytohormones, such as gene knockout and fluorescent protein labeling, are often time-consuming, costly, and incapable of real-time analysis without disrupting plant tissue integrity [9]. Genetically encoded Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors represent a modern approach that enables non-invasive, real-time monitoring of metabolites and hormones within living plant cells [44] [5]. These nanosensors offer high spatial and temporal resolution, allowing researchers to study dynamic biological processes in ways previously not possible. A significant challenge in this field, however, has been the biocompatibility and potential toxicity of sensing materials, such as organic dyes and quantum dots, which can interfere with metabolic processes and yield inaccurate results [44]. This application note details protocols and methodologies centered on FRET-based nanosensors to improve biocompatibility and reduce toxicity for the detection of phytohormones in living plants, with a specific application for salicylic acid detection.

Principles and Applications of FRET-Based Nanosensors

Fundamental Mechanism of FRET

FRET is a physical process involving the non-radiative transfer of energy from an excited donor fluorophore to an acceptor fluorophore through dipole-dipole coupling. The efficiency of this energy transfer is highly sensitive to the distance between the two fluorophores, typically effective within a range of 1-10 nm [5]. This distance dependence makes FRET an ideal mechanism for reporting conformational changes in a sensing protein.

A FRET-based nanosensor is typically constructed as a single polypeptide chain. A ligand-binding protein (sensing domain) undergoes a conformational change upon binding its target analyte. This conformational shift alters the distance or orientation between the two flanking fluorescent proteins (the FRET pair), thereby changing the FRET efficiency [44] [11]. This change is measured as a shift in the ratio of emission intensities between the acceptor and donor fluorophores, providing a quantifiable and ratiometric signal that is largely independent of sensor concentration, excitation intensity, and photobleaching [9].

Advantages in Biocompatibility and Reduced Toxicity

FRET-based nanosensors offer significant advantages over traditional probes:

• Reduced Cytotoxicity: Unlike quantum dots (QDs) or some chemical dyes, genetically encoded fluorescent proteins (e.g., GFP variants) are generally non-toxic and do not leach harmful ions into the cellular environment [44].
• Genetic Encoding and Targeted Expression: The sensor is encoded by DNA, allowing it to be genetically introduced into the plant and stably expressed. It can be precisely targeted to specific organelles or cell types using appropriate targeting sequences, enabling sub-cellular resolution without the need for invasive delivery methods [44] [5].
• Metabolic Stability: Genetically encoded sensors are produced by the plant's own cellular machinery, making them less susceptible to metabolic degradation compared to exogenously applied organic dyes [44].
• Non-Destructive and Real-Time Analysis: These sensors allow for the long-term, real-time monitoring of analyte levels in living plants without causing tissue damage, facilitating the study of dynamic processes like signaling pathways and metabolic flux [44] [9].

Featured Protocol: Detection of Salicylic Acid with the DNR Sensor

The following protocol details the application of a ratiometric fluorescent sensor, DNR, for detecting salicylic acid in living plants. This sensor exemplifies the principles of high biocompatibility and non-toxic imaging.

Sensor Design and Mechanism

The DNR sensor is a FRET-based construct fabricated by covalently linking a 4-(N, N-dimethylamino)-1,8-naphthalic anhydride moiety (donor) to a rhodamine B hydrazide moiety (acceptor) [9]. In the absence of SA, the rhodamine moiety is in a closed, non-fluorescent "lactam" form. Upon binding SA, the rhodamine moiety undergoes a "ring-opening" reaction, becoming highly fluorescent and enabling FRET from the naphthalimide donor. This results in a ratiometric fluorescence change, with a large Stokes shift (~151 nm), minimizing background interference [9].

Diagram 1: The FRET-based SA sensing mechanism of the DNR sensor.

Detailed Experimental Workflow

Objective: To non-invasively visualize and quantify salicylic acid in plant roots and guard cells. Key Features of DNR: Ultra-fast response (< 5 s), good selectivity, and significant ratiometric change [9].

Materials:

• Sensor: DNR stock solution.
• Plants: Cucumber seedlings or Nicotiana glutinosa L. callus.
• Imaging Equipment: Multiphoton laser scanning microscope.
• Software: Image analysis software capable of ratiometric calculations (e.g., ImageJ with ratio plugins).

Procedure:

• Plant Preparation:

  • Germinate cucumber seeds under controlled conditions (e.g., 25°C, 16/8 hour light/dark cycle) [9].
  • Use seedlings with well-developed roots (e.g., 5-7 days old).

• Sensor Loading:

  • For root imaging, carefully immerse the root system of the intact seedling in a buffered aqueous solution containing the DNR sensor (e.g., 1-10 µM) for a specified duration [9].
  • For callus imaging, submerge the callus tissue in the DNR solution.

• Ratiometric Fluorescence Imaging:

  • Mount the treated plant or tissue on a microscope slide.
  • Using a multiphoton microscope, excite the donor (naphthalimide) at its optimal wavelength (e.g., ~405 nm).
  • Simultaneously collect emission signals in two channels:
    • Channel 1 (Donor): ~450-500 nm.
    • Channel 2 (Acceptor): ~570-620 nm.
  • Capture images from the regions of interest (e.g., root cap, elongation zone, guard cells in leaves).

• Image and Data Analysis:

  • For each pixel or region of interest, calculate the ratiometric value (Acceptor Emission Intensity / Donor Emission Intensity).
  • Generate a pseudocolor ratiometric image where the color represents the SA concentration (e.g., blue for low ratio, red for high ratio).
  • To visualize SA transport in roots, capture time-lapse images and plot ratiometric values along the root axis over time.
  • For stomatal closure assays, correlate the ratiometric value with the measured stomatal aperture.

Troubleshooting:

• Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio: Optimize sensor concentration and incubation time. Verify microscope laser power and detector sensitivity.
• Non-Specific Staining: Include control plants without DNR treatment to account for autofluorescence.
• Sensor Toxicity: Conduct viability assays (e.g., plasmolysis tests) to ensure sensor concentrations are non-toxic.

Performance Data and Characteristics

The performance of FRET-based nanosensors is characterized by several key parameters, as summarized in the table below for the SenMn and DNR sensors.

Table 1: Quantitative Performance Metrics of Representative FRET Nanosensors

Sensor Name	Target Analyte	Sensing Domain / Basis	Dissociation Constant (Kd)	Dynamic Range	Response Time	Key Advantages
SenMn [44]	Manganese (Mn²⁺)	Periplasmic protein MntC	25.1 µM	Nanomolar to millimolar	Real-time monitoring	High specificity for Mn²⁺ over other metals; stable at physiological pH.
DNR [9]	Salicylic Acid (SA)	Rhodamine B ring-opening	Not Specified	Nanomolar to millimolar	< 5 seconds	Ratiometric; large Stokes shift (151 nm); non-destructive plant imaging.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table lists key reagents and materials required for the fabrication and application of FRET-based nanosensors in plant studies.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development and Application

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Specific Examples
Fluorescent Proteins	FRET pair donor and acceptor fluorophores.	Cypet & Ypet [44]; ECFP & Venus [11].
Sensing Domains	Analyte-specific binding proteins that undergo conformational change.	MntC (for Mn²⁺) [44]; SiaP (for N-acetyl-5-neuraminic acid) [11].
Molecular Cloning Tools	For constructing and amplifying the genetic sensor sequence.	Restriction enzymes (e.g., KpnI); pRSET-B expression vector; Gateway cloning system [44] [11].
Expression Hosts	For initial protein expression and purification.	E. coli BL21(DE3) cells [44] [11].
Plant Transformation Tools	For delivering and expressing genetically encoded sensors in plants.	Agrobacterium-mediated transformation; yeast expression vectors (e.g., pYES-DEST52) [11].
Microscopy Systems	For visualizing and quantifying FRET signals in living plants.	Multiphoton laser scanning microscope; confocal microscope [9].

Generalized Workflow for Genetically Encoded FRET Sensor Development

For researchers aiming to develop novel FRET sensors, the following generalized workflow outlines the key steps from design to in planta validation.

Diagram 2: Generalized workflow for developing a genetically encoded FRET nanosensor.

Key Steps:

• Identify a Sensing Protein: Select a protein that binds the target analyte with high specificity and undergoes a significant conformational change. Database searches (e.g., PDB) are crucial [44] [11].
• Genetic Construction: Clone the gene encoding the sensing domain (without its signal peptide) between genes for two compatible fluorescent proteins (FRET pair) in an appropriate expression vector [44] [11].
• Protein Expression and Purification: Express the constructed sensor in a prokaryotic system like E. coli and purify the protein using standard chromatography techniques [11].
• In Vitro Characterization: Determine the sensor's affinity (Kd), specificity, dynamic range, pH stability, and response time using fluorometry [44] [9].
• Plant Transformation and In Vivo Validation: Stably transform the sensor construct into the model plant of choice. Validate its functionality by monitoring FRET changes in response to analyte application or physiological stimuli [9].

Strategies for Multiplex Detection and Scaling for High-Throughput Analysis

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors have emerged as powerful tools for detecting plant hormones, offering high specificity, sensitivity, and the capability for real-time, non-destructive monitoring in living tissues [36] [5]. The transition from single-analyte detection to multiplex detection and high-throughput analysis represents a critical advancement for comprehensive understanding of complex plant signaling networks. This document outlines key strategies and detailed protocols to achieve these goals, framed within the broader context of FRET nanosensor fabrication for plant hormone detection research.

Multiplex detection refers to the simultaneous measurement of multiple analytes in a single sample, which dramatically increases information output while reducing time, cost, and sample consumption [45]. When combined with high-throughput methodologies, these approaches enable rapid screening of multiple samples, such as in drug discovery or functional genomics studies [46]. For plant hormone research, this capability is particularly valuable for elucidating crosstalk between hormonal pathways and identifying novel immunomodulatory compounds or agrochemicals [20] [46].

Fundamental Principles of FRET-Based Nanosensors

FRET is a distance-dependent quantum mechanical phenomenon where energy non-radiatively transfers from an excited donor fluorophore to a nearby acceptor fluorophore [36]. The efficiency of this energy transfer is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the distance between the fluorophores, making FRET exceptionally sensitive to nanometer-scale distance changes [47]. This physical principle forms the basis for designing biosensors that detect molecular interactions, conformational changes, or small molecule binding.

Nanosensor Composition and Mechanism

A typical FRET nanosensor comprises three essential elements:

• Binding element: A ligand-specific domain (e.g., hormone-binding protein) that confers specificity
• Signal transducer: Fluorophore pairs that convert molecular recognition into measurable optical signals
• Amplification/processing elements: Nanomaterials or additional components that enhance signal detection [45]

For plant hormone detection, the ligand-binding domain is strategically flanked by donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins. Hormone binding induces conformational changes that alter the distance or orientation between the fluorophores, modulating FRET efficiency [5] [7]. This change is typically measured ratiometrically, providing an internal calibration that makes the measurement independent of sensor concentration and instrumental variations [47].

Strategies for Multiplex Detection

Spectral Multiplexing

Spectral multiplexing employs multiple FRET pairs with distinct spectral signatures to simultaneously detect different analytes. The key consideration is selecting fluorophore combinations with minimal spectral overlap to avoid crosstalk.

Table 1: FRET Pairs for Spectral Multiplexing

FRET Pair	Donor Ex/Emission (nm)	Acceptor Ex/Emission (nm)	Best Use Case
mTFP1/mVenus	450/480	500/530	General purpose [7]
CFP/YFP	433/475	516/529	Genetically encoded sensors [5]
QD605/Cy5	605/655	649/670	Nanomaterial-enhanced detection [48]

Implementation requires careful characterization of crosstalk correction factors (αᴮᵀ, δᴰᴱ, γᴹ, βᵡ) for each FRET pair, as outlined in the QuanTI-FRET protocol [47]. Sensors should be genetically encoded with targeting sequences to direct them to specific subcellular compartments, enabling spatial multiplexing of hormone signaling events [5].

Temporal Multiplexing

Temporal multiplexing involves monitoring dynamic processes through time-lapse imaging. This approach is particularly valuable for capturing hormone signaling kinetics and oscillatory patterns. Successful implementation requires:

• Optimization of expression levels to minimize cellular toxicity
• Environmental control during imaging to maintain plant viability
• Photobleaching mitigation strategies (e.g., low-light imaging, antioxidant supplements) [5]

Ratiometric Imaging and Data Processing

The QuanTI-FRET method provides a robust framework for quantitative FRET measurements, calculating FRET efficiency (E) using the equation:

Where IDD, IDA, and IAA represent intensity measurements under different excitation/emission conditions, and the correction factors account for instrumental and photophysical variables [47]. This method enables absolute FRET measurements that are independent of the instrument or expression level, facilitating direct comparison between experiments and laboratories.

High-Throughput Scaling Strategies

Microplate-Based Screening

Adapting FRET nanosensor assays to microplate formats enables parallel processing of numerous samples. Key optimization parameters include:

• Cell density standardization: Ensure consistent sensor expression and response across wells
• Automated liquid handling: For precise compound addition and mixing
• Environmental control: Maintain temperature and gas composition for plant cell viability [46]

Table 2: Comparison of High-Throughput Platforms

Platform	Throughput Capacity	Key Applications	Limitations
Microplate readers	96-1536 wells per run	Compound screening, dose-response studies	Limited spatial resolution [46]
Flow cytometry	Thousands of cells per second	Single-cell analysis, heterogeneous populations	No temporal resolution, complex setup [48]
Automated microscopy	10-100 fields per well	Subcellular localization, multiparameter imaging	Data storage challenges, slower acquisition [5]

Integration with Automation Systems

Full automation significantly enhances throughput and reproducibility:

• Robotic plate handlers: Enable continuous operation and integration with other instruments
• Automated image analysis: Implement machine learning algorithms for phenotype classification
• Data management systems: Handle large datasets generated by high-content screening [20]

For plant research, specialized tissue culture protocols may be required to prepare uniform cell suspensions or callus cultures compatible with automated systems [5].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Multiplexed FRET Sensor Calibration

This protocol establishes standardized procedures for calibrating multiple FRET sensors for simultaneous use, adapted from established QuanTI-FRET methodologies [47].

Materials:

• Purified FRET sensor proteins (2-5 μM in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% ethanol)
• Black-walled, clear-bottom 96-well microplates
• Fluorescence plate reader with dual excitation/emission capabilities
• Hormone stock solutions (100% ethanol)

Procedure:

• Distribute 100 μL sensor solution to each well
• Acquire baseline readings:
  • IDD: Donor excitation (450 nm)/donor emission (480 nm)
  • IDA: Donor excitation (450 nm)/acceptor emission (530 nm)
  • IAA: Acceptor excitation (500 nm)/acceptor emission (530 nm)
• Add hormone standards in increasing concentrations (0.1 nM-10 μM)
• Incubate 5 minutes at 25°C before measurement
• Calculate correction factors using control samples (donor-only, acceptor-only)
• Compute FRET efficiency (E) and emission ratio (acceptor/donor) for each sensor

Troubleshooting:

• If signal intensity is low, confirm sensor concentration and fluorophore maturity
• If response is saturated, verify hormone stock concentration and dilution accuracy
• If crosstalk is excessive, optimize filter sets or select alternative FRET pairs

Protocol 2: High-Throughput Compound Screening

This protocol describes a workflow for screening chemical libraries for compounds that modulate plant hormone levels or signaling, based on established high-throughput screening frameworks [46].

Materials:

• Stably transformed plant cell lines expressing FRET nanosensors
• 384-well microplates, automated liquid handling system
• Compound library (10 mM stocks in DMSO)
• Fluorescent plate reader with kinetic capabilities
• Data analysis software with curve-fitting capabilities

Procedure:

• Seed 50 μL cell suspension (OD600 ≈ 0.1) per well
• Using automated systems, transfer 100 nL compound solutions to appropriate wells
• Include controls on each plate:
  • Negative control (DMSO vehicle)
  • Positive control (saturating hormone concentration)
  • Background control (untreated cells)
• Centrifuge plates briefly (500 × g, 1 minute) to ensure mixing
• Incubate 30-60 minutes at 25°C
• Acquire FRET readings using appropriate filter sets
• Calculate Z'-factor for quality control: Z' = 1 - (3σp + 3σn)/|μp - μn| where σp, σn are standard deviations and μp, μn are means of positive and negative controls

Data Analysis:

• Normalize responses to plate controls
• Fit dose-response curves for hit compounds
• Apply statistical thresholds (typically >3σ from mean response)

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application
Fluorescent Proteins	mTFP1, mVenus, CFP, YFP [7]	FRET pairs for genetically encoded sensors
Nanomaterials	Quantum dots, gold nanoparticles, graphene oxide [45] [48]	Signal enhancement, improved photostability
Expression Vectors	pRSET-A, pcDNA3.1 [7]	Bacterial and mammalian sensor expression
Hormone Standards	JH I, II, III, methoprene [7]	Sensor calibration and validation
Detection Instruments	Fluorescence plate readers, microscopes with FRET capabilities [47]	Signal measurement and quantification

Visualization of Workflows

Multiplex Detection Strategy

High-Throughput Screening Pipeline

The integration of multiplex detection strategies with high-throughput scaling approaches represents a transformative advancement in plant hormone research using FRET nanosensors. The protocols and methodologies outlined here provide researchers with practical tools to increase experimental throughput while generating more comprehensive datasets on hormonal crosstalk and signaling dynamics. As these technologies continue to evolve, particularly with the incorporation of machine learning and improved nanomaterials, they promise to accelerate discovery in plant science, agricultural biotechnology, and agrochemical development.

Benchmarking Success: Validating and Comparing FRET Nanosensor Technology

The fabrication and application of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors represent a cutting-edge frontier in plant physiology, enabling the real-time, non-invasive detection of phytohormones. These sensors function as molecular rulers, utilizing the distance-dependent energy transfer between a donor fluorophore and an acceptor chromophore to detect and quantify specific analytes [20] [21]. The reliability of data generated by these sophisticated tools is heavily dependent on rigorous validation using fluorescence spectrometry and microscopic imaging. This document outlines detailed application notes and protocols for the validation of FRET nanosensors, with a specific focus on their application in plant hormone detection research. Proper validation is critical to ensure that observed fluorescence changes accurately report analyte concentration and are not artifacts of the complex plant cellular environment.

Experimental Protocols for Key Validation Experiments

Protocol: In Vitro Spectrofluorimetric Characterization of a FRET Nanosensor

This protocol details the steps for the initial in vitro validation of a FRET nanosensor's performance using fluorescence spectrometry, establishing its baseline sensitivity and selectivity before proceeding to complex biological systems [9] [49].

1. Primary Equipment & Reagents:

• Spectrofluorometer (e.g., Shimadzu RF 5301 PC) capable of scanning excitation and emission spectra [49].
• Cuvettes: Quartz, suitable for the chosen solvent volume.
• Stock Solution of Nanosensor: Prepared in an appropriate buffer (e.g., phosphate buffer, pH 7.4).
• Stock Solution of Target Analyte: For example, a 1 mM solution of salicylic acid (SA) or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in buffer or solvent [9] [28].
• Control Solutions: Solutions of potentially interfering compounds to test selectivity.

2. Procedure: 1. Initial Spectra Acquisition: Place the nanosensor solution in the cuvette and load it into the spectrofluorometer. Acquire the excitation and emission spectra without the analyte present. Identify the peak excitation wavelength for the donor and the emission peaks for both the donor and acceptor. 2. Titration Experiment: Add increasing, known concentrations of the target analyte (e.g., SA or IAA) to the nanosensor solution. Mix thoroughly and allow the reaction to proceed (e.g., <5 seconds for ultra-fast sensors [9]). 3. Post-Addition Spectra Acquisition: After each addition, record the full emission spectrum upon excitation at the donor's peak wavelength. 4. Data Point Collection: For a ratiometric sensor, collect fluorescence intensity data at the two characteristic emission wavelengths (e.g., donor and acceptor peaks) for every analyte concentration tested. 5. Selectivity Assessment: Repeat steps 2-4 with control solutions of interfering compounds to confirm the sensor's specific response to the target analyte.

3. Data Analysis:

• Ratiometric Calculation: For each analyte concentration, calculate the fluorescence intensity ratio (e.g., Acceptor Emission / Donor Emission).
• Calibration Curve: Plot the fluorescence ratio against the logarithm of the analyte concentration. Fit the data to a suitable model (e.g., sigmoidal curve) to determine the dynamic range and limit of detection (LOD) [9].
• Sensor Kinetics: Analyze the change in fluorescence over time after analyte addition to determine the response time.

Table 1: Exemplar Performance Metrics for FRET-based Phytohormone Nanosensors

Sensor & Target	Dynamic Range	Response Time	Limit of Detection (LOD)	Key Reference
DNR (Salicylic Acid)	Not Specified	< 5 seconds	Not Specified	[9]
SWCNT-based (IAA)	Species-agnostic	Real-time	High precision (direct measurement)	[28]
QD-based (Virus CP)	Linear range specified	~30 minutes	100 ng mL⁻¹ (for virus)	[4]

Protocol: Validation in Plant Tissues via Multiphoton Microscopy

This protocol describes the use of multiphoton microscopy for non-destructive, high-resolution imaging and validation of nanosensor performance within living plant tissues, such as roots, leaves, or calluses [9] [50].

1. Primary Equipment & Reagents:

• Multiphoton Laser Scanning Microscope: Equipped with a long-wavelength pulsed laser and high-sensitivity detectors (e.g., PMTs) [9].
• Plant Material: Living, intact plants (e.g., Arabidopsis, cucumber, Nicotiana benthamiana) or callus cultures.
• Validated Nanosensor Solution: The same sensor characterized in Protocol 2.1.
• Microinjection System or Incubation Media: For introducing the nanosensor into plant tissues.
• Environmental Chamber: To maintain plant health during imaging (control of light, temperature, humidity).

2. Procedure: 1. Sensor Loading: Introduce the nanosensor into the plant tissue. This can be achieved via: * Microinjection: For precise delivery into specific cells (e.g., guard cells). * Incubation: For roots or calluses, incubate the tissue in a solution containing the nanosensor [9]. * Infiltration: For leaves, use a syringe without a needle to infiltrate the sensor solution. 2. Microscope Setup: Configure the multiphoton microscope. Set the excitation wavelength to the donor's two-photon absorption optimum. Configure two emission channels to simultaneously detect donor and acceptor fluorescence. 3. Baseline Ratiometric Imaging: Place the prepared plant specimen on the stage. Focus on the region of interest (ROI) and acquire a baseline ratiometric image. Calculate the initial fluorescence ratio (R₀) for the ROI. 4. Stimulus Application: Apply a physiological or environmental stimulus expected to alter the phytohormone level. Examples include: * Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to induce SA accumulation. * Shade or heat stress to perturb auxin (IAA) distribution [28]. * Abscisic acid (ABA) to induce stomatal closure, potentially linked to SA [9]. 5. Time-Series Imaging: Continuously or intermittently acquire ratiometric images over time to monitor dynamic changes in the sensor's signal in response to the stimulus. 6. Post-Experiment Calibration (Optional): If possible, perform an in-situ calibration at the end of the experiment by perfusing the tissue with saturating and zero analyte solutions.

3. Data Analysis:

• Image Processing: Use image analysis software (e.g., ImageJ, Fiji) to generate ratiometric images (Acceptor Channel / Donor Channel) for each time point.
• Quantification: Measure the average fluorescence ratio in specific cellular compartments (e.g., cytosol, nucleus) or tissues (e.g., root cap, guard cells) over time.
• Visualization: Create a time-lapse video of the ratiometric images to visually represent the spatiotemporal dynamics of the phytohormone.

Critical Validation Parameters and Techniques

FRET Efficiency and Specificity Controls

A rigorous FRET experiment requires control samples to safeguard against false observations and confirm that signal changes are due to genuine energy transfer, not other environmental factors or direct excitation [21].

• No-FRET Reference: Always image a sample containing only the donor fluorophore (e.g., a plant expressing only the donor fluorescent protein). This establishes the donor's fluorescence intensity and lifetime in the absence of FRET and is essential for calculating FRET efficiency [21].
• Acceptor-Only Control: Image a sample containing only the acceptor to quantify the level of direct acceptor excitation by the donor's excitation wavelength. This signal must be subtracted for accurate FRET calculation [21].
• Specificity and Interference Controls: Challenge the sensor in the plant with structurally similar compounds or other prevalent ions/molecules to confirm the specificity of the response. For example, a SA sensor should not respond to jasmonic acid or ABA under controlled conditions [9].

Quantification and Sensor Performance Metrics

The following parameters must be quantified to fully validate a FRET nanosensor.

• Stokes Shift: The difference between the maximum of the excitation and emission spectra. A large Stokes shift (e.g., ~151 nm for sensor DNR [9]) reduces background from scattered excitation light.
• Photostability: Assess the rate of photobleaching of both donor and acceptor fluorophores during prolonged microscopy by monitoring their fluorescence intensity over time under constant illumination.
• Biocompatibility and Cytotoxicity: Confirm that the sensor does not adversely affect plant physiology. This can be evaluated by monitoring growth rates, stomatal opening/closing dynamics, and seed germination in the presence of the sensor [9] [28].

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for FRET Nanosensor Validation

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Key Considerations
Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs)	Nanosensor scaffold for near-infrared phytohormone (e.g., IAA) sensing [28].	Bypasses chlorophyll interference; enables non-invasive, real-time monitoring.
Quantum Dots (QDs, e.g., CdTe, CdS)	Semiconductor nanocrystals acting as FRET donors in viral pathogen diagnostics [4].	High brightness and photostability; requires assessment of cytotoxicity in plants.
Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)	Act as FRET acceptors or plasmonic enhancers; used in electrochemical and optical biosensors [20].	Excellent quenching efficiency; enhances thermal and electric conductivity.
Rhodamine-based Dyes	FRET acceptors in ratiometric sensors (e.g., for Salicylic Acid) [9].	Exhibits spirolactam "on-off" configuration, leading to high selectivity and sensitivity.
Cetrimide Solution (0.1% w/v)	Solvent for enhancing fluorescence potential in spectrofluorimetric analysis [49].	Optimizes and stabilizes fluorescence signal of certain analytes/dyes.

Workflow and Data Pathway Visualization

The following diagram summarizes the logical workflow for the comprehensive validation of a FRET nanosensor, from initial fabrication to final application in plant research.

The signaling pathways investigated using these validated sensors reveal critical plant physiological processes. For instance, the diagram below illustrates a SA-mediated stomatal closure pathway, a key immune response, as elucidated by a FRET nanosensor.

Comparative Analysis vs. Traditional Methods (LC-MS, ELISA)

The precise detection and quantification of plant hormones (phytohormones) are fundamental to advancing research in plant physiology, stress response, and drug development from natural products. For decades, traditional analytical methods like Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) have been the cornerstones of phytohormone analysis [51]. Recently, emerging techniques, particularly those based on Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) nanosensors, have introduced new capabilities for real-time, in vivo monitoring [52] [53]. This Application Note provides a comparative analysis of these techniques, detailing their principles, performance, and experimental protocols to guide researchers in selecting the appropriate method for their specific applications in plant hormone detection.

Technology Comparison and Performance Data

The following table summarizes the core characteristics, advantages, and limitations of LC-MS/MS, ELISA, and FRET-based nanosensors for plant hormone detection.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Phytohormone Detection Methods

Feature	LC-MS/MS	ELISA	FRET Nanosensors
Principle	Chromatographic separation followed by mass-based detection [51]	Antibody-antigen interaction with enzymatic colorimetric detection [51]	Distance-dependent energy transfer between donor and acceptor fluorophores [52]
Key Advantage	High specificity, ability to profile multiple analytes simultaneously [54] [55]	Simple protocol, high throughput, cost-effective [51]	Real-time, in vivo imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution [52] [53]
Primary Limitation	Destructive sampling, complex sample preparation, expensive instrumentation [54] [51]	Potential for antibody cross-reactivity, limited multiplexing, destructive sampling [51]	Currently limited to a subset of hormones, requires probe design and validation [52]
Sensitivity	Excellent (trace-level detection) [51]	Good for moderate concentrations [51]	High (e.g., NIR-II sensors can detect H₂O₂ at 0.43 µM) [56]
Quantitative Performance	Highly quantitative, broad dynamic range [51]	Quantitative, but can be affected by matrix interference [51]	Semi- to fully quantitative, enables kinetic studies [53]
Sample Throughput	Moderate	High	Low to Moderate (depending on imaging setup)
Tissue/Cellular Resolution	Bulk tissue analysis (Homogenized) [54]	Bulk tissue analysis (Homogenized)	Cellular and subcellular resolution [52] [53]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: LC-MS/MS for Phytohormone Profiling

This protocol for the simultaneous quantification of abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), gibberellic acid (GA), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is adapted from a unified analytical approach [54] [55].

Materials and Reagents

• LC-MS Grade Solvents: Methanol, formic acid [54] [55].
• Internal Standard: Salicylic acid D4 (Sigma-Aldrich) [54] [55].
• Analytical Standards: IAA, GA, SA, ABA (Sigma-Aldrich) [54] [55].
• Equipment: SHIMADZU LC-30AD Nexera X2 system coupled with an LC-MS 8060 mass spectrometer; ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (4.6 x 100 mm, 3.5 μm) [54] [55].

Sample Preparation and Extraction

• Homogenization: Flash-freeze approximately 1.0 g of plant tissue in liquid nitrogen and homogenize to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle [54] [55].
• Matrix-Specific Extraction: Transfer the powder to a tube and add extraction solvent tailored to the specific plant matrix (e.g., for dates, a two-step procedure with acetic acid and 2% HCl in ethanol is used to handle high sugar content) [54] [55].
• Add Internal Standard: Spike the extraction solvent with a known concentration of the internal standard, salicylic acid D4, to correct for variability [54] [55].
• Centrifugation and Filtration: Centrifuge the homogenate at 3000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Filter the supernatant through a 0.22 µm syringe filter [54] [55].
• Dilution: Dilute the resulting extract with the LC mobile phase to ensure compatibility with the LC-MS/MS system [54] [55].

LC-MS/MS Analysis

• Chromatography: Utilize a binary gradient with water and methanol, both containing 0.1% formic acid, on a C18 column maintained at 40°C [54].
• Mass Spectrometry: Operate the mass spectrometer in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode for high specificity and sensitivity. The specific MRM transitions for each phytohormone must be optimized prior to the analytical run [54].

The workflow for this protocol is summarized in the diagram below.

Protocol 2: Fabrication and Use of FRET-Based Nanosensors

This protocol outlines the general principles for designing and implementing FRET-based nanosensors for in vivo plant hormone detection, based on recent advances in fluorescent probes [52] [56].

Materials and Reagents

• Fluorophores: Donor and acceptor fluorophores with spectral overlap (e.g., NIR-II AIE fluorophores, quantum dots) [4] [52] [56].
• Biological Recognition Element: Hormone-binding protein (e.g., receptor ligand-binding domain) [52].
• Nanoparticles/Scaffolds: Materials for probe assembly (e.g., polystyrene nanospheres, polymetallic oxomolybdates) [56].
• Equipment: Confocal or NIR-II fluorescence microscopy system for live-cell imaging [56].

Sensor Design and Assembly

• Selection of Components: Choose a FRET pair where the emission spectrum of the donor overlaps with the absorption spectrum of the acceptor. The biological recognition element (e.g., a hormone-binding protein) must undergo a conformational change upon hormone binding [52].
• Conjugation: Conjugate the donor fluorophore and the acceptor fluorophore to the N- and C-termini (or other strategic sites) of the hormone-binding protein. The conjugation should position the fluorophores such that hormone binding alters the distance or orientation between them, leading to a measurable change in FRET efficiency [52].
• Nanocarrier Encapsulation (Optional): For stability and delivery, the FRET construct can be encapsulated into nanocarriers, such as polystyrene nanospheres, using methods like the organic solvent swelling technique [56].
• Validation: Characterize the sensor's specificity, sensitivity, and dynamic range in vitro before plant application.

Plant Application and Imaging

• Sensor Delivery: Introduce the FRET nanosensor into plant tissues. Methods can include biolistic delivery (gene gun) for genetically encoded sensors, or infiltration/incubation for nanoparticle-based sensors [52] [56].
• Live-Plant Imaging: Mount the treated plant or tissue under a fluorescence microscope. For NIR-II sensors, this helps avoid interference from plant autofluorescence [56].
• Data Acquisition and Analysis: Acquire time-lapse images of the donor and acceptor emission channels. Calculate the FRET ratio (acceptor emission / donor emission) over time. An increase or decrease in this ratio indicates hormone binding or release [52].

The conceptual framework for FRET nanosensor operation is illustrated below.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents

The following table lists essential reagents and materials critical for successful experimentation in this field.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Phytohormone Detection

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Example & Notes
Deuterated Internal Standards	Normalizes extraction and ionization variability in LC-MS/MS for precise quantification.	Salicylic acid D4; isotope-labeled versions of target analytes are ideal [54] [55].
LC-MS Grade Solvents	Ensures high-purity mobile phases to minimize background noise and ion suppression in LC-MS/MS.	Methanol, Acetonitrile, Water with 0.1% Formic Acid [54] [55].
Specific Antibodies	Serves as the biorecognition element in ELISA for capturing and detecting target phytohormones.	Must be validated for minimal cross-reactivity with structurally similar compounds [51].
NIR-II Fluorophores	Acts as a signal reporter in nanosensors, enabling deep-tissue imaging with low background autofluorescence.	AIE1035 (Aggregation-Induced Emission fluorophore) [56].
Functionalized Nanoparticles	Platform for constructing nanosensors; provides a quenchable or modifiable surface.	Polymetallic Oxomolybdates (POMs), Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs), Quantum Dots [20] [4] [56].
Genetically Encoded Biosensors	Enables non-destructive, spatio-temporal monitoring of hormone dynamics in live plants.	FRET-based protein constructs (e.g., for abscisic acid) [52] [53].

The choice between LC-MS/MS, ELISA, and FRET-based nanosensors is dictated by the specific research question. LC-MS/MS remains the gold standard for absolute quantification and comprehensive profiling of multiple phytohormones from homogenized tissues [54] [51]. ELISA offers a high-throughput, cost-effective alternative for targeted analysis when absolute specificity is not the primary concern [51]. In contrast, FRET-based nanosensors represent a paradigm shift, offering unparalleled insights into the dynamic spatio-temporal changes of hormone signaling in living plants, thus opening new frontiers in understanding plant physiology and stress adaptation [52] [53] [56].

Assessing Sensitivity, Specificity, and Real-Time Monitoring Capabilities

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors have emerged as powerful tools for the specific and sensitive detection of biomolecules, enabling real-time monitoring of dynamic physiological processes in living systems [57]. In the context of plant biology, these sensors offer unprecedented opportunities to study phytohormone signaling networks, which are crucial for understanding plant growth, development, and stress responses [9] [26]. The working principle of FRET relies on non-radiative energy transfer from an excited donor fluorophore to a nearby acceptor fluorophore through dipole-dipole interactions, which is highly dependent on their proximity (typically within 1-10 nm) [35] [57]. This distance-dependent energy transfer provides a robust mechanism for converting molecular recognition events into quantifiable fluorescence signals, allowing researchers to monitor phytohormone dynamics with high spatiotemporal resolution in non-model plant species without the need for genetic engineering [56] [26].

This application note provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the critical performance parameters of FRET-based nanosensors, with a specific focus on plant hormone detection. We present standardized methodologies for quantifying sensor sensitivity, specificity, and real-time monitoring capabilities, along with detailed protocols for sensor characterization and implementation. The information presented herein is designed to support researchers in the fabrication, optimization, and application of FRET nanosensors for advanced plant hormone research.

Performance Metrics of FRET-Based Nanosensors

The performance of FRET-based nanosensors is characterized by several key parameters that determine their utility for specific research applications. The table below summarizes quantitative performance data from recently developed FRET-based sensors for various plant-related analytes.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Representative FRET-Based Nanosensors

Target Analyte	Sensor Name	Sensitivity (Kd or LOD)	Specificity (Key Interferences Tested)	Response Time	Dynamic Range	Reference
Salicylic Acid (SA)	DNR	Not specified	Good selectivity over other compounds	< 5 seconds	Ratiometric change observed	[9]
Manganese Ions (Mn²⁺)	SenMn	Kd = 25.1 μM	Highly specific for Mn²⁺ over other biologically relevant ions	Real-time monitoring	Nanomolar to millimolar	[44]
N-Acetyl-5-Neuraminic Acid	FLIP-SA	Nanomolar to millimolar	Highly specific to NeuAc	Real-time flux analysis	Nanomolar to millimolar	[11]
Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂)	AIE1035NPs@Mo/Cu-POM	0.43 μM	Selective response to H₂O₂ over other endogenous molecules	1 minute	Not specified	[56]

Sensor Design and Mechanism

FRET-based nanosensors typically employ a modular architecture consisting of a ligand-binding domain flanked by two fluorescent proteins that form a FRET pair. Common FRET pairs include cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP/YFP), with newer sensors utilizing advanced variants such as CyPet and YPet for improved performance [44] [26]. The binding of the target analyte induces conformational changes in the sensing domain, altering the distance and/or orientation between the donor and acceptor fluorophores, which modulates FRET efficiency [35] [57]. This change in FRET efficiency provides a ratiometric readout that is largely independent of sensor concentration, enabling quantitative analysis of analyte levels in living systems [9] [26].

The following diagram illustrates the fundamental working principle of a FRET-based nanosensor for plant hormone detection:

Figure 1: Working principle of FRET-based nanosensors for plant hormone detection. In the unbound state, donor and acceptor fluorophores are separated beyond the Förster radius, resulting in low FRET efficiency. Hormone binding induces a conformational change that brings the fluorophores within the Förster radius, enabling energy transfer and increasing acceptor emission.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: In Vitro Characterization of FRET Nanosensors

Purpose and Principle

This protocol describes the standard procedure for characterizing the sensitivity, specificity, and dynamic range of FRET-based nanosensors using purified sensor proteins in controlled in vitro conditions. This initial characterization is essential for establishing baseline performance parameters before proceeding to more complex in vivo applications [9] [11].

Materials and Reagents

Table 2: Essential Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Characterization

Reagent/Material	Specifications	Function/Application
Purified nanosensor protein	≥95% purity, confirmed sequence	Core sensing element
Target phytohormone (analyte)	Analytical standard grade	Primary analyte for sensitivity testing
Potential interfering compounds	Analytical standard grade	Specificity assessment
Buffer system	Physiological pH range (6.0-7.5)	Maintain physiological conditions
Spectrofluorometer	Dual excitation/emission capability	Fluorescence measurement

Experimental Workflow

The following diagram outlines the key steps for in vitro characterization of FRET nanosensors:

Figure 2: Experimental workflow for in vitro characterization of FRET nanosensors.

Procedure

• Sensor Preparation: Express and purify the FRET nanosensor protein according to standard molecular biology protocols. For bacterial expression systems, transform the sensor construct into BL21(DE3) E. coli cells, induce with 0.5 mM IPTG at 20°C for 24 hours, and purify using affinity chromatography appropriate for the tag used [11].

• Baseline Measurement: Dilute the purified sensor to an appropriate concentration (typically 1-5 μM) in physiological buffer. Place the solution in a quartz cuvette and measure the fluorescence emission spectrum with excitation at the donor wavelength. Record emission intensities at both donor and acceptor peak wavelengths [9].

• Analyte Titration: Prepare a series of analyte (phytohormone) solutions at varying concentrations covering a range from sub-nanomolar to millimolar. Add increasing amounts of analyte to the sensor solution, mixing thoroughly after each addition. After each addition, record the complete emission spectrum or measure intensities at donor and acceptor emission maxima [44].

• FRET Ratio Calculation: For each measurement, calculate the FRET ratio (R) using the formula: R = IA / ID, where IA is the fluorescence intensity at the acceptor emission maximum and ID is the intensity at the donor emission maximum. Normalize the ratios to the initial ratio without analyte [9].

• Specificity Assessment: Repeat the titration experiment with structurally similar compounds, metabolites, or ions that might potentially interfere with sensor function. Compare the FRET response to that of the target analyte to establish specificity [44].

• Data Analysis: Plot the normalized FRET ratio against the logarithm of analyte concentration. Fit the data to an appropriate binding model (e.g., Hill equation) to determine the dissociation constant (Kd) and dynamic range of the sensor [44] [11].

Protocol 2: Real-Time Monitoring in Plant Systems

Purpose and Principle

This protocol describes methods for implementing FRET-based nanosensors for real-time monitoring of phytohormone dynamics in living plant tissues, cells, or organelles. Real-time monitoring provides insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of signaling molecules during physiological processes and stress responses [9] [56].

Materials and Reagents

Table 3: Essential Reagents for Plant System Implementation

Reagent/Material	Specifications	Function/Application
Genetically encoded sensor constructs	Plant-optimized codons	Stable expression in plant systems
Nanoparticle-based sensors	Biocompatible formulation	Exogenous application
Plant growth materials	Sterile culture media, containers	Maintain plant viability
Confocal microscopy system	FRET-optimized filters	High-resolution imaging
Microinjection system (optional)	Fine needle capability	Direct sensor delivery

Experimental Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the approach for real-time monitoring in plant systems:

Figure 3: Workflow for real-time monitoring of phytohormones in plant systems using FRET nanosensors.

Procedure

• Sensor Implementation:

  • Genetic Transformation: For genetically encoded sensors, introduce the sensor construct into plants using appropriate transformation methods (e.g., Agrobacterium-mediated transformation for dicots, particle bombardment for monocots). Generate stable transgenic lines and confirm sensor expression [26].
  • Exogenous Application: For nanoparticle-based sensors, apply to plant tissues through infiltration (e.g., vacuum infiltration, syringe infiltration) or direct application to roots. Optimize concentration to maximize signal while minimizing toxicity [56].

• Microscopy Setup: Configure an appropriate microscopy system (confocal, multiphoton, or epifluorescence) with filter sets optimized for the specific FRET pair used. For CFP/YFP pairs, use excitation at 405-440 nm, donor emission at 460-500 nm, and acceptor emission at 520-560 nm. Set up appropriate controls to account for autofluorescence and bleed-through [9].

• Baseline Imaging: Acquire baseline ratiometric images of the sensor-expressing tissue before applying any experimental treatment. Collect images at both donor and acceptor emission channels with excitation at the donor wavelength. Calculate the baseline FRET ratio for each region of interest [56].

• Stimulus Application: Apply the experimental stimulus (e.g., pathogen inoculation, hormone treatment, abiotic stress) while maintaining the plant under the microscope for continuous monitoring. For time-lapse experiments, ensure environmental control (temperature, humidity, light) throughout the imaging period [9].

• Time-Lapse Imaging: Acquire time-lapse images at appropriate intervals (seconds to minutes, depending on the expected kinetics). For fast processes like stomatal closure in response to salicylic acid, image every 5-30 seconds [9]. For slower processes like systemic acquired resistance, intervals of 15-60 minutes may be sufficient.

• Data Analysis: Process images to calculate FRET ratios over time. Use the formula: R = IA / ID for each time point. Generate kymographs or heat maps to visualize spatiotemporal dynamics. Quantify response kinetics (onset, duration, recovery) and amplitude [9] [56].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development and Application

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application Notes
Fluorescent Proteins	CFP, YFP, CyPet, YPet, mCerulean, mVenus	FRET pairs with spectral overlap; CyPet/YPet offer improved brightness and photostability [44]
Ligand-Binding Domains	MntC (Mn²⁺), SiaP (sialic acid), salicylic acid-binding domains	Periplasmic binding proteins often used for their conformational changes upon ligand binding [9] [44] [11]
Expression Systems	pRSET-B (bacterial), pYES-DEST52 (yeast), plant binary vectors	Protein expression and purification; pRSET-B suitable for initial sensor characterization [44] [11]
Nanoparticle Components	AIE1035 NPs, Mo/Cu-POM, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots	Signal reporters and quenchers for exogenous sensors; AIE1035 provides NIR-II capability [56]
Plant Transformation	Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains, plant tissue culture media	Stable integration of genetically encoded sensors; use silencing-deficient mutants for improved expression [26]

Troubleshooting and Technical Notes

Optimizing Signal-to-Noise Ratio

• Background Fluorescence: Plant tissues exhibit significant autofluorescence, particularly from chlorophyll (emission 600-700 nm) and cell wall components [26]. Select FRET pairs with emissions outside these ranges or use spectral unmixing techniques to minimize interference.
• Photobleaching: Implement strategies to reduce photobleaching during time-lapse imaging, including lower excitation intensity, neutral density filters, and oxygen scavenging systems for in vitro applications [35].

Addressing Sensor Limitations

• Dynamic Range: The dynamic range of FRET sensors can be limited by the conformational change of the binding domain [35]. Optimization via linker engineering between the fluorescent proteins and binding domain can enhance the dynamic range.
• pH Sensitivity: Many fluorescent proteins and binding domains are sensitive to pH variations [44] [11]. Characterize sensor performance across physiological pH ranges (typically 5.5-7.5 for plant systems) and implement controls for pH changes during experiments.

Advanced Implementation Strategies

• Subcellular Targeting: Incorporate targeting sequences (nuclear localization signals, chloroplast transit peptides, etc.) to monitor hormone dynamics in specific subcellular compartments [44].
• Multiplexing Capabilities: Develop sensors with distinct spectral characteristics to enable simultaneous monitoring of multiple hormones, facilitating the study of signaling crosstalk [57].

FRET-based nanosensors represent a powerful methodology for investigating phytohormone dynamics with high sensitivity, specificity, and spatiotemporal resolution. The protocols and guidelines presented in this application note provide researchers with a comprehensive framework for developing, characterizing, and implementing these sophisticated tools in plant hormone research. By enabling real-time, non-destructive monitoring of signaling molecules in living plants, FRET nanosensors are poised to significantly advance our understanding of plant physiology and accelerate the development of strategies for crop improvement and sustainable agriculture.

Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness and Potential for Commercial Translation

Application Notes: Performance and Cost Analysis of FRET Nanosensors

This section provides a comparative analysis of recently developed FRET-based nanosensors for plant hormone detection, summarizing key performance metrics and a breakdown of associated costs to aid in project planning and commercial evaluation.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Representative FRET Nanosensors for Plant Hormone Detection

Nanosensor Name / Type	Target Analyte	Detection Range	Response Time	Key Performance Features & Applications
FREJIA [7]	Juvenile Hormone (JH I, II, III), Methoprene	Nanomolar ranges	Real-time	First ratiometric, genetically encoded biosensor for JH; enables real-time, nondestructive monitoring in live cells. [7]
DNR Sensor [9]	Salicylic Acid (SA)	Not Specified	< 5 seconds	Ratiometric; large Stokes shift (~151 nm); good selectivity; non-destructive imaging of SA transport in roots and stomata. [9]
Near-IR Nanosensor [28]	Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)	Real-time tracking	Real-time	Uses near-infrared imaging to bypass chlorophyll interference; non-invasive, does not require genetic modification; species-agnostic. [28]
Generic FRET-Based [26]	Metabolites, Ions, Reactive Oxygen Species	Varies by design	Varies	Genetically encoded or exogenously applied; allows ratiometric detection, eliminating ambiguities through self-calibration. [26]

Table 2: Cost and Resource Analysis for FRET Nanosensor Development and Implementation

Cost Component	FREJIA (Genetically Encoded)	DNR (Exogenous Chemical Sensor)	Near-IR Nanosensor (Exogenous)
Research & Development	High (Protein engineering, vector design, mutant plant lines) [7] [26]	Medium-High (Organic synthesis, characterization) [9]	High (Polymer synthesis, single-walled carbon nanotube functionalization) [28]
Production/Manufacturing	Medium (Recombinant protein expression in E. coli, purification) [7]	Medium (Chemical synthesis, purification)	Medium (Nanomaterial fabrication, quality control)
Key Materials & Reagents	FRET plasmid vectors, fluorescent proteins (mTFP1, mVenus), E. coli BL21(DE3), affinity chromatography columns [7]	Specialty organic dyes (Rhodamine B hydrazide, naphthalic anhydride), solvents for synthesis [9]	Single-walled carbon nanotubes, specialty polymers [28]
Implementation & Usability	Requires genetic transformation of host organism or cell line [7] [26]	Exogenous application to plant tissues; simple incubation [9] [26]	Exogenous application; compatible with existing agricultural systems without genetic modification [28]
Equipment & Readout	Standard fluorescence microscopy/spectrophotometry [7]	Fluorescence microscopy/spectrophotometry [9]	Near-infrared fluorescence imaging systems [28]

Commercial Translation Potential

The potential for commercial translation is significantly influenced by the sensor's format. Exogenously applied nanosensors, such as the DNR and Near-IR sensors, present a lower barrier to entry for commercial application as they do not require the creation and regulatory approval of genetically modified plants, making them more readily adoptable for use in existing crops. [9] [28] A major commercial driver is the move towards multiplexing—combining multiple sensors to monitor a spectrum of plant growth markers and hormones simultaneously, providing a comprehensive picture of plant health. [28] Furthermore, integration with portable devices and artificial intelligence (AI) is creating a pathway for practical, field-ready solutions for agricultural monitoring, moving from lab-based tools to actionable insights for farmers. [20] [30]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: In Vitro Characterization of a Genetically Encoded FRET Nanosensor (e.g., FREJIA)

This protocol details the procedure for expressing, purifying, and conducting in vitro ligand binding assays for a genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor, as developed for Juvenile Hormone detection. [7]

Materials and Equipment

• Recombinant Expression Vector: pRSET-A vector encoding the FRET sensor (e.g., mTFP1-JHBP-mVenus). [7]
• Host Cells: Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) chemically competent cells. [7]
• Growth Medium: LB broth supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. [7]
• Inducer: Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).
• Lysis Buffer: Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.5. [7]
• Purification System: Ni–NTA affinity chromatography (e.g., HisTrap HP column) and size-exclusion chromatography (e.g., HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 prep-grade column). [7]
• Elution Buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, and 400 mM imidazole. [7]
• Ligands: Target hormones (e.g., JH I, II, III) and analogs dissolved in 100% ethanol. [7]
• Assay Plate: 96-well clear-bottom polystyrene microplate. [7]
• Detection Instrument: Fluorescence spectrophotometer or a fluorescence microplate reader capable of ratiometric FRET measurements. [7]

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Transformation and Expression:

  • Transform the FRET sensor expression vector into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and plate on LB-ampicillin agar.
  • Inoculate a single colony into 100 mL of LB medium with ampicillin and culture at 37°C with shaking until mid-log phase (OD600 ≈ 0.6).
  • Induce protein expression by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM.
  • Incubate the culture at 16°C for 16 hours in the dark to minimize photobleaching. [7]

• Protein Purification:

  • Harvest cells by centrifugation and resuspend the pellet in PBS buffer.
  • Lyse the cells by ultrasonication on ice.
  • Clarify the lysate by centrifugation and load the supernatant onto a Ni–NTA affinity column.
  • Wash the column with a buffer containing 20 mM imidazole.
  • Elute the purified sensor protein using an elution buffer with 400 mM imidazole.
  • For further purification, apply the eluate to a size-exclusion chromatography column equilibrated with an appropriate buffer (e.g., PBS or Tris-HCl). [7]

• In Vitro FRET Assay:

  • Dilute the purified FREJIA protein to a concentration of 2–5 μM in assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% ethanol).
  • Dispense the sensor solution into a 96-well microplate.
  • Add ligands (hormones or analogs) dissolved in ethanol to the wells. Include ethanol-only controls.
  • Incubate the plate at 25°C.
  • Acquire fluorescence spectra using a spectrophotometer.
    • Excite the donor at 450 nm and collect the donor emission at 480 nm.
    • Excite the acceptor at 500 nm and collect the acceptor emission at 530 nm.
    • For FRET measurement, excite the donor at 450 nm and collect the acceptor emission at 530 nm. [7]
  • Calculate the FRET ratio as the emission intensity ratio of the acceptor (mVenus) to the donor (mTFP1). [7]

Protocol 2: Application of an Exogenous Ratiometric FRET Sensor in Plants (e.g., DNR Sensor)

This protocol describes the application of a synthetically fabricated, exogenous FRET sensor for the detection and visualization of salicylic acid in living plant tissues. [9]

Materials and Equipment

• Sensor Solution: DNR sensor, synthesized as described [9], dissolved in an appropriate buffer or solvent compatible with plant tissue.
• Plant Material: Healthy, young plants (e.g., cucumber, Nicotiana benthamiana).
• Control Solutions: Salicylic acid stock solution for exogenous application, buffer-only control.
• Imaging Equipment: Multiphoton laser scanning microscope or a confocal fluorescence microscope equipped with appropriate filter sets.
  • For DNR: Excitation at 488 nm, and collection of emission windows for both the donor (green, ~510-550 nm) and acceptor (red, ~570-620 nm) channels. [9]

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Plant Preparation and Staining:

  • Grow plants under controlled conditions until the desired developmental stage.
  • Carefully excavate seedlings for root imaging, ensuring minimal damage.
  • Immerse the roots or apply the sensor solution to the surface of the leaf or other target tissue.
  • Incubate for a predetermined period (e.g., 30-60 minutes) to allow for sensor uptake.
  • Rinse gently with buffer to remove excess sensor from the surface. [9]

• Hormone Stimulation (Optional):

  • To observe dynamic changes, treat the sensor-loaded plants with a solution containing salicylic acid.
  • A control group should be treated with buffer only. [9]

• Ratiometric Fluorescence Imaging:

  • Mount the plant tissue on a microscope slide for imaging.
  • Using a microscope with multiphoton or confocal capabilities, excite the sensor at 488 nm.
  • Simultaneously collect emission signals in both the green (donor) and red (acceptor) channels.
  • Generate a ratiometric image by digitally dividing the fluorescence intensity of the acceptor channel by that of the donor channel (Red/Green) on a pixel-by-pixel basis. [9]

• Data Analysis:

  • Analyze the ratiometric images to quantify the spatial distribution and relative abundance of SA.
  • Note a color shift from green to orange/red in the presence of SA, indicating FRET occurrence and SA binding. [9]

Visualization: Signaling Pathways and Workflows

FRET Nanosensor Mechanism

Experimental Workflow for Sensor Validation

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for FRET Nanosensor Development

Item	Function/Application	Example from Literature
FRET Plasmid Vectors	Backbone for genetically encoding the sensor; contains bacterial origin of replication, antibiotic resistance, and promoter.	pRSET-A vector for bacterial expression [7]; pcDNA3.1 for mammalian cell expression [7].
Fluorescent Proteins / Dyes	Serve as the donor and acceptor fluorophores in the FRET pair.	mTFP1 (donor) and mVenus (acceptor) for FREJIA [7]; Naphthalimide (donor) and Rhodamine B (acceptor) for DNR [9].
Ligand-Binding Domains	Provides specificity and induces conformational change upon target binding.	Juvenile Hormone-Binding Protein (JHBP) from Bombyx mori [7].
Chromatography Systems	For purification of recombinant protein sensors after expression.	Ni–NTA Affinity Column (for His-tagged proteins), Size-Exclusion Chromatography (for further purification) [7].
Microscopy & Detection	Enables visualization and quantification of FRET signals in vitro and in living tissues.	Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (in vitro assays) [7]; Multiphoton/Confocal Microscope (for plant tissue imaging) [9].

Conclusion

FRET-based nanosensors represent a paradigm shift in plant hormone research, offering unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution for non-destructive analysis. The synthesis of knowledge from foundational principles to advanced applications confirms their superiority over traditional methods for real-time, in vivo monitoring. Key takeaways include the critical importance of strategic sensor design, the successful deployment in visualizing hormone dynamics in stomatal closure and stress responses, and the ongoing need to address challenges in sensor stability and large-scale production. Future directions point toward the integration of artificial intelligence for data analysis, the development of user-friendly portable devices for field application, and the exciting potential for clinical translation. The principles honed in plant systems, particularly in targeted sensing and controlled delivery, offer a robust framework for innovating diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in biomedical research, such as in exosome-based cancer detection and targeted drug delivery systems.

References

• 1. Förster resonance energy transfer [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%B6rster_resonance_energy_transfer]
• 2. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) [https://www.teledynevisionsolutions.com/learn/learning-center/scientific-imaging/f%C3%B6rster-resonance-energy-transfer-fret/]
• 3. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer FRET—Note 1.2 [https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/molecular-probes-the-handbook/technical-notes-and-product-highlights/fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer-fret.html]
• 4. Nanomaterial-based biosensors: a new frontier in plant ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055542/]
• 5. Nanosensor Applications in Plant Science - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9496508/]
• 6. Biosensors: Plant biologists FRET over stress [https://elifesciences.org/articles/02763]
• 7. Genetically Encoded FRET-Based Nanosensor for Insect ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12612880/]
• 8. Fluorescent biosensors illuminating plant hormone research [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8491072/]
• 9. Engineering a ratiometric fluorescent sensor-based tool for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925400524011468]
• 10. Advancements in biosensing of hormones [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165993624000827]
• 11. Designing and Development of FRET-Based Nanosensor ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.621273/full]
• 12. A quantitative gibberellin signaling biosensor reveals a ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48116-4]
• 13. Genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor for insect ... [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5236450]
• 14. An intramolecular FRET biosensor for the detection of SARS ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/nr/d4nr05040a]
• 15. Diversified Dimensionality of Nanomaterials and their ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773045X25000275]
• 16. Strengths and Limitations of Salicylic Acid Reporters [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/21/10610]
• 17. The makings of a gradient: spatiotemporal distribution ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6414749/]
• 18. Sensors for the quantification, localization and analysis of the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7898640/]
• 19. Understanding FRET as a Research Tool for Cellular Studies [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4424985/]
• 20. Nano-enabled biosensors in early detection of plant diseases [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nanotechnology/articles/10.3389/fnano.2025.1545792/full]
• 21. Key Steps to Follow in a FRET Experiment [https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/key-steps-to-follow-in-a-fret-experiment]
• 22. Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensors for Biomedical ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8615007/]
• 23. State-of-the-art in engineering small molecule biosensors ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630323000638]
• 24. Designing and Development of FRET-Based Nanosensor for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8200523/]
• 25. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer [https://www.nature.com/subjects/fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer/ncomms]
• 26. Nanosensor Applications in Plant Science [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/12/9/675]
• 27. An Improved Ratiometric FRET Biosensor with Higher ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/18/5903]
• 28. Universal nanosensor unlocks the secrets to plant growth [https://news.mit.edu/2025/universal-nanosensor-unlocks-plant-growth-secrets-0609]
• 29. Optimization of FRET imaging in Arabidopsis protoplasts [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1016847825000044]
• 30. Smart and sustainable nano-biosensing technologies for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669025002596]
• 31. Progress and Prospects in FRET for the Investigation of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12467375/]
• 32. Utilizing FRET-based Biosensors to Measure Cellular ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11769715/]
• 33. FRET-based reporters for the direct visualization of ... [https://elifesciences.org/articles/01739]
• 34. CarboTag: a modular approach for live and functional ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-025-02677-4]
• 35. Expanding Horizons in Advancements of FRET Biosensing ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12293601/]
• 36. FRET Based Biosensor: Principle Applications Recent ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10136898/]
• 37. A Guide to Fluorescent Protein FRET Pairs - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5038762/]
• 38. FRETpredict: a Python package for FRET efficiency ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-05910-6]
• 39. Exploring the landscape of FRET-based molecular sensors [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0734975024001605]
• 40. Optimization of FRET imaging in Arabidopsis protoplasts [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11879690/]
• 41. FRET or No FRET: A Quantitative Comparison - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1302980/]
• 42. FRET-enhanced photostability allows improved single ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04486-0]
• 43. Label-free impedimetric detection of isopentenyladenine ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1572665725007568]
• 44. Detection and quantification of manganese ions with FRET ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369703X24003978]
• 45. Design Principles of Nanosensors for Multiplex Detection of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12232259/]
• 46. A protocol for high-throughput screening ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37453068/]
• 47. QuanTI-FRET: a framework for quantitative ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62924-w]
• 48. Recent advances in FRET-Based biosensors for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003269721002244]
• 49. Development and Validation of a Spectrofluorimetric ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10445222/]
• 50. 面向细胞显微成像的虚拟染色技术的研究 - 光学仪器 [https://joi.usst.edu.cn/html/2023/1/20230103.htm]
• 51. The advantages and the limitations of LC-MS/MS and Elisa ... [https://www.biotrial.com/bioanalysis-lc-ms-ms-vs-elisa/]
• 52. Fluorescent probes for imaging and detection of plant ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773237123000771]
• 53. Advanced strategies of the in-vivo plant hormone detection [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016599362300273X]
• 54. Comparative LC-MS/MS-based profiling of phytohormones [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1670979/full]
• 55. Comparative LC-MS/MS-based profiling of phytohormones [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12491226/]
• 56. Machine learning-powered activatable NIR-II fluorescent ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60182-w]
• 57. FRET Based Biosensor: Principle Applications Recent ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/8/1375]