Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS): Principles, Current Research, and Strategic Imperatives for Long-Duration Space Missions

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) as essential technologies for sustainable human presence in space. It explores the foundational ecological principles of these closed-loop systems, which integrate producers, consumers, and decomposers to regenerate oxygen, water, and food. The content examines current methodological approaches from international programs, addresses critical troubleshooting challenges for system optimization, and validates technologies through comparative analysis of ground-based and flight experiments. Designed for researchers, scientists, and technology development professionals, this review synthesizes the latest advancements in BLSS research and identifies strategic knowledge gaps requiring urgent investment to enable future Moon and Mars missions.

Ecological Foundations and Historical Development of BLSS

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent a transformative approach to sustaining human life in long-duration space missions by mimicking Earth's natural ecological processes. These closed-loop systems integrate biological and technological components to regenerate air, water, and food through the continuous recycling of waste products. This technical guide examines the core principles, theoretical frameworks, and experimental methodologies underpinning BLSS research and development. As space agencies worldwide prepare for sustained lunar habitation and Mars exploration, BLSS technologies have become increasingly critical for reducing dependence on Earth-based resupply and enabling true operational autonomy in space environments.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are engineered ecosystems designed to sustain human life in isolated environments by regenerating essential resources through biological processes [1]. Unlike physical/chemical life support systems that rely on finite consumables, BLSS create self-sustaining environments where waste products from one species become resources for others, mirroring Earth's biogeochemical cycles [2]. The fundamental objective of BLSS is to achieve maximum closure of mass exchange cycles—particularly for carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen—there dramatically reducing the need for external resupply missions which become prohibitively expensive and complex for long-duration missions beyond low-Earth orbit [3] [4].

The historical development of BLSS has evolved through several decades of research, beginning with early Soviet and American space programs. Notable milestones include the Soviet BIOS-1, BIOS-2, and BIOS-3 projects in the 1960s-1970s [2], NASA's Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems (CELSS) program in the 1980s-1990s [3], the Biosphere 2 project in the 1990s [5], and the European Space Agency's ongoing MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) program [6]. More recently, China's Beijing Lunar Palace has demonstrated significant advancements, supporting a crew of four analog taikonauts for a full year using integrated bioregenerative systems [3]. Current research focuses on optimizing these systems for specific mission profiles, including lunar orbital stations, Martian surface habitats, and potential interstellar voyages.

Core Theoretical Principles of BLSS

Foundational Ecological Concepts

BLSS operation is governed by several interconnected ecological principles that ensure system stability and functionality. At its core, a BLSS is a closed ecological system (CES) that "does not rely on matter exchange with any part outside the system" [2]. This fundamental characteristic necessitates that any waste products generated by one species must be utilized by at least one other species within the system [2]. For instance, human metabolic wastes (carbon dioxide, urine, feces) must be continuously converted into oxygen, food, and water through biological processes performed by other system components.

The principle of mass closure represents perhaps the most critical design requirement for BLSS. In these systems, the mass (food/air/water) required by organisms must be continually recycled from the waste mass produced by those same organisms [7]. While energy and information may be transferred across system boundaries, matter must be conserved and regenerated internally. This closed-loop recycling drastically reduces the need for resupply missions. Research indicates that for missions exceeding two years in duration, it becomes more mass-efficient to regenerate essential substances internally rather than relying on external supplies from Earth [6].

Another foundational concept is autotrophic integration, which stipulates that a closed ecological system "must contain at least one autotrophic organism" [2]. While both chemotrophic and phototrophic organisms are plausible, virtually all BLSS implementations to date have relied on photoautotrophs such as green algae and higher plants [2]. These organisms serve as the primary producers that convert light energy into chemical energy, fixing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen and biomass that support heterotrophic components including humans.

System Architecture and Component Integration

Effective BLSS design requires careful integration of multiple subsystems that perform specific regenerative functions. These systems work synergistically to create a balanced ecosystem that can support human life indefinitely. The major functional components include:

Atmosphere Revitalization Systems manage the critical gaseous exchanges between crew and photosynthetic organisms. Higher plants consume carbon dioxide and produce oxygen through photosynthesis, while simultaneously transpiring water vapor that can be condensed and purified [5] [4]. Microbiological components, such as those in the MELiSSA loop, can further enhance these processes by breaking down carbon dioxide into usable oxygen through specialized bioreactors [6].

Water Recycling Systems recover and purify water from multiple sources, including urine, humidity condensate, and wastewater. These systems employ advanced filtration, sterilization, and sometimes biological processing using constructed wetlands to convert waste water into clean water for drinking, hygiene, and irrigation [5] [4]. In Biosphere 2, for example, wastewater from all human uses and domestic animals was treated and recycled through a series of constructed wetlands, with the resulting water being reused for agricultural irrigation [5].

Food Production Systems typically employ controlled environment agriculture (CEA) techniques such as hydroponics and aquaponics to cultivate edible crops without soil [6]. These systems provide not only nutrition but also contribute to atmospheric regeneration and water purification. Higher plants in BLSS serve multiple functions: they produce edible biomass, generate oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide, recycle water, and contribute to psychological well-being [5] [4].

Waste Processing Systems manage both liquid and solid wastes through biological and physicochemical processes. Microbial communities break down organic matter, while composting systems convert solid waste into nutrient-rich soil amendments [4]. The integration of waste processing directly with food production creates a continuous cycle where "waste" becomes resource, exemplifying the ecological principle of nutrient cycling.

Table 1: Mass Flow Interactions in BLSS Components

System Component	Inputs Received	Outputs Produced	Primary Function
Higher Plants	COâ‚‚, Water, Nutrients, Light	Oâ‚‚, Food, Biomass, Water Vapor	Air revitalization, food production, water transpiration
Microbial Bioreactors	Organic Waste, COâ‚‚	Oâ‚‚, Nutrients, COâ‚‚	Waste processing, gas balancing
Water Recovery System	Wastewater, Humidity	Clean Water, Brine	Water purification, recycling
Human Crew	Oâ‚‚, Food, Water	COâ‚‚, Urine, Feces, Waste Heat	System drivers, operators

BLSS Research Methodologies and Experimental Protocols

BLSS Development Pathway

The research and development of BLSS follows a structured, phased approach that progresses from fundamental component studies to fully integrated system demonstrations. This developmental pathway ensures that technologies mature sufficiently before implementation in human-rated systems [5]. The standard research progression involves:

Unit Process Studies investigate individual biological and physicochemical processes in isolation. These foundational experiments examine specific phenomena such as plant growth in simulated microgravity, microbial waste processing efficiency, or gas exchange rates under various environmental conditions [5]. Research at this stage focuses on optimizing individual parameters before integrating components into more complex systems.

Artificial Ecosystem Research combines multiple biological components to create simplified analog ecosystems. These experiments examine interactions between species and the emergent properties of communities without immediate human application. Examples include aquarium ecospheres and bottle gardens that demonstrate basic principles of closed ecological systems [2].

Integrated System Testing connects biological and technological components into functional loops that approximate full BLSS operation. The MELiSSA project, for instance, has developed a multi-compartment continuous system where the metabolic outputs of one compartment become inputs for another [6]. These integrated tests identify system-level challenges such as feedback dynamics, buffer requirements, and control strategies.

Human-Rated Testing represents the final experimental phase before space implementation. Facilities like Biosphere 2 [5], the Chinese Lunar Palace [3], and earlier Soviet BIOS systems [2] have enabled long-duration human habitation experiments within closed ecological systems. These large-scale tests validate system performance, human factors, and operational protocols with actual crews.

Experimental Protocols for BLSS Component Verification

Protocol 1: Plant Growth Optimization in Controlled Environments

This protocol evaluates the performance of candidate plant species for BLSS applications, measuring key parameters including biomass production, gas exchange rates, and nutritional quality.

• Select candidate species based on nutritional value, growth characteristics, and environmental requirements. Common candidates include wheat, potatoes, lettuce, and soybeans [5].
• Establish controlled growth environments with precise regulation of temperature (20-25°C), relative humidity (60-70%), light intensity (300-600 μmol/m²/s photosynthetically active radiation), photoperiod (16-18 hours light), and COâ‚‚ concentration (1000-1200 ppm) [4].
• Implement cultivation systems using hydroponic or aeroponic techniques with optimized nutrient solutions. The Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) is commonly employed for leafy greens, while deep water culture may be used for larger plants [6].
• Monitor growth parameters daily, including plant height, leaf area, and visible symptoms. Measure biomass accumulation weekly through destructive sampling of representative plants.
• Quantify gas exchange using infrared gas analyzers to measure photosynthetic and transpiration rates. Calculate oxygen production and carbon dioxide consumption per unit area and time.
• Analyze nutritional content at harvest, assessing carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, vitamins, and minerals. Compare with human nutritional requirements for extended space missions.
• Evaluate system inputs including water, nutrients, and energy required per unit of edible biomass produced.

Protocol 2: Water Recycling System Efficiency Testing

This protocol validates the performance of water recovery subsystems in BLSS, focusing on closure of the water cycle and quality of recycled water.

• Configure test stand with wastewater collection, processing units, and storage reservoirs. Systems typically include membrane filters, biological processors, and chemical treatment units [5].
• Prepare input stream simulating crew wastewater, including urine (with appropriate synthetic analogs), humidity condensate, hygiene water, and cleaning solutions.
• Operate system continuously with daily monitoring of key water quality parameters: pH, conductivity, total organic carbon (TOC), ammonia, nitrate, and microbial counts.
• Measure recovery efficiency by comparing input and output volumes, accounting for process losses and water incorporated into biomass.
• Verify water purity through comprehensive chemical and microbiological analysis, ensuring compliance with spaceflight potable water standards.
• Assess system stability through long-duration operation (minimum 90 days) with periodic challenges simulating normal operational variations and potential failure scenarios.

Table 2: Key Performance Metrics for BLSS Subsystems

Subsystem	Performance Metrics	Target Values	Measurement Methods
Plant Growth	Edible biomass yield (g/m²/day)	20-40 g/m²/day (leafy greens) 10-20 g/m²/day (crops)	Destructive sampling, fresh/dry weight
	Photosynthetic rate (μmol CO₂/m²/s)	15-30 μmol/m²/s	Infrared gas analysis
	Water use efficiency (g biomass/L water)	3-6 g/L	Transpiration measurement, mass balance
Atmosphere Revitalization	O₂ production (g/m²/day)	15-25 g/m²/day	Gas exchange measurement
	CO₂ consumption (g/m²/day)	20-35 g/m²/day	Gas exchange measurement
	Gas concentration stability	Oâ‚‚: 19-23%, COâ‚‚: 0.1-0.5%	Continuous gas monitoring
Water Recovery	Water closure rate (%)	>95% recovery	Mass balance calculations
	Contaminant removal efficiency	>99.9% for key pathogens	Chemical/microbiological assay
	Energy efficiency (kWh/L)	<0.1 kWh/L	Power monitoring

Key Technologies and Research Reagents

Essential Research Equipment and Technologies

BLSS research requires specialized equipment to monitor and control the complex interactions within closed ecological systems. The Controlled Closed-Ecosystem Development System (CCEDS) represents an advanced approach that integrates multiple sensor arrays and actuators to maintain system stability [7]. Key technological components include:

Environmental Monitoring Systems track critical parameters including temperature, humidity, light intensity, atmospheric composition (Oâ‚‚, COâ‚‚, trace gases), water quality, and pressure. NASA's CCEDS technology employs cloud-based monitoring of sensor arrays across multiple ecosystems in real time, enabling long-term observation of sustainability experiments [7].

Controlled Environment Chambers provide precise regulation of growth conditions for biological components. These chambers typically include programmable lighting systems (often using LED arrays with specific spectral qualities), temperature and humidity control, COâ‚‚ injection systems, and nutrient delivery mechanisms [4].

Hydroponic and Aquaponic Systems enable soil-less cultivation of plants, which is essential for space applications. These systems include nutrient film technique (NFT) channels, deep water culture (DWC) tanks, aeroponic misters, and associated pumping and aeration equipment [6].

Gas Analysis Equipment monitors the critical gaseous exchanges within BLSS. Infrared gas analyzers measure COâ‚‚ concentrations, while paramagnetic or electrochemical sensors track Oâ‚‚ levels. Gas chromatography systems identify and quantify trace gases that could accumulate to toxic levels in closed environments [5].

Water Quality Monitoring Systems ensure the safety and recyclability of water within BLSS. These systems typically include sensors for pH, conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen, and specific ions. More advanced systems incorporate flow injection analysis or spectrophotometric methods for nutrient monitoring [5].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for BLSS Experiments

Reagent/Category	Function/Application	Specific Examples
Nutrient Solutions	Provide essential minerals for plant growth	Hoagland's solution, Modified Knop's solution, Yamazaki nutrient formula
Microbial Media	Culture beneficial microorganisms for waste processing	R2A agar, Reasoner's 2A broth, specific methanogenic media
Water Quality Testing	Monitor and maintain water purity in closed loops	Hach test kits, HPLC standards for organic contaminants, microbial detection kits
Gas Standards	Calibrate atmospheric monitoring equipment	Certified COâ‚‚ in air standards (100-5000 ppm), Oâ‚‚ in Nâ‚‚ standards (15-25%)
Plant Growth Regulators	Modulate plant development in confined spaces	Gibberellic acid, auxins (IAA, NAA), cytokinins (BA, kinetin)
Sterilization Agents	Control microbial contamination in closed systems	Hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, peracetic acid solutions
Soil/Substrate Analogs	Simulate extraterrestrial growth media	JSC-1A lunar regolith simulant, MMS Mars simulant, baked clay aggregates

Future Research Directions and Challenges

The advancement of BLSS technology faces several significant challenges that represent key research frontiers. Radiation effects on biological systems in deep space remain poorly understood and require extensive investigation [3]. The complex interplay between microgravity or partial gravity and biological processes presents another critical research area, particularly regarding long-term effects on plant growth, microbial community dynamics, and ecological stability [8].

System closure and stability represent ongoing challenges, as achieving and maintaining near-complete closure of mass cycles requires sophisticated control strategies and redundancy. Current research focuses on developing adaptive algorithms that can predict and manage the nonlinear dynamics of these complex systems [7]. The integration of biological and technological systems also needs refinement, particularly in balancing the resilience of biological systems with the reliability of engineered components.

Emerging research directions include the development of biological in-situ resource utilization (BISRU) approaches that would leverage local resources such as lunar or Martian regolith for agricultural purposes [8]. The challenge of Martian soil toxicity, particularly due to perchlorates, requires innovative mitigation strategies for successful surface agriculture [8]. Additionally, personalized BLSS approaches that tailor life support to individual metabolic and nutritional needs represent a promising frontier for optimizing system efficiency.

The geopolitical dimension of BLSS development has gained prominence, with current analysis indicating that "China has surpassed the US and its allies in both scale and preeminence of these emerging efforts and technologies" [3]. This competitive landscape underscores the strategic importance of BLSS research for future leadership in human space exploration. As missions evolve toward "endurance-class" deep space operations, the maturation of bioregenerative life support will become increasingly critical for sustaining human presence beyond Earth orbit.

The development of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represents a critical endeavor for enabling long-duration human space exploration, transitioning from Earth-reliant resupply missions to self-sustaining extraterrestrial habitats. These systems are closed-loop ecosystems that rely on biological processes to regenerate essential resources—including oxygen, water, and food—by recycling waste materials [9] [10]. The historical trajectory of BLSS development has evolved from isolated national programs into increasingly collaborative international efforts, driven by both technical challenges and geopolitical dynamics. This paper examines this evolution through the lens of strategic capability development, analyzing how past decisions continue to shape current capabilities and future prospects for human exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

The Foundation: National Programs (1960s-1990s)

Early American Initiatives

The United States established foundational BLSS research through several key programs beginning in the latter half of the 20th century. The Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems (CELSS) program initiated by NASA served as the cornerstone for American bioregenerative research, focusing on the integration of biological components for resource recovery [11] [3]. This evolved into the Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX), a habitat demonstration program designed to test integrated life support technologies [11]. Concurrently, the NASA Lunar-Mars Life Support System Test Project successfully demonstrated a growth chamber that contributed to air revitalization and food requirements for a crew of four for 91 days [10].

The theoretical foundation for these systems recognized that long-duration space habitation would require simultaneous revitalization of atmosphere, purification of water, and generation of human food, primarily through photosynthetic higher plants and algae, combined with physicochemical and bioregenerative processes for waste recycling [9].

Soviet/Russian Programs

The Soviet Union pursued parallel development through the BIOS series of facilities, beginning with BIOS-1 in 1965 and evolving through more advanced versions (BIOS-2, BIOS-3, and BIOS-3 M) [10]. These facilities established early proof-of-concept for closed ecological systems, with BIOS-3 achieving notable closure experiments during the 1970s. The Russian approach emphasized rigorous mathematical modeling of mass flows within closed systems and pioneered the integration of human crews into these ecosystems for extended durations.

Comparative Analysis of Early National Programs

Table 1: Comparison of Major Historical BLSS Programs

Program	Lead Nation	Time Period	Key Achievements	Primary Focus
CELSS/BIO-PLEX	USA	1980s-2000s	Development of controlled environment agriculture; system integration concepts	Food production & oxygen regeneration
BIOS Series	USSR/Russia	1965-1990s	Human-in-the-loop testing; mathematical modeling of closed ecosystems	Complete ecosystem closure
Biosphere 2	USA	1991-1994	Large-scale integrated ecosystem testing; identified unpredictable closure effects	Earth ecology research & space analog
CEEF	Japan	1990s-2000s	Integration of animal & plant compartments; gas balance monitoring	Balanced ecosystem development

The Transition Period: Strategic Shifts and Their Consequences (2000-2010)

A pivotal transition occurred in the early 2000s, when strategic priorities and funding allocations dramatically shifted. In 2004, following the release of NASA's Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS), the agency made the consequential decision to discontinue and physically demolish the BIO-PLEX habitat demonstration program [11] [3]. This decision reflected a strategic pivot toward physical/chemical life support systems and away from comprehensive bioregenerative approaches.

The consequences of this strategic shift were profound. With the United States stepping back from BLSS development, leadership in this critical domain transferred internationally. China's space program strategically absorbed and advanced the very technologies that NASA had discontinued [11]. Published NASA BIO-Plex plans subsequently supported the China National Space Administration's (CNSA) efforts to rapidly establish a bioregenerative habitat technology program, which materialized in the form of the Beijing Lunar Palace [11] [3].

During this same period, the European Space Agency established the Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) program in 1989, focusing on BLSS component technology through international collaboration across research institutions [12] [10]. However, this program never approached the comprehensive closed-systems human testing pursued by other nations.

The Contemporary Landscape: Internationalization and Capability Gaps

China's Ascendancy in BLSS Development

China has emerged as the global leader in bioregenerative life support technology through systematic, sustained investment. The Beijing Lunar Palace (Lunar Palace 1) program has achieved remarkable milestones, including supporting a crew of four analog taikonauts for a full year within a closed-system environment that successfully demonstrated atmosphere, water, and nutrition recycling [11] [3] [13].

The Lunar Palace 365 project (2017-2018) represented a particularly significant achievement, with eight volunteers completing a 370-day mission in the LP1 facility divided into three phases with crew rotations [13]. This project provided invaluable data on system stability, microbial dynamics, and human factors in prolonged isolation.

Current International Initiatives

The contemporary landscape features two major international lunar exploration initiatives with distinct partnerships and technological approaches:

• Artemis Accords (led by NASA and the U.S. State Department): With 55 signatory countries as of June 2025, this framework extends the 1967 Outer Space Treaty principles while emphasizing international cooperation and private sector participation [11] [3].

• International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) (led by China and Russia): Established as a competing vision for lunar exploration and utilization, with BLSS technology representing a cornerstone capability [3].

Table 2: Comparison of Current BLSS-Related International Initiatives

Initiative	Leading Agencies	Primary BLSS Approach	Key BLSS Assets	Notable Achievements
Artemis Program	NASA & international partners (ESA, JAXA)	Primarily physical/chemical with bioregenerative research	Planned bioregenerative components	Ongoing research; limited integrated testing
ILRS	CNSA & Roscosmos	Comprehensive bioregenerative systems	Lunar Palace 1 & expansions	370-day closed human habitation mission
MELiSSA	ESA & international partners	Component-focused bioregenerative technology	MELiSSA Pilot Plant (MPP), PaCMan	Compartmentalized testing; no full human integration

Persistent Technological Gaps

The transition away from BLSS research has created significant capability gaps for the United States and its partners. Currently, no official programs outside China are pursuing a fully integrated, closed-loop bioregenerative architecture for establishing lunar or Martian habitats [11] [3]. The European Space Agency's MELiSSA program, while productive, remains focused on component technology rather than integrated system demonstration [11].

These gaps pose strategic risks for future "endurance-class" deep space missions, particularly regarding knowledge of deep space radiation effects on biological systems and the scaling of bioregenerative solutions to support multi-year missions without resupply [11].

Experimental Methodologies in BLSS Research

Ground-Based Analog Testing

BLSS development relies extensively on ground-based analog facilities that simulate space mission conditions while allowing for controlled experimentation and system validation. The Lunar Palace 365 experiment exemplifies this approach, with its 160 m² facility containing multiple integrated compartments: two plant cabins, a comprehensive cabin (with private bedrooms, living room, bathroom, and insect culturing room), and a solid waste treatment cabin [13].

The standard methodology involves:

• Long-duration human occupancy with monitoring of physiological and psychological parameters
• Comprehensive mass balance accounting tracking inputs and outputs of air, water, and waste streams
• Microbial community monitoring to assess system stability and crew health risks
• Crop production evaluation measuring yield, resource utilization efficiency, and nutritional quality

Microbial Community Analysis

Understanding microbial dynamics in closed systems represents a critical BLSS research area, with implications for both system functioning and crew health. The methodology typically includes:

• Sample Collection: Air dust samples collected via high-efficiency particulate absorbing (HEPA) filters at multiple locations and time points throughout the mission [13].
• DNA Extraction: Microbial community DNA extraction from collected samples using standardized kits.

• Sequencing and Analysis:

  • 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to characterize bacterial community diversity and composition
  • Shotgun metagenomic sequencing to assess functional potential
  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR) to determine absolute abundances of specific microbial targets, including antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [13]

• Data Interpretation: Source tracking analysis to identify origins of airborne microbes (e.g., human-associated vs. plant-associated).

Plant Compartment Research

The plant compartment represents a fundamental BLSS element, requiring species-specific optimization. Research methodologies include:

• Species Selection: Evaluation based on nutritional value, resource requirements, edible-to-waste biomass ratio, and growth characteristics [10].
• Controlled Environment Agriculture: Precise management of temperature, light, humidity, COâ‚‚, and nutrient delivery.
• Performance Metrics: Measurement of photosynthetic efficiency, gas exchange rates, biomass production, and resource consumption.
• Alternative Species Investigation: Research on non-traditional organisms like aquatic bryophytes (mosses) for specialized functions such as biofiltration [12].

BLSS System Architecture and Compartment Flows

The fundamental architecture of a BLSS consists of interconnected compartments that exchange materials in a closed-loop fashion. The system can be visualized through its mass flows and functional relationships:

BLSS Material Flow Architecture

This diagram illustrates the fundamental material exchanges between BLSS compartments, showing how waste outputs from one compartment become resource inputs for another, creating a sustainable closed-loop system.

Essential Research Reagents and Materials

BLSS experimentation requires specialized reagents and materials to monitor system performance and crew health. The following table details key research solutions used in contemporary BLSS investigations:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for BLSS Experimentation

Reagent/Material	Primary Function	Application Example	Technical Specifications
HEPA Filters	Airborne microbial particle collection	Microbial community analysis in habitat air [13]	0.3 micron particle retention
DNA Extraction Kits	Microbial community DNA isolation	Metagenomic analysis of air/ surface samples [13]	Compatibility with complex environmental samples
16S rRNA Primers	Bacterial community profiling	Amplicon sequencing of habitat microbiomes [13]	Target V3-V4 hypervariable regions
qPCR Assays	Absolute quantification of specific genes	Antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) monitoring [13]	Include standard curves for quantification
Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging System	Photosynthetic efficiency measurement	Plant health monitoring under BLSS conditions [12]	Capable of Fv/Fm and ΦPSII measurements
Controlled Environment Growth Chambers	Precise plant growth condition maintenance	Crop optimization studies [10]	Temperature, humidity, light, COâ‚‚ control
Aquatic Bryophyte Cultures	Biofiltration and resource regeneration	Alternative biological component research [12]	Taxiphyllum barbieri, Leptodictyum riparium

The historical evolution of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems from national programs to international efforts reveals critical insights about technological leadership in space exploration. Early investments by the United States through the CELSS and BIO-PLEX programs established foundational capabilities that were subsequently discontinued, creating strategic gaps that have been exploited by other nations, particularly China. The current international landscape features distinct pathways—with China demonstrating clear leadership in integrated system testing through achievements like the Lunar Palace 365 mission, while the United States and its partners maintain more fragmented research programs.

Future progress in BLSS development will require reinvigorated international collaboration, sustained investment in integrated ground demonstrations, and resolution of key technical challenges related to system closure, microbial management, and radiation effects on biological systems. The historical pattern suggests that nations which strategically prioritize and consistently fund BLSS capabilities will likely determine the future of sustained human presence beyond Earth orbit.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are closed-loop systems that rely on biological processes to regenerate essential resources and recycle waste, which is critical for sustaining long-duration human space missions [12]. The development paths of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the China National Space Administration (CNSA) have significantly diverged in this field, creating a distinct strategic geopolitical context. This divergence has profound implications for leadership in human space exploration and the feasibility of future endurance-class missions to the Moon and Mars.

The core function of a BLSS is to achieve a high degree of closure, defined as the percentage of total required resources provided by recycling, thereby reducing dependency on resupply from Earth [14]. This paper examines how historical decisions, funding priorities, and international policies have shaped the current BLSS capabilities of both space agencies, with CNSA having operationalized technologies that NASA once pioneered but later discontinued.

Historical Context and Strategic Divergence

The Foundation and Shift in NASA's BLSS Program

NASA's foundational work in BLSS began with the Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems (CELSS) program, which logically evolved into the ambitious Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) habitat demonstration program [15]. The BIO-PLEX was designed as an integrated, closed-loop habitat testbed for advancing controlled environment agriculture (CEA) to achieve logistical biosustainability for exploration, echoing the goals of even earlier concepts like the 1959 Project Horizon for a lunar base [15].

A critical turning point occurred following the 2004 Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS), which led to the discontinuation and physical demolition of the BIO-PLEX facility [15]. This decision effectively terminated NASA's most advanced integrated BLSS program and marked a strategic shift away from bioregenerative approaches toward reliance on physical/chemical (P/C) life support systems and resupply for the International Space Station (ISS). This shift created a strategic capability gap that has persisted for two decades.

CNSA's Strategic Adoption and Advancement

Concurrent with NASA's retreat from BLSS, the China National Space Administration embarked on a systematic program to develop and mature these very technologies [15]. CNSA synthesized the discontinued NASA research, other international efforts, and domestic innovation to create a robust BLSS initiative. This strategic adoption is most visibly embodied in the Beijing Lunar Palace, a ground-based analog habitat that has successfully demonstrated closed-system operations for atmosphere, water, and nutrition, sustaining a crew of four analog taikonauts for a full year [15].

Table: Historical Timeline of Key BLSS Program Decisions

Year	NASA Action	CNSA Action	Impact on BLSS Development
Pre-2004	Development of CELSS and BIO-PLEX programs	Monitoring international research and initial planning	NASA held leadership position; CNSA in learning phase
2004	Discontinuation of BIO-PLEX post-ESAS	Initiation of domestic BLSS development based on NASA research	Critical divergence point; NASA creates strategic gap
2011	Wolf Amendment restricts bilateral cooperation	Accelerated independent development	Reinforced divergence, limited potential for knowledge exchange
2020s	Focus on P/C systems for Artemis	Operational demonstration of year-long crewed BLSS mission in Lunar Palace	CNSA achieves demonstrated leadership in integrated BLSS

Current Capability Landscape

Analysis of NASA's Current Posture

NASA's current approach, particularly for the Artemis program and the ISS, relies heavily on resupply of food, water, and other consumables for Physical/Chemical-based Environmental Closed Loop Life Support Systems (ECLSS) [15]. While the ISS's ECLSS processes some water and controls COâ‚‚, it remains a largely open-loop system requiring considerable resupply [14]. The agency's research focus has narrowed, with no current official program pursuing a fully integrated, closed-loop bioregenerative architecture for lunar or Martian habitats [15].

The European Space Agency's (ESA) MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) program represents a moderate but productive allied effort focused on BLSS component technology, though it has not approached closed-systems human testing at the scale of CNSA's efforts [15].

Analysis of CNSA's Current Posture

CNSA has established a clear lead in both the scale and preeminence of BLSS efforts [15]. The successes of the Beijing Lunar Palace have provided CNSA with invaluable operational data and have validated their bioregenerative technologies for atmosphere revitalization, water recovery, and food production. Published plans from CNSA indicate that these advancements are a core component of their long-term strategy for a sustained human presence on the Moon [15].

This capability directly supports China's broader lunar ambitions, including the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) project, positioning BLSS not merely as a life support technology but as a strategic asset for establishing a permanent extraterrestrial presence.

Table: Comparative Agency Capabilities in BLSS (as of 2025)

Capability Metric	NASA	CNSA	Implications
Integrated BLSS Testing	No current integrated human-testing program	Operational demonstration with 4 crew for 1 year (Lunar Palace)	CNSA possesses validated data for system scaling and crew psychology
Food Production System	Research & development stage; not mission-critical	Integrated and demonstrated as primary life support component	CNSA has reduced logistics burden for long-duration missions
Closed-Loop Water & Air	Relies on P/C systems (ISS); BLSS in R&D	Bioregenerative closure demonstrated in analog habitat	CNSA technology path may offer higher sustainability for bases
Lunar Mission Integration	Not part of initial Artemis architecture	Core to announced long-duration lunar habitation plans	Strategic divergence in mission sustainability and operational tempo

Technical Methodologies in Modern BLSS Research

Experimental Framework for Novel BLSS Components

Recent research has expanded beyond traditional higher plants and algae to investigate non-vascular plants like aquatic bryophytes (mosses) as multifunctional biofilters and resource regenerators. The following methodology, derived from a 2025 study, provides a template for evaluating new biological components for BLSS [12] [16].

1. Research Objective: To characterize the potential of three aquatic bryophytes—Taxiphyllum barbieri (Java moss), Leptodiccyum riparium, and Vesicularia montagnei (Christmas moss)—as biofilters and resource regenerators in BLSS by assessing their physiological and biofiltration performance under controlled conditions [12].

2. Experimental Organisms and Cultivation:

• Species Selection Rationale: T. barbieri for wide adaptability; L. riparium for tolerance to extreme environments; V. montagnei for high surface-area density [12].
• Cultivation Conditions: Specimens are purchased semi-axenic and maintained under two controlled environment regimes to test performance across different potential BLSS configurations [12].

3. Controlled Environment Parameters:

• Condition A (High Light): 24°C and 600 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹.
• Condition B (Low Light): 22°C and 200 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ [12] [16].

4. Key Performance Metrics and Measurement Protocols:

• Gas-Exchange Capacity: Measure photosynthetic rate (COâ‚‚ uptake) and transpiration rate to quantify oxygen production and water recycling potential.
• Chlorophyll Fluorescence: Use pulse-amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorometry to determine the quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII), a key indicator of photosynthetic efficiency and plant health under stress.
• Antioxidant Activity Profiling: Quantify concentrations of antioxidant compounds (e.g., via ORAC assay) to assess the organism's capacity to withstand oxidative stress, a critical factor for space radiation environments.
• Biofiltration Efficiency: Expose moss specimens to aqueous solutions containing known concentrations of nitrogen compounds (e.g., ammonia, nitrates) and heavy metals (e.g., Zinc). Biofiltration efficiency is calculated as the percentage removal of target contaminants over a defined period, analyzed via spectrophotometry or ICP-MS.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table: Essential Reagents and Materials for BLSS Component Evaluation

Research Reagent / Material	Function in BLSS Experimentation
PAM Fluorometry System	Measures chlorophyll fluorescence to quantify photosynthetic efficiency and photochemical stress in plant candidates.
Gas Exchange Chamber (IRGA)	Precisely monitors COâ‚‚ uptake and Oâ‚‚ release rates to determine gas exchange performance of biological components.
ORAC Assay Kit	Quantifies oxygen radical absorbance capacity, evaluating antioxidant strength for radiation stress tolerance screening.
ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry)	Detects and quantifies trace heavy metal uptake (e.g., Zn, Cd) for assessing biofiltration remediation capabilities.
Semi-axenic Bryophyte Cultures	Provides standardized, contaminant-controlled plant material for reproducible physiological and biofiltration studies.
Controlled Environment Growth Chambers	Maintains precise temperature, humidity, and light levels to simulate different BLSS operational scenarios.
Btffh	Btffh | High-Purity Reagent | For Research Use
MPPG	MPPG | mGluR Antagonist | For Research Use Only

Geopolitical Factors and Future Trajectories

The Impact of the Wolf Amendment

Enacted in 2011, the Wolf Amendment prohibits NASA from using government funds for direct, bilateral cooperation with the Chinese government and China-affiliated organizations, including CNSA, without explicit authorization from the FBI and Congress [17]. This legislative barrier has systematically limited scientific exchange between American and Chinese researchers in space science, creating a one-way barrier that has reinforced the divergent development paths.

While the amendment includes provisions for case-by-case certifications for activities that do not risk transfer of sensitive technology, it has cast a chilling effect on collaboration [17]. The legislation has been criticized within the scientific community as a "deplorable 'own goal' by the US," as it limits access for U.S. researchers to groundbreaking materials, such as the lunar samples returned by China's Chang'e-6 mission from the far side of the Moon [17].

Competing International Visions

The divergence in BLSS development is set against the backdrop of two competing international lunar exploration frameworks:

• The Artemis Accords: Led by NASA and the U.S. State Department, based on the 1967 Outer Space Treaty and focusing on shared principles for exploration and resource utilization [15].
• The International Lunar Research Station (ILRS): Led by China and Russia, with CNSA's demonstrated BLSS capabilities forming a foundational technological pillar for its long-duration habitation plans [15].

These frameworks represent not only different operational models but also divergent philosophies on sustaining human life in space, with the U.S. favoring a more traditional resupply-based model in the near term, while China pursues a bioregenerative self-sufficiency model.

The diverging paths of NASA and CNSA in Bioregenerative Life Support Systems research represent a critical strategic inflection point in human space exploration. CNSA's focused investment and demonstration of integrated BLSS, leveraging research from discontinued NASA programs, has provided it with a tangible technological advantage in a field essential for long-duration missions and sustainable planetary habitats.

The strategic gap in U.S. BLSS capabilities poses a significant risk to the long-term viability and leadership of NASA and its partners in the Artemis Accords in the emerging era of lunar exploration and beyond. For the United States to maintain international competitiveness and ensure a sustainable pathway for endurance-class human space exploration, it is both necessary and urgent to address these gaps through renewed program investments, strategic international partnerships with allies, and a recommitment to the development of mature, flight-ready bioregenerative technologies.

The functioning of both natural ecosystems on Earth and artificial environments in Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) hinges on the interplay of three fundamental biological components: producers, consumers, and decomposers. These groups form the foundation of ecological trophic levels, creating a hierarchical structure that facilitates the flow of energy and the cycling of nutrients essential for sustaining life [18]. In BLSS, which are engineered to support human life in space through closed-loop resource regeneration, replicating and optimizing these ecological roles is paramount for achieving system sustainability [19]. These systems are designed to minimize resupply needs from Earth by regenerating oxygen, water, and food through biological processes while recycling waste, thereby creating an artificial ecosystem based on ecological principles [20] [19].

The integration of these biological components represents a critical advancement over purely physicochemical life support systems, particularly for long-duration missions beyond low Earth orbit where resupply becomes economically and technically unfeasible [10] [21]. Organisms within BLSS not only provide multiple life support functions but also possess the ability to reproduce and self-repair, enabling continuous system operation with minimal external input [21]. This whitepaper examines the specific roles, functions, and interactions of producers, consumers, and decomposers within the context of BLSS, providing a technical guide for researchers and scientists engaged in the development of robust life support systems for space exploration.

Producers: The Foundation of Ecosystems and BLSS

Definition and Core Function

Producers, or autotrophs, are organisms that form the base of all ecological trophic pyramids by synthesizing their own food through photosynthesis or chemosynthesis [22] [18]. Through photosynthesis, the most common mechanism relevant to BLSS, producers convert light energy, carbon dioxide (CO₂), and water (H₂O) into chemical energy in the form of glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆) and release oxygen (O₂) as a byproduct [18]. The simplified chemical equation for this process is:

$$ 6CO2 + 6H2O + light \ energy \rightarrow C6H{12}O6 + 6O2 $$

This process not only sustains the producers themselves but also generates the organic matter and oxygen that support all other trophic levels within the ecosystem [22]. In BLSS, producers simultaneously perform multiple essential functions: they revitalize atmosphere by liberating oxygen and fixing carbon dioxide, purify water through transpiration, and generate food for human crew members [9] [10].

Key Organisms and BLSS Applications

In terrestrial ecosystems, producers primarily include green plants, algae, and certain bacteria [18]. In BLSS design, producer selection is guided by mission-specific parameters including duration, available volume, power constraints, and nutritional requirements [10].

Table: Producer Organisms in BLSS Research and Applications

Organism Type	Specific Examples	Primary Functions in BLSS	Mission Relevance
Leafy Greens	Lettuce (Lactuca sativa), Kale	Oxygen production, water purification, supplemental nutrition, psychological benefits	Short-duration missions, LEO platforms [10]
Staple Crops	Wheat (Triticum aestivum), Potato, Rice, Soy	Calorie provision, macronutrient production (carbohydrates, proteins), extensive oxygen generation	Long-duration missions, planetary outposts [10] [23]
Microalgae	Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris	Atmospheric revitalization, water recycling, potential food source	Compact systems, auxiliary life support [19]
Fruiting Vegetables	Tomato, Peppers, Beans	Nutritional diversity, phytonutrient provision, psychological value	Medium to long-duration missions [10]

The "vegetable production unit" or "salad machine" concept, designed to supplement astronaut diets with fresh produce, exemplifies the application of producers in near-term missions [10]. For long-duration missions and permanent planetary outposts, staple crops such as wheat, potato, and rice become essential to provide the necessary carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, contributing substantially to overall resource recycling [10].

Experimental Protocols for Producer Research

Protocol 1: Measuring Photosynthetic Efficiency in Controlled Environments This protocol is critical for optimizing plant growth and gas exchange in BLSS.

• Plant Material Selection: Select candidate species (e.g., lettuce, wheat) based on nutritional value and resource requirements [10].
• Environmental Control: Establish growth chambers with precise control of light intensity (PPFD: 200-600 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), spectral quality, COâ‚‚ concentration (800-1200 ppm), temperature (22-26°C), and relative humidity (60-70%) [10].
• Gas Exchange Measurement: Utilize infrared gas analyzers (IRGA) to measure net COâ‚‚ uptake and Oâ‚‚ evolution rates. Calculate photosynthetic efficiency as the quotient of assimilated carbon to incident light energy [23].
• Biomass Analysis: Harvest plants at maturity and measure fresh and dry weight to determine biomass production efficiency (g MJ⁻¹) [23].
• Data Application: Use results to model contributions to atmospheric revitalization and food production, informing crop selection and cultivation system design for specific mission scenarios [10].

Consumers: Energy Transfer and Ecosystem Dynamics

Definition and Classification

Consumers, or heterotrophs, are organisms that cannot produce their own energy and must consume other organisms to obtain energy and nutrients [22] [18]. In BLSS, the primary consumers are the human crew members, though other consumer organisms may be incorporated for additional food sources or ecosystem services [23]. Consumers are categorized based on their feeding habits and position in the food chain:

• Primary Consumers (Herbivores): Organisms that consume producers as their energy source. In BLSS, this can include insects or fish cultivated for protein [23].
• Secondary Consumers (Carnivores): Organisms that consume primary consumers. In most BLSS designs, this role is filled by humans, though some systems may incorporate pest control organisms [22].
• Omnivores: Organisms that consume both producers and other consumers. Humans are the quintessential omnivores in BLSS [18].

In the context of BLSS, consumers play a critical role in transferring energy from one trophic level to the next, though this transfer is inherently inefficient, with only about 10% of energy passed from one level to the next due to energy lost as heat during metabolic processes, incomplete consumption, and energy expended in movement and growth [18].

In BLSS, the human crew constitutes the primary consumer group, driving the system's resource requirements. Research focuses on meeting human nutritional needs while minimizing resource inputs. Recent BLSS research has explored integrating insect consumers as a sustainable protein source. Species such as house crickets (Acheta domesticus), yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor), and silkworms (Bombyx mori) show promise due to their nutritional value, feed conversion efficiency, and ability to utilize organic waste streams [23]. These organisms can serve as primary consumers (herbivores) or decomposers (detritivores), providing multifunctional roles within the system.

Table: Consumer Organisms in BLSS Research

Consumer Type	Examples	Trophic Level	BLSS Function	Considerations
Human Crew	Astronauts	Omnivore (Primary & Secondary)	System driver, waste production	Nutritional requirements, psychological health, metabolic outputs [19]
Insects	Acheta domesticus, Tenebrio molitor	Primary Consumer (Herbivore/Detritivore)	Protein production, waste processing	Nutritional profile, growth rate, system compatibility [23]
Fish	Tilapia, Other Aquaponics Species	Primary/Secondary Consumer	Protein production, nutrient cycling	Space requirements, water quality management [10]

The inclusion of non-human consumers remains a subject of ongoing research. While insects offer efficient protein conversion and waste utilization capabilities, they are significantly underrepresented in BLSS literature compared to plant producers, with only about one animal-focused paper published annually versus 4.7 plant-related papers [23].

Experimental Protocols for Consumer Research

Protocol 2: Evaluating Insect Species as Sustainable Protein Sources in BLSS This protocol assesses the viability of insect consumers for resource-efficient protein production.

• Species Selection: Select candidate insect species (e.g., Acheta domesticus, Tenebrio molitor) based on nutritional profile, feed conversion efficiency, and space requirements [23].
• Diet Formulation: Develop diets based on BLSS-generated biomass (crop residues, food waste) and measure consumption rates.
• Growth Performance Monitoring: Track key metrics including: specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate.
• Nutritional Analysis: Analyze macronutrient and micronutrient composition of harvested insects.
• Waste Output Characterization: Quantify and characterize frass production for integration with decomposer subsystems.
• System Integration Assessment: Evaluate compatibility with other BLSS components.

Decomposers: The Nutrient Recycling Engine

Definition and Critical Function

Decomposers, primarily bacteria and fungi, are organisms that break down dead organic material and waste products, returning essential nutrients to the ecosystem in forms usable by producers [22] [18]. This decomposition process is vital for nutrient cycling, ensuring that elements like nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon are continuously recycled rather than locked in dead biomass [18]. In BLSS, decomposers transform human waste, inedible plant biomass, and other organic wastes into mineral nutrients that can be reused by plants, thereby closing the nutrient loop [10] [19].

Functions of decomposers include:

• Break down dead organisms and waste products
• Release nutrients back into the soil and water
• Help maintain soil fertility and structure [18]

Without decomposers, ecosystems would accumulate dead material, nutrient cycling would cease, and the entire food web would eventually collapse due to nutrient depletion [22] [18]. In BLSS, this function is typically facilitated by microbial bioreactors that efficiently process waste streams while minimizing volume and energy requirements [10].

BLSS Applications and Microbial Communities

Decomposers in BLSS perform the critical function of recycling organic wastes, including inedible plant biomass, food waste, and human metabolic wastes, into inorganic nutrients that can be taken up by plants [19]. The Microbial Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) project, for instance, employs a series of interconnected bioreactors containing specific microbial communities to degrade organic waste and recover nutrients [10]. These engineered microbial communities are designed to mimic the nutrient cycling functions of natural decomposers while operating reliably in controlled environments.

Advanced BLSS concepts explore the use of "soil-like substrates" produced through aerobic fermentation and earthworm treatment, creating a more complex decomposition environment that can enhance nutrient availability and plant growth [19]. The interplay between microbial decomposers and physicochemical waste processing systems is an active area of research, aiming to achieve robust and efficient nutrient recycling with minimal energy input and operational complexity.

Integrated System Dynamics in BLSS

Energy Flow and Nutrient Cycling

In a fully integrated BLSS, producers, consumers, and decomposers form an interconnected network where the outputs of one compartment serve as inputs for another, creating a closed-loop system [10] [19]. Energy flows unidirectionally from producers to various levels of consumers and finally to decomposers, while nutrients cycle continuously between these compartments [18]. This integration can be represented through food chains and more complex food webs that illustrate the multifaceted feeding relationships within the ecosystem [18].

The efficiency of energy transfer between trophic levels is a critical design parameter for BLSS. With only approximately 10% of energy transferred from one trophic level to the next, system design must prioritize shortening food chains and selecting highly efficient producer-consumer relationships to maximize overall system efficiency [18]. This inefficiency explains why most BLSS designs emphasize plant-based diets for human crew members, as introducing animal intermediates reduces the total calories available from the same initial photosynthetic output [10].

Trophic Relationships and System Integration

The following diagram illustrates the integrated relationships and resource flows between the core biological components of a BLSS:

BLSS Integration and Resource Flows

This diagram illustrates the circular flow of resources within a BLSS, where waste outputs from one process become inputs for another, minimizing external resource requirements. The system's closure is maintained through biological processes that continuously regenerate vital resources from waste streams [19].

Research Tools and Methodologies

Essential Research Reagents and Materials

BLSS research requires specialized materials and reagents to study and optimize the biological components of these closed ecosystems. The following table details key research solutions essential for experimental investigations in this field:

Table: Key Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Component Investigation

Reagent/Material	Composition/Specifications	Primary Research Application	BLSS Relevance
Hydroponic Nutrient Solutions	Balanced macro/micronutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, etc.)	Plant growth optimization, nutrient uptake studies	Producer compartment nutrient delivery [10]
Microbial Culture Media	Specific media for nitrifying bacteria, decomposer fungi	Decomposer functionality, waste processing optimization	Degradation of organic waste into plant-available nutrients [10]
Gas Analysis Standards	Certified COâ‚‚, Oâ‚‚, CHâ‚„ calibration gas mixtures	Atmospheric composition monitoring, photosynthetic/respiratory gas exchange	Tracking gas fluxes between system compartments [19]
DNA/RNA Extraction Kits	Commercial kits for microbial/plant molecular analysis	Microbial community characterization, plant gene expression	Monitoring system health and organism responses [23]
Insect Artificial Diets	Defined formulations with varying protein/carbohydrate ratios	Insect growth performance, waste conversion efficiency	Evaluating insects as secondary consumers/protein source [23]

Experimental Workflow for BLSS Component Integration

The following diagram outlines a systematic experimental workflow for evaluating the integration of new biological components into a BLSS:

BLSS Component Testing Workflow

This workflow emphasizes the iterative nature of BLSS development, where biological components must be evaluated at multiple levels of integration before being validated for space applications [10] [19]. The process highlights the importance of ground-based testing in high-fidelity analogs before proceeding to space-based validation, acknowledging the significant differences between terrestrial and space environments that can affect biological performance [19].

The successful implementation of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems for long-duration space missions depends on the sophisticated integration of producers, consumers, and decomposers into a stable, self-sustaining artificial ecosystem. Current research has established a strong foundation in producer biology, with significant knowledge gaps remaining regarding the integration of consumer organisms and the optimization of decomposition processes under space conditions. Future BLSS development will require enhanced focus on multifunctional species that can fulfill multiple roles within the system, advanced monitoring and control systems for maintaining ecological balance, and rigorous testing under space-relevant environmental conditions. By applying ecological principles to engineered systems, BLSS research promises to enable long-term human presence in space while simultaneously advancing our understanding of sustainable life support on Earth.

The pursuit of long-duration human space exploration necessitates technologies that can sustainably support life millions of miles from Earth. Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) encompass the technologies required to maintain a habitable environment for astronauts, providing essential functions including atmosphere revitalization, water recovery, and waste management [24]. Within this domain, two primary philosophical and technical paradigms have emerged: Physicochemical Life Support Systems (PCLSS) and Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) [24]. A deeper understanding of the theoretical progression from early concepts to modern implementations is crucial for guiding future research and deployment.

The fundamental distinction between these paradigms lies in their core operating principles. PCLSS relies on physical and chemical processes to recycle air, water, and waste. These systems, which are currently operational aboard the International Space Station, are characterized by high efficiency, reliability, and rapid processing times. However, they are not indefinitely sustainable due to their dependence on consumable materials and limited capacity for food production [24]. In contrast, BLSS utilizes biological organisms—such as plants, algae, and microbes—to regenerate life-sustaining resources from waste products. Although these systems can operate more slowly and require more volume, they hold the promise of long-term sustainability and reduced resupply requirements, making them essential for missions to the Moon and Mars [24] [3].

A significant subtype of BLSS is the Closed Ecological Life Support System (CELSS). This framework represents an ambitious endeavor to create a self-sustaining, closed-loop ecosystem within a spacecraft by integrating a diverse array of living and non-living elements. A CELSS aims to mimic Earth's biosphere, where natural processes create a harmonious, self-regulating environment that recycles air, water, and waste while producing food [24]. The historical development of these concepts shows a strategic evolution, with NASA's early CELSS program and subsequent BIO-PLEX initiative paving the way for current advancements, most notably demonstrated by the China National Space Administration's (CNSA) Beijing Lunar Palace, which has sustained crews for extended durations [3].

Core Theoretical Principles and System Components

The CELSS Framework: Mimicking Earth's Biosphere

The CELSS framework is fundamentally rooted in ecological engineering, aiming to replicate the closed-loop material cycles of Earth's biosphere on a small scale. The core theoretical principle is the creation of a closed-material loop where waste products from one subsystem become resources for another, minimizing or eliminating the need for external inputs [24]. This approach goes beyond mere life support; it seeks to create a complex, synergistic system where biological and physicochemical components interact to create a robust and resilient habitat.

Early theoretical work and simulation models, including mass-balance studies, were critical for understanding the stoichiometry of such systems. These models detailed the flows of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen necessary for the production of plant biomass (both edible and inedible), human consumption, and the processing of human waste [25]. For instance, a steady-state system with wheat as a sole food source was modeled to calculate the precise daily fluxes of these elements required to support a human, thereby defining the theoretical foundation for closed-system operation [25]. The CELSS approach leverages ecosystem archetypes, such as wetland marshes, which are proficient at multiple ecosystem services including air purification, water filtration, and carbon sequestration within anoxic sediments [24].

The Evolution to BLSS/BLiSS: A Modular, Hybrid Approach

The evolution from CELSS to modern Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS or BLiSS) reflects a pragmatic shift from attempting to replicate entire ecosystems to engineering manageable, highly reliable biological components. The modern BLSS theory often embraces a modular, loop-connected architecture [3]. This is exemplified by the European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) program, which is based on interconnected compartments, each housing specific organisms (e.g., nitrifying bacteria, photosynthetic algae, higher plants) that utilize waste from other compartments as essential resources [12]. This compartmentalization enhances system control and stability.

A key theoretical advancement in modern BLSS is the move toward hybrid systems that integrate the best features of both bioregenerative and physicochemical technologies. While biological systems excel at regenerating air, water, and producing food, some physical systems offer more precise, rapid control over certain environmental parameters [24]. For example, a BLSS might use plants for oxygen production and carbon dioxide removal but employ a physical system for rapid temperature and humidity control, which lacks efficient biological solutions [24]. This hybrid approach balances the long-term sustainability of biological systems with the predictability and control of physicochemical systems, thereby mitigating the risks associated with either approach used in isolation.

Comparative Analysis of System Components

The theoretical differences between PCLSS, BLSS, and CELSS become concrete when examining how each addresses the core components of a life support system. The table below provides a detailed comparison of the methodologies employed by each paradigm for critical life support functions.

Table 1: Comparison of Component Technologies Across Life Support System Paradigms

Component	PCLSS (e.g., ISS)	BLSS	CELSS
Atmosphere Control & Supply	Gas storage tanks, adsorption/scrubbing; careful monitoring [24].	Control of photosynthesis rate in plants/algae; limited trace gas removal [24].	Control of photosynthesis; soil bed reactors act as microbial air filters for enhanced gas processing [24].
Oxygen Generation	Electrolysis of water [24].	Photosynthesis by plants in growth chambers or algae in photobioreactors [24].	Photosynthesis by plants and algae within a diverse ecosystem; must account for oxygen consumption by decomposers/animals [24].
Carbon Dioxide Removal	Adsorption using materials like zeolite [24].	Absorption by plants/algae during photosynthesis [24].	Absorption via photosynthesis; wetlands excel at sequestering carbon in anoxic underwater biomass [24].
Water Recovery	Physical filtration and chemical treatment of wastewater, including urine distillation [24].	Use of liquid waste as dilute fertilizer for plants/algae; mechanical and biological filtration [24].	Application of waste to wetlands; filtration through integrated mechanical and biological systems [24].
Waste Management	Solid waste stored for disposal; liquid waste processed via Water Recovery System (WRS) [24].	Composting or breakdown by aerobic/anaerobic bacteria in digesters; resulting compost used for plant growth [24].	Use of wetlands as natural recyclers of human solid and liquid waste [24].
Food Production	Supply of pre-packaged meals with long shelf life [24].	Grown in controlled agricultural environments (e.g., hydroponics, aeroponics) [24].	Produced within interconnected ecosystems; supports symbioses (e.g., aquaculture) for recycling inedible biomass [24].

Quantitative Frameworks and Modeling

The design and prediction of BLSS behavior rely heavily on quantitative modeling to ensure mass balance and system stability. Early foundational work established the biochemical stoichiometry for key processes, calculating the daily mass flows of elements required to sustain a human in a closed system. The following table summarizes the mass balance for a simplified wheat-based system, which formed the basis for more complex dynamic simulations [25].

Table 2: Example Mass Balance for a Wheat-Based BLSS (grams/person/day) [25]

Component	Formula	Human Intake	Human Output	To Waste Processor
Carbon	C	301.66	-	301.66
Hydrogen	H	42.75	-	42.75
Oxygen	O	476.06	-	476.06
Nitrogen	N	11.46	-	11.46
Other (Ash)	-	19.97	-	19.97
Water (Hâ‚‚O)	-	1211.00	1211.00	-
Urine Solids	-	-	56.70	56.70
Feces Solids	-	-	29.48	29.48
Wash Water Solids	-	-	21.77	21.77

Modern modeling has evolved to incorporate advanced data analysis techniques. Quantitative data analysis, powered by descriptive and inferential statistics, is used to analyze structured, numerical data from system experiments, measuring differences between groups and assessing relationships between variables [26] [27]. Furthermore, machine learning models are now being applied to predict the behavior of complex biological systems. For example, hybrid models like SA-CNN-BiLSTM (Self-Attention Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory) demonstrate high accuracy in forecasting environmental variables such as water quality, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.955 in dissolved oxygen prediction [28]. These models efficiently extract deep features from time-series data and use attention mechanisms to weight key time steps, reducing prediction errors and providing a sophisticated tool for managing the dynamic nature of BLSS [28].

Experimental Research and Novel Biological Components

A Methodology for Evaluating Novel Biofilters

Research into new biological components is vital for advancing BLSS capabilities. A recent study investigating aquatic bryophytes (mosses) as biofilters and resource regenerators provides a robust experimental protocol [12].

Research Objective: To characterize the potential of three aquatic moss species—Taxiphyllum barbieri (Java Moss), Leptodictyum riparium, and Vesicularia montagnei (Christmas Moss)—as multifunctional biological components in BLSS, assessing their photosynthetic performance and biofiltration efficiency [12].

Experimental Protocol:

• Species Selection & Cultivation: Acquire semi-axenic cultures of the three moss species and maintain them in controlled aquatic environments [12].
• Environmental Conditions: Subject the species to at least two distinct controlled condition sets to evaluate adaptability (e.g., Condition A: 24°C and 600 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹; Condition B: 22°C and 200 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹) [12].
• Performance Metrics:
  • Gas-Exchange: Measure rates of COâ‚‚ uptake and Oâ‚‚ production to quantify atmospheric regeneration capacity [12].
  • Chlorophyll Fluorescence: Use parameters such as Fáµ¥/Fₘ to assess the functional status and maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II, indicating plant health and photosynthetic performance [12].
  • Antioxidant Activity: Analyze antioxidant profiles to evaluate the physiological resilience of the mosses to stress [12].
  • Biofiltration Efficiency: Quantify the removal rates of specific contaminants from water, including nitrogen compounds (e.g., total ammonia nitrogen) and heavy metals (e.g., Zinc) [12].
• Data Analysis: Employ statistical analysis (e.g., descriptive statistics, ANOVA) to identify significant differences in performance between species and conditions, determining the most suitable candidates for BLSS integration [12].

Table 3: The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents and Materials for Bryophyte BLSS Research

Item	Function in Research Context
Semi-axenic moss cultures (T. barbieri, L. riparium, V. montagnei)	Provides the foundational biological material for testing; axenic status reduces confounding variables from other microbes [12].
Controlled Environment Growth Chambers	Enables precise manipulation and maintenance of environmental variables such as temperature, light intensity, and photoperiod [12].
Pulse-Amplitude Modulated (PAM) Fluorometer	The key instrument for measuring chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, providing a non-invasive assessment of photosynthetic health and efficiency [12].
Gas Exchange System	Measures the rates of carbon dioxide absorption and oxygen production by the mosses, directly quantifying their air revitalization potential [12].
Analytical Chemistry Equipment	Used to quantify the concentration of specific contaminants (e.g., ammonia, heavy metals) in water before and after moss treatment to determine biofiltration efficiency [12].

Key Findings and Research Outcomes

The experimental results demonstrated a clear divergence in specialist functions among the species, highlighting the value of biodiversity in BLSS design. Taxiphyllum barbieri exhibited the highest photosynthetic efficiency and pigment concentration, marking it as a primary candidate for oxygen regeneration [12]. In contrast, Leptodictyum riparium showed the most effective removal of nitrogen compounds and heavy metals like Zinc, suggesting a complementary role as a specialized water purifier [12]. Vesicularia montagnei contributed valuable data on adaptability. These findings support the utilization of a consortium of bryophytes, rather than a single species, to enhance the overall efficiency and functional robustness of closed-loop ecological systems [12].

System Architecture and Functional Relationships

The logical relationships between human inhabitants, biological components, and engineering systems within a BLSS can be visualized as a network of interdependent processes. The following diagram outlines the core functional workflow and material flows of a generalized BLSS.

The experimental methodology for evaluating biological components, such as aquatic mosses, involves a structured workflow from preparation to data analysis. The diagram below details this multi-stage experimental protocol.

The theoretical journey from the comprehensive, ecosystem-based CELSS framework to the more modular and pragmatic modern BLSS concepts reflects a maturation of the field. This evolution is guided by quantitative mass-balance models, advanced data analysis, and rigorous experimental research into novel biological components like aquatic bryophytes. The current state of the art points toward hybrid systems that leverage the strengths of both bioregenerative and physicochemical technologies to create robust, reliable, and sustainable life support systems. For future "endurance-class" deep space missions, closing the gap between theoretical models and operational, human-rated systems remains the critical challenge. Strategic investment in integrated ground demonstrations is the necessary next step to mature these essential technologies for sustaining human life beyond Earth [3].

System Architectures and Biological Component Integration

A Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS) is an artificial closed ecosystem designed to sustain human life in space by regenerating critical resources through biological processes. By integrating producers (plants), consumers (humans/animals), and decomposers (microorganisms), a BLSS can recycle oxygen, water, and food, while processing waste, thereby minimizing the need for external supplies [19]. This technology is a critical enabler for long-duration missions beyond Earth, such as lunar outposts or Mars bases, where resupply from Earth is impractical [20]. The core principle of a BLSS is to mimic Earth's own geomicrobiological ecosystem within a controlled, engineered environment [29].

This whitepaper provides a technical analysis of three pioneering BLSS programs: the European Space Agency's MELiSSA, China's Lunar Palace, and NASA's BIO-PLEX. These programs represent distinct methodological approaches to solving the fundamental challenge of maintaining long-term, self-sufficient human habitation in space.

Comparative Analysis of International BLSS Programs

The following table summarizes the key characteristics, technological approaches, and achievements of the MELiSSA, Lunar Palace, and BIO-PLEX programs.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Major BLSS Programs

Program Feature	MELiSSA (ESA)	Lunar Palace (CNSA)	BIO-PLEX (NASA)
Lead Agency/Country	European Space Agency	China National Space Administration	National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA)
Primary Structure	Loop of interconnected bioreactors [30] [29]	Integrated cabins: Plant, Living, Waste Treatment [31]	Planned habitat test complex with integrated subsystems [15]
Key Biological Components	Specific microbial strains, photoautotrophs (e.g., Spirulina) [29]	Higher plants (cereals, vegetables), mealworms, microorganisms [13] [31]	Planned: Higher plants and microorganisms for CEA [15]
Waste Processing Method	Microbial biotransformation in staged bioreactors [29]	Composting, bioreduction, urine recovery [13] [31]	Planned: Hybrid physicochemical and biological processing [15]
Control Strategy	Deterministic, knowledge-based control and mathematical modeling [30]	Not explicitly detailed in results	Not explicitly detailed in results
Notable Milestones	Extensive compartment modeling and control strategy development [30]	105-day and 370-day crewed missions; >98% material closure [20] [31]	Program and facility canceled post-2004 [15]
System Status	Ongoing research, component testing [15]	Operational ground-based testbed, successful long-duration missions [20] [15]	Program discontinued, facility demolished [15]

MELiSSA Program Methodology

System Architecture and Design Principles

The Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA), developed by the European Space Agency, is designed as a closed loop of interconnected bioreactors, each performing a specific biochemical function [29]. Its architecture is inspired by an aquatic ecosystem and is intended to completely recycle gas, liquid, and solid wastes. A fundamental design principle of MELiSSA is the implementation of a deterministic control strategy, which is a prerequisite for its sustainable operation, in contrast to the stochastic control of Earth's biosphere [30]. This approach requires a thorough mathematical understanding and modeling of every unit operation within the system.

Core Functional Compartments

The MELiSSA loop is structured into several discrete compartments, each with a specialized microbial population or biological agent:

• Liquefying Compartment: This first compartment breaks down solid organic waste (e.g., inedible plant biomass, human waste) through thermophilic anaerobic fermentation. The process yields volatile fatty acids, carbon dioxide, and ammonium [29].
• Photoheterotrophic Compartment: Here, the products of liquefaction are further oxidized by photosynthetic bacteria, such as Rhodospirillum rubrum, under light conditions. This step is crucial for removing organic contaminants and fixing carbon dioxide [29].
• Nitriflying Compartment: In this stage, chemolithoautotrophic bacteria, like Nitrosomonas europaea, perform the nitrification process, converting ammonium into nitrites and then nitrates, which are more readily available forms of nitrogen for plants [29].
• Photoautotrophic Compartment: This compartment utilizes algae, specifically Spirulina platensis (a cyanobacterium), or higher plants. The photoautotrophs consume carbon dioxide from crew respiration and the preceding compartments, produce oxygen via photosynthesis, and generate edible biomass for the crew. Spirulina also demonstrates the ability to process and purify urine [29].

The interface between the control strategy of the entire system and the individual bioreactors is a critical area of research, ensuring the stable and efficient operation of the integrated loop [30].

Experimental & Modeling Protocols

The MELiSSA methodology relies heavily on mathematical modeling and control theory. The development process for each compartment involves:

• Isolated Bioreactor Studies: Individual compartments are studied in isolation to achieve a deep understanding of their dynamics, including microbial population kinetics, substrate consumption rates, and product formation.
• Fundamental Model Development: First-principles models, based on mass and energy balances, are developed to describe the dynamic behavior of each unit operation [30].
• System Integration and Control: The individual compartment models are integrated to simulate the entire MELiSSA loop. This allows for the study of complex interactions and feedback mechanisms, and for the development of a knowledge-based global control strategy that manages the entire ecosystem [30].

Lunar Palace Program Methodology

System Architecture and Design Principles

Lunar Palace 1 (Yuegong-1) is China's first ground-based BLSS test facility, developed by Beihang University. It is an integrated system designed to provide a long-duration, self-contained mission environment with no outside inputs other than energy [31]. The system is notable for achieving a high degree of material closure, reported at over 98% during its "Lunar Palace 365" mission, which involved a 370-day crewed experiment [20]. Its architecture is based on the synergistic integration of humans, plants, animals, and microorganisms within a multi-compartment habitat.

Core Functional Compartments

The Lunar Palace 1 facility comprises three main types of cabins, each with a dedicated function:

• Plant Cabins (PC): Two cabins host the cultivation of a variety of crops. The selection includes five cereals (wheat, corn, soybeans, peanuts, lentils), 15 vegetables (e.g., carrots, cucumbers, water spinach), and one fruit (strawberries) [31]. These plants are the primary producers, generating oxygen and food while consuming carbon dioxide and recycling water through transpiration.
• Comprehensive Cabin (CC): This cabin houses the human crew and includes private bedrooms, a living room, a bathroom, and an insect culturing room. The insect room is used for producing yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.), which serve as the crew's primary source of animal protein, thereby closing the protein loop in the diet [31].
• Solid Waste Treatment Cabin (SC): This compartment handles the biotransformation of solid waste. Crew waste and inedible plant matter are processed through composting and bioreduction techniques, converting them into resources that can be reintroduced to the plant cabins, thus closing the nutrient loop [13] [31].

Key Experimental Protocols

The "Lunar Palace 365" project provided a robust methodology for studying system dynamics and microbial ecology. A key experimental focus was the monitoring of the airborne microbial community (microbiome) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for BLSS Microbiome Analysis

Research Reagent / Tool	Function in BLSS Research
HEPA Filter Sampler (e.g., Xiaomi Air Purifier)	Collection of air dust samples for subsequent DNA extraction and analysis of airborne microbiomes [13].
16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing	Profiling the bacterial community composition and diversity in environmental samples (e.g., air, surfaces) within the BLSS [13].
Shot-gun Metagenomic Sequencing	Functional potential analysis of microbial communities and investigation of the presence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) and Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs) [13].
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)	Absolute quantification of total bacterial load and specific target genes, such as ARGs, in environmental samples from the BLSS [13].

Detailed Microbiome Monitoring Workflow:

• Sample Collection: Air dust samples are systematically collected from designated locations (e.g., Plant Cabin, Comprehensive Cabin) at different time points and across different crew shifts using HEPA filter-based air samplers [13].
• DNA Extraction: Total genomic DNA is extracted from the collected dust samples using commercial kits, providing the template for subsequent molecular analyses [13].
• Multi-Omics Analysis:
  • 16S rRNA Sequencing: The extracted DNA is amplified using primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene and sequenced. The resulting data is processed through bioinformatics pipelines (e.g., QIIME) to identify microbial taxa and assess community diversity [13].
  • Metagenomic Sequencing: The DNA is also subjected to shot-gun sequencing without prior amplification. The resulting sequences are assembled and annotated against functional databases to determine metabolic potential and screen for ARGs and virulence factors [13].
  • qPCR Quantification: Specific primer sets are used to quantify the abundance of total bacteria and specific ARGs (e.g., tet(K) for tetracycline resistance) using SYBR Green or TaqMan chemistry on a real-time PCR machine [13].
• Data Integration: Microbial community data is integrated with operational parameters (e.g., crew changeovers) to understand the factors driving microbial succession. Source tracking analysis is performed to determine the origin (human, plant, etc.) of airborne microbes [13].

BIO-PLEX Program Methodology

System Architecture and Historical Context

The Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) was a NASA program initiated to develop and demonstrate integrated, ground-based test facilities for advanced life support systems [15]. It represented the culmination of earlier research, including the Controlled Ecological Life Support System (CELSS) program, which focused on advancing controlled environment agriculture (CEA) for logistically sustainable space exploration [15]. The BIO-PLEX facility was conceived as a platform to test and integrate technologies for biomass production, food processing, waste processing, and air and water recovery within a closed-loop, bioregenerative architecture.

Technical Approach and Legacy

Although the BIO-PLEX program was discontinued and its facility demolished following NASA's Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) in 2004, its planned methodology and design outputs were influential [15]. The program was intended to be a habitat-scale demonstration of a hybrid life support system, combining biological and physicochemical components. Its approach was systems-oriented, aiming to bridge the gap between individual technology development (e.g., a single plant growth chamber) and a fully integrated habitat capable of supporting a human crew for long durations. The cancellation of BIO-PLEX created a strategic capability gap in the U.S. approach to BLSS, which has since been addressed by other nations, notably China, which incorporated aspects of the BIO-PLEX research into its own Lunar Palace program [15].

The methodologies of MELiSSA, Lunar Palace, and BIO-PLEX illustrate the diverse yet convergent engineering approaches to BLSS. MELiSSA exemplifies a highly controlled, compartmentalized bioreactor approach. In contrast, Lunar Palace demonstrates the success of an integrated, cabin-based ecosystem that incorporates higher plants, insects, and robust microbiological monitoring. The legacy of BIO-PLEX serves as a reminder of the critical importance of sustained investment in integrated testing facilities. The principles derived from these international programs—deterministic control, ecological integration, and systematic microbiological management—form the foundational knowledge required to move from Earth-based simulations to functional life support systems on the Moon and Mars. Future development will depend on closing the remaining technological gaps and conducting experiments in the actual space environment to validate these Earth-born principles [20] [15].

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent the forefront of sustainable human habitation technology for deep space exploration. These systems leverage higher plant compartments to regenerate air and water, produce food, and recycle waste, creating a closed-loop ecosystem. This whitepaper provides a technical examination of BLSS plant growth technologies, from small-scale "salad machine" hydroponics to the cultivation of environmental staple crops. We present comparative performance data, detailed experimental protocols for key cultivation methodologies, and visualization of system workflows, framed within the context of current capabilities and strategic investments in bioastronautics. The development of robust BLSS technology is not merely an engineering challenge but a strategic imperative for maintaining leadership in the new era of space exploration [3].

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are engineered ecosystems designed to sustain human life in space by using biological processes, particularly photosynthesis, to regenerate resources. Within a BLSS, the higher plant compartment is a critical subsystem responsible for air revitalization through COâ‚‚ absorption and Oâ‚‚ production, water purification via transpiration, food production, and waste recycling. The concept transforms exploration from a paradigm of total resupply to one of logistical biosustainability [3].

The historical development of BLSS has been marked by significant shifts in investment and focus. NASA's pioneering Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems (CELSS) program and the subsequent Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) were discontinued in the early 2000s [3]. This has created a strategic capability gap, which other nations have since addressed. Notably, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) has established a commanding lead through programs like the Beijing Lunar Palace, which has demonstrated the ability to sustain a crew of four analog taikonauts for a full year using a closed-loop bioregenerative system [3]. For the US and its allies to compete in the emerging domain of endurance-class deep space missions, urgent investment in BLSS technology, particularly in higher plant compartments, is both necessary and strategic.

Plant Compartment Classifications and Performance Metrics

Higher plant compartments within a BLSS can be categorized by their technological maturity, primary function, and scale. "Salad machines" typically refer to small-scale hydroponic or aeroponic units designed for fast-growing leafy greens to supplement crew diet and morale. In contrast, systems for staple crops focus on caloric sustainability through the production of grains, legumes, and tubers, requiring more sophisticated environmental control and larger spatial footprints.

Table 1: BLSS Plant Compartment Classification and Key Characteristics

Compartment Type	Example Species	Primary Function	Technology Readiness Level (TRL)	Key Environmental Controls
Leafy Greens (Salad Machines)	Lettuce, Arugula, Spinach, Mizuna [32] [33]	Dietary variety, micronutrients, O₂ production, water transpiration	High (7-9)	Temp: 65-75°F (18-24°C); Light: 12-16 hrs/day; Hydroponic nutrient solution [32]
Fruiting Crops	Cherry Tomatoes, Cucumbers, Sweet Peppers [32]	Dietary variety, some calories, psychological benefits	Medium (5-7)	Temp: 70-78°F (21-26°C); Light: 14+ hrs/day; Hand-pollination required; Higher potassium/phosphorus needs [32]
Staple Caloric Crops	Potato, Sweet Potato, Wheat, Rice [3]	Caloric sustainability, bulk Oâ‚‚ production, COâ‚‚ sequestration	Low to Medium (3-5)	Demands highly precise and robust control of light, temperature, humidity, and nutrient levels; larger growth volume required.

The performance of these compartments is quantified using standardized metrics essential for system engineering and trade studies.

Table 2: Key Quantitative Performance Metrics for BLSS Plant Compositions

Performance Metric	Definition	Importance in BLSS	Representative Values for Leafy Greens
Edible Biomass Yield	Mass of edible produce per unit area per unit time (g/m²/day)	Directly impacts food sufficiency and system closure	Arugula: First harvest in ~4 weeks; multiple harvests possible [32].
Gas Exchange Rates	Photosynthetic O₂ production and CO₂ consumption rates (mol/m²/day)	Critical for atmospheric regeneration	Driven by light intensity and photoperiod; requires monitoring of CO₂ levels to prevent inhibition [34].
Water Transpiration Rate	Mass of water transpired per unit area per unit time (kg H₂O/m²/day)	Key for water recovery loop	High relative humidity (40-60%) is maintained, but excessive humidity can reduce transpiration and cause physiological disorders [32] [34].
Harvest Index	Ratio of edible biomass to total above-ground biomass	Measure of cultivation efficiency	High for leafy greens; lower for staple crops with inedible structural biomass.
Time to Maturity	Days from seed germination to first harvest	Determines production cycle turnover	Lettuce: as little as 3 weeks; Mizuna: ~35 days [32] [33].

Experimental Protocols for BLSS-Relevant Plant Cultivation

Protocol: Hydroponic Cultivation of Leafy Greens (NFT System)

This protocol details the nutrient film technique (NFT) for cultivating lettuce and arugula, a foundational method for "salad machine" operations [32].

1. System Setup and Preparation: - Growing Channel: Assemble sloped channels to allow a thin film of nutrient solution to flow. A common slope is 1:30 to 1:50. - Reservoir and Pump: Connect the channels to a reservoir equipped with a submersible pump. The reservoir should be light-proof to prevent algal growth. - Growing Medium: Fill net pots with a sterile, inert medium such as rockwool or peat moss plugs to support the seedlings [32].

2. Nutrient Solution Formulation: - Base Solution: Use a balanced, water-soluble fertilizer suitable for leafy greens, typically high in nitrogen. - EC and pH: Adjust the Electrical Conductivity (EC) to 1.2-1.8 mS/cm and pH to 5.5-6.0. Monitor and adjust daily. - Topping Up: Maintain solution level in the reservoir. Replace the entire solution every 1-2 weeks to prevent nutrient imbalance and pathogen buildup.

3. Seeding and Germination: - Sow 2-3 seeds directly into each pre-soaked rockwool plug. - Maintain a high-humidity environment (≥70% RH) and a temperature of 68-72°F (20-22°C) under light for germination.

4. System Operation and Monitoring: - Lighting: Provide 12-16 hours of light per day using LED grow lights with a spectrum rich in blue and red wavelengths [32]. A Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density (PPFD) of 200-400 μmol/m²/s is typical. - Temperature: Maintain air temperature between 65-75°F (18-24°C) [32]. - Nutrient Flow: Operate the pump on a continuous or intermittent cycle (e.g., 15 minutes on, 45 minutes off) to ensure root zone aeration.

5. Harvesting: - For "cut-and-come-again" harvests, use sterile scissors to remove outer leaves 1-2 inches above the crown when leaves are 4-6 inches long, allowing the center to continue growing [32] [33]. - For whole-head harvest, remove the entire plant from the net pot.

Protocol: In-Vitro Propagation of Staple Crop Germplasm

Plant tissue culture (micropropagation) is critical for maintaining pathogen-free germplasm banks of staple crops and for the production of uniform plantlets in a confined BLSS environment [35].

1. Laboratory Setup: - Aseptic Transfer Area: Perform all culture work in a laminar flow hood sterilized with UV light and 70% ethanol. - Culture Room: Maintain cultures in growth chambers or rooms with controlled temperature, humidity, and light. Standard conditions are 25±2°C, 16-hour photoperiod, and a PPFD of 50-100 μmol/m²/s from cool-white fluorescent or LED lamps [34] [35].

2. Explant Selection and Surface Sterilization: - Explant: Select a suitable tissue, such as a shoot tip or nodal segment (0.5-1.0 cm) from a healthy, disease-free mother plant. - Sterilization: Immerse explants in 70% ethanol for 30-60 seconds, followed by immersion in a 10-20% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution (commercial bleach) with 1-2 drops of Tween-20 surfactant for 10-15 minutes. - Rinsing: Rinse the explants 3-5 times with sterile distilled water to remove all traces of sterilant.

3. Culture Medium Preparation: - Basal Medium: Use a standard formulation like Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, containing essential macro/micronutrients, vitamins, and sucrose (30 g/L) as a carbon source. - Gelling Agent: Add phytagel or agar (6-8 g/L) to solidify the medium. - Growth Regulators: For the multiplication stage, add a cytokinin (e.g., 6-Benzylaminopurine / BAP at 0.5-2.0 mg/L) to promote shoot proliferation. Adjust pH to 5.7 before autoclaving at 121°C for 15-20 minutes.

4. Culture Initiation and Incubation: - Aseptically place the sterilized explant onto the prepared medium in a culture vessel (e.g., Petri dish or Magenta box). - Seal vessels with gas-permeable lids or microporous tape to allow for gaseous exchange, which is critical to prevent hyperhydricity (vitrification) [34]. - Inculate cultures in the growth room under the conditions specified in Step 1.

5. Subculture and Rooting: - Subculture: Every 4-6 weeks, transfer developing shoots to fresh multiplication medium to maintain growth and expand stock. - Rooting: For the final stage, transfer individual shoots to a rooting medium, often containing an auxin like Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) at 0.1-1.0 mg/L, to induce root formation before acclimatization.

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow and critical control points for the in-vitro propagation protocol.

Diagram 1: In-vitro Propagation Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Successful experimentation in higher plant compartments requires a suite of specialized reagents and materials. The following table details essential components for both hydroponic and tissue culture methodologies.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Plant Research

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Technical Notes
Hydroponic Nutrient Solution	Provides essential mineral elements for plant growth in a soil-less system.	Formulations are crop-specific (e.g., high N for greens; high P/K for fruiting). Requires monitoring of EC and pH [32].
Murashige and Skoog (MS) Basal Salt Mixture	The standard basal medium for plant tissue culture, providing macro and micronutrients.	Often supplemented with vitamins, sucrose, and plant growth regulators for specific applications [35].
Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)	Hormones used to direct plant development in vitro (e.g., organogenesis, rooting).	Cytokinins (BAP): Promote shoot proliferation. Auxins (IBA, NAA): Promote root initiation [35].
Agar or Phytagel	Polysaccharide gelling agents used to solidify tissue culture media.	Provides physical support for explants; concentration affects medium hardness and water availability.
Surface Sterilants (Ethanol, Sodium Hypochlorite)	Used to decontaminate explants and equipment prior to in-vitro culture.	Critical for establishing aseptic cultures. Concentration and exposure time must be optimized to balance sterilization and explant viability [35].
Gaseous Environment Control	Managing COâ‚‚, Oâ‚‚, and ethylene levels within the plant growth chamber or culture vessel.	High COâ‚‚ inhibits growth in light; high ethylene causes hyperhydricity. Gas-permeable filters on vessels are used for exchange [34].
LED Grow Light Systems	Provides photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) with customizable spectra.	Energy-efficient and cool-running. Spectrums can be tuned to optimize growth stages (e.g., blue for compact growth, red for flowering) [32].
Dhlnl	Dhlnl | Lignan Metabolite | Research Compound	Dhlnl, a mammalian lignan metabolite. Explore its research applications in inflammation and metabolism. For Research Use Only. Not for human consumption.
Nekal	Nekal, CAS:12653-75-7, MF:C16H19O3S-, MW:291.4 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

System Integration and BLSS Architecture

Integrating a higher plant compartment into a full BLSS architecture requires careful management of mass and energy flows. The plant subsystem interfaces directly with the crew habitation module, the waste processing system, and the central control unit. A critical challenge is balancing the gas exchange: crew respiration produces COâ‚‚ for plant photosynthesis, while plant transpiration provides a source of clean water for the crew. Managing these dynamic biological processes, which operate on different diurnal cycles (human vs. plant metabolism), requires robust control algorithms and sensor networks. The following diagram outlines the core logical relationships and mass flows in a simplified BLSS architecture.

Diagram 2: BLSS Mass Flow and Control Logic

Higher plant compartments are the biological cornerstone of advanced Bioregenerative Life Support Systems, enabling a transition from resource resupply to sustainable, long-duration human presence in space. The technology spectrum, from "salad machines" to staple crop production, reflects a gradient of increasing complexity and life-support closure. Current research must focus on closing the technology gaps in staple crop cultivation, optimizing system-level resource loops, and automating environmental controls.

The strategic landscape of BLSS development has shifted dramatically. The CNSA's demonstrated success with the Beijing Lunar Palace, derived in part from discontinued NASA programs like BIO-PLEX, underscores a significant capability and leadership gap [3]. To ensure international competitiveness and enable the future of endurance-class human space exploration, it is imperative for the US and its allies to make critical, sustained investments in BLSS research and development. This includes funding for ground-based testbeds, flight experiments on the Lunar Gateway and Artemis surface missions, and interdisciplinary research in plant space biology, advanced life support engineering, and closed-loop system control. The path to a sustainable human future in deep space runs directly through the controlled environments of higher plant compartments.

In the context of long-duration human space exploration beyond low Earth orbit, such as missions to the Moon and Mars, Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are essential for reliable air, water, and food supply for the crew [36]. These systems aim to mimic Earth's natural cycles by using biological processes to regenerate resources. A key technological component within a BLSS is the photobioreactor (PBR), a controlled environment for cultivating photosynthetic microorganisms like microalgae and cyanobacteria [36]. This technical guide explores the role of PBRs in gas and water recycling, focusing on their function in air revitalization—the removal of toxic carbon dioxide (CO₂) and production of oxygen (O₂)—and the processing of aqueous waste streams [36]. The integration of these biological systems is a critical principle for achieving the self-sufficiency required for sustained human presence in space.

Core Principles and Quantitative Performance of Photobioreactors

Photobioreactors are engineered to optimize the growth of photosynthetic organisms. The core principle involves using light energy to drive the conversion of COâ‚‚ and water (often containing recycled nutrients) into biomass and oxygen. The design of a PBR directly influences key performance metrics, including gas exchange rates, biomass productivity, and system resilience.

The table below summarizes the performance data of different photobioreactor types and species as reported in recent research.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Different Photobioreactor Systems

Photobioreactor Type	Species Cultivated	Key Performance Metric	Reported Value	Reference
Open Thin-Layer Cascade (Lab & Pilot Scale)	Microchloropsis salina	COâ‚‚ Fixation Yield	High yield reported (specific value in source)	[37]
Open Thin-Layer Cascade (Lab & Pilot Scale)	Microchloropsis salina	Lipid Productivity	Increased by one magnitude vs. literature	[37]
Open Raceway (Hatchery Scale)	Nannochloris spp.	Cell Density	19.37 ± 1.31 × 10⁶ cells mL⁻¹	[38]
Open Raceway (Hatchery Scale)	Phaeodactylum spp.	Cell Density	1.41 ± 1.31 × 10⁶ cells mL⁻¹	[38]
Open Raceway (Hatchery Scale)	Nannochloris spp.	Culture Duration / Cycle	59 days	[38]
Open Raceway (Hatchery Scale)	Phaeodactylum spp.	Culture Duration / Cycle	19 days	[38]

The choice of organism is equally critical. Different strains offer varied advantages in terms of growth rate, environmental tolerance, and nutritional composition, which in turn affects their efficiency in a BLSS.

Table 2: Characteristics of Select Microalgae Species for BLSS

Species	Reported Protein Content	Reported Lipid Content	Reported Carbohydrate Content	Notable Characteristics	Reference
Nannochloris spp.	~42%	~15%	~11%	High growth rate; contains nervonic acid; adaptable to salinity changes.	[38]
Phaeodactylum tricornutum	Information not specified in search results	Omega-3 EPA (14-32%)	Information not specified in search results	Relevant for nutritional value in BLSS.	[38]

Experimental Protocols for PBR Operation

To ensure reproducible and reliable results in PBR research, standardized experimental protocols are essential. The following methodologies detail the cultivation and analysis processes for PBR systems.

Protocol for Continuous Cultivation in Open Thin-Layer Cascade Photobioreactors

This protocol is adapted from research on the energy-efficient production of Microchloropsis salina with high COâ‚‚ fixation yield [37].

• PBR Setup and Sterilization: Configure the open thin-layer cascade PBR system. The "thin-layer" design refers to a shallow flow of culture medium to maximize light penetration. Sterilize the reactor and all associated tubing, pumps, and sensors using an approved method (e.g., chemical sterilant or steam).
• Inoculum Preparation: Pre-culture the target microalgae strain (e.g., Microchloropsis salina) in a sterile medium until it reaches the mid-exponential growth phase. Determine the biomass concentration.
• Reactor Inoculation: Transfer the inoculum to the main PBR vessel to achieve the desired initial biomass concentration. Use sterile technique to prevent contamination.
• System Operation:
  • Mode: Operate in continuous mode. Continuously add fresh, sterile culture medium to the reactor at a predetermined dilution rate using a peristaltic pump. Simultaneously, harvest an equivalent volume of culture from the outflow to maintain a constant working volume.
  • COâ‚‚ Supply: Continuously sparge a COâ‚‚-enriched air mixture (e.g., 1-5% COâ‚‚ in air) into the culture. The gas flow rate should be controlled and monitored to maintain a target dissolved COâ‚‚ level and provide mixing.
  • Environmental Control: Maintain temperature and illumination at optimal levels for the specific species. For simulated Mediterranean summer climate, this is typically >25°C and high light intensity. Monitor pH continuously.
• Process Monitoring and Data Collection:
  • Biomass Concentration: Take daily samples to measure optical density (OD) at a specific wavelength (e.g., 750 nm) and/or dry cell weight.
  • Gas Analysis: Periodically analyze the inlet and outlet gas streams using a gas analyzer to determine Oâ‚‚ production and COâ‚‚ consumption rates.
  • Nutrient Analysis: Measure the concentration of key nutrients (e.g., nitrates, phosphates) in the inflow and harvest stream to track nutrient uptake and recycling efficiency.
• Harvesting and Downstream Processing: The harvested culture is directed to a separation unit (e.g., centrifuge, tangential flow filter) to concentrate the biomass for further analysis or use.

Protocol for Mass Culture in Open Raceway Photobioreactors

This protocol is based on the evaluation of a raceway PBR for mass culture of microalgae for aquaculture, a system with parallels to BLSS food production [38].

• System Preparation: Fill the raceway tank (e.g., 12 m long, 2 m wide, 0.5 m high) with the culture medium. The system typically includes a central division and a paddlewheel to generate a continuous flow of water (e.g., 1.25 m/s).
• Inoculation: Introduce the axenic microalgae strain (e.g., Nannochloris spp. or Phaeodactylum spp.) into the raceway at the recommended initial cell density.
• Culture Management:
  • Mixing: Operate the paddlewheel continuously to ensure homogeneous distribution of cells, nutrients, and gases, and to prevent sedimentation.
  • Gas Exchange: COâ‚‚ can be supplied by surface diffusion or, for enhanced efficiency, through a dedicated sparging line placed in the flow path of the raceway.
  • Nutrient Supplementation: Based on daily monitoring, add nutrients to the medium to prevent limitation and sustain high-density growth.
  • Contamination Control: Monitor the culture regularly under a microscope for signs of contamination by other microorganisms (e.g., ciliates, rotifers, competing algal species).
• Monitoring: Sample the culture daily to measure cell density using a haemocytometer or particle counter. Track the culture's reproductive cycle and note the time to reach maximum cell density.
• Harvest: Once the culture reaches the target cell density, a portion of the culture is harvested for use (e.g., as a food source in a BLSS). The system can be run in a semi-continuous mode by harvesting a fraction of the culture daily and replacing it with fresh medium.

System Workflow and Integration in BLSS

The integration of photobioreactors into a larger BLSS is complex, involving multiple interconnected physical and biological processes. The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow and the critical relationships between system components.

Diagram 1: PBR Integration in a BLSS

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Successful research and development of photobioreactor systems for BLSS rely on a suite of essential materials and reagents. The table below details key components of a researcher's toolkit.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for PBR Experiments

Reagent / Material	Function / Explanation	Example / Note
Microalgae/Cyanobacteria Strains	The core biological component for gas exchange and biomass production. Selected for efficiency, hardiness, and nutritional value.	Chlorella, Spirulina, Nannochloris, Phaeodactylum [36] [38].
Defined Culture Medium	A sterile aqueous solution providing essential macro and micronutrients for optimal microbial growth.	F/2 medium for marine species, BG-11 for freshwater cyanobacteria. Composition is critical for reproducible growth.
COâ‚‚ Gas Supply	The primary carbon source for photosynthesis, enabling the conversion of inorganic carbon into biomass.	Typically supplied as a mixed gas (1-5% COâ‚‚ in air) to control pH and prevent inhibition [37].
pH & Dissolved Oâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ Sensors	For real-time monitoring and control of critical culture parameters, ensuring optimal and reproducible growth conditions.	In-line probes connected to a data acquisition system are essential for precise process control.
Gas Analyzer	Measures the composition of inlet and outlet gas streams from the PBR to quantify Oâ‚‚ production and COâ‚‚ consumption rates.	Critical for calculating the mass balance and efficiency of the air revitalization process [36].
Harvesting & Concentration Equipment	For separating microbial biomass from the liquid culture medium after the growth phase.	Centrifuges or tangential flow filtration systems. The choice impacts energy use and cell viability.
Lipid & Protein Extraction Kits	Used for the analytical quantification of biochemical components in the harvested biomass.	Important for assessing the nutritional and potential biofuel value of the produced biomass [38].
dTpdU	dTpdU, CAS:10318-59-9, MF:C19H25N4O12P, MW:532.4 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Bulan	Bulan|C16H15Cl2NO2|RUO	Buy the research compound Bulan (C16H15Cl2NO2). This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic or therapeutic use.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are closed-loop systems critical for long-duration space missions, designed to sustain human life by regenerating essential resources like oxygen and water and recycling waste through biological processes [12]. The overarching principle of BLSS research is to achieve a high degree of system closure and self-sufficiency, thereby reducing dependency on resupply missions from Earth. Within these systems, biological components are categorized as producers, consumers, and waste degraders/recyclers [12]. While higher plants and microalgae have been the traditional focus for their regenerative capabilities, they present operational challenges such as biofilm formation, microbial contamination, and system instability [12].

The integration of aquatic bryophytes (mosses) represents a novel approach to diversifying and optimizing BLSS. These non-vascular plants offer a complementary biological component due to their physiological resilience, simple cultivation requirements, and multifunctional ecological roles [12]. Their capacity to act as efficient biofilters, removing contaminants from water and air while contributing to oxygen production, aligns with the core BLSS principle of multi-functional redundancy and system stability [12]. This technical guide details the application of aquatic bryophytes as biofilters, providing data, protocols, and frameworks for their implementation in BLSS research.

Performance Metrics and Quantitative Data

Evaluation of three aquatic bryophyte species—Taxiphyllum barbieri (Java moss), Leptodictyum riparium, and Vesicularia montagnei (Christmas moss)—under controlled conditions reveals distinct performance profiles suitable for BLSS integration [12]. Key quantitative data are summarized in the tables below.

Table 1: Photosynthetic Performance and Pigmentation of Aquatic Bryophytes

Bryophyte Species	Photosynthetic Efficiency (Fv/Fm)	Chlorophyll a Concentration (μg/g DW)	Chlorophyll b Concentration (μg/g DW)	Carotenoid Content (μg/g DW)
Taxiphyllum barbieri	High (≥ 0.76)	1452.3 ± 45.7	487.6 ± 22.1	215.8 ± 9.4
Leptodictyum riparium	Moderate (≈ 0.72)	1210.5 ± 38.2	405.3 ± 18.9	189.5 ± 8.1
Vesicularia montagnei	Lower (≈ 0.68)	987.4 ± 31.5	335.1 ± 15.7	165.2 ± 7.2

Table 2: Biofiltration Efficiency of Aquatic Bryophytes for Key Pollutants

Bryophyte Species	Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN) Removal (%)	Nitrate (NO₃⁻) Removal (%)	Zinc (Zn) Removal (%)	Lead (Pb) Removal (%)
Taxiphyllum barbieri	78.5%	65.2%	45.3%	38.7%
Leptodictyum riparium	95.1%	82.4%	88.9%	60.5%
Vesicularia montagnei	70.2%	58.7%	52.1%	75.8%

Table 3: Nitrogen Uptake Kinetics in Bryophytes (Summary from Field Studies)

Nitrogen Form	Km (Half-Saturation Constant, µM)	Vmax (Maximum Uptake Rate, µmol g⁻¹ DW h⁻¹)	Estimated Field Uptake Rate (µmol g⁻¹ DW h⁻¹)
Ammonium (NH₄⁺)	94	43.5	3.6
Nitrate (NO₃⁻)	21	6.6	1.8
Glycine (Organic N)	126	37.6	3.4

Experimental Protocols for BLSS Research

Protocol for Cultivation and Maintenance of Aquatic Bryophytes

• Species Selection: Procure axenic or semi-axenic cultures of target species (T. barbieri, L. riparium, V. montagnei) from reputable biological suppliers [12].
• Growth Environment Setup:
  • Aquaria/Tanks: Use glass or inert plastic aquaria.
  • Growth Medium: Utilize standard nutrient solutions for aquatic plants. For nitrogen uptake studies, the medium can be modified to be nitrogen-free as a baseline.
  • Temperature Control: Maintain at 22-24°C using submerged heaters and thermostats [12].
  • Lighting: Provide controlled illumination using full-spectrum LED lights. Two standard regimes are 600 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ (high light) and 200 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ (low light), with a 12:12 hour light:dark photoperiod [12].
  • Aeration/Water Flow: Ensure gentle, continuous water flow or aeration to prevent stagnation and ensure uniform nutrient distribution without causing physical damage to moss fronds.
• Maintenance: Monitor and maintain pH between 6.0 and 7.5. Conduct regular water changes (e.g., 25% volume weekly) to prevent accumulation of metabolic waste. Prune mosses as needed to maintain desired biomass and density.

Protocol for Assessing Biofiltration Efficiency

• Experimental Setup: Establish separate experimental vessels for each bryophyte species and a control vessel without bryophytes. A known wet weight of moss (e.g., 10g) should be introduced to each test vessel.
• Pollutant Spiking: Spike the water in each vessel with a known concentration of target pollutants:
  • Nitrogen Compounds: Use ammonium chloride (NHâ‚„Cl), sodium nitrate (NaNO₃), or the amino acid glycine to achieve concentrations of 50-100 μM [39] [40].
  • Heavy Metals: Use salts like zinc sulfate (ZnSOâ‚„) or lead nitrate (Pb(NO₃)â‚‚) to achieve concentrations of 1-5 mg L⁻¹ [12].
• Sampling and Analysis:
  • Water Sampling: Collect water samples from each vessel at time zero (immediately after spiking) and at regular intervals thereafter (e.g., 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hours).
  • Analysis: Analyze water samples for residual pollutant concentrations using standardized methods:
    • Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN): Salicylate method.
    • Nitrate: Cadmium reduction method.
    • Heavy Metals: Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) or Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS).
• Data Calculation: Calculate the removal efficiency (%) for each pollutant using the formula: [(C_initial - C_final) / C_initial] * 100, where Cinitial and Cfinal are the concentrations in the test vessel, corrected for any change in the control vessel.

Protocol for Physiological Status Monitoring

• Chlorophyll Fluorescence: Use a pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometer to measure the maximum quantum yield of Photosystem II (Fv/Fm) in dark-adapted moss samples. This is a key indicator of photosynthetic health and stress [12].
• Pigment Analysis: Extract chlorophylls and carotenoids from a known weight of freeze-dried moss tissue using an organic solvent (e.g., 90% acetone or DMSO). Quantify pigment concentrations spectrophotometrically using established formulas [12].
• Antioxidant Activity: Homogenize moss tissue in a cold buffer. Use assays such as the FRAP (Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma) or DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay to measure the total antioxidant capacity, indicating the plant's response to oxidative stress [12].

System Integration and Workflow Visualization

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Aquatic Bryophyte Studies

Item	Function/Application	Specific Examples / Notes
Axenic Bryophyte Cultures	Provides standardized, contaminant-free biological material for reproducible experiments.	Taxiphyllum barbieri, Leptodictyum riparium, Vesicularia montagnei [12].
Nutrient Stock Solutions	Formulates aquatic growth medium, allowing for controlled nutrient manipulation (e.g., N-depletion).	Macroelement (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) and microelement (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B, Mo) stocks.
Nitrogen Source Standards	Used in uptake kinetics and biofiltration studies to spike solutions with specific N forms.	Ammonium Chloride (NH₄Cl), Sodium Nitrate (NaNO₃), Glycine [39] [40].
Heavy Metal Salts	Used to prepare stock solutions for phytoremediation and toxicity assays.	Zinc Sulfate (ZnSO₄), Lead Nitrate (Pb(NO₃)₂), Cadmium Chloride (CdCl₂) [12].
Spectrophotometry Kits	Quantifies concentrations of nitrogenous compounds (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite) in water samples.	Commercially available kits based on salicylate (NH₃), cadmium reduction (NO₃⁻), etc.
PAM Fluorometer	Measures chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) as a non-invasive probe of photosynthetic health and stress.	A dark-adapting leaf clip is essential for accurate Fv/Fm measurement [12].
Antioxidant Assay Kits	Quantifies the total antioxidant capacity of bryophyte tissue extracts.	FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power) or DPPH assay kits [12].
ICP-OES/AAS	Provides precise and sensitive quantification of heavy metal concentrations in water and plant tissue.	Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry or Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.
Disul	Disulfiram	Disulfiram is an aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) inhibitor for alcohol use and oncology research. For Research Use Only. Not for human consumption.
Dimex	Dimex, CAS:18853-26-4, MF:C11H12NO4PS, MW:285.26 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Aquatic bryophytes, particularly species like Taxiphyllum barbieri and Leptodictyum riparium, present a highly promising and novel biological component for BLSS. Their demonstrated efficacy in biofiltration of nitrogen compounds and heavy metals, coupled with their robust photosynthetic performance and low cultivation requirements, fulfills key principles of BLSS design [12]. The integration of these bryophytes can enhance system stability, redundancy, and overall efficiency. Future research should focus on long-term performance under simulated space conditions, including microgravity and ionizing radiation, to validate their readiness for future Moon and Mars missions [12].

Insect Integration for Nutrient Recycling and Protein Production

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are fundamental for long-duration space missions, enabling sustainable food production, water recycling, and waste management through closed-loop ecological processes [41] [23]. These systems aim to replicate Earth's ecological functions within a technologically controlled environment, reducing reliance on resupply missions from Earth [23]. However, current BLSS research exhibits a significant knowledge gap, with most studies focusing predominantly on plant-based systems while largely neglecting the integration of animal components [41]. Analysis of 280 BLSS-focused studies reveals that only 13 have experimentally included insects, despite their multifunctional potential for nutrient recycling, protein production, and enhancing ecological resilience [41] [23]. This disparity highlights a critical research bias and underscores the untapped potential of insects as integral components of sustainable BLSS architectures.

Insects offer unique advantages for space-based life support systems, including high feed conversion efficiency, ability to utilize organic waste streams, and nutritional completeness as food sources [41] [42]. Species such as Acheta domesticus (house cricket), Tenebrio molitor (yellow mealworm), and Bombyx mori (silkworm) demonstrate particular promise but remain underexamined under space-relevant conditions [41]. This technical guide provides a comprehensive framework for integrating insects into BLSS, addressing both the nutrient recycling and protein production pathways essential for creating robust, self-sustaining life support systems for long-duration space missions and planetary colonization.

Candidate Insect Species for BLSS Integration

Selection Criteria and Comparative Analysis

The selection of appropriate insect species for BLSS integration requires careful consideration of multiple biological and technical parameters. Key selection criteria include nutritional value, waste conversion efficiency, reproductive rate, environmental tolerance, space requirements, and resilience to space-specific stressors such as microgravity and radiation [41] [42]. The table below provides a comparative analysis of promising insect species for BLSS implementation based on these criteria.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Candidate Insect Species for BLSS Integration

Species	Protein Content (% dry weight)	Feed Conversion Efficiency	Reproductive Cycle	Waste Processing Capability	Space Requirements	Key Advantages
Acheta domesticus (House cricket)	60-70% [43]	~2x more efficient than chickens [43]	6-8 weeks [42]	Medium [42]	Moderate [41]	Complete amino acid profile; high protein content [43]
Tenebrio molitor (Yellow mealworm)	50-60% [44]	High [41]	8-10 weeks [42]	High [41]	Low [41]	Efficient waste converter; high protein yield [41] [44]
Hermetia illucens (Black soldier fly)	40-45% [44]	Very high [44] [45]	4-6 weeks [45]	Very high [44] [45]	Low [44]	Superior organic waste conversion; high lipid content [44] [45]
Bombyx mori (Silkworm)	50-60% [41]	Medium [41]	6-7 weeks [41]	Low [41]	Moderate [41]	Established rearing protocols; byproduct (silk) production [41]

Nutritional Profiles for Human Consumption

The nutritional composition of insects makes them particularly valuable for BLSS, where efficient nutrient cycling is paramount. Beyond their high protein content, insects provide essential micronutrients often lacking in plant-based BLSS configurations.

Table 2: Micronutrient Composition of Selected Insect Species

Species	Iron (mg/100g)	Zinc (mg/100g)	Copper	Vitamin B12 (μg/100g)	Fatty Acid Profile
Acheta domesticus	>2x beef [43]	3x beef [43]	3x beef [43]	5.4-8.7 [44]	Favorable omega-3:omega-6 ratio [43]
Tenebrio molitor	High [43]	High [43]	High [43]	0.47 [44]	Similar to fish [43]
Hermetia illucens	Varies with diet [44]	Varies with diet [44]	Varies with diet [44]	Not specified	Rich in ALA [43]
Locusta migratoria	8-20 [44]	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified

Experimental Protocols for BLSS Insect Integration

Nutrient Recycling and Waste Conversion Assessment

Objective: Quantify the efficiency of insect-mediated conversion of BLSS organic waste streams into edible biomass and determine nutrient recovery rates.

Materials:

• Insect rearing containers with environmental controls
• Organic waste streams (plant inedible biomass, food waste, human waste derivatives)
• Analytical balances (±0.001 g precision)
• Drying oven and desiccator
• Nitrogen analyzer (for protein quantification)
• Gas chromatography system (for fatty acid analysis)
• ICP-MS (for mineral content determination)

Methodology:

• Waste Stream Preparation: Prepare standardized BLSS waste substrates including plant inedible biomass (wheat straw, lettuce roots), food preparation waste, and pre-processed human waste derivatives. Homogenize and characterize initial nutrient content [45].
• Experimental Setup: Establish triplicate groups of 100 late-instar larvae for each insect species (BSF, mealworm, cricket) and waste stream combination. Include control groups fed standard diets for comparison.
• Feeding Protocol: Provide ad libitum access to prepared waste substrates under controlled environmental conditions (temperature: 28±2°C, relative humidity: 70±5%, photoperiod: 12L:12D for crickets, continuous dark for BSF and mealworms) [44] [45].
• Data Collection:
  • Record initial and final biomass weights to determine feed conversion ratio (FCR) = feed consumed / biomass gained [44].
  • Collect frass (insect excreta) for nutrient analysis to quantify nutrient retention versus excretion.
  • Analyze resulting insect biomass for protein, lipid, and mineral content.
  • Measure residue composition post-consumption to determine waste mass reduction.

Data Analysis: Calculate nutrient conversion efficiency using the formula: [ \text{Conversion Efficiency (\%)} = \frac{\text{Nutrient in insect biomass}}{\text{Nutrient in input waste}} \times 100 ] Compare means using ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey tests (α=0.05) to identify significant differences between species and waste types.

Space-Relevant Stressor Tolerance Evaluation

Objective: Determine the effects of space-relevant stressors (microgravity, radiation, altered atmospheric composition) on insect development, reproduction, and waste conversion efficiency.

Materials:

• Clinostat or random positioning machine (for microgravity simulation)
• Radiation source (gamma or proton irradiation)
• Environmental chambers with gas composition control
• Reproductive performance monitoring equipment
• Metabolic rate measurement systems (respirometry)

Methodology:

• Stress Application:
  • Microgravity Simulation: Expose insect egg/larval stages to simulated microgravity using clinostat rotation (1-10 rpm) for varying durations (1-14 days) [41].
  • Radiation Exposure: Apply controlled gamma radiation doses (0.1-5 Gy) using Cs-137 source to assess tolerance thresholds [41].
  • Atmospheric Composition: Rear insects under BLSS-relevant atmospheric conditions (Oâ‚‚: 20-25%, COâ‚‚: 0.1-0.5%) compared to Earth normal [23].

• Performance Metrics:

  • Monitor development time from egg to adult
  • Measure survival rates at each life stage
  • Quantify reproduction parameters (fecundity, fertility, mating behavior)
  • Assess waste conversion efficiency under stress conditions
  • Analyze nutritional composition of resulting biomass

• Transcriptomic Analysis:

  • Conduct RNA sequencing of stress-exposed insects to identify genetic regulatory mechanisms
  • Identify biomarkers for stress tolerance to inform selective breeding programs

Data Interpretation: Compare stress-exposed groups to control groups maintained under optimal conditions. Establish species-specific tolerance thresholds and identify potential need for countermeasures or habitat modifications to ensure insect system robustness in space environments.

Figure 1: Insect-Mediated Nutrient Cycling in BLSS. This diagram illustrates the integration of insect bioconversion processes within a closed-loop life support system, demonstrating the pathway from BLSS waste streams to valuable products for crew nutrition and plant growth.

BLSS Implementation Framework

System Architecture and Integration

Successful insect integration into BLSS requires careful consideration of system architecture to optimize resource flows and functional relationships. The implementation framework addresses both small-scale modules for initial testing and full-scale habitat integration.

Table 3: BLSS Insect Module Implementation Parameters

System Parameter	Small-Scale Module	Pilot-Scale System	Full Habitat Integration
Volume Allocation	0.5-1 m³ [23]	2-5 m³ [23]	10-20 m³ [23]
Insect Species	Single species [41]	2-3 complementary species [41]	Multiple species with functional diversity [41]
Waste Processing Capacity	0.5-1 kg/day [45]	2-5 kg/day [45]	10-20 kg/day [45]
Protein Output	50-100 g/day [44]	200-500 g/day [44]	1-2 kg/day [44]
Automation Level	Manual monitoring [41]	Semi-automated [43]	Fully automated [43]
Crew Time Requirement	1-2 hours/day [41]	30 min/day [43]	<15 min/day [43]

Environmental Control and Optimization

Maintaining optimal environmental conditions is crucial for efficient insect performance in BLSS. The following parameters must be carefully controlled and monitored:

Temperature Management:

• Species-specific temperature ranges: 25-30°C for most species [44]
• Heating via waste metabolic heat recapture where possible
• Integration with BLSS thermal control systems

Humidity Control:

• Maintain 60-75% relative humidity for most species [44]
• Implement humidity buffering through substrate selection
• Balance with BLSS atmospheric water recovery systems

Atmospheric Composition:

• Monitor Oâ‚‚ consumption and COâ‚‚ production rates
• Integrate with plant growth module gas exchange
• Manage potential off-gassing (ammonia, VOCs) through filtration

Waste Substrate Preparation:

• Particle size reduction for improved consumption efficiency
• Moisture content adjustment (60-70% for most species) [45]
• Nutrient balancing through waste stream mixing
• Pasteurization where necessary for pathogen control

Integrated Pest Management for BLSS Insect Modules

The simplified ecosystems in BLSS create vulnerabilities to pest and pathogen outbreaks that could compromise system stability [46]. A comprehensive IPM strategy must be implemented proactively.

Prevention Protocols:

• Strict quarantine procedures for initial stock introduction
• Environmental manipulation to discourage pathogen growth
• Regular sanitation of rearing surfaces and equipment
• Air filtration to prevent cross-contamination between modules [46]

Monitoring Systems:

• Automated imaging for early detection of abnormal behavior or morphology
• Environmental sensor networks to maintain optimal conditions
• Regular microbial screening of substrates and insect populations
• Water activity monitoring in substrates to prevent fungal growth [46]

Intervention Strategies:

• Physical removal of affected individuals or groups
• Temperature manipulation outside pathogen tolerance ranges
• Biological controls (where feasible) with carefully selected entomopathogens
• Chemical interventions as last resort, selected for low human toxicity

Figure 2: Experimental Protocol for Assessing Space Stressor Effects on Insects. This workflow outlines the systematic approach to evaluating insect performance under space-relevant conditions to determine tolerance thresholds and inform system design.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Equipment for BLSS Insect Studies

Reagent/Equipment	Specification	Research Application	BLSS Relevance
Artificial Diets	Standardized nutritionally complete formulations [44]	Control diets for comparative studies	Baseline for waste conversion efficiency calculations
Waste Stream Substrates	Characterized plant, food, and human waste derivatives [45]	Testing insect conversion capabilities	Direct BLSS application for resource recovery
Environmental Chambers	Temperature (±0.5°C), humidity (±5%), gas control [41]	Maintaining optimal rearing conditions	Simulation of BLSS environmental parameters
Respirometry Systems	Oâ‚‚ consumption and COâ‚‚ production rates [41]	Metabolic studies	Integration with BLSS atmospheric management
RNA Sequencing Kits	Whole transcriptome analysis [41]	Stress response characterization	Identification of microgravity/radiation tolerance mechanisms
Nutritional Analysis Kits	Protein, lipid, carbohydrate quantification [44]	Product quality assessment	Verification of nutritional value for crew consumption
Microbial Detection Assays	Pathogen screening protocols [46]	System health monitoring	Prevention of outbreaks in closed systems
Automated Monitoring	Image analysis, weight tracking sensors [43]	Performance quantification	Reduction of crew time requirements
Norea	Norea, CAS:18530-56-8, MF:C13H22N2O, MW:222.33 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
dTpdA	dTpdA	dTpdA, a deoxydinucleoside monophosphate for nucleic acid research. For Research Use Only. Not for human, therapeutic, or diagnostic use.	Bench Chemicals

The integration of insects into Bioregenerative Life Support Systems represents a promising pathway for enhancing sustainability and resilience in long-duration space missions. Through their dual functionality in nutrient recycling and protein production, insects can significantly close the nutrient loops in BLSS, reducing reliance on external resupply and enhancing system autonomy [41] [23]. The experimental protocols and implementation frameworks outlined in this technical guide provide a foundation for advancing this critical research area.

Future research priorities should focus on quantifying insect performance under space-relevant conditions, optimizing multi-species integration strategies, and developing automated rearing systems compatible with BLSS architectural constraints [41]. Additionally, consumer acceptance strategies must be developed, including processing methods that enhance palatability and integration into familiar food formats [42] [43]. As we progress toward establishing human presence beyond Earth, insects offer a versatile, efficient, and sustainable biological resource for creating the robust closed-loop ecosystems essential for long-term space habitation.

In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Integration Strategies

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are closed-loop systems that rely on biological processes to sustain human life during long-duration space missions by regenerating essential resources and recycling waste [12] [19]. As missions extend farther from Earth and grow in duration, the impracticality and prohibitive cost of resupply from Earth make self-sufficiency critical [12] [47]. In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) represents a paradigm shift in mission architecture, enabling the use of local resources to reduce launch mass, risk, and cost [48]. The integration of ISRU with BLSS creates a synergistic relationship where biological systems process locally extracted materials into essential consumables, forming the foundation for sustainable human presence beyond Earth [49] [47].

The fundamental principle of BLSS involves interconnected compartments of producers (plants, algae), consumers (astronauts), and decomposers (microorganisms) that collectively recycle oxygen, water, and food while processing waste [19] [10]. ISRU enhances this closed-loop system by providing local resources such as regolith-derived substrates for plant growth, atmospheric carbon dioxide for photosynthesis, and potentially water from lunar or Martian sources [49] [47]. This integration is particularly crucial for future crewed missions to the Moon and Mars, where BLSS must operate with minimal Earth-supplied inputs [50].

Foundational Principles of BLSS and ISRU Synergy

The BLSS Framework

BLSS operates on ecological principles where waste products from one compartment serve as resources for another, creating a circular system [10]. These systems consist of three main compartment types: (1) Biological producers (plants, microalgae, photosynthetic bacteria) that generate oxygen and biomass through photosynthesis; (2) Consumers (crew members) who consume oxygen, water, and food while producing carbon dioxide and waste; and (3) Waste degraders and recyclers (microorganisms) that break down waste into reusable nutrients [12] [10]. The European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) program, operational since 1989, represents one of the most advanced efforts to model and develop such closed-loop BLSS [12].

ISRU Resource Streams for BLSS

ISRU provides BLSS with critical resource streams that would otherwise require transport from Earth:

• Regolith as plant growth substrate: Lunar and Martian surfaces contain minerals that can support plant growth when properly amended [49].
• Atmospheric COâ‚‚ for photosynthesis: The Martian atmosphere is approximately 95% carbon dioxide, providing an abundant carbon source for photosynthetic organisms [47].
• Water from icy regolith: Permanent shadow regions in lunar polar craters and Martian subsurface ice may provide water resources [48].
• Nutrient extraction from regolith: Essential plant nutrients can be liberated from native regolith through physical, chemical, or biological processing [47].

Table 1: Primary ISRU Resource Streams for BLSS Integration

Resource	Source	BLSS Application	Processing Requirements
Carbon Dioxide	Martian atmosphere (95% COâ‚‚)	Photosynthesis for oxygen production & food	Compression, concentration
Regolith	Lunar/Martian surface	Plant growth substrate	Sieving, amendment with organic matter
Water	Icy regolith (polar shadows)	Human consumption, plant irrigation, system processes	Extraction, purification
Nutrients	Regolith minerals	Plant fertilization	Biological/chemical extraction

Technical Implementation Frameworks

ISRU-Enhanced Plant Cultivation Systems

The integration of ISRU principles into plant cultivation begins with the development of regolith-based growth substrates. Research has demonstrated that both Martian (MMS-1) and Lunar (LHS-1) simulants can support plant growth when amended with organic matter [49]. In experiments with lettuce (Lactuca sativa), a 70:30 mixture of regolith simulant to monogastric manure (analogous to crew excreta and crop residues) provided optimal growth conditions, balancing nutrient availability and physical structure [49]. This mixture stimulated microbial biomass and enzymatic activities such as dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphomonoesterase, enhancing nutrient bioavailability for plants [49].

The selection of plant species for ISRU-enhanced BLSS follows mission-specific requirements. For short-duration missions, fast-growing species with high nutritional value and minimal volume requirements are preferred, including leafy greens (lettuce, kale), microgreens, and sprouts [10]. For long-duration planetary outposts, staple crops (wheat, potato, rice, soy) must be incorporated to provide carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, along with longer-cycle vegetables and fruits (tomato, peppers, beans) [10].

Biological ISRU Processing Systems

Cyanobacteria-based systems represent a promising approach for biological ISRU processing. These organisms can directly utilize Martian atmospheric COâ‚‚ to produce oxygen, biomass, and useful compounds through photosynthesis [47]. A proposed three-stage reactor system demonstrates the integration potential:

• Stage 1: Bioweathering of regolith by siderophilic cyanobacteria to liberate inorganic elements and create organic compounds.
• Stage 2: Photobioreactor with cyanobacteria species for oxygen production, COâ‚‚ fixation, and biomass accumulation for human consumption.
• Stage 3: Bioreactor for conversion of biomass into biofuels (e.g., methane) for propulsion and power systems [47].

Aquatic bryophytes (mosses) offer another biological ISRU component, functioning as efficient biofilters in BLSS. Species including Taxiphyllum barbieri, Leptodictyum riparium, and Vesicularia montagnei have demonstrated capabilities for removing nitrogen compounds and heavy metals from water while contributing to oxygen production [12]. Their high surface-to-volume ratio, physiological resilience, and simple cultivation requirements make them suitable for constrained space environments [12].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Protocol 1: Regolith Amendment for Plant Cultivation

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of regolith-organic matter mixtures as plant growth substrates.

Materials:

• Lunar (LHS-1) or Martian (MMS-1) regolith simulant
• Organic amendment (monogastric manure analog or composted plant residues)
• Plant seeds (e.g., Lactuca sativa cv. 'Grand Rapids')
• Controlled environment chamber
• Analysis equipment: microbial biomass C and N measurement, enzymatic activity assays

Methodology:

• Substrate Preparation: Create mixtures of regolith simulant and organic amendment in ratios of 100:0, 90:10, 70:30, and 50:50 (w/w).
• Plant Cultivation: Sow seeds in substrates and grow in controlled environment chamber (open gas exchange) for 30 days without fertilization.
• Data Collection:
  • Measure plant growth parameters (biomass, leaf area, root architecture)
  • Analyze plant physiology (chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate)
  • Determine nutrient uptake in plant tissue
  • Assess microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in substrates post-harvest
• Analysis: Correlate plant growth response with substrate physicochemical properties [49].

Protocol 2: Aquatic Bryophyte Biofiltration Efficiency

Objective: Characterize the biofiltration capacity and physiological responses of aquatic mosses for water purification in BLSS.

Materials:

• Semi-axenic cultures of Taxiphyllum barbieri, Leptodictyum riparium, and Vesicularia montagnei
• Controlled environment systems with temperature and light control
• Water analysis equipment for nitrogen compounds and heavy metals
• Gas exchange measurement system
• Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging system

Methodology:

• Acclimation: Maintain moss cultures under two different controlled conditions (24°C at 600 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ and 22°C at 200 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹).
• Biofiltration Assessment:
  • Expose mosses to water containing known concentrations of nitrogen compounds (ammonia, nitrates) and heavy metals (Zn, etc.)
  • Measure removal efficiency over time through water sampling and analysis
• Physiological Measurements:
  • Quantify photosynthetic efficiency via gas-exchange measurements
  • Assess photosystem functionality through chlorophyll fluorescence
  • Determine pigment concentration and antioxidant activity profiles
• Data Analysis: Identify species-specific strengths for complementary implementation in BLSS water purification [12].

Quantitative Data Analysis

Table 2: Performance Metrics of BLSS Biological Components

Biological Component	Primary Function	Key Performance Metrics	Optimal Conditions
Lettuce (Regolith)	Food production, Oâ‚‚ generation	Edible biomass: 30 days; Nutrient content	70:30 regolith:manure mixture
Aquatic Bryophytes	Water purification, O₂ production	NH₄ removal efficiency; Heavy metal uptake	24°C, 600 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹
Cyanobacteria	Oâ‚‚ production, biomass	COâ‚‚ fixation rate; Oâ‚‚ output	Photobioreactor with regolith leachate
Chicory	Prebiotic production	Inulin accumulation: 12g/day	6.3 m² area, 76-91 day cycle

Table 3: Human Metabolic Requirements for BLSS Design

Consumable	Daily Requirement per Astronaut	Production/Recycling Source
Oxygen	0.89 kg	Plant photosynthesis, algae cultivation
Food (dry mass)	0.80 kg	Higher plant cultivation, microbial biomass
Drinking Water	2.79 kg	Water recovery systems, transpiration
Water (food prep)	0.50 kg	ISRU water extraction, recycling

Integration Diagrams

Diagram 1: BLSS and ISRU Integration Framework. This diagram illustrates the resource flows between ISRU-sourced materials and BLSS processing compartments.

Diagram 2: Experimental Workflow for Regolith Amendment Studies. This protocol evaluates plant growth in ISRU-derived substrates.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 4: Key Research Materials for BLSS-ISRU Investigations

Reagent/Material	Function in Research	Application Example
Regolith Simulants (MMS-1, LHS-1)	Analogues of Lunar/Martian surface materials	Plant growth substrate studies [49]
Monogastric Manure	Analogue for crew waste (excreta, crop residues)	Organic amendment for regolith [49]
Aquatic Bryophytes (Taxiphyllum barbieri)	Biofiltration and resource regeneration	Water purification compartment [12]
Cyanobacteria (Limnospira indica)	Oxygen production, air revitalization	Photobioreactor for atmosphere management [50]
Controlled Environment Chambers	Precise regulation of growth conditions	Plant characterization units (e.g., PaCMan) [10]
C225	C225 (Cetuximab) Anti-EGFR Antibody	C225 (Cetuximab) is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody for cancer research. This product is for Research Use Only (RUO). Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use.
Oxyma	Oxyma|Ethyl Cyanohydroxyiminoacetate|Peptide Coupling Reagent	Oxyma (Ethyl Cyanohydroxyiminoacetate) is a superior, non-explosive peptide coupling additive that suppresses racemization. This product is For Research Use Only (RUO). Not for personal use.

The integration of ISRU strategies into BLSS represents a critical path toward sustainable human presence beyond Earth. By leveraging local resources through biological and physicochemical processes, these integrated systems significantly reduce dependence on Earth resupply while enabling longer-duration missions [47] [48]. Current research has established proof-of-concept for multiple integration pathways, including regolith-based plant cultivation, cyanobacterial processing of atmospheric COâ‚‚, and aquatic bryophyte biofiltration [12] [49] [47].

Future development requires addressing key challenges, including the impact of space environmental conditions (reduced gravity, increased radiation) on biological processes, scaling of integrated systems, and increasing operational autonomy [10]. The implementation path for extraterrestrial BLSS follows a three-stage strategy: initial use of hydroponics with limited ISRU, gradual incorporation of regolith processing and waste recycling, and eventual full integration of biological and ISRU systems for maximum self-sufficiency [19]. As these technologies mature, they will not only enable human exploration of the Moon and Mars but may also yield applications for sustainable resource management on Earth.

Technical Challenges and System Optimization Approaches

Mass Transfer Limitations in Partial Gravity Environments

Mass transfer—the movement of mass from one location to another—is a fundamental process governing the efficiency of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) for long-duration space missions. In partial gravity environments, such as on the Moon (0.17 g) or Mars (0.37 g), the alteration of gravitational force directly impacts convective flows, phase separation, and boundary layer dynamics, creating significant challenges for resource recycling systems [51]. BLSS architectures, such as the European Space Agency's MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative), are artificial ecosystems composed of interconnected compartments where different organisms (bacteria, plants, algae) sequentially recycle waste into oxygen, water, and food [52] [51]. The stoichiometric balance of elements (C, H, O, N) through these compartments relies on predictable mass transfer rates which can be disrupted by reduced gravity, potentially compromising system closure and crew safety [52].

Theoretical Impact of Partial Gravity on Mass Transfer Processes

Fundamental Physical Principles

Gravity profoundly influences mass transfer by driving buoyancy-induced convection, sedimentation, and phase separation. In partial gravity, these phenomena are neither absent nor equivalent to Earth-normal conditions, leading to non-linear effects on transport rates. The gravitational acceleration g is a direct multiplier in fundamental equations governing these processes. For example, in sedimentation, the terminal settling velocity of a particle is proportional to g, while in buoyancy-driven flow, the Grashof number (predicting natural convection behavior) is proportional to g [53]. Reducing gravity to Martian (0.38 g) or Lunar (0.17 g) levels thus directly attenuates the driving forces for these crucial transport mechanisms. This can result in thicker boundary layers around organisms (e.g., plant roots, algal cells) and at gas-liquid interfaces, potentially creating a diffusion-limited environment where metabolic waste products accumulate and essential nutrients are depleted locally [51].

Implications for BLSS Compartment Interactions

In a BLSS, the output of one compartment becomes the input for another. For instance, the MELiSSA loop includes compartments for waste decomposition (C1), photoheterotrophic processing (C2), nitrification (C3), and food production with algae (C4a) and higher plants (C4b) [52]. Mass transfer limitations in partial gravity can de-synchronize these compartments. A slowdown in oxygen diffusion from algae to the water phase, or in nutrient uptake by plant roots, could create bottlenecks. This would not only reduce the efficiency of individual compartments but could also propagate through the loop, preventing the achievement of a steady-state closure where 100% of food and oxygen are regenerated [52]. Furthermore, the partitioning of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) between gas and particle phases, known to be kinetically limited even on Earth, could be further perturbed, affecting air revitalization [54].

Table 1: Key Mass Transfer Parameters and Their Sensitivity to Gravity Level

Parameter/Process	Dependence on Gravity (g)	Potential Impact in Partial Gravity
Convective Flow Velocity	Proportional to g^0.5 (in natural convection)	Reduced mixing in fluids, thicker boundary layers
Particle Settling Velocity	Proportional to g	Slower sedimentation, altered suspension dynamics
Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Coefficient	Influenced by convection, thus g	Reduced aeration efficiency in bioreactors
Surface Tension-Driven Flow (Marangoni)	Independent of g	May become dominant mixing mechanism
Root Zone Nutrient Diffusion	Affected by water distribution	Water film stagnation, localized anoxia

Experimental Methodologies for Investigating Mass Transfer Limitations

Ground-Based Analogue Facilities and Protocols

Given the extreme cost and limited access to spaceflight, ground-based analogues are essential for initial investigations. These facilities simulate reduced gravity effects and allow for controlled, high-resolution measurements.

• Random Positioning Machines (RPMs) and Clinostats: These devices continuously reorient biological samples to nullify the time-averaged gravity vector, simulating microgravity conditions [51]. To study partial gravity, the operational algorithms of these machines can be modified to provide a residual g vector of a specified magnitude (e.g., 0.3 g or 0.1 g).

  • Sample Protocol for Algal Bioreactor Studies: A photobioreactor containing the cyanobacterium Limnospira indica (a candidate for MELiSSA's C4a compartment) is mounted on an RPM. The machine is programmed to simulate 0.3 g. The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in the culture medium is measured in real-time with a non-invasive optical sensor. The mass transfer coefficient (KLa) for oxygen is determined by measuring the rate of oxygen depletion after a nitrogen purge and subsequent re-aeration. This value is compared against 1 g controls to quantify the mass transfer limitation [52].

• Low-Speed Centrifuges: To simulate partial gravity environments like Mars, small-scale bioreactors or plant growth chambers can be placed on custom-designed centrifuges housed within standard laboratory incubators [51]. This provides a constant, tunable g-level.

  • Sample Protocol for Plant Root Zone Mass Transfer: Arabidopsis thaliana plants are grown in a porous substrate within specialized chambers on a 0.3 g centrifuge. A nutrient tracer (e.g., a fluorescently tagged nitrate analog) is introduced to the irrigation solution. Confocal microscopy and laser scanning are used to track the spatial and temporal distribution of the tracer in the root zone, quantifying the effective diffusivity and advective transport of nutrients in the rhizosphere [51].

In-Situ Spaceflight Experimentation

Validation in true partial gravity requires experimentation aboard orbiting platforms like the International Space Station (ISS), which can provide long-duration exposure.

• Utilizing the European Modular Cultivation System (EMCS): The EMCS is one of the few ISS facilities equipped with centrifuges capable of generating a range of partial gravity levels, up to 1 g as an in-flight control [55]. This is critical for distinguishing the effects of microgravity from other spaceflight stressors like cosmic radiation.
  • Sample Protocol for Gas-Exchange Measurements: Bryophyte species (e.g., Taxiphyllum barbieri, identified as promising biofilters) are grown in small, sealed chambers on the EMCS rotor set to 0.17 g, 0.38 g, and 1 g [16]. The chambers are equipped with in-situ gas analyzers. The protocol involves a light-dark transient method: the photosynthetic rate (O2 production, CO2 consumption) in the light and respiratory rate in the dark are measured. From these transients, the apparent carboxylation efficiency and mesophyll conductance can be derived, which are proxies for internal CO2 diffusion limitations [16].

The following diagram illustrates a generalized workflow for designing and executing a mass transfer study, from ground-based simulation to data analysis.

Figure 1: Workflow for mass transfer limitation studies.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Reagents and Materials for BLSS Mass Transfer Research

Reagent/Material	Function in Experimentation	Specific Application Example
Fluorescent Tracers (e.g., FITC-Dextran)	Visualizing and quantifying fluid flow and solute transport.	Mapping nutrient solution flow patterns in plant growth substrates under partial gravity.
Optical Dissolved Oxygen Sensors	Non-invasive, real-time monitoring of O2 concentration in bioreactors.	Measuring the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (KLa) for O2 in algal photobioreactors.
Stable Isotopes (e.g., 15N-Nitrate, 13C-CO2)	Tracing the pathway and utilization efficiency of elements.	Quantifying nitrogen uptake kinetics by plants and its assimilation into biomass.
Genetically Encoded Biosensors	Reporting real-time metabolic states (e.g., pH, Ca2+, redox) within living cells.	Probing intracellular responses of cyanobacteria to external nutrient gradients caused by mass transfer limits.
Model Organisms (e.g., Arabidopsis, Limnospira)	Well-characterized biological systems for controlled studies.	Serving as standardized testbeds for comparing mass transfer effects across different g-levels.
Nittp	NITTP Epoxy Resin|High-Performance Adhesive for Research
Dmdbp	Dmdbp|C25H26O5|Research Compound	Dmdbp high-purity compound for research use only (RUO). Explore its applications and value in scientific studies. Not for human or veterinary use.

Mass transfer limitations present a critical, yet under-investigated, challenge for the operation of robust and efficient Bioregenerative Life Support Systems in partial gravity. The attenuation of convective transport can lead to diffusion-dominated regimes that reduce the efficiency of gas exchange, nutrient delivery, and waste removal, potentially threatening the stoichiometric closure of the system [52]. Addressing this requires a multi-faceted research approach combining sophisticated ground-based simulation, targeted in-situ spaceflight experiments with proper 1-g in-flight controls [55], and the development of high-fidelity predictive models. Future work must focus on quantifying key parameters like mass transfer coefficients for various BLSS compartments under partial gravity and engineering novel solutions—such as optimized reactor geometries, active mixing strategies, or the selection of biological species with naturally low susceptibility to diffusion limits (e.g., aquatic bryophytes [16])—to ensure that BLSS can reliably sustain human life on the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

Microbial Contamination and System Stability Management

Microbial contamination presents a moderate to severe threat to the long-term stability and functionality of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) essential for extended human space exploration. Effective management requires an integrated framework combining proactive monitoring, targeted containment, and dynamic intervention protocols. This whitepaper synthesizes current research and experimental data to provide a technical guide for contamination control, outlining specific microbial threats, quantitative impacts, detection methodologies, and integrated pest management strategies tailored to space-based BLSS. The principles discussed are framed within the broader context of maintaining functional stability in closed ecological systems.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are artificial ecosystems designed to sustain human life in space by regenerating oxygen, water, and food through biological processes. These systems integrate producers (plants, microalgae), consumers (crew), and decomposers (microorganisms) to create a closed-loop material cycle [19]. However, the enclosed, resource-limited nature of BLSS creates ideal conditions for microbial proliferation, which can destabilize the delicate ecological balance.

Historical data from space missions and ground-based analogs demonstrate that microbial contamination cannot be entirely prevented, even with strict quarantine. Spacecraft monitoring has consistently revealed a high diversity of bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes introduced via clothing, equipment, air currents, food, and crew members [56]. These microorganisms can directly threaten plant health through pathogenesis, degrade system components, and potentially impact crew health. The 2015 Veggie mission on the International Space Station (ISS) exemplifies this threat, where an outbreak of Fusarium oxysporum on Zinnia plants resulted in only one of six plants reaching maturity, compromising system productivity [46]. Managing this microbial burden is therefore critical for ensuring the functional stability and long-term viability of BLSS for lunar, Martian, and other deep-space missions.

Microbial Contamination Profiles and Quantitative Risks

Understanding the specific profile of microbial contaminants is essential for developing targeted management protocols. Research from terrestrial hydroponic systems and space missions provides quantitative data on the most prevalent and high-risk species.

Table 1: Prevalent Microbial Genera Recovered from Spacecraft and Associated Risks

Microorganism Type	Most Prevalent Genera	Reported Plant Pathogenic Species	Primary Source
Fungi	Alternaria, Aspergillus, Botrytis, Candida, Cephalosporium, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Mucor, Penicillium, Phoma, Trichoderma	>80% of hydroponic outbreaks caused by Fusarium, Phytophthora, and Pythium [56]	Airborne, crew, equipment
Bacteria	Bacillus, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Micrococcus, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus	Multiple species within Pseudomonas and Bacillus [56]	Crew, water systems

Analysis of terrestrial hydroponic systems, which serve as effective analogues for space-based plant growth modules, indicates that aggressive root or foliar pathogens can cause severe epidemics, with over 80% of documented outbreaks attributed to three fungal genera: Fusarium, Phytophthora, and Pythium [56]. Of these, Fusarium species pose the most significant threat to space-based BLSS. While Phytophthora and Pythium are soilborne and potentially excluded by strict sanitation, Fusarium species are typically airborne, can grow saprophytically on diverse substrates, and have been frequently identified as common contaminants in American and Russian spacecraft [56] [46]. This resilience and multiple transmission vectors make them a primary concern for system stability.

Detection and Monitoring Methodologies

Rapid and accurate detection of microbial contamination is the cornerstone of an effective management strategy. Monitoring programs must integrate both general and specific methods to provide comprehensive system awareness.

Optical Monitoring Techniques

Optical methods offer a rapid, non-destructive means for initial contamination screening. These techniques exploit the interaction between light and microbial cells or the particles they colonize.

• Turbidimetry and Nephelometry: These methods measure the cloudiness of water caused by suspended particles, including microbial cells. While used as a general indicator of water quality in drinking water plants, their relevance can be limited by interference from non-biological colloids [57].
• Advanced Light Scattering and Absorption: More sophisticated optical methods analyze how light is scattered or absorbed by microbial cells. This can detect bacteria or viruses either as free particles or when adsorbed to organo-mineral complexes that alter the optical properties of water or surfaces [57]. These techniques are particularly valuable for monitoring water resources in a BLSS, where microbial loads can fluctuate rapidly.
• Microplate Readers: These instruments provide a versatile platform for high-throughput microbial detection and analysis in liquid samples. They can measure bacterial growth kinetics, protein expression, and contamination in cell cultures through various optical assays, providing both quantitative and functional data [58].

Molecular and Culture-Based Protocols

For definitive identification and quantification of specific pathogens, molecular and traditional microbiological techniques are required.

• Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): PCR allows for the targeted detection of specific microbial genera or species by amplifying their unique DNA sequences. While highly specific, its targeted nature means it may not detect unexpected or novel contaminants and has not found widespread use in general monitoring programs [57].
• Conventional Bacterial Culture: This standardized method involves culturing samples on selective and differential media to isolate and identify viable microorganisms, such as fecal indicator bacteria like E. coli or Enterococci. It remains a gold standard for assessing general microbiological quality but is slower than optical or molecular methods [57].

Table 2: Comparison of Microbial Detection and Monitoring Methods

Method	Principle	Sensitivity	Speed	Primary Application in BLSS
Turbidimetry	Light scattering by suspended particles	Low	Minutes	Real-time, general water quality alert
Microplate Reader	Bacterial growth, absorbance/fluorescence	Medium-High	Hours	Quantifying growth rates, contamination assays
Culture-Based	Growth on selective media	High	1-3 days	Definitive identification of viable organisms
PCR	Amplification of target DNA sequences	Very High	Hours	Specific pathogen identification

The following workflow diagram outlines the decision process for implementing these monitoring strategies within a BLSS:

Integrated Pest Management for BLSS Stability

An Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program is a multi-layered strategy essential for preventing, mitigating, and eliminating microbial outbreaks in BLSS. A successful IPM program is dynamic, evolving with the system's successional processes, and must be established during the mission design phase to be fully effective [46].

Core IPM Protocols

• Prevention and Quarantine: The first line of defense involves strict sanitation and quarantine procedures for all material entering the BLSS. This includes surface sterilization of seeds, disinfection of tools and growth chambers, and filtration of air and water inputs. Historical analysis shows that while strict quarantine alone is not 100% effective in preventing contamination, it significantly mitigates the threat of introduction for specific pathogens like Phytophthora and Pythium [56].
• Environmental Control: Manipulating the growth environment is a powerful non-chemical tool. Many plant pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum, thrive under high humidity. Maintaining optimal relative humidity and avoiding free water on plant surfaces can suppress disease development. The zinnia outbreak on ISS was exacerbated by a high-humidity event that created water-soaked leaves and stems [46]. Controlling temperature and light spectra can also enhance plant vigor and resistance.
• Biological Control: Employing beneficial microorganisms (probiotics) as antagonists against pathogens is a promising bioregenerative approach. For example, specific strains of Bacillus or Pseudomonas can outcompete pathogens for resources or produce antimicrobial compounds. The use of plant probiotics is being investigated as a technology to promote plant growth and health in BLSS [19].
• Physical and Chemical Interventions: While chemical fungicides and bactericides are a last resort due to potential toxicity to crew and beneficial organisms, physical methods such as UV-C irradiation of water and surfaces can be effective for disinfection without leaving chemical residues.

The interrelationship of these protocols within a comprehensive IPM framework is shown below:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Implementing the detection and management protocols described requires a specific set of reagents and tools. The following table details key research solutions for BLSS microbial research.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Contamination Studies

Reagent/Material	Function	Example Application in BLSS Context
Selective Culture Media	Supports growth of specific microbial taxa while inhibiting others.	Isolating Fusarium from plant tissue or system water using Komada's medium [57].
DNA Extraction Kits	Purifies microbial DNA from complex samples (water, biofilm, plant tissue).	Preparing template DNA for PCR-based identification of pathogens.
PCR Primers & Probes	Binds to and amplifies unique DNA sequences of target pathogens.	Specific detection of F. oxysporum or Pseudomonas spp. in monitoring assays.
Microplate Assay Kits	Measures metabolic activity, viability, or specific enzymes.	Quantifying total microbial load in water samples using fluorescence-based assays [58].
UV-C Irradiation Source	Physically inactivates microorganisms by damaging nucleic acids.	Decontaminating water loops and hard surfaces within plant growth modules.
BLP-3	BLP-3 Bombinin Like Peptide 3

The management of microbial contamination is not merely a supplementary procedure but a fundamental requirement for the functional stability of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems. The integration of rigorous monitoring, leveraging both optical and molecular methods, with a dynamic and layered Integrated Pest Management program provides a viable path toward sustainable, long-duration space missions. Future research must focus on understanding plant-microbe interactions in microgravity, refining the efficacy of biological controls, and automating detection and response systems to create a resilient BLSS capable of supporting humanity's future beyond Earth.

Radiation Effects on Biological Systems and Mitigation Strategies

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are fundamental for long-duration human space exploration, as they aim to create a sustainable closed-loop environment for resource regeneration, food production, and waste recycling [10]. Within these systems, various biological components—including plants, microorganisms, and humans—are integrated to sustain crew life by producing oxygen, purifying water, and generating fresh food [59]. However, the space environment presents a significant challenge to BLSS functionality due to the constant presence of ionizing radiation, primarily composed of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) and Solar Particle Events (SPE) [59]. GCR consists of high-energy protons (85%), helium ions (14%), and heavier ions (1%), while SPE are sporadic, intense bursts of predominantly lower-energy protons [59]. This radiation can cause severe biological damage by breaking chemical bonds and ionizing molecules, leading to DNA damage, cellular dysfunction, and increased mutation rates [60]. Understanding these radiation effects and developing effective mitigation strategies is therefore crucial for ensuring BLSS reliability and crew safety during exploration-class missions to the Moon and Mars.

Space Radiation Environment and Biological Impact Mechanisms

Radiation Physics and Environmental Characteristics

Space radiation differs significantly from terrestrial radiation sources in both composition and energy spectrum. GCR are isotropic, energetic particles with fluxes peaking at 1-2 GeV/nucleon, while SPE are unpredictable, directional events with higher particle rates and lower energy spectra [59]. When these primary radiation particles interact with spacecraft shielding and biological tissues, they produce secondary radiation through nuclear fragmentation, increasing the complexity of the radiation field and potentially worsening biological impacts [59]. The radiation environment inside a habitat varies significantly based on mission parameters, including the presence of planetary magnetic fields (in Low Earth Orbit), atmospheric shielding (on Mars), and the distribution of mass within the spacecraft or base [59].

Fundamental Mechanisms of Biological Damage

Ionizing radiation causes biological damage through both direct and indirect mechanisms. Direct damage occurs when radiation energy is deposited directly in biomolecules such as DNA, proteins, and lipids, leading to ionization and bond breakage [60]. Indirect damage is mediated by radiolysis of water, the most abundant molecule in living organisms, which generates highly reactive free radicals like the hydroxyl radical (•OH) that subsequently damage surrounding biomolecules [60]. The extent of damage depends on radiation quality factors including linear energy transfer (LET), with high-LET radiation (e.g., heavy ions) causing more complex, difficult-to-repair damage compared to low-LET radiation (e.g., X-rays or gamma rays) [59].

Table: Radiation Types and Their Biological Penetration Characteristics

Radiation Type	Composition	Penetration Ability	Shielding Requirements	Relative Biological Effectiveness
Alpha particles	Helium nuclei	Very low (stopped by skin or paper)	Minimal	High if internalized
Beta particles	Electrons/positrons	Moderate (stopped by thin metal)	Light shielding	Moderate
Gamma rays/X-rays	Photons	High (requires dense materials)	Lead, concrete	Low to moderate
Protons	Hydrogen nuclei	Variable with energy	Moderate shielding	Moderate
Heavy ions	Atomic nuclei > helium	Very high (penetrating)	Complex, multi-layer	Very high
Neutrons	Neutral particles	High	Hydrogen-rich materials	High

Radiation Effects on Specific Biological Components of BLSS

Plant Responses to Ionizing Radiation

Plants serve as essential components of BLSS, functioning as primary producers that generate oxygen, purify water through transpiration, and produce fresh food [10]. Their response to ionizing radiation is complex and influenced by multiple factors including species, developmental stage, radiation quality, dose, and exposure duration [61]. The photosynthetic apparatus is particularly radiosensitive, with studies demonstrating radiation-induced damage to photosystem II and alterations in photosynthetic pigment composition [61]. Morphological changes observed in irradiated plants include reduced growth, leaf abnormalities, chromosomal aberrations, and decreased reproductive capacity [61]. These effects potentially compromise BLSS functionality by reducing resource regeneration efficiency and food production yields.

Plant species exhibit varying radioresistance thresholds, with some developing protective mechanisms including enhanced DNA repair, antioxidant production, and changes in secondary metabolism [59]. Research has identified specific anatomical alterations in plants exposed to chronic low-intensity γ-radiation, including decreased relative volume of choroid plexuses, reduced epithelial cell height, cytoplasmic vacuolization, and dystrophic changes in brain tissue in animal models [62]. Such structural modifications could significantly impair plant physiological functions essential for BLSS performance.

Table: Plant Responses to Different Radiation Types and Doses

Plant Species	Radiation Type	Dose Range	Observed Effects	BLSS Implications
Rice	Heavy ions	10-100 Gy	Chlorophyll deletions, morphological mutations	Genetic instability, reduced food yield
Soybean	Gamma radiation	5-50 cGy	Morphological changes in choroid plexus	Potential disruption of resource regeneration
Wheat	Space flight conditions	Varies	Altered growth patterns	Impacts staple crop production
Lettuce	Chronic γ-irradiation	5-50 cGy	Tissue structural changes	Affects leafy green production
Dwarf tomato	Simulated space radiation	Varies	Growth reduction	Compromises fresh food variety
Microgreens	Various	Varies	Rapid nutrient production	High seed mass requirement for short missions

Microbial and Fungal Compartment Responses

Microorganisms in BLSS serve crucial roles as degraders and recyclers of organic waste, contributing to nutrient cycling and system stability [10]. Radiation exposure can alter microbial community structure and function, potentially disrupting essential processes including waste processing, water purification, and atmosphere revitalization. While specific radiation effects on BLSS-relevant microorganisms require further investigation, studies indicate that radiation tolerance varies significantly among microbial taxa, with some extremophiles exhibiting remarkable resistance through efficient DNA repair mechanisms and antioxidant systems.

Human Health Implications

Crew members face significant health risks from space radiation exposure, including increased cancer incidence, central nervous system damage, degenerative tissue effects, and acute radiation syndrome during extreme events like SPE [59]. Chronic low-dose exposure can lead to persistent oxidative stress, immune system dysfunction, and accelerated aging [62]. These health impacts directly affect crew ability to maintain BLSS operations and mission success. Furthermore, radiation exposure can exacerbate other spaceflight-related health issues including bone density loss and muscle atrophy, creating complex medical challenges for long-duration missions.

Mitigation Strategies for Radiation Protection in BLSS

Shielding Technologies and Materials

Radiation shielding represents the primary physical countermeasure against space radiation. Passive shielding involves placing materials between radiation sources and biological components to attenuate particle energy. Current research indicates that hydrogen-rich materials like polyethylene provide superior protection per unit mass compared to traditional metals because they produce fewer secondary particles when struck by primary radiation [59]. Innovative approaches include multi-purpose materials that provide both structural support and radiation protection, potentially incorporating regolith or water as shielding components in planetary habitats. The development of new composite materials with enhanced shielding properties remains an active research area for BLSS applications.

Biological and Operational Countermeasures

Biological countermeasures focus on enhancing innate repair mechanisms and radiation resistance of BLSS components. For plant compartments, selective breeding or genetic engineering of radioresistant cultivars offers promise for maintaining productivity in radiation-rich environments [61] [59]. For human crew members, pharmacological and nutritional interventions including antioxidants, radioprotectants, and biological response modifiers may help mitigate radiation damage [59]. Operational countermeasures include strategic scheduling of activities to avoid SPE exposure, rotational use of shielded areas, and implementation of real-time radiation monitoring systems to inform operational decisions.

The three fundamental principles of radiation protection—justification, optimization, and dose limitation—provide a framework for managing radiation risks in BLSS contexts [63]. Justification requires that any activity involving radiation exposure provides sufficient benefit to warrant the risk. Optimization follows the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable), minimizing exposures through careful system design and operational planning. Dose limitation establishes maximum exposure thresholds to prevent deterministic effects and limit stochastic risk [63].

System Design and Mission Architecture Considerations

BLSS design must incorporate radiation protection as an integral element rather than an afterthought. This includes strategic layout of components to maximize shielding effectiveness, redundant systems for critical biological functions, and compartmentalization to prevent system-wide failures. Mission architecture decisions significantly influence radiation exposure, with planetary surfaces offering natural shielding (approximately 50% reduction in GCR exposure) compared to orbital habitats [59]. Mission duration directly determines cumulative exposure, making radiation a particularly critical factor for long-duration missions beyond Earth's magnetosphere.

Experimental Methodologies and Research Tools

Ground-Based Radiation Exposure Protocols

Ground-based experiments utilizing particle accelerators simulate space radiation effects on BLSS components. These facilities aim to replicate the charge and energy spectrum of GCR, though achieving full space fidelity remains challenging [59]. Standardized experimental protocols are essential for generating comparable data across research institutions. For plant studies, typical methodologies include:

• Seed/Seedling Irradiation: Exposure of seeds or young seedlings to controlled radiation doses, followed by monitoring of germination rates, growth parameters, and morphological developments [61].
• Chronic Exposure Systems: Long-term, low-dose rate irradiation simulating continuous GCR exposure, often using gamma sources like 137Cs [62].
• Acute Exposure Protocols: Short-term, high-dose rate exposures simulating SPE conditions, typically using proton beams [59].
• Multi-Stress Experiments: Combined radiation exposure with other space factors including altered gravity, hypomagnetic conditions, and psychological stress [62].

Post-irradiation analyses include assessment of genomic instability, chromosomal aberrations, photosynthetic efficiency, antioxidant capacity, and metabolic profiling to comprehensively evaluate radiation impacts.

Advanced Imaging and Detection Techniques

Advanced imaging technologies enable precise quantification of radiation effects and distribution. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) techniques including Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) provide non-invasive methods for monitoring tissue changes, cellular density, and vascular function in biological systems [64]. Cerenkov Radiation Energy Transfer (CRET) imaging offers novel approaches for detecting radionuclide distribution in biological samples, potentially applicable to tracking nutrient uptake in plant systems [65].

Table: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Radiation Biology Studies

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Specific Use Cases in Radiation Studies
Qtracker705 nanoparticles	CRET imaging agent	Spectral coupling for optical detection of PET isotopes [65]
ELISA kits	Cytokine quantification	Measuring inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6, MCP-1) in irradiated biological samples [62]
DAPI staining solutions	Nuclear DNA visualization	Chromosomal aberration detection in irradiated cells
Antioxidant assay kits	Oxidative stress measurement	Quantifying reactive oxygen species in plant and microbial systems
PARP inhibitors	DNA repair pathway modulation	Studying DNA damage response mechanisms
Hydrogen peroxide detectors	Oxidative burden assessment	Monitoring radiation-induced reactive oxygen species in BLSS components
Radioisotope tracers (64Cu, 18F)	Metabolic pathway tracking	Studying nutrient uptake in plants under radiation stress

The Scientist's Toolkit for BLSS Radiation Research

Research Gaps and Future Directions

Despite significant progress in understanding radiation effects on biological systems, critical knowledge gaps remain particularly relevant to BLSS implementation. Current research has primarily utilized photon-type radiation rather than space-relevant charged particles, limiting predictive accuracy for actual space missions [59]. Future studies should prioritize experiments with high-fidelity radiation simulations incorporating the full spectrum of GCR components. Additionally, research on synergistic effects of radiation combined with other space factors (e.g., microgravity, hypomagnetic conditions) on BLSS components is essential but currently limited [62].

The development of standardized protocols for radiation biology experiments represents another critical need, enabling direct comparison of results across research institutions and accelerating knowledge integration [59]. Medium-term research priorities should include comprehensive dose-response characterization for candidate BLSS species, identification of radioresistance mechanisms across biological kingdoms, and validation of shielding strategies in integrated ground demonstrations.

Long-term objectives include the development of biologically enhanced countermeasures through selective breeding or genetic engineering of BLSS components, creation of intelligent monitoring systems that can predict radiation damage before functional impacts occur, and design of fully integrated BLSS architectures that inherently minimize radiation risks through redundant biological systems and adaptive operational protocols.

Model Predictive Control (MPC) represents a category of advanced control strategies that use explicit process models to predict system behavior over a future time horizon, enabling optimized control actions for complex, multivariable systems [66]. This capability makes MPC particularly valuable for managing the dynamic, interconnected processes within Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS), which are artificial ecosystems designed to sustainably provide astronauts with oxygen, water, and food while recycling waste during long-duration space missions [52] [67]. The fundamental principle of MPC involves repeatedly solving an optimization problem at each control interval: it predicts future system behavior over a finite prediction horizon, computes an optimal sequence of control actions that minimizes a performance objective while satisfying constraints, then implements only the first control action before repeating the process with updated measurements in a receding horizon approach [68]. This methodology provides inherent robustness against uncertainties and disturbances, which is paramount in biological systems where variability is significant and patient safety is critical [68].

For BLSS applications, MPC offers distinct advantages over conventional control methods. These systems comprise multiple interconnected compartments—typically including biological 'producers' (plants, microalgae), 'consumers' (crew), and waste 'degraders and recyclers' (bacteria)—that exchange materials in complex, tightly coupled cycles [67]. MPC's ability to handle multiple inputs and outputs simultaneously while respecting operational constraints makes it uniquely suited for maintaining the delicate balance of these artificial ecosystems [66]. Furthermore, as space missions reach farther from Earth, the feasibility of resupply diminishes, making system reliability and closure efficiency increasingly critical [67]. The integration of MPC with BLSS represents a promising approach to achieving the high degree of material closure (98% or greater) necessary for autonomous long-duration missions beyond Earth orbit [20].

Technical Foundations of Model Predictive Control

Historical Evolution and Key Algorithms

MPC technology has evolved significantly since its inception, with major algorithmic developments driven initially by industrial process control needs before expanding into biomedical and biological applications. The historical development of key MPC algorithms is summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Evolution of Major MPC Algorithms

Algorithm	Time Period	Key Characteristics	Industrial/Application Context
Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG)	1960s	Stochastic optimal control for linear systems with Gaussian noise; combines LQR with Kalman filtering [66].	Aerospace and process industries [66].
Identification and Command (IDCOM)	Late 1970s	Uses impulse response models; quadratic performance objective with reference trajectories and constraints [66].	Industrial process control [66].
Dynamic Matrix Control (DMC)	1970s-1980s	Employs linear step response models with least-squares optimization for set point tracking [66].	Petrochemical and process industries [66].
Quadratic Dynamic Matrix Control (QDMC)	1980s	Extends DMC with improved constraint handling capabilities through quadratic programming [66].	Processes requiring rigorous constraint management [66].
Nonlinear MPC (NMPC)	1990s-Present	Handles nonlinear system dynamics; computationally intensive but more accurate for biological systems [66].	Biomedical, biological, and advanced process applications [66].

The progression of MPC algorithms demonstrates a consistent trend toward handling increasingly complex system dynamics with improved constraint management. Early algorithms like LQG laid the theoretical foundation for optimal control but lacked explicit constraint handling capabilities [66]. The development of IDCOM and DMC represented significant practical advances by incorporating input and output constraints directly into the control problem formulation, making MPC applicable to real-world industrial processes [66]. Contemporary MPC implementations continue to evolve, with recent advances focusing on nonlinear systems, robust formulations for uncertain systems, and computationally efficient implementations for embedded applications [68].

Core Methodological Framework

The MPC methodology follows a systematic sequence at each control interval, with the mathematical foundation centered on solving a constrained optimization problem. The general MPC formulation minimizes an objective function J over a prediction horizon N, typically expressed as:

[ J = \sum{k=1}^{N} (y(k) - r(k))^T Q (y(k) - r(k)) + \sum{k=0}^{N_u-1} \Delta u(k)^T R \Delta u(k) ]

where y(k) represents the predicted outputs, r(k) the reference trajectories, Δu(k) the control moves, Q and R are weighting matrices that prioritize output tracking versus control effort, and N_u is the control horizon [66]. This optimization is performed subject to system dynamics model constraints and operational constraints on inputs, outputs, and states [68].

The essential characteristics that make MPC particularly suitable for BLSS applications include:

• Multivariable capability: MPC can simultaneously handle multiple manipulated and controlled variables, which is essential for managing the interconnected biological processes in BLSS where individual compartments exchange multiple material flows [66].
• Constraint handling: MPC explicitly incorporates system constraints (e.g., maximum permissible oxygen concentrations, safe pH ranges, temperature limits) directly into the control problem, ensuring operations remain within safe biological boundaries [66] [68].
• Feedforward action: MPC can naturally incorporate measurable disturbances (e.g., changes in crew metabolic activity, variations in waste production) and proactively compensate for their effects before they impact system outputs [66].
• Predictive capability: By forecasting future system behavior, MPC can anticipate and proactively respond to slow biological processes with significant time delays, such as plant growth dynamics or microbial waste processing [66].

Table 2: Key Advantages and Limitations of MPC for BLSS Applications

Advantages	Limitations	Relevance to BLSS
Handles multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) systems naturally [66]	Requires accurate process models [68]	BLSS involves multiple interconnected material flows [52]
Explicitly manages system constraints [66] [68]	Computational demands can be significant [68]	Biological systems have narrow operating windows [67]
Compensates for system delays and time constants [66]	Performance depends on model accuracy [68]	BLSS compartments exhibit different response times [52]
Provides optimal control actions with preview capability [66]	Implementation complexity [68]	Enables proactive management of biological processes [67]

MPC Application to Bioregenerative Life Support Systems

BLSS Compartmentalization and Control Challenges

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems function as materially closed artificial ecosystems that regenerate essential resources through biological processes. A representative architecture is the MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) loop, developed by the European Space Agency, which comprises five interconnected compartments, each with specific metabolic functions [52]. As shown in Figure 1, these compartments form a closed loop where waste materials are progressively broken down and converted into usable resources.

The MELiSSA loop exemplifies the control challenges in BLSS. Compartment C1 uses thermophilic anaerobic bacteria to break down solid waste, producing volatile fatty acids and carbon dioxide [52]. Compartment C2, a photoheterotrophic compartment, further processes these intermediates, while compartment C3 performs nitrification, converting ammonia to nitrates [52]. Compartments C4a (algae) and C4b (higher plants) utilize these nutrients along with crew-respired COâ‚‚ to produce oxygen, food, and clean water through photosynthesis [52]. Finally, compartment C5 (the crew) consumes these resources, generating waste that re-enters the system [52]. This complex interdependence creates a network of stoichiometric relationships that must remain balanced for stable system operation [52].

The primary control challenges in BLSS include managing time-varying dynamics (e.g., diurnal plant physiological cycles, changing crew metabolic rates), handling significant time delays in biological processes (e.g., plant growth responses to environmental changes), dealing with nonlinearities in biological growth kinetics, and accommodating model uncertainties due to interspecies variability and evolving system parameters [52] [67]. Furthermore, BLSS must maintain operation within strict biological constraints to ensure crew safety and system stability, making the explicit constraint handling capabilities of MPC particularly valuable.

MPC Implementation Strategies for BLSS

Implementing MPC in BLSS requires distinct strategies tailored to the unique characteristics of biological systems and space mission constraints. A hierarchical control architecture is often most effective, with fast local controllers managing individual compartment variables (e.g., temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen) while supervisory MPC coordinates the overall system material flows and maintains stoichiometric balance [52]. This approach distributes the computational burden while maintaining system-wide optimization.

Key implementation considerations for BLSS include:

• Model development: Creating accurate yet computationally tractable models of biological processes that capture essential dynamics without excessive complexity. Stoichiometric models based on elemental mass balances of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen have proven effective for describing material flows in BLSS [52].
• Robustness to uncertainty: Biological systems exhibit significant variability and uncertainty. Robust MPC formulations that explicitly account for model-patient mismatch or stochastic MPC approaches that incorporate uncertainty distributions are often necessary [68].
• Computational efficiency: Spaceflight hardware has limited processing capabilities. Explicit MPC solutions, which pre-compute the control law offline, or fast optimization algorithms tailored for embedded systems can address this challenge [68].
• Adaptation and learning: Biological systems evolve over time. Adaptive MPC techniques that periodically update model parameters based on measured data can maintain performance as the system changes [68].

For the plant cultivation compartment (C4b in MELiSSA), MPC can optimize environmental parameters (COâ‚‚, light intensity, nutrient delivery) to maximize photosynthetic efficiency and food production while minimizing resource consumption [67]. Different control strategies are required depending on mission duration: short-duration missions may focus on fast-growing salad crops, while long-duration missions require staple crops with higher resource demands but greater caloric and nutritional value [67].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Stoichiometric Modeling for BLSS

Stoichiometric modeling provides the fundamental framework for describing material flows in BLSS and forms the basis for MPC design. The development of a stoichiometric model for a fully closed BLSS involves systematically accounting for the flow of elements (C, H, O, N) through all system compartments [52]. The experimental protocol for establishing such a model consists of:

• Elemental Analysis: Determine the elemental composition (C, H, O, N percentages) of all major biomass components in the system, including human waste, microbial biomass, plant material, and food products using standard elemental analysis techniques [52].

• Process Stoichiometry: Establish balanced chemical equations for each major biological process in the system, including:

  • Aerobic and anaerobic waste degradation
  • Photosynthesis and respiration
  • Nitrification and denitrification
  • Human metabolic processes [52]

• System Closure Analysis: Identify all material inputs and outputs for each compartment and calculate conversion efficiencies to pinpoint where material losses occur in the system [52].

• Model Validation: Compare model predictions with experimental data from ground-based test facilities, such as the Lunar Palace 1 (China) or the MELiSSA Pilot Plant (Spain), which have demonstrated material closure rates exceeding 98% [52] [20].

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Experimentation

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Context
Limnospira indica (Arthrospira)	Photosynthetic oxygen production, food source	C4a compartment; converts COâ‚‚ to Oâ‚‚ and biomass [52]
Nitrosomonas europaea	Ammonia oxidation to nitrite	C3 compartment; waste nitrogen processing [52]
Nitrobacter winogradskyi	Nitrite oxidation to nitrate	C3 compartment; completes nitrification [52]
Thermophilic anaerobes	Solid waste degradation	C1 compartment; breaks down complex organics [52]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)	Staple food production, air revitalization	C4b compartment; provides carbohydrates, Oâ‚‚ [67]
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)	Fresh food production, water transpiration	C4b compartment; provides vitamins, phytochemicals [67]
Rhizobium spp.	Biological nitrogen fixation	Potential addition to C4b; reduces fertilizer needs [67]

MPC Design and Tuning Methodology

The design and implementation of MPC for BLSS requires a systematic approach to ensure robust performance. The experimental methodology involves:

• System Identification:

  • Apply pseudo-random binary sequences or amplitude-modulated prbs signals to process inputs to excite system dynamics without driving the biological system outside safe operating limits.
  • Record corresponding output responses at sampling intervals appropriate for process dynamics (typically minutes to hours for different BLSS compartments).
  • Use prediction error methods or subspace identification techniques to develop discrete-time state-space or transfer function models from experimental data [68].

• Controller Formulation:

  • Define prediction and control horizons based on process settling times (typically 20-60 samples for prediction, 3-10 samples for control).
  • Establish weighting matrices Q and R that balance tracking performance against control effort through iterative simulation studies.
  • Formulate operational constraints based on biological limits (e.g., dissolved Oâ‚‚ > 4 mg/L, pH 6.5-7.5, NH₃ < 0.5 mg/L) [68].

• Performance Validation:

  • Test controller performance with historical data sets from BLSS test facilities.
  • Conduct pilot-scale experiments with gradual introduction of disturbances (e.g., simulated crew activity changes, waste composition variations).
  • Evaluate robustness to sensor failures or measurement noise by introducing simulated faults [68].

The experimental workflow for developing and validating MPC for BLSS applications follows a structured process from initial system analysis through to implementation, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Current Research Status and Future Directions

Technological Gaps and Research Needs

Despite significant advances in both MPC methodologies and BLSS development, several critical technological gaps remain. A primary challenge is the limited space-based validation of integrated BLSS with advanced control systems [20]. While ground-based facilities like China's Lunar Palace 1 have demonstrated closed human survival for a year with material closure exceeding 98%, space-based testing has been limited to individual components rather than complete systems [20]. Additionally, the impact of space environmental conditions (microgravity, increased radiation, magnetic fields) on the biological components of BLSS and their control requirements remains inadequately characterized [67].

Specific research needs include:

• Radiation effects characterization: Systematic studies on how space radiation affects the growth and metabolic processes of BLSS organisms, and how MPC strategies must adapt to these effects [3] [67].
• Reduced gravity adaptation: Investigation of plant and microbial physiology under partial gravity conditions (Moon: 0.16g, Mars: 0.38g) to inform model development for MPC [67].
• Fault detection and isolation: Development of specialized MPC strategies that can detect and compensate for component failures or performance degradation in BLSS [68].
• Multi-timescale coordination: Creation of MPC architectures that can simultaneously manage fast processes (gas exchange) and slow processes (plant growth) in an integrated manner [52].

The historical discontinuation of NASA's Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) and similar programs has created significant capability gaps in the United States, while China has advanced substantially with its Beijing Lunar Palace program [3]. Recent initiatives, such as Purdue University's research on biological in-situ resource utilization, aim to address these gaps by developing technologies for processing local resources (frozen water, regolith) to support surface greenhouse agriculture [8].

Emerging Applications and Implementation Trends

MPC applications in biological systems are expanding beyond traditional BLSS to include emerging areas relevant to long-duration space missions. In the pharmaceutical domain, MPC is being applied to optimize drug manufacturing processes and personalized drug delivery systems [68]. The integration of machine learning techniques with MPC represents a significant advancement, where data-driven methods enhance model accuracy and adaptability for complex biological processes [68].

Key implementation trends include:

• Personalized control strategies: Development of MPC systems that can adapt to individual crew member physiological responses and nutritional needs [68].
• Distributed MPC architectures: Implementation of coordinated MPC networks where individual compartment controllers communicate to maintain system-wide optimization while reducing computational burden [68].
• Biomedical integration: Extension of MPC to manage crew health parameters in conjunction with environmental conditions, creating truly integrated human-habitat control systems [66] [68].

The global market for MPC in biomedical applications reflects growing interest in these technologies, with estimated market valuations of approximately 2.3 billion USD in 2022 and projected compound annual growth of 11.7% through 2028 [68]. This commercial growth is driving increased investment in research and development, potentially accelerating technology readiness for space applications.

For future lunar and Martian missions, the most promising near-term applications of MPC in BLSS include managing hybrid systems where biological components complement physicochemical processes, gradually increasing closure as technology matures [3] [67]. The continued development and validation of MPC for BLSS will be essential for achieving the high levels of autonomy and reliability required for human exploration beyond low Earth orbit.

Species Selection Criteria for Resilience and Multifunctionality

The development of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) is critical for sustaining long-duration human space missions by regenerating essential resources through biological processes. This whitepaper establishes a comprehensive framework for selecting biological species based on resilience and multifunctionality criteria. Drawing upon current research into non-vascular plants and traditional ecological knowledge, we present standardized experimental protocols for quantifying species performance across multiple ecosystem functions. Our analysis demonstrates that strategic species selection—incorporating metrics for physiological resilience, functional versatility, and complementary interactions—significantly enhances BLSS stability and efficiency. The methodologies and criteria outlined provide a foundation for advancing BLSS research and development, addressing urgent needs in bioastronautics and sustainable space exploration.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent a critical technological frontier for enabling long-duration human space missions beyond low-Earth orbit. These closed-loop systems rely on biological processes to regenerate oxygen, purify water, recycle waste, and produce food, thereby reducing dependence on resupply missions from Earth [12]. Current BLSS research has predominantly focused on higher plants and microalgae, creating a significant gap in understanding the potential contributions of other biological components, particularly non-vascular plants like bryophytes [12].

The concept of multifunctionality—whereby species contribute simultaneously to multiple ecosystem functions—has emerged as a fundamental principle for optimizing BLSS design. In terrestrial ecology, studies have demonstrated that species contribute unequally to individual functions, and that the community composition that maximizes individual functions often differs from what maximizes multifunctionality [69]. Furthermore, the functional role of individual species and the effect of interspecific interactions can be modified by changing environmental conditions [69].

This technical guide establishes species selection criteria based on resilience and multifunctionality principles specifically tailored for BLSS applications. By integrating recent research on aquatic bryophytes as novel BLSS components with broader ecological principles of multifunctionality, we provide a standardized framework for evaluating and selecting species that can enhance system stability, redundancy, and efficiency in the constrained environments of space habitats.

Species Evaluation Framework for BLSS

Core Selection Criteria

Multifunctionality Metrics: Species should be evaluated based on their capacity to simultaneously perform multiple ecosystem functions relevant to BLSS operations. Key functions include gas exchange (Oâ‚‚ production, COâ‚‚ sequestration), water purification (contaminant removal, nutrient recycling), biomass production, and waste processing. The multifunctionality index (MI) should be calculated as the sum of standardized values across all measured functions, with weighting factors applied based on mission-specific priorities [69].

Resilience Parameters: Species must maintain functionality under the abnormal environmental conditions of space, including microgravity, radiation exposure, atmospheric composition changes, and resource limitations. Resilience should be quantified through performance stability metrics under stress conditions, recovery rates post-stress, and adaptive capacity across environmental gradients [12].

Complementarity Potential: Selection should prioritize species with complementary functional traits that can operate synergistically within multi-species BLSS communities. This includes temporal complementarity (functions performed at different times) and spatial complementarity (functions performed in different niches) [69].

Quantitative Performance Assessment

Table 1: Comparative Performance Metrics of Aquatic Bryophytes in BLSS Applications

Species	Photosynthetic Efficiency (Fv/Fm)	NH₄⁺-N Removal Rate (%)	Heavy Metal Accumulation	Biomass Productivity (g DW/m²/day)	Multifunctionality Index
Taxiphyllum barbieri	0.78 ± 0.03	82.5 ± 4.2	Moderate	12.3 ± 1.5	0.85
Leptodictyum riparium	0.72 ± 0.04	94.7 ± 3.8	High (Zn, Cd)	10.8 ± 1.2	0.79
Vesicularia montagnei	0.69 ± 0.05	76.3 ± 5.1	Low	9.5 ± 1.1	0.64

Table 2: Resilience Indicators Under Stress Conditions

Stress Factor	Measurement Parameter	T. barbieri	L. riparium	V. montagnei
Low Light (200 μmol/m²/s)	Photosynthetic adaptation	High	Moderate	Low
Temperature Fluctuation (±5°C)	Physiological stability	Moderate	High	Moderate
Nutrient Limitation	Nutrient uptake efficiency	78.3%	85.6%	71.2%
Heavy Metal Exposure	Antioxidant activity	Moderate	High	Low

Experimental Methodologies for Species Evaluation

Physiological Performance Assessment

Gas Exchange Measurements: Utilize infrared gas analyzers (IRGA) to quantify net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), and transpiration rate (E) under controlled environment conditions. Standard measurements should be taken at light intensities of 200, 400, 600, and 800 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ to establish light response curves. Atmospheric CO₂ concentration should be maintained at 400 ppm for baseline measurements, with variations to simulate BLSS scenarios [12].

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analysis: Employ pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry to assess photosystem II (PSII) efficiency. Key parameters include maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), effective quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII), photochemical quenching (qP), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Measurements should be taken after 30 minutes of dark adaptation for Fv/Fm, and under actinic light for operational parameters [12].

Antioxidant Activity Profiling: Evaluate oxidative stress response by measuring antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase) and non-enzymatic antioxidants (glutathione, ascorbate, carotenoids) under standard and stress conditions. Stress induction should include heavy metal exposure (Zn, Cd at 0.1-1.0 mM) and oxidative stressors (Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚ at 1-10 mM) [12].

Biofiltration Efficiency Protocols

Nutrient Removal Capacity: Conduct batch experiments with synthetic wastewater containing known concentrations of nitrogen compounds (NH₄⁺-N, NO₂⁻-N, NO₃⁻-N) and phosphorus. Monitor concentration changes over 72 hours using spectrophotometric methods (Nesslerization for NH₄⁺, diazotization for NO₂⁻, cadmium reduction for NO₃⁻, ascorbic acid method for PO₄³⁻). Calculate removal rates and efficiency constants [12].

Heavy Metal Biosorption: Expose specimens to solutions containing heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Cd, Pb) at concentrations of 1-100 mg/L for 24-168 hours. Quantify metal accumulation using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Determine biosorption isotherms (Langmuir, Freundlich models) and kinetic parameters [12].

Microbial Load Management: Assess biofilm formation potential and microbial community dynamics using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, DNA sequencing (16S rRNA), and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Compare with algal systems known for problematic biofilm formation that can clog filtration systems [12].

Diagram 1: Species Evaluation Framework for BLSS

Experimental Workflow for BLSS Species Screening

Diagram 2: BLSS Species Screening Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Materials for BLSS Species Evaluation

Reagent/Equipment	Specification	Experimental Function	BLSS Relevance
PAM Fluorometer	Pulse-amplitude modulation system	Photosystem II efficiency quantification	Monitor plant health under artificial lighting
Infrared Gas Analyzer (IRGA)	COâ‚‚/Hâ‚‚O differential detection	Photosynthesis and transpiration rate measurement	Optimize atmospheric gas exchange
Atomic Absorption Spectrometer	Element-specific light absorption	Heavy metal uptake quantification	Assess contaminant removal capacity
Synthetic Wastewater Formulation	Defined N/P/K composition	Biofiltration performance testing	Simulate BLSS wastewater streams
Antioxidant Assay Kits	SOD, CAT, POD activity assays	Oxidative stress response measurement	Evaluate resilience to space radiation
Controlled Environment Chambers	Programmable light/temperature	Standardized growth conditions	Simulate BLSS environmental parameters
DNA Sequencing Reagents	16S rRNA amplification primers	Microbial community analysis	Monitor system microbiological stability

Discussion and Implementation Guidelines

The selection criteria and experimental protocols presented herein provide a standardized approach for evaluating species for BLSS applications. The quantitative metrics enable direct comparison between candidate species and facilitate informed selection based on mission-specific requirements.

Recent research demonstrates the particular promise of aquatic bryophytes like Taxiphyllum barbieri and Leptodictyum riparium as novel BLSS components due to their high multifunctionality indices, with T. barbieri exhibiting superior photosynthetic efficiency and L. riparium showing exceptional biofiltration capacity for nitrogen compounds and heavy metals [12]. These species represent underutilized biological resources that can complement traditional BLSS approaches focused on vascular plants and algae.

Implementation of these selection criteria must consider the strategic context of BLSS development. Current geopolitical dynamics in space exploration highlight the urgency of advancing BLSS capabilities, with the China National Space Administration having demonstrated significant progress through their Lunar Palace program, while NASA faces critical gaps due to historical program discontinuations [3]. The systematic evaluation of species based on resilience and multifunctionality principles is essential for maintaining international competitiveness in human space exploration.

Future research directions should include investigation of species interactions in multi-species BLSS communities, long-term performance under simulated space conditions, and genetic optimization of selected species for enhanced functionality. The integration of traditional ecological knowledge from terrestrial communities, such as the Quilombola communities in Brazil who employ sophisticated criteria for selecting plant species based on multifunctionality and availability, may provide additional insights for BLSS species selection strategies [70].

Hypergravity Testing and Predictive Yield Modeling for Crop Optimization

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent the most advanced life support technology for long-duration space missions and extraterrestrial habitats, functioning as artificial ecosystems that use complex symbiotic relationships among higher plants, animals, and microorganisms [71]. These systems are designed to simultaneously revitalize atmosphere, purify water, and generate food for crew members, thereby reducing reliance on resupply from Earth [9] [20]. The closure of the carbon loop is particularly critical for distant settlements like lunar or Martian bases, where resupply costs are prohibitively high [72]. Within this framework, crop optimization is paramount for achieving system sustainability, as plants provide essential functions of biomass productivity, oxygen production, carbon dioxide fixation, and water purification [71] [9].

The integration of hypergravity testing and predictive yield modeling addresses fundamental challenges in BLSS development. Earth-based BLSS experiments, such as China's "Lunar Palace 365" project, have achieved material closure rates exceeding 98% [20]. However, the ultimate application of BLSS in space remains uncertain due to the unknown overall impact of space environments, including variable gravity conditions, on ecosystem performance [20]. This technical guide explores the synergistic application of controlled hypergravity experimentation and artificial intelligence-driven modeling to advance crop optimization strategies for BLSS, providing methodologies and insights relevant to researchers and scientists working toward sustainable human presence in deep space.

Hypergravity Testing for Plant Research in BLSS

Theoretical Foundations and Scaling Principles

Hypergravity testing using centrifuges provides a critical experimental platform for studying plant growth and development under elevated gravity conditions relevant to space adaptation and BLSS optimization. The fundamental principle behind this approach is stress similitude, where the hypergravity field imposed during a centrifuge test creates stress conditions in scaled models representative of full-scale prototypes [73]. For example, the profile of vertical effective stress in a 0.5-meter-high plant growth system at 100g is equivalent to the stress profile in a 50-meter-tall system in Earth's gravity [73].

This scaled modeling approach creates an accessible research domain that provides a larger parameter space to explore than is possible in 1g model space or field conditions alone [73]. Centrifuge modeling offers particular advantages for studying gravitational effects on porous media, fluid, and gas-related phenomena in plant growth systems, where self-weight body forces significantly influence fundamental processes [73]. The "hypergravity model space" enables researchers to accurately simulate a broader range of field conditions relevant to BLSS implementation in variable-gravity environments.

Experimental Apparatus and Capabilities

Research-grade centrifuges for hypergravity plant studies range from small-scale systems to large facilities capable of accommodating significant plant growth apparatus. The UC Davis Center for Geotechnical Modeling (CGM), for instance, operates both 1-meter and 9-meter radius geotechnical centrifuges that can be applied to biological research [73]. The 1-meter centrifuge can subject approximately 50 kg of soil to centrifugal acceleration of 100g, while the 9-meter centrifuge can handle approximately 1,550 kg of soil at 80g, representing prototype soil depths of up to 50 meters [73].

Specialized centrifuges for biomedical and plant research have been developed with capabilities reaching accelerations up to 36gz, featuring dual-arm designs that allow simultaneous experiments and integrated monitoring systems [74]. These systems typically include digital cameras for visual documentation of biological responses during rotation and accelerometers for precise gravity measurement [74]. The modular hydraulic and electro-mechanical actuation systems available in advanced facilities enable complex experimental setups, including in-situ characterization tools and environmental monitoring systems relevant to plant growth studies [73].

Documented Plant Responses to Hypergravity

Research into plant germination and growth under hypergravity conditions has demonstrated significant physiological responses. One study examining Eruca Sativa Mill seeds exposed to 7.0 gz showed accelerated germination, occurring in 3 days compared to 4 days for control groups at 1g [74]. Growth measurements further revealed a significant mean height increase of 2.2 cm at 7gz versus 1.8 cm at 1g (p = 0.02) [74].

The biochemical and morphological mechanisms underlying these responses include changes in cell wall dynamics, membrane properties, and cytoskeleton organization. Plants subjected to chronic acceleration demonstrate modifications in growth patterns, metabolic processes, and biomechanical structures [74]. These adaptations represent valuable data points for understanding plant plasticity and potential optimization strategies for BLSS applications in variable gravity environments.

Table 1: Documented Plant Responses to Hypergravity Conditions

Plant Parameter	Experimental Condition	Observed Response	Research Context
Germination rate	Eruca Sativa Mill at 7.0 gz	25% reduction in germination time (3 days vs. 4 days)	Laboratory centrifuge experiment [74]
Early growth height	Eruca Sativa Mill at 7.0 gz	Significant height increase (2.2 cm vs. 1.8 cm, p=0.02)	Laboratory centrifuge experiment [74]
Metabolic processes	Various species under chronic acceleration	Modified growth patterns and biochemical adaptations	Biomedical hypergravity research [74]

Predictive Yield Modeling with Artificial Intelligence

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches

Predictive yield modeling using artificial intelligence has emerged as a powerful decision support tool for crop optimization, with direct applications to BLSS management. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques can analyze complex, multidimensional relationships between genotype, environment, and management factors to generate accurate yield forecasts [75] [76]. These models treat crop yield as an implicit, highly non-linear function of input variables, enabling them to capture complex interactions that traditional statistical methods might miss [76].

The most widely used machine learning algorithms in crop yield prediction include Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) [75] [77]. In the deep learning domain, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have demonstrated particularly strong performance [75] [76] [77]. The representation learning capability of deep neural networks allows them to find underlying data patterns without handcrafted input features, with multiple stacked non-linear layers transforming raw input data into progressively higher and more abstract representations [76].

Effective yield prediction models integrate diverse data sources to capture the multifaceted influences on crop performance. The most significant features employed in these models include:

• Environmental Factors: Temperature, rainfall, solar radiation, vapor pressure, and day length [75] [76]
• Soil Properties: Percentage of clay, silt, and sand, available water capacity (AWC), soil pH, organic matter (OM), cation-exchange capacity (CEC), and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (KSAT) [76]
• Crop Genetic Information: High-dimensional marker data containing thousands to millions of genetic markers for each plant individual [76]
• Vegetation Indices: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) derived from remote sensing [77]

Research analyzing the relative importance of these factors has revealed that environmental conditions generally have a greater effect on crop yield than genetic factors, highlighting the critical importance of environmental control and monitoring in BLSS applications [76].

Model Performance and Implementation

Advanced AI models for yield prediction have demonstrated remarkable accuracy in research settings. Studies have reported prediction precision within 5-10% of actual crop yields, with some models achieving R² values exceeding 0.9 [78] [76]. In the 2018 Syngenta Crop Challenge, a winning deep neural network approach achieved a root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of just 12% of the average yield and 50% of the standard deviation for validation datasets [76].

The performance of various algorithms has been systematically evaluated using metrics including R² Score (measuring the proportion of variance explained by the model), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for quantifying prediction accuracy, and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for evaluating prediction variability [78]. Comparative studies indicate that hybrid machine learning models can achieve prediction accuracies exceeding 90% by integrating multiple algorithmic approaches [78].

Table 2: Performance Metrics of AI Approaches for Crop Yield Prediction

Algorithm	Typical R² Score	Key Strengths	Optimal Application Context
Random Forest	0.85-0.92	Handles complex, non-linear relationships; robust to outliers	Multi-factor environments with complex interactions [78] [77]
Deep Neural Networks (DNN)	0.88-0.95	Automatic feature extraction; models complex non-linearities	Large datasets with high-dimensional inputs [76] [77]
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)	0.87-0.93	Superior image processing; spatial pattern recognition	Yield prediction from satellite or drone imagery [75] [77]
Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM)	0.86-0.94	Temporal pattern capture; sequential data processing	Time-series yield forecasting [75] [77]

Integrated Methodologies for BLSS Crop Optimization

Experimental Protocol: Hypergravity Plant Studies

A standardized methodology for hypergravity plant experiments includes the following key stages:

• Experimental Design Definition:

  • Select gravity levels (e.g., 1.5gz, 7.0gz) based on research objectives [74]
  • Determine exposure protocols (continuous vs. intermittent)
  • Define control groups (1g conditions)

• Apparatus Configuration:

  • Install plant growth chambers on centrifuge platforms
  • Implement lighting systems with appropriate spectra for photosynthesis
  • Integrate irrigation and nutrient delivery systems compatible with hypergravity operation
  • Install sensors for environmental monitoring (soil moisture, temperature, humidity)

• Biological Material Preparation:

  • Select plant species relevant to BLSS (e.g., cereals, legumes, oilseed crops) [9]
  • Standardize germination protocols across experimental groups
  • Implement sterile techniques to prevent contamination

• Data Collection During Operation:

  • Monitor germination rates and timing [74]
  • Measure growth parameters (height, leaf area, biomass accumulation) at regular intervals
  • Document morphological changes through imaging
  • Collect tissue samples for biochemical analysis

• Post-Experiment Analysis:

  • Conduct destructive harvesting for biomass partitioning analysis
  • Perform physiological assessments (photosynthetic rates, nutrient composition)
  • Analyze data using appropriate statistical methods

Experimental Protocol: Predictive Model Development

A systematic methodology for developing AI-based yield prediction models includes:

• Data Acquisition and Integration:

  • Collect historical yield performance data [76]
  • Gather genotype information using molecular markers [76]
  • Compile environmental data (weather, soil properties) [76]
  • Integrate remote sensing data where available [77]

• Data Preprocessing:

  • Address missing values using appropriate imputation techniques [76]
  • Normalize or standardize features to comparable scales
  • Perform feature engineering to create meaningful predictive indicators
  • Partition data into training, validation, and test sets

• Model Selection and Training:

  • Select appropriate algorithm based on data characteristics and prediction goals
  • Implement neural networks with multiple hidden layers for deep learning approaches [76]
  • Apply batch normalization techniques to address vanishing/exploding gradient problems [76]
  • Utilize identity blocks or residual shortcuts to facilitate training of deeper networks [76]

• Model Validation and Interpretation:

  • Evaluate performance using validation datasets not used in training [76]
  • Apply Explainable AI techniques (SHAP, LIME) to interpret feature importance [78]
  • Perform feature selection based on trained model to reduce input dimensionality [76]

Integrated Workflow and Signaling Pathways

The synergistic relationship between hypergravity testing and predictive modeling can be visualized as an integrated workflow where experimental data informs model development, and model predictions guide targeted experimentation.

Diagram 1: Integrated hypergravity and AI modeling workflow for BLSS crop optimization.

The biological signaling pathways affected by hypergravity exposure represent critical mechanisms that influence crop yield and quality in BLSS environments.

Diagram 2: Plant signaling pathways and responses under hypergravity conditions.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Hypergravity and Predictive Modeling Studies

Research Tool	Function/Application	Technical Specifications	BLSS Relevance
Geotechnical Centrifuges	Simulate hypergravity conditions for plant studies	1m-9m radius; 50-1550 kg capacity; up to 100g acceleration [73]	Ground-based simulation of variable gravity environments for BLSS crop screening
Environmental Sensors	Monitor soil and atmospheric conditions in real-time	Soil moisture, temperature, pH, COâ‚‚, Oâ‚‚ sensors; IoT-enabled connectivity [78]	Continuous monitoring of BLSS growth parameters for system optimization
Genetic Marker Systems	Genotype characterization for predictive models	High-density SNP arrays; 19,465+ markers per hybrid [76]	Selection of optimal cultivars for BLSS environments based on genetic potential
Deep Learning Frameworks	Develop and train yield prediction models	TensorFlow, PyTorch; CNN, LSTM, DNN architectures [76] [77]	Forecasting BLSS crop performance under various controlled environment scenarios
Explainable AI Tools	Interpret model predictions and feature importance	SHAP, LIME; model-agnostic interpretation [78]	Understanding key yield-limiting factors in BLSS for targeted intervention
Hyperspectral Imaging	Non-destructive plant phenotyping	NDVI, EVI, LAI vegetation indices [77]	Monitoring crop health and development in space-constrained BLSS environments

The integration of hypergravity testing and predictive yield modeling represents a transformative approach to crop optimization for Bioregenerative Life Support Systems. Future research should prioritize space-based validation of ground-derived hypergravity responses, as the overall impact of space environments on BLSS remains unknown [20]. Lunar probe payload carrying experiments offer a promising near-term opportunity to study small uncrewed closed ecosystems in actual space conditions, providing critical data to correct design and operation parameters of Earth-based BLSS [20].

Advancements in Explainable AI will be particularly important for BLSS applications, where understanding model decision-making processes builds trust and enables more nuanced management decisions [78]. Techniques like SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) provide unprecedented insights into feature importance and prediction dynamics, allowing researchers to identify which factors most significantly influence yield predictions in closed ecological systems [78].

The convergence of hypergravity experimental data with AI-driven predictive models creates a powerful feedback loop for BLSS crop optimization. As these methodologies continue to evolve and integrate, they will accelerate the development of robust, productive, and sustainable food production systems essential for humanity's long-term presence in space.

Experimental Validation and International Capability Assessment

Ground-based analog facilities are indispensable terrestrial platforms for researching and developing Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS). These systems are critical for sustaining human life during long-duration space exploration missions beyond low-Earth orbit, where resupply from Earth becomes impractical [19]. A BLSS is an artificial ecosystem composed of producers (e.g., plants, microalgae), consumers (astronauts), and decomposers (microorganisms) that work in concert to recycle oxygen, water, and food, while processing waste [19] [10]. By simulating the isolated, confined, and extreme environments of space habitats on Earth, these analogs enable scientists to test technologies, study ecological stability, and investigate crew physiology and psychology in controlled settings, thereby de-risking future missions to the Moon and Mars [79] [10].

A global effort over the past six decades has led to the establishment of several landmark analog facilities, each with a specific research focus and contribution to BLSS development.

Historical and International Facilities

• NASA's BIO-Plex: The Bioregenerative Planetary Life Support Systems Test Complex (BIO-PLEX) was a fully integrated habitat demonstration program. It was designed to test regenerative life support technologies but was discontinued and physically demolished after the 2004 Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS), creating a strategic gap in U.S. capabilities [11].
• Biosphere 2 (USA): This large-scale, closed ecological system in Arizona was a pioneering effort to understand complex system interactions. It provided critical insights into the unpredictable challenges and "critical transitions" that can arise in closed environments, serving as a cautionary tale for system management [80] [10].
• BIOS Series (USSR/Russia): The BIOS facilities, including BIOS-1, 2, 3, and 3M, were among the first to explore closed ecosystems. They successfully demonstrated that microalgae and higher plants combined with physicochemical systems could support human life, with BIOS-3 achieving a closure where 95% of water and oxygen were regenerated [80] [19].
• Lunar Palace 1 (China): China's ground-based BLSS testbed, Lunar Palace 1 (LP1), represents a state-of-the-art facility. It integrates efficient plant cultivation, animal protein production, urine nitrogen recovery, and solid waste biotransformation. The landmark "Lunar Palace 365" experiment in this facility achieved Earth-based closed human survival for 370 days with a material closure rate exceeding 98%, a current world record [11] [81].
• CEEF (Japan): The Closed Ecology Experiment Facilities (CEEF) in Japan have been used to study material flows within a closed ecosystem, contributing valuable data on gas exchange and system stability [80].
• MELiSSA (ESA): The European Space Agency's Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) program is a robust effort focused on developing a closed-loop BLSS. It has led to the construction of the MELiSSA Pilot Plant (MPP) in Spain and a plant characterization unit (PaCMan) in Italy [11] [10].

Table 1: Key Ground-Based Analog Facilities for BLSS Research

Facility Name	Lead Agency/Country	Primary Research Focus	Notable Achievement/Duration
Lunar Palace 1	China/BUAA	Integrated BLSS (plants, waste, water, air)	370-day crewed mission (>98% closure) [81]
BIOS-3	USSR/Russia	Closed ecosystem with algae & plants	95% oxygen & water regeneration [19]
Biosphere 2	USA (Private)	Large-scale closed ecological system	Study of critical transitions & cascading failures [80]
CEEF	Japan	Material flow & gas exchange	Closed system material balance studies [80]
MELiSSA Pilot Plant	ESA (EU)	Compartmentalized closed-loop system	Testing individual BLSS compartments & integration [10]
NASA's BIO-Plex	USA (NASA)	Fully integrated habitat demonstration	Program discontinued in 2004 [11]

Performance Metrics for BLSS Analog Facilities

The performance and maturity of BLSS analogs are evaluated against a set of rigorous, quantifiable metrics. These metrics are essential for comparing systems and guiding development toward flight-ready technology.

Key Quantitative Metrics

• Closure Degree: This is a fundamental metric measuring the percentage of essential resources (oxygen, water, food) regenerated and recycled within the system without external input. Higher closure degrees reduce the need for resupply from Earth. China's Lunar Palace 365 experiment achieved a remarkable closure degree of >98% [81].
• Habitable Volume per Crew Member: This is a human factors metric critical for crew well-being and operational efficiency. Based on historical data, a preliminary design value for missions up to 12 months is approximately 20 m³ per crew member. The minimum volume for efficient task performance is 10 m³, while the absolute minimum tolerable volume is 5 m³ [79].
• Crop Readiness Level (CRL) & Technology Readiness Level (TRL): These scales assess the maturity of individual BLSS components and the overall system. Cohen's six-level TRL scale for simulators, for instance, ranges from Level 1 (conceptual projects) to Level 3 (full-scale concept testing and initial integration), which is the earliest stage for a structure to be considered an analog habitat [79].
• Trophic Network Complexity: This ecological metric evaluates the diversity and interconnectedness of the biological components (producers, consumers, decomposers). Higher complexity can enhance system resilience and stability but also increases the risk of unforeseen interactions and critical transitions [80].

Table 2: Core Performance Metrics for BLSS Evaluation

Metric Category	Specific Metric	Definition/Calculation	Target Value (Example)
System Closure	Mass Closure Degree	(1 - Mass imported / Mass consumed) × 100%	>98% (Lunar Palace 365) [81]
Crew Support	Habitable Volume	Volume per crew member (m³/person)	20 m³ for 12-month mission [79]
System Stability	Closure Index	Mathematical link between closure level and trophic network complexity [80]	System-specific; higher for more complex systems
Technology Maturity	Technology Readiness Level (TRL)	Scale from 1 (basic principles) to 9 (flight-proven) [79]	TRL 6-8 for integrated ground demo
Biological Productivity	Crop Yield	Edible biomass produced per unit area per day (g/m²/day)	Mission-dependent (e.g., staple vs. supplemental crops) [10]
Microbial Control	Airborne Microbial Load	Bacterial concentration in cabin air (via qPCR)	Below thresholds for health risk [81]

Limitations and Challenges of Current Analog Systems

Despite significant progress, ground-based analogs face inherent limitations that must be understood and mitigated before deploying BLSS in space.

Functional Stability and Critical Transitions

A primary challenge is the functional instability of complex closed ecosystems. Larger experiments like Biosphere 2 have demonstrated that increased complexity can lead to "critical transitions"—sudden, often irreversible changes that can cause system collapse. Instability in one subsystem, such as an unexpected shift in microbial populations, can cascade through other subsystems (e.g., plant health, water quality), leading to systemic failure [80]. Developing models to predict these transitions is an active area of research.

Impact of the Space Environment

A fundamental limitation of all ground-based analogs is their inability to fully replicate the space environment. Key differences include:

• Gravity: Terrestrial facilities operate under Earth's gravity (1g), while lunar and Martian gravity are 0.16g and 0.38g, respectively. Microgravity during transit is another critical factor. Gravity significantly affects fluid behavior, gas exchange, plant growth morphology, and root zone microbiota [10].
• Radiation: Space is characterized by higher levels of ionizing radiation, which can impact both plant and microbial biology, including DNA damage and mutation rates [10].
• Magnetic Fields and Atmospheric Pressure: These other environmental factors also differ and can influence biological processes in ways not testable on Earth [10].

Microbial and Crew Dynamics

The enclosed environment creates a unique microbiome. Studies from the Lunar Palace 365 experiment showed that the airborne bacterial community diversity is heavily influenced by crew changes, with most bacteria deriving from the crew and plants [81]. While no major pathogens have caused critical issues in analogs to date, the combination of confined spaces, potential for increased microbial transmission, reduced crew immunity, and the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) poses a continuous health risk that must be managed [81].

Diagram 1: Key Limitation Categories of Ground-Based Analogs

Experimental Protocols for BLSS Research

Rigorous, standardized experimental protocols are vital for generating comparable and reliable data across different analog facilities.

Protocol for Monitoring Airborne Microbiome Dynamics

Understanding the succession of microbial communities in a closed environment is critical for crew health. The following protocol was employed in the Lunar Palace 365 project [81].

• Objective: To characterize the dynamics of airborne microbial communities and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in a BLSS and assess the impact of crew changeover.
• Materials:
  • Sampling Equipment: High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter-based air purifiers (e.g., Xiaomi Air Purifier 2).
  • DNA Extraction Kit: Commercial kit for microbial genomic DNA extraction from filter dust.
  • Analysis Tools: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) system, next-generation sequencer for 16S rRNA amplicon and shot-gun metagenomic sequencing.
• Methodology:
  • Sampling: Place HEPA filter samplers in key locations (e.g., plant cabin, comprehensive crew cabin, waste treatment cabin). Sample continuously over discrete periods (e.g., 30 days) to accumulate sufficient biomass.
  • DNA Extraction: Aseptically collect dust from the filters at the end of each sampling period. Extract total genomic DNA from the dust samples.
  • Quantitative Analysis: Use qPCR to determine the absolute abundance of total bacteria and specific ARGs.
  • Community Analysis: Perform 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to profile bacterial community diversity and composition.
  • Functional Potential: Conduct metagenomic sequencing to assess the functional gene potential and comprehensively identify ARGs and mobile genetic elements.
  • Data Analysis: Use bioinformatics and statistical tools (e.g., source tracking analysis) to correlate microbial shifts with operational events like crew changeovers.
• Key Outputs: Bacterial concentration (copies/m³), community alpha- and beta-diversity indices, relative abundance of taxa, and abundance of specific ARGs.

Diagram 2: Airborne Microbiome Monitoring Workflow

Protocol for Assessing System Stability and Closure

This protocol focuses on evaluating the overall material balance and functional stability of a BLSS, which is essential for proving its long-term viability [80] [81].

• Objective: To quantify the degree of mass closure and identify early warning signals of critical transitions within the BLSS.
• Materials:
  • Mass Flow Sensors: Precision sensors for water and gas input/output.
  • Data Logging System: Centralized system for continuous data collection from all subsystems.
  • Biomass Tracking System: Protocols for weighing all biomass (food, plant, waste) entering and leaving the system.
• Methodology:
  • Mass Balance Accounting: Precisely measure and log all mass inputs (e.g., crew food, water, gases, plant nutrients) and outputs (e.g., waste, processed water, oxygen) over the entire mission duration.
  • Closure Index Calculation: Calculate the mass closure degree using the formula: Closure Degree = (1 - (Mass imported / Mass consumed)) × 100%.
  • Subsystem Monitoring: Continuously monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) of each subsystem (plant growth rates, oxygen production, water purity, waste processing efficiency).
  • Stability Modeling: Use a generalized framework model to analyze time-series data from step 3. Statistical indicators (e.g., increasing variance or autocorrelation) can serve as early warning signals for an impending critical transition in a subsystem.
  • Cascading Failure Analysis: If a perturbation or instability is detected in one subsystem, model and monitor its potential effects on interconnected subsystems.
• Key Outputs: Overall system closure degree (%), material flow maps, stability indices for subsystems, and predictive alerts for potential failures.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Successful BLSS research relies on a suite of specialized reagents, tools, and technologies to monitor, maintain, and manipulate the closed ecosystem.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Experiments

Reagent/Material	Primary Function	Application Example	Citation
HEPA Filter Samplers	Collection of airborne microbial particles for microbiome analysis.	Monitoring succession of air dust microbiomes and ARGs in Lunar Palace 365.	[81]
DNA Extraction Kits	Isolation of high-quality genomic DNA from complex samples (dust, soil, water).	Preparing DNA for 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing of BLSS microbiomes.	[81]
qPCR Assays & Reagents	Absolute quantification of specific bacterial groups and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).	Tracking abundance of total bacteria and specific ARGs like tet(K) in air dust.	[81]
16S rRNA Primers	Amplification of conserved bacterial gene for community profiling.	Determining bacterial diversity and species composition via amplicon sequencing.	[81]
Plant Probiotics	Beneficial microorganisms used to enhance plant growth and stress resistance.	Improving crop yield and resilience in the BLSS plant cultivation compartment.	[19]
Hydroponic Nutrients	Precise mineral nutrient solutions for soilless plant cultivation.	Growing crops (lettuce, wheat, potato) in controlled environment agriculture systems.	[19] [10]
Growth-Promoting Nanoparticles	Nanoscale carriers for activator proteins to stimulate plant growth.	Potential application to enhance crop productivity in space BLSS.	[19]

Ground-based analog facilities are the foundational testbeds for achieving the bioregenerative life support required for sustainable human exploration of deep space. Facilities like China's Lunar Palace 1, Russia's BIOS-3, and ESA's MELiSSA have demonstrated remarkable progress in closing material loops and supporting long-duration crewed missions. Performance is quantitatively assessed through metrics such as closure degree, habitable volume, and technology readiness levels. However, significant limitations remain, including functional instabilities like critical transitions, the inherent inability to replicate microgravity and space radiation on Earth, and the complex dynamics of crew-microbe interactions. Future research must focus on integrating high-fidelity modeling to predict system stability, conducting experiments in Low Earth Orbit to bridge the gravity and radiation gap, and standardizing protocols across international partners. Only by systematically addressing these challenges through continued analog research can robust and reliable BLSS be deployed for the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent the most advanced life support technology, designed to sustain human life during long-duration space missions through artificial ecosystems. These systems create complex symbiotic relationships among higher plants, animals, and microorganisms to regenerate oxygen, purify water, recycle waste, and produce food [71]. As space missions extend deeper into space with multiple crew members, the dependency on resupply missions from Earth becomes impractical and prohibitively expensive. BLSS addresses this challenge by closing the carbon loop through biological processes, moving beyond the physicochemical subsystems that currently handle water and oxygen regeneration in the International Space Station [72]. The ultimate goal of BLSS research is to create Earth-like habitation environments that can support human survival for extended periods without external resupply, with China's "Lunar Palace 365" experiment already achieving material closure of more than 98% for year-long Earth-based human survival [20].

Within this framework, crop production serves as a fundamental component of BLSS, responsible not only for food generation but also for atmospheric revitalization through carbon dioxide fixation and oxygen production. The selection of appropriate plant species involves careful consideration of multiple factors including nutritional value, growth characteristics, environmental requirements, and compatibility with controlled environments. Among the various candidates, millet, wheat, and lettuce have emerged as particularly relevant for space agriculture due to their complementary nutritional profiles, environmental adaptability, and research history in space analog environments. This technical guide examines the experimental approaches, quantitative findings, and methodological considerations for testing these crops under simulated space conditions, providing researchers with actionable protocols for BLSS-oriented crop research.

Fundamental Environmental Parameters for Space Crop Testing

Simulating space conditions for crop testing requires meticulous control of environmental parameters that differ substantially from terrestrial agriculture. These factors must be carefully replicated in ground-based research facilities to generate meaningful data predictive of space performance.

Radiation Exposure Parameters

Space radiation presents a fundamental challenge to crop viability and productivity. The deep space radiation environment consists of a complex mixture of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), solar particle events (SPEs), and trapped radiation, all characterized by different energy spectra and biological impacts. The MISSE-Seed project provided valuable environmental monitoring data, recording radiation exposures of 330–469 μGy/day with 0.6 g cm⁻² shielding based on passive thermoluminescent dosimeter readings [82]. Active radiation monitoring in the same experiment detected 506 μGy/day from protons, 81.4 μGy/day from GCRs, and 89 μGy/day from energetic electrons [82]. Without adequate shielding, ultraviolet radiation presents an additional stressor, with recorded fluence levels of 834–1130 MJ m⁻² in the 200–400 nm range [82].

For experimental purposes, researchers employ both actual space exposure on platforms like the Materials International Space Station Experiment Flight Facility (MISSE-FF) and ground-based simulation using particle accelerators and radioactive sources. The MISSE-FF platform provides NASA's closest analog to the long-duration deep space radiation environment with sample return capabilities, offering a true low-dose rate environment with a broad spectrum of charged particles that cannot be accurately simulated on Earth [82]. Ground-based facilities typically use gamma rays from radioactive sources (e.g., Cs-137, Co-60) or particle accelerators providing protons and heavy ions, though these approaches have limitations in replicating the exact spectral qualities and dose rates of space radiation.

Temperature and Atmospheric Extremes

The thermal environment in space exhibits extreme fluctuations that challenge biological systems. External space exposure on the International Space Station records temperature variations from -27°C to 46°C during each 90-minute orbital cycle [82]. The MISSE passive exposure containers (MPECs) were specifically developed to mitigate these fluctuations for biological samples, incorporating aerogel foam and polyimide foam insulation layers to create more stable internal temperatures [82]. Pre-flight thermal testing subjected MPECs to 90-minute cycles of -37°C to 37°C to validate their protective capabilities, with the configuration incorporating both polyimide and Spaceloft aerogel layers demonstrating the most effective thermal buffering [82].

Atmospheric composition represents another critical variable, with space habitats typically maintaining different gas concentrations than Earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide levels may be elevated compared to terrestrial environments, while oxygen concentrations require careful regulation to support both human respiration and plant physiological functions. Experimental protocols must therefore incorporate precise atmospheric control systems to simulate these conditions, monitoring not only Oâ‚‚ and COâ‚‚ levels but also trace volatile organic compounds that may accumulate in closed systems.

Microgravity and Partial Gravity Effects

Gravitational influences on plant growth present unique challenges for space agriculture. Plants have demonstrated remarkable adaptability to microgravity conditions, with some species like wheat growing 10% taller compared to Earth-grown specimens in the PESTO experiment [83]. The Seedling Growth investigations revealed that seedlings acclimate to microgravity by modulating expression of genes related to space stressors, providing insights into plant physiological adaptations [83]. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's Plant Gravity Sensing investigation further examined how microgravity affects calcium levels within plant cells, a key mechanism in gravitropism [83].

For simulating these conditions terrestrially, researchers employ clinostats and random positioning machines to disrupt gravitropic responses, though these approaches cannot fully replicate the space environment. The recent capability to conduct plant cell imaging in artificial gravity-generating research incubators, as mentioned in Expedition 73 crew activities, provides new opportunities for comparative analysis of plant responses to different gravity conditions [84].

Table 1: Key Environmental Parameters for Space Simulation in Crop Research

Parameter	Space Condition	Simulation Approach	Measurement Tools
Radiation	330-469 μGy/day (with shielding)	Particle accelerators, radioactive sources, space exposure platforms	Thermoluminescent dosimeters, active radiation monitors
Temperature	-27°C to 46°C (external ISS)	Thermal chambers, insulated containment systems	Thermocouples, programmed iButton temperature recorders
UV Exposure	834-1130 MJ m⁻² (200-400 nm)	UV lamps, environmental chambers	UV spectrometers, dosimeters
Microgravity	Near 0g (orbital)	Clinostats, random positioning machines	Microscopy, gene expression analysis
Atmosphere	Controlled Oâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ levels	Environmental chambers, closed systems	Gas analyzers, environmental monitors

Current Crop Testing Platforms and Methodologies

Space-Based Agricultural Research Facilities

Multiple specialized facilities support crop testing aboard the International Space Station, each designed to address specific research questions while operating within the volume, mass, and power constraints of the space environment.

The Vegetable Production System (Veggie) serves as a fundamental platform for space crop research, providing a simple, low-power chamber approximately the size of a carry-on suitcase that can hold six plants [83]. The system employs a fabric "seed pillow" approach, with seeds embedded in pillows filled with clay-based growing medium similar to material used on baseball fields, supplemented with controlled-release fertilizer [85]. Veggie utilizes red, blue, and green LED lighting to provide the spectral quality necessary for plant growth, with clear flexible bellows that expand as crops mature to maintain a semi-controlled environment [85]. This platform has successfully grown multiple crops including Dragoon lettuce, Wasabi mustard greens, Red Russian kale, Extra Dwarf Pak Choi, and Outredgeous lettuce [85] [83].

The Advanced Plant Habitat (APH) represents a more sophisticated, fully automated facility designed for comprehensive plant growth studies with minimal crew intervention [83]. This system provides precise environmental control and extensive monitoring capabilities, enabling researchers to isolate specific variables affecting plant growth in microgravity. The APH supports longer-duration experiments and more complex experimental designs than Veggie, though it requires more resources to operate.

For external exposure studies, the Multipurpose Materials International Space Station Experiment—Flight Facility (MISSE-FF) provides a platform for investigating the effects of direct space exposure on biological materials [82]. The recently developed MISSE passive exposure containers (MPECs) offer specialized containment for biological samples, with dimensions of 7.5 × 7.5 × 2.5 cm fabricated from 6061-T651 aluminum plates [82]. These containers undergo rigorous validation testing, including thermal cycling and sealant biocompatibility assessments, to ensure sample integrity during extended space exposure.

Ground-Based Analog Systems

Earth-based research facilities provide essential platforms for preliminary testing and system validation before space deployment. These analogs incorporate varying degrees of environmental control and closure to simulate space conditions.

The BIOS-3 facility in Krasnoyarsk, Russia, represents an early BLSS analog that demonstrated the feasibility of closed ecological systems [71]. More recently, China's Yuegong-1 (Lunar Palace) facility has achieved remarkable closure durations, with the "Lunar Palace 365" experiment maintaining Earth-based human survival for a year with material closure exceeding 98% [71] [20].

NASA's collaboration with the Fairchild Botanical Garden through the "Growing Beyond Earth" program has engaged hundreds of middle and high school science classes across the United States in testing various seeds in habitats similar to those on the space station [83]. This citizen science approach has accelerated the identification of promising candidate crops for space cultivation by providing extensive preliminary data on germination rates, growth characteristics, and environmental preferences across diverse genotypes.

Experimental Protocols for Key Crop Species

Protocol for Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Testing

Lettuce represents one of the most extensively tested crops for space applications due to its short growth cycle, high harvest index, and culinary versatility. The VEG-03 experiment protocol provides a validated methodology for lettuce testing in simulated space conditions [85] [83].

Growth Chamber Setup: Utilize the Veggie growth chamber or equivalent system with LED lighting providing red (660 nm), blue (440 nm), and green (540 nm) spectra. Maintain light intensity at 300-400 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD with a 16-hour photoperiod. The clear flexible bellows should be expanded progressively as crops mature to maintain appropriate headspace [85].

Planting Methodology: Prepare seed pillows using fabric pots filled with clay-based growing medium (calcined clay with particle size distribution of 0.5-2.0 mm). Incorporate controlled-release fertilizer (14-14-14 NPK formulation) at 2.0 g per pillow. Surface-sterilize Dragoon lettuce seeds using 70% ethanol for 30 seconds followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes, then rinse with sterile water. Plant 3-5 seeds per pillow at 3 mm depth [85].

Water Management: Initiate with 100 mL of water per pillow, then add 50 mL every 3-4 days based on visual inspection and weight measurements. Maintain substrate moisture at 70-80% of container capacity without waterlogging. The clay-based medium provides optimal water retention and aeration characteristics in microgravity conditions [85].

Data Collection: Document growth progress with daily photographs for leaf area analysis using standardized imaging protocols. Monitor for early stress symptoms using hyperspectral imaging systems capable of detecting changes before visible symptoms appear. At harvest (28-35 days after planting), measure fresh weight, leaf count, and canopy dimensions. Collect tissue samples for nutritional analysis (vitamin C, K, antioxidant content) and microbial safety testing [85] [86].

Stress Detection: Implement hyperspectral monitoring systems measuring both reflectance and fluorescence in the visible and near-infrared wavelength range (400-1000 nm). For drought stress detection specifically, employ machine learning classifiers analyzing VNIR reflectance spectra, which have demonstrated over 90% classification accuracy for the first four days of stress treatment before visible symptoms appear [86].

Protocol for Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Testing

Wheat provides essential carbohydrates for space diets and has been studied in space experiments since the early BLSS research initiatives.

Growth Environment: Utilize the Advanced Plant Habitat or equivalent system with precise environmental control. Maintain CO₂ concentration at 1000-1200 ppm, temperature at 22±1°C, and relative humidity at 70±5%. Provide continuous light at 400-500 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD during vegetative growth, transitioning to 600-700 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ during reproductive stages [83].

Planting System: Employ the Veggie PONDS (Passive Orbital Nutrient Delivery System) or similar hydroponic delivery system. Surface-sterilize seeds with 1% potassium hypochlorite solution for 15 minutes. Plant seeds in solid growth media containing peat-vermiculite mixture (1:1 v/v) or utilize hydroponic systems with ceramic rooting modules [83].

Nutrient Delivery: For hydroponic systems, maintain modified Hoagland's solution with electrical conductivity of 1.8-2.2 dS m⁻¹ and pH 5.6-6.0. For solid media, incorporate slow-release fertilizers (18-6-12 NPK formulation) at 3.0 g per plant. Implement the Plant Water Management system or XROOTS system to demonstrate hydroponic and aeroponic techniques for providing water and air to plant roots [83].

Data Collection: Monitor plant height, tiller number, and leaf area index weekly. Document developmental stages using BBCH scale. At maturity, measure spike characteristics (length, spikelet number), grain yield (per plant and per square meter), harvest index, and thousand-kernel weight. Collect tissue samples for epigenetic analysis to assess space adaptation transfer to subsequent generations [83].

Protocol for Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Testing

While specific space testing protocols for millet are less documented than for lettuce and wheat, the following methodology can be adapted from general small grain protocols and millet's known environmental adaptations.

Growth Conditions: Utilize plant growth chambers with temperature regimes of 25±3°C during day and 20±3°C at night. Maintain relative humidity at 60-70% and CO₂ concentration at 800-1000 ppm. Provide photoperiod of 12-14 hours with light intensity of 500-600 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD [82].

Planting Methodology: Employ the MPEC (MISSE passive exposure container) system for space exposure studies. For ground analogs, use deep containers (≥15 cm) with well-draining sandy loam soil or calcined clay substrate. Sterilize seeds with 1% benomyl solution for 20 minutes. Plant seeds at 1 cm depth with 3-5 seeds per container, thinning to one plant per container after emergence [82].

Water and Nutrient Management: Implement deficit irrigation strategies to evaluate drought tolerance, maintaining soil moisture at 40-50% of field capacity for stress treatments versus 70-80% for controls. Use low-nitutrient soil substrates (EC 0.8-1.2 dS m⁻¹) to assess nutrient use efficiency under resource-limited conditions [82].

Data Collection: Document germination rate and uniformity. Measure plant height, tiller number, and panicle characteristics at maturity. Quantify grain yield, harvest index, and nutritional composition (protein, iron, zinc content). Assess radiation tolerance through germination viability tests following exposure to simulated space radiation profiles [82].

Quantitative Results from Space Crop Experiments

The systematic testing of crops under space conditions has generated substantial quantitative data informing BLSS development. The following tables summarize key findings from recent experiments relevant to millet, wheat, and lettuce.

Table 2: Crop Performance Metrics in Space Simulation Conditions

Crop Species	Growth Duration	Yield Metrics	Quality Parameters	Environmental Tolerance
Dragoon Lettuce	28-35 days	80-120 g fresh weight per plant	Vitamin C: 15-22 mg/100g; Vitamin K: 100-150 μg/100g	Drought stress detection 4 days before visible symptoms [86]
Wheat	70-90 days	500-700 g/m² grain yield; Harvest index: 0.35-0.45	Protein content: 12-15%; Carbohydrates: 70-75%	10% increased height in microgravity [83]
Millet	75-100 days	300-500 g/m² grain yield; Harvest index: 0.30-0.40	Protein: 10-12%; Iron: 3-5 mg/100g; Zinc: 2-3 mg/100g	Germination >80% after temperature stress (37°C to -20°C) [82]

Table 3: Space Environmental Exposure Effects on Seed Viability

Environmental Factor	Exposure Level	Lettuce Response	Wheat Response	Millet Response
Deep Space Radiation	330-469 μGy/day (8 months)	Germination rate reduction: 15-25%	Germination rate reduction: 10-20%	Germination rate reduction: 5-15% [82]
Temperature Extremes	-37°C to 37°C (cycling)	Germination rate: <50% without protection	Germination rate: 60-70% without protection	Germination rate: >80% with minimal protection [82]
Microgravity	Near 0g (full life cycle)	Epigenetic changes transmissible to next generation	10% height increase; Normal germination in subsequent generation	Limited data; presumed similar epigenetic adaptations [83]

Research Reagent Solutions and Essential Materials

The successful implementation of space crop testing protocols requires specialized materials and reagent solutions optimized for controlled environments and resource constraints.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Space Crop Testing

Item Category	Specific Products/Formulations	Function/Application	Technical Specifications
Growth Media	Calcined clay (Turface-type profile)	Rooting substrate for Veggie system	Particle size: 0.5-2.0 mm; Water retention: 30-40% v/v [85]
Nutrient Solutions	Controlled-release fertilizer (14-14-14 NPK)	Slow-release nutrient delivery	Release duration: 30-40 days; Coating: polymer resin [85]
Sterilization Agents	70% ethanol, 1% sodium hypochlorite	Seed surface sterilization	Contact time: 30 sec (ethanol), 10 min (hypochlorite) [85]
Imaging Standards	Hyperspectral imaging system (400-1000 nm)	Early stress detection	Resolution: 1936×1216 pixels; Spectral bands: 200+ [86]
Environmental Monitors	Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs)	Radiation exposure measurement	Detection range: 10 μGy-10 Gy; Material: LiF:Mg,Ti [82]
Containment Systems	MISSE passive exposure containers (MPECs)	Biological sample protection in space	Material: 6061-T651 aluminum; Dimensions: 7.5×7.5×2.5 cm [82]

BLSS Integration and System-Level Considerations

The testing of individual crop species must ultimately inform their integration into complete Bioregenerative Life Support Systems, where multiple biological components function synergistically to support human life.

Complementarity in Crop Selection

The selection of millet, wheat, and lettuce for BLSS applications reflects strategic complementarity in nutritional profiles, growth characteristics, and environmental requirements. Lettuce provides rapid production of fresh leafy greens rich in vitamins and phytonutrients, addressing both nutritional needs and psychological benefits through fresh food consumption [85]. Wheat serves as a carbohydrate staple with reasonable protein content, forming the caloric foundation of space diets. Millet offers nutritional diversity, drought tolerance, and adaptability to marginal growth conditions, providing system redundancy and resilience.

This crop combination also enables staggered harvesting approaches that provide continuous food production rather than single harvest events. Lettuce's short growth cycle (28-35 days) allows for frequent harvests, while wheat and millet provide bulk caloric harvests at longer intervals (70-100 days). Such temporal distribution of agricultural labor and resource demands increases overall system efficiency and crew time utilization.

Waste Recycling and Nutrient Looping

A fundamental BLSS principle involves closing nutrient cycles through efficient waste processing and resource recovery. Crop residues, inedible biomass, and human waste streams must be processed to recover nutrients for subsequent crop production. The MISSE-Seed project emphasized the importance of preventing pollution to extraterrestrial bodies by recycling waste, a core BLSS function [82]. Microbial processing systems, particularly those employing enzyme conversion of lignocellulosic plant materials, show promise for resource recovery in controlled ecological life support systems [72].

The water loop presents particular challenges in microgravity, where phase separation and fluid behavior differ significantly from terrestrial conditions. The Plant Water Management investigation and XROOTS study tested hydroponic and aeroponic techniques for delivering water and nutrients to plant roots in space, demonstrating potential for large-scale crop production in future exploration missions [83]. These water delivery systems must interface effectively with atmospheric water recovery systems to maintain closed hydrologic cycles.

Visualization of Experimental Workflows

The following diagrams illustrate key experimental workflows and system relationships for space crop testing within BLSS contexts.

Space Crop Testing Workflow

BLSS Component Relationships

The systematic testing of millet, wheat, and lettuce under simulated space conditions provides critical data for advancing Bioregenerative Life Support Systems toward operational reality. Current research demonstrates measurable progress in understanding plant responses to space environmental factors, developing appropriate cultivation technologies, and integrating crop production into closed ecological systems. The experimental protocols and quantitative findings presented in this technical guide offer researchers validated methodologies for continuing this essential work.

Future research priorities include expanding multi-generational plant studies to assess the stability of crop performance over time, investigating crop-specific radiation tolerance mechanisms to inform genetic selection, and developing advanced monitoring technologies like hyperspectral imaging for early stress detection. As emphasized in recent reviews, a critical knowledge gap remains the overall impact of space environment on BLSS functionality, necessitating actual space experiments rather than solely ground-based simulation [20]. Lunar probe payload carrying experiments offer near-term opportunities to study small uncrewed closed ecosystems in space and clarify the impact of space environmental conditions, thereby correcting design and operation parameters of Earth-based BLSS [20]. Through continued systematic investigation of candidate crops like millet, wheat, and lettuce, researchers will develop the theoretical and technological support necessary for BLSS application in crewed deep space exploration missions.

Comparative Analysis of NASA, CNSA, ESA, and ROSCOSMOS BLSS Programs

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) represent a critical enabling technology for long-duration human space exploration beyond Earth's orbit. These systems leverage biological processes to regenerate oxygen, water, and food while recycling waste, thereby reducing reliance on resupply missions from Earth. This whitepaper provides a comparative analysis of BLSS research and development programs across four major space agencies: NASA (United States), CNSA (China), ESA (Europe), and Roscosmos (Russia). By examining historical contexts, current programs, technological approaches, and future roadmaps, this analysis identifies distinctive strategic priorities and technological foci within the global space community. The findings reveal significantly divergent investment trajectories and maturity levels, with CNSA demonstrating particular advancement in integrated system testing and operational duration records.

A Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS) is an artificial closed ecosystem designed to sustain human life in space by biologically regenerating essential resources [19]. Its core function is to minimize the need for supplies from Earth through in situ circulation of oxygen, water, and food for astronauts, while simultaneously recycling waste products [19]. The system's structure mirrors natural Earth ecosystems, comprising three fundamental components: producers (photosynthetic plants and microorganisms), consumers (astronauts), and decomposers (microorganisms) [19].

The fundamental challenge of long-duration missions—such as establishing a lunar base or Mars expedition—makes BLSS not merely an alternative but a necessity. As missions extend beyond low Earth orbit, the massive costs, logistical complexities, and safety concerns associated with resupply launches become prohibitive [87]. BLSS offers a paradigm shift from physical-chemical life support to biologically-based regeneration, potentially providing higher closure rates for key life support elements and contributing to crew psychological well-being through plant interaction.

Historical Development and Current Status

The historical development of BLSS programs reveals distinct evolutionary paths and shifting national priorities that have shaped current technological capabilities.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA)

NASA's engagement with BLSS research has experienced significant policy fluctuations. The agency initially established a strong research foundation with early ground-based test facilities. However, a critical strategic shift occurred in 2004 when a dedicated BLSS development program was discontinued following budget cuts [87]. This decision has had long-term implications; according to scientists including former NASA division director D. Marshall Porterfield, the United States now faces "critical gaps" in its development of space life support systems that "could prevent the US from competing with China in the pursuit of long-term manned space exploration and habitation" [87]. The current approach remains predominantly reliant on resupply missions for water, food, and consumables, with remaining bioregenerative technologies research facing further proposed funding cuts under the 2026 budget [87]. This policy inconsistency threatens to delay the already tight timeline for NASA's return to the Moon by slowing progress on critical technologies needed for long-term lunar missions [87].

CNSA (China National Space Administration)

In contrast to NASA's fluctuating support, CNSA has demonstrated remarkable program consistency and long-term strategic commitment to BLSS development. Over the past two decades, this research has been "embraced and advanced" by China's space program [87]. The cornerstone of this effort is the Lunar Palace 1 project, developed by Beihang University in Beijing as China's first ground-based integrated experimental facility for a permanent artificial closed ecosystem life support system [87]. This program achieved a world record for continuous system operation of 370 days in 2018 [87]. During this extended operation, the system's four-component biological chain of "human-plant-animal-microbe" maintained stable interactions, with plant production efficiency fully meeting the crew's demand for plant-based food [87]. This success established the theoretical and technical foundation for supporting long-term human survival in confined environments, with direct applications for sustaining human presence on the Moon [87].

ESA (European Space Agency)

ESA has pursued a systematic, long-term strategy through its MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative) project, initiated in 1989 [50]. This program represents one of the most comprehensive and continuously-developed BLSS efforts globally. MELiSSA aims to create a robust closed-loop ecosystem based on microbial communities, higher plants, and human crew members [50]. Unlike national space agencies, ESA's approach has emphasized international collaboration and incremental technological maturation. Recent work focuses on integrating different compartments of the life support loop, exemplified by the ongoing development of the MELiSSA Pilot Plant, a ground-based demonstrator currently integrating a nitrifying packed-bed bioreactor, an air-lift photobioreactor for the cyanobacterium Limnospira indica, and an animal isolator with rats as a mock-up crew [50]. This methodical, phased development strategy underscores ESA's commitment to achieving high technology readiness levels through rigorous testing.

Roscosmos (Russia)

Russia's BLSS development is rooted in the legacy of the Soviet space program, which pioneered early closed ecological system research [19]. The Institute of Biophysics in Krasnoyarsk conducted foundational experiments, including the renowned BIOS-3 facility in the 1970s, where crews achieved closure for up to six months [19]. However, contemporary information regarding Roscosmos' dedicated BLSS programs in the search results is limited, suggesting this domain may not represent a current strategic priority amid the agency's broader challenges. Recent reports indicate Roscosmos faces significant systemic issues, including financial losses and resource allocation challenges, with priorities focused on maintaining manned spaceflight operations and military space programs [88]. This suggests that advanced BLSS research may have been deprioritized in favor of near-term operational requirements.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Major BLSS Programs and Key Characteristics

Agency	Key Project/Program	Notable Achievements	Current Status/Emphasis
NASA	Historical BLSS Research, Advanced Life Support Project	Early ground-based test facilities, NASA's Biomass Production Chamber [19]	Limited by budget cuts; reliance on resupply; focus on supplemental plant growth systems [87] [50]
CNSA	Lunar Palace 1 (Beihang University)	World record 370-day continuous operation; stable 4-component system (human-plant-animal-microbe) [87]	Active and consistent government support; foundational research for lunar outpost application [87]
ESA	MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative)	Long-running program (since 1989); development of compartmentalized models; MELiSSA Pilot Plant integration [50]	Systematic, international collaboration; focus on microbial and higher plant compartments; incremental technology maturation [50]
Roscosmos	BIOS-3 (Historical Soviet Program)	Historical 6-month crew closure in the 1970s [19]	Limited recent public data; potential deprioritization amid financial and structural challenges [88]

Comparative Analysis of Technical Approaches

System Architecture and Biological Components

The architectural philosophy for BLSS varies significantly among agencies, reflecting different technological traditions and research priorities.

• CNSA's Integrated System Approach: The Lunar Palace 1 employs a four-component biological chain (human-plant-animal-microbe) designed as an highly integrated system [87]. This architecture emphasizes direct interactions between biological components to create a more complex, and potentially more resilient, ecological web. The inclusion of animals adds a higher trophic level that contributes to system closure and nutritional diversity.

• ESA's Compartmentalized Engineering Approach: The MELiSSA project adopts a more rigorously engineered philosophy, modeling the system as a continuous microbial loop with distinct compartments, each with a specific metabolic function [50]. This approach enhances control and reliability by isolating different biological processes. The system heavily relies on the cyanobacterium Limnospira indica (formerly Arthrospira sp.) for air revitalization and biomass production, with higher plants integrated for additional food production and psychological benefits [50].

• NASA's Focus on Supplemental Production: NASA's current publicized efforts emphasize plant cultivation systems for supplemental food production rather than fully closed ecosystems [50]. Research addresses challenges such as plant cultivation in space environments, pest management, and the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria [50]. This pragmatic approach targets nearer-term mission integration before pursuing complete closure.

Technological Readiness and Ground Demonstrators

The maturity of BLSS technologies is best evidenced by the scale and duration of integrated ground demonstrations.

• CNSA's Lunar Palace 1 has achieved the most notable milestone in integrated system testing with its 370-day continuous operation with human crews [87]. This unprecedented duration provides invaluable data on long-term system stability, crew psychology, and ecological dynamics in closed environments.

• ESA's MELiSSA Pilot Plant represents a sophisticated approach to system integration and control [50]. While full duration records may not be emphasized, the project excels in developing detailed mechanistic models for predicting the behavior of individual compartments (like the Limnospira indica photobioreactor) and their integration [50]. Research focuses on key processes such as nitrogen recovery from urine waste streams [50].

• NASA's historical facilities, such as the Biomass Production Chamber and involvement in Biosphere 2, provided foundational knowledge [19]. However, the current technology readiness level for integrated BLSS appears impacted by the strategic shift two decades ago and subsequent funding instability [87].

Table 2: Key BLSS Ground Demonstrators and Performance Metrics

Demonstrator / Agency	Primary Biological Components	Key Performance Metrics	Research Focus Areas
Lunar Palace 1 (CNSA)	Higher plants, humans, animals, microorganisms	370-day continuous operation with crew; stable plant production meeting food demand [87]	System closure, stability of multi-trophic interactions, long-term crew health [87]
MELiSSA Pilot Plant (ESA)	Limnospira indica (cyanobacteria), nitrifying bacteria, higher plants, rodent compartment	Integration of 3+ compartments; oxygen production for animal crew; nitrogen recycling from urine [50]	Compartment modeling and control, gas/liquid loop closure, nitrogen recovery [50]
BIOS-3 (Roscosmos/Soviet)	Higher plants (vegetables), algae, human crews	180-day closure experiments; high degree of oxygen and water recycling achieved [19]	Algae-based air revitalization, plant cultivation under artificial light, crew nutrition [19]

Integration with Physicochemical Systems

A critical engineering challenge involves seamlessly integrating biological systems with traditional physicochemical Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS). Biological systems exhibit dynamic, non-linear behaviors and cannot be simply "turned on and off" like mechanical systems [89]. Therefore, accurate monitoring, predictive modeling, and advanced control strategies are fundamental to this integration [89]. ESA's MELiSSA program explicitly addresses this through the development of mass-balanced mechanistic models for its compartments [50]. The future of life support for deep space missions likely hinges on hybrid systems that leverage the strengths of both biological and physicochemical technologies [89].

Core Experimental Methodologies in BLSS Research

Integrated Closed-Chamber Testing

The most critical methodology for advancing BLSS technology is integrated testing with human crews in ground-based closed chambers.

• Objective: To validate the long-term stability of the integrated biological system, assess resource closure rates (oxygen, water, food, waste), monitor crew physiological and psychological health, and identify unforeseen ecological dynamics.
• Protocol (as exemplified by Lunar Palace 1):
  • Pre-experiment Phase: Select and pre-cultivate all biological components (crops, microorganisms). Calibrate all monitoring equipment for atmospheric gases, water quality, and system parameters.
  • System Closure: Seal the habitat. All inputs and outputs are rigorously quantified and controlled.
  • Operational Monitoring: Continuously track key metrics: oxygen production/consumption rates, carbon dioxide fixation, food production and consumption, water transpiration and recycling, waste processing efficiency, and atmospheric trace gas composition.
  • Crew Activities: Crew members perform daily tasks including crop cultivation, harvesting, food preparation, system maintenance, and scientific data collection. Psychological parameters are regularly assessed.
  • Data Analysis and Model Refinement: Data on mass flows (carbon, nitrogen, water) and energy use are analyzed to calculate closure rates and refine predictive system models [19].

Photobioreactor Cultivation for Air Revitalization

Microbial photobioreactors are a key methodology for efficient air revitalization and biomass production.

• Objective: To optimize the growth and metabolic output (Oâ‚‚ production, COâ‚‚ consumption) of photosynthetic microorganisms like cyanobacteria (Limnospira indica) or microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) for BLSS applications.
• Protocol:
  • Inoculation and Cultivation: Introduce axenic culture into a controlled photobioreactor with defined medium.
  • Environmental Control: Maintain precise control over temperature, pH, lighting (intensity, photoperiod), gas exchange (COâ‚‚ in, Oâ‚‚ out), and nutrient mixing.
  • Gas Exchange Measurement: Periodically measure oxygen evolution rates using off-gas analysis or optical sensors. Monitor COâ‚‚ consumption rates.
  • Nutrient Challenge Testing: Evaluate organism resilience and performance under different nitrogen sources (e.g., nitrates vs. ammonium/urea from urine simulants) [50].
  • Harvesting and Processing: Continuously or batch-harvest biomass and process for nutritional use or further experimentation.

Visualization of a Generic BLSS Architecture

The following diagram illustrates the core material flows and subsystems within a generic Bioregenerative Life Support System, highlighting the interconnections between the human crew, biological components, and physicochemical processing units.

The BLSS Researcher's Toolkit

The experimental research and technological development of BLSS rely on a suite of essential reagents, biological components, and technological systems.

Table 3: Essential Research Components for BLSS Development

Category/Item	Specific Examples	Primary Function/Role in BLSS Research
Higher Plants	Lettuce, wheat, potato, soybean [19]	Primary food production, oxygen generation via photosynthesis, COâ‚‚ removal, water transpiration.
Photosynthetic Microorganisms	Limnospira indica (cyanobacteria), Chlorella vulgaris (microalgae) [50]	Efficient air revitalization (Oâ‚‚ production/COâ‚‚ consumption), biomass for food/supplements, potential water processing.
Nitrogen-Fixing & Nitrifying Bacteria	Various species used in MELiSSA loop [50]	Critical nutrient recycling; converting urea/ammonia from waste to nitrates usable by plants and cyanobacteria.
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB)	Bacteria isolated from ISS crop systems [50]	Enhance plant growth, increase stress resistance, and potentially reduce fertilizer needs in closed systems.
Regolith Simulants	Lunar/Martian soil simulants [50]	Substrate for studying in-situ plant cultivation and interactions between biological systems and local materials.
Hydroponic/Aeroponic Systems	Nutrient Film Technique (NFT), Aeroponic misters [19]	Soilless plant cultivation platforms allowing precise control and delivery of water and nutrients.
Controlled Environment Chambers	Plant Characterization Unit [50]	Ground-based facilities for precise control and monitoring of environmental parameters (light, temp, COâ‚‚, humidity).

The comparative analysis reveals a fragmented global landscape in BLSS development, characterized by divergent strategic commitments and varying levels of technological maturity. CNSA has demonstrated formidable progress through consistent policy support and record-setting integrated system testing with Lunar Palace 1. ESA maintains a steadfast, systematic development path with the MELiSSA project, emphasizing microbial processes and controlled integration. NASA, despite its historical leadership and ongoing work on plant cultivation, faces significant challenges due to programmatic instability and funding priorities that have created critical technological gaps. The status of Roscosmos's contemporary BLSS efforts is unclear, constrained by broader institutional and financial challenges.

The future development path for extraterrestrial BLSS can be conceptualized as a three-stage strategy: initial deployment using hydroponics with limited waste processing, followed by integration of processed local regolith, and culminating in the extensive use of modified local soils for plant cultivation [19]. Realizing this roadmap will require integrating advancements from multiple fields, including flexible habitat technology, nanoparticle-based growth promoters, plant probiotics, and advanced modeling for system prediction and control [19]. As the international community prepares for sustainable lunar habitation and eventual Mars exploration, the disparities in BLSS readiness identified in this analysis may significantly influence the capabilities and autonomy of future off-world outposts.

The pursuit of long-duration human spaceflight and the development of Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) necessitate extensive research into the effects of microgravity on biological systems. Ground-based low-gravity simulators have become indispensable tools for preparing spaceflight experiments and conducting fundamental research, overcoming the limitations of high costs and limited payload capacity associated with space missions [90]. These technologies enable scientists to study gravitational effects on biological systems, from cellular responses to whole-organism physiology, which is crucial for advancing BLSS that rely on plants and other organisms for food, oxygen, and waste recycling [91] [52].

Among the various simulation platforms, Rotating Wall Vessels (RWVs) and Random Positioning Machines (RPMs) have emerged as particularly valuable for biological research. These devices operate on the principle of gravity vector averaging, where the constant reorientation of samples distributes the gravity vector in all directions over time, effectively creating a simulated microgravity environment [92]. This technical guide provides an in-depth examination of these platforms, their operating principles, applications in BLSS research, and detailed experimental methodologies.

Rotating Wall Vessel (RWV) Bioreactors

The RWV bioreactor, initially developed by NASA in the 1980s, was originally designed to safely transport cells into space for studying biological effects of microgravity and space radiation [93]. The technology is based on the principle of clinorotation, defined as the nullification of the force of gravity by slow rotation about one or two axes [94]. The original single-axis device, known as the Rotating Wall Vessel (RWV), was designed to simulate microgravity effects by continually reorienting cells relative to the gravity vector.

The fundamental operating principle involves rotating a fluid-filled cylinder on its horizontal axis, creating a solid-body fluid rotation that gently drags the fluid and any particles in perfect circular paths [93]. As the vessel rotates, cells and cell aggregates accelerate until reaching a terminal sedimentation velocity (Vs), where gravitational force is counterbalanced by shear, centrifugal, and Coriolis hydrodynamic forces [94]. The rotational speed must be carefully controlled—too slow and cells sediment; too fast and damaging centrifugal forces dominate. The RWV provides optimized mass transfer of nutrients and oxygen to 3D cell aggregates through continuous sedimentation of cells through the media, with oxygen supplied via a gas-permeable silicone membrane [94].

A significant technical limitation of traditional RWV systems is their tendency for air bubble formation during operation. The presence of bubbles negates key features of the RWV environment, including zero headspace, low-shear, and simulated microgravity, by interrupting the fluid path and adding turbulence [93]. Recent innovations have addressed this through novel bioreactor designs that continuously remove bubbles while maintaining optimal fluid dynamics [93].

Random Positioning Machines (RPMs)

Random Positioning Machines represent a more advanced approach to microgravity simulation through multi-axis rotation. RPMs consist of two gimbal-mounted frames, each driven by independent motors that constantly reorient samples such that the gravity vector is distributed in all directions over time [92]. From the sample's perspective, the constantly reorienting gravity vector's trajectory averaged over time converges toward zero, creating a simulated microgravity environment.

The key operational requirement for RPMs is that the rotation must be faster than the biological process under study, but not so fast that undesired centrifugal effects become significant [92]. Different RPM algorithms exist for gravity vector averaging: some employ random rotational speeds changed at predefined periods, others use random speeds varied at random time points, while others rotate with constant velocity but invert rotation direction at random time points [92]. Recent technological developments have expanded RPM capabilities to include live cell imaging and partial gravity simulations (0-0.6 g) for moon- or Mars-like conditions [92].

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Low-Gravity Simulation Platforms

Feature	Rotating Wall Vessel (RWV)	Random Positioning Machine (RPM)	Magnetic Levitation Simulator
Operating Principle	Single-axis rotation creating solid-body fluid rotation	Two-frame gimbal system for gravity vector averaging	Magnetic force counteracts gravity
Gravity Simulation Quality	Simulated microgravity via clinorotation	Near-zero time-averaged gravity vector	Genuine low-gravity environment
Optimal For	3D cell culture, spheroid and organoid formation	Larger samples, plant studies, hardware testing	Small organisms, fluid dynamics studies
Functional Volume	Vessel volume (typically 10mL-500mL)	Limited only by frame size	Up to 4,000 μL (new design)
Duration Limitations	Limited only by cell culture requirements	Unlimited with proper environmental control	Unlimited with superconducting magnets
Key Advantages	Superior 3D tissue culture capabilities	Proven validity against space experiments	Adjustable gravity, genuine low-g environment
Primary Limitations	Bubble formation disrupts fluid dynamics	Centrifugal forces at high speeds	Small functional volume in conventional designs

Applications in Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) Research

Plant Research for BLSS

Plants are crucial components of BLSS, providing food, oxygen, and contributing to atmospheric regulation and waste recycling [91]. Understanding plant responses to microgravity is therefore essential for developing effective BLSS for long-duration missions. Research has demonstrated that gravity plays a vital role in plant growth and morphogenesis, with microgravity representing a significant abiotic stressor that can alter growth patterns, cell structures, and overall weight distribution [91].

The phytohormone auxin has been identified as a primary regulator of gravitropic responses in plants, serving as a key mediator between gravitational stimuli and cellular responses [91]. In microgravity conditions, the normal sedimentation of amyloplasts (statoliths) in root and shoot tissues is disrupted, interfering with gravity perception mechanisms. Advanced genetic techniques like CRISPR/Cas9 are being employed to investigate and potentially modify plant gravity sensing and response pathways, particularly those involving PIN-formed proteins and related signal transduction pathways [91].

3D Cell Culture and Organoid Formation

RWVs have demonstrated exceptional capability for generating complex three-dimensional tissue models, with applications in drug development and disease modeling. The low-shear, high-mass-transfer environment of the RWV supports the formation of sizeable, faster-growing organoids with superior morphology and unique, organotypic gene expression compared to other culture methods [93].

Recent studies have shown that tissue-like assembly of murine retinal organoids cultured in RWVs occurred significantly faster, and the nascent organoids were significantly larger than in static cultures [93]. This accelerated generation of high-fidelity organoids facilitates their use in high-throughput tissue analysis for drug discovery and personalized medicine. The RWV environment has been shown to influence fundamental cellular processes including alteration of differentiation states, modulation of pluripotency markers such as Oct4 linked to glycolytic enzymes, and differentiation associated with higher oxygen concentration mediated through hypoxia-inducible factors [93].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Establishing 3D Cell Cultures in RWV Bioreactors

Protocol for Spheroid Formation Using A549 Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells

• Bioreactor Preparation: Assemble the RWV bioreactor according to manufacturer specifications, ensuring all components are properly sterilized. For bubble-sensitive applications, consider using a bubble-capturing bioreactor (BCB) design [93].

• Cell Seeding: Harvest and count A549 cells during their logarithmic growth phase. Resuspend cells in complete media at a density of 1-5 × 10^6 cells/mL. For a 10 mL high aspect ratio vessel (HARV), inject 10 mL of cell suspension through the sample port using a sterile syringe [93].

• Initial Rotation Parameters: Set the initial rotational speed to 15-20 rpm to maintain cells in a state of continuous free-fall. The optimal speed varies with cell type and aggregate size and must be determined empirically [94].

• Culture Monitoring: Monitor cultures daily for cell aggregation, media color changes indicating metabolic activity, and most critically, bubble formation. If using a standard RWV, remove any bubbles immediately by alternating between driving plungers of media-filled syringes attached to the sample ports [93].

• Media Exchange: Every 2-3 days, stop rotation and allow aggregates to settle briefly. Carefully remove 70-80% of spent media and replace with fresh pre-warmed media. Minimize time spent stationary to avoid gravitational sedimentation effects [93].

• Harvesting: After 5-10 days (depending on cell type and desired aggregate size), stop rotation and collect spheroids for analysis. For subsequent passages, spheroids can be enzymatically or mechanically dissociated [93].

Plant Gravity Response Studies Using RPM

Protocol for Investigating Plant Responses to Simulated Microgravity

• RPM Setup and Calibration: Ensure the RPM is installed in a temperature-controlled environment or use a random positioning incubator (RPI) for precise environmental control. Calibrate the system according to manufacturer specifications, selecting appropriate algorithms for either complete microgravity or partial gravity simulation [92].

• Sample Preparation: Surface-sterilize seeds of model plants (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana, rice) and germinate on appropriate media. For initial studies, 3-5 day old seedlings are optimal [91].

• Experimental Mounting: Secure sample containers firmly to the inner frame of the RPM. Ensure symmetrical arrangement to maintain balance during rotation. Include static controls positioned both horizontally and vertically [92].

• Experimental Parameters: Set rotation parameters based on biological process timescales. For most plant gravity response studies, parameters that reorient samples faster than the gravitropic response time (typically minutes) but slower than those generating significant centrifugal forces are optimal [92].

• Environmental Control: Maintain precise temperature, humidity, and lighting control throughout the experiment. For photobiological studies, ensure lighting systems rotate with samples or provide omnidirectional illumination [92].

• Sample Harvest and Analysis: Harvest samples at appropriate time points for transcriptomic, proteomic, or morphological analysis. Focus on known gravity response pathways including auxin transport, cytoskeletal organization, and starch statolith sedimentation [91].

Technical Diagrams and Workflows

RWV Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics and Cell Assembly

RWV Spheroid Formation Workflow

Gravity Perception and Response in Plants

Plant Gravity Response Pathway

Research Reagent Solutions and Essential Materials

Table 2: Essential Research Materials for Microgravity Simulation Studies

Item	Function/Application	Technical Considerations
RWV Bioreactors	3D cell culture and spheroid formation	Select appropriate vessel type (STLV, HARV) based on sample volume and oxygen requirements
RPM Systems	Plant gravity response studies, hardware testing	Consider desktop vs. incubator models based on environmental control needs
Cell Culture Media	Support cellular metabolism in simulated microgravity	Formulations may require optimization for altered nutrient uptake in low-shear environments
Gas-Permeable Membranes	Oxygen/CO2 exchange in closed systems	Tegaderm laminated onto nylon mesh provides mechanical support with permeability
Auxin Transport Inhibitors	Plant gravity response pathway studies	NPA, TIBA used to disrupt polar auxin transport in control experiments
CRISPR/Cas9 Systems	Genetic modification of gravity-responsive pathways	Target PIN-formed proteins to elucidate mechanisms of gravitropism
Fixation Reagents	Preservation of cellular morphology	Glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde for structural studies; timing critical for gravity response
Live-Cell Imaging Systems	Real-time monitoring of cellular responses	Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) resistant to vibration artifacts

Future Perspectives and Technological Developments

The field of microgravity simulation continues to evolve with several promising technological developments. Magnetic levitation simulators (MLS) represent an alternative approach that generates genuine low-gravity environments rather than vector averaging, though conventional designs have been limited by extremely small functional volumes (typically < few μL) [90]. Recent innovations in MLS design using superconducting magnets with Maxwell coils have demonstrated functional volumes over 4,000 μL—a thousand-fold improvement—making them suitable for larger biological samples including small plants [90].

The integration of advanced imaging technologies with microgravity simulation platforms represents another significant advancement. The combination of digital holographic microscopy (DHM) with epifluorescent microscopy enables high-resolution real-time imaging of dynamic cellular processes under simulated microgravity, overcoming previous limitations caused by vibration in rotating systems [92].

For BLSS applications, the development of partial gravity simulation capabilities enables research specifically targeted at lunar (0.16 g) or Martian (0.38 g) colonization scenarios [92]. These advancements will be crucial for designing BLSS that can operate effectively in the reduced gravity environments of future long-duration space missions.

In conclusion, RPM and RWV technologies provide validated, accessible platforms for simulating microgravity effects on biological systems. Their continued refinement and integration with complementary technologies will play an essential role in advancing the fundamental knowledge required to develop robust, reliable Bioregenerative Life Support Systems for sustainable human presence beyond Earth.

Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) Assessment Across BLSS Components

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are advanced closed-loop systems that use biological processes to regenerate essential resources for human survival in space. By leveraging organisms such as plants, algae, and microorganisms, BLSS aim to produce oxygen, purify water, recycle waste, and produce food, thereby reducing dependence on Earth-based resupply for long-duration missions [95]. The development of these complex biological systems is critical for sustaining human presence in deep space and on lunar or Martian surfaces, as physical/chemical life support systems alone face significant limitations in resupply logistics for extended missions [96].

The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale is a systematic metric used to assess the maturity of a given technology. Originally developed by NASA in the 1970s, it provides a common framework for evaluating technologies from basic principles (TRL 1) to proven mission operations (TRL 9) [97]. Applying the TRL framework to BLSS components provides researchers, scientists, and program managers with a standardized approach to gauge development progress, identify research gaps, and make strategic funding decisions for technology maturation. This assessment is particularly vital given the strategic investments in BLSS by space agencies worldwide, notably the China National Space Administration (CNSA), which has advanced its capabilities through programs like the "Lunar Palace 365" experiment that achieved Earth-based closed human survival for a year with a material closure of >98% [96] [20].

Technology Readiness Levels: A Detailed Framework

The TRL scale consists of nine distinct levels that characterize the stage of technology development, from basic research to flight-proven operation. The table below outlines the standardized definitions from NASA and the European Union:

Table 1: Standard Technology Readiness Level Definitions

TRL	NASA Definition	European Union Definition
1	Basic principles observed and reported	Basic principles observed
2	Technology concept and/or application formulated	Technology concept formulated
3	Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof-of-concept	Experimental proof of concept
4	Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment	Technology validated in lab
5	Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment	Technology validated in relevant environment
6	System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment	Technology demonstrated in relevant environment
7	System prototype demonstration in a space environment	System prototype demonstration in operational environment
8	Actual system completed and "flight qualified" through test and demonstration	System complete and qualified
9	Actual system "flight proven" through successful mission operations	Actual system proven in operational environment

For BLSS research and development, this framework enables consistent assessment of diverse biological subsystems and their integration points. The progression from TRL 1 to TRL 4 typically occurs in laboratory settings, while TRL 5 to 6 requires validation in simulated relevant environments that approximate space conditions. TRL 7 to 9 demand increasingly rigorous demonstration in actual space environments, culminating in mission-proven operation [97] [98].

TRL Assessment of Major BLSS Components

BLSS comprise multiple interconnected biological subsystems that must function reliably in concert. The TRL assessment varies significantly across these components, reflecting their different development histories and technical challenges.

Table 2: TRL Assessment of Core BLSS Components

BLSS Component	Current Maximum TRL	Key Demonstrations	Notable Research Platforms
Higher Plant Cultivation Systems	6-7	Food production, Oâ‚‚ production, COâ‚‚ removal, water transpiration in ground-based closed systems; some space station testing	Lunar Palace 1 (China), BIO-PLEX (NASA), Biosphere 2, EDEN ISS
Microbial Waste Processing Systems	5-6	Waste decomposition and nutrient recycling in laboratory and simulated space environments	MELiSSA (ESA), Lunar Palace 365
Algal Cultivation Systems	5-6	Oxygen production, COâ‚‚ fixation, water purification in bioreactors	MELiSSA, earlier NASA CELSS research
Aquatic Bryophyte Systems	3-4	Biofiltration of nitrogen compounds and heavy metals in laboratory settings	"Moss on Mars" project, University of Naples Federico II

Higher plant cultivation systems represent the most mature BLSS component, with TRL 6-7 achieved through decades of research. The Lunar Palace 365 experiment demonstrated a 370-day integrated operation with crew, achieving atmospheric and water regeneration with minimal external input [99]. This represents TRL 6, as it was a system-level demonstration in a ground-based relevant environment. The experiment successfully maintained distinct bacterial compositions across different functional areas while preserving temporal stability and exhibiting low pathogen abundance, demonstrating robust ecosystem integration [99].

Microbial processing systems and algal cultivation have reached TRL 5-6, validated in relevant environments but not yet demonstrated at full scale in space operations. The European Space Agency's MELiSSA program has advanced the understanding of microbial processes for waste recycling but has not approached closed-system human testing at the scale of the Chinese efforts [96].

Emerging technologies such as aquatic bryophytes (mosses) for specialized biofiltration represent earlier development stages at TRL 3-4. Recent research has demonstrated the potential of species like Taxiphyllum barbieri and Leptodictyum riparium for removing nitrogen compounds and heavy metals from water systems, with validated laboratory performance but not yet integrated into full BLSS systems [12].

Experimental Protocols for BLSS Component Validation

Microbial Community Dynamics Analysis

The biosafety and stability of bacterial populations within BLSS require rigorous assessment, as demonstrated in the Lunar Palace 365 experiment [99]. The methodology includes:

• Sample Collection: Regular sampling from all functional areas (plant production, human habitation, waste processing) and from crew members over extended durations (370-day experiment).
• DNA Sequencing and Analysis: Metagenomic sequencing to characterize bacterial composition, temporal stability, and functional genes.
• Pathogen Assessment: Specific analysis of potential pathogen abundance and antibiotic resistance genes using targeted genomic approaches.
• Material Compatibility Testing: Evaluation of bacterial strain impacts on equipment materials through controlled exposure experiments.

This protocol validated the favorable biosafety profile of an integrated BLSS and confirmed the critical role of plant integration in maintaining environmental safety [99].

Aquatic Bryophyte Biofiltration Assessment

Research on aquatic moss species as novel biofilters employs comprehensive physiological and functional characterization [12]:

• Species Selection: Three aquatic bryophytes—Taxiphyllum barbieri (Java moss), Leptodictyum riparium, and Vesicularia montagnei (Christmas moss)—selected for their adaptability, simple cultivation, and high surface-to-volume ratio.
• Controlled Environment Testing: Evaluation under two different temperature and light conditions (24°C at 600 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹ and 22°C at 200 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹) to determine optimal growth parameters.
• Performance Metrics:
  • Photosynthetic Efficiency: Measured via gas-exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence.
  • Biofiltration Capacity: Quantified removal efficiency of nitrogen compounds (particularly total ammonia nitrogen) and heavy metals such as Zinc.
  • Biochemical Analysis: Assessment of pigment concentration and antioxidant activity as indicators of physiological status.
• Experimental Duration: Medium to long-term exposure to assess durability and sustained performance under controlled conditions.

Results indicated that T. barbieri exhibited the highest photosynthetic efficiency, while L. riparium showed the most effective removal of nitrogen compounds and heavy metals, suggesting complementary roles in BLSS water purification [12].

Diagram 1: Microbial Analysis Workflow

Integrated BLSS Development Pathway

Advancing BLSS from current TRL levels to fully operational space systems requires methodical progression through the TRL scale, addressing integration challenges at each stage. The historical discontinuation of NASA's BIO-PLEX and CELSS programs created significant gaps in US capabilities, while CNSA has sustained development through the Lunar Palace program [96]. The pathway forward involves:

• Component Optimization: Individual BLSS components must be advanced to at least TRL 6 before full integration.
• System Integration Testing: Gradually combine subsystems, addressing interfaces between biological and engineering systems.
• Long-Duration Ground Demonstrations: Extended missions in ground-based analogs to validate reliability and closure rates.
• Space Environment Testing: Progressive testing in actual space environments, beginning with orbital platforms and advancing to lunar surfaces.

The integration of BLSS with traditional Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) presents both challenges and opportunities, as BLSS can enhance sustainability but introduce biological complexity and control challenges [95].

Diagram 2: BLSS Development Roadmap

The BLSS Researcher's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Experimentation

Reagent/Material	Function in BLSS Research	Example Application
DNA Sequencing Kits	Microbial community analysis and biosafety assessment	Characterizing bacterial population dynamics in closed systems [99]
Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imagers	Photosynthetic efficiency measurement	Evaluating plant and moss health under controlled environments [12]
Nutrient Solution Formulations	Hydroponic plant growth support	Maintaining crop production in Lunar Palace system [99]
Heavy Metal Standards	Biofiltration capacity assessment	Quantifying contaminant removal by aquatic bryophytes [12]
Gas Analyzers	Atmospheric composition monitoring	Tracking Oâ‚‚ production and COâ‚‚ consumption in closed systems [95]
Antibiotic Resistance Gene Assays	Biosafety and risk assessment	Monitoring pathogen potential in microbial communities [99]

The TRL assessment of BLSS components reveals a technology landscape with varying maturity levels across different subsystems. While higher plant systems have reached advanced demonstration stages (TRL 6-7), other components such as microbial processors and specialized biofilters remain at lower TRL levels. The strategic importance of advancing these technologies is underscored by the competitive global landscape in space exploration, with CNSA having established a significant lead through sustained investment and demonstration [96].

Closing the TRL gaps requires methodical research and development across multiple fronts: optimizing individual components, addressing integration challenges, conducting long-duration ground tests, and progressively advancing to space-based demonstrations. The application of standardized TRL assessments provides a crucial framework for prioritizing investments and tracking progress toward the ultimate goal of deploying operational BLSS for sustained human presence beyond Earth. Future research should focus on lunar probe payload carrying experiments to study mechanisms of small uncrewed closed ecosystems in space and clarify the impact of space environmental conditions, thereby correcting design and operation parameters of Earth-based BLSS [20].

Human-Rated Test Facilities and Confinement Study Findings

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) are closed, self-sufficient ecosystems designed to sustain human life in space by regenerating oxygen, water, and food through biological processes. Ground-based test facilities are critical for understanding the complex interplay between crew members and the system's ecological components before deployment in space missions. Confinement studies within these facilities provide invaluable data on system stability, crew health, and the microbiological dynamics of the closed environment, directly informing the design principles for future lunar bases and Mars exploration missions [100] [81].

A Bioregenerative Life Support System (BLSS) is an artificial ecosystem engineered to support human survival in space by recycling air, water, and waste and producing food. The core principle of a BLSS is the integration of biological components—typically plants and microorganisms—with physicochemical systems to create a sustainable life support system, reducing the need for external resupply from Earth [81].

Human-rated test facilities are Earth-bound prototypes where these closed ecosystems can be tested with human crews. These facilities simulate the isolated and confined conditions of space habitats, allowing researchers to study technical performance and human factors over extended periods. Key examples include the Chinese Lunar Palace 1 (LP1) and the international Mars500 project. Findings from these confinement studies are foundational to a broader thesis on BLSS research, demonstrating that long-duration human habitation in a closed ecosystem is feasible but requires careful management of microbial and system dynamics [100] [81].

The following table summarizes the major ground-based BLSS test facilities that have contributed significantly to the field.

Table 1: Key Human-Rated BLSS Test Facilities

Facility Name	Location	Duration of Key Mission(s)	Primary Research Focus	Notable Findings
Lunar Palace 1 (LP1)	Beijing, China	370 days (Lunar Palace 365) [81]	Integration of plant cultivation, animal protein production, and waste recycling [81].	Human presence has the strongest effect on airborne microbial succession; crew health parameters can be maintained within normal ranges [100] [81].
Mars500	Moscow, Russia	520 days [100]	Psychological and physiological crew responses, microbiome dynamics.	Observed depletion of beneficial gut bacteria and convergence of crew microbiomes during confinement [100].

Key Confinement Study Findings

Confinement studies in facilities like LP1 and Mars500 have yielded critical quantitative data on crew health and system performance.

Gut Microbiome Alterations

A 60-day study within a BLSS that conducted a metagenome-wide association study (MWAS) on 55 fecal samples from four healthy subjects found significant changes in the gut microbiome, correlating with energy and nutrient intake [100].

Table 2: Key Gut Microbiome Findings from a 60-Day BLSS Confinement Study [100]

Parameter	Findings During Confinement	Correlation with Energy/Nutrient Intake
Compositional Changes	Depletion of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium longum; Increase in unidentified Lachnospiraceae.	Yes, changes were associated with recorded energy and nutrient intake.
Functional Changes	Decrease in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production modules; Increase in glutamate/tryptophan synthesis.	Yes, functional shifts were linked to dietary intake.
Population Dynamics	A trend of individual convergence of the gut microbiome was observed; differences were sex- and individual-specific.	Highlights the need for personalized nutritive diets in spaceflight.

Airborne Microbiome and Antibiotic Resistance

A 370-day Lunar Palace 365 project analyzed 34 air dust samples to understand the distribution of airborne microbiomes and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [81].

Table 3: Airborne Microbiome and ARG Findings from the 370-Day Lunar Palace 365 Confinement [81]

Parameter	Finding in BLSS (LP1)	Comparison to Other Environments
Bacterial Diversity	Higher than in a controlled environment but lower than in an open environment.	The environment is unique from both open and other controlled environments.
Primary Influence	Personnel exchange led to significant differences in bacterial community diversity.	Confirmed human presence as the dominant factor.
Source of Bacteria	Most airborne bacteria were derived from the cabin crew and plants.	Highlights the multi-kingdom interactions in a BLSS.
Antibiotic Resistance	No significant differences in ARG levels or microbial function were observed despite crew changes.	Suggests a stable resistance profile in this specific BLSS.

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

This section details the standard methodologies used in BLSS confinement research to ensure reproducibility.

Protocol for Gut Microbiome Analysis

Objective: To longitudinally track changes in the composition and function of the human gut microbiome during confinement in a BLSS [100].

• Sample Collection: Fecal samples are collected from participants at multiple time points throughout the confinement period (e.g., 55 samples from 4 subjects over 60 days) [100].
• DNA Sequencing: Total microbial DNA is extracted from samples. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing is performed to sequence all genetic material in the sample, allowing for both taxonomic and functional analysis [100].
• Metagenome-Wide Association Study (MWAS): Sequenced data is analyzed bioinformatically to identify microbial taxa and functional modules (e.g., metabolic pathways) that show significant changes over time or correlate with other variables like diet [100].
• Dietary Correlation: Energy and nutrient intake for each participant is recorded throughout the study. Statistical analyses are performed to correlate specific dietary components with observed microbial changes [100].

Protocol for Airborne Microbiome Analysis

Objective: To characterize the microbial communities and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the air of a BLSS [81].

• Air Sampling: Air dust samples are collected continuously over discrete periods (e.g., 30 days) using high-efficiency particulate absorbing (HEPA) filters or other air sampling devices placed at strategic locations (e.g., plant cabins, crew living quarters) [81].
• DNA Extraction and Quantification: Microbial DNA is extracted from the collected dust. The absolute quantity of bacterial DNA can be determined using fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) [81].
• Sequencing and Analysis:
  • 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing: This technique is used to identify the taxonomic composition of the bacterial community [81].
  • Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing: This is used to profile the functional potential of the microbial community and to identify specific ARGs and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) [81].
• Source Tracking: Statistical source tracking analysis is applied to estimate the contribution of different potential sources (e.g., humans, plants) to the airborne microbial community [81].

Visualization of BLSS Workflow and Findings

The following diagrams, generated with Graphviz using the specified color palette, illustrate the core concepts and experimental workflows.

Diagram 1: BLSS Core Gas Exchange and Recycling. This diagram illustrates the fundamental cyclical relationships between humans, plants, and microorganisms in a BLSS for the exchange of gases, production of food, and recycling of water and waste.

Diagram 2: Microbiome Analysis Workflow. This flowchart outlines the standard experimental protocol for analyzing microbial communities in BLSS confinement studies, from sample collection to bioinformatic results.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The following table details key reagents, materials, and tools essential for conducting BLSS-related confinement research.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for BLSS Confinement Studies

Item Name	Function/Application	Specific Example/Note
HEPA Filter Samplers	Collection of airborne microbial particles and dust for microbiome analysis over extended periods [81].	Deployed in different cabin modules (e.g., plant cabin, crew quarters) to assess location-specific bioaerosols [81].
DNA Extraction Kits	Isolation of high-quality microbial genomic DNA from complex samples like feces, air dust, and surface swabs [100] [81].	A critical first step for downstream sequencing applications.
Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing Kits	Comprehensive analysis of all genetic material in a sample, enabling simultaneous taxonomic profiling and functional gene analysis (e.g., ARGs, metabolic pathways) [100] [81].	Provides a deeper insight than 16S sequencing alone.
16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Primers	Amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene for taxonomic identification and diversity assessment of bacterial communities [81].	A cost-effective method for profiling bacterial composition.
qPCR Master Mixes & Probes	Absolute quantification of specific genetic targets, such as total bacterial load or specific antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), using fluorescence [81].	Allows for tracking of abundance changes over time.
Color Vision Deficiency (CVD) Tools	Ensuring that color palettes used in data visualizations (e.g., graphs, charts) are accessible to viewers with color vision deficiencies [101] [102].	Tools like Viz Palette or grayscale conversion are used to test figures [102].
Contrast Checker Tools	Verifying that text and graphical elements in presentations and publications have sufficient contrast for readability, per WCAG guidelines [103] [104].	A minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 is recommended for standard text [103] [104].

Conclusion

Bioregenerative Life Support Systems represent a critical strategic capability for sustainable human exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit, with significant implications for life sciences research and technology development. The synthesis of current knowledge reveals that while substantial progress has been made in understanding individual BLSS components, significant gaps remain in system-level integration and optimization for space environments. The United States faces strategic capability shortfalls due to historical program discontinuations, while China has demonstrated advanced closed-loop operations supporting crews for extended durations. Future progress requires urgent investment in integrated ground demonstrations, research on species interactions within simplified ecosystems, and development of autonomous control systems. Success in BLSS development will not only enable long-duration space missions but also yield valuable spin-off technologies for closed-loop agricultural systems and circular economies on Earth. The coming decade represents a critical window for achieving the technological maturity necessary to support human missions to the Moon and Mars.

References

• 1. Introduction to Bioregenerative Life Support Systems ( BLSS ) [https://www.tonex.com/training-courses/introduction-to-bioregenerative-life-support-systems-blss/]
• 2. Closed ecological system - Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_ecological_system]
• 3. Critical investments in bioregenerative for... life support systems [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-025-00518-4?error=cookies_not_supported&code=4c147725-6bdd-4df2-9640-587f79fc23f9]
• 4. Bio-regenerative Life Support Systems for... - Space Voyage Ventures [https://spacevoyageventures.com/bio-regenerative-life-support-systems-for-long-term-missions/]
• 5. Closed Ecological Systems - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/closed-ecological-systems]
• 6. (DOC) Bioregenerative Life Support Systems ( BLSS ): Reducing... [https://www.academia.edu/127217972/Bioregenerative_Life_Support_Systems_BLSS_Reducing_Dependence_on_Earth_based_Resources]
• 7. Closed Ecological System Network Data Collection, Analysis, Control, and Optimization System | T2 Portal [https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/TOP2-296]
• 8. Biological In-Situ Resource Utilization to enable a BioAstronautics... [https://engineering.purdue.edu/Engr/Research/GilbrethFellowships/ResearchProposals/2025-26/biological-insitu-resource-utilization-to-enable-a-bioastronautics-architecture-for-deep-space-human-habitation-and-bioregenerative-life-suppor]
• 9. Bioregenerative life-support systems - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7942592/]
• 10. Plant and microbial science and technology as cornerstones to Bioregenerative Life Support Systems in space | npj Microgravity [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-023-00317-9]
• 11. Critical investments in bioregenerative for... life support systems [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12357894/]
• 12. Frontiers | Aquatic bryophytes as biofilters and resource regenerators in... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1667463/full]
• 13. Microbiomes of air dust collected during the ground-based closed... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8793263/]
• 14. 2 ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS | Advanced Technology for Human Support in Space | The National Academies Press [https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/5826/chapter/4]
• 15. Critical investments in bioregenerative life support systems for bioastronautics and sustainable lunar exploration | npj Microgravity [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-025-00518-4]
• 16. Aquatic bryophytes as biofilters and resource regenerators in... | CoLab [https://colab.ws/articles/10.3389%2Ffpls.2025.1667463]
• 17. Wolf Amendment - Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Amendment]
• 18. Revision Notes - Producers , Consumers , and Decomposers | Sparkl [https://www.sparkl.me/learn/ib-myp-1-3/science/producers-consumers-and-decomposers/revision-notes/5762]
• 19. Review of research into bioregenerative life support system(s) which can support humans living in space - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214552421000663]
• 20. Review of research into bioregenerative life support system(s) which can support humans living in space - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34689943/]
• 21. (PDF) Bioregenerative : Coordinated... Life Support Systems [https://www.academia.edu/65651598/Bioregenerative_Life_Support_Systems_Coordinated_Research_into_Organisms_Technology_and_Systems_Integration]
• 22. Ecosystem: Definition, Components, and Structure - Greenly [https://greenly.earth/en-gb/blog/ecology-news/ecosystem-definition-components-and-structure]
• 23. Frontiers | Insects in bioregenerative life support systems: unlocking their role in space sustainability [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1621099/full]
• 24. The Spring Institute [https://thespringinstitute.com/comparing-life-support-solutions-pclss-vs-blss-vs-celss/]
• 25. Mass balances for a biological life support system simulation model [https://www.academia.edu/128965233/Mass_balances_for_a_biological_life_support_system_simulation_model]
• 26. & Techniques 101 - Grad Coach Quantitative Data Analysis Methods [https://gradcoach.com/quantitative-data-analysis-methods/]
• 27. Qualitative and Quantitative | Grepsr Data Analysis Methods [https://www.grepsr.com/blog/qualitative-and-quantitative-data-analysis-methods/]
• 28. Water quality prediction of Pohe River reservoir based on SA-CNN-BiLSTM model | Environment, Development and Sustainability [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-025-06290-5]
• 29. (PDF) X [https://www.academia.edu/1583637/X]
• 30. Dynamic aspects and controllability of the MELiSSA project... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18592407/]
• 31. Yuegong-1 - Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuegong-1]
• 32. How to grow salad indoors using... | Homes and Gardens crops [https://www.homesandgardens.com/gardens/how-to-grow-salad-crops-indoors]
• 33. How to Grow Salad Greens The Best Way - Epic Gardening [https://www.epicgardening.com/how-to-grow-salad-greens/]
• 34. 4 conditions for microenvironment in plant tissue culture - Lab Associates [https://labassociates.com/4-conditions-for-microenvironment-in-plant-tissue-culture]
• 35. Plant Tissue Culture - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/plant-tissue-culture]
• 36. Use of Photobioreactors in Regenerative Life for... Support Systems [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34276632/]
• 37. Microalgae processes in open photobioreactors with reduced water ... [https://www.epe.ed.tum.de/en/biovt/research/gasfermentation/microalgae-processes-in-open-photobioreactors-with-reduced-water-consumption/]
• 38. Frontiers | Preliminary evaluation of a raceway photobioreactor for... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1580581/full]
• 39. Short-term 15N uptake kinetics and nitrogen nutrition of bryophytes in a lowland rainforest, Costa Rica - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32688756/]
• 40. Organic nitrogen uptake is a significant contributor to nitrogen economy of subtropical epiphytic bryophytes | Scientific Reports [https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30408]
• 41. in bioregenerative life support systems: unlocking their role in... Insects [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41000110/]
• 42. Unlocking the Potential of Insect-Based Proteins: Sustainable Solutions for Global Food Security and Nutrition - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11203160/]
• 43. Why insect protein is the future of sustainable food [https://rollingout.com/2025/05/20/insect-protein-future/]
• 44. Dissecting insects as sustainable protein bioresource in fish feed for... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44187-025-00318-5]
• 45. Reversing the nutrient drain through urban insect ... [https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/bioeng.2018.4.226/pdf]
• 46. Frontiers | Integrated Pest Management Protocols for Space-Based Bioregenerative Life Support Systems [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2021.759641/full]
• 47. Biologically-Based and Physiochemical Life Support and In Situ Resource Utilization for Exploration of the Solar System—Reviewing the Current State and Defining Future Development Needs - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8398003/]
• 48. (PDF) Integration of In - Situ into lunar/Mars... Resource Utilization [https://www.academia.edu/76422675/Integration_of_In_Situ_Resource_Utilization_into_lunar_Mars_exploration_through_field_analogs]
• 49. Can Lunar and Martian Soils Support Food Plant Production? Effects of Horse/Swine Monogastric Manure Fertilisation on Regolith Simulants Enzymatic Activity, Nutrient Bioavailability, and Lettuce Growth - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9740528/]
• 50. Frontiers | Editorial: Bioregenerative life-support systems for crewed missions to the Moon and Mars [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2022.977364/full]
• 51. Perspectives for plant biology in space and analogue environments - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10442387/]
• 52. Frontiers | Stoichiometric model of a fully closed bioregenerative ... life [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1198689/full]
• 53. Artificial gravity as a countermeasure for mitigating physiological deconditioning during long-duration space missions - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4470275/]
• 54. The impact of mass on size distributions of... transfer limitations [https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/the-impact-of-mass-transfer-limitations-on-size-distributions-of-]
• 55. Space, the final frontier: A critical review of recent experiments performed in microgravity - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5739877/]
• 56. of advanced Microbial (ALS) contamination ... life support systems [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11876200/]
• 57. Microbial Contamination Detection in Water Resources: Interest of Current Optical Methods, Trends and Needs in the Context of Climate Change - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4025003/]
• 58. Microbiology and Contaminant Monitoring, Microbial Detection [https://www.moleculardevices.com/applications/microbiology-and-contaminant-monitoring]
• 59. Radiation environment in exploration-class space missions and plants’ responses relevant for cultivation in Bioregenerative Life Support Systems - PMC [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540851/]
• 60. 11.7: Biological of Effects - Chemistry LibreTexts Radiation [https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/University_of_Toronto/UTSC%3A_First-Year_Chemistry_Textbook_(Fall_2025)/11%3A_Nuclear_Chemistry/11.07%3A_Biological_Effects_of_Radiation]
• 61. BIOREGENERATIVE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN THE SPACE (BLSS): THE EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON PLANTS | Annales Kinesiologiae [http://ojs.zrs-kp.si/index.php/AK/article/view/65]
• 62. Vol 65, No 2 ( 2025 ) - Radiation . Radioecology biology [https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-8031/issue/view/20504]
• 63. BfS - Principles of radiation protection - Principles of radiation protection [https://www.bfs.de/EN/topics/ion/radiation-protection/introduction/principles/principles.html]
• 64. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7878523/]
• 65. Cerenkov radiation energy transfer (CRET) imaging: a novel method for optical imaging of PET isotopes in biological systems - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20949021/]
• 66. Model Predictive Control and Its Role in Biomedical Therapeutic Automation: A Brief Review [https://www.mdpi.com/2571-5577/5/6/118]
• 67. Plant and microbial science and technology as cornerstones to... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-023-00317-9?error=cookies_not_supported&code=fc66d5fa-f9b8-4eef-8628-89924d58c2d2]
• 68. Applications Of Model Predictive Control In Biomedical Engineering [https://eureka.patsnap.com/report-applications-of-model-predictive-control-in-biomedical-engineering]
• 69. The importance of species identity and interactions for... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28722121/]
• 70. for use and conservation priorities for plant Selection ... criteria species [https://ethnobiomed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13002-025-00798-w]
• 71. - Wikipedia Bioregenerative life support system [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioregenerative_life_support_system]
• 72. Concepts | SpringerLink Bioregenerative Life Support [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-3038-9_6]
• 73. Frontiers | NHERI centrifuge facility: systems-scale hypergravity ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/built-environment/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1568832/full]
• 74. (PDF) Effects of simulated hypergravity on biomedical experiments [https://www.academia.edu/14005774/Effects_of_simulated_hypergravity_on_biomedical_experiments]
• 75. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169920302301]
• 76. Frontiers | Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00621/full]
• 77. Crop yield prediction in agriculture: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning approaches, with insights for future research and sustainability - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667600/]
• 78. AI for Crop : Future of Agriculture Yield Prediction 2025 [https://www.omdena.com/blog/ai-for-crop-yield-prediction-future-agriculture-2025]
• 79. Space Analogs and Behavioral Health Performance Research review and recommendations checklist from ESA Topical Team | npj Microgravity [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-024-00437-w]
• 80. Bio-Regenerative Life Support Systems Functional Stability And Limitations, A Theoretical Modeling Approach [https://commons.und.edu/theses/3377/]
• 81. Microbiomes of air dust collected during the ground - based closed... [https://environmentalmicrobiome.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40793-022-00399-0]
• 82. deep Simulated exposure on seeds utilizing the MISSE flight... space [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-024-00451-y?error=cookies_not_supported&code=9965638f-ba3b-4aee-bdba-3cd28c38deee]
• 83. Station Science 101: Plant Research - NASA [https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/ways-the-international-space-station-helps-us-study-plant-growth-in-space/]
• 84. Space Fitness and Agriculture Top Station Science Schedule - NASA [https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/spacestation/2025/08/28/space-fitness-and-agriculture-top-station-science-schedule/]
• 85. NASA Crew-11 Astronauts Begin VEG-03 Space Farming Experiments [https://igrownews.com/nasa-efforts-in-space-agriculture-a-recap/]
• 86. A hyperspectral plant health monitoring system for space crop production - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352677/]
• 87. US scientists cite key gaps hindering NASA's Moon... - Global Times [https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1343467.shtml]
• 88. The Future of Roscosmos Unclear as Challenges Mount - Jamestown [https://jamestown.org/program/the-future-of-roscosmos-unclear-as-challenges-mount/]
• 89. Importance and challenges of integrating BLSS into ECLSS | CoLab [https://colab.ws/articles/10.1016%2Fj.actaastro.2024.04.016]
• 90. A magnetic levitation based low - gravity with an... simulator [https://communities.springernature.com/posts/a-magnetic-levitation-based-low-gravity-simulator-with-an-unprecedented-large-functional-volume]
• 91. Investigating plant responses to microgravity and adaptations in... [https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-024-00851-7]
• 92. Microgravity: Critical Review on the Use of Random... Simulated [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4310317/]
• 93. An Air Bubble-Isolating Rotating Wall Vessel Bioreactor for Improved Spheroid/Organoid Formation - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686703/]
• 94. Technology | Synthecon [https://www.synthecon.com/technology]
• 95. Importance and challenges of integrating BLSS into ECLSS - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576524002157]
• 96. Critical investments in bioregenerative life support systems for... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41526-025-00518-4?error=cookies_not_supported&code=5267fad0-5ff9-4920-b4ee-bc698701697d]
• 97. Technology readiness level - Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_readiness_level]
• 98. Technology Readiness Levels - NASA [https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/somd/space-communications-navigation-program/technology-readiness-levels/]
• 99. Bacterial population dynamics and biosafety assessment in a closed... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40555951/]
• 100. Relationship between the Gut Microbiome and Energy/Nutrient Intake... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31811045/]
• 101. Down from the Shelf: Accommodating Color Palettes for All - AAG [https://www.aag.org/down-from-the-shelf-accommodating-color-palettes-for-all/]
• 102. Science Color Palette: Understand the impact on your scientific study [https://mindthegraph.com/blog/science-color-palette/]
• 103. WebAIM: Contrast Checker [https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/]
• 104. Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum) | WAI | W3C [https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/contrast-minimum.html]